UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant x   Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

EQUINIX, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

EQUINIX, INC.

301 Velocity Way, Fifth Floor

Foster City, CA 94404

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held June 9, 2009

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Equinix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Equinix”). The meeting will be held at our headquarters located at 301 Velocity Way, Foster City, California, on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. for the following purposes:

1. To elect eight directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009; and

3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the attached Proxy Statement.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 20, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of such stockholders will be available for inspection at our headquarters located at 301 Velocity Way, Fifth Floor, Foster City, California, during ordinary business hours for the 10-day period prior to the Annual Meeting.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS,

/s/ Peter F. Van Camp

Peter F. Van Camp

Executive Chair

Foster City, California

April 30, 2009

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 9, 2009:

THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS ON FORM 10-K ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTP://INVEST.EQUINIX.COM/PHOENIX.ZHTML?C=122662&P=PROXY.

EQUINIX, INC.

301 Velocity Way, Fifth Floor

Foster City, CA 94404

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 9, 2009

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these materials?

We sent you this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card because the Board of Directors of Equinix, Inc. (“Equinix”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. However, you do not need to attend the meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card, or follow the instructions below to submit your proxy over the telephone or on the Internet.

We intend to mail this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card on or about April 30, 2009 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Can I obtain an on-line version of the materials?

This proxy statement and Equinix’s annual report on Form 10-K are available on-line at http://invest.equinix.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122662&p=proxy.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 20, 2009 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On this record date, there were 37,961,820 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If, on April 20, 2009, your shares were registered directly in your name with Equinix’s transfer agent, Computershare, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card or vote by proxy over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

If, on April 20, 2009, your shares were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent.

1

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

Only persons with evidence of stock ownership or who are guests of Equinix may attend and be admitted to the Annual Meeting. Photo identification will be required (a valid driver’s license or passport is preferred). If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, you will need to bring a proxy or a letter from that broker, trust, bank or other nominee, or your most recent brokerage account statement, that confirms that you are the beneficial owner of those shares. For assistance with directions to our headquarters where the Annual Meeting will be held, please call 650-513-7000.

What am I voting on?

There are two matters scheduled for a vote:

How do I vote?

You may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board of Directors or you may abstain from voting for any nominee you specify. For the other matter to be voted on, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting. The procedures for voting are fairly simple:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card, vote by proxy over the telephone, or vote by proxy on the Internet. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the meeting and vote in person if you have already voted by proxy.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, or other agent, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from Equinix. Simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or on the Internet as instructed by your broker or bank. To vote in

2

person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of April 20, 2009.

What if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?

If you return a signed and dated proxy card without marking any voting selections, your shares will be voted “For” the election of all eight nominees for director and “For” the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.

If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxy (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his best judgment.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you receive more than one proxy card, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes.     You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:

3

How are votes counted?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting, who will separately count “For” and (with respect to proposals other than the election of directors) “Against” votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal.

If your shares are held by your broker as your nominee (that is, in “street name”), you will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the instructions included on that form regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. If you do not give instructions to your broker with respect to a “non-discretionary” matter, your shares will not be voted on such matter and will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on such matter. However, such “broker non-votes” will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if at least a majority of the outstanding shares are represented by stockholders present at the meeting or by proxy. On the record date, there were 37,961,820 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus 18,980,911 shares must be represented by stockholders present at the meeting or by proxy to have a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy vote or vote at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the votes present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be published in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2009.

4

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Equinix’s Board of Directors currently consists of eight directors. Equinix’s bylaws provide that the number of directors will be determined by the Board of Directors and the number of directors is currently set at nine. Thus, there is one vacant seat on Equinix’s Board of Directors that Equinix does not intend to fill at this Annual Meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. There are eight nominees for director this year. Each director to be elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected, or until the director’s death, resignation or removal.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes properly cast in person or by proxy. The eight nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the eight nominees named below. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, your shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by Equinix’s Board of Directors. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.

The eight directors who are being nominated for election by the holders of common stock to the Board of Directors, their ages as of March 31, 2009, their positions and offices held with Equinix and certain biographical information are set forth below.

Steven Clontz has served as a director of Equinix since April 2005. Mr. Clontz has been chief executive officer of StarHub Ltd., a telecommunications and cable television company, since January 1999. Mr. Clontz serves on the board of directors of InterDigital Communications Corp. and StarHub Ltd., both public companies, and one privately held company. Mr. Clontz is also a non-director member of the Executive Committee of Global Crossing Limited.

Steven Eng has served as a director of Equinix since December 2002. Mr. Eng has been a vice president of solutions architecture at Multimax, Inc. (formerly Netco Government Services, and prior to that, WAM!NET Government Services, Inc.), a data communications company, since April 2002. Prior to joining WAM!NET, Mr. Eng served as a vice president of Exodus Communications from March 1995 to September 2001. Mr. Eng served on the board of directors of i-STT Singapore prior to its merger with Equinix.

Gary Hromadko has served as a director of Equinix since June 2003. Mr. Hromadko has been a venture partner at Crosslink Capital, a venture capital firm, since June 2002. In addition to his responsibilities with Crosslink Capital, Mr. Hromadko has been active as a private investor since 1993. Mr. Hromadko serves on the board of directors of several privately held companies.

Scott Kriens has served as a director of Equinix since July 2000. Mr. Kriens has served as chairman of the Board of Directors of Juniper Networks, Inc., a publicly traded Internet infrastructure solutions company, since

5

September 2008. From October 1996 to September 2008, Mr. Kriens served as Juniper’s chief executive officer. From April 1986 to January 1996, Mr. Kriens served as vice president of sales and vice president of operations at StrataCom, Inc., a telecommunications equipment company, which he co-founded in 1986.

Irving Lyons, III has served as a director of Equinix since February 2007. Mr. Lyons has been a principal of Lyons Asset Management, a California-based private investment firm, since January 2005. From December 1993 to January 2005, Mr. Lyons was employed at ProLogis, a global provider of distribution facilities and services, where he served as chief investment officer from March 1997 to December 2004 and as vice chairman of the board from December 2001 to January 2005. Mr. Lyons serves on the board of directors of BRE Properties, Inc. a public company.

Christopher Paisley has served as a director of Equinix since July 2007. Mr. Paisley has been the Dean’s Executive Professor of Accounting and Finance at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University since January 2001. From September 1985 until May 2000, Mr. Paisley was the Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of 3Com Corporation. Mr. Paisley currently serves as a director of 3Par Inc. and Volterra Semiconductor Corporation, both public companies, and several privately held companies.

Stephen Smith has served as a director of Equinix and as Equinix’s chief executive officer and president since April 2007. Prior to joining Equinix, Mr. Smith served as senior vice president at HP Services, a business segment of Hewlett-Packard Co., from January 2005 to October 2006. Prior to joining Hewlett-Packard Co., Mr. Smith served as vice president of global professional and managed services at Lucent Technologies Inc., a communications solutions provider, from September 2003 to January 2005. From October 1987 to September 2003, he spent 17 years with Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”), a business and technology solutions company, in a variety of positions, including chief sales officer, president of EDS Asia-Pacific, and president of EDS Western Region. Mr. Smith serves on the board of directors of one privately held company.

