​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

​

Primis Financial Corp.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

​

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

​

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

THE HOLDING COMPANY FOR

​

6830 Old Dominion Drive

McLean, Virginia 22101

NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2023

Stockholders of Primis Financial Corp.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) will be held at Primis Financial Corp., 1676 International Drive, McLean, VA 22102, on Thursday, May 25, 2023 beginning at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement, which is attached hereto and made a part thereof.

​

​

The close of business on March 31, 2023 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection by any stockholder at the Company’s office at 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 during usual business hours for a period of at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

Your Vote is Important.

You are cordially invited and urged to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you are urged to submit your proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. You may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card. The proxy is revocable in the manner described in the Proxy Statement at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously returned your proxy card.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please note that we may ask to see valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license, to identify you as a stockholder. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (“street name” holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date.

Cameras (including cellular phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other similar electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting. Please silence your cell phones during the Annual Meeting as a courtesy to others.

​

April 13, 2023
McLean, Virginia

​

​

​

​

​

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2023

​

General Information

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for use at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at Primis Financial Corp., 1676 International Drive, McLean, VA 22102, on Thursday, May 25, 2023, beginning at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time), and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”) for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Meeting and the enclosed proxy card is first being sent to stockholders on or about April 13, 2023. For information on how to vote your shares, see the instructions included on the enclosed proxy card and under “Information About Voting” below.

Important Notice regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on Thursday, May 25, 2023.

The Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 are available at www.envisionreports.com/FRST.

We have mailed to certain stockholders a notice of internet availability of proxy materials on or about April 13, 2023. This notice contains instructions on how to access and review the Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K on the internet. The notice also contains information on how to submit your proxy on the internet or by phone or, if you prefer, to obtain a paper or email copy of the materials.

​

​

​

​

​

Information About Voting

You are entitled to vote at the meeting if you were a holder of record of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value (“Common Stock”), at the close of business on March 31, 2023.

Stockholders can vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. You can vote by proxy by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card or you may vote online at www.envisionreports.com/FRST or by phone at 1-800-652-VOTE (8683).

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from the holder of record, which you should follow in order to vote your shares. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote.

If you vote by proxy, the individuals named on the proxy card (your “proxies”) will vote your shares in the manner you indicate. You may specify whether your shares should be voted for or against each of the proposals. If you sign and return the card without indicating your instructions, your shares will be voted as follows:

You may revoke or change your proxy at any time before it is exercised by (1) delivering to us a signed proxy card with a date later than your previously delivered proxy, (2) voting  in person at the Annual Meeting, or (3) sending a written revocation to the Company’s Secretary, Cheryl Wood, prior to the Annual Meeting. Your most current proxy card will be the one that is counted. All written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to revocation or proxies should be sent to: Primis Financial Corp., 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060, (804) 528-4754, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Any stockholder who holds shares in street name with a bank or broker must contact that bank or broker if he or she wishes to revoke his or her proxy.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by an executed and unrevoked proxy will be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated in the proxy. The proxy also confers on the proxies the discretionary authority to vote with respect to any matter presented at the Annual Meeting for which advance notice was not timely received by the Company in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy solicitation is made by the Board of Directors of the Company and the cost of this solicitation is being borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited through the mail and, if deemed advisable, directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or other means of communication, without being paid additional compensation for such services. The Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding the proxy materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock.

2

​

Annual Report

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including consolidated financial statements and related notes, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC, accompanies but does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.

​

3

​

VOTING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS

Only holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on March 31, 2023 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. On that date there were 24,685,244 shares of Common Stock outstanding, which is the only outstanding class of voting securities of the Company. The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, in order to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions and shares held of record by a broker or nominee that are voted on any matter will be included in determining whether a quorum exists. Each holder of Common Stock shall have one vote for each share of Common Stock registered, on the Record Date, in such holder’s name on the books of the Company.

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers, as holders of record, are permitted to vote on certain routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. The ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is the only matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting that is considered routine under applicable rules. The election of the directors, the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation are not deemed to be routine matters, so a broker is not permitted to vote on these matters without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. If a stockholder holds shares in street name and does not provide voting instructions to its broker, those shares will be counted as broker non-votes in the election of the directors, the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Director nominees are elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular board seat is elected for that seat regardless of whether or not such nominee receives a majority of the votes cast. There will be no cumulative voting in the election of the directors. A broker non-vote or a withholding of authority to vote with respect to the director nominees will not have the effect of a vote against such nominee because it is not a vote cast in favor of or against the proposal.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm. Since the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter under applicable rules and a broker or other nominee may generally vote on routine matters, no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the advisory (non-binding) proposal to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Broker non-votes will be deemed shares not entitled to vote on such matter and will not have any effect on the outcome of such matter. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the advisory (non-binding) proposal to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of holding future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Broker non-votes will be deemed shares not entitled to vote on such matter and will not have any effect on the outcome of such matter. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of holding future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

​

4

​

Proposal 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Election Procedures; Term of Office; Director Retirements

The Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors. Following the date of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors will consist of ten directors in the event that each of the nominees is elected. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, members of the Board of Directors are divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III. The members of each class are elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders following their election.

The Board of Directors has approved the nomination of W. Rand Cook, Eric A. Johnson and Dennis J. Zember, Jr. to serve as Class II directors. The terms of the Class II directors expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2026 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal. The nominees receiving a plurality of the votes of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors will be elected. Unless the authority to vote for the election of directors is withheld, all shares of Common Stock represented by proxy will be voted FOR the election of the nominees.

If the nominees become unavailable to serve as a director for any reason before the election, the shares represented by proxy will be voted for such other person, if any, as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that the nominees will be unavailable to serve as a director. Mr. W. Rand Cook, Mr. Eric A. Johnson and Mr. Dennis J. Zember, Jr. have consented to being named herein and to serve if elected.

