Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance.  They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties.  Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this supplemental package.  We also note the following forward-looking statements: in the case of our development and redevelopment projects, the estimated completion date, estimated project cost and cost to complete; and estimates of future capital expenditures, dividends to common and preferred shareholders and operating partnership distributions. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict.  For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2016. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this supplemental package.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as applicable, and this supplemental package.

 

The financial supplement includes various non-GAAP financial measures.  Descriptions of these non-GAAP measures are provided below. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided on pages 60 to 74.

 

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) and Net Operating Income (“NOI”) (the equivalent of EBITDA on a cash basis) - We calculate EBITDA and NOI on an Operating Partnership basis which is before allocation to the noncontrolling interest of the Operating Partnership.  We consider EBITDA the primary non-GAAP financial measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. We also consider NOI a key non-GAAP financial measure. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of NOI, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to those of our peers. EBITDA and NOI should not be considered substitutes for net income. EBITDA and NOI may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

 

Funds From Operations (“FFO”) - FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”).  NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of depreciated real estate assets, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets and other specified non-cash items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries.  FFO and FFO per diluted share are non-GAAP financial measures used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions.  FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure.  FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

 

Funds Available For Distributions (“FAD”) - FAD is defined as FFO less (i) cash basis recurring tenant improvements, leasing commissions and capital expenditures, (ii) straight-line rents and amortization of acquired below-market leases, net, and (iii) other non-cash income, plus (iv) other non-cash charges.  FAD is a non-GAAP financial measure that is not intended to represent cash flow and is not indicative of cash flow provided by operating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP. FAD is presented solely as a supplemental disclosure that management believes provides useful information regarding the Company's ability to fund its dividends.

 

 

 

Washington, DC Spin-off

 

On July 17, 2017, we completed the spin-off of our Washington, DC segment comprised of (i) 37 office properties totaling over 11.1 million square feet, five multifamily properties with 3,133 units and five other assets totaling approximately 406,000 square feet and (ii) 18 future development assets totaling over 10.4 million square feet of estimated potential development density, and $275.0 million of cash to JBG SMITH Properties (“JBGS”).  On July 18, 2017, JBGS was combined with the management business and certain Washington, DC assets of The JBG Companies (“JBG”), a Washington, DC real estate company.  Steven Roth, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado, is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of JBGS.  Mitchell Schear, former President of our Washington, DC business, is a member of the Board of Trustees of JBGS.  We are providing transition services to JBGS initially including information technology, financial reporting and payroll services. The spin-off was effected through a tax-free distribution by Vornado to the holders of Vornado common shares of all of the common shares of JBGS at the rate of one JBGS common share for every two common shares of Vornado and the distribution by the Operating Partnership to the holders of its common units of all of the outstanding common units of JBG SMITH Properties LP (“JBGSLP”) at the rate of one JBGSLP common unit for every two common units of VRLP held of record.  See JBGS’ Amendment No. 3 on Form 10 (File No. 001-37994) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 2017 for additional information. Beginning in the third quarter of 2017, the historical financial results of our Washington, DC segment will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

 

Financing Activities

 

On June 1, 2017, Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX), in which we have a 32.4% ownership interest, completed a $500,000,000 refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 0.90% (2.06% at June 30, 2017) and matures in June 2020 with four one-year extension options. In connection therewith, Alexander’s purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6%.  The property was previously encumbered by a $300,000,000 interest-only mortgage at LIBOR plus 0.95% which was scheduled to mature in March 2021.

 

On June 20, 2017, we completed a $220,000,000 financing of The Bartlett, a 699-unit residential building with a 39,000 square foot Whole Foods Market at its base, located in Arlington, Virginia.  The five-year interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 1.70% (2.90% at June 30, 2017), and matures in June 2022.  On July 17, 2017, the property, the loan and the $217,000,000 of net proceeds were transferred to JBGS in connection with the tax-free spin-off of our Washington, DC segment.

 

On July 19, 2017, the joint venture, in which we have a 25% interest, completed a $500,000,000 refinancing of 330 Madison Avenue, an 845,000 square foot Manhattan office building.  The seven-year interest only loan matures in August 2024 and has a fixed rate of 3.43%.  Our share of net proceeds, after repayment of the existing LIBOR plus 1.30% $150,000,000 mortgage and closing costs, was approximately $85,000,000.

 

 

 

Other Activities

 

Farley Post Office Joint Venture

 

In September 2016, our 50.1% joint venture with the Related Companies (“Related”) was designated by Empire State Development (“ESD”), an entity of New York State to redevelop the historic Farley Post Office building.  The building will include a new Moynihan Train Hall and approximately 850,000 rentable square feet of commercial space, comprised of approximately 730,000 square feet of office space and approximately 120,000 square feet of retail space.  On June 15, 2017, the joint venture closed a 99-year, triple-net lease with ESD for the commercial space at the Farley Post Office building and made a $230,000,000 upfront contribution, of which our share is $115,230,000, towards the construction of the train hall. The lease calls for annual rent payments of $5,000,000 plus payments in lieu of real estate taxes. Simultaneously, the joint venture completed a $271,000,000 loan facility, with an initial advance of $202,299,000.  The interest only loan is at LIBOR plus 3.25% (4.41% at June 30, 2017) and matures in June 2019 with two one-year extension options.

 

The joint venture has also entered into a development agreement with ESD and a design-build contract with Skanska Moynihan Train Hall Builders.  Under the development agreement with ESD, the joint venture is obligated to build the Moynihan Train Hall, with Vornado and Related each guaranteeing the joint venture’s obligations.  Under the design-build agreement, Skanska Moynihan Train Hall Builders is obligated to fulfill all of the joint venture’s obligations.  The obligations of Skanska Moynihan Train Hall Builders have been bonded by Skanska USA and bears a full guaranty from Skanska AB.

 

Mezzanine Loan – New York

 

On May 9, 2017, a $150,000,000 mezzanine loan owned by a joint venture in which we have a 33.3% ownership interest was repaid at its maturity and we received our $50,000,000 share. The mezzanine loan earned interest at LIBOR plus 9.42%.

 

Sterling Suffolk Racecourse, LLC (“Suffolk Downs JV”)

 

On May 26, 2017, Suffolk Downs JV, a joint venture in which we have a 21.2% equity interest, sold the property comprising the Suffolk Downs race track in East Boston, Massachusetts (“Suffolk Downs”) for $155,000,000, which resulted in net proceeds and a net gain to us of $15,314,000.  In addition, we were repaid $29,318,000 of principal and $6,129,000 of accrued interest on our debt investments in Suffolk Downs JV, resulting in a net gain of $11,373,000.