10-Q 1 a06-15805_110q.htm QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(D)

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

ý

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

 

 

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

 

OR

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

 

 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                     to                    

 

Commission File Number 001-14841

 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

84-1352233

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(IRS Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

1515 Arapahoe Street, Tower 2, Suite 700, Denver, Colorado 80202

 (Address of principal executive offices)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  303-925-9200

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes  ý    No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

 

o

 

Accelerated filer

 

ý

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Yes  o    No  ý

 

The registrant had 11,955,006 shares of common stock, $0.01 per share par value, outstanding as of July 14, 2006.

 

 



 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2006

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

 

Glossary of Terms

 

Bbl/d

 

barrels of oil per day

Btu

 

British thermal units, an energy measurement

Gal/d

 

gallons per day

Mcf

 

thousand cubic feet of natural gas

Mcf/d

 

thousand cubic feet of natural gas per day

MMBtu

 

million British thermal units, an energy measurement

MMcf

 

million cubic feet of natural gas

MMcf/d

 

million cubic feet of natural gas per day

Net operating margin (a non-GAAP financial measure)

 

revenues less purchased product costs

NGL

 

natural gas liquids, such as propane, butanes and natural gasoline

 

2



 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited, in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

26,272

 

$

20,968

 

Marketable securities

 

6,527

 

6,070

 

Receivables, net of allowances of $165 and $175, respectively

 

86,848

 

145,539

 

Inventories

 

47,891

 

41,067

 

Other current assets

 

22,554

 

16,314

 

Total current assets

 

190,092

 

229,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

599,146

 

573,198

 

Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment

 

(93,312

)

(78,500

)

Total property, plant and equipment, net

 

505,834

 

494,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in Starfish

 

57,211

 

39,167

 

Intangible assets, net

 

339,440

 

346,496

 

Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6,127 and $4,424, respectively

 

17,042

 

18,463

 

Deferred contract cost, net of accumulated amortization of $546 and $390, respectively

 

2,704

 

2,860

 

Investment in and advances to other equity investee

 

183

 

182

 

Other long-term assets

 

2,001

 

326

 

Notes receivable from related parties

 

130

 

154

 

Total other assets

 

418,711

 

407,648

 

Total assets

 

$

1,114,637

 

$

1,132,304

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable (including related party payables of $0 and $25, respectively)

 

$

96,237

 

$

119,105

 

Accrued liabilities

 

45,157

 

45,869

 

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

15,764

 

728

 

Deferred taxes

 

533

 

362

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

460

 

2,738

 

Total current liabilities

 

158,151

 

168,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

4,383

 

3,487

 

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

658

 

 

 

Debt

 

593,628

 

608,762

 

Other

 

14,203

 

10,256

 

Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiary

 

305,651

 

301,015

 

Total liabilities

 

1,076,674

 

1,092,322

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity (December 31, 2005 adjusted to reflect May 23, 2006 Stock Dividend, See Note 2):

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, par value $0.01, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.01, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 11,958,758 and 11,943,733 shares issued, respectively

 

120

 

119

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

44,958

 

48,786

 

Deferred compensation

 

 

(398

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(7,725

)

(8,425

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

644

 

357

 

Treasury stock, 3,834 and 55,619 shares, respectively

 

(34

)

(457

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

37,963

 

39,982

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,114,637

 

$

1,132,304

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

186,590

 

$

141,280

 

$

427,470

 

$

279,540

 

Derivatives

 

(13,057

)

(240

)

(14,316

)

(147

)

Total revenue

 

173,533

 

141,040

 

413,154

 

279,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

116,858

 

112,354

 

298,025

 

217,053

 

Facility expenses

 

14,217

 

10,985

 

27,921

 

20,245

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

13,061

 

9,125

 

24,437

 

17,227

 

Depreciation

 

7,778

 

4,995

 

15,156

 

9,736

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

4,027

 

2,095

 

8,043

 

4,190

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligations

 

26

 

11

 

51

 

21

 

Total operating expenses

 

155,967

 

139,565

 

373,633

 

268,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

17,566

 

1,475

 

39,521

 

10,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

1,228

 

989

 

2,173

 

990

 

Interest income

 

436

 

321

 

842

 

570

 

Interest expense

 

(10,798

)

(4,588

)

(21,842

)

(8,293

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(859

)

(558

)

(1,684

)

(1,094

)

Dividend income

 

109

 

96

 

215

 

188

 

Miscellaneous income

 

1,517

 

148

 

3,759

 

235

 

Income (loss) from operations before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

9,199

 

(2,117

)

22,984

 

3,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

(64

)

 

429

 

 

Deferred

 

6

 

802

 

(896

)

32

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(58

)

802

 

(467

)

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

(11,273

)

(294

)

(21,817

)

(3,619

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(2,132

)

$

(1,609

)

$

700

 

$

(70

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.18

)

$

(0.14

)

$

0.06

 

$

(0.01

)

Diluted

 

$

(0.18

)

$

(0.14

)

$

0.06

 

$

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock (December 31, 2005 adjusted to reflect May 23, 2006 Stock Dividend, see Note 2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

11,936

 

11,861

 

11,921

 

11,852

 

Diluted

 

11,936

 

11,861

 

12,046

 

11,852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.24

 

$

0.091

 

$

0.415

 

$

0.182

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(2,132

)

$

(1,609

)

$

700

 

$

(70

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of tax of $56, $166, $171 and $115, respectively.

 

94

 

275

 

287

 

191

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivative instruments accounted for as hedges, net of tax of $0, $420, $0 and $(122), respectively.

 

 

556

 

 

(197

)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

94

 

831

 

287

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(2,038

)

$

(778

)

$

987

 

$

(76

)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

Shares of
Common
Stock

 

Shares of
Treasury
Stock

 

Common
Stock

 

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 

Deferred
Compensation

 

Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)

 

Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Treasury
Stock

 

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2005

 

10,858

 

(56

)

$

108

 

$

48,797

 

$

(398

)

$

(8,425

)

$

357

 

$

(457

)

$

39,982

 

May 23, 2006 Stock Dividend Adjustment (Note 2)

 

1,085

 

 

11

 

(11

)

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted December 31, 2005

 

11,943

 

(56

)

119

 

48,786

 

(398

)

(8,425

)

357

 

(457

)

39,982

 

Stock option exercises

 

12

 

18

 

1

 

63

 

 

 

 

166

 

230

 

Compensation expense related to equity-based awards

 

 

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

 

 

211

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

1

 

34

 

 

(257

)

 

 

 

257

 

 

Cashless stock option exercises

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification of unearned compensation related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (Note 2)

 

 

 

 

(398

)

398

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

700

 

 

 

700

 

Dividend

 

 

 

 

(3,447

)

 

 

 

 

(3,447

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

287

 

 

287

 

Balance, June 30, 2006

 

11,959

 

(4

)

$

120

 

$

44,958

 

$

 

$

(7,725

)

$

644

 

$

(34

)

$

37,963

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

700

 

$

(70

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

15,156

 

9,736

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

8,043

 

4,190

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

1,684

 

1,094

 

Amortization of gas contract

 

156

 

156

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

51

 

21

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

21,817

 

3,619

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

 

(2,173

)

(351

)

Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative instruments

 

14,378

 

(734

)

Deferred taxes

 

896

 

(32

)

Stock option compensation expense

 

35

 

979

 

Restricted stock compensation expense

 

176

 

34

 

Restricted unit compensation expense

 

571

 

665

 

Participation Plan compensation expense

 

3,944

 

2,790

 

Contribution of treasury shares to 401(k) benefit plan

 

 

168

 

Imputed interest on debt securities

 

 

(52

)

Gain from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

(421

)

(161

)

Gain from sale of marketable securities

 

 

(56

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of working capital acquired in acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

53,691

 

15,834

 

Inventories

 

(6,824

)

109

 

Other assets

 

(4,924

)

(1,825

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(20,448

)

(10,802

)

Other long-term liabilities

 

86

 

200

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

86,594

 

25,512

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of marketable securities

 

 

(8,725

)

Proceeds from sale of marketable securities

 

 

3,603

 

Additional Javelina acquisition costs

 

(6,582

)

 

Capital expenditures

 

(25,685

)

(31,442

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

499

 

162

 

Investment in Starfish

 

(15,872

)

(41,688

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(47,640

)

(78,090

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

56,800

 

65,000

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(74,212

)

 

Payments for deferred financing costs and registration costs

 

(459

)

(95

)

Collection of related party notes receivable

 

24

 

53

 

Proceeds from MarkWest Energy’s private placement, net

 

5,000

 

 

Distributions to MarkWest Energy unitholders

 

(17,586

)

(12,865

)

Payment of dividends

 

(3,447

)

(1,886

)

Exercise of stock options

 

230

 

66

 

Purchase of treasury shares

 

 

(161

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(33,650

)

50,112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

5,304

 

(2,466

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

20,968

 

12,844

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

26,272

 

$

10,378

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest and income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized

 

$

19,823

 

$

8,013

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

584

 

$

523

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred offering costs payable

 

 

 

 

 

Construction projects in progress

 

$

1,072

 

$

3,003

 

Accrued financing costs

 

$

1,580

 

$

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



 

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. Organization

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (“MarkWest Hydrocarbon” or the “Company”) is an energy company primarily focused on marketing natural gas liquids (NGLs) and increasing shareholder value by growing MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (“MarkWest Energy Partners” or the “Partnership”), a consolidated subsidiary and publicly-traded master limited partnership. MarkWest Energy Partners is engaged in the gathering, processing and transmission of natural gas; the transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids; and the gathering and transportation of crude oil. The Company also markets natural gas and NGLs. MarkWest Hydrocarbon and MarkWest Energy Partners provide services primarily in Appalachia, Michigan, Texas, Oklahoma, Gulf Coast and other areas of the southwest.

 

2. Basis of Presentation

 

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. Equity investments in which we exercise significant influence but where we do not control and are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for using the equity method.

 

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In management’s opinion, we have made all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods shown. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. In addition to reviewing these condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, you should also consult the audited financial statements and notes that makes up the Company’s December 31, 2005, Annual Report on Form 10-K. Finally, consider that results for the six months ended June 30, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year 2006, or any other future period.

 

On April 27, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon announced that its Board of Directors approved the issuance of one share of common stock for each ten shares of common stock held by common stockholders. The stock was issued on May 23, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 11, 2006; the ex-dividend rate was May 9, 2006. 1,084,647 shares were issued at a fair value of $24.4 million, based upon the last sale price on the record date ($22.50 per share). Cash of $3,200 was paid in lieu of fractional shares, based upon the last sale price on the record date. All common stock accounts and per share data have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the dividend of our common stock.

 

Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans

 

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation on January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Company elected to measure compensation expense for equity-based employee compensation plans as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.

 

Under SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense is based on the fair value of the award. SFAS No. 123R classifies stock-based compensation as either equity or liability awards. The fair value on the date of grant for an award classified as equity is recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an individual is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The requisite service period is estimated based on an analysis of the terms of the share-based payment award. Compensation expense for a liability award is based on the award’s fair value, remeasured at each reporting date until the date of settlement. Additionally, compensation expense is reduced by 4.6% for an estimate of expected award forfeitures.

 

Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the intrinsic value (typically the difference between the equity-based instrument to be received and the cost to acquire that equity-based instrument). APB No. 25 classified stock-based compensation as either fixed or variable awards. The intrinsic value on the date of grant for an award classified as fixed is recognized over the requisite service period. Compensation expense for variable awards is based on the award’s intrinsic value, remeasured at each reporting date until the date of settlement.

 

Compensation expense under each plan is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

8



 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

Stock Options

 

Stock options are issued under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and 1996 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan.  Under SFAS No. 123R, the plans are categorized as equity awards. Under APB No. 25, the plans were categorized as variable awards.

 

Restricted Stock

 

The Company also issues restricted stock, for no consideration, under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and 1996 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan.  Upon settlement, the individual receives common stock of the Company. Under SFAS No. 123R, the restricted stock qualifies as an equity award, and under APB No. 25 qualified as a fixed award.

 

Participation Plan

 

The Company has also entered into arrangements with certain directors and employees of the Company referred to as the Participation Plan.  Under this plan, the Company sells subordinated partnership units of the Partnership or interests in the Partnership’s general partner, under a purchase and sale agreement.  As the formula used to determine the sale and buy-back price is not based on independent third party valuation, coupled with the attributes of the put-and-call provisions, these transactions are considered compensatory arrangements. The general partner interests have no definite term, but historically have been settled for cash when the employee leaves the Company. The subordinated units convert to common units after a holding period; however, historically, management has settled some subordinated units for cash when individuals left the Company. The subordinated partnership units of the Partnership were also sold to the employees and directors based on a formula that may not necessarily fully reflect fair value, thus the subordinated units are considered compensatory. Under SFAS 123R, the subordinated units and general partner interests are classified as liability awards, while under APB No. 25, they were classified as variable awards.

 

Under Topic 1-B of the codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletins, Allocation of Expenses And Related Disclosure in Financial Statements of Subsidiaries, Divisions or Lesser Business Components of Another Entity, some portion of compensation expense related to services provided by MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s employees and directors recognized under the Participation Plan should be allocated to the Partnership.  The allocation is based on the percent of time that each employee devotes to the Company.  Compensation attributable to interests that were sold to individuals who serve on both the board of MarkWest Hydrocarbon and the Partnership’s Board of Directors is allocated equally.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

Restricted Units

 

The Partnership issues restricted units under the MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan.  A restricted unit is a “phantom” unit that entitles the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, cash equivalent to the value of a common unit.  The restricted units are treated as liability awards under SFAS No. 123R, and were treated as variable awards under APB No. 25.

 

To satisfy common unit awards, common units may be acquired on the open market, from the general partner or any other person, as well as from the issuance of new common units.  The cost of the common unit awards, therefore, will be borne by the Partnership.

 

Pro Formas

 

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based and unit-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates under those plans consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts listed below (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2005

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2005

 

Net loss, as reported

 

$

(1,609

)

$

(70

)

Add: compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effect

 

1,297

 

3,052

 

Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effect

 

(1,116

)

(2,405

)

Pro forma net income (loss)

 

$

(1,428

)

$

577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.01

)

Pro forma

 

$

(0.13

)

$

0.05

 

Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

As reported

 

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.01

)

Pro forma

 

$

(0.13

)

$

0.05

 

 

9



 

3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (“SFAS 155”). This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities and resolves issues addressed in SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets.”  This Statement: (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; (b) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133; (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate beneficial interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and, (e) eliminates restrictions on a qualifying special-purpose entity’s ability to hold passive derivative financial instruments that pertain to beneficial interests that are or contain a derivative financial instrument. The standard also requires presentation within the financial statements that identifies those hybrid financial instruments for which the fair value election has been applied and information on the income statement impact of the changes in fair value of those instruments. The Partnership is required to apply SFAS 155 to all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event beginning January 1, 2007, although early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS 155 is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Partnership.

 

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. FAS No. 156 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities by requiring that they be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements of operations or financial position.

 

In June 2006 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company.

 

4. Acquisitions by MarkWest Energy Partners

 

Javelina Acquisition

 

On November 1, 2005, the Partnership acquired equity interests in Javelina Company, Javelina Pipeline Company and Javelina Land Company, L.L.C., which were 40%, 40% and 20%, respectively, owned by subsidiaries of El Paso Corporation, Kerr-McGee Corporation and Valero Energy Corporation. The Partnership paid consideration of $357.0 million, plus $41.8 million for net working capital that included approximately $35.5 million in cash. The Corpus Christi, Texas, gas-processing facility treats and processes off-gas from six local refineries, two of which are owned by Valero Energy Corporation, two by Koch Industries, Inc. and two by Citgo Petroleum Corporation. Constructed in 1989 to recover up to 28,000 Bbl/d of NGLs, the facility currently processes approximately 125 to 130 MMcf/d of inlet gas and produces approximately 25,400 Bbl/d of NGLs. The Partnership completed its purchase price allocation in May 2006, including a final working capital settlement to the seller of $5.9 million.

