XRM-2012.12.31-10K

10-K 1 xrm-20121231x10k.htm 10-K XRM-2012.12.31-10K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012



£	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-32498

Xerium Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




DELAWARE		42-1558674
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8537 Six Forks Road, Suite 300

Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

(Address of principal executive offices)

(919) 526-1400

Registrant’s telephone number (including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:




Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share		New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	£		Accelerated filer	£
Non-accelerated filer	x	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 29, 2012, the last business day in the second fiscal quarter, was approximately $30,819,161. There were 15,309,717 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of March 1, 2013.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ý No ¨

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated by reference in Part III to the extent described therein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS




		PAGE
PART I.
ITEM 1.	Business	3
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	11
ITEM 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	22
ITEM 2.	Properties	22
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	22
ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

PART II.
ITEM 5.	Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
ITEM 6.	Selected Financial Data	24
ITEM 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
ITEM 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
ITEM 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	42
ITEM 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	42
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures	43
ITEM 9B.	Other Information	44

PART III.
ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	44
ITEM 11.	Executive Compensation	45
ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	45
ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	45
ITEM 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	45

PART IV.
ITEM 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	45
SIGNATURES		45

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF

THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to the safe harbor created by that Act. These statements relate to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond our control and that could materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Factors that could materially affect our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements include the following items:


•	we are subject to the risk of a weaker global economy that influences the paper industry as well as local economic conditions in the areas around the world where we conduct business;


•	structural shifts in the demand for paper, for instance the shift away from newsprint, printing and writing paper in favor of digital media, may adversely impact our financial results;


•	our strategy to lower our costs in response to market changes in the paper industry by reorganizing and restructuring our operations will require us to incur significant costs and may not provide the savings and results we anticipate;


•	our strategies and plans, including, but not limited to, those relating to developing and successfully marketing new products, enhancing our operational efficiencies and reducing costs, may not result in the anticipated benefits;


•	our financial results could be adversely affected by fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates;


•	our manufacturing facilities may be required to quickly increase or decrease production capacity, which could negatively affect our production, customer order lead time, product quality, labor relations or gross margin;


•	we may not be successful in developing and marketing new technologies or in competing against new technologies developed by competitors;


•	variations in demand for our products, including our new products, could negatively affect our net sales and profitability;


•	we are subject to fluctuations in the price of our component supply costs;


•	due to our high degree of leverage and significant debt service obligations, we need to generate substantial operating cash flow to fund growth and unexpected cash needs;


•	our credit facility contains restrictive covenants, such as the covenants requiring compliance with minimum interest coverage and maximum leverage ratios, which become more restrictive over time, that may require us to increasingly improve our performance over time to remain compliant;


•	we are subject to the risk of terrorist attacks or an outbreak or escalation of any insurrection or armed conflict involving the United States or any other country in which we conduct business, or any other domestic or international calamity, including natural disasters;


•	we are subject to the impact of changes in the policies, laws, regulations and practices of the United States and any foreign country in which we operate or conduct business, including changes regarding taxes and the repatriation of earnings; and


•	anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us.

Other factors that could materially affect our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements can be found in our “Risk Factors” section in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from what we project. Any forward-looking statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties, and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy, and liquidity. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

All references in this Annual Report to “Xerium”, “the Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” means Xerium Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

PART I



ITEM 1.	BUSINESS

General

We are a leading global manufacturer and supplier of two types of consumable products used primarily in the production of paper—clothing and roll covers. We market our products through the following industry-recognized brands:




Brand	Product Category	Geographic Region
Huyck Wangner	Clothing	Worldwide other than North America
Weavexx	Clothing	North America
Stowe Woodward	Roll Covers & Spreader Rolls	Worldwide
Mount Hope	Spreader Rolls	Worldwide
Robec	Spreader Rolls	Europe
Xibe	Roll Covers	China

We have an extensive global footprint of 30 manufacturing facilities in 13 countries, strategically located in the major paper-producing regions of North America, Europe, South America and Asia-Pacific, and have approximately 3,279 employees worldwide. We market our products, primarily using our direct sales force, to the paper industry’s leading producers. In 2012, we generated net sales of $538.7 million. At December 31, 2012 our backlog approximated $174.0 million and is defined as orders to ship within one year.

Company Overview

Our clothing and roll cover products are installed on pulp and paper-making machines and play key roles in the process by which raw materials are converted into finished paper. A fundamental characteristic of our products is that they are consumed in the paper production process and must be regularly replaced. This positions us to make recurring sales to our customers, and accordingly the number of paper machines in operation throughout the world and the amount of paper, pulp and board produced globally each year are primary drivers of the demand for our products. In addition, our products are also installed in other industrial applications such as nonwoven and fiber cement machines.

Paper-making machines utilize different processes and have different requirements depending on the design of the machine, the raw materials used, the type of paper being made and the preferences of individual production managers. We employ our broad portfolio of patented and proprietary product and manufacturing technologies, as well as our extensive industry experience, to provide our customers with tailored solutions designed to optimize the performance of their equipment and dramatically reduce the costs of their operations. We systematically track and report the impact of these customized solutions to our customers through our ValueResults program which quantifies the optimization process on their machines.

Our clothing products are highly engineered synthetic textile belts that transport and filter paper as it is processed in a paper-making machine. Clothing plays a significant role in the forming, pressing and drying stages of paper production. Our clothing segment represented 66% of our net sales for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Roll cover products cover the rolls on a paper-making machine, which are the large steel cylinders over which clothing is mounted and between which the paper travels as it is processed. Our roll covers provide a surface with the mechanical properties necessary to process the paper in a cost-effective manner that delivers the sheet qualities desired by the paper producer. We currently use several hundred chemical compounds in our roll cover manufacturing process. Our roll cover segment represented 34% of our net sales for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Our products are in constant contact with the paper during the manufacturing process. As a result, our products have a significant effect on paper quality and the ability of a paper producer to differentiate its products, two factors which are increasingly important to paper producers. In addition, while clothing and roll covers represent only approximately 3%, on average, of a paper producer’s production costs, they can help a paper producer improve productivity and reduce overall costs. Our clothing and roll covers facilitate the paper producer’s use of less expensive raw materials (including recycled fiber), their ability to run paper-making machines faster and with fewer interruptions, and their ability to decrease the amount of energy required in the expensive drying portion of the paper-making process. We have found that, in certain cases, our products and services provide paper producers with cost savings that substantially offset the costs of such products and services.

We estimate that there are approximately 7,000 paper-making machines worldwide, all of which require a regular supply of clothing and roll covers. Clothing and roll covers must be replaced regularly to sustain high quality paper output and operate efficiently. Roll covers also require regular refurbishment, a service that we provide to our customers. Paper producers typically replace clothing several times per year, replace roll covers every two to five years and refurbish roll covers several times between each replacement.

We have a reputation for technological innovation in the paper-making industry. In our clothing segment, in recent years we have focused our research and development efforts on higher value-added, technologically advanced products, such as forming fabrics and press felts, which offer paper producers greater potential for differentiating their products through quality improvements and increasing their operating efficiency. We pioneered a number of technologies that have become industry standards, including in our clothing business, synthetic forming fabrics (which replaced bronze wire technology), double-layer forming fabrics, laminated press felts and, most recently, triple-layer forming fabrics.

In our roll covers segment, we have introduced a number of innovations to our roll cover and spreader roll products in recent years, including (1) the SmartRoll, the first continuous pressure sensing paper machine roll that enables the papermaker to maximize performance by knowing the pressure of the paper machine while the machine is running; (2) composite calender roll covers that use nanoparticle technology to improve roll cover durability and paper gloss; and (3) covers that use an improved polyurethane to increase abrasion and moisture resistance as well as responsiveness and stability.