Peter Van Camp has served as Equinix’s executive chair since April 2007. Prior to becoming executive chair, Mr. Van Camp served as Equinix’s chief executive officer and as a director since May 2000 and as president since March 2006. In addition, in December 2005, Mr. Van Camp was re-elected as chairman of the board, having previously served in that capacity from June 2001 to December 2002. From January 1997 to May 2000, Mr. Van Camp was employed at UUNET, the Internet division of MCI (formerly known as WorldCom), where he served as president of Internet markets and as president of the Americas region. During the period from May 1995 to January 1997, Mr. Van Camp was president of Compuserve Network Services, an Internet access provider. Before holding this position, Mr. Van Camp held various positions at Compuserve, Inc. during the period from October 1982 to May 1995.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” EACH NAMED NOMINEE

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Governance Committee

In May 2008, the Board of Directors established a Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”) to (i) oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors and (ii) review and consider developments in corporate governance practices and to recommend to the Board of Directors a set of effective corporate governance policies and procedures applicable to Equinix. A more detailed description on the functions of the Governance Committee can be found in the Governance Committee Charter, published on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors follows the Equinix, Inc. Board of Directors Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues (the “Guidelines”) published on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com. The Guidelines reflect the Board of Director’s dedication to monitoring the effectiveness of policy and decision-making at the Board of Director’s level. In conjunction with the Governance Committee, the Board of Directors will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these Guidelines.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors is comprised of eight directors, six of whom qualify as independent directors pursuant to the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to the corporate governance standards for companies listed on the NASDAQ National Market System. The Board of Directors has determined that all of Equinix’s directors are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ listing standards, except for Mr. Smith, Equinix’s chief executive officer and president, and Mr. Van Camp, Equinix’s executive chair. The Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Real Estate Committees of the Board of Directors consist entirely of independent directors.

Nomination of Directors

The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Nominating Committee”) operates pursuant to a written charter and has the exclusive right to recommend candidates for election as directors to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including being able to read and understand basic financial statements, having high moral character, having business experience, and being over 21 years of age. The Nominating Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees is as follows: in the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to Equinix during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any transactions of such directors with Equinix during their term. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating Committee first determines whether the nominee must be independent for NASDAQ purposes, which determination is based upon the Guidelines, the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating Committee may then use its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. The Nominating Committee will then meet to discuss and consider such candidates’ qualifications and choose candidate(s) for recommendation to the Board of Directors.

The Nominating Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders wishing to recommend candidates for consideration by the Nominating Committee may do so by writing to the Secretary of Equinix and providing the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. The Nominating Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether the candidate was recommended by a stockholder.

7

A more detailed description on the functions of the Nominating Committee can be found in the Nominating Committee Charter, published on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Interested parties may contact the Board of Directors by sending correspondence to the attention of Equinix’s Secretary, c/o Equinix, Inc., 301 Velocity Way, Fifth Floor, Foster City, California 94404. Any mail received by the Secretary, except improper commercial solicitations, will be forwarded to the members of Equinix’s Audit Committee for their further action, if necessary. Equinix does not have a policy requiring attendance by members of the Board of Directors at Equinix’s annual meetings. At Equinix’s 2008 Annual Meeting, Mr. Smith was in attendance and available for questions.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

Equinix has always taken the issue of corporate governance seriously. The Board of Directors has adopted (1) a Code of Business Conduct which applies to all directors, officers and employees and (2) an additional Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. These documents can be found on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com. In addition, an anonymous reporting hotline has been established to facilitate reporting of violations of financial and non-financial policies.

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Board of Directors held six meetings. For the fiscal year, during his period of service, each of the incumbent directors attended or participated in at least 83% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which each such director served. In the event any director missed a meeting, he would separately discuss material items with Messrs. Smith or Van Camp. The Board of Directors has six standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee, the Nominating Committee, the Real Estate Committee and the Stock Award Committee. The following table provides membership information for the incumbent directors for fiscal 2008 for such committees of the Board of Directors:

The Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”) was created on July 19, 2000. A detailed description of the Audit Committee can be found in the section entitled “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” elsewhere in this proxy statement. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Eng, Hromadko and Paisley. Mr. Paisley is chairman of the Audit Committee and considered its financial expert. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee held 11 meetings.

The Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) was created on July 19, 2000. The Compensation Committee oversees, reviews and administers all of Equinix’s compensation, equity and employee benefit plans and programs relating to executive officers, including the named executive officers, approves the

8

global guidelines for the compensation program for Equinix’s non-executive employees and approves Equinix’s projected global equity usage. The Compensation Committee also acts periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of the compensation programs at Equinix and considers recommendations from management regarding new compensation programs and changes to those already in existence. In addition, the Compensation Committee is consulted to approve the compensation package of a newly hired executive or of an executive whose scope of responsibility has changed significantly. A more detailed description of the functions of the Compensation Committee can be found in the Compensation Committee Charter, published on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Eng, Kriens and Lyons. Mr. Eng is chairman of the Compensation Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee held eight meetings.

The Governance Committee was created on May 22, 2008 and its functions are described above in the section entitled “Governance Committee”. The members of the Governance Committee are Messrs. Paisley and Van Camp. Mr. Van Camp is chairman of the Governance Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Governance Committee held two meetings.

The Nominating Committee was created on December 30, 2002 and its functions are described above in the section entitled “Nomination of Directors”. The members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Eng, Hromadko and Kriens. Mr. Eng is chairman of the Nominating Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Nominating Committee held one meeting.

The Real Estate Committee (the “Real Estate Committee”) was created on August 11, 2005. The Board of Directors has delegated to the Real Estate Committee the authority to analyze, negotiate and approve the purchase of, or the option to purchase, real property, analyze, negotiate and approve the lease or sublease of, or the option to lease or sublease, real property, approve certain expenditures in connection with real estate development, expansion or acquisition and certain adjustments to previously approved expenditures, and, subject to the general terms approved by the full Board of Directors, analyze, negotiate and approve financing transactions for the sale, lease or sublease of real property. The members of the Real Estate Committee are Messrs. Hromadko, Lyons and Paisley. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Real Estate Committee held six meetings.

The Stock Award Committee (the “Stock Award Committee”) was created on July 19, 2000. The Board of Directors has delegated to the Stock Award Committee the authority to approve the grant of stock awards to non-officer employees and other individuals. The members of the Stock Award Committee are Messrs. Eng and Smith. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Stock Award Committee held no meetings but acted solely by written consent.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee was formed on July 19, 2000 and the current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Eng, Kriens and Lyons. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during the 2008 fiscal year or at any other time an officer or employee of Equinix. No executive officer of Equinix serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of Equinix.

9

2008 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Equinix uses a combination of cash and equity-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors. In setting director compensation, Equinix considers the competitive compensation market for directors in the high-technology market, the demands of the various roles that directors hold, and the time required to fulfill their duties to Equinix.

Non-employee directors receive a retainer in connection with their service on the Board of Directors. In 2008, the annual retainer was $24,000. In addition, in 2008, non-employee directors received compensation of $3,000 per meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors actually attended and the chairman of a committee received compensation of $5,000 per committee meeting actually attended.

Beginning in 2009, the annual retainer will be $35,000. In addition, in lieu of regular meeting fees, beginning in 2009, committee chairs (if any) and members will receive the following annual retainers, payable quarterly in arrears:

In 2009, non-employee directors will only receive fees for attendance at committee meetings in excess of a specified number of meetings. The 2009 committee meeting fees and the threshold number of meetings that must be attended before any fees will be earned are:

Non-employee directors are eligible to receive options under Equinix’s 2000 Director Option Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”). Directors are also eligible to receive options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards under Equinix’s 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), and directors who are also employees of Equinix, but who do not beneficially own 5% or more of the common stock of Equinix, are eligible to participate in Equinix’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

In 2008, upon joining the Board of Directors each non-employee director would receive an option for 15,000 shares of Equinix’s common stock, or 20,000 shares if the new non-employee director was chairman of the Audit Committee. These options would vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments from the date of grant. In addition, at each of Equinix’s annual stockholders’ meetings, each non-employee director who continued to be a director after that meeting was automatically granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Equinix’s common stock. These options become fully vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant. However, a new non-employee director who received an initial option was not eligible to receive an annual option in the same calendar year. The options granted to our directors will become fully vested if Equinix is subject to a change-in-control.