Any director vacancy occurring after the election may be filled only by a majority vote of the remaining directors, even if there is less than a quorum of the Board of Directors.

The biographies of the nominees and continuing directors and executive officers below contains information regarding the person’s service as a director and/or executive officer, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that the person should serve as a director and/or executive officer.

Nominee for Election

The following table sets forth the name, age and position with the Company and Primis Bank (the “Bank”) for the nominees for election as directors of the Company:

​

W. Rand Cook has been serving as Chairman of the Board of each the Company and the Bank since 2020. Mr. Cook has also served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. Mr. Cook served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of EVBS and served as a director of EVB and a predecessor of EVB from 2000 until June 2017. Mr. Cook is a Partner in the law firm of McCaul, Martin, Evans and Cook, P.C., where he has been practicing law since 1985, and is the Commissioner of Accounts for Hanover County Circuit Court. Mr. Cook holds both MBA and JD degrees, and maintains an active law practice that focuses on corporate law and debtor and creditor rights. Mr. Cook brings experience in corporate governance, strategic planning and financial planning to the Board of Directors, and his legal background gives Mr. Cook valuable insight into various legal risks that the

5

​

Company may encounter. Previously, Mr. Cook worked with the Virginia General Assembly, which provides Mr. Cook with a unique perspective on state legislative and regulatory environments.

Eric A. Johnson has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. For over 45 years, Mr. Johnson has been in the real estate business. Mr. Johnson has served as a real estate broker with Mason Realty in Middlesex, Virginia since 1976 and served as a director of EVB and a predecessor of EVB from 1988 until June 2017. In addition, Mr. Johnson previously owned Urbanna Market and Urbanna Builders Supply, both of which generated multi-million dollar annual sales. Mr. Johnson brings experience in local real estate markets to the Board of Directors, as well as entrepreneurial spirit, business judgment and knowledge of local business markets that he has developed through his business ventures.

Dennis J. Zember, Jr. has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since February 2020. Mr. Zember was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and the Bank on February 19, 2020. Mr. Zember was previously Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Ameris Bancorp from June 2016 through June 2018 and Chief Financial Officer of Ameris Bancorp from February 2005 through December 2017. The Company believes Mr. Zember’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his extensive banking experience from years spent as an executive in the industry.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

​

6

​

CONTINUING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Members of the Company’s and the Bank’s Board of Directors are expected to have the appropriate skills and characteristics necessary to function in the Company and Bank’s current operating environment and contribute to its future direction and strategies. These include legal, financial, management and other relevant skills. In addition, the Company looks to achieve a diversified Board, including members with varying experience, age, perspective, residence, background, race, gender, and other demographic characteristics.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s Class I and Class III directors whose terms of office do not expire at the Annual Meeting, and the executive officers of the Company and the Bank who are not also directors:

​

John F. Biagas has been a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (“EVBS”) in June 2017. Mr. Biagas served as a director of EVBS and Eastern Virginia Bank (“EVB”) from 2014 until 2017, and has been the owner, President and CEO of Bay Electric Co., Inc., an electrical and general contractor located in Newport News, Virginia since 1997. Mr. Biagas is a Master Electrician licensed in four states and the District of Columbia. Bay Electric serves a very diverse client base and specializes in general contracting as well as in design/build general and electrical construction, security/technology solutions and services, and solar photovoltaic. Under Mr. Biagas’ direction, Bay Electric has become one of the fastest growing minority-owned electrical and general construction contractors in the Mid-Atlantic region with annual revenues in excess of $70 million. Mr. Biagas is also the Vice Rector for the Old Dominion University Board of Visitors and serves as vice chair of the Student Advancement Committee and as a member of the Administration and Finance Committee. Mr. Biagas provides the Board of Directors essential guidance related to his business development expertise and general business experience through owning and operating a fast-paced contracting company and working on multi-million dollar projects. Mr. Biagas brings

7

​

to the Board of Directors extensive experience in identifying potential risks and rewards in real estate development and construction. Mr. Biagas also brings to the Board of Directors leadership skills and oversight experience through his service on numerous local, statewide and national boards, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, a founding and current member of the Virginia Chapter of the Young Presidents Organization and as a founding member and director of Virginia Company Bank from its inception in 2005 until its acquisition by EVBS in 2014.

John M. Eggemeyer has been a director of the Company and the Bank since June 15, 2021. Mr. Eggemeyer is a Founder and Managing Principal of Castle Creek Capital LLC which has been an investor in the banking industry since 1990. Mr. Eggemeyer has over 40 years of experience in the banking industry and has been involved in more than 75 bank acquisitions. In 2006, the American Banker honored Mr. Eggemeyer as “Community Banker of the Year” for his success as a builder of community banking companies. Prior to founding Castle Creek, Mr. Eggemeyer spent nearly 20 years as a senior executive with some of the largest banking organizations in the U.S. with responsibilities across a broad spectrum of banking activities. Mr. Eggemeyer has served as the Chairman of PacWest Bancorp since its formation in 2000, is a Board member of The Bancorp, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. and was a founder and Director of Guaranty Bancorp. Previously, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of White River Capital and a Board member of TCF Financial Corporation, Western Bancorp and American Financial Realty. Mr. Eggemeyer’s civic and philanthropic efforts have been focused in the areas of improving the quality of instruction in education and expanding educational opportunities for lower income students. He was a founder and past President of the Rancho Santa Fe Community School Endowment and was a member of the Rancho Santa Fe School Site Selection Committee. He also helped establish the Minnesota Charter of A Better Chance, a national organization committed to creating improved educational opportunities for minority high school students. Mr. Eggemeyer is a Life Trustee of Northwestern University where he serves on the Finance and Investment Committees and is a past Trustee of the Bishop’s School of La Jolla, California and the Parent Advisory Board at Stanford University. Mr. Eggemeyer holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Northwestern University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Mr. Eggemeyer brings to the Board of Directors extensive experience in identifying potential risks and rewards in the banking industry. The Company benefits from his experience and counsel as member of our board.