 

Starfish Joint Venture

 

On March 31, 2005, the Partnership acquired a 50% non-operating membership interest in Starfish Pipeline

 

10



 

Company, LLC, (“Starfish”) from an affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. for $41.7 million. The Partnership financed the acquisition by borrowing $40.0 million from its credit facility during the first quarter of 2005. Starfish is a joint venture with Enbridge Offshore Pipelines LLC, which the Partnership accounts for using the equity method. Starfish owns the FERC-regulated Stingray natural gas pipeline, and the unregulated Triton natural gas-gathering system and West Cameron dehydration facility. All are located in the Gulf of Mexico and southwestern Louisiana.

 

The Partnership applies the equity method of accounting for its interests in Starfish. Summarized financial information for 100 percent of Starfish is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Revenues

 

$

7,483

 

$

5,012

 

$

12,579

 

$

11,544

 

Operating income

 

1,675

 

1,963

 

3,104

 

3,876

 

Net income

 

2,632

 

2,064

 

4,632

 

4,025

 

 

Pro Forma Results of Operations

 

The following table reflects the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as though the Starfish acquisition and the Javelina acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2005. The actual results for the six months ended June 30, 2006, are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. The pro forma amounts include certain adjustments, including recognition of depreciation based on the allocated purchase price of property and equipment, amortization of customer contracts, amortization of the excess Starfish purchase price over net book value, amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense.

 

The unaudited pro forma results do not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred had the entities been combined during the period presented, nor does it necessarily indicate the future results of the combined entities.

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2005

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2005

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Revenue

 

$

209,079

 

$

389,360

 

Net income

 

$

(3,081

)

$

(2,604

)

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.22

)

Diluted

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.22

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

11,861

 

11,852

 

Diluted

 

11,861

 

11,852

 

 

5. Other Long-Term Assets

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Accrued financing costs

 

$

1,675

 

$

 

Other

 

326

 

326

 

 

 

$

2,001

 

$

326

 

 

Accrued Financing Costs

 

Accrued financing costs at June 30, 2006, of $1.7 million relate to both a public offering of 3,000,000 common units and a private placement of $200 million aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Senior Notes that closed on July 6, 2006 (See Note 13).

 

6. Debt

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Credit Facility

 

 

 

 

 

Revolver facility, 8.75% interest at December 31, 2005, due January 30, 2007

 

$

 

$

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership Credit Facility

 

 

 

 

 

Term loan, 8.75% interest at December 31, 2005, due December 2010

 

364,088

 

365,000

 

Revolver facility, 8.75% interest at December 31, 2005, due December 2010

 

5,000

 

14,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership Senior Notes

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Notes, 6.875% interest, due November 2014

 

225,000

 

225,000

 

 

 

594,088

 

604,000

 

Less: obligations due in one year

 

(460

)

(2,738

)

Total long-term debt

 

$

593,628

 

$

601,262

 

 


 

(1)           The balance sheet classification of debt, between current and long-term, reflects the repayment of $318.6 million of the Partnership Credit Facility term loan, using proceeds from the debt and equity transactions, as further described in Note 13.

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

Credit Facility

 

On January 31, 2006, the Company entered into the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which provide a maximum lending limit of $25.0 million for a one-year term and which amended and restated the October 2004 agreement discussed below. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had $6.0 million of the availability committed to a letter of credit, leaving $19.0 million available for revolving loans.

 

The credit facility bears interest at a variable interest rate, plus basis points.  The variable interest rate is typically based on the London Inter Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”); however, in certain borrowing circumstances the rate would be based on the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5-1%, and b) a rate set by the Facility’s administrative agent, based on the U.S. prime rate. The basis points correspond to the ratio of the Revolver Facility Usage (as defined in the Company Credit Facility) to the Borrowing Base (as defined in the Company Credit Facility), ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% for Base Rate loans, and 1.75% to 2.75% for Eurodollar Rate loans. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the credit facility at an annual rate of 50.0 basis points.

 

11



 

Under the provisions of the Company Credit Facility, the Company is subject to a number of restrictions on its business, including restrictions on its ability to grant liens on assets; make or own certain investments; enter into any swap contracts other than in the ordinary course of business; merge, consolidate or sell assets; incur indebtedness (other than subordinated indebtedness); make distributions on equity investments; declare or make, directly or indirectly, any restricted distributions.

 

The credit facility also contains covenants requiring the Company to maintain:

 

                  a ratio of not more than 3.50 to 1.00 of total consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA for any fiscal quarter-end;

 

                  a minimum net worth of a) $34.0 million plus, b) 50% of consolidated net income (if positive) earned on or after October 1, 2005 plus, c) 100% of net proceeds of all equity issued by the Company subsequent to January 31, 2006; and

 

                  a minimum available cash and marketable securities reserve of $13.0 million, which is to be reduced to zero in the event the Company restructures a keep-whole contract with one of its significant customers.

 

On March 23, 2006, the Company amended the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to reduce the cash reserve requirement from $13.0 million to $5.0 million through December 31, 2006.

 

In October 2004, the Company entered into a $25.0 million senior credit facility with a term of one year.  The $25.0 million revolving facility had a variable interest rate based on the base rate, which is equal to the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus ½ of 1%, and b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent as its prime rate, plus the applicable rate, which is based on a utilization percentage.  In October, November, and December 2005, the Company entered into the first, second and third amendment to the credit agreement.  The first amendment extended the term of the original agreement to November 15, 2005.  The second amendment reduced the lending amount from $25.0 million to $16.0 million, of which $6.0 million of availability is committed to a letter of credit, leaving $10.0 million available for revolving loans.  The second amendment also extended the term of the revolving credit to December 30, 2005.  The third amendment extended the term of the revolving credit to January 31, 2006, and reduced the lending amount from $16.0 million to $13.5 million, of which $6.0 million of availability is committed to a letter of credit, leaving $7.5 million available for revolving loans, at December 31, 2005.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

Partnership Credit Facility

 

On December 29, 2005, MarkWest Energy Operating Company, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of MarkWest Energy Partners L.P., entered into the fifth amended and restated credit agreement (“Partnership Credit Facility”), which provides for a maximum lending limit of $615.0 million for a five-year term.  The credit facility includes a revolving facility of $250.0 million and a $365.0 million term loan.  The credit facility is guaranteed by the Partnership and all of the Partnership’s subsidiaries and is collateralized by substantially all of the Partnership’s assets and those of its subsidiaries.  The borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a variable interest rate, plus basis points.  The variable interest rate is typically based on the London Inter Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”); however, in certain borrowing circumstances the rate would be based on the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5 to 1.0%, and b) a rate set by the Facility’s administrative agent, based on the U.S. prime rate.  The basis points vary based on the ratio of the Partnership’s Consolidated Debt (as defined in the Partnership Credit Facility) to Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership Credit Facility), ranging from 0.50% to 1.50% for Base Rate loans, and 1.50% to 2.50% for Eurodollar Rate loans.  The basis points will increase by 0.50% during any period (not to exceed 270 days) where the Partnership makes an acquisition for a purchase price in excess of $50.0 million (“Acquisition Adjustment Period”). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on the Partnership Credit Facility was 7.32% and 7.16%.

 

The balance sheet classification of debt, between current and long-term, reflects the repayment of $318.6 million of the Partnership Credit Facility term loan, using proceeds from the debt and equity transactions, as further described in Note 13.

 

2014 Senior Notes

 

In October 2004 the Partnership and its subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Finance Corporation, issued $225.0 million in senior notes (“2014 Senior Notes”) at a fixed rate of 6.875%, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, and commencing on May 1, 2005. The notes mature on November 2, 2014. The Partnership may redeem some or all of the notes at any time on or after November 1, 2009, at certain redemption prices together with accrued and unpaid interest to the

 

12



 

date of redemption. The Partnership may redeem all of the notes at any time prior to November 1, 2009, at a make-whole redemption price. In addition, prior to November 1, 2007, the Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a stated redemption price. The Partnership must offer to repurchase the notes at a specified price if it a) sells certain assets and does not reinvest the proceeds or repay senior indebtedness, or b) the Partnership experiences specific kinds of changes in control. Each of the Partnership’s existing subsidiaries, other than MarkWest Energy Finance Corporation, has guaranteed the notes jointly and severally, and fully and unconditionally. The notes are senior unsecured obligations equal in right of payment with all of the Partnership’s existing and future senior debt. They are senior in right of payment to all of the Partnership’s future subordinated debt but effectively junior in right of payment to its secured debt to the extent of the assets securing the debt, including the Partnership’s obligations in respect of its Partnership Credit Facility. The proceeds from these notes were used to pay down the Partnership’s outstanding debt under its credit facility.

 

The indenture governing the 2014 Senior Notes includes certain limitations on the activities of the Partnership and its restricted subsidiaries. Limitations include the ability of the Partnership and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; declare or pay dividends or distributions, or redeem, repurchase or retire equity interests or subordinated indebtedness; make investments; incur liens; create any consensual limitation on the ability of the Partnership’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or transfer property to the Partnership; engage in transactions with the Partnership’s affiliates; sell assets, including equity interests of the Partnership’s subsidiaries; make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem, defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value any subordinated obligation or guarantor subordination obligation (except principal and interest at maturity); and consolidate, merge or transfer assets. Subject to compliance with certain covenants, the Partnership may issue additional notes from time to time under the indenture pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

The Partnership agreed to file an exchange offer registration statement or, under certain circumstances, a shelf registration statement, pursuant to a registration rights agreement relating to the 2014 Senior Notes. The Partnership failed to complete the exchange offer in the time provided for in the subscription agreements (April 26, 2005) and, as a consequence, is incurring an interest rate penalty of 0.5% annually, increasing 0.25% every 90 days thereafter up to 1%, until such time as the exchange offer was completed. The registration statement was filed on January 17, 2006, the exchange offer was completed on March 7, 2006, and the interest penalty ceased.

 

7. Derivative Financial Instruments
 

Commodity Instruments

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon and MarkWest Energy utilizes a combination of fixed-price forward contracts, fixed-for-floating price swaps and options available in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market, and futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”).  The Company and the Partnership enter into OTC swaps with financial institutions and other energy company counterparties.  Management conducts a standard credit review on counterparties and has agreements containing collateral requirements where deemed necessary.  The Company and the Partnership use standardized agreements that allow for offset of positive and negative exposures.  Some of the agreements may require margin deposit.

 

The use of derivative instruments may create exposure to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances when (i) NGLs do not trade at historical levels relative to crude oil, (ii) sales volumes are less than expected, requiring market purchases to meet commitments, or (iii) our OTC counterparties fail to purchase or deliver the contracted quantities of natural gas, NGLs or crude oil or otherwise fail to perform.  To the extent that the Company, or the Partnership, engage in derivative activities, they may be prevented from realizing the benefits of favorable price changes in the physical market; however, they are similarly insulated against unfavorable changes in such prices.

 

Both the Company and the Partnership have a committee, which is comprised of the senior management team that oversees all of the derivative activity.

 

Fair value is based on available market information for the particular derivative instrument, and incorporates the commodity, period, volume and pricing.  Positive (negative) amounts represent unrealized gains (losses).

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon may enter into physical and/or financial positions to manage its risks related to commodity price exposure for its Standalone segment. Due to timing of purchases and sales, direct exposure to price volatility can be created, because there is no longer an offsetting purchase or sale that remains exposed to market pricing.  Through marketing and derivatives activities, direct exposure may occur naturally, or we may choose direct exposure when we favor that exposure over frac spread risk.

 

13



 

The following table summarizes the derivative positions specific to MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s Standalone segment at June 30, 2006:

 

Swaps

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed Price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Propane - 6.4 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

$

0.93

 

$

(1,734

)

Propane - 1.8 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.10

 

(190

)

Propane - 1.9 Mm Gal

 

Nov 2006 - Feb 2007

 

1.10

 

(200

)

Propane - 3.0 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Feb 2007

 

1.09

 

(341

)

Propane - 2.8 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.18

 

(100

)

Propane - 6.2 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.10

 

(684

)

Propane - 6.4 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

0.96

 

(1,543

)

Propane - 1.6 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.12

 

(145

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iso-butane - 0.6 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.22

 

(91

)

Iso-butane - 0.7 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.12

 

(208

)

Iso-butane - 0.3 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.35

 

(28

)

Iso-butane - 0.6 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.16

 

(155

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal butane - 1.9 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.21

 

(245

)

Normal butane - 2.0 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.10

 

(500

)

Normal butane - 1.1 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.29

 

(77

)

Normal butane - 1.7 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.13

 

(375

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gasoline - 1.3 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.50

 

(94

)

Natural gasoline - 2.1 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.44

 

(277

)

Natural gasoline - 1.3 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.39

 

(255

)

Natural gasoline - 1.0 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.59

 

33

 

Natural gasoline - 1.1 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.37

 

(200

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas - 0.9 Mm Mmbtu

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

6.61

 

(267

)

Natural gas - 0.4 Mm Mmbtu

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

6.43

 

(51

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,727

)

Other

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

Total MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

 

 

$

(7,655

)

 

The impact of MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s commodity derivative instruments on results of operations and financial position are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2006

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2006

 

Unrealized losses – revenue

 

$

(6,156

)

$

(7,655

)

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

Unrealized gains – other current assets

 

$

185

 

$

 

Unrealized loss – current liability

 

 

(7,840

)

 

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

The Partnership’s primary risk management objective is to reduce volatility in its cash flows arising from changes in commodity prices related to future sales of natural gas, NGLs and crude.  Swaps and futures contracts may allow the Partnership to reduce volatility in its margins, because losses or gains on the derivative instruments are generally offset by corresponding gains or losses in the Partnership’s physical positions.

 

The following table includes information on MarkWest Energy’s specific derivative positions at June 30, 2006:

 

14



 

Costless collars

 

Contract Period

 

Floor

 

Cap

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Crude Oil - 500 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

57.00

 

$

67.00

 

$

(849

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

57.00

 

67.00

 

(424

)

Crude Oil - 205 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

57.00

 

65.10

 

(409

)

Crude Oil - 78 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

67.50

 

77.30

 

(27

)

Crude Oil - 155 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

67.50

 

78.55

 

(121

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

67.50

 

79.15

 

(175

)

Crude Oil - 200 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

70.00

 

75.95

 

(175

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Propane - 20,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

0.90

 

0.99

 

(737

)

Propane - 10,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

0.97

 

1.15

 

(132

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ethane - 22,950 Gal/d

 

2006

 

0.65

 

0.80

 

(198

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural Gas - 1,575 Mmbtu/d

 

2006

 

8.67

 

10.86

 

803

 

Natural Gas - 1,575 Mmbtu/d

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

9.00

 

12.50

 

128

 

Natural Gas - 400 Mmbtu/d

 

2007

 

8.25

 

10.03

 

36

 

Natural Gas - 1,500 Mmbtu/d

 

Apr-Dec 2007

 

7.25

 

10.25

 

147

 

Natural Gas - 1,500 Mmbtu/d

 

Jan-Mar 2008

 

8.00

 

11.29

 

(42

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,175

)

 

Swaps

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

62.00

 

$

(614

)

Crude Oil - 185 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

61.00

 

(487

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

65.30

 

(926

)

Crude Oil - 140 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

74.10

 

(94

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Propane - 5,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

1.08

 

(104

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas

 

Jun-Oct 2006

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,207

)

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Future purchase / sale contracts

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Natural Gas - 1.7 million Mmbtu (purchase)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

$

6.07

 

$

(1,349

)

Ethane - 10.8 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

0.61

 

(910

)

Propane - 4.9 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

1.07

 

(596

)

Other NGLs - 4.2 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

1.40

 

(214

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,069

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total MarkWest Energy Partners

 

$

(7,451

)

 

The impact of The Partnership’s commodity derivative instruments on results of operations and financial position are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Realized gains (losses) – revenue

 

$

(476

)

$

(251

)

$

63

 

$

(209

)

Unrealized gains (losses) – revenue

 

(6,425

)

11

 

(6,724

)

62

 

Other comprehensive income – changes in fair value

 

 

438

 

 

247

 

Other comprehensive income - settlement

 

 

(222

)

 

(180

)

 

15



 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

Unrealized gains – other current assets

 

$

1,131

 

$

 

Unrealized losses – current liability

 

(7,924

)

(728

)

Unrealized losses – non-current liability

 

(658

 

 

8. Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under SFAS No. 109, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of any tax rate change on deferred taxes is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change. Realizability of deferred tax assets is assessed and, if not more likely than not, a valuation allowance is recorded to write down the deferred tax assets to their net realizable value.