Our portfolio of patented and proprietary product and manufacturing technologies differentiates our product offerings from others in the market and allows us to deliver high value products and services to our customers. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately 270 issued patents and approximately 100 pending patent applications. Our patents and patent applications cover approximately 60 different inventions. We currently license certain of our patents and technologies to some of our competitors, which we believe helps further demonstrate our technological leadership in the industry. We believe that the technological sophistication of our products and the capital-intensive nature of our business present significant challenges to any potential new competitors in our field.

Our business was organized in 1999 in connection with the acquisition of the paper technology group of Invensys plc. We completed our initial public offering on May 19, 2005.

Chapter 11 Filing, Emergence and Plan of Reorganization

On March 30, 2010, we and certain of our subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On May 12, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the plan of reorganization (“the Plan”). On May 25, 2010, the Plan became effective and we and our subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Chapter 11 Filing, Emergence and Plan of Reorganization” for additional information regarding our Chapter 11 proceedings.

Recent Developments

Global Economic Environment

Our operations are highly dependent upon the pulp and paper production industry and the degree to which the paper industry is affected by global economic conditions and the availability of credit.

Beginning in 2008 and continuing through most of 2009, the global paper industry experienced a sharp reduction in production levels, caused by the general slowdown in economic activity and related paper consumption during the same period and the paper manufacturers’ reduction of excessive inventories. The slowdown of production was across most grades of paper production, but most notably in packaging and newsprint grades. For packaging grades, demand was directly related to broad manufacturing and transportation activity reduction, while newsprint demand has been declining over a number of years due to the greater prevalence of electronic media and was exacerbated during the recession by a reduction in print advertising. One of the results of this recession driven reduction in demand for paper products was that the paper manufacturers dramatically and quickly reduced production through curtailments of machines and complete mill shutdowns. These curtailments, which began in late 2008, served to reduce inventories and match output with demand. By early 2010, most mills and equipment not permanently shuttered had resumed production.

In the first half of 2011, global paper and board production continued the recovery that began in 2010, particularly in developing countries. As international shipments of manufactured goods increased, containerboard production recovered particularly strongly, contributing over 50% of the total global improvement. The paper and board production recovery stalled beginning in the second half of 2011 and remained flat throughout 2012, particularly in Europe and South America.

Business Strategy

The primary components of our business strategy are:

•

Reduce cost structure and improve profitability - The paper industry has been going through a transition in paper grades, such as printing and writing and newsprint as technology has reduced demand for printed materials, particularly in developed markets. We are committed to continually evaluating shifting market requirements to ensure that our production capacity and cost structure are optimized to reflect changing market dynamics.

•

Continue to expand in Asia - The growth in developing markets, most notably China, is driving paper production globally. By 2017, it is estimated that paper production in Asia will grow 25%, increasing to 50% of the total worldwide paper production. In order to increase our profitability and reduce lead times in Asia, we are committed to shifting or developing production capabilities to service this expanding market.

•

Accelerate growth activities in non paper markets - Our paper machine clothing and roll cover products are used in the production process of other industries and provide us with growth opportunities outside of the paper industry. We are committed to evaluating and addressing these market opportunities. We believe we can grow the non paper portion of our business to improve our overall profitability.


•	Develop a strong management team to drive execution of strategy and improved performance - We are committed to the retention and development of our management team and the addition of functional leadership where necessary to enable us to develop and execute strategies necessary to improve the performance of the business.

Products

We operate through two principal business segments, clothing and roll covers. Our clothing segment products include various types of industrial textiles used on paper-making machines and other industrial applications. Through our roll covers segment, we manufacture various types of roll covers, refurbish previously installed roll covers, provide mechanical services for the internal mechanisms of rolls used on paper-making machines and manufacture spreader rolls. For additional financial information about our clothing and roll covers segments, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 12 "Business Segment Information" to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.

Clothing Products

Our clothing segment products are large, highly engineered synthetic textile belts that transport paper as it is processed in a paper-making machine from paper stock into finished paper. Clothing products must be tailored to each machine because all paper-making machines have different physical configurations and operating parameters. Clothing generally ranges in size from approximately 7 feet to over 30 feet wide and 24 feet to more than 460 feet long and operates on paper-making machines that run at speeds up to 7,500 feet per minute.

We manufacture three general types of clothing products used on paper-making machines—forming fabrics, press felts and dryer fabrics—each of which is located in a different section of a machine. Forming fabrics and press felts are typically replaced several times a year, but replacement frequency varies significantly by the grade of paper being produced, the manner in which the paper-making machine is operated and the quality of raw materials used in the paper stock. Dryer fabrics are replaced less frequently, with replacement typically taking place approximately once per year.

Forming fabrics. Forming fabrics are used at the beginning of paper-making machines, where highly diluted paper stock is deposited on the forming fabric while the fabric is traveling at a very high speed. Forming fabrics allow water to drain from the paper stock, creating an initial wet sheet. Forming fabrics must be sufficiently porous to allow water to drain evenly and quickly, yet tight enough to retain and align the fiber and other materials that form the sheet of paper. They must also be strong enough to withstand high mechanical stresses. Forming fabrics are custom-manufactured in single, double, and triple layer designs in a variety of meshes to suit particular machines and paper grades. Customers are increasingly demanding the higher-priced triple layer designs that remove more moisture and produce higher quality paper. In 2012, forming fabrics accounted for approximately 39% of net sales in our clothing segment.

Press felts. Press felts are used to carry the paper sheet through a series of press rolls that mechanically press water from the sheet under high pressure. Press felts are designed to maximize water removal, which reduces the amount of water that must be removed during the expensive energy-intensive drying section of the production process. Press felts must maximize

water removal while maintaining the orientation of the fibers and the consistency of the thickness of the paper, without removing chemicals or fillers from the paper.

Press felts differ from forming fabrics and dryer fabrics due to the addition of several layers of staple fiber that are needled into the fabric base. The staple fiber provides a smooth surface to meet the wet sheet of paper and creates a wicking effect to remove water from the paper sheet as it is pressed under high pressure between press rolls. Press felts are manufactured in a variety of designs, including lightweight single layer felts, multi-layer laminated endless felts and seamed felts that allow for reduced installation times. In 2012, press felts accounted for approximately 43% of net sales in our clothing segment.

Dryer fabrics. Dryer fabrics are used to transport the paper sheet through the drying section of paper-making machines, where high temperatures from large, steam-heated dryer cylinders evaporate the remaining moisture from the paper sheet. Dryer fabrics, which are less technically advanced than forming fabrics or press felts, are woven from heat-resistant yarns with a coarser mesh than forming fabrics. In 2012, dryer fabrics accounted for approximately 6% of net sales in our clothing segment.

Industrials and Other. We manufacture other fabrics used in other industrial applications, such as pulp, non-woven textiles, fiber cement, tannery sludge dewatering and textiles manufacturing. In 2012, net sales for such industrial applications accounted for 12% of net sales in our clothing segment. We also manufacture auto-joining equipment used in clothing production. Net sales of auto-joining equipment accounted for less than 1% of net sales in our clothing segment in 2012.

New Clothing Products. In recent years, we have focused our research and development efforts on higher value-added, technologically advanced products, such as forming fabrics and press felts, which offer paper producers the greatest potential for differentiating their products through quality improvements and for increasing their operating efficiency. Our research and development efforts have resulted in several innovative new forming fabric and press felt products, including a number of high performance products, such as triple layer forming fabrics, for use on high performance paper-making machines.

Roll Covers and Services

In our roll covers segment, the majority of our sales are generated through the replacement and refurbishment of roll covers and spreader rolls, the manufacturing of new spreader rolls and we also provide general mechanical maintenance and repair services for the internal mechanisms of rolls.