10

Beginning in 2009, non-employee directors will receive automatic grants of restricted stock units (RSUs). Each non-employee director will receive an award of RSUs upon joining the Board of Directors with a grant date fair value of $285,000, which will vest in four equal annual installments from the date of grant. In addition, at each of Equinix’s annual stockholders’ meetings, each non-employee director who will continue to be a director after that meeting will automatically be granted an award of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $175,000, which will become fully vested on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant. However, a new non-employee director who received an initial RSU award will not be eligible to receive an annual RSU award in the same calendar year. The number of shares subject to each RSU award will be equal to the dollar value of the award divided by the closing price of Equinix’s common stock on the date of grant. The RSUs granted to our directors will become fully vested if Equinix is subject to a change-in-control.

The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each person who served as a director during fiscal year 2008.

11

OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following are additional executive officers of Equinix, their ages as of March 31, 2009, their positions and offices held with Equinix and certain biographical information. All serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Jarrett Appleby has served as Equinix’s chief marketing officer since December 2008. Prior to joining Equinix, Mr. Appleby served as chief strategy and marketing officer at Reliance Globalcom LTD, a global telecommunications company, from August 2006 to December 2008. From January 2006 to December 2007, Mr. Appleby was founder and chief executive officer of ILV Group, a business advisory and consulting company. Before starting ILV Group, Mr. Appleby served as senior vice president of strategy & corporate development for MCI (now Verizon Business), a global telecommunications company, from September 2005 to February 2006, and as senior vice president of MCI Solutions (now Verizon Business), a managed services company, from May 2003 to September 2005.

Peter Ferris has served as Equinix’s president, Equinix US since January 2008. Previously, he served as Equinix’s senior vice president, worldwide sales from December 2006 to January 2008 and as vice president, worldwide sales from July 1999 to December 2006. During the period from June 1997 to July 1999, Mr. Ferris was vice president of sales for Frontier Global Center, a provider of complex web site hosting services. From June 1996 to June 1997, Mr. Ferris served as vice president, eastern sales at Genuity Inc., an Internet services provider. From December 1993 to June 1996, Mr. Ferris was vice president, mid-Atlantic sales at MFS DataNet Inc., a telecommunications services provider.

Eric Schwartz has served as Equinix’s president, Equinix Europe since June 2008. Previously, he served as Equinix’s chief development officer from January 2008 to June 2008 and as vice president, strategy and services from May 2006 to January 2008. Prior to joining Equinix, Mr. Schwartz was vice president of IP Communications at BellSouth, a telecommunications company, from November 1997 to February 2006.

Keith D. Taylor has served as Equinix’s chief financial officer since September 2005. From February 2001 to September 2005, Mr. Taylor served as Equinix’s vice president, finance and chief accounting officer. In addition, from February 1999 to February 2001, Mr. Taylor served as Equinix’s director of finance and administration. Before joining Equinix, Mr. Taylor was employed by International Wireless Communications, Inc., an operator, owner and developer of wireless communication networks, as vice president finance and interim chief financial officer. Prior to joining International Wireless Communications, Inc., Mr. Taylor was employed by Becton Dickinson & Company, a medical and diagnostic device manufacturer, as a senior sector analyst for the diagnostic businesses in Asia, Latin America and Europe.

12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2009, certain information with respect to shares beneficially owned by (i) each person who is known by Equinix to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of Equinix’s outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of Equinix’s directors and nominees, (iii) each of the executive officers named in Executive Compensation and Related Information, and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Under this rule, certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire shares (for example, upon exercise of an option or warrant) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of such acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the following table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual voting power at any particular date. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed stockholder is c/o Equinix, Inc., 301 Velocity Way, Fifth Floor, Foster City, CA 94404.

13

14

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

Equinix’s overall compensation philosophy is designed to provide competitive compensation and benefits programs globally to attract and retain top performing employees utilizing a pay for performance philosophy at both the company and individual level. The Compensation Committee and the management of Equinix believe that the quality, skills and dedication of Equinix’s executive officers are critical factors affecting our long-term value. The various elements of compensation are designed to link and reward individual performance and the performance of Equinix in achieving financial and non-financial objectives. The Compensation Committee and the management of Equinix also believe that the proportion of compensation at risk should rise as an employee’s level of responsibility increases. This philosophy is reflected in Equinix’s strategic compensation design priorities: pay for performance, alignment with stockholders’ interests, employee attraction and retention, cost management and internal pay equity.

In 2008, we delivered revenue growth of 68% and EBITDA (defined below) growth of 88% over 2007. These results follow a strong 2007, with revenue growth of 46% and EBITDA growth of 52% over 2006. We feel our compensation objectives and pay for performance philosophy support these results. We will continue to link our compensation programs to Equinix’s performance in the aim to encourage strong growth and value creation for stockholders in the future.

Overview

Named Executive Officers

This discussion describes Equinix’s executive compensation policies and decisions as they relate to the individuals who served as Equinix’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer during 2008, as well as the other individuals included in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement, referred to as the named executive officers. Those individuals are:

In April 2008, Mr. Willner announced his intention to step down from his role as president, Equinix Europe. He agreed to remain employed by Equinix until June 1, 2008 and thereafter he continued to serve on the board of Equinix Europe, an Equinix subsidiary. It was further announced that Mr. Schwartz, at that time Equinix’s chief development officer, would assume the role of president, Equinix Europe upon Mr. Willner’s departure. Further details of Equinix’s compromise agreement with Mr. Willner can be found elsewhere in this discussion and in the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” elsewhere in this proxy statement. Additionally, details on Mr. Schwartz’s compensation can be found elsewhere in this discussion.

In July 2008, Ms. Backaus announced her intention to step down from her role as chief business officer. She agreed to remain employed by Equinix through February 15, 2009 although her hours were reduced, effective

15

November 1, 2008, to 50% through December 31, 2008 and 20% thereafter. Further details of Equinix’s agreement with Ms. Backaus can be found elsewhere in this discussion and in the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” elsewhere in this proxy statement.

2008 Program Objectives

The Compensation Committee of the Equinix Board of Directors oversees, reviews and administers all of Equinix’s compensation, equity and employee benefit plans and programs relating to executive officers, including the named executive officers, approves the global guidelines for the compensation program for Equinix’s non-executive employees and approves Equinix’s projected global equity usage. The Compensation Committee also acts periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of the compensation programs at Equinix and considers recommendations from its consultant, Compensia, Inc., and management regarding new compensation programs and changes to those already in existence. The Compensation Committee’s objectives are to align executive compensation with Equinix’s long-term and short-term business objectives and performance and to ensure that the compensation paid to each executive officer, including the named executive officers, reflects Equinix’s performance and the executive officer’s own contribution to Equinix and his or her level of performance. The Compensation Committee applies its judgment in determining the amount and mix of compensation elements for each executive officer. A significant percentage of total compensation is tied to performance as a result of the philosophy mentioned above. Though the Compensation Committee balances each compensation element for each executive officer individually, in 2008 the average overall pay mix for our named executive officers was as follows:

(Based on the market value of the equity awards on the date first discussed and considered by the Compensation Committee in December 2007.)

(Excluding Mr. Willner, whose compensation for 2008 was approved by the Compensation Committee in August 2007 and became effective upon the closing of the acquisition of IXEurope in September 2007.)

In making compensation decisions for the 2008 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee assessed compensation levels against data provided by Compensia, Inc. and approved compensation plans taking into account individual performance and our competitive market for talent, including a select peer group of companies against which we benchmark our performance and executive compensation programs.