 

The Company bases the effective corporate tax rate for interim periods on the estimated annual effective corporate tax rate. Income tax expense totaled less than $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39.9%. Income tax benefit totaled $0.8 million and less than $0.1 million for the comparable periods in 2005, resulting in an effective tax rate of 31.7%. The change in the annual effective tax rate is attributable to the newly passed Texas margin tax, which increases the rate, as discussed below, and is slightly offset by the utilization of various state net operating losses (“NOL”) and the corresponding change in the state NOL valuation allowance. The estimated annual effective rate for MarkWest Hydrocarbon as a stand-alone entity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 32.4%. However, due to the enactment of the new Texas law and the corresponding establishment of the deferred taxes of MarkWest Energy Partners, the effective rate for the consolidated group increased to 39.9%.

 

The Texas legislature recently passed House Bill 3, 79th Leg., 3d C.S. (2006) ("H.B.3") that was signed into law on May 18, 2006. H.B. 3 significantly reforms the Texas franchise tax system and replaces it with a new Texas margin tax system. The margin tax expands the type of entities subject to tax to generally include all active business entities. The new margin tax will apply to common entity types that are not currently subject to tax including general and limited partnerships. The effective date of the margin tax is January 1, 2008, but the tax generally will be imposed on gross margin generated in 2007 and thereafter.

 

Based on this new law, the Partnership recorded a deferred tax liability of $679,000, related to temporary differences that are expected to reverse in future periods.   MarkWest Hydrocarbon recorded a corresponding deferred tax asset of $47,500 for its proportionate share, as it will receive a current tax benefit when the taxes are actually paid.

 

9. Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans

 

All previously awarded stock, options and all other compensation arrangements based on the market value of our common stock have been adjusted to reflect the stock dividend of one share of common stock for each ten shares of common stock held paid in May 2006.

 

Total compensation cost for share-based pay arrangements was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Stock options

 

$

13

 

$

259

 

$

35

 

$

979

 

Restricted stock

 

77

 

20

 

176

 

41

 

General partner interests

 

2,464

 

1,071

 

3,973

 

2,716

 

Subordinated units

 

(16

)

99

 

(29

)

61

 

Restricted units

 

113

 

435

 

571

 

665

 

Total compensation cost

 

2,651

 

1,884

 

4,726

 

4,462

 

Income tax benefit

 

(994

)

(707

)

(1,772

)

(1,673

)

Net compensation cost

 

$

1,657

 

$

1,177

 

$

2,954

 

$

2,789

 

 

16



 

The following summarizes the total compensation cost as of June 30, 2006, related to nonvested awards not yet recognized. The actual compensation cost recognized might differ for the restricted units, as they qualify as liability awards, which are impacted by changes in the fair value.

 

 

 

Amount
(in thousands)

 

Weighted-average
Remaining
Vesting Period
(years)

 

Stock options

 

$

55

 

1.4

 

Restricted stock

 

547

 

2.4

 

Restricted units

 

1,302

 

2.1

 

Total

 

$

1,904

 

 

 

 

At June 30, 2006, the Company has five stock-based compensation plans, one of which is through its consolidated subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Partners. These plans are described below.

 

Stock Options

 

Stock options are issued under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and 1996 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan.  The options vest over a service period of from three to five years. The options have a maximum term of ten years. At the discretion of the Company, the holder may use Company-assisted or broker-assisted cashless exercise. The Company may grant options to its employees for up to 925,000 shares of common stock.  At June 30, 2006, there were approximately 214,000 options available for grant under this plan. The Company may grant options to its non-employee directors for up to 30,000 shares of common stock. On June 15, 2006, shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the Company to grant 1,000,000 shares. The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan became effective on July 1, 2006.

 

The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  No options were granted in 2006 or 2005.

 

Under SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense is based on the fair value of the stock options, reduced for an estimate of expected forfeitures (4.6% in the second quarter of 2006).

 

The following summarizes the impact of the Company’s stock option plans (in thousands of units):

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Options exercised, cashless

 

 

2

 

7

 

24

 

Shares issued, cashless

 

 

1

 

4

 

14

 

Options exercised, cash

 

23

 

6

 

30

 

34

 

Shares issued, cash

 

23

 

6

 

30

 

34

 

 

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 are presented below.

 

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted-
average Exercise
Price

 

Weighted-average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)

 

Aggregate Intrinsic
Value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2005

 

125,409

 

$

7.52

 

7

 

$

1,565,891

 

Changes during the year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(37,541

)

6.88

 

6

 

559,371

 

Forfeited

 

(908

)

10.59

 

9

 

9,407

 

Expired

 

(597

)

8.54

 

6

 

7,383

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

 

86,363

 

$

7.76

 

6

 

1,467,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2006

 

53,768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2005

 

78,362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17



 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Total fair value of options vested during the period

 

$

47,749

 

$

47,760

 

$

67,186

 

$

112,451

 

Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the period

 

$

346,743

 

$

88,155

 

$

559,371

 

$

427,768

 

 

Restricted Stock

 

The Company also issues restricted stock, for no consideration, under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and 1996 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan.  The restricted stock vests over a service period of three years. The fair value of restricted stock is determined on the date of grant, based on the fair value of the common stock. The holder of restricted stock receives dividends as though the shares were unrestricted. Upon settlement, the individual receives common stock of the Company. Under SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense is based on the fair value, reduced for an estimate of expected forfeitures (4.6% in the second quarter of 2006). On June 15, 2006, shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the Company to grant 1,000,000 shares. The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan became effective on July 1, 2006.

 

The following summarizes the impact of the Company’s restricted stock plans:

 

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted-average
Grant-date Fair
Value

 

Nonvested at January 1, 2006

 

24,937

 

$

19.31

 

Granted

 

17,209

 

21.82

 

Vested

 

(2,556

)

17.42

 

Forfeited

 

(303

)

17.42

 

Nonvested at June 30, 2006

 

39,287

 

20.55

 

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted during the period

 

$

375,500

 

$

133,559

 

Total fair value of restricted stock vested during the period / total intrinsic value of restricted stock settled during the period

 

$

44,526

 

$

 

 

During the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, the Company did not grant any shares of restricted stock, nor were there any vestings of restricted shares. The Company received no proceeds for issuing restricted stock, and there were no cash settlements during the same periods.

 

Participation Plan

 

The Company has also entered into arrangements with certain directors and employees of the Company referred to as the Participation Plan.  Under it, the Company sells subordinated partnership units of the Partnership or interests in the Partnership’s general partner under a purchase and sale agreement.  There is no vesting period or maximum contractual term under the Participation Plan. The Company’s capacity to grant further general partner interests is limited by its ownership in the general partner.

 

The subordinated units are sold without any restrictions on transfer.   Compensation expense is based on changes in the market value of the subordinated units. No subordinated units were sold to employees or directors in 2006 or 2005.  MarkWest Hydrocarbon reacquired no subordinated units in 2006 or 2005.

 

The interest in the Partnership’s general partner is sold with certain put-and-call provisions that allow the individuals to require MarkWest Hydrocarbon to buy back, or require the individuals to sell back their interest in the general partner to MarkWest Hydrocarbon.  Specifically, the employees and directors can exercise their put if (1) MarkWest Hydrocarbon or the Partnership’s general partner undergoes a change of control; (2) additional membership interests are issued that, on a pro forma basis, decrease the distributions to all the then existing members; (3) any amendment, alteration or repeal of the provisions of the general partner agreement materially and adversely affects the then existing rights, duties, obligations or restrictions of the employees and directors; or (4) the employee or director (i) becomes totally disabled while a director, officer or employee of the general partner, of MarkWest Hydrocarbon or of any of their affiliates, or (ii) dies, or (iii) retires as a director, officer or employee of the general partner of MarkWest Hydrocarbon or of any of their affiliates after reaching

 

18



 

the age of 60 years.  The employee or his estate has 120 days after the put event to exercise the put under (4) and 30 days after notice to exercise under (1) through (3).  MarkWest Hydrocarbon can exercise its call option if the employee or director ceases to be a director or employee of MarkWest Hydrocarbon or any of its affiliates, or if there is a change of control.  MarkWest Hydrocarbon can exercise its call option if (i) the employee or director ceases to be a director or employee of MarkWest Hydrocarbon or any of its affiliates, or (ii) if there is a change of control of MarkWest or of the Partnership’s general partner. For the call option based upon a termination of employment or directorship, MarkWest Hydrocarbon has 12 months following the termination date to exercise its call option. MarkWest Hydrocarbon has agreed to exempt the general partner interests of three present or former directors from the call option based upon a termination of employment or directorship. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Semple’s employment agreement with MarkWest Hydrocarbon, 66% of his general partner interest has become exempt from the call option based upon a termination of employment or directorship for reasons other than cause, and the remaining 34% will likewise become exempt after November 1, 2006. For the call option based upon a change of control of MarkWest or of the Partnership’s general partner, MarkWest Hydrocarbon has 30 days following the change of control to exercise its call option.

 

As the formula used to determine the sale and buy-back price is not based on an independent third-party valuation, coupled with the attributes of the put-and-call provisions, these transactions are considered compensatory arrangements, similar to a stock appreciation right. Compensation expense related to general partner interests is calculated as the difference in the formula value and the amount paid by those individuals.  The formula value is the amount MarkWest Hydrocarbon would have to pay the employees and directors to repurchase the general partner interests, and is based on the current market value of the Partnership’s common units and the current quarterly distributions paid.  During the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not receive or distribute any monies for the issuance or repurchase of general partner interests.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

The general partner has adopted the MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan for employees and directors of the general partner, as well as employees of its affiliates who perform services for us. The plan consists of restricted units and unit options. It currently permits the grant of awards covering an aggregate of 500,000 common units, comprised of 200,000 restricted units and 300,000 unit options. The Compensation Committee of the general partner’s Board of Directors administers the plan.

 

Restricted Units. A restricted unit is a “phantom” unit that entitles the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, cash equivalent to the value of a common unit.  The restricted units vest over a service period of three to four years; however, vesting for certain awards accelerates if specific annualized distribution goals are met. During the vesting period, these restricted units are entitled to receive distribution equivalents, which represent cash equal to the amount of distributions made on common units.

 

The following is a summary of restricted units issued under the Partnership’s Long-Term Incentive Plan:

 

 

 

Number of units

 

Weighted-
average grant-date
fair value

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2005

 

38,864

 

$

45.60

 

Granted

 

30,293

 

46.64

 

Vested

 

(9,643

)

46.44

 

Forfeited

 

(895

)

45.85

 

Non-vested at June 30, 2006

 

58,619

 

$

46.00

 

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted units granted during the period

 

$

 

$

322,605

 

$

1,412,933

 

$

708,599

 

Total fair value of restricted units vested during the period / total intrinsic value of restricted units settled during the period

 

 

101,995

 

447,841

 

69,025

 

 

During the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership received no proceeds for issuing restricted units, and there were no cash settlements.

 

Of the total number of restricted units that vested in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, the Partnership did not redeem any restricted units for cash. It issued 9,643 common units in 2006. In 2005 the Partnership issued 8,850 common units and acquired 250 more common units in the open market.

 

19



 

Unit Options. The Compensation Committee has the authority to make grants of unit options under the plan to employees and directors containing such terms as the committee shall determine. Unit options are exercisable over a period determined by the Compensation Committee. Unit options also are exercisable upon a change in control of us, the general partner, MarkWest Hydrocarbon or upon the achievement of specified financial objectives.

 

As of June 30, 2006, the Partnership had not granted common unit options.

 

10. Dividends Paid to Shareholders

 

Stock Dividend

 

On April 27, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon announced that its Board of Directors approved the issuance of one share of common stock for each ten shares of common stock held by common stockholders. The stock was issued on May 23, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 11, 2006; the ex-dividend rate was May 9, 2006. 1,084,647 shares were issued at a fair value of $24.4 million, based upon the last sale price on the record date ($22.50 per share). Cash of $3,200 was paid in lieu of fractional shares, based upon the last sale price on the record date.

 

Cash Dividends

 

On January 26, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share, payable on February 22, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 15, 2006. The ex-dividend date was February 13, 2006.

 

On April 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.175 per share, an increase of $0.10 per share from the same period of 2005, payable on June 5, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 26, 2006. The ex-dividend date was May 24, 2006

 

On July 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share, payable on August 21, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 14, 2006. The ex-dividend date will be August 10, 2006.

 

11. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to a variety of risks and disputes normally to its business and is a party to various legal proceedings. We maintain insurance policies in amounts and with coverage and deductibles as we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, we cannot assure either that the insurance companies will promptly honor their policy obligations or that the coverage or levels of insurance will be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related to future claims for property loss or business interruption to the Company or for third party claims of personal and property damage, or that the coverages or levels of insurance it presently has will be available in the future at economical prices.

 

In early 2005 MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., the Partnership and several of its affiliates were served with two lawsuits, Ricky J. Conn, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al. (filed February 2, 2005), and Charles C. Reid, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al. (filed February 8, 2005), in Floyd Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Civil Action No. 05-CI-00137 and Civil Action No. 05-CI-00156, which actions on February 24, 2005, were removed to the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Pikeville Division. The Company, the Partnership and its affiliates were served with an additional lawsuit, Community Trust and Investment Co., et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al., filed November 7, 2005,in Floyd County Circuit Court, Kentucky, that added five new claimants but essentially alleged the same facts and claims as the earlier two suits. On March 27, 2006, the U.S. District Court remanded the cases back to Floyd County Circuit Court, Kentucky, and the cases were consolidated into Ricky J. Conn, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al., Floyd Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Civil Action No. 05-CI-00137.

 

These actions are for third-party claims of property and personal injury damages sustained as a consequence of an NGL pipeline leak and an ensuing explosion and fire that occurred on November 8, 2004. The pipeline was owned by an unrelated business entity and leased and operated by the Partnership’s subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Appalachia, LLC. It transports NGLs from the Maytown gas processing plant to the Partnership’s Siloam fractionator. The explosion and fire from the leaked vapors resulted in property damage to five homes and injuries to some of the residents. The pipeline owner, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (“OPS”), and the Partnership continue to investigate the incident. Discovery in the action is now underway following the remand back to state court. The trial is scheduled to begin

 

20



 

February 5, 2007.

 

The Company notified its general liability insurance carriers of the incident and the lawsuits in a timely manner and is coordinating its legal defense with the insurers. At this time, the Company believes that it has adequate general liability insurance coverage for third-party property damage and personal injury liability resulting from the incident. The Company has settled with several of the claimants for third-party property damage claims (damage to residences and personal property), and reached settlements for some of the personal injury claims. These have been paid for or reimbursed under the Company’s general liability insurance. As a result, the Company has not provided for a loss contingency.

 

Pursuant to OPS regulation mandates and to a Corrective Action Order issued by the OPS November 18, 2004, pipeline and valve integrity evaluation, testing and repairs were conducted on the affected pipeline segment before service could be resumed. OPS authorized a partial return to service of the affected pipeline in October 2005. MarkWest is in the process of applying for return to full service.

 

In late June 2006 a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty (NOPV) was issued by OPS to both MarkWest Hydrocarbon and the unaffiliated owner of the pipeline, with a proposed penalty in the aggregate amount of $1,070,000. Initial response to the NOPV is not due until at least September 1, 2006, and the Company is likely going to request an administrative hearing and settlement conference with respect to the NOPV.