Roll covers. We manufacture, refurbish and replace covers of all types of roll applications used in paper-making machines, such as press section rolls including suction rolls, lump breaker rolls, coater rolls, sizing rolls, calendar rolls and all purpose conveying rolls. There can be up to 200 such rolls in a typical paper-making machine. These metal rolls, which can be up to 39 feet long, 6 feet in diameter and weigh 500 to 140,000 pounds, are covered with an exterior layer of rubber, polyurethane, composite or ceramic, each of which is designed for use in a particular phase of the paper-making process. Roll covers operate in temperatures up to 400 degrees Fahrenheit, under pressures up to 12,000 pounds per square inch and at speeds up to 10,000 feet per minute. Roll covers are typically replaced every two to five years.

Roll cover replacement is performed at the manufacturing facility of the supplier, such as Xerium, which necessitates removing the roll from the paper-making machine, transporting it to the supplier’s site and using a spare roll in the interim. In general, each roll on a paper-making machine is unique due to its dimensions, specific design and cover material, and generally not interchangeable with other rolls. Because of their large size, paper producers generally maintain only one spare roll for each position on a paper-making machine. It is important that the roll cover replacement be completed quickly, because damage or a malfunction of the spare roll could render the paper-making machine inoperable.

Due to the large size and weight of a roll, transportation to and from a supplier’s site can be costly and is occasionally subject to regulations on road use that restrict available routes and times of travel, and that may require safety escorts. Round-trip transcontinental travel can take several weeks and intercontinental travel is rare. We offer an extensive network of manufacturing facilities worldwide, often in close proximity to our customers, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage.

Roll covers accounted for approximately 55% of our total net sales in our roll covers segment in 2012.

Services. Roll covers are typically refurbished several times over the two to five years they are in service before needing to be replaced. Refurbishment typically includes the regrinding of the roll cover to standard specifications and inspecting the bearings and other mechanical components of the roll. As with roll cover replacement, refurbishment is performed at the supplier’s manufacturing facility. Similar to the paper producer’s selection of a roll cover supplier, the selection of a refurbishment provider is influenced by the time and expense of transporting a roll cover.

We offer a wide range of mechanical maintenance and repair services for the internal mechanisms of rolls. Paper producers are increasingly finding it economical to have the company that refurbishes or replaces a roll cover also perform work on the internal roll mechanisms at the same time, which avoids having multiple suppliers and incurring additional time and transportation charges. We have begun performing such services to meet the demands of our customers and attempt to gain a competitive advantage. As of December 31, 2012, we provide major mechanical services at ten locations around the world. Roll cover refurbishment services and mechanical services accounted for approximately 26% of our total net sales in our roll covers segment in 2012.

Spreader rolls. We manufacture and repair spreader rolls, which are small-diameter curved rolls used throughout a paper-making machine to stretch, smooth and remove wrinkles from the paper and clothing. There are approximately five to seven spreader rolls in a typical paper-making machine. Spreader rolls and related services accounted for approximately 19% of our total net sales in our roll covers segment in 2012.

New Roll Products. We have introduced a number of innovations to our roll cover and spreader roll products in recent years, including composite calendar roll covers that use nanoparticle technology to improve roll cover durability and paper gloss, as well as covers that use an improved polyurethane to increase abrasion and moisture resistance as well as responsiveness and stability. We are evaluating new products, which will use different materials and utilize different sales channels and provide enhancements to our existing product line. In late 2008, we introduced SmartRoll, the first continuous pressure sensing paper machine roll. SmartRoll enables the paper maker to maximize performance by qualitatively measuring the operating pressures of the paper machine while the machine is running. As of December 31, 2012, customers have ordered 307 SmartRoll units and a large portion of those are already operational, confirming market acceptance.

In 2012, paper producers accounted for approximately 81% of net sales in our roll covers segment, and paper-making machine manufacturers accounted for approximately 7% of net sales. Net sales for use in other industrial applications, including steel, plastics, leather and textiles manufacturing, accounted for the remaining 12% of our net sales in our roll covers segment.

Customers

We supply leading paper producers worldwide. Our top ten customers accounted for 23.2% of net sales in 2012 and individually, no customer accounted for more than 6% of 2012 net sales. In 2012, 38.% of our net sales were generated in North America, 31% in Europe, 9% in South America, 20% in Asia-Pacific and 2% in the rest of the world. See Note 12 "Business Segment Information" to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for geographic information related to net sales and long-lived assets. Due to competitive market forces, we offer our customers payment terms similar to those offered by our competitors. Also, agreements with certain customers require us to maintain modest amounts of finished clothing inventory to assure those customers of supply continuity. We do not maintain finished rolls inventories.

Competition

Our largest competitors are Albany International Corp. (a publicly-owned U.S. company), which supplies clothing products, Voith AG (a privately-owned German company) and Metso Corporation (a publicly-owned Finnish company), both of which supply both clothing and roll products. Voith and Metso are also the leading manufacturers of paper-making machines. In addition, we also face competition from smaller regional suppliers.

We compete primarily based on the value, price and production lead times of our products. Competition with respect to both clothing and roll covers, particularly as it relates to our technologically advanced forming fabrics, press felts and roll covers, is based primarily on the value that the products deliver to the paper producer through the ability of such products to reduce production costs and improve paper quality. Also because our customers operate continuously, we aim to offer competitive delivery schedules from customer order to placement in their machines.

Competition in the clothing and roll covers market is also based on a supplier’s ability to deliver engineering and technical services. Many paper producers have been reducing their in-house engineering and technical staff and increasingly expect their suppliers to provide such services. While smaller suppliers often lack the resources necessary to invest in and provide this level of engineering and technical service, we have made investments in order to provide the following services to the paper producers: specialist advice and resident engineers, installation support, on-call “trouble-shooting” and performance monitoring and analysis of paper-making machines.

In the roll covers market, competition is also based on a supplier’s proximity to the paper producer’s facilities, which affects the transportation time and expense associated with refurbishing or replacing a roll cover, and on the supplier’s ability to provide mechanical services to a roll’s internal mechanisms while the roll cover is being refurbished or replaced. We offer an extensive network of facilities throughout the world and provide mechanical services at the majority of our locations.

Research and Development

Our continuing ability to deliver value depends on developing product innovations. As we create new and improved products we are often able to obtain patent protection for our innovations, which is indicative of our technical capabilities and creativity. Although we do not consider any single patent to be material to our business, we believe that, in the aggregate, our patents and other intellectual property provide us with a competitive advantage. At December 31, 2012, we have approximately 270 domestic and foreign patents outstanding and approximately 100 pending patent applications. Our patents and patent applications cover approximately 60 different inventions. Some of our competitors license our technology from us in exchange for royalty payments, although such licensing does not represent a material amount of our business. Research and development expenses totaled $11.7 million, $12.1 million and $11.4 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were approximately 2.2% of our net sales in 2012 and 2.1% of our net sales in 2011 and 2010.

Production

Clothing Production Process

The following diagram represents the clothing production process.

The clothing production process begins with the spinning of synthetic fiber threads to produce yarn, which is then twisted in preparation for the manufacturing of clothing. Yarn, which is sometimes purchased as a raw material, is then wound on large spools prior to installation on the loom. The yarn is drawn through needles in preparation for weaving.

With the yarn prepared for weaving, a weave pattern can be installed in the loom controller. The nature of the weave pattern is critical to how the clothing performs in the paper-making process. The yarn is then woven to the desired length.

Technological advancements have resulted in weaving becoming an almost entirely automated process. Following weaving of a forming or dryer fabric, the two ends are permanently joined to form a continuous loop of clothing. Although significant automation has occurred in the joining process, it remains the most labor intensive of the clothing production process.

Press felts are woven in a continuous loop and undergo a process that is not necessary for forming and dryer fabrics. An additional layer of fibers is added to the outside surface with the use of an advanced needling machine, such that a very smooth felt surface is created.