F.L. Garrett, III has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. Mr. Garrett served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of EVBS and previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of a predecessor of EVB. Mr. Garrett served as a director of the Bank and a predecessor of the Bank from 1982 until June 2017. Mr. Garrett has owned Harborside Storage since 1994, a boat storage company and has been an active realtor with Long & Foster Real Estate in Essex County, Virginia and neighboring areas since 1989. As a local business owner and a successful realtor, Mr. Garrett contributes to the Board of Directors a strong sense of changing economic and market conditions in the Company’s market areas. Mr. Garrett has also developed extensive knowledge of our business during his extended service to the Company, the Bank and one of the Bank’s predecessors.

Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr. has been a director of the Company and the Bank since June 15, 2021. Dr. Jones is a licensed physical therapist in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Dr. Jones is the owner and CEO of Dominion Physical Therapy, a practice he founded in 1990 and has since expanded to six locations in the Hampton Roads region. Virginia has been Dr. Jones’ home since 1987, the year he completed his degree in physical therapy from the University of Connecticut. Dedicated to continuing education, he earned a Doctor of Physical Therapy degree from Rocky Mountain University School of Health Professions in Provo, Utah, in 2014 and also holds a postgraduate certification in Clinical Management of Head, Facial and Neck Pain and TMJ Disorders. He has been a member of the American Physical Therapy Association since 1988. Dr. Jones’ passion for high-quality care has led to numerous awards for his practice, as well as statewide leadership positions. In 2014, Gov. Terry McAuliffe appointed him to the Virginia State Board of Physical Therapy. Dr. Jones was reelected as Chairman of the Board of Physical Therapy for the state of Virginia on August 11, 2020, where he previously served as Chairman in 2017 and 2018. Dr. Jones served as Chairman for two consecutive years (2019-2021) for the Board of Health Professions. For three decades, Dr. Jones has worked hard to foster a spirit of community involvement and service through his practice. In 2014, Dr. Jones provided financial and staffing support for a collaborative trip with Old Dominion specialists to the Dominican Republic to educate clinical staff there on the treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Dr. Jones serves as a board member of Norfolk State University Foundation and Old Dominion University School of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training. Dr. Allen contributes to the Board of Directors with strong

8

​

ties to its surrounding communities in the Company’s market areas. Dr. Allen has also developed extensive knowledge of our business as he served as our Hampton Advisory Board Chairman since 2018.

Robert Y. Clagett has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since August 2014. Mr. Clagett has practiced law in the State of Maryland since 1967, with a primary focus in real estate law. He previously served as a director of Prince George’s Federal Savings Bank commencing in 1967 and was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in 1968. Mr. Clagett served as President of Prince George’s Federal Savings Bank from 1968 to 2005, and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1968 to 2014. The Company believes Mr. Clagett’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his extensive banking experience and legal expertise.

Deborah B. Diaz has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since October 2020. Ms. Diaz is CEO of Catalyst ADV, a technology and strategic growth advisory firm, and venture capital advisor developing new business markets and industry partnership opportunities since 2016. Catalyst ADV currently provides advisory services to high tech, transportation and aerospace clients such as Google, Boeing, Dell Technologies, Leidos, Equinix, PTC and many other notable public companies. Previously, Ms. Diaz served as Chief Technology Officer and Deputy Chief Information Officer at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration responsible for global system infrastructure, investment oversight, risk management, data management, innovation and technology infusion from 2009 to 2016. As Chief Information Officer for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, she was responsible for all global defense and research system infrastructure and manufacturer delivery to support a $1 billion portfolio from 2002 to 2007. She has also served as a senior government executive and international consultant in the areas of intellectual property, patents, digital transformation, data forensics, and foreign joint ventures. Ms. Diaz serves on the advisory boards of Dell Technologies; Intel Corporation; Equinix, Inc.; Raytheon Forcepoint and on the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Capital Area Chapter Board. Ms. Diaz has also previously served on multiple private company and non-profit boards. Ms. Diaz was NACD Directorship Certified in 2019. The Company believes Ms. Diaz qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include her extensive operational experience as a technology executive and strategic cybersecurity expert focused on digital transformation and risk management.

Charles A. Kabbash has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since April 2005. Mr. Kabbash is the owner of 414 Associates, a real estate investment and holding company, operating primarily in the Charlottesville, Virginia area since 1984. Mr. Kabbash has also served a partner in Kabbash, Fox & Gentry Commercial Real Estate since 2009 and is the owner of Kabbash Business Brokerage, which negotiates the purchase or sale of businesses. Both of these firms also operate primarily in the Charlottesville area. In addition, Mr. Kabbash is the co-owner, along with his wife, Rebecca Gentry, of CandR LLC, a company investing in emerging businesses. Mr. Kabbash was a realtor at Summit Realty from 2002 to 2009. Mr. Kabbash is heavily involved in the business, political and civic community in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Company believes Mr. Kabbash’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his management and operational expertise from years spent as a professional realtor, investor and consultant.

Executive Officers of the Company

Matthew A. Switzer has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank since January 2021. Mr. Switzer served as Managing Director at Stephens, Inc. from June 2015 to January 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Switzer served at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, a Stifel Company, from July 2005 to May 2015, most recently as Managing Director.