 

Related to the above referenced pipeline incident, MarkWest Hydrocarbon and the Partnership have filed an independent action captioned MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., et al. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., et al. (District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado, Case No. 05CV3953 filed August 12, 2005), as removed to the (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-1948, on October 7, 2005), against its All-Risks Property and Business Interruption insurance carriers as a result of the companies’ refusal to honor their insurance coverage obligation to pay the Company for certain expenses related to the pipeline incident. These include the Company’s internal expenses and costs incurred for damage to, and loss of use of the pipeline, equipment and products; the extra transportation costs incurred for transporting the liquids while the pipeline was out of service; the reduced volumes of liquids that could be processed; and the costs of complying with the OPS Corrective Action Order (hydrostatic testing, repair/replacement and other pipeline integrity assurance measures). These expenses and costs have been expensed as incurred and any potential recovery from the All-Risks Property and Business Interruption insurance carriers will be treated as “other income” if and when it is received. The Company has not provided for a receivable for these claims because of the uncertainty as to whether and how much the Company will ultimately recover under the policies. The Company has also asserted that the cost of pipeline testing, replacement and repair are subject to an equitable sharing arrangement with its owner, pursuant to the terms of the pipeline lease agreement. Discovery in the action is continuing.

 

The Company has also been involved in a lawsuit captioned Ross Bros. Construction v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., (U.S. Court Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 05-6251). This lawsuit involved the expansion construction of the Siloam Kentucky gas processing and fractionation plant and a dispute as to the monetary value of work and additional work beyond the contract’s lump sum price performed by the contractor. This lawsuit involved a claim of approximately $0.7 million in extra costs. The Company was recently granted Summary Judgment on its defense asserting accord and satisfaction. In August 2005, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of the Summary Judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. The case was fully briefed and oral Argument to the 6th Circuit was heard on July 18, 2006, and we are awaiting the ruling from the Court. The Company believes that, while it is not able to predict the outcome of this matter, based on the judge’s discussion on the grant of the summary judgment and denial of Ross Brothers’ motion for reconsideration, it is probable that the Company will prevail in the appeal. As a result, the Company has not provided for a loss contingency.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is a party to various other legal actions. In the opinion of management, none of these actions, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

 

Office Lease Obligation

 

The Partnership entered into a ten-year office lease and relocated its and MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.’s corporate headquarters to the Park Central Building, located in downtown Denver, Colorado in July 2006. The lease provides for a tenant improvement allowance of up to approximately $1.8 million through December 31, 2006. A security deposit of $1.0 million was provided in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit. The future minimum lease payments of the new lease are as follows:

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

$

 

2007

 

927,442

 

2008

 

972,138

 

2009

 

1,016,834

 

2010

 

1,044,769

 

2011 and thereafter

 

5,983,677

 

Total

 

$

9,944,860

 

 

21



 

The Partnership’s principal executive office is currently located in a building leased by MarkWest Hydrocarbon.  A portion of the lease cost for that building historically had been allocated to the Partnership. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the Company incurred a liability associated with the cancelled lease of $1.3 million.

 

12. Segment Reporting

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s operations are classified into two reportable segments:

 

1.               MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone — The Company sells its equity and third-party NGLs, purchases third-party natural gas, and sells its equity and third-party natural gas. Since February 2004, the Company has been engaged in the wholesale propane marketing business through a third party agency agreement. In June of 2006, that agreement was terminated. The wholesale propane marketing was largely accomplished through an agency agreement with a third party, however in June of 2006 that agreement was terminated. MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone operates MarkWest Energy Partners, a publicly traded limited partnership.

 

2.               MarkWest Energy Partners — The Partnership is engaged in the gathering, processing and transmission of natural gas; the transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids; and the gathering and transportation of crude oil.

 

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on operating income.  There were no intersegment revenues prior to May 24, 2002.  The Company conducts its continuing operations in the United States.

 

The table below presents information about net income/(loss) for the reported segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Net income/(loss) for each segment includes total revenues minus purchased product costs, facility expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, accretion of asset retirement obligations and impairments and excludes interest income, interest expense, amortization of deferred financing costs, gain on sale of non-operating assets, non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary, miscellaneous income (expense) and income taxes.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses are allocated to the segments based on direct expenses incurred by the segments or allocated based on the percent of time that employees devote to the segment in accordance with the Partnership’s services agreement with the Company.

 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Three months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

62,189

 

$

142,280

 

$

(17,879

)

$

186,590

 

Derivatives

 

(6,156

)

(6,901

)

 

(13,057

)

Total Revenue

 

56,033

 

135,379

 

(17,879

)

173,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

52,606

 

76,178

 

(11,926

)

116,858

 

Facility expenses

 

4,705

 

15,465

 

(5,953

)

14,217

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

4,073

 

8,988

 

 

13,061

 

Depreciation

 

394

 

7,384

 

 

7,778

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,027

 

 

4,027

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

 

26

 

 

26

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(5,745

)

23,311

 

 

17,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

1,228

 

 

1,228

 

Interest income

 

177

 

259

 

 

436

 

Interest expense

 

(84

)

(10,714

)

 

(10,798

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(33

)

(826

)

 

(859

)

Dividend income

 

109

 

 

 

109

 

Miscellaneous income

 

2

 

1,515

 

 

1,517

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(5,574

)

14,773

 

 

9,199

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

78

 

(679

)

543

 

(58

)

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(11,273

)

(11,273

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(5,496

)

$

14,094

 

$

(10,730

)

$

(2,132

)

 

22



 

 

 

Markwest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

Markwest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Three months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

52,786

 

$

103,200

 

$

(14,706

)

$

141,280

 

Derivatives

 

 

(240

)

 

(240

)

Total Revenue

 

52,786

 

102,960

 

(14,706

)

141,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

47,729

 

73,862

 

(9,237

)

112,354

 

Facility expenses

 

5,094

 

11,360

 

(5,469

)

10,985

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

2,814

 

6,311

 

 

9,125

 

Depreciation

 

419

 

4,576

 

 

4,995

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

2,095

 

 

2,095

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

2

 

9

 

 

11

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(3,272

)

4,747

 

 

1,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

(1

)

990

 

 

989

 

Interest income

 

258

 

63

 

 

321

 

Interest expense

 

(30

)

(4,558

)

 

(4,588

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(61

)

(497

)

 

(558

)

Dividend income

 

96

 

 

 

96

 

Miscellaneous income

 

222

 

(74

)

 

148

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(2,788

)

671

 

 

(2,117

)

Income tax benefit

 

802

 

 

 

802

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(294

)

(294

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,986

)

$

671

 

$

(294

)

$

(1,609

)

 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

164,281

 

$

298,783

 

$

(35,594

)

$

427,470

 

Derivatives

 

(7,655

)

(6,661

)

 

(14,316

)

Total Revenue

 

156,626

 

292,122

 

(35,594

)

413,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

144,631

 

176,975

 

(23,581

)

298,025

 

Facility expenses

 

10,475

 

29,459

 

(12,013

)

27,921

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

7,111

 

17,326

 

 

24,437

 

Depreciation

 

599

 

14,557

 

 

15,156

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

8,043

 

 

8,043

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

 

51

 

 

51

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(6,190

)

45,711

 

 

39,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

2,173

 

 

2,173

 

Interest income

 

363

 

479

 

 

842

 

Interest expense

 

(152

)

(21,690

)

 

(21,842

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(50

)

(1,634

)

 

(1,684

)

Dividend income

 

215

 

 

 

215

 

Miscellaneous income

 

152

 

3,607

 

 

3,759

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(5,662

)

28,646

 

 

22,984

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(331

)

(679

)

543

 

(467

)

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(21,817

)

(21,817

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(5,993

)

$

27,967

 

$

(21,274

)

$

700

 

 

23



 

 

 

Markwest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

Markwest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

117,307

 

$

192,744

 

$

(30,511

)

$

279,540

 

Derivatives

 

 

(147

)

 

(147

)

Total Revenue

 

117,307

 

192,597

 

(30,511

)

279,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

101,550

 

134,647

 

(19,144

)

217,053

 

Facility expenses

 

10,921

 

20,691

 

(11,367

)

20,245

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

6,277

 

10,950

 

 

17,227

 

Depreciation

 

834

 

8,902

 

 

9,736

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,190

 

 

4,190

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

2

 

19

 

 

21

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(2,277

)

13,198

 

 

10,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

990

 

 

990

 

Interest income

 

440

 

130

 

 

570

 

Interest expense

 

(61

)

(8,232

)

 

(8,293

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(122

)

(972

)

 

(1,094

)

Dividend income

 

188

 

 

 

188

 

Miscellaneous income

 

413

 

(178

)

 

235

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(1,419

)

4,936

 

 

3,517

 

Income tax benefit

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(3,619

)

(3,619

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,387

)

$

4,936

 

$

(3,619

)

$

(70

)

 

13. Subsequent Events

 

MarkWest Energy Partners Equity Offering

 

On July 6, 2006, the Partnership completed its underwritten public offering of 3.0 million common units (the “Common Unit Offering”) at a price of $39.75 per common unit. In addition, on July 12, 2006, the Partnership completed the sale of an additional 300,000 common units to cover over-allotments in connection with the Common Unit Offering. The sale of units resulted in total gross proceeds of $131.2 million, and net proceeds of $127.3 million, after the underwriters’ commission and legal, accounting and other transaction expenses. The Partnership intends to use the net proceeds from the offering, which includes a capital contribution from its general partner to maintain its 2% general partner interest in the Partnership, to repay a portion of the term debt under the Partnership Credit Facility.

 

24



 

MarkWest Energy Partners Debt Offering

 

On July 6, 2006, the Partnership and its subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Finance Corporation, completed their private placement of $200 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 ½ % senior notes due 2016 (the “2016 Senior Notes”) to qualified institutional buyers. The 2016 Senior Notes will mature on July 15, 2016, and interest is payable on each July 15 and January 15, commencing January 15, 2007. The net proceeds from the private placement were approximately $191.2 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and legal, accounting and other transaction expenses. The Partnership intends to use the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the term debt under the Partnership Credit Facility. Affiliates of several of the initial purchasers, including RBC Capital Markets Corporation, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, are lenders under the Partnership Credit Facility.

 

Change in Address of Principal Executive Offices

 

In July 2006 we relocated our principal executive office to 1515 Arapahoe Street, Suite 700, Denver, Colorado 80202. Our telephone number is 303-925-9200.

 

25



 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 

Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. We use words such as “may,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” “anticipate,” and similar expressions to identify forward looking statements.

 

These forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements include statements relating to, among other things:

 

      Our expectations regarding MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.

      Our ability to grow MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.

      Our ability to amend certain producer contracts.

      Our expectations regarding natural gas, NGLs product and prices.

      Our efforts to increase fee-based contract volumes.

      Our ability to manage our commodity price risk.

      Our ability to maximize the value of our NGL output.

      The adequacy of our general public liability, property, and business interruption insurance.

      Our ability to comply with environmental and governmental regulations.

 

Important factors that could cause our actual results of operations or our actual financial condition to differ include, but are not necessarily limited to:

 

      The availability of raw natural gas supply for our gathering and processing services.

      The availability of NGLs for our transportation, fractionation and storage services.

      Prices of NGL products and natural gas, including the effectiveness of any hedging activities.

      Our ability to negotiate favorable marketing agreements.

      The risks that third party natural gas exploration and production activities will not occur or be successful.

      Our dependence on certain significant customers, producers, gatherers, treaters and transporters of natural gas.

      Competition from other NGL processors, including major energy companies.

      Our dependence on certain significant customers, producers, gatherers, treaters and transporters of natural gas.

      Our substantial debt and other financial obligations could adversely impact our financial condition.

      Our ability to successfully integrate our recent or future acquisitions.

      Our ability to identify and complete organic growth projects or acquisitions complementary to our business.

      Damage to facilities and interruption of service due to casualty, weather, mechanical failure or any extended or extraordinary maintenance or inspection that may be required.

      Changes in general economic conditions in regions in which our products are located.

      The threat of terrorist attacks or war.

      Winter weather conditions.

 

This list is not necessarily complete. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results. The Company does not publicly update any forward-looking statement with new information or future events. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements as many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict.

 

In addition, on April 27, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon announced that its Board of Directors approved the issuance of one share of common stock for each ten shares of common stock held by common stockholders. The stock was issued on May 23, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 11, 2006. 1,084,647 shares were issued at a fair value of $24.4 million, based upon the last sale price on the record date ($22.50 per share). Cash of $3,200 was paid in lieu of fractional shares, based upon the last sale price on the record date. All common stock accounts and per share data, have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the dividend of our common stock.

 

26



 

Overview
 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon reported a net loss of $2.1 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the corresponding quarter of 2005. The company also reported a net income of $0.7 million, or $0.06 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $0.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, for the corresponding period of 2005. The Company reports its results under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), which require that the Company consolidate MarkWest Energy Partners.

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone Results

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone reported an operating loss of $5.7 million, compared to an operating loss of $3.3 million for the comparable quarter of 2005. MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone also reported a net loss of $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $2.0 million for the comparable quarter of 2005.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone reported an operating loss of $6.2 million, compared to an operating loss of $2.3 million for the comparable period of 2005. MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone also reported a net loss of $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $1.4 million for the comparable period of 2005.

 

Stock Dividend

 

On April 27, 2006, MarkWest Hydrocarbon announced that its Board of Directors approved the issuance of one share of common stock for each ten shares of common stock held by common stockholders. The stock was issued on May 23, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 11, 2006; the ex-dividend date was May 9, 2006. 1,084,647 shares were issued at a fair value of $24.4 million, based upon the last sale price on the record date ($22.50 per share). Cash of $3,200 was paid in lieu of fractional shares, based upon the last sale price on the record date.

 

Cash Dividends

 

On January 26, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share, payable on February 22, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 15, 2006. The ex-dividend date was February 13, 2006.

 

On April 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.175 per share, an increase of $0.10 per share from the same period of 2005, payable on June 5, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 26, 2006. The ex-dividend date was May 24, 2006

 

On July 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share, payable on August 21, 2006, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 14, 2006. The ex-dividend date will be August 10, 2006.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners Results

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Partnership reported operating income of $23.3 million compared to $4.7 million for the corresponding quarter of 2005, an increase of $18.6 million, or 396%. The Partnership also reported net income of $14.1 million in the second quarter of 2006, compared to $0.7 million in 2005.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Partnership reported operating income of $45.7 million compared to $13.2 million for the corresponding period of 2005, an increase of $32.5 million, or 246%. The Partnership also reported net income of $28.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $4.9 million in 2005.

 

Our Business

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon was founded in 1988 as a partnership and later incorporated in Delaware.  We completed our initial public offering of common shares in 1996.

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon is an energy company primarily focused on marketing natural gas liquids (NGLs) and increasing shareholder value by growing MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. (“MarkWest Energy Partners” or “The Partnership”), our consolidated subsidiary and a publicly-traded master limited partnership. MarkWest Energy Partners is engaged in the gathering, processing and transmission of natural gas; the transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids; and the gathering and transportation of crude oil.

 

27



 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s assets consist primarily of partnership interests in MarkWest Energy Partners and certain processing agreements in Appalachia.  As of June 30, 2006, the Company owned a 21% interest in the Partnership, consisting of the following:

 

     1,633,334 subordinated units and 836,162 common units, representing a 19% limited partner interest in the Partnership; and

     an 89% ownership interest in MarkWest Energy GP, L.L.C., the general partner of the Partnership, which in turn owns a 2% general partner interest and all of the incentive distribution rights in the Partnership.

 

Following the Partnership’s equity offering of 3.3 million new common units in July 2006 (see Note 13), MarkWest Hydrocarbon and its subsidiaries, in the aggregate, owned a 17% interest in the Partnership, consisting of 1,633,334 subordinated units, 836,162 common units and a 2% general partner interest in the Partnership.

 

To better understand our business and the results of operations discussed below, it is important to have an understanding of three factors:

 

      The nature of the business from which we derive our revenues and from which MarkWest Energy Partners derives its revenues;

      The nature of our relationship with MarkWest Energy Partners; and

      The lack of comparability within our results of operations across periods because of MarkWest Energy Partners’ significant acquisition activity.