All clothing then undergoes heat setting and chemical treating. Heat setting tightens the clothing giving it the necessary mechanical properties for the paper-making process. Finally, the clothing is meticulously inspected prior to being shipped to the customer.

The clothing production process is capital intensive and requires a variety of equipment, including warping equipment, weaving looms, heat set equipment, joining equipment, needle looms and finishing machines.

Roll Cover Production Process

The following diagram represents the roll covering production process.

The covering on the rolls used in the paper-making process wear over time and must be periodically replaced for the roll to function properly. Rolls are removed from the paper-making machine and taken to an offsite facility for re-covering. During this time, a spare roll is placed in the machine to enable continuous operations.

The first step of the roll covering process is the removal of the old cover. A lathe and belt grinder are used to remove the old cover, exposing the roll shell. The shell is cleaned with a pressure washer and blasted with solid particles to increase the shell’s surface area for bonding of the new cover. Following the blasting process, the shell is ready to be re-covered.

The shell is then coated with proprietary bonding agents that affix the new roll cover to the shell. Each type of cover material is applied with a different process. Rubber and composite covers are extruded in a slow spinning lathe. Polyurethane covers are typically cast on the core using a mold, and ceramic covering is expelled onto the shell at high pressure.

Following application of the core material, the cover undergoes a curing process. Rubber covers are cured for 12 to 28 hours in vulcanizers under high temperature and pressure, whereas polyurethane and composite materials are cured in a hot air oven. After curing, the roll cover is ground with belts and grinding stones. A proprietary pattern of holes and grooves is then drilled into the cover to aid in water removal. Finally, the roll is balanced for proper spinning motion and meticulously checked for quality before being returned to the customer.

The roll cover production process is capital intensive and requires a variety of equipment, including lathes, belt grinders, polyurethane casting molds (for polyurethane roll covers), extruders, mix stations, vulcanizers, ovens and balancing equipment.

Raw Materials

Primary raw materials used in our paper machine clothing production are synthetic yarns and fibers. The primary raw materials used in our roll cover products are natural and synthetic rubber, epoxy resins and polyurethane. A number of suppliers provide the materials used in our product lines, so availability has not posed a significant concern, however, because both the clothing and certain roll cover materials are petroleum-based, their prices are subject to changes in the price of petroleum. Natural rubber prices tend to be influenced directly by the health of the automotive industry and have seen substantial increases as the industry recovered in 2011. In 2012 raw material prices stabilized and in some cases partially recovered.

Environmental

We believe that any liability in excess of amounts provided in Note 9 "Commitments and Contingencies" to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements which may result from the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or cash flow.

Employees

As of December 31, 2012 we had 3,279 employees worldwide, of which 76% were manufacturing employees. As of December 31, 2012, 2,260 or 69% of our employees are members of labor unions, trade unions, employee associations or workers councils. We believe that we have good relations with our employees and the various groups that represent our employees.

Our Corporate Information

We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements, and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

We maintain a website at www.xerium.com to provide information to the general public and our shareholders on our products and services, along with general information on Xerium. We make our periodic and current reports available, free of charge, on our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our corporate code of business conduct and ethics, our corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of each of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of our board of directors are also made available, free of charge, on our website. Our corporate code of business conduct and ethics, which includes our code of ethics, and related waivers (if any) are posted on our website and we intend to post on our website and (if required) file on Form 8-K all disclosures required by applicable law or the rules of the SEC concerning any amendment to, or waiver from, our code of ethics. Copies of these documents may be obtained, free of charge, by writing Investor Relations, Xerium Technologies, Inc., 8537 Six Forks Road, Suite 300, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615, or telephoning us at 919-526-1444.



ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

Our business, results of operations and financial condition, and an investment in our securities, are subject to various risks. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below in conjunction with the other information in this Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. If any of the following risks or other risks which have not been identified or which we may believe are immaterial or unlikely, actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. This could cause the value of our securities to decline and holders could lose part or all of their investment. This section does not describe all risks applicable to us, our business or industry, and it is intended only as a summary of certain material factors.

Risks Relating to Our Business and the Industry

Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions could reduce our net sales and profitability and as a result, our operating results may be adversely affected.

End-user demand for paper heavily influences the volume of paper produced on a worldwide basis and, ultimately, customer demand for our products. Although demand has improved since the financial crisis and recession that began in 2008, the global macroeconomic environment remains unstable. The slow recovery from the recession and the possible impact of significant government spending cuts or a future failure to raise the “debt ceiling” in the U.S., as well as the impact of the sovereign debt crisis and resulting austerity measures in Europe, has contributed to this instability and may continue to contribute to economic uncertainty for the foreseeable future. This uncertainty could have a negative and adverse impact on the end-users of paper and the companies with which we do business, which in turn could reduce the volume of demand for our products, adversely affecting our business.

For instance, while it appears concerns of imminent solvency events across Europe have abated, much uncertainty remains regarding the ability of the Eurozone to generate sustainable economic growth in the face of the substantial austerity measures imposed by European governments to address structural deficits. The austerity measures and the uncertainty regarding growth continue to have a negative impact on the European economy. A prolonged downturn resulting from these conditions could disrupt the current U.S. recovery and weaken global trade, hamper key emerging markets such as China and India, and result in another global recession with reduced demand and lower prices for paper.

Among the various impacts stemming from these potential economic conditions, the following represent the most material to our operations and industry:


•	regional economic recession which could spread globally, significantly impacting the demand for paper and, consequently, our products;


•	severe tightening or shut down of credit markets resulting in a deterioration of our customers’ credit quality or access to cash lowering the realization rate on our accounts receivable; and


•	substantial depreciation of the foreign currencies that we use in our business against our reporting currency, the U.S. Dollar, resulting in increased currency translation risk.

The economic developments mentioned above could have a significant negative impact on our earnings, cash flows, access to capital, liquidity and financial position.

A continued structural downturn in the paper industry could adversely affect our net sales and profitability.

Because demand for our products has been driven primarily by the volume of paper produced on a worldwide basis, trends that affect the production level of the paper industry, such as declining demand for newsprint and printing and writing paper due to increased adoption of digital media, will impact our business and financial results.

The profitability of paper producers has historically been highly cyclical due to wide swings in the price of paper, driven to a high degree by the oversupply of paper during periods when paper producers have more aggregate capacity than the market requires. In response to significant changes in the sector, particularly in late 2008 and 2009, and other technological shifts affecting paper consumption, paper producers have continually sought to improve the balance between the supply of and demand for paper. As part of these efforts, they have permanently shut down many paper-making machines or entire manufacturing facilities. Should papermakers continue to experience low levels of profitability, we would expect that further consolidation among papermakers, reducing the number of paper producers, and shutdowns of paper-making machines or facilities could occur, particularly in Europe and North America, until there is a better balance between supply and demand for paper and the profit levels of paper producers improve.

Global paper production growth that does occur could be moderated by the level of industry consolidation and paper-machine shutdown activity that appears to be an underlying global trend, except in Asia. In 2012, substantial declines in European paper production outweighed any paper production growth we saw in other regions. We have continued to see the trend that paper producers are focusing on cost reduction strategies and, as a result, are extending the life of roll covers and clothing products through additional maintenance cycles before replacing them. A continued structural downturn in the paper industry, either globally or in a particular region, could cause our paper manufacturing customers to reduce production, cease operations or declare bankruptcy, each of which would adversely affect our net sales and profitability.

We have announced several restructuring actions aimed at realigning our cost structure with market demand in the paper industry and anticipate pursuing further restructuring activities in the future, all of which have and will require significant expenditures and may not be successful.

During 2012, we announced various operational restructuring measures in response to changed market conditions in the paper industry triggered by the structural realignment between supply of and demand for paper. For example, we have announced the termination of sales agency relationships in Europe, the closure of our French rolls plant, the closure of a clothing production line in Argentina, workforce reductions in Germany, and the proposed closures of our Charlotte spreader roll facility and our clothing facility in Spain. We anticipate pursuing additional cost reduction programs in the future.