Pay Positioning and Process for Reviewing and Adjusting Executive Pay

Our goal is to provide total cash compensation targeted between the 50^th and 75^th percentiles of market competitive pay practices when targeted levels of performance are achieved as determined by the annual operating plan approved by the Board of Directors. We generally target equity at the 75-90^th percentile to aggressively align executive performance and rewards to company results and stockholder interests; however, if performance results or specific retention concerns justify it, we may go above this threshold. In 2007, Equinix participated in the AON/Radford High Technology survey as well as benchmarked to a special cut of the survey which included select sector companies with revenues from $200 million to $1 billion, with average revenues of $600 million. We consider this our competitive market. Our annual revenues were approximately $705.0 million in 2008. In addition, a select peer group was chosen from our competitive market by identifying companies from our Radford special report of data in our select sectors (software, hardware, telecommunications), of our size ($200 million to $1 billion in revenues), and aligned to Equinix in terms of organizational make-up and competition for employees and business. In addition, direct competitors and peers used by Equinix for other business analysis and comparisons were added. The select peer group was reviewed and verified by the chief

16

executive officer and the Compensation Committee. Our select peer group will be reviewed annually to ensure it reflects changes in our market and competitors for business and talent. For 2008, our select peer group consisted of the following companies:

The Compensation Committee targets total cash compensation for the executive officers, including the named executive officers, between the 50^th and 75^th market percentiles to provide competitive base salary, annual incentive compensation and health and welfare benefits that will attract and retain top talent, while offering long-term equity compensation between the 75^th and 90^th percentiles in recognition of strong corporate performance that will set us apart from our competitors and serve as a market place differentiator. Executive pay is reviewed at least annually to determine positioning to the marketplace. After this review, if an element of compensation is found to be below the targeted level, a recommendation may be made to adjust that element of compensation in light of our compensation philosophy and individual performance. Likewise, if the review shows an element of our compensation to be above the targeted level, that data is also taken into consideration in determining compensation position and movement for that individual.

The 2008 compensation proposals were first considered by the Compensation Committee in October 2007 and approved in December 2007 and January 2008. In addition to reviewing executive officers’ compensation against the competitive market and select peer group, the Compensation Committee also considers recommendations from the chief executive officer regarding each compensation element for the executive officers who report directly to him in alignment with their individual performance. The chief executive officer, as the manager of the members of the executive team, assesses the named executive officers’ contributions to Equinix’s performance and makes a recommendation to the Compensation Committee with respect to any merit increase in salary, annual incentive compensation and equity refresh grant for each named executive officer, other than himself. The Compensation Committee meets to evaluate, discuss and modify or approve these recommendations, and to conduct a similar evaluation of the chief executive officer’s performance against corporate objectives established by agreement of the chief executive officer and the Compensation Committee. The other named executive officers do not play a role in their own compensation determinations, other than discussing individual performance objectives with the chief executive officer.

Members of management support the Compensation Committee in its work. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority under its charter to engage the services of independent outside counsel, consultants, accountants and other independent advisers to assist the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties. In accordance with this authority, beginning in 2006, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Compensia, Inc. to advise the Compensation Committee on matters related to compensation for executive officers and other key employees, and on best practices to follow as they review and make decisions on Equinix’s compensation programs.

In connection with the 2008 compensation decisions, Compensia, Inc. prepared and presented the Compensation Committee with an executive compensation study, assessing Equinix’s current and proposed executive pay and financial performance as compared to its select peer group, and a detailed market assessment of Equinix’s current and proposed equity programs. In addition, Compensia, Inc. provided the Compensation

17

Committee with “tally sheets” outlining the total dollar compensation paid to each named executive officer in 2007 and proposed for 2008, including base salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term equity compensation, and other compensation. In addition, the tally sheets outlined and quantified the potential payments upon termination or change-in-control that would be paid to each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee used the tally sheet information as a basis for understanding recommended changes to components of our executive compensation program.

In addition, the Compensation Committee was provided by management with an analysis of the unvested shares held by each named executive officer, the potential value of those unvested shares over a four-year period, and how that value compares to the select peer group for similar positions. This analysis allows the Compensation Committee to evaluate the degree to which unvested shares held by a named executive officer hold retention value.

During 2008, Compensia, Inc. also provided an overall equity analysis and structure for the global Equinix employee program, for implementation in 2009. In the current market downturn, our 2009 equity programs are as stated in our targeted market positioning and philosophy and aligned to current market values.

Compensia, Inc. continues to advise the Compensation Committee on an on-going basis and a representative from the firm attends all Compensation Committee meetings.

Our chief executive officer attended all but one Compensation Committee meeting in 2008 and reviewed and provided input on agendas and compensation proposals and recommendations brought before the Compensation Committee for review and approval.

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Base Salary

Base salary for the executive officers is established based on the underlying scope of their respective responsibilities, taking into account competitive market compensation data by benchmarking salaries paid in our competitive market and select peer group. In 2008, most executive salaries were positioned within the 50^th and 75^th market percentiles except where a salary below the 50^th percentile was needed to position the executive within the 50^th and 75^th market percentiles for total cash compensation. Salary adjustments are based on competitive market salaries and general levels of market increases in salaries, individual performance and experience, internal equity, changes in job duties and responsibilities, and overall financial results. In October and December 2007, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of executive base salaries. As a result of that review, in December 2007 the Compensation Committee approved a March 1, 2008 increase in the salaries of our named executive officers as reflected in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement. For 2008, base salary increases for our named executive officers ranged from approximately 4% to 25%, based upon role, performance and market data. The majority of base salary increases were driven by the continued movement in the competitive market and our desire to keep base pay aligned to our stated philosophy. Mr. Willner did not receive an increase in base salary as he had recently joined Equinix in connection with the acquisition of IXEurope. In June 2008, Mr. Schwartz’s base salary was increased to $270,000, an increase of 8%, in connection with his promotion to president, Equinix Europe.

For 2009, base salary increases for our employees, including our executive officers, were delayed due to the economic environment.

Annual Incentive Compensation

Annual incentive compensation for the named executive officers is linked to the attainment of Equinix’s corporate goals through a cash incentive plan that calculates payouts based on Equinix’s growth. Accordingly, in January 2008, the Compensation Committee adopted the 2008 annual incentive plan, pursuant to which all regular non-sales commissioned part-time and full-time employees were eligible to earn annual cash bonuses.

18

Under the 2008 annual incentive plan, the Compensation Committee assigned each named executive officer an annual maximum bonus amount tied to the achievement of specific goals related to EBITDA (defined as income or loss from operations before depreciation, amortization, accretion, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring charges and any gains or losses from asset sales) as set forth in the 2008 operating plan approved by the Board of Directors. For 2008, having achieved a global market leadership position, we became more focused on the ability to drive increased EBITDA, consistent with the expectations of a company in a market leadership position, and thus tied the 2008 annual incentive plan to solely that metric. The maximum bonus set for each named executive officer was based on targets for comparable positions in our competitive market and select peer group and was stated in terms of a percentage of the named executive officer’s base salary for the year. Under the 2008 annual incentive plan, as a percentage of base salary, maximum bonuses were as follows:

100% of the 2008 annual incentive plan was to be funded if Equinix achieved the Board of Directors approved EBITDA goal in the 2008 operating plan. For every 1% below operating plan for EBITDA, the annual incentive plan pool would be reduced by 20% and there would be no pool if either revenue or EBITDA were 95% or less than the operating plan targets. Under the 2008 annual incentive plan design, the EBITDA goal would be adjusted for extraordinary events, such as expansion centers or acquisitions, not contemplated in the operating plan. The Board of Directors approved revenue and EBITDA goals for 2008 were $669 million and $252 million, respectively. The goals set were consistent with bookings growth we had experienced in the past, while taking into account the available inventory in each of our markets. The goals also contemplated strong growth in Europe and Asia, investment in headcount and key areas to scale Equinix to the appropriate operating level and continued expansion in key markets where inventory was limited or would become limited during the year. No adjustments were made to such goals during 2008.