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

Excluding the equity income derived from MarkWest Energy Partners, we generate the majority of our revenues and net operating margin (defined and discussed further, below) from our Appalachia processing agreements. We outsource these services to the Partnership, and pay the Partnership a fee for providing processing and fractionation services. As compensation for providing processing services to our Appalachian producers, we earn a fee and receive title to the NGLs produced. In return, we are required to replace, in dry natural gas, the Btu value of the NGLs extracted.  This Btu replacement obligation is referred to in the industry as a “keep-whole” arrangement. In keep-whole arrangements, our principal cost is purchasing and delivering dry gas of an equivalent Btu content to replace Btus extracted from the gas stream in the form of NGLs, or consumed as fuel during processing.  The spread between the NGL product sales price and the purchase price of natural gas with an equivalent Btu content is called the “frac spread.” Generally, the frac spread is positive and offsets all or a portion of the fees that we pay the Partnership.  In the event natural gas becomes more expensive, on a Btu equivalent basis, than NGL products, and the associated fees that we pay the Partnership, the net operating margin associated with the Appalachian processing agreements results in operating losses.

 

In Appalachia, we have entered into operating agreements with a customer with respect to natural gas delivered into its transmission facilities, upstream of MarkWest Energy Partners’ Kenova, Boldman and Cobb facilities. Under the terms of these operating agreements, the customer has agreed to use reasonable, diligent efforts to supply these facilities with consistent volumes of natural gas shipped by the customer, on behalf of the Appalachian producers. The initial terms of our agreements with this customer run through December 31, 2015, with annual renewals thereafter.

 

In September 2004, we entered into several new and amended agreements, expiring December 31, 2009, with one of the largest Appalachia producers, which allow us to significantly reduce our exposure to commodity price risk, for approximately 25% of our keep-whole gas volumes.  Under these agreements, the Company’s exposure to the keep-whole natural gas is limited in the event natural gas becomes more expensive than the NGL product sales price, thereby mitigating the risk of incurring operating losses.

 

Beginning in 2006 we also entered into derivative instruments, which are marked to market, to manage our risks related to commodity price exposure. Our keep-whole contracts expose us to commodity price risk, both on the sales side (of NGLs) and on the purchase side (of natural gas), which, in turn, may increase the volatility of our standalone results and cash flows.  We attempt to mitigate our commodity price risk through our commodity price risk management program (see Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for further details about our commodity price risk management program).

 

Our natural gas marketing group markets natural gas for MarkWest Energy Partners’ facilities, purchases replacement Btu gas requirements and assists with business development efforts. Since February 2004, the Company has been engaged in the wholesale propane marketing business through a third party agency agreement. In June of 2006, that agreement was terminated. MarkWest Hydrocarbon also enters into future sale agreements that, as derivative instruments, are marked to market.

 

28



 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon also receives revenue under fee-based arrangements for processing natural gas.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

The Partnership generates the majority of its revenues and net operating margin (defined and discussed further, below) from natural gas gathering, processing and transmission, NGL transportation, fractionation and storage; and crude oil gathering and transportation. In many cases, the Partnership provides services under contracts that contain a combination of more than one of the arrangements described below. While all of these services constitute midstream energy operations, the Partnership provides services under the following different types of arrangements:

 

      Fee-based arrangements. Under fee-based arrangements, the Partnership receives a fee or fees for one or more of the following services: gathering, processing and transmission of natural gas; transportation, fractionation and storage of NGLs; and gathering and transportation of crude oil. The revenue the Partnership earns from these arrangements is directly related to the volume of natural gas, NGLs or crude oil that flows through our systems and facilities and is not directly dependent on commodity prices. In certain cases, these arrangements provide for minimum annual payments. If a sustained decline in commodity prices were to result in a decline in volumes, however, the Partnership’s revenues from these arrangements would be reduced.

 

      Percent-of-proceeds arrangements.  Under percent-of-proceeds arrangements, the Partnership gathers and processes natural gas on behalf of producers, sells the resulting residue gas, condensate and NGLs at market prices, and remits to producers an agreed upon percentage of the proceeds based on an index price. In other cases, instead of remitting cash payments to the producer, the Partnership delivers an agreed-upon percentage of the residue gas and NGLs to the producer, and sells the volumes it keeps to third parties at market prices.  Generally, under these types of arrangements its revenues and net operating margins generally increase as natural gas, condensate and NGL prices increase, and its revenues and net operating margins decrease as natural gas and NGL prices decrease

 

      Percent-of-index arrangements.  Under percent-of-index arrangements, the Partnership generally purchases natural gas at either (1) a percentage discount to a specified index price, (2) a specified index price less a fixed amount, or (3) a percentage discount to a specified index price less an additional fixed amount. It then gathers and delivers the natural gas to pipelines, where it resells the natural gas at the index price, or at a different percentage discount to the index price. The net operating margins the Partnership realizes under these arrangements decrease in periods of low natural gas prices, because these net operating margins are based on a percentage of the index price. Conversely, their net operating margins increase during periods of high natural gas prices.

 

      Keep-whole arrangements.  Under keep-whole arrangements, the Partnership gathers natural gas from the producer, processes the natural gas, and sells the resulting condensate and NGLs to third parties at market prices. Because the extraction of the condensate and NGLs from the natural gas during processing reduces the Btu content of the natural gas, the Partnership must either purchase natural gas at market prices for return to producers, or make cash payment to the producers equal to the energy content of this natural gas. Accordingly, under these arrangements the Partnership’s revenues and net operating margins increase as the price of condensate and NGLs increases relative to the price of natural gas, and decreases as the price of natural gas increases relative to the price of condensate and NGLs.

 

      Settlement margin.  Typically, the Partnership is allowed to retain a fixed percentage of the volume gathered to cover the compression fuel charges and deemed line losses.  To the extent the gathering system is operated more efficiently than specified per contract allowance, the Partnership is entitled to retain the difference for its own account.

 

In many cases, it provides services under contracts that contain a combination of more than one of the arrangements described above. The terms of the Partnership’s contracts vary based on gas quality conditions, the competitive environment at the time the contracts are signed and customer requirements. The Partnership’s contract mix and, accordingly, its exposure to natural gas and NGL prices, may change as a result of changes in producer preferences, its expansion in regions where some types of contracts are more common and other market factors. Any change in mix will influence the Partnership’s financial results.

 

At June 30, 2006, the Partnership’s primary exposure to keep-whole contracts was limited to its Arapaho (Oklahoma) processing plant and its East Texas processing contracts. At the Arapaho plant inlet, the Btu content of the natural gas meets the downstream pipeline specification; however, the Partnership has the option of extracting NGLs when the processing margin environment is favorable. In addition, approximately half, as measured in volumes, of the related gas gathering contracts include additional fees to cover plant operating costs, fuel costs and shrinkage costs in a low-processing margin environment. Because of the Partnership’s ability to operate the plant in several recovery modes, including turning it

 

29



 

off, coupled with the additional fees provided for in the gas gathering contracts, its overall keep-whole contract exposure is limited to a small portion of the operating costs of the plant. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, approximately 7.6% and 7.6% of East Texas inlet volumes were processed pursuant to keep-whole contracts.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, MarkWest Energy Partners generated the following percentages of its revenues and net operating margin from the following types of contracts:

 

 

 

Fee-Based

 

Percent-of-
 Proceeds (1)

 

Percent-of-
Index (2)

 

Keep-
Whole (3)

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

13

%

36

%

17

%

34

%

100

%

Net operating margin

 

31

%

51

%

10

%

8

%

100

%

 


(1)   Includes other types of arrangements tied to NGL prices.

(2)   Includes settlement margin, condensate sales and other types of arrangements tied to natural gas prices.

(3)   Includes settlement margin, condensate sales and other types of arrangements tied to both NGL and natural gas prices.

 

Our Relationship with MarkWest Energy Partners

 

We spun off the majority of our then-existing natural gas gathering and processing and NGL transportation, fractionation and storage assets into MarkWest Energy Partners in May 2002, just before the Partnership completed its initial public offering. At the time of its formation and initial public offering, we entered into four contracts with MarkWest Energy Partners whereby MarkWest Energy Partners provides midstream services in Appalachia to us for a fee.  Additionally, MarkWest Energy Partners receives 100% of all fee and percent-of-proceeds consideration for the first 10 MMcf/d that it gathers and processes in Michigan. MarkWest Hydrocarbon retains a 70% net profits interest in the gathering and processing income earned on quarterly pipeline throughput in excess of 10 MMcf/d.  In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), MarkWest Energy Partners’ financial results are included in our consolidated financial statements.  All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated during consolidation.

 

As a result of the contracts mentioned above, the Company is one of the Partnership’s largest customers.  For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we accounted for 12% of the Partnership’s revenues and 13% of its net operating margin.  This represents a decrease from the six months ended June 30, 2005, when we accounted for 16% of the Partnership’s revenues and 22% of its net operating margin.  We expect we will continue to account for less of the Partnership’s business in the future as it continues to acquire assets and increase its customer base or diversify its business.

 

We control and operate MarkWest Energy Partners through our majority ownership in the Partnership’s general partner.  Our employees are responsible for conducting the Partnership’s business and operating its assets pursuant to a Services Agreement, which was formalized and made effective January 1, 2004.

 

Impact of Recent Acquisitions on Comparability of Financial Results

 

Recent MarkWest Energy Partners Acquisition Activity

 

In reading the discussion of our historical results of operations, you should be aware of the impact of our recent acquisitions, which fundamentally affect the comparability of our results of operations over the periods discussed.

 

Since the Partnership’s initial public offering, it has completed eight acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $795 million, net of working capital. The following table sets forth information regarding each of these acquisitions:

 

Name

 

Assets

 

Location

 

Consideration

 

Closing Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

Javelina (1)

 

Gas processing and fractionation facility

 

Corpus Christi, TX

 

$

398.8

 

November 1, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Starfish (2)

 

Natural gas pipeline, gathering system and dehydration facility

 

Gulf of Mexico/Southern Louisiana

 

$

41.7

 

March 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

East Texas

 

Gathering system and gas procession assets

 

East Texas

 

$

240.7

 

July 30, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hobbs

 

Natural gas pipeline

 

New Mexico

 

$

2.3

 

April 1, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan Crude Pipeline

 

Common carrier crude oil pipeline

 

Michigan

 

$

21.3

 

December 18, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Western Oklahoma

 

Gathering system

 

Western Oklahoma

 

$

38.0

 

December 1, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lubbock Pipeline

 

Natural gas pipeline

 

West Texas

 

$

12.2

 

September 2, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pinnacle

 

Natural gas pipelines and gathering systems

 

East Texas

 

$

39.9

 

March 28, 2003

 


(1)   Consideration includes $35.5 million in cash.

(2)   Represents a 50% non-controlling interest.

 

30



 

Results of Operations
 

Operating Data

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

% Change

 

2006

 

2005

 

% Change

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NGL product sales (gallons)(1)

 

19,783,000

 

31,317,000

 

-36.8

%

69,750,000

 

83,481,000

 

-16.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NGL product sales (gallons)(2)

 

7,867,000

 

7,087,000

 

11.0

%

35,063,000

 

26,759,000

 

31.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MarkWest Energy Partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

East Texas(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gathering systems throughput (Mcf/d)

 

375,000

 

323,000

 

16.1

%

360,000

 

305,000

 

18.0

%

NGL product sales (gallons)

 

40,461,000

 

26,222,000

 

54.3

%

75,897,000

 

50,596,000

 

50.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oklahoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foss Lake gathering systems throughput (Mcf/d)

 

84,500

 

70,000

 

20.7

%

86,100

 

69,000

 

24.8

%

Arapaho NGL product sales (gallons)

 

19,615,000

 

16,457,000

 

19.2

%

38,032,000

 

31,674,000

 

20.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Southwest(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appleby gathering systems throughput (Mcf/d)

 

33,600

 

32,000

 

5.0

%

33,600

 

30,000

 

12.0

%

Other gathering systems throughput (Mcf/d)

 

21,900

 

16,000

 

36.9

%

20,500

 

17,000

 

20.6

%

Lateral throughput volumes (Mcf/d)

 

93,600

 

91,000

 

2.9

%

71,500

 

72,000

 

(0.7

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appalachia(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas processed for a fee (Mcf/d)

 

197,000

 

192,000

 

2.6

%

201,000

 

200,000

 

0.5

%

NGLs fractionated for a fee (Gal/day)

 

450,000

 

421,000

 

6.9

%

450,000

 

441,000

 

2.0

%

NGL product sales (gallons)

 

10,468,000

 

10,154,000

 

3.1

%

20,951,000

 

20,919,000

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas processed for a fee (Mcf/d)

 

5,800

 

6,800

 

(14.7

)%

5,200

 

6,900

 

(24.6

)%

NGL product sales (gallons)

 

1,394,000

 

1,493,000

 

(6.6

)%

2,843,000

 

3,056,000

 

(7.0

)%

Crude oil transported for a fee (Bbl/d)

 

14,900

 

14,200

 

4.9

%

14,600

 

14,200

 

2.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gulf Coast(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas processed for a fee (Mcf/d)

 

130,000

 

NA

 

NA

 

125,000

 

NA

 

NA

 

NGLs fractionated for a fee (Gal/day)

 

1,1128,000

 

NA

 

NA

 

1,086,000

 

NA

 

NA

 

 


(1)   Represents sales at the Siloam fractionator.

(2)   Represents sales from our wholesale business.

(3)   MarkWest Energy Partners acquired the East Texas System in late July 2004.

(4)   MarkWest Energy Partners acquired the Lubbock pipeline (a/k/a the Power-tex Lateral Pipeline) in September 2003 and the Hobbs lateral pipeline in April 2004. The Lubbock and Hobbs pipelines are the only laterals the Partnership own that produce revenue on a per-unit-of-throughput basis. MarkWest Energy Partners receive a flat fee from our other lateral pipelines and, consequently, the throughput data from these lateral pipelines is excluded from this statistic.

(5)   Includes throughput from the Kenova, Cobb, and Boldman processing plants.

(6)   MarkWest Energy Partners acquired the Javelina system (Gulf Coast) on November 1, 2005.

 

31



 

Financial Results

 

Management evaluates performance on the basis of net operating margin (a “non-GAAP” financial measure), which is defined as income (loss) from operations, excluding facility cost, selling, general and administrative expense, depreciation, amortization, impairments and accretion of asset retirement. These charges have been excluded for the purpose of enhancing the understanding by both management and investors of the underlying baseline operating performance of our contractual arrangements, which management uses to evaluate our financial performance for purposes of planning and forecasting. Net operating margin does not have any standardized definition and therefore is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other reporting companies. Net operating margin results should not be evaluated in isolation of, or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with United States GAAP. Our usage of net operating margin and the underlying methodology in excluding certain charges is not necessarily an indication of the results of operations expected in the future, or that we will not, in fact, incur such charges in future periods.