In connection with these cost reduction measures and with any future plant closures or workforce reductions, delays or failures in the transition of production from a closed facility to our other facilities or the rate of absorption of job assignments by the remaining workforce could also adversely affect our financial performance. We may not recoup the costs of programs we have already initiated, or other programs we may in the future decide to engage in, the costs of which may be significant. In addition, our profitability may decline if our restructuring efforts do not sufficiently reduce our future costs while at the same time positioning us to maintain or increase our sales and gross margins.

Price competition in our industry could adversely affect our gross margins and net sales.

Historically, we and our competitors have been able to sell clothing and roll cover products and services at favorable prices that reflect the value they deliver to customers. This favorable pricing has been particularly derived from our more technologically advanced products, such as forming fabrics, press felts and advanced roll covers. In the event that competition increases due to global economic conditions or continued over capacity in the paper manufacturing industry, we may be required to price our products, in some cases, at levels insufficient to realize our historical gross margins. Such pricing pressure from our competitors might require price decreases or make us unable to affect planned price increases and, thereby, adversely affect our profitability.

Balancing production levels at our manufacturing facilities could negatively affect our production, customer order time, product quality, labor relations or gross margin.

As part of our efforts to reduce our costs, we have attempted to reduce or eliminate excess manufacturing capacity through closure of certain of our manufacturing plants and consolidation of our production. As a result, however, from time to time our ability to meet customer demand for our products may rely on our ability to operate our remaining manufacturing facilities at or near capacity on an uninterrupted basis. Our manufacturing facilities are dependent on critical equipment, and operating such equipment at or near capacity for extended periods may result in increased equipment failures or other reliability problems, which may result in production shutdowns or periods of reduced production. Such disruptions could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results. In addition, insufficient manufacturing capacity or other delays may cause our customer order times to increase and our product quality to decrease, which may increase warranty costs and negatively affect customer demand for our products and customer relations generally. Operating our facilities at or near capacity may also negatively affect relations with our employees, which could result in higher employee turnover, labor disputes and disruptions in our operations. On the other hand, if we anticipate or experience a significant decrease in demand for our products, we may choose to temporarily decrease production or idle manufacturing facilities and employees. While decreasing production may mitigate some of the risks of operating at or near capacity discussed above, a significant drop off in production to meet lower demand, including idling facilities or employees, may negatively impact our gross margin.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our net sales, profitability and compliance with our debt covenants.

Our foreign operations expose us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and currency devaluations. We report our financial results in U.S. Dollars, but a substantial portion of our sales, expenses and debt are denominated in Euros and other currencies. As a result, changes in the relative values of U.S. Dollars, Euros and other currencies will affect our levels of net sales and profitability. Currency fluctuations, as they pertain to the Euro, generally have a greater effect on the level of our net sales due to the amount of business we conduct in Euros. An increase in the U.S. Dollar against the Euro generally results in a decrease to net sales and net income. Increases in the U.S. Dollar against other currencies, such as the Brazilian Real, would not impact consolidated net sales as much, as a significant portion of sales in that country is denominated in or indexed to U.S. Dollars, but generally would increase net income as local currency costs would be translated into lower U.S. Dollar expenses for financial reporting purposes. We would expect a similar but opposite effect in a period in which the value of the U.S. Dollar decreases against these currencies. Although in certain circumstances we attempt to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, our hedging strategies may not be effective.

In addition, our Credit Facility (defined in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Credit Facility and Notes.”) contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio and an annual limitation on capital expenditures. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Credit Facility and Notes”. Our ability to comply with these covenants will depend in part upon our reported financial results, which as indicated above, are directly affected by currency fluctuations. Since each of the financial ratio covenants are calculated by reference to the amount of our Adjusted EBITDA, currency fluctuations alone could lower the amount of our Adjusted EBITDA and therefore affect our ability to remain in compliance with our financial ratio covenants. For the purposes of computing debt, which is a key component in the calculation of the leverage ratio, indebtedness which is payable in foreign currencies shall be converted into U.S. Dollars using the average exchange rate for the most recently ended four fiscal quarters for which our financial statements are available. For additional information about the risks associated with fluctuations in currency exchange rates, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Foreign Exchange”.

Our industry is competitive and our future success will depend on our ability to effectively develop, market and supply competitive products.

The paper-making consumables industry is highly competitive. Some of our competitors are larger than us, have greater financial and other resources and are well-established as suppliers to the markets we serve. For example, while we are targeting expansion of our business in China, we face substantial competition from manufacturers already operating there that are more established and familiar with the Chinese marketplace. In addition, some of our competitors also manufacture paper-making machines and have the ability to initially package sales of their clothing and roll cover products with the sale of their machines and/or to tie the warranties on their machines to the use of their clothing and roll cover products. Due to various factors such as price or product innovation by our competitors, our products may not be able to compete successfully with the products of our competitors, which could result in a loss of customers and, as a result, decreased net sales and profitability.

Because we have substantial operations outside the United States, we are subject to the economic and political conditions of foreign nations.

We have manufacturing facilities in 13 foreign countries. In 2012, we sold products in approximately 66 countries other than the United States, which represented approximately 70.8% of our net sales. Operating in foreign countries presents challenges unique to each country such as in hiring employees, our relations with various parties, including suppliers and governmental agencies, and in production.

Furthermore, we may decide to do business in countries where we have not previously done business. In such countries we face the additional uncertainty of entering a new market and its social customs, laws and practices. Should these challenges be realized, our operating results could be adversely impacted and our business or production may be delayed.

Our foreign operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including risks that:


•	foreign governments may impose limitations on our ability to repatriate funds;


•	foreign governments may impose withholding or other taxes on remittances and other payments to us, or the amount of any such taxes may increase;


•	an outbreak or escalation of any insurrection or armed conflict may occur;


•	foreign governments may impose or increase investment barriers or other restrictions affecting our business; or


•	changes in and interpretations of tax policies of foreign governments may adversely affect our foreign subsidiaries.

The occurrence of any of these conditions could disrupt our business in particular countries or regions of the world, or prevent us from conducting business in particular countries or regions, which could adversely affect our net sales and profitability. In addition, as a holding company we rely on dividends and other payments or distributions from our subsidiaries to meet our debt obligations. If foreign governments impose limitations on our ability to repatriate funds or impose or increase taxes on remittances or other payments to us, the amount of dividends and other distributions we receive from our subsidiaries could be reduced, which could reduce the amount of cash available to us to meet our debt obligations.

Energy price increases may negatively impact our results of operations.

Certain of the components that we use in our manufacturing activities are petroleum-based. In addition, we, along with our suppliers and customers, rely on various energy sources (including oil) in our transportation activities. While significant uncertainty currently exists about the future levels of energy prices, a significant further increase is possible. Increased energy prices could cause an increase to our raw material costs and transportation costs. In addition, increased transportation costs of certain of our suppliers could be passed along to us. We may not be able to increase our prices enough to offset these increased costs. In addition, any increase in our prices may reduce our future customer orders and profitability.

We must continue to innovate and improve our products to maintain our competitive advantage.

We compete primarily based on the value our products deliver to our customers. Our value proposition is based on a combination of price and the technology and performance of our products, including the ability of our products to help reduce our customers’ production costs and increase the quality of the paper they produce. Our ability to retain our customers and increase our business depends on our ability to continually develop new, technologically superior products that support our value proposition. We cannot assure that our investments in technological development will be sufficient, that we will be able to create and market new products, that such new products will be accepted by our customers or that we will be successful in competing against new technologies developed by competitors. In addition, either we or our competitors could develop new technologies that increase the useful life of clothing or roll covers, which could reduce the frequency with which our customers would need to replace their clothing and refurbish or replace their roll covers, and consequently lead to fewer sales.