Marie T. Leibson has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company and the Bank since 2021. Ms. Leibson served as Executive Vice President and Chief SBA Lending Officer of the Company and the Bank from 2018 until 2020. Ms. Leibson served as Senior Vice President and Senior Lending Officer of the Bank from 2005 until 2018. Ms. Leibson previously served as Vice President of Commercial and SBA Lending at Southern Financial Bank from 1995 until 2004.

G. Cody Sheflett, Jr. has served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer of the Company and the Bank since February 2019. Mr. Sheflett has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Company and the Bank since April 2017, and served as Senior Vice President of Information Technology of the Bank

9

​

from September 2014 until April 2017, and Vice President Information Systems from December 2010 until September 2014. During his 25-year banking career, Mr. Sheflett served in progressively senior roles with previous financial institutions since joining the Company in 2010. Mr. Sheflett has a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science, and serves on the Virginia Bankers Association’s Operations and Technology Committee.

Stephen B. Weber has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of the Company and the Bank since April 2020. Mr. Weber served as Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Development of Ameris Bank from 2019 to 2020. Mr. Weber served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Ameris Bank from 2008 to 2019. Mr. Weber previously served as Vice President and Corporate Treasury Desk Manager of SunTrust Bank from 2003 to 2008.

​

10

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors held eleven (11) meetings during 2022. There was no director who attended less than 75% of the aggregate of the (1) total number of meetings of the Board and (2) total number of meetings held by Board committees on which he or she served. Each director is expected to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to company matters to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, including by attending annual and special meetings of the stockholders of the Company, the Board and committees of which he or she is a member.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Cook became the Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Bank on March 31, 2020, upon the retirement of Georgia S. Derrico. Currently, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions are separated, with Mr. Zember currently serving as the President and Chief Executive Office of both the Company and the Bank. The role of the Chief Executive Officer is to set the strategic direction for the Company and manage its performance, while the Chairman of the Board is tasked with setting the agenda for Board meetings and presiding over meetings of the Board. The Board of Directors believes bifurcating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as doing so best positions the Company to carry out its strategic plan for core growth and enhanced performance; provides for greater accountability and transparency; enhances oversight of operations; and provides for greater Board involvement.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board, as a whole and also at the committee level, plays an active role in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. The Board regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s asset quality, securities portfolio, capital, liquidity, cybersecurity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. The Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements as well as overseeing succession planning. The Audit Committee oversees management of financial and regulatory risks. The Corporate Governance Committee manages environmental, social, and governance risks including risks associated with members of the Board of Directors, independence, and competence. The Asset-Liability Management Committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the management of risks regarding the Bank’s policies and procedures related to investments in securities, liquidity and interest sensitivity. The Enterprise Risk Committee has oversight of the enterprise-wide risk management framework and includes the strategies, policies, procedures, assessments and systems established and maintained by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the Company's material risks. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

Oversight of Cybersecurity Risk

Information security is a significant operational risk for financial institutions, and includes the risk of losses resulting from cyber-attacks. The Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, clients, and employees, and devotes significant time and attention to oversight of cybersecurity and information security risk as a result. In light of these risks, the Board devotes attention to oversight of cybersecurity and assesses the risks and changes in the cyber environment through presentations and reports provided to our Board on a quarterly basis. The Board has primary responsibility for this oversight. In this capacity, the Board oversees the Company’s processes for identifying, assessing, monitoring and managing cybersecurity risk.

Committees of the Board of Directors of the Company

The Board of Directors of the Company has four committees, the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee, each of which is described below.

11

​

Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are currently Robert Y. Clagett (Chairman), John F. Biagas, W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), Deborah B. Diaz, and Eric A. Johnson, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has determined that all of the Audit Committee members have the financial knowledge, business experience and independent judgment necessary for service on the Audit Committee. The Board has further determined that Robert Y. Clagett has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC, and has the financial literacy and accounting or financial qualifications and experience to provide effective oversight of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, the functions of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in its oversight of:

In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee, among other things:

The Audit Committee’s meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and with the Bank’s internal auditors, in each case without the presence of the Company’s or the Bank’s management. The Audit Committee met eight (8) times during 2022.

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with both management and the independent registered public accountants all annual and quarterly financial statements prior to their issuance. During 2022, management of the Company advised the Audit Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee.

Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board regarding the membership of the Board, including:

12

​

The Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

The members of the Corporate Governance Committee are currently W. Rand Cook (Chairman), Deborah B. Diaz, F. L. Garrett, III, Charles A. Kabbash, and Eric A. Johnson, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards. The Corporate Governance Committee met three (3) times in 2022.

Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee are currently John F. Biagas (Chairman), Robert Y. Clagett, W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), and F.L. Garrett, III, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Company’s compensation programs, reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Bank’s senior management, which includes the Company’s named executive officers, evaluating the performance of senior management and determining and approving the compensation level for the Chief Executive Officer, and making recommendations regarding compensation of other executive officers and certain compensation plans to the Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for the oversight of succession planning for the Company and the Bank. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the committee. In 2022, the Compensation Committee met six (6) times. In 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer (the “Consultant”) to provide advice with respect to executive officer and director compensation for 2022. The Consultant periodically attended the Compensation Committee’s meetings, including executive sessions, and provided information and advice independent of management and, at the direction of the Compensation Committee Chairman, assisted management with various activities that support the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of the Consultant in light of the SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards and concluded that the work of the Consultant did not raise any conflicts of interest. The Consultant did not provide any services to the Company other than executive compensation-related services. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below.