 

The following reconciles this non-GAAP financial measure to the most comparable GAAP financial measure for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Three months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

62,189

 

$

142,280

 

$

(17,879

)

$

186,590

 

Derivatives

 

(6,156

)

(6,901

)

 

(13,057

)

Total revenue

 

56,033

 

135,379

 

(17,879

)

173,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

52,606

 

76,178

 

(11,926

)

116,858

 

Net operating margin

 

3,427

 

59,201

 

(5,953

)

56,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility expenses

 

4,705

 

15,465

 

(5,953

)

14,217

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

4,073

 

8,988

 

 

13,061

 

Depreciation

 

394

 

7,384

 

 

7,778

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,027

 

 

4,027

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

 

26

 

 

26

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(5,745

)

23,311

 

 

17,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

1,228

 

 

1,228

 

Interest income

 

177

 

259

 

 

436

 

Interest expense

 

(84

)

(10,714

)

 

(10,798

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(33

)

(826

)

 

(859

)

Dividend income

 

109

 

 

 

109

 

Miscellaneous income

 

2

 

1,515

 

 

1,517

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(5,574

)

14,773

 

 

9,199

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

78

 

(679

)

543

 

(58

)

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(11,273

)

(11,273

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(5,496

)

$

14,094

 

$

(10,730

)

$

(2,132

)

 

32



 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Three months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

52,786

 

$

103,200

 

$

(14,706

)

$

141,280

 

Derivatives

 

 

(240

)

 

(240

)

Total revenue

 

52,786

 

102,960

 

(14,706

)

141,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

47,729

 

73,862

 

(9,237

)

112,354

 

Net operating margin

 

5,057

 

29,098

 

(5,469

)

28,686

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility expenses

 

5,094

 

11,360

 

(5,469

)

10,985

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

2,814

 

6,311

 

 

9,125

 

Depreciation

 

419

 

4,576

 

 

4,995

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

2,095

 

 

2,095

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

2

 

9

 

 

11

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(3,272

)

4,747

 

 

1,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

(1

)

990

 

 

989

 

Interest income

 

258

 

63

 

 

321

 

Interest expense

 

(30

)

(4,558

)

 

(4,588

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(61

)

(497

)

 

(558

)

Dividend income

 

96

 

 

 

96

 

Miscellaneous income

 

222

 

(74

)

 

148

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(2,788

)

671

 

 

(2,117

)

Income tax benefit

 

802

 

 

 

802

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(294

)

(294

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,986

)

$

671

 

$

(294

)

$

(1,609

)

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone

 

Revenues. Revenues increased $3.2 million, or 6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. This was due in part to a $2.4 million increase in our wholesale NGL revenues; driven by a $0.22 per gallon price increase and a volume increase of nearly 9,000 Gal/d. Our frac spread NGL revenues increased by $5.8 million due primarily to an increase in prices of $0.29 per gallon, partially offset by reduced volumes of 24,000 Gal/d. The revaluation of our long-term shrink obligation increased revenue by $1.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a $0.4 million increase in 2005, resulting in a $1.2 million positive impact to the period-over-period comparison.

 

Derivatives:  Loss from derivatives, a component of revenue, increased $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. This was due to increased use of derivative instruments for which, consistent with previous announcements, we have not elected to adopt hedge accounting treatment.

 

Purchased Product Costs. Purchased product costs increased $4.9 million, or 10%, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. The increase was due to a $2.2 million increase in our wholesale business that was driven by volumes increasing in 2006 by nearly 9,000 Gal/d and increased prices of $0.21 per gallon. Our frac spread purchase costs increased by $2.1 million due to price increases of $0.07 per gallon, offset by slightly lower volumes.

 

Facility Expenses. Facility expenses decreased by approximately $0.4 million, or 8%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to corresponding quarter of 2005. Facility expense decreased primarily to increased fuel reimbursements.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million, or 45%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. This increase was primarily due to a $0.3 million increase to the participation plan compensation expense and higher labor and benefit costs due to increased head count costs needed to manage the new acquisitions of the Partnership.

 

33



 

Depreciation. Depreciation expense decreased by less than $0.1 million, or 6%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005, due to certain fixed assets becoming fully depreciated in 2005.

 

Income taxes. Income tax expense decreased by $0.7 million, or 90%, due to the increase in losses in the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. The change in the annual effective tax rate reflects the new Texas margin tax, which is offset by the utilization of various state net operating losses (“NOL”) and the corresponding change in the state NOL valuation allowance.  The Company believes, however, that it is more likely than not that the state NOLs will not be fully realized and continues to maintain a valuation allowance against this long-term deferred tax asset.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006, increased by $32.2 million, or 31%, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005, due to the Partnership’s Javelina acquisition in November 2005, which contributed $18.9 million, as well as increased volumes and prices resulting in revenue increases in East Texas of $12.5 million.

 

Derivatives:  Loss from derivatives, a component of revenue not allocated to segments, increased $6.7 million, or 2,775%, due to increased use of derivative instruments for which, consistent with previous announcements, we have not elected to adopt hedge accounting treatment. $6.4 million of the 2006 loss was from mark-to-market, which is a non-cash charge that does not impact distributable cash flow.

 

Purchased Product Costs. Purchased product costs increased during the three months ended June 30, 2006, by $2.3 million, or 3%, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. This increase was primarily due to $3.6 million in costs related to the new Carthage facility in East Texas and $1.7 million in expense in Appalachia driven by an increase in both volumes and prices. This increase was partially offset by decreases in facility expenses in Oklahoma and Other Southwest of $1.8 and $1.2 million, respectively.

 

Facility Expenses. Facility expenses increased approximately $4.1 million, or 36%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005, primarily due to the Partnership’s November 2005 Javelina Acquisition, which contributed $3.2 million, and $1.5 million related to the new Carthage facility in East Texas, which started operations on January 1, 2006.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.7 million, or 42%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, relative to the comparable period in 2005. The increase is due to a one-time charge to terminate the old headquarters lease, $0.9 million; higher non-cash, equity-based compensation expense, $0.6 million, primarily due to the Partnership’s increased market value; labor costs related to additional personnel to support our growth and strategic objectives, $1.5 million; and higher insurance premiums, $0.7 million. These increases were offset by a decrease in professional fees, $0.9 million, due primarily to the majority of our audit work being completed in the first quarter of 2006, compared to extended timing in 2005.

 

Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Affiliates. Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates during the three months ended June 30, 2006, relative to the comparable period in 2005, increased $0.2 million, or 24%, due to Starfish adding a lateral pipeline during the quarter, but offset by Hurricane Rita repairs.

 

Interest Expense and Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs (a component of interest expense).  Interest expense increased by $6.5 million, or 128%, during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 2005, primarily as a result of the additional debt related to the Starfish and Javelina acquisitions.

 

Texas margin Tax.  Texas passed a Texas margin tax law that causes the Partnership to be subject to an entity-level tax on the portion of our income that is generated in Texas.  We recorded a deferred tax liability of $0.7 million, related to the Partnership’s temporary differences that are expected to reverse in future periods. $0.5 million was allocated to minority interest.

 

The following includes reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure of this non-GAAP financial measure for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

 

34



 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

164,281

 

$

298,783

 

$

(35,594

)

$

427,470

 

Derivatives

 

(7,655

)

(6,661

)

 

(14,316

)

Total revenue

 

156,626

 

292,122

 

(35,594

)

413,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

144,631

 

176,975

 

(23,581

)

298,025

 

Net operating margin

 

11,995

 

115,147

 

(12,013

)

115,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility expenses

 

10,475

 

29,459

 

(12,013

)

27,921

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

7,111

 

17,326

 

 

24,437

 

Depreciation

 

599

 

14,557

 

 

15,156

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

8,043

 

 

8,043

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

 

51

 

 

51

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(6,190

)

45,711

 

 

39,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

2,173

 

 

2,173

 

Interest income

 

363

 

479

 

 

842

 

Interest expense

 

(152

)

(21,690

)

 

(21,842

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(50

)

(1,634

)

 

(1,684

)

Dividend income

 

215

 

 

 

215

 

Miscellaneous income

 

152

 

3,607

 

 

3,759

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(5,662

)

28,646

 

 

22,984

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(331

)

(679

)

543

 

(467

)

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(21,817

)

(21,817

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(5,993

)

$

27,967

 

$

(21,274

)

$

700

 

 

 

 

MarkWest
Hydrocarbon
Standalone

 

MarkWest
Energy
Partners

 

Consolidating
Entries

 

Total

 

Six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

117,307

 

$

192,744

 

$

(30,511

)

$

279,540

 

Derivatives

 

 

(147

)

 

(147

)

Total revenue

 

117,307

 

192,597

 

(30,511

)

279,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased product costs

 

101,550

 

134,647

 

(19,144

)

217,053

 

Net operating margin

 

15,757

 

57,950

 

(11,367

)

62,340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility expenses

 

10,921

 

20,691

 

(11,367

)

20,245

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

6,277

 

10,950

 

 

17,227

 

Depreciation

 

834

 

8,902

 

 

9,736

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,190

 

 

4,190

 

Accretion of asset retirement and lease obligations

 

2

 

19

 

 

21

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(2,277

)

13,198

 

 

10,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

990

 

 

990

 

Interest income

 

440

 

130

 

 

570

 

Interest expense

 

(61

)

(8,232

)

 

(8,293

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs (a component of interest expense)

 

(122

)

(972

)

 

(1,094

)

Dividend income

 

188

 

 

 

188

 

Miscellaneous income

 

413

 

(178

)

 

235

 

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary and income taxes

 

(1,419

)

4,936

 

 

3,517

 

Income tax benefit

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

Non-controlling interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

 

(3,619

)

(3,619

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,387

)

$

4,936

 

$

(3,619

)

$

(70

)

 

35



 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone

 

Revenues. Revenues increased $39.3 million, or 34%, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. This was due in part to a $13.1 million increase in our wholesale NGL revenues, driven by a $0.17 per gallon price increase and a volume increase of nearly 46,000 Gal/d. Our frac spread NGL revenues improved by $12.2 million, due primarily to an increase in prices of $0.23 per gallon, partially offset by reduced volumes of 20,000 Gal/d. We also realized a $15.0 million increase in our gas marketing business due primarily to increases in both prices and volumes. The revaluation of our long-term shrink obligation increased revenue by $5.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a $0.8 million decrease in 2005, resulting in a $6.5 million positive impact to the period-over-period comparison.

 

Derivatives:  Loss from derivatives, a component of revenue, increased $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. This was due to increased use of derivative instruments for which, consistent with previous announcements, we have not elected to adopt hedge accounting treatment.

 

Purchased Product Costs. Purchased product costs increased $43.1 million, or 42%, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. The increase was due to a $13.0 million increase in our wholesale business, driven by volumes increasing by nearly 46,000 Gal/d and increased prices of $0.10 per gallon. Our frac spread purchase costs increased by $16.0 million due to price increases of $0.27 per gallon, partially offset by reduced volumes of 20,000 Gal/d. Our natural gas marketing business had an increase of $14.1 million, due primarily to increases in both prices and volumes.

 

Facility Expenses. Facility expenses decreased by approximately $0.4 million, or 4%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to corresponding quarter of 2005. The primary reason for the decrease was due to inventory gains. These were partially offset by increased Siloam storage fees, higher Kenova, Boldman and Cobb plant processing fees, and increased ALPS transportation fees of $0.4 million.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.8 million, or 13%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005. This increase was due primarily to a $0.4 million increase to the participation plan compensation expense.

 

Depreciation. Depreciation expense decreased by $0.2 million, or 28%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005 due to certain fixed assets becoming fully depreciated in 2005.

 

Income taxes. Income tax expense increased by $0.4 million, or 1134%, due to the increase in losses in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. The change in the annual effective tax rate reflects the new Texas margin Tax, which is offset by the utilization of various state net operating losses (“NOL”) and the corresponding change in the state NOL valuation allowance.  The Company believes, however, that it is more likely than not that the state NOLs will not be fully realized and continues to maintain a valuation allowance against this long-term deferred tax asset.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

Revenues. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006, increased by $99.5 million, or 52%, compared to the corresponding period of 2005, due to the Partnership’s Javelina acquisition in November 2005, which contributed $33.9 million, as well as increased volumes and prices resulting in revenue increase in Oklahoma of $29.5 million, in East Texas of $30.2 million and in Appalachia of $5.1 million.

 

Derivatives:  Loss from derivatives for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $6.5 million due to increased use of derivative instruments for which, consistent with previous announcements, we have not elected to adopt hedge accounting treatment.

 

36



 

Purchased Product Costs. Purchased product costs increased during the six months ended June 30, 2006, by $42.3 million, or 31%, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005. This increase was primarily due to $13.2 million in costs related to the new Carthage facility in East Texas and increased expenses in Oklahoma and Other Southwest of $21.0 and $5.5 million, respectively.

 

Facility Expenses. Facility expenses increased approximately $8.8 million, or 42%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2005, primarily due to the Partnership’s November 2005 Javelina acquisition, which contributed $5.1 million; and $2.9 million related to the new Carthage facility in East Texas, which started operations on January 1, 2006.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6.4 million, or 58%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, relative to the comparable period in 2005. The increase is primarily due to a one-time charge to terminate the old headquarters lease, $0.9 million; higher non-cash, equity-based compensation expense, $0.9 million, primarily due to the Partnership’s increased market value; labor costs related to additional personnel to support our growth and strategic objectives, $1.2 million; higher insurance premiums, $2.2 million; and professional services, $0.4 million.

 

Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Affiliates. Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates during the six months ended June 30, 2006, increased $1.2 million, or 119%, relative to the comparable period in 2005. The increase was primarily because our 2006 results included Starfish for six months, compared to just three months in 2005, $0.9 million.

 

Interest Expense and Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs (a component of interest expense).  Interest expense increased by $14.1 million, or 153%, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 2005, primarily as a result of the additional debt related to the Starfish and Javelina acquisitions.

 

Texas margin Tax.  Texas passed a Texas margin tax law that causes the Partnership to be subject to an entity-level tax on the portion of our income that is generated in Texas.  We recorded a deferred tax liability of $0.7 million, related to the Partnership’s temporary differences that are expected to reverse in future periods. $0.5 million was allocated to minority interest.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon Standalone

 

Our primary source of liquidity, to meet operating expenses and fund capital expenditures, is cash flow from operations, principally from the marketing of NGLs, and quarterly distributions received from MarkWest Energy Partners.  Based on current volume, price and expense assumptions, we expect cash flow from operations and distributions from the Partnership to fund our operations and capital expenditures in 2006.  Most of our future capital expenditures are discretionary.

 

We own 89% of the general partner of MarkWest Energy Partners, excluding interests held by certain employees and directors, but deemed owned by the Company through the Participation Plan.  The general partner of MarkWest Energy Partners owns the 2% general partner interest and all of the incentive distribution rights.  The incentive distribution rights entitle us to receive an increasing percentage of cash distributed by the Partnership as certain target distribution levels are reached.  Specifically, they entitle us to receive 13% of all cash distributed in a quarter after each unit has received $0.55 for that quarter; 23% of all cash distributed after each unit has received $0.625 for that quarter; and 48% of all cash distributed after each unit has received $0.75 for that quarter.  For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we received $4.2 million in distributions from our limited units, and $3.7 million from our general partner interest, of which $3.6 million represented payments on incentive distribution rights.

 

Cash flows generated from our NGL marketing and natural gas supply operations are subject to volatility in energy prices, especially prices for NGLs and natural gas.  Our cash flows are enhanced in periods when the prices received for NGLs are high relative to the price of natural gas we purchase to satisfy our “keep-whole” contractual arrangements in Appalachia.  Conversely, they are reduced in periods when the prices received for NGLs are low relative to the price of natural gas we purchase to satisfy such contractual arrangements.  Under “keep-whole” contracts, we retain and sell the NGLs produced in our processing operations for third-party producers, and then reimburse or “keep-whole” the producers for the energy content of the NGLs removed through the re-delivery to the producers of an equivalent amount (on a Btu basis) of dry natural gas.  Generally, the value of the NGLs extracted is greater than the cost of replacing those Btus with dry gas, resulting in positive operating margins under these contracts.  Periodically, natural gas becomes more expensive, on a Btu equivalent basis, than NGL products, and the cost of keeping the producer “whole” can result in operating losses.

 

37



 

Debt

 

In October 2004, the Company entered into a $25.0 million senior credit facility with a term of one year.  The $25.0 million revolving facility has a variable interest rate based on the base rate or the London Inter Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”), as discussed below.  In October, November, and December 2005, the Company entered into the first, second and third amendment to the credit agreement.  The first amendment extended the term of the original agreement to November 15, 2005.  The second amendment reduced the lending amount from $25.0 million to $16.0 million, of which $6.0 million of availability is committed to a letter of credit, leaving $10.0 million available for revolving loans.  The second amendment also extended the term of the revolving credit to December 30, 2005.  The third amendment extended the term of the revolving credit to January 31, 2006, and reduced the lending amount from $16.0 million to $13.5 million, of which $6.0 million of availability is committed to a letter of credit, leaving $7.5 million available for revolving loans. On January 31, 2006, the Company entered into the first amended and restated credit agreement which reinstated the maximum lending limit of $25.0 million for a one year term.