In 2008, we reported revenues of approximately $705.0 million and EBITDA of approximately $293.0 million – increases of 68% and 88%, respectively, over the prior year. Thus, for 2008, Equinix achieved results that funded 100% of the 2008 annual incentive plan. Cash bonus awards paid reflected these results. The 2008 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement sets forth the actual incentive compensation earned by the named executive officers for performance in 2008 (paid in full during March of 2009).

In addition to the 2008 annual incentive plan, a 2008 quarterly revenue plan applied to Mr. Ferris, our president, Equinix U.S. Under this plan, Mr. Ferris had the opportunity to earn up to 20% of his base salary based upon quarterly revenue targets for the U.S., as set forth in the Board of Directors-approved operating plan. This additional incentive compensation was created to maintain Mr. Ferris’s total cash opportunity as he transitioned from a sales commission plan to the annual incentive plan as he assumed his new role as president, Equinix U.S. For 2008, Mr. Ferris earned $58,000 under this quarterly revenue plan, the maximum allowable.

For fiscal 2009, the Compensation Committee has implemented the 2009 annual incentive plan pursuant to which bonuses are linked to the attainment of Equinix’s corporate goals through a cash incentive plan that calculates payouts based on Equinix’s achievement of an EBITDA target. Under the 2009 annual incentive plan, as a percentage of base salary, maximum bonuses are as follows:

19

The actual bonuses can range from 0% to 100% of the target amounts. The payout percentage depends on the degree to which we attain or exceed Equinix’s approved operating plan and each individual’s performance. In addition, at its discretion the Compensation Committee may reduce or eliminate the actual award that otherwise would be payable should economic conditions warrant it. The 2009 EBITDA goal set by the Board of Directors is designed to motivate management to fully capitalize on Equinix’s potential and deliver maximum value to stockholders. The goal is consistent with bookings growth we have experienced in the past, while taking into account the available inventory in each of our markets and unfolding global economic conditions. The goal also contemplates growth in the U.S., Europe and Asia and significant investment in headcount and key initiatives to scale Equinix to the appropriate operating level. In addition, Equinix will continue to expand in key existing markets where inventory is limited or will become limited in the current year and where we see customer demand. Any single failure to achieve this revenue growth, a delay in anticipated inventory becoming available to us to sell, or over-spending on corporate initiatives will negatively affect our ability to meet the EBITDA goal.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

Since 2005, all equity awards to the named executive officers of Equinix have primarily been grants of performance-based restricted stock or restricted stock units. Such a grant gives the named executive officer the right to receive a specified number of shares or units of Equinix common stock, at no cost to the executive officer, if he or she remains employed by Equinix until the award vests. Unlike a stock option, whether or not a restricted stock or stock unit grant has compensation value does not depend solely on future stock price increases. Restricted stock and stock units can therefore deliver greater share for share compensation value at grant than stock options. As a result, restricted stock and stock unit grant sizes are generally smaller than stock option grants. This issuance of fewer shares also has a favorable impact on our burn rate resulting in less dilution for our stockholders. To date, the restricted stock and stock unit awards to our named executive officers have generally contained performance vesting triggers with additional service requirements upon the performance triggers being met. The Compensation Committee believes that restricted stock and stock unit awards with performance-based vesting encourage executive performance by focusing on long-term growth and profitability which it believes are the primary drivers of stockholder value creation. Other than awards granted to new hires, since 2005 the only solely service-based award granted to executive officers was a grant in 2007 to aid in the transition of a new chief executive officer.

Generally, a market competitive equity grant is made in the year that an executive officer commences employment with Equinix. Thereafter, a refresh grant is generally made during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The size of each grant is set at a level between the 75^th and 90^th market percentiles that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate to create a meaningful opportunity to realize value from equity based upon the individual’s position with Equinix, the individual’s potential for future responsibility and promotion, the individual’s performance in the recent period, Equinix’s performance in the recent period, the competitive marketplace trends, and the retention value of unvested options or shares held by the individual at the time of the new grant.

In January 2008, the Compensation Committee granted awards of restricted stock units to Equinix’s named executive officers with both performance and service vesting triggers. For the first time since 2005, the grants were not tied to stock price performance as that metric was deemed to no longer serve as an accurate measure of Equinix’s success. Instead, vesting was made entirely dependent upon Equinix’s 2008 performance against the same revenue and EBITDA targets used in the 2008 annual incentive plan—common measures of company performance amongst our select peer group and key metrics to measure Equinix’s continued long-term value. 80% of the shares issuable under the restricted stock unit awards would vest over three years upon satisfaction of 95% of Equinix’s revenue and EBITDA goals for 2008 of $669 million and $252 million, respectively. 20% of the shares issuable under the restricted stock unit awards would vest over three years upon satisfaction of an above target EBITDA goal for 2008 of $255 million to align executive pay to a critical stretch goal that helps drive long-term company performance. The goals could be adjusted from time to time to take into account

20

extraordinary events, such as expansion centers or acquisitions, not contemplated in the operating plan, though no adjustments were made in 2008. The vesting schedule and the number of shares granted were established to ensure a meaningful incentive in each year following the year of grant and to align executive behavior with long-term stockholder value creation.

As stated above, for 2008 we reported revenues of approximately $705.0 million and EBITDA of approximately $293.0 million. Thus, for 2008, Equinix achieved results that triggered the vesting of the initial portion of such restricted stock units. The awards will vest in full in 2011.

The 2008 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table in this proxy statement sets forth the restricted stock unit awards received by the named executive officers in 2008 and further details regarding their vesting.

In March 2009, the Compensation Committee granted awards of restricted stock units to Equinix’s named executive officers with both performance and service vesting triggers. In granting such awards, the Compensation Committee discussed current market trends and developments in light of the current economic downturn, and sized the awards with this in mind.

Schwartz Expatriate Agreement

In April 2008, the Compensation Committee approved an expatriate agreement for Mr. Schwartz in connection with his assumption of the leadership role of Equinix’s European business, headquartered in London, England, in June 2008. Mr. Schwartz’s international assignment is anticipated to continue for approximately two years. In addition to his base salary and continued participation in Equinix’s annual incentive plans, under the expatriate agreement Mr. Schwartz is entitled to benefits that are designed to minimize the financial impact of the expatriate assignment and minimize the disruption to his family of the overseas location. Among the benefits offered are tax equalization payments, participation in an international health plan for Mr. Schwartz and his family, housing assistance, dependent education costs, and an annual cost of living payment of $35,920 to address the higher cost of living in London. Additional details regarding Mr. Schwartz’s expatriate agreement may be found elsewhere in this discussion and proxy statement.

Severance, Change-in-Control and other Post-Employment Programs

In August 2007, the Compensation Committee reviewed Equinix’s severance and change-in-control programs as compared to current market practices. This review was suggested by Compensia, Inc. as a best practice for the Compensation Committee but was also driven by Equinix’s growth and the recruitment of new executives. As a result of that review, certain changes were implemented to such programs as described in further detail below.

We have entered into a severance agreement as a part of each current named executive officer’s offer of employment which provides for a severance payment equal to the named executive officer’s annual base salary and maximum bonus in the event his employment is terminated for any reason other than cause or he voluntarily resigns under certain circumstances as described in the agreement. In addition, under the agreement, the named executive officer is entitled to the payment of his monthly health care premiums under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act for up to 12 months. In the case of Mr. Schwartz, such benefits are contingent upon a change-in-control of Equinix. Mr. Smith’s severance agreement also provides that any restricted stock outstanding on the date of termination will vest pro rata as to any partially completed installment. The severance program is a competitive element of executive recruitment and compensation, and allows for a temporary source of income in the event of an executive’s involuntary termination of employment.