We believe that market recognition of the extended life of our roll cover products and the trend towards new paper-making machine designs which have fewer rolls will continue to negatively impact the demand for our roll cover products.

We have seen a trend that paper producers are placing an increasingly strong emphasis on maintenance cost reduction and, as a result, are extending the life of roll covers through additional maintenance cycles before replacing them. Market recognition of the extended life of our roll cover products negatively impacts the demand for these products. In addition, we have seen a trend towards new paper-making machine designs which have fewer rolls, also negatively impacting the demand for our roll cover products. If we are not able to offset these negative impacts on the demand for our roll cover products with growth from new roll cover products, the sale of roll cover products in regions which we believe have high growth potential such as China, or from other sources, the volume of our roll cover sales will be adversely affected.

The loss of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our net sales and profitability.

Our top ten customers generated 23.2% of our net sales during 2012. The loss of several major customers, financial difficulties faced by our customers or a substantial decrease in such customers’ purchases from us, could have a material adverse effect on our net sales and profitability. Because we do not generally have binding long-term purchasing agreements with our customers, there can be no assurance that our existing customers will continue to purchase products from us.

We may fail to adequately protect our proprietary technology, which would allow competitors or others to take advantage of our research and development efforts.

We rely upon trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and continuing technological innovation to develop new products and remain competitive. If our competitors learn of our proprietary technology, they may use this information to produce products that are equivalent or superior to our products, which could reduce the net sales of our products. Our employees, consultants, and corporate collaborators may breach their obligations not to reveal our confidential information, and any remedies available to us may be insufficient to compensate our damages. Even in the absence of such breaches, our trade secrets and proprietary know-how may otherwise become known to our competitors, or be independently discovered by our competitors, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

Our success and ability to compete in the future may depend upon obtaining sufficient patent protection for proprietary technology.

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, and even if they result in issued patents, the patents may not have claims of the scope we seek. Even in the event that these patents are not issued, the applications may become publicly available and proprietary information disclosed in the applications will become available to others. In addition, any issued patents may be challenged, invalidated or declared unenforceable. The term of any issued patent in the United States is 20 years from its filing date, and if our applications are pending for a long time period, we may have a correspondingly shorter term for any patent that may be issued. Our present and future patents may provide only limited protection for our technology and may not be sufficient to provide competitive advantages to us. For example, competitors could be successful in challenging any issued patents or, alternatively, could develop similar or more advantageous technologies on their own or design around our patents. Also, patent protection in certain foreign countries may not be available or may be limited in scope and any patents obtained may not be as readily enforceable as in the United States, making it difficult for us to effectively protect our intellectual property from misuse or infringement by other companies in these countries. Our inability to obtain and enforce our intellectual property rights in some countries may harm our business. In addition, given the costs of obtaining patent protection, we may choose not to protect certain innovations that later turn out to be important.

We may be liable for product defects or other claims relating to our products.

Our products could be defective, fail to perform as designed or otherwise cause harm to our customers, their equipment or their products. If any of our products are defective, we may be required to recall the products and/or repair or replace them, which could result in substantial expenses and affect our profitability. Any problems with the performance of our products could harm our reputation, which could result in a loss of sales to customers and/or potential customers. In addition, if our customers believe that they have suffered harm caused by our products, they could bring claims against us that could result in significant liability. A failure of our products could cause substantial damage to a paper-making machine. Any claims brought against us by customers may result in:


•	diversion of management’s time and attention;


•	expenditure of large amounts of cash on legal fees, expenses, and payment of damages;


•	decreased demand for our products and services; and


•	injury to our reputation.

Our insurance may not sufficiently cover a large judgment against us or a large settlement payment, and is subject to customary deductibles, limits and exclusions.

Cybersecurity incidents could disrupt business operations, result in the loss of critical and confidential information, and adversely impact our reputation and results of operations.

Global cybersecurity threats can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology (IT) systems to sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats. While we employ comprehensive measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats (including access controls, data encryption, vulnerability assessments, continuous monitoring of our IT networks and systems and maintenance of backup and protective systems), cybersecurity incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data and confidential or proprietary information (our own or that of third parties) and the disruption of business operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, litigation with third parties, diminution in the value of our investment in research,

development and engineering, and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.

Our future success depends on the continued contributions of our key senior management personnel, including members of our senior sales staff and research and development team. The loss of services of any one or more of our key personnel might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives and could cause us to incur additional costs to recruit replacements. Each member of our executive management team may terminate his or her employment at any time. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance with respect to any of our executives.

We could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of or liabilities under laws protecting the environment and human health.

Our operations and facilities are subject to a number of national, state and local laws and regulations protecting the environment and human health in the United States and foreign countries that govern, among other things, the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials, discharges of pollutants into the air and water and workplace safety. The U.S. Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”) provides for responses to, and, in some instances, joint and several liability for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Environmental laws also hold current owners or operators of land or businesses liable for their own and for previous owners’ or operators’ releases of hazardous or toxic substances, materials or wastes, pollutants or contaminants, including petroleum and petroleum products. Because of our operations, the history of industrial uses at some of our facilities, the operations of predecessor owners or operators of some of the businesses, and the use and release of hazardous substances at these sites, the liability provisions of environmental laws may affect us. Many of our facilities have experienced some level of regulatory scrutiny in the past and are or may be subject to further regulatory inspections, future requests for investigation or liability for regulated materials management practices.

We cannot assure that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to us which are designed to protect the environment and human health. We could incur substantial costs, including clean-up costs, fines and sanctions and third party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws, relevant common law or the environmental permits required for our operations or under workplace safety laws. While we believe that the current level of reserves is adequate, the adequacy of these reserves may change in the future due to new developments in particular matters.

Adverse labor relations could harm our operations and reduce our profitability.

As of December 31, 2012, we had 3,279 employees worldwide, approximately 15% of whom were subject to protection of various North American collective bargaining agreements and approximately 54% of whom were subject to job protection as members of European or South American trade unions, employee associations or workers’ councils. As of December 31, 2012, approximately 3% of the employees subject to North American collective bargaining agreements (or approximately 1% of our total employees) were covered by an agreement that was set to expire prior to December 31, 2013. We cannot be certain that we will be able to renew the collective bargaining agreement set to expire this year, or enter into a new collective bargaining agreement that does not adversely affect our operating result, or that we will be without production interruptions, including labor stoppages. In addition, all of our European and South American employees subject to job protection as members of trade unions, employee associations or workers’ councils are subject to arrangements that typically result in higher negotiated or mandated salary increases on either an annual or biannual basis. We cannot be certain that the terms of employment applicable to such employees will not change in the future in a manner which adversely affects our operating results. We cannot be certain that we will not experience disruptions in our operations as a result of labor disputes or experience other labor relations issues. If we are unable to maintain good relations with our employees, our ability to produce our products and provide services to our customers could be reduced and/or our production costs could increase, either of which could disrupt our business and reduce our net sales and profitability.

We may be subject to assessment of income taxes for which we have not accrued any liability.

We accrue for certain known and reasonably anticipated income tax obligations after assessing the likely outcome. In the event that actual results differ from these accruals or if we become subject to a tax obligation for which we have made no accrual, we may need to make adjustments, which could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations. For example, taxing authorities may disagree with our tax accounting methodologies and may subject us to inquiries regarding such taxes, which potentially could result in additional income tax assessments against us. In accordance with accounting rules, we do not accrue for potential income tax obligations if we deem a particular tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is

more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. In making our determination, we assume that the taxing authorities will have access to all relevant facts and information.