 

The credit facility bears interest at a variable interest rate, plus basis points. The variable interest rate is typically based on LIBOR; however, in certain borrowing circumstances the rate would be based on the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5-1%, and b) a rate set by the Facility’s administrative agent, based on the U.S. prime rate. The basis points correspond to the ratio of the Revolver Facility Usage (as defined in the Company Credit Facility) to the Borrowing Base (as defined in the Company Credit Facility), ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% for Base Rate loans, and 1.75% to 2.75% for Eurodollar Rate loans. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the credit facility at an annual rate of 50.0 basis points.

 

Under the provisions of the credit facility, the Company is subject to a number of restrictions on its business, including restrictions on its ability to grant liens on assets; make or own certain investments; enter into any swap contracts other than in the ordinary course of business; merge, consolidate or sell assets; incur indebtedness (other than subordinated indebtedness); make distributions on equity investments; declare or make, directly or indirectly, any restricted distributions.

 

At June 30, 2006, we had no debt outstanding on the Company Credit Facility and $19.0 million available for borrowing.

 

We spent $0.3 million for capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2005.  We have budgeted $0.8 million for 2006 consisting principally of computer hardware and software.  We believe that cash on hand, cash received from quarterly distributions (including the incentive distribution rights) from MarkWest Energy Partners, and projected cash generated from our marketing operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements and fund our required capital expenditures, if any, for the foreseeable future.  Cash generated from our marketing operations will depend on our operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing commodity prices and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

The Partnership’s primary source of liquidity, to meet operating expenses and fund capital expenditures (other than for certain acquisitions), are cash flows generated by its operations and its access to equity and debt markets. The equity and debt markets, public and private, retail and institutional, have been the Partnership’s principal source of capital used to finance a significant amount of its growth, including acquisitions.

 

On December 29, 2005, MarkWest Energy Operating Company, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of MarkWest Energy Partners L.P., entered into the fifth amended and restated credit agreement (“Partnership Credit Facility”). It provides for a maximum lending limit of $615.0 million for a five-year term. The credit facility includes a revolving facility of $250.0 million and a $365.0 million term loan, which can be repaid at any time without penalty. Under certain circumstances, the Partnership Credit Facility can be increased from $250 million up to $450 million. The credit facility is guaranteed by the Partnership and all of the Partnership’s subsidiaries and is collateralized by substantially all of the Partnership’s assets and those of its subsidiaries. The borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a variable interest rate, plus basis points. The variable interest rate typically is based on the London Inter Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”); however, in certain borrowing circumstances the rate would be based on the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5-1%, and b) a rate set by the Facility’s administrative agent, based on the U.S. prime rate. The basis points correspond to the ratio of the Partnership’s Consolidated Senior Debt (as defined in the Partnership Credit Facility) to Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership Credit Facility), ranging from 0.50% to 1.50% for Base Rate loans, and 1.50% to 2.50% for Eurodollar Rate loans. The basis points will increase by 0.50% during any period (not to exceed 270 days) where the Partnership makes an acquisition for a purchase price in excess of $50.0 million (“Acquisition Adjustment Period”). Borrowings under the Partnership Credit Facility were used to finance, in part, the Javelina acquisition discussed above. On June 30, 2006, the available borrowing capacity under the Partnership Credit Facility was $243.7 million.

 

38



 

Cash generated from operations, borrowings under the Partnership Credit Facility and funds from the Partnership’s private and public equity offerings are its primary sources of liquidity. The timing of the Partnerships efforts to raise equity in the future, however, will be influenced by its failure to file in a timely manner its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005. In order to raise capital through a public offering with the SEC, they will not have the ability to incorporate by reference information from its future filings into a new registration statement until October 11, 2006. To raise additional capital through public debt or equity offerings, the Partnership is required to file a Form S-1, which is a long-form type of registration statement.

 

At June 30, 2006, the Partnership and its subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Finance Corporation, also have $225.0 million in senior notes outstanding, at a fixed rate of 6.875%. The notes mature on November 2, 2014. Subject to compliance with certain covenants, the Partnership may issue additional notes from time to time under the indenture pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

The indenture governing the 2014 senior notes limits the activity of the Partnership and its restricted subsidiaries. The provisions of such indenture place limits on the ability of the Partnership and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; declare or pay dividends or distributions or redeem, repurchase or retire equity interests or subordinated indebtedness; make investments; incur liens; create any consensual limitation on the ability of the Partnership’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or transfer property to the Partnership; engage in transactions with the Partnership’s affiliates; sell assets, including equity interests of the Partnership’s subsidiaries; make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem, defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value any subordinated obligation or guarantor subordination obligation (except principal and interest at maturity); and consolidate, merge or transfer assets.

 

On July 6, 2006, the Partnership completed its underwritten public offering of 3.0 million common units (the “Common Unit Offering”) at a public offering price of $39.75 per common unit. In addition, on July 12, 2006, the Partnership completed the sale of an additional 300,000 common units to cover over-allotments in connection with the Common Unit Offering. The sale of units resulted in total gross proceeds of $131.2 million, and net proceeds of $127.3 million, after the underwriters’ commission and legal, accounting and other transaction expenses. The Partnership intends to use the net proceeds from the offering, which includes a capital contribution from its general partner to maintain its 2% general partner interest in the Partnership, to repay a portion of the term debt under the Partnership Credit Facility.

 

On July 6, 2006, the “Partnership and its subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Finance Corporation issued $200,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 8 ½ % senior notes due 2016 (the “2016 Senior Notes”).

 

The 2016 Senior Notes will mature on July 15, 2016, and interest is payable each July 15 and January 15, commencing January 15, 2007. The Partnership closed this private placement on July 6, 2006. The net proceeds from the private placement were approximately $191.2 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and legal, accounting and other transaction expenses. The Partnership intends to use the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the term debt under the Partnership Credit Facility. Affiliates of several of the initial purchasers, including RBC Capital Markets Corporation, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, are lenders under the Partnership Credit Facility.

 

The indenture governing the 2016 Senior Notes restricts the Partnership’s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to borrow money, pay distributions or dividends on equity or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire equity, make investments, use assets as collateral in other transactions, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies, enter into transactions with affiliates, and engage in unrelated businesses. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. If at any time when the 2016 Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and no Default (as defined in the Indenture) has occurred and is continuing, many of the covenants will terminate and the Partnership and its subsidiaries will cease be subject to them.

 

The Partnership’s ability to pay distributions to its unitholders and to fund planned capital expenditures and make acquisitions will depend upon its future operating performance. That, in turn, will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the Partnership’s industry, as well as financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond its control.

 

The Partnership revised its budget as of June 30, 2006, to $95.2 million for capital expenditures, exclusive of any acquisitions. As of June 30, 2006, the Partnership has  $69.8 million remaining in their budget consisting of $68.1 million for expansion capital and $1.7 million for sustaining capital. Expansion capital includes expenditures made to expand or increase the efficiency of the existing operating capacity of our assets, or facilitate an increase in volumes within our operations,

 

39



 

whether through construction or acquisition. Sustaining capital includes expenditures to replace partially or fully depreciated assets in order to extend their useful lives.

 

Cash Flows

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

86,594

 

$

25,512

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(47,640

)

(78,090

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(33,650

)

50,112

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $61.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005.  The increase was impacted by a $21.2 million change in operating assets and liabilities primarily a decrease in receivables, offset by purchases of inventory and payment of accounts payables, an additional $17.7 million from non-controlling interest in net income of MarkWest Energy, incremental non-cash losses on derivative instruments of $15.1 million, due to an expanded risk management program, and additional depreciation and amortization expense of $9.3 million, due to acquisitions.

 

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006, decreased by $30.5 million from the same period in 2005, primarily due to the acquisition of Starfish in 2005.  No significant acquisitions were completed in the first six months of 2006.

 

Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006, was $83.8 million more than for the same period in 2005.  The difference related primarily to repayments of debt of $74.2 million.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 

Other than facility and equipment leasing arrangements, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities.

 

Matters Influencing Future Results
 

During August and September 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused severe and widespread damage to oil and gas assets in the Gulf of Mexico and Gulf Coast regions. Operations of our unconsolidated affiliate, Starfish Pipeline Company, were nominally impacted by Hurricane Katrina but were significantly impacted by Hurricane Rita. While Starfish has substantially returned to normal operations, several sections of the system have not been fully repaired and returned to operation. Until necessary repairs are completed, Starfish will not be able to return fully to normal operations, which will have a continuing impact on our net income. We have received $3.1 million in insurance recoveries with respect to our property loss claims, and anticipate continued recovery for expenses and losses incurred as repairs proceed.

 

The loss to both offshore and onshore assets resulting from Hurricane Rita has led to substantial insurance claims within the oil and gas industry. Along with other industry participants, we have seen our insurance costs increase substantially within this region as a result. We have renewed our insurance coverage relating to Starfish during the second quarter and mitigated a portion of the cost increase by reducing our coverage and adding a more broad self-insurance element to our overall coverage.

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. is a corporation for federal income tax purposes. As such, our federal taxable income is subject to tax at a maximum rate of 35.0% under current law and a blended state rate of 3.5%, net of Federal benefit. We expect to have future taxable income allocated to us as a result of our investment in the Partnership.

 

We currently have a net operating loss carryforward of $18.1 million as of December 31, 2005 for federal income taxes. We estimate that our net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized to offset federal taxable income in 2006. In years after 2006 we do not expect to have this net operating loss carryforward to offset our future taxable income. As a result, the amount of money available to make cash distributions to our stockholders will decrease after we utilize all of our net operating loss carryforward.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of these statements requires management to make significant

 

40



 

judgments and estimates. Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these financial statements. A summary of significant accounting policies and a description of accounting policies that are considered critical may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (“SFAS 155”). This statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities and resolves issues addressed in SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets.”  This Statement: (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; (b) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133; (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate beneficial interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and, (e) eliminates restrictions on a qualifying special-purpose entity’s ability to hold passive derivative financial instruments that pertain to beneficial interests that are or contain a derivative financial instrument. The standard also requires presentation within the financial statements that identifies those hybrid financial instruments for which the fair value election has been applied and information on the income statement impact of the changes in fair value of those instruments. The Partnership is required to apply SFAS 155 to all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event beginning January 1, 2007, although early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS 155 is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Partnership.

 

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. FAS No. 156 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities by requiring that they be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements of operations or financial position.

 

In June 2006 the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

41



 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Market risk includes the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices.  We face market risk from commodity price changes and to a lesser extent, interest rate changes.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

Our primary risk management objective is to manage volatility in our cash flows.  A committee, comprised of members of the senior management team, oversees all of our derivative activity.

 

We may utilize a combination of fixed-price forward contracts, fixed-for-floating price swaps and options on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market.  The Company may also enter into futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”).  Swaps and futures contracts allow us to manage volatility in our margins because corresponding losses or gains on the financial instruments are generally offset by gains or losses in our physical positions.

 

We enter into OTC swaps with financial institutions and other energy company counterparties.  We conduct a standard credit review on counterparties and have agreements containing collateral requirements where deemed necessary.  We use standardized swap agreements that allow for offset of positive and negative exposures.  We may be subject to margin deposit requirements under OTC agreements (with non-bank counterparties) and NYMEX positions.

 

The use of derivative instruments may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances when (i) NGL’s do not trade at historical levels relative to crude oil, (ii) sales volumes are less than expected requiring market purchases to meet commitments, or (iii) our OTC counterparties fail to purchase or deliver the contracted quantities of natural gas, NGL’s or crude oil or otherwise fail to perform. To the extent that we enter into derivative instruments, we may be prevented from realizing the benefits of favorable price changes in the physical market. We are similarly insulated, however, against unfavorable changes in such prices.

 

Fair value is based on available market information for the particular derivative instrument, and incorporates the commodity, period, volume and pricing.  Positive (negative) amounts represent unrealized gains (losses).

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon may enter into physical and/or financial positions to manage its risks related to commodity price exposure.  Due to timing of purchases and sales, direct exposure to price volatility can be created, because there is no longer an offsetting purchase or sale that remains exposed to market pricing.  Through marketing and derivatives activities, direct exposure may occur naturally, or we may choose direct exposure when we favor that exposure over frac spread risk. Beginning in 2006 MarkWest Hydrocarbon pre-purchased natural gas for shrink requirements in future months and, for both natural gas and NGLs, has entered into swaps and future sales agreements to manage frac spread risk. These derivative instruments are marked to market.

 

The following table summarizes MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s specific derivative positions at June 30, 2006:

 

Swaps

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed Price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Propane - 6.4 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

$

0.93

 

$

(1,734

)

Propane - 1.8 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.10

 

(190

)

Propane - 1.9 Mm Gal

 

Nov 2006 - Feb 2007

 

1.10

 

(200

)

Propane - 3.0 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Feb 2007

 

1.09

 

(341

)

Propane - 2.8 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.18

 

(100

)

Propane - 6.2 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.10

 

(684

)

Propane - 6.4 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

0.96

 

(1,543

)

Propane - 1.6 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.12

 

(145

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iso-butane - 0.6 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.22

 

(91

)

Iso-butane - 0.7 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.12

 

(208

)

Iso-butane - 0.3 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.35

 

(28

)

Iso-butane - 0.6 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.16

 

(155

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal butane - 1.9 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.21

 

(245

)

Normal butane - 2.0 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.10

 

(500

)

Normal butane - 1.1 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.29

 

(77

)

Normal butane - 1.7 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.13

 

(375

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gasoline - 1.3 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.50

 

(94

)

Natural gasoline - 2.1 Mm Gal

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

1.44

 

(277

)

Natural gasoline - 1.3 Mm Gal

 

Oct-Dec 2006

 

1.39

 

(255

)

Natural gasoline - 1.0 Mm Gal

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

1.59

 

33

 

Natural gasoline - 1.1 Mm Gal

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

1.37

 

(200

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas - 0.9 Mm Mmbtu

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

6.61

 

(267

)

Natural gas - 0.4 Mm Mmbtu

 

Jul-Sep 2006

 

6.43

 

(51

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,727

)

Other

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

Total MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

 

 

$

(7,655

)

 

42



 

The impact of MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s commodity derivative instruments on results of operations and financial position are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2006

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss – revenue

 

$

(6,156

)

$

(7,655

)

 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

Unrealized gains – other current assets

 

$

185

 

$

 

Unrealized loss – current liability

 

 

(7,840

)

 

 

The following table summarizes MarkWest Hydrocarbon’s physical inventory position at June 30, 2006, which could be used in a number of ways, including satisfying shrink requirements or physically settling future sales commitments:

 

Product

 

Quantity

 

Units of Measure

 

Weighted Average Cost

 

Total Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Natural gas

 

2,748,000

 

Mmbtu

 

$

7.03

 

$

19,327

 

NGLs

 

20,857,000

 

Gallons

 

$

0.79

 

16,476

 

Total MarkWest Hydrocarbon

 

$

35,803

 

 

The Company entered into the following derivative positions in July 2006:

 

Swaps

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed Price

 

Propane – 0.9 million Gallons

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

$

 1.13

 

Iso-butane - 0.1 million Gallons

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

$

1.30

 

Normal butane – 0.3 million Gallons

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

$

1.30

 

Natural gasoline – 0.2 million Gallons

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

$

1.63

 

Natural gas - 0.1 Mmbtu

 

Dec 2006 - Mar 2007

 

$

6.66

 

 

MarkWest Energy Partners

 

The Partnership’s primary risk management objective is to reduce volatility in its cash flows arising from changes in commodity prices related to future sales of natural gas, NGL’s and crude oil.  Swaps and futures contracts may allow the Partnership to reduce volatility in its margins, because losses or gains on the derivative instruments generally are offset by corresponding gains or losses in the Partnership’s physical positions.