In 2008, all existing severance agreements were amended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, all severance agreements were amended to provide for a three-year term. Prior to this amendment, the severance agreements had no term. The imposition of a three-year term was requested by the Compensation Committee to allow for the reevaluation of this severance benefit

21

on a periodic basis to align it with changing market practices. The amendments also specify that an executive cannot voluntarily resign for four months following a change-in-control of Equinix and still trigger the benefits under the severance agreement. This “stay-put” clause was also requested by the Compensation Committee to require that executives stay to assist with any transition after a change-in-control.

Mr. Schwartz’s expatriate agreement provides that upon his repatriation Equinix will use reasonable efforts to find a comparable position for him in Foster City, California or another mutually agreed upon location. If, at that time, no comparable position is available for him in the United States, he will receive a severance payment equal to 12 months’ base salary and a payment that is representative of his pro-rata bonus for the year in which he returns from his assignment, in exchange for a signed waiver and release. If Mr. Schwartz becomes eligible for severance payments under his expatriate agreement and also under his severance agreement described above he will receive the severance payment which is more beneficial.

Options and restricted shares granted to the named executive officers of Equinix prior to 2008 provide for 12 months vesting acceleration upon a change-in-control of Equinix, regardless of whether any applicable stock price appreciation targets have been obtained. This practice is no longer considered to be consistent with best practices and was eliminated in the 2008 equity grants to the named executive officers. Further, under our equity incentive plans, a named executive officer’s awards granted prior to February 2008 will vest in full should he be involuntarily terminated, or should he voluntarily resign under certain circumstances, within 18 months following the transaction. In February 2008, the Compensation Committee amended our equity incentive plans to eliminate this provision. Restricted stock or stock unit awards granted to our named executive officers after February 2008 will only vest as to 50% (and options will vest as to 0%) of the outstanding unvested portion of such awards, in connection with an involuntarily termination or voluntary resignation under certain circumstances, within 12 months following a change-in-control, in the case of an involuntary termination, and between the date that is four months following a change-in-control and the date that is 12 months following a change-in-control, in the case of a voluntary resignation. These amendments were designed to further align our equity acceleration provisions with best practices.

We believe some provision for acceleration of equity awards in connection with changes-in-control protects the stockholders’ interests by encouraging our executive officers to continue to devote their attention to their duties and to facilitate an acquisition with minimized distraction, and by neutralizing bias the officers might have in evaluating acquisition proposals. In addition, we believe that the events triggering payment, both a change-in-control and an involuntary termination, and then only when there is no misconduct by the officer, are fair hurdles for the ensuing rewards.

Willner Compromise Agreement

In April 2008, we entered into a compromise agreement with Mr. Willner which superseded the severance benefits he was previously entitled to as president, Equinix Europe. Pursuant to the compromise agreement, Mr. Willner and Equinix agreed that his employment would end on June 1, 2008 but that he would continue to serve as the non-executive chairman of an Equinix subsidiary. Further, Equinix agreed to pay Mr. Willner a pro-rated annual bonus of £68,750, continue his health benefits until March 2009, and accelerate the vesting of 23,218 restricted stock units granted to Mr. Willner in September 2007. Mr. Willner was also allowed to continue to vest in his award of 8,000 shares of restricted stock units also granted in September 2007. Mr. Willner’s transition occurred less than one year from Equinix establishing a European presence via its acquisition of IXEurope in September 2007. As such, an individual agreement was entered into with Mr. Willner to provide for a smooth and effective business and leadership transition as Mr. Schwartz assumed his new role as president, Equinix Europe.

22

Backaus Agreement

In July 2008, we entered into a transition services agreement with Ms. Backaus which superseded the severance benefits she was previously entitled to pursuant to her severance agreement. Pursuant to the transition services agreement, she agreed to remain employed by Equinix through February 15, 2009, although her hours were reduced, effective November 1, 2008, to 50% through December 31, 2008 and 20% thereafter, and we agreed to continue to pay Ms. Backaus her base salary (at a pro rata rate to reflect her reduction in hours) through February 15, 2009 unless she commenced full-time work with another employer, we terminated her employment for cause or she resigned. In addition, if she remained employed with Equinix through February 15, 2009, then she vested in an additional number of restricted stock awards reflecting vesting as if she remained employed through July 1, 2009. Ms. Backaus’ agreement was designed to support a transition plan that allowed for completion of a new branding campaign and other key projects initiated under her leadership, as well as the hiring of and transitioning to a new chief marketing officer, while minimizing disruption to the business.

For further discussion on our severance and change-in-control agreements, see the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” elsewhere in this proxy statement.

Benefits and Perquisites

Retirement, life, health and other welfare benefits at Equinix are the same for all eligible employees, including the named executive officers, and are designed to be aligned to our competitive market. Equinix shares the cost of health and welfare benefits with all of our eligible employees and offers an employer 401(k) match, for which all employees, including the named executive officers, are eligible. Each named executive officer, with the exception of Mr. Willner who did not participate in the 401(k) plan, received the maximum match for 2008 of $6,900.

Under his expatriate agreement, Mr. Schwartz is entitled to certain perquisites in connection with his overseas assignment as discussed above. For a complete discussion of these perquisites, see the 2008 Summary Compensation Table elsewhere in this proxy statement.

In November 2008, the Compensation Committee approved an Executive Physical Program for 2009. This program is designed to proactively manage health risks for Equinix’s executives and will have an annual expense of approximately $25,000 for all of the executives in total.

None of our named executive officers received tax gross-ups or other amounts during 2008 for the payment of taxes in connection with other compensation payments with the exception of Mr. Schwartz in connection with his overseas assignment. For further information see the 2008 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement.

Corporate Governance

Equity Grant Practices

Equinix does not have a program, plan or practice to time equity grants in coordination with the release of material, non-public information. Nor is there a program, plan or practice of awarding equity grants and setting the exercise price or fair market value based on the stock’s price on a date other than the actual grant date. Accordingly, the exercise price of stock option grants and the value of restricted stock awards will be determined using the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. However, to the extent an award is made on a date which our common stock does not have a reported closing price then the fair market value of our common stock on that date (used to set the exercise price of options and determine the value of restricted stock awards) shall mean the closing price as of the first trading day following the applicable date on which there is a reported closing price for the common stock. In 2008, all awards were made at the fair market value at the time of the award.

23

Stock Ownership/Retention

Equinix does not currently maintain any stock ownership or retention policies for executive officers because officer compensation is set within a typical market range and is primarily performance-based and high risk.

Financial Restatement

The Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy with respect to whether Equinix will make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to executive officers or others where the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. To date, Equinix has not restated any of its financial results.

Accounting and Tax Considerations

Accounting Considerations

Base salary and annual incentive compensation are expensed by Equinix when the services are rendered by the individual employees. In terms of long-term equity compensation, the fair value of stock options and restricted stock and stock unit awards, determined as of their grant date, is amortized as an expense over the awards’ vesting period.

For 2008, the total compensation expense of Equinix’s equity compensation programs under SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), requiring that all equity-based awards to employees be recognized in the income statement based upon their fair value over the requisite service period, was approximately $55 million. The SFAS 123(R) expense is considered by management in evaluating compensation levels at Equinix. In anticipation of SFAS 123(R), Equinix changed the contractual life of a standard option grant made to employees or consultants from 10 years down to seven years, which had the effect of reducing the reported compensation expense. In addition, during 2008 Equinix transitioned from granting stock options to restricted stock units to its employee base, following a similar transition made in 2005 with respect to its executive officers.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Code

Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1.0 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct for income tax purposes in any one year with respect to our chief executive officer or any of our three other most highly compensated executive officers (excluding our chief financial officer) (each referred to as a covered employee). There is an exemption to the $1.0 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements.