In November 2011, Xerium Technologies Brasil Indústria e Comércio S.A., a Brazilian indirect subsidiary, received a notice of proposed income tax assessment from the Federal Revenue Department of the Ministry of Finance of Brazil originally totaling approximately $41.8 million in taxes, penalties and interest (subject to currency exchange rates). Although there can be no assurances, we believe at this time, that it is more likely than not that we will prevail on every tax position under examination and therefore have not accrued any amounts related to this assessment. Because we are at a preliminary stage of the process for resolving this dispute with the Federal Revenue Department, we cannot assure a favorable outcome and cannot currently estimate the timing of the final resolution of this matter. We believe we have meritorious defenses, are vigorously contesting this matter and, if the administrative courts of the Federal Revenue Department do not rule in our favor, intend to appeal our case to the Brazilian judicial courts. However, if management's view of our position and the probable outcome of the assessment changes or the Federal Revenue Department's position is sustained by Brazilian judicial courts, the amount accrued would adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations in the period in which any such determination or decision is made.

Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure

Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to plan for and react to changes in the economy, our industry or our business and prevent us from meeting our debt obligations.

We are significantly leveraged. As of December 31, 2012, our total indebtedness was approximately $445.0 million. Our substantial degree of leverage could have important consequences to us, including the following:


•	it may limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;


•	a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes, including our operations, capital expenditures, and other business opportunities;


•	certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under our Credit Facility, are at variable rates of interest, exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates;


•	if we seek to refinance our debt or require additional refinancing in the future, we may be unable to do so on attractive terms or at all;


•	it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or our ability to adjust to, changes in our business or the industry in which we operate, and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and


•	we may be vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions or in our business, or we may be unable to carry out capital spending that is important to our growth.

Despite current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks described above.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the indenture governing the Notes do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. If we incur any additional indebtedness that ranks pari passu with our 8.875% senior unsecured notes due 2018 (the "Notes"), the holders of that new debt will be entitled to share ratably with the Note holders in any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding-up of us. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds paid to our Note holders. Additionally, our Credit Facility includes up to a $30.0 million committed revolving credit facility, under which we may borrow from time to time. Furthermore, we have an uncommitted incremental credit facility allowing for increases under the revolving credit facility and term loans, and borrowing of new tranches of term loans, in each case, up to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the greater of (i) $100.0 million and (ii) our and our subsidiaries’ Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the agreement governing our Credit Facility) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we and our subsidiaries now face could intensify. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Credit Facility and Notes” for a more complete description of the terms and features of the Credit Facility and the Notes.

Our Credit Facility and the indenture governing our Notes include a number of significant restrictions and covenants that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our Credit Facility and the indenture governing our Notes include a number of customary and significant restrictions and covenants, subject to certain exceptions, that limit our ability to, among other things:


•	incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;


•	pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock;


•	make investments;


•	create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us;


•	sell stock of our subsidiaries;


•	transfer or sell assets;


•	create liens;


•	enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and


•	enter into mergers or consolidations.

In addition, the restrictive covenants in our Credit Facility require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we can give no assurance that we will meet them. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our Credit Facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our Credit Facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders under our Credit Facility could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. We have pledged a significant portion of our assets as collateral under our Credit Facility. If the lenders under our Credit Facility accelerate the repayment of borrowings, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient assets to repay our Credit Facility and our other indebtedness, including the Notes, or borrow sufficient funds to refinance such indebtedness. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or terms that are acceptable to us.

Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our liquidity, interest expense and financial results.

The term loans under our Credit Facility have variable interest rates. To the extent that we do not enter into hedging arrangements that effectively fix the interest rate on a portion of our senior debt, the interest rate on all of the debt covered by our Credit Facility will fluctuate based on LIBOR, Euribor and other variable interest rates. To the extent these interest rates increase, our interest expense may increase, in which event, we may have difficulty making interest payments and funding our other costs and our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our Credit Facility may be adversely affected. On August 8, 2011, we entered into interest rate caps covering a portion of our floating rate debt, which provide interest rate protection in the event LIBOR or Euribor exceed 3.0%. Consequently, our financial statements are exposed to the effects of interest rate fluctuations below 3.0%, which could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. There can be no assurance that our future operating performance will generate sufficient cash flows to support our cash requirements. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. There can be no assurance that we would be able to take any of these actions, that these actions would be successful and permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including the Credit Facility or the indenture that governs our Notes. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. Our Credit Facility and the indenture that governs the Notes restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from the disposition. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or obtain the proceeds which we could realize from them, and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.

If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and, as a result our debt holders could declare all outstanding debt to be due and payable; the lenders under our Credit Facility could terminate their commitments to lend us money, declare all outstanding amounts there under due and payable, and foreclose against the assets securing their borrowings; and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation, which could result in our security holders’ loss of their investment.

Risks Relating to Our Notes

Not all of our subsidiaries guarantee our obligations under the Notes, and the Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The Notes are guaranteed by each of our existing and subsequently acquired, direct or indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Except for such subsidiary guarantors of the Notes, our subsidiaries, including all of our foreign subsidiaries and our subsidiaries that are less than wholly-owned, have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due under the Notes or to make any funds available to pay those amounts, whether by dividend, distribution, loan or other payment.

The Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of any non-guarantor subsidiary, even if such obligations do not constitute senior indebtedness, such that, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding up of any non-guarantor subsidiary, all of such subsidiary’s creditors (including trade creditors and preferred stockholders, if any) would be entitled to payment in full out of such subsidiary’s assets before we would be entitled to any payment. As a result, the Notes are effectively subordinated to all liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

Our non-guarantor subsidiaries also may be subject to restrictions on their ability to distribute cash to us as a result of law and, as a result, we may not be able to access their cash flows to service our debt obligations, including the Notes.

Our non-guarantor subsidiaries accounted for approximately $407.6 million or 75.7% of our net sales for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012 and $470.7 million or 76.1% of our total assets and $389.1 million or 60.1% of our total liabilities as of December 31, 2012.

A Note holder’s right to receive payments on the Notes is effectively junior to those lenders who have a security interest in our assets.

Our obligations under the Notes and the guarantors’ obligations under their guarantees of the Notes are unsecured. As a result, the Notes and the related guarantees are effectively subordinated to all of our and the guarantors’ secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. Our obligations under our Credit Facility are secured by a pledge of substantially all of our and our guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets. In the event that we or a guarantor are declared bankrupt, become insolvent or are liquidated or reorganized, our obligations under our Credit Facility and any other secured obligations will be entitled to be paid in full from our assets or the assets of such guarantor, as the case may be, pledged as security for such obligation before any payment may be made with respect to the Notes. Holders of the Notes would participate ratably in our remaining assets or the remaining assets of the guarantor, as the case may be, with all holders of unsecured indebtedness that are deemed to rank equally with the Notes, based upon the respective amount owed to each creditor. In addition, if we default under our Credit Facility, the lenders could declare all of the funds borrowed thereunder, together with accrued interest, immediately due and payable. If we were unable to repay such indebtedness, the lenders could foreclose on the pledged assets to the exclusion of holders of the Notes, even if an event of default exists under the indenture under which the Notes were issued at such time. Furthermore, if the lenders foreclose and sell the pledged equity interests in any subsidiary guarantor under the Notes, then that subsidiary guarantor will be released from its guarantee of the Notes automatically and immediately upon such sale. In any such event, because the Notes are not secured by any of our assets or the equity interests in subsidiary guarantors, it is possible that there would be no assets remaining from which Note holder claims could be satisfied or, if any assets remained, they might be insufficient to satisfy Note holder claims fully.

As of December 31, 2012, we and our guarantor subsidiaries had $200.5 million of secured indebtedness under our Credit Facility which does not include additional borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility or incremental facility. The indenture governing the Notes permits the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness by us and our restricted subsidiaries in the future, including secured indebtedness. Any secured indebtedness incurred would rank senior to the Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

Our ability to repay the Notes depends on the performance of our subsidiaries, including our non-guarantor subsidiaries, and their ability to make payments or distributions.