Enterprise Risk Committee. The members of the Enterprise Risk Committee are currently John M. Eggemeyer (Chairman), Deborah B. Diaz, Dr. Allen Jones, Jr., and W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as set forth in Rule 5605(c)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and any applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Enterprise Risk Committee has been established to approve and periodically review the Company's risk management policies and to oversee the implementation of the Company's enterprise-wide risk management framework. The enterprise-wide risk management framework includes the strategies, policies, procedures, assessments and systems established and maintained by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the Company's material risks. In addition, the Enterprise Risk Committee coordinates with the Audit Committee of the Boards for reviewing the Company's financial and operational risks, corporate-wide compliance and other areas of Audit Committee responsibility or with the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committees of the Boards for review of compensation-related risks. The Enterprise Risk Committee met four (4) times in 2022.

​

13

​

Committees of the Board of Directors of the Bank

The Board of Directors of the Bank (the “Bank Board”) has one committee, the Asset-Liability Management Committee, which is described below.

Asset-Liability Management Committee. The members of the Asset-Liability Management Committee are currently W. Rand Cook, F.L. Garrett, III, Charles A. Kabbash and Dennis J. Zember, Jr. Six non-director executive officers also serve as members of the Asset-Liability Management Committee: the Bank’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Treasurer and Chief Strategy Officer. The Asset-Liability Management Committee ensures that the Bank’s investment policies and procedures are adequate and that the Bank’s investments in securities are consistent with the guidelines established in the Bank’s policies and comply with applicable laws and regulations. The committee evaluates the performance of the securities portfolio to ensure that the Bank’s objectives with respect to diversification, liquidity, and quality are met. While management is responsible for purchase decisions with respect to investment securities, the Asset-Liability Management Committee is responsible for reviewing and ratifying management’s investment transactions. The Asset-Liability Management Committee is also responsible for reviewing the entire balance sheet to ensure that products and funding sources adhere to the Board’s policies relating to asset-liability and interest rate risk management. The Asset-Liability Management Committee met four (4) times in 2022.

Board and Director Evaluations

The Board of Directors as a whole, and Directors as individuals, have been subject to evaluation for effectiveness from time to time.  In 2023, the Board intends to adopt the following framework to ensure regular review:

​

​

​

The Board has not established term limits or a mandatory age of retirement but anticipates the preceding framework will result in regular Board refreshment over time.  Through the work of the Corporate Governance Committee, Board refreshment will utilize the nomination process outlined while pursuing the diversity goals highlighted below.

Director Nominations Process

The Corporate Governance Committee considers nominees to serve as directors of the Company and recommends such persons to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee also considers director candidates recommended by stockholders if such candidates appear to be qualified to serve on the Board of Directors and meet the criteria for nominees considered by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance Committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of the Board. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Corporate Governance Committee’s resources, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider only those

14

​

director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below in the section entitled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.”

Criteria for Director Nominees.

The Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a set of criteria that it considers when it selects individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee considers the following criteria in selecting nominees: financial expertise and business experience; familiarity with and participation in the local community and the nominee’s ability to refer business to the Company; integrity, honesty and reputation; dedication to the Company and its stockholders, including the nominee’s ownership of the Company’s common stock; independence; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee deems relevant, including age, size of the Board of Directors and regulatory disclosure obligations.

The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board and the Corporate Governance Committee believe that it is essential that the Board members represent diverse viewpoints, background, experience, gender, race, skill set and other demographics. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge, and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The diversity of the Board is evaluated on a continuing basis by assessing whether varying viewpoints are routinely presented, evaluating the individual performance and contributions of each Director, and ensuring that varying perspectives are presented on key issues.

The Corporate Governance Committee may weigh the foregoing criteria differently in different situations, depending on the composition of the Board at the time. The Audit Committee maintains at least one director who meets the definition of “audit committee financial expert” under the regulations of the SEC.

In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee considers and reviews an existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance; length of Board service; experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the Board; and independence.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees.

Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Committee Charter, as approved by the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the process relating to director nominations, including identifying, interviewing and selecting individuals who may be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The process that the Corporate Governance Committee follows when it identifies and evaluates individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors is set forth below.

Identification. For purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee will rely on personal contacts of the members of the Board of Directors as well as their knowledge of members of the Bank’s local communities. The Corporate Governance Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with the policy and procedures set forth below in the paragraph entitled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.” The Corporate Governance Committee has not historically used an independent search firm in identifying nominees, although it may utilize such search firms in the future.

Evaluation. In evaluating potential nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee determines whether the candidate is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of Directors by evaluating the candidate under the selection criteria set forth above. In addition, for any new director nominee, the Corporate Governance Committee will conduct a background check of the individual and interview the candidate. After evaluating the candidate(s), the Corporate Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board. The full Board interviews the final candidate(s) before making a decision. A director and officer questionnaire is completed by the candidate(s) after their selection.

15

​

Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders

Any stockholder of the Company may nominate one or more persons for election as a director of the Company at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the prior notice and information provisions contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. In order for a director nomination to be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Company must be received at the Company’s offices not later than the 90^th day prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting. To submit a nomination of a director candidate, a stockholder must submit the following information in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Corporate Secretary, at 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060:

A nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures may not be eligible to be voted upon by the stockholders at the meeting.

If the Corporate Governance Committee receives a director nomination from a stockholder or group of stockholders who (individually or in the aggregate) beneficially own more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock for at least one year as of the date of such recommendation, the Company, as required by applicable securities law, will identify the candidate and stockholder or group of stockholders recommending the candidate and will disclose in its proxy statement whether the Corporate Governance Committee chose to nominate the candidate, as well as certain other information.

Stockholder Communications with Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meeting

The Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications received from stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to them in care of Cheryl Wood, Corporate Secretary, 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of the Audit Committee. Other concerns will also generally be referred to the Audit Committee.

In addition, the Board of Directors encourages directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Nine Company directors attended the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 26, 2022.