To qualify for the exemption from the $1.0 million deduction limitation, our stockholders approved a limitation under our Incentive Plan on the maximum number of shares of common stock for which any one participant may be granted stock options per fiscal year and, in 2007, our stockholders approved terms (the “Performance Terms”) under which long-term incentive awards for covered employees under our Incentive Plan would be performance-based for purposes of exemption from the limitations of Section 162(m). Because these limitations were adopted, any compensation deemed paid to a covered employee when he or she exercises an option under the Incentive Plan with an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date, or resulting from the vesting of performance-based restricted stock awards, will qualify as performance-based compensation and not be subject to the $1.0 million limitation. The spread between the exercise price of the option, and the fair market value of Equinix’s common stock at the time of exercise, is taken as a tax deduction by Equinix.

24

Restricted stock awards with performance-based vesting granted under the Incentive Plan prior to the approval by our stockholders of the Performance Terms, and cash awards under the annual incentive program, are subject to the $1.0 million deduction limitation when aggregated with other non-exempt compensation. To maintain flexibility in compensating our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. Although some amounts we recorded as compensation to certain named executive officers in 2008 were non-deductible by limit of Section 162(m), the limitation does not cause substantial impact to our federal income tax position. The Compensation Committee may approve compensation or changes to plans, programs or awards that may cause the compensation or awards not to comply with Section 162(m) if it determines that such action is appropriate and in our best interests.

Compensation Committee Report

Equinix’s Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Steven Eng, Chairman

Scott Kriens

Irving Lyons, III

25

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each individual who served as Equinix’s “principal executive officer,” Equinix’s “principal financial officer,” the two other highest paid executive officers whose total compensation for the year ended December 31, 2008 exceeded $100,000 and two former executive officers (our “named executive officers”).

Equinix has not entered into employment agreements with any of the named executive officers, with the exception of an expatriate agreement with Mr. Schwartz, but has entered into severance agreements pursuant to which each named executive officer is entitled to cash severance upon certain terminations of employment. Our named executive officers are also entitled to certain vesting acceleration benefits upon a change-in-control of Equinix. See the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in Control” elsewhere in this proxy statement for further discussion.

26

“Salary,” “bonus” and “non-equity incentive plan compensation” accounted for the following percentages of the total compensation of the named executive officers in 2008.

2008 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth each non-equity incentive plan award and equity award granted to Equinix’s named executive officers during fiscal year 2008.

With the exception of Guy Willner, who participated in a bonus plan for our European region, each individual listed below was granted a non-equity incentive plan award pursuant to our 2008 annual incentive plan. The amounts shown in the “target” column reflect the target payment level under the plan if Equinix achieved the EBITDA goal in its 2008 operating plan. The bonus pool was subject to reduction by 20% for every 1% below the EBITDA goal in our operating plan, and no bonuses were payable if either 2008 EBITDA or revenue were 95% or less than the operating plan target. The actual amounts paid to each officer are shown in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Mr. Ferris was also eligible for a bonus of up to 20% of his base salary based on quarterly revenue targets for the United States. 25% of the bonus was payable at the end of each quarter if the revenue target set forth in the Company’s 2008 operating plan for that quarter was met. If a quarterly revenue target was not achieved at the end of the quarter but was achieved on a cumulative basis at the end of a subsequent quarter, then the bonus for the prior quarter became payable at that time. Both the 2008 annual incentive plan and Mr. Ferris’ bonus are discussed in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” elsewhere in this proxy statement. The actual amounts paid to each officer pursuant to the 2008 annual incentive plan and Mr. Ferris’ quarterly revenue bonus are shown in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Mr. Willner participated in a bonus plan for our European region. 75% of his bonus was based on EBITDA objectives, 10% was based on specific project-related milestones and the remaining 15% was based on individual objectives. The amount shown in the “target” column below represents the amount payable if all of the objectives were achieved, which was also the maximum bonus payable under the plan. Due to Mr. Willner’s resignation in June 2008, he was not eligible for a bonus under this plan. However, we paid Mr. Willner a pro rata bonus in connection with his termination of employment, which is included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table above.

27

With the exception of Mr. Willner who received a different award described below, we granted restricted stock units to our named executive officers in January 2008 with both service and performance vesting requirements. If the Company achieved 95% of both its 2008 revenue and EBITDA goals, then 80% of the units subject to each award vest as follows provided the officer remains in service: 50% upon achievement of those goals, 25% of units on February 15, 2010 and the remaining 25% of the units on February 15, 2011. The remaining 20% of the units vest based on the same 3 year schedule but only if the Company achieved a higher EBITDA goal. As of February 12, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined that the revenue and EBITDA objectives applicable to these awards had been achieved and therefore 50% of the units vested at that time.

Mr. Willner was also granted restricted stock units in January 2008. Vesting of Mr. Willner’s award was to occur semi-annually over three years from a vesting commencement date of January 1, 2008 provided our stock appreciated to pre-determined levels. However, this award was cancelled in connection with Mr. Willner’s termination of employment in June 2008 prior to vesting in any of the units.

28

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table sets forth information regarding each unexercised option and all unvested stock and restricted stock units held by each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2008.

29

30

2008 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table shows the number of shares acquired upon exercise of options by each named executive officer during fiscal year 2008 and the number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units held by each named executive officer that vested during fiscal year 2008.

Pension Benefits

Not applicable.

Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Not applicable.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Cash Severance Agreements

We have entered into severance agreements with each of our named executive officers except Mr. Willner. However, as described below, Ms. Backaus is no longer entitled to benefits under her severance agreement.

Under their severance agreements, Messrs. Smith, Taylor and Ferris are entitled to benefits if they voluntarily resign for good reason or if Equinix terminates their employment for any reason other than cause. However, the officers may not resign for good reason for a four month period following a change-in-control. Mr. Schwartz is only entitled to benefits following a change-in-control, if Equinix terminates his employment for any reason other than cause within 12 months after a change-in-control or if he resigns for good reason during the period beginning four months after a change-in-control and ending 12 months after a change-in-control.

In the event of a qualifying termination, the severance agreements with our executive officers provide for the following benefits, provided the officer signs a general release of claims:

31

In addition, pursuant to his severance agreement, Mr. Smith’s restricted stock awards will vest pro rata with respect to the installment that would otherwise vest on the vesting date following his termination date. However, pro rata vesting of any equity award that includes performance-based vesting will only occur if the performance criteria applicable to such award have been met as of his termination date.

The severance agreements also contain non-solicitation, non-competition (during employment with Equinix), and cooperation and non-disparagement covenants.

The following definitions are used in the severance agreements with our named executive officers:

In April 2008, we entered into an expatriate agreement with Mr. Schwartz pursuant to which he agreed to relocate to the United Kingdom for approximately two years to serve as our president, Equinix Europe. Pursuant to that agreement, if we do not have a comparable position for Mr. Schwartz in the United States at the end of that assignment, Mr. Schwartz will be entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months of his annual base salary and a pro-rata bonus for the year in which the termination occurred provided he signs a release

32

of claims. If Mr. Schwartz becomes eligible for severance payments under the expatriate agreement and also under the cash severance agreement described above, then he will receive whichever is more beneficial to him. In addition, if we terminate Mr. Schwartz’s employment during the assignment for any reason other than cause or if Mr. Schwartz resigns and promptly returns to the United States, we will pay the transportation costs to bring Mr. Schwartz, his family and his household goods back to the United States. During the duration of Mr. Schwartz’s assignment, we agreed to provide benefits including a $35,920 annual cost of living adjustment, company-provided housing, an automobile allowance, an allowance to pay for the education of his dependents and a tax equalization provision to the extent his taxes in the United Kingdom exceed the taxes he would have paid in the United States.