 

The following table includes information on MarkWest Energy’s specific derivative positions at June 30, 2006:

 

43



 

Costless collars

 

Contract Period

 

Floor

 

Cap

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Crude Oil - 500 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

57.00

 

$

67.00

 

$

(849

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

57.00

 

$

67.00

 

(424

)

Crude Oil - 205 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

57.00

 

$

65.10

 

(409

)

Crude Oil - 78 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

67.50

 

$

77.30

 

(27

)

Crude Oil - 155 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

67.50

 

$

78.55

 

(121

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

67.50

 

$

79.15

 

(175

)

Crude Oil - 200 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

70.00

 

$

75.95

 

(175

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Propane - 20,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

$

0.90

 

$

0.99

 

(737

)

Propane - 10,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.15

 

(132

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ethane - 22,950 Gal/d

 

2006

 

$

0.65

 

$

0.80

 

(198

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural Gas - 1,575 Mmbtu/d

 

2006

 

$

8.67

 

$

10.86

 

803

 

Natural Gas - 1,575 Mmbtu/d

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

$

9.00

 

$

12.50

 

128

 

Natural Gas - 400 Mmbtu/d

 

2007

 

$

8.25

 

$

10.03

 

36

 

Natural Gas - 1,500 Mmbtu/d

 

Apr-Dec 2007

 

$

7.25

 

$

10.25

 

147

 

Natural Gas - 1,500 Mmbtu/d

 

Jan-Mar 2008

 

$

8.00

 

$

11.29

 

(42

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,175

)

 

Swaps

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

62.00

 

$

(614

)

Crude Oil - 185 Bbl/d

 

2006

 

$

61.00

 

(487

)

Crude Oil - 250 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

65.30

 

(926

)

Crude Oil - 140 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

74.10

 

(94

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Propane - 5,000 Gal/d

 

2006

 

$

1.08

 

(104

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas

 

Jun-Oct 2006

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,207

)

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Future purchase / sale contracts

 

Contract Period

 

Fixed price

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Natural Gas - 1.7 million Mmbtu (purchase)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

$

6.07

 

$

(1,349

)

Ethane - 10.8 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

$

0.61

 

(910

)

Propane - 4.9 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

$

1.07

 

(596

)

Other NGLs - 4.2 million Gallons (sale)

 

Jul-Oct 2006

 

$

1.40

 

(214

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,069

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total MarkWest Energy Partners

 

$

(7,451

)

 

The impact of MarkWest Energy’s commodity derivative instruments on results of operations and financial position are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Realized gains (losses) – revenue

 

$

(476

)

$

(251

)

$

63

 

$

(209

)

Unrealized gains (losses) – revenue

 

(6,425

)

11

 

(6,724

)

62

 

Other comprehensive income – changes in fair value

 

 

438

 

 

247

 

Other comprehensive income - settlement

 

 

(222

)

 

(180

)

 

44



 

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

Unrealized gains – other current assets

 

$

1,131

 

$

 

Unrealized losses – current liability

 

(7,924

)

(728

)

Unrealized losses – non-current liability

 

(658

)

 

 

The Partnership entered into the following derivative positions subsequent to June 30, 2006:

 

Costless Collars

 

Contract Period

 

Floor

 

Cap

 

Propane – 23,000 Gal/d

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.28

 

Propane – 30,000 Gal/d

 

Apr07-Dec07

 

$

0.96

 

$

1.16

 

Propane – 30,000 Gal/d

 

July07-Sept07

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.16

 

Propane – 30,000 Gal/d

 

Oct07-Dec07

 

$

0.98

 

$

1.18

 

Crude oil – 130 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

70.00

 

$

88.50

 

Crude oil – 120 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

70.00

 

$

86.40

 

Crude oil – 250 Bbl/d

 

2007

 

$

70.00

 

$

88.25

 

 

Other

 

Contract Period

 

Weighted Average Price

 

Ethane – 50,000 Gal/d (swap)

 

Jan-Mar 2007

 

$

0.78

 

Ethane – 50,000 Gal/d (put)

 

Apr07-Dec07

 

$

0.65

 

 

45



 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our senior management, with participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2006, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2006, as a result of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our certifying officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

Throughout the throughout the first and second quarters of 2006 we have adopted remedial measures to address the deficiencies in our internal controls that were identified on December 31, 2005, and remained in effect on June 30, 2006.

 

Internal Control Environment. In connection with management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2005, we identified, and Deloitte & Touche LLP confirmed, as of December 31, 2005, the presence of an ongoing material weakness related to our internal control environment. Specifically, our control environment did not sufficiently promote effective internal control over financial reporting through the management structure to prevent a material misstatement.

 

In order to remediate this material weakness, we are in the process of fully implementing and standardizing the following processes and procedures, which were initiated in the last two quarters of 2005:

 

      We formalized the monthly account reconciliation process for all balance sheet accounts and have implemented a formal review of reconciliations by our business unit accounting management.

 

      We established a compliance office focused on control deficiency identification and remediation, i.e., purchasing controls, revenue recognition controls, control over non-routine transactions, unusual journal entries, the use of estimates and judgment and application and spreadsheet change controls, that performs ongoing internal control evaluation and assessment and works actively with the process owners in developing appropriate remediation of control deficiencies.

 

      We conducted an entity-level risk assessment, established an internal audit plan and began to execute that internal audit plan. Results are reported directly to our general partner’s audit committee.

 

      We enhanced the segregation of duties controls through the reassignment of accounting personnel and realignment of control processes.

 

      We enhanced entity level controls through the implementation of significant new controls.

 

      We strengthened our disclosure review committee charter to solicit and review input from management personnel throughout the Partnership regarding possible instances of fraud or significant events requiring disclosure.

 

      We implemented a technical accounting issues forum to address non-routine transactions and the use of critical estimates and judgment

 

In addition, we are enhancing employee awareness of our Code of Conduct, ethics and anti-fraud policies, including a revised training program that we began to deliver to all employees in the second quarter of 2006. This includes heightened awareness of the ethics hotline availability and access options. We are also conducting a detailed review and re-documentation of all of our internal control processes and will undertake significant internal control design changes to ensure that all internal control objectives are met.

 

Risk management and accounting for derivative financial instruments. In connection with management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2005, we identified and Deloitte & Touche LLP confirmed, as of December 31, 2005, the presence of an additional material weakness related to our risk management and accounting for derivative financial instruments. We did not have adequate internal controls and

 

46



 

processes in place to support our management’s assertions with respect to the completeness, accuracy and validity of commodity transactions. The design of internal controls over commodity transactions did not support the independent validation of data or control and review of transaction activity. In particular, personnel responsible for executing and entering transactions into commodity accounting systems also had duties that were not compatible with transaction execution and entry.

 

In order to remediate this material weakness, we added the following personnel to our management team in July 2005 and January and June 2006, respectively:

 

      Vice President of Risk and Compliance, to oversee and ensure improvements in our commodity transaction verification and monitoring capabilities; and

 

      Director of Risk Management and staff to establish appropriate verification and monitoring activities associated with our commodity transactions.

 

      Credit Manager, to establish more robust monitoring and reporting processes around our credit concentrations and risk.

 

At the end of the first quarter of 2006 we also segregated our front office (the transaction personnel), mid-office (the controllers), and back-office (the accountants) processes related to our financial commodity transactions and a portion of our physical trading to ensure that proper segregation of duties exists and that the appropriate groups carry out control procedures. We are focused on attaining proper segregation for our remaining physical transaction over the coming months. We are enhancing our risk management policies and procedures related to the review and approval of material purchase or sale contracts that may meet the definition of derivatives. Additionally, we are enhancing our financial analysis around commodity transactions and our reporting to executive management and the board of directors. Finally, we moved the responsibility for credit risk management to the mid-office in the second quarter of 2006.

 

In addition, we have applied compensating procedures and processes as necessary to ensure the reliability of our financial reporting. Such additional procedures included detail management review of our account reconciliations for all accounts in all business units and multiple-level management review of account reconciliations for all accounts in all business. Accordingly, management believes, based on its knowledge, that (i) this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact that would make the statements misleading; (ii) this report does not omit any material fact, the omission of which would make the statements misleading, in light of the circumstance under which they were made with respect to the period covered by this report and (iii) the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

47



 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.             Legal Proceedings
 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to a variety of risks and disputes normally to its business and is a party to various legal proceedings. We maintain insurance policies in amounts and with coverage and deductibles as we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, we cannot assure either that the insurance companies will promptly honor their policy obligations or that the coverage or levels of insurance will be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related to future claims for property loss or business interruption to the Company or for third party claims of personal and property damage, or that the coverages or levels of insurance it presently has will be available in the future at economical prices.

 

In early 2005 MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., the Partnership and several of its affiliates were served with two lawsuits, Ricky J. Conn, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al. (filed February 2, 2005), and Charles C. Reid, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al. (filed February 8, 2005), in Floyd Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Civil Action No. 05-CI-00137 and Civil Action No. 05-CI-00156, which actions on February 24, 2005, were removed to the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Pikeville Division. The Company, the Partnership and its affiliates were served with an additional lawsuit, Community Trust and Investment Co., et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al., filed November 7, 2005,in Floyd County Circuit Court, Kentucky, that added five new claimants but essentially alleged the same facts and claims as the earlier two suits. On March 27, 2006, the U.S. District Court remanded the cases back to Floyd County Circuit Court, Kentucky, and the cases were consolidated into Ricky J. Conn, et al. v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. et al., Floyd Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Civil Action No. 05-CI-00137.

 

These actions are for third-party claims of property and personal injury damages sustained as a consequence of an NGL pipeline leak and an ensuing explosion and fire that occurred on November 8, 2004. The pipeline was owned by an unrelated business entity and leased and operated by the Partnership’s subsidiary, MarkWest Energy Appalachia, LLC. It transports NGLs from the Maytown gas processing plant to the Partnership’s Siloam fractionator. The explosion and fire from the leaked vapors resulted in property damage to five homes and injuries to some of the residents. The pipeline owner, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (“OPS”), and the Partnership continue to investigate the incident. Discovery in the action is now underway following the remand back to state court. The trial is scheduled to begin February 5, 2007.

 

The Company notified its general liability insurance carriers of the incident and the lawsuits in a timely manner and is coordinating its legal defense with the insurers. At this time, the Company believes that it has adequate general liability insurance coverage for third-party property damage and personal injury liability resulting from the incident. The Company has settled with several of the claimants for third-party property damage claims (damage to residences and personal property), and reached settlements for some of the personal injury claims. These have been paid for or reimbursed under the Company’s general liability insurance. As a result, the Company has not provided for a loss contingency.

 

Pursuant to OPS regulation mandates and to a Corrective Action Order issued by the OPS November 18, 2004, pipeline and valve integrity evaluation, testing and repairs were conducted on the affected pipeline segment before service could be resumed. OPS authorized a partial return to service of the affected pipeline in October 2005. MarkWest is in the process of applying for return to full service.

 

In late June 2006 a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty (NOPV) was issued by OPS to both MarkWest Hydrocarbon and the unaffiliated owner of the pipeline, with a proposed penalty in the aggregate amount of $1,070,000. Initial response to the NOPV is not due until at least September 1, 2006, and the Company is likely going to request an administrative hearing and settlement conference with respect to the NOPV.

 

Related to the above referenced pipeline incident, MarkWest Hydrocarbon and the Partnership have filed an independent action captioned MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., et al. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., et al. (District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado, Case No. 05CV3953 filed August 12, 2005), as removed to the (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-1948, on October 7, 2005), against its All-Risks Property and Business Interruption insurance carriers as a result of the companies’ refusal to honor their insurance coverage obligation to pay the Company for certain expenses related to the pipeline incident. These include the Company’s internal expenses and costs incurred for damage to, and loss of use of the pipeline, equipment and products; the extra transportation costs incurred for transporting the liquids while the pipeline was out of service; the reduced volumes of liquids that could be processed; and the costs of complying with the OPS Corrective Action Order (hydrostatic testing, repair/replacement and other pipeline integrity assurance measures). These expenses and costs have been expensed as incurred and any potential recovery from the All-Risks Property and Business Interruption insurance carriers will be treated as “other income” if and when  it is received. The Company has not provided for a receivable for these claims because of the uncertainty as to whether and how much the Company will ultimately recover under the policies. The Company has also asserted that the cost of pipeline testing,

 

48



 

replacement and repair are subject to an equitable sharing arrangement with its owner, pursuant to the terms of the pipeline lease agreement. Discovery in the action is continuing.

 

The Company has also been involved in a lawsuit captioned Ross Bros. Construction v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., (U.S. Court Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 05-6251). This lawsuit involved the expansion construction of the Siloam Kentucky gas processing and fractionation plant and a dispute as to the monetary value of work and additional work beyond the contract’s lump sum price performed by the contractor. This lawsuit involved a claim of approximately $0.7 million in extra costs. The Company was recently granted Summary Judgment on its defense asserting accord and satisfaction. In August 2005, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of the Summary Judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th  Circuit. The case was fully briefed and oral Argument to the 6th Circuit was heard on July 18, 2006, and we are awaiting the ruling from the Court. The Company believes that, while it is not able to predict the outcome of this matter, based on the judge’s discussion on the grant of the summary judgment and denial of Ross Brothers’ motion for reconsideration, it is probable that the Company will prevail in the appeal. As a result, the Company has not provided for a loss contingency.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is a party to various other legal actions. In the opinion of management, none of these actions, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

 

49



 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

 At the close of business on May 5, 2006, the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the Company’s Annual Meeting to be held on June 15, 2006, there were 10,802,448 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 15, 2006, there were not less than 9,993,841 shares or approximately 92.5% of the outstanding stock represented at the meeting and by proxy, therefore establishing the presence of a quorum. The Company’s shareholders were presented with and asked to vote on three proposals. The following are the results of the voting:

 

Proposal No. 1:

 

The election of Donald C. Heppermann, Anne E. Mounsey and Karen L. Rogers as Class I Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the year 2009:

 

 

 

Number of votes

 

Director Nominees

 

For

 

Authority
Withheld

 

Donald C. Heppermann

 

9,842,849

 

150,992

 

Anne E. Mounsey

 

9,498,626

 

495,215

 

Karen L. Rogers

 

9,940,309

 

53,532

 

 

There were no abstentions or broker non-votes applicable to the election of directors.

 

Proposal No. 2:

 

The approval of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which by its terms expires in 2006, including the authorization of 1,000,000 shares available for granting Awards under the 2006 Plan, which includes the transfer of shares remaining under the 1996 Plan:

 

For:

 

6,550,707

 

Against:

 

947,258

 

Abstained:

 

6,052

 

 

Abstentions had the effect of votes “against” this proposal. Broker non-votes were not counted as votes “for” or “against” this proposal and therefore had no impact on the outcome.

 

Proposal No. 3:

 

The ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006:

 

For:

 

9,949,837

 

Against:

 

38,488

 

Abstained:

 

5,516

 

 

Abstentions had the effect of votes “against” this proposal. Broker non-votes were not counted as votes “for” or “against” this proposal and therefore had no impact on the outcome.

 

In accordance with the above, each of the nominees for election to the Board of Directors has received the requisite number of votes required for election and each of proposals numbers two and three have received the requisite number of votes for approval. Accordingly, Mr. Heppermann, Ms. Mounsey and Ms. Rogers have been elected as Class I Directors to serve for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the year 2009. In addition, the adoption of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan effective July 1, 2006, was approved by both a majority of shares being voted as well as a majority of shares outstanding. Finally, the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, was ratified.

 

50



 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

10.1(1)

 

Lease Agreement dated as of April 19, 2006, between MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P. and Park Central Property, L.L.C.

 

 

 

10.2+

 

Gas Processing Agreement dated as of May 10, 2006, between MarkWest Pinnacle, L.P. and Chesapeake Exploration, L.P.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 


(1)

 

Incorporated by reference to MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 25, 2006.

 

 

 

+

 

Application has been made to the Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential treatment of certain provisions of these exhibits. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

51



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.

 

 

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

Date:  August 7, 2006

/s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE

 

 

 

Frank M. Semple

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Date:  August 7, 2006

/s/ NANCY K. MASTEN

 

 

 

Nancy K. Masten

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer

 

52