16

​

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Board designed the Code in an effort to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest, full, fair and accurate disclosure in filings and other public communications made by the Company, compliance with applicable laws, prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics, and accountability for adherence to the Code. The Code of Ethics is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

Director Independence

During the review by the Company’s Board of Directors of director independence, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” below. The Board also considered whether there were any transactions or relationships between directors or any member of their immediate family (or any entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an executive officer, general partner or significant equity holder) and members of the Company’s senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions existed that were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the Company’s current directors, with the exception of Dennis J. Zember, Jr., are independent directors as defined by the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Mr. Zember is considered to be an “inside” director because of his employment as a senior executive of the Company. The independent directors of the Company hold executive sessions from time to time without the Chief Executive Officer or any other member of management present.

Board Diversity Matrix

Our Board views its diversity as an important strength, as our commitment to diversity of experience, gender, and ethnicity is a key driver of the Corporation’s success. The following matrix illustrates the diversity of the Board as of the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

​

17

​

In addition to the valuable perspectives resulting from the diversity of gender and ethnicity on the Board, the Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that there is diversity of thought among directors, resulting in more thorough analysis of each issue and better decisions, which in the long-term results in greater shareholder value. The Board and Corporate Governance Committee believes that diversity of thought stems from many factors including professional experience, life experience, socio-economic background, gender, race, religion, skill set, and geographic representation. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge, abilities, and shareholder and community representation that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

The Company understands the importance of conducting our business in a manner that aims to be sustainable, while trying to promote positive social impacts and transparent governance practices. It is important to us to build formal ESG programs for the Company and to demonstrate how Primis’ culture helps shape our service to all of our stakeholders. We recognize the magnitude of ESG in today’s marketplace and want to aim to do our part. In 2022, we continued to build sustainability infrastructure and practices in support of positive societal impacts, ESG factors, and transparency.

We believe that our Board of Directors play an important oversight role in assessing our ESG practices at Primis and understanding the various risks and potential impact of ESG issues on our businesses. ESG practices at Primis are monitored by our Board of Directors and through committees at the executive leadership level. While our Corporate Governance Committee reviews many of the issues within the scope of ESG matters, other Board Committees receive regular updates with respect to matters more directly related to the scope of the work of those particular committees. For instance, our Compensation Committee receives periodic updates on our diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and human capital strategy. Our Board reviews cybersecurity risks, environmental risks to our businesses—including the potential risks associated with climate change—and oversees ESG risk management initiatives and activities.

In 2022, we further enhanced our commitment to ESG progress.  We filled two important positions: a Director of Corporate Social Responsibility and a Director of CRA (“Community Reinvestment Act”) Compliance.  Our Director of Corporate Social Responsibility has overall responsibility for guiding the Bank’s community engagement as well as oversight of Primis Works, the single-mother internship program started in 2021.  Our Director of CRA Compliance further focuses on our products, services and engagement with low to moderate income areas where we bank.  Through their efforts, and the efforts of the Board, management and the broader Primis community, 2022 saw the following accomplishments:

Volunteerism, Sponsorship and Donation

​

Empowering Women and Girls

​

18

​

​

Sharpening Minds for all Generations

​

​

​

​

​

19

​

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Appropriate compensation is critical to attracting, retaining and motivating directors who have the qualities necessary to serve the Corporation as a director and who meet the guidelines set forth by our Governance Committee.  The following discusses the Company’s approach to director compensation.

Stock Ownership Policy

In December of 2022, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for directors of the Company to further align the Board’s long-term interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.  Before their third anniversary as a board member, directors must own unencumbered shares with a minimum value equal to 100% of the average annual board compensation.

To encourage further stock ownership by its directors, the Bank maintains a stock matching program pursuant to which it funds the purchase of additional shares of Company common stock on behalf of a director in an amount equal to 125% of the shares of Company common stock otherwise purchased by the director, up to an annual value of $25,000 per director.

2022 Director Fees

In 2022, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors received an annual retainer of $30,000 and the chairman of each board committee received an additional annual retainer of $2,500, in each case payable quarterly. During 2022, all board meetings of the Company and the Bank were joint meetings, with the Chairman of the Board receiving $2,000 per meeting attended and each non-employee director receiving $1,000 per meeting attended. For special meetings of the Company and the Bank, all non-employee directors received $1,000 per meeting attended. For all committee meetings, the non-employee directors received $700 per meeting attended. Each non-employee director of the Bank and the Company also receives reimbursement for any travel, food and lodging expenses. Directors who are also employees of the Company or the Bank received no additional compensation for their service as a director.

2022 Director Compensation⁽¹⁾

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of the directors of the Company and the Bank for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The named executive officers who also serve (or served) as directors did not receive any compensation for their service as directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

​

20

​

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section discusses the Company’s compensation program, including how it relates to the executive officers named in the compensation tables that follow (who we sometimes refer to below and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement as the “named executive officers”). The executive officers of the Company currently hold the same executive officer positions with the Bank and all executive compensation is paid by the Bank for services performed by executives of the Bank. Accordingly, the following discussion of executive compensation relates to the compensation by the Bank to executives of the Bank.