In July 2008, we entered into a transition services agreement with Ms. Backaus which supersedes the severance benefits she was previously entitled to pursuant to her severance agreement. Pursuant to the transition services agreement, she agreed to remain employed by Equinix through February 15, 2009, although her hours were reduced, effective November 1, 2008, to 50% through December 31, 2008 and 20% thereafter, and we agreed to continue to pay Ms. Backaus her base salary (at a pro rata rate to reflect her reduction in hours) through February 15, 2009 unless she commenced full-time work with another employer, we terminated her employment for cause or she resigned. In addition, if she remained employed with Equinix through February 15, 2009, then she was entitled to vesting of an additional number of restricted stock awards as if she remained employed through July 1, 2009.

In April 2008, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Willner pursuant to which his employment terminated on June 1, 2008, although he continued to serve on the board of our subsidiary Equinix Europe. Pursuant to that agreement, Mr. Willner is entitled to continued coverage in our European medical plan through the earlier of March 1, 2009 or the date he no longer serves on the board of Equinix Europe, a pro rata 2008 bonus and full vesting of 23,218 unvested RSUs. Mr. Willner may vest in an additional 8,000 unvested RSUs if the performance criteria applicable to that award are achieved. In addition, we paid Mr. Willner’s legal fees incurred in connection with his separation agreement.

The following table estimates the amount of compensation and benefits payable to each of our named executive officers under the severance agreements described above as if their employment terminated on December 31, 2008, the last business day of the last fiscal year (and assumes no change-in-control). In the case of Ms. Backaus and Mr. Willner, severance benefits are calculated based on the transition services and separation agreements described above.

33

Equity Vesting Acceleration

Pursuant to our Incentive Plan and 2001 Supplemental Stock Plan, upon a change-in-control of Equinix, each outstanding option, all shares of restricted stock and all restricted stock units will generally become fully vested unless the surviving corporation assumes the option or award or replaces it with a comparable award. All equity awards granted prior to February 2008 also provide that if they are assumed or replaced in the transaction and do not otherwise accelerate at that time, they will become fully vested if the holder is subject to an involuntary termination within 18 months following the change-in-control. In February 2008, this provision was removed from the plans. In addition, options and restricted shares granted to our named executive officers and other executive officers prior to 2008 provide for an additional 12 months of vesting upon a change-in-control of Equinix, regardless of whether any applicable stock price appreciation targets have been obtained.

A “change-in-control” includes:

“Misconduct” means the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty, any unauthorized use or disclosure by such person of confidential information or trade secrets of Equinix, or any other intentional misconduct by such person adversely affecting the business or affairs of Equinix in a material manner.

The following table describes the potential vesting acceleration for each named executive officer in connection with a change-in-control or termination of employment following a change-in-control. We have

34

assumed for this purpose that both the change-in-control and termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008, the last business day of the last fiscal year. The closing price of Equinix’s common stock on December 31, 2008 was $53.19, which was used as the value of Equinix’s common stock in the change-in-control.

In the case of stock options, the value of the vesting acceleration was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested option shares by the difference between the closing price of Equinix’s common stock on December 31, 2008 and the exercise price for such unvested option shares.

In the case of restricted shares and restricted stock units, the value of the vesting acceleration was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested restricted shares or restricted stock units by the closing price of Equinix’s stock on that date.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2008 with respect to shares of our common stock issuable under our existing equity compensation plans:

35

The following equity compensation plan that was in effect as of December 31, 2008 was adopted without the approval of our security holders:

The Equinix, Inc. 2001 Supplemental Stock Plan (the “2001 Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors on September 26, 2001. We have reserved 1,493,961 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2001 Plan, under which nonstatutory stock options and restricted shares may be granted to non-executive officer employees and consultants of ours or any parent or subsidiary corporation. Options granted under the 2001 Plan must have an exercise price equal to no less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant; however, as of December 31, 2008, all options granted under the 2001 Plan have an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, options to purchase 613,366 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2001 Plan, 257,112 shares remained available for future grants, and options covering 623,483 shares had been exercised. Pursuant the 2001 Plan, upon a change-in-control of Equinix, each outstanding option and all shares of restricted stock will generally become fully vested unless the surviving corporation assumes the option or award or replaces it with a comparable award. Any options or shares of restricted stock, granted prior to February 2008, which are assumed or replaced in the transaction and do not otherwise accelerate at that time will become fully vested if the holder is subject to an involuntary termination within 18 months following the change-in-control. The Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 2001 Plan at any time, and the 2001 Plan will continue in effect indefinitely unless the Board of Director decides to terminate the plan earlier.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Transactions with Affiliates of STT Communications

A significant amount of Equinix’s Asia-Pacific revenues are generated in Singapore and a significant portion of the business in Singapore is transacted with entities affiliated with STT Communications, the parent company of a stockholder who held greater than 10% of our outstanding common stock until November 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008, sales to entities affiliated with STT Communications totaled $4,238,000 and purchases of goods and services from entities affiliated with STT Communications totaled $425,000.

Transactions with StarHub Ltd.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, sales to entities affiliated with StarHub Ltd., an entity affiliated with STT Communications, totaled $184,000 and purchases from entities affiliated with StarHub Ltd. totaled $436,000. One of our directors, Steven Clontz, is the president and chief executive officer of StarHub Ltd.

Transactions with Juniper Networks, Inc.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, purchases from Juniper Networks totaled $643,562. One of our directors, Scott Kriens, served as chief executive officer of Juniper Networks until September 2008.

Transactions with Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, sales to Goldman Sachs totaled $11,504,000. Goldman Sachs Asset Management LP is a holder of greater than 10% of our outstanding common stock.

Compensation of Peter Van Camp

For the year ended December 31, 2008, Peter Van Camp earned $63,000 in salary as compensation for his service as Equinix’s executive chair. In addition, the dollar amount recognized by Equinix for financial statement reporting purposes for 2008 from Mr. Van Camp’s outstanding equity awards, in accordance with SFAS 123(R), was $48,906 with respect to his outstanding options and $498,182 with respect to his outstanding stock awards.

36

Approval of Related Transactions

Per its written charter, Equinix’s Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions in accordance with the rules of the NASDAQ National Market. Related parties include any of our directors or executive officers, our greater than 5% stockholders, and their immediate family members.

We review related party transactions due to the potential for a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s private interest interferes, or appears to interfere, with our interests. To identify related party transactions, each year we require our directors and executive officers to complete a questionnaire identifying any transactions with us in which the executive officer or director or their family members have an interest. We seek updates to this information from our directors and executive officers on a quarterly basis. We also ask our directors to update their list of companies they are affiliated with on a quarterly basis to help us identify related party transactions.

Finally, our Code of Business Conduct establishes corporate standards of behavior for all our employees, officers, and directors and sets our expectations of contractors and agents. Our Code of Business Conduct seeks to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, and encourages the reporting of illegal or unethical behavior. Waivers of the Code of Business Conduct may be granted by Equinix’s chief executive officer or compliance officer, provided that waivers for executive officers or directors may only be granted by the Board of Directors or by one of its committees.

The Audit Committee Charter and the Code of Business Conduct are available on the corporate governance section of Equinix’s website at www.equinix.com.

37

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Equinix is asking the stockholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Equinix’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter has been approved.

If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Board of Directors will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Board of Directors in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of Equinix and its stockholders.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited Equinix’s financial statements since 2000. Its representatives are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2