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, retain and motivate key employees and enable those persons to participate in the long-term success of the Company while also advancing the interests of our stockholders. As such, the compensation program is designed to provide levels of compensation which are reflective of both the individual’s and the organization’s performance in achieving certain goals and objectives and in helping to build value for our stockholders. Set forth below is an analysis of our compensation program, the material compensation policy decisions we have made under this program and the material factors that we considered in making those decisions. Our named executive officers (the “NEOs”) are:

​

21

​

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for developing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s executive compensation policies. John F. Biagas, Robert Y. Clagett, W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), and F.L. Garrett III serve on the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee, along with the Board, has reviewed the compensation policies and practices for all employees and concluded that any risks arising from such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The fundamental objectives of the Bank’s executive compensation policies are to ensure that Bank executives are provided incentives and compensated in a way that advances both the short- and long-term interests of stockholders while also ensuring that the Company and the Bank are able to attract, retain and motivate executive management talent. Accordingly, compensation is based on: (1) the employee’s individual performance and his or her ability to lead the Company and the Bank to achieve their respective financial goals, (2) the Company’s consolidated financial performance and (3) compensation compared to peer institutions’ executive compensation. In making decisions with respect to any element of an executive officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the total compensation that may be awarded to the executive officer, including salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to award compensation that is reasonable when all elements of potential compensation are considered.

The Compensation Committee believes tying compensation to Company performance is critical for ensuring management alignment with shareholders, particularly for CEO compensation.  Over the past few years, the Committee has made substantial progress increasing the proportion of performance-based compensation, as highlighted by the charts of CEO compensation for 2022 versus 2019 below:

Setting Executive Compensation

In reviewing the 2022 compensation of each of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed all components of his or her respective compensation, including base salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviewed each executive officer’s compensation history and performance information and the market data discussed below.

22

​

Role of Compensation Consultant and Market Data

As discussed earlier in this Proxy Statement, in 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged the Consultant to provide advice with respect to executive officer and director compensation for 2022.

The Consultant reviewed a peer group comprised of 24 mid-Atlantic U.S. banks ranging in assets from $2.3 billion to $6.0 billion, with median assets of $3.2 billion and median market cap of $406 million. The peer group consisted of the following banks: ACNB Corporation, American National Bankshares, Blue Ridge Bankshares, C&F Financial Corporation, Capital City Bank Group, CapStar Financial Holdings, Carter Bankshares, City Holding, CNB Financial, Codorus Valley Bancorp, Colony Bankcorp, Community Financial Corporation, First Community Bancshares, HomeTrust Bancshares, MetroCity Bankshares, Mid Penn Bancorp, MVB Financial, Orrstown Financial Services, Peoples Financial Services, SmartFinancial Inc., Southern First Bancshares, Summit Financial Group, Shore Bancshares, Inc. and First Bank. The Consultant reviewed base salary, total cash compensation, targeted total cash compensation and targeted total direct compensation of our executive officers as compared to the peer group.

The Company did not benchmark the compensation of its named executive officers to a certain percentage or range of compensation within the market data provided by the Consultant. Instead, the Compensation Committee used this information as a point of reference for measurement, but not as the determinative factor in setting the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation Committee did not use the compensation data to “target” a specific compensation level for any given executive. Rather, the Compensation Committee used its understanding of peer group compensation as a starting point for its decision making.

Because the comparative compensation information is just one of the analytical tools that are used in setting named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee has discretion in determining the nature and extent of its use. Further, given the limitations associated with comparative pay information for setting individual executive compensation, including the difficulty of assessing and comparing wealth accumulation through equity gains and post-employment amounts, the Compensation Committee may elect not to use the comparative compensation information at all in the course of making compensation decisions.

Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation

In early 2022, the Compensation Committee made all decisions with respect to compensation of Mr. Zember, subject to review and approval by the full Board of Directors. Mr. Zember reviewed the performance of the Company’s executive officers (other than himself) and, based on that review, recommended to the Compensation Committee amounts payable to such other executive officers, including the other named executive officers. Mr. Zember was not involved with any aspect of determining his own pay.

Consideration of Last Year’s Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

At the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 87% of the shares represented and entitled to vote at the annual meeting were voted to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as discussed and disclosed in the 2022 Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee concluded that the results of the advisory say-on-pay vote reflected stockholder support of our compensation program. In light of this support, the Compensation Committee did not make material changes to our executive compensation program.

Components of Executive Compensation

The principal components of the executive compensation program of the Company (through the Bank) are:

23

​

Base Salary

Salaries provide executive officers with a base level of monthly income and help achieve the objectives outlined above by attracting and retaining strong talent. Generally, base salaries are not based on specific measures of corporate performance, but are determined by tenure of service, scope of the position, including current job responsibilities, relative salaries of the Company’s peers and the officer’s individual performance and contribution to the Company. The Company’s base salaries are adjusted based on factors such as individual experience, individual performance, individual potential, cost of living considerations and specific issues particular to the Company as well as the Compensation Committee’s subjective judgment. The Compensation Committee monitors the base salary levels and the various incentives of the named executive officers of the Company to ensure that overall compensation is consistent with the Company’s objectives and remains competitive within the area of the Company’s operations.

Effective March 1, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to the base salary of the following executive officers: Mr. Zember, 3.5% to $642,735; Mr. Switzer, 5.0% to $315,000; Ms. Leibson, 3.5% to $289,800; Mr. Sheflett, 19.7% to $284,993 and Mr. Weber, 2.0% to $306,000.

Non-Equity Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee spent considerable time in 2022, in coordination with the full Board of Directors and the CEO, aligning targets for incentive pay with the Company’s short-term goals. In 2022, the Compensation Committee established the following goals with high and low ranges of achievement around the target and with each goal weighted equally:

​

​

24

​

Targets incentive percentages of base salary were determined for executive management. These targets combined with the payout ranges above would determine short-term incentives. The following table shows the target incentive payout levels for each named executive assuming midpoint performance on the established goals:

​

As noted above, actual results relative to 2022 goals implied a payout of 109% of targeted incentive amounts for the year.  However, the Compensation Committee noted that, while progress on multiple strategic initiatives was made in 2022, net income for the year was below expectations primarily as a result of higher than expected net charge-offs.  As a result, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to lower incentive payments for executive management to what the Committee believed were more appropriate levels.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

The Company maintains an equity compensation program for its named executive officers and other key employees, in order to attract, retain and motivate key employees and enable those persons to participate in the long-term success of the Company. In 2021, the Compensation Committee began including performance-based grants in management’s long-term equity incentive awards to increase the alignment of management incentives with long-term goals versus time-based grants alone. In 2022, the Compensation Committee chose to make all awards performance-based.  The performance-based restricted stock units are convertible, on a one-for-one basis, into shares of stock based on the level of achievement of the Company’s adjusted earnings per share compound annual growth over the 5-year performance period commencing the year of the grant. The following table details the performance targets and payout levels for the 2021 and 2022 performance unit grants.

​

Perquisites and Employee Benefit Plans

Perquisites represent a small part of the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews annually the perquisites provided to the named executive officers, and offers such benefits after consideration of the business need. The named executive officers are eligible to participate in the same employee benefits plans that are generally available to all Company employees.

25

​

Employment Agreements, Change-in-Control Agreements and Executive Severance Plan

During 2022, the Company and the Bank were party to employment agreements and change-in-control agreements with some of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Bank believe that the employment and change-in-control agreements are a critical tool in retaining our executive team. These agreements also include certain protections for the Company and the Bank in the form of post-employment restrictive covenants.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Zember. Effective December 20, 2022, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Zember, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. The amended and restated agreement amends and restates in its entirety the original employment agreement with Mr. Zember, dated February 19, 2020 (the “Original Employment Agreement”). The amended and restated employment agreement is substantially the same as the Original Employment Agreement, except as described herein. Pursuant to the amended and restated agreement, Mr. Zember’s base salary was set at $642,735 to align with his 2022 base salary, with eligibility for annual increases at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, and the Company committed to providing Mr. Zember life insurance in the amount of $5,000,000, with fifty percent (50%) of the proceeds directed to the Company and fifty percent (50%) of the proceeds directed to Mr. Zember’s designated beneficiary. The amended and restated agreement also provides that if Mr. Zember’s employment is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason following a change in control, then his performance-based equity awards will be deemed to have been earned as of his termination date based upon the actual level of achievement of all relevant performance goals measured as of the date of such termination.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Switzer. Effective January 10, 2021, the Company was party to an employment agreement with Mr. Switzer, pursuant to which Mr. Switzer serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement has an initial two-year term that would expire on January 10, 2023, subject to automatic two-year renewals unless either party provided written notice of non-renewal no later than sixty days before any renewal date. Mr. Switzer’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary and eligibility for equity awards and annual bonuses and certain other benefits, and payment of private club dues. Mr. Switzer’s employment agreement also provided that any incentive compensation paid to Mr. Switzer, including both equity and cash incentive compensation, is subject to repayment or clawback as further described in the agreement.

Change-in-Control Agreement with Mr. Sheflett. On March 24, 2019, the Company entered into a change-in-control agreement with Mr. Sheflett. The change-in-control agreement will terminate on the earliest of (i) the satisfaction of the Company’s severance obligations to Mr. Sheflett following his termination of employment due to a qualifying termination (a termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 60 days before, or one-year following, a change in control, as such terms are defined in the change-in-control agreement), (ii) the date of Mr. Sheflett’s termination of employment for any reason other than a qualifying termination or (iii) the first anniversary of a change in control. In the event of a qualifying termination, (i) Mr. Sheflett will receive an amount equal to 1½ times his base salary in effect immediately prior to the qualifying termination, payable during the 18-month period immediately following the date of termination in approximately equal installments, and (ii) for 12 months following his termination of employment, or such earlier time that he becomes eligible to receive group health benefits under a program of a subsequent employer or otherwise, the Company will pay to Mr. Sheflett an amount in cash equal to the excess of (x) the COBRA cost of continued coverage in the group health plan over (y) the amount that he would have had to pay for such coverage if he had remained employed during such 12-month period and paid the active employee rate for such coverage. In addition, Mr. Sheflett’s outstanding options and restricted stock will become fully-vested and exercisable as of the date of such termination. The severance benefits are conditioned upon Mr. Sheflett’s execution and non-revocation of a separation and full release of claims/covenant not to sue agreement. The change-in-control agreement also contains customary confidentiality covenants, as well as covenants regarding the non-solicitation of customer and employees and non-competition that apply for twelve months following the executive’s termination of employment.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Weber. Effective April 29, 2020, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Weber, pursuant to which Mr. Weber serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement has an initial three-year term that would expire on April 29, 2023, subject to automatic two-year renewals unless either party provided written notice of non-renewal no later than

26

​

sixty days before any renewal date. Mr. Weber’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary and eligibility for equity awards and annual bonuses and certain other benefits, and payment of private club dues. Mr. Weber’s employment agreement also provided that any incentive compensation paid to Mr. Weber, including both equity and cash incentive compensation, is subject to repayment or clawback as further described in the agreement. See “Potential Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control,” below, for additional information regarding Mr. Weber’s employment agreement.

Executive Severance Plan.  The Company maintains an Executive Severance Plan, which it assumed from EVBS in connection with the merger in June 2017 and continues to maintain. For purposes of the Plan, an “Executive” means any officer at the Executive Vice President Level or higher employed by the Company or the Bank, provided in any event that an employee who has an employment agreement with the Company or the Bank is not eligible to participate in the Plan.

​

​

​

27

​

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate this Proxy Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in whole or in part, the following report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

​

​

​

28

​

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation paid or accrued by the Company to or on behalf of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020.

29

​

​

30

​

2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table contains information about the named executive officers’ grants of stock units during 2022, all of which were granted under the 2017 Plan. No stock options were granted during 2022.

​

31

​

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table contains information concerning the named executive officers’ outstanding stock options, stock awards and stock units as of December 31, 2022.