We conduct a significant portion of our operations through our subsidiaries. Accordingly, repayment of our indebtedness, including the Notes, is dependent, to a significant extent, on the generation of cash flow by our subsidiaries and their ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Unless they are guarantors of the Notes, our subsidiaries, including all of our foreign subsidiaries, do not have any obligation to pay amounts due on the Notes or to make funds available for that purpose. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments in respect of our indebtedness, including the Notes. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. While the indenture governing the Notes limits the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to incur consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make other intercompany payments to us, these limitations are subject to certain qualifications and exceptions.

If cash flow from our U.S. operations is insufficient to make payments of principal and interest on our debt, including amounts due under the Notes, we must rely on cash flow from our foreign operations to make these payments.

In addition, our ability to repatriate cash generated by our foreign operations or borrow from our foreign subsidiaries may be limited by tax, foreign exchange or other laws. Foreign earnings may be subject to withholding requirements for foreign taxes. Cash we hold in foreign entities may become subject to exchange controls that prevent their being converted into other currencies, including dollars. Foreign tax laws may affect our ability to repatriate cash from foreign subsidiaries in a tax efficient manner or at all. Legal and contractual dividend restrictions may prevent foreign subsidiaries from paying dividends or other cash distributions to service payments on the Notes, and directors and officers of such foreign subsidiaries may therefore be unable or unwilling to authorize such payments or such loans. If these or other risks limit our ability to transfer cash generated by our foreign operations to us, our ability to make payments on our debt, including amounts due under the Notes, would be harmed.

We may not be able to satisfy our obligations to holders of the Notes upon a change in control.

In the event of a change in control, each Note holder may require us to purchase all or a portion of his or her Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date of purchase. Our ability to repurchase the Notes upon a change in control is limited by the terms of our Credit Facility and our other debt. Upon a change in control, we may be required immediately to repay the outstanding principal, any accrued interest and any other amounts owed by us under the Credit Facility. There can be no assurance that we would be able to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility or obtain necessary consents under the Credit Facility to repurchase the Notes. Any requirement to offer to purchase any outstanding Notes may result in us having to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to do. In addition, even if we were able to refinance this debt, the refinancing may not be on terms favorable to us. Our failure to purchase the Notes would be a default under the indenture governing the Notes.

The change in control provision in the indenture may not protect Note holders in the event we consummate a highly leveraged transaction, reorganization, restructuring, merger or other similar transaction, unless such transaction constitutes a change in control under the indenture. Such a transaction may not involve a change in voting power or beneficial ownership or, even if it does, may not involve a change of the magnitude required under the definition of change in control triggering event in the indenture to trigger our obligation to repurchase the Notes. Except as described above, the indenture does not contain provisions that permit the holders of the Notes to require us to repurchase or redeem the Notes in an event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction.

Our Notes are not listed on an exchange and the market price for our Notes may be volatile.

Our Notes are not listed on an exchange and we do not know if or when an active trading market for our Notes will develop, if at all. In addition, the market for non-investment-grade debt has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of securities similar to our Notes. The market for our Notes, if any, may be subject to similar disruptions, and any such disruptions may adversely affect their value. Holders may not be able to sell their Notes at a particular time or at a favorable price.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

We do not anticipate paying a dividend on our common stock in the foreseeable future, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our Credit Facility and the indenture governing our Notes limit or prohibit the payment of dividends on our common stock. Accordingly, we do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. The lack of dividend payments may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock has been volatile since our initial public offering and may continue to be volatile.

Shares of our common stock may continue to experience substantial price volatility, including significant decreases, in response to a number of events, including:


•	sales of our common stock by principal stockholders;


•	our quarterly operating results;


•	issuances of our common stock;


•	future announcements concerning our business;


•	our dividend policy;


•	the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock and/or changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts;


•	actions of competitors;


•	fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;


•	changes in U.S. and foreign government regulation;


•	general market, economic and political conditions; and


•	natural disasters, terrorist attacks and acts of war.

On December 31, 2012, the last trading day in 2012, the closing price of our common stock was $3.05 as compared with $6.54 as of December 31, 2011. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, the lowest price of our common stock was $2.64 and the highest price was $9.84.

Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities class action lawsuits filed against them. Such lawsuits, should they be filed against us in the future, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain shareholders have significant influence over our business and significant transactions.

On the date we emerged from bankruptcy protection, referred to as the Effective Date, by operation of the plan of reorganization, all of our common stock then outstanding, par value $0.01 or old common stock, was canceled and approximately 82.6% of our new common stock, par value $0.001 was issued to our lenders. Holders of our old common stock were issued approximately 17.4% of the new common stock, along with warrants to purchase up to an additional 10% of the new common stock outstanding on the Effective Date on a fully diluted basis. Also pursuant to the plan of reorganization, a majority of the directors serving on our reconstituted Board of Directors were nominated by certain of our then-lenders, including American Securities LLC (together with its affiliates, “American Securities”) and Carl Marks Strategic Investments, L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Carl Marks”). We also entered into director nomination agreements with certain of our then-lenders, including American Securities and Carl Marks, pursuant to which the applicable lender(s) may designate one individual for nomination to our Board of Directors, so long as the lender(s) continues to own at least 50% of the new common stock issued to such lender(s) under the plan of reorganization.

As of March 2, 2013, Carl Marks owns 13.5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Mr. Wilson, who is a general partner of Carl Marks Management Company, is also a member of our Board of Directors. As a result, Carl Marks has a strong ability to influence our business, policies and affairs, and we cannot be certain that their interests will be consistent with the interests of other holders of our common stock. Additionally, because American Securities, which owns 14.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of March 1, 2013, has the right to appoint a director nominee to the Board pursuant to the Director Nomination Agreement, if American Securities chose to exercise that right, the individual they select would also have a strong ability to influence our business, policies and affairs, and we could not be certain that their interests would be consistent with the interests of other holders of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us.

We have adopted a stockholder rights plan and issued a dividend of one right for each share of our common stock outstanding. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one one-thousandth of a preferred share, at a price of $60.00 per one one-thousandth of a preferred share, subject to adjustment. Subject to limited exceptions, in the event a person (which includes affiliates and associates) acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock without prior approval of our Board of Directors, holders of the common stock, other than the acquirer, may exercise their rights to purchase our common stock (or, in certain circumstances, preferred shares or other of our similar securities) having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. Because the rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us over without the approval of our Board of Directors, our rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us (or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock) without first negotiating with our Board of Directors regarding that acquisition.

In addition, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1 million shares of preferred stock (of which 20,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock) and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders.

The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of our company without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. Further, some provisions of our charter documents, including provisions eliminating the ability of stockholders to take action by written consent and limiting the ability of stockholders to raise matters at a meeting of stockholders without giving advance notice, may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or management of our company, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock. In addition, our

charter documents do not permit cumulative voting, which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our Board of Directors. Further, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prohibit us from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, even if such combination is favored by a majority of stockholders, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 also could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.

If we cannot meet the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") continued listing requirements, the NYSE may delist our common stock, which could have an adverse impact on the liquidity and market price of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE. On August 2, 2012, we received a notice from the NYSE informing us that our average market capitalization over a 30 consecutive trading day period had been less than $50 million at the same time that our stockholders’ equity was less than $50 million as of the most recent balance sheet date. As of March 1, 2013 when our stock price closed at $5.20, our 30-day average market capitalization was $69.4 million and at December 31, 2012, our stockholders’ deficit was $(29.1) million, as reflected on the balance sheet included in this December 31, 2012 annual report. Although our 30-day average market capitalization currently exceeds $50 million, there can be no assurance that it will remain above the required NYSE criteria. Additionally, we have submitted, and the NYSE has accepted, a plan to regain compliance with the market capitalization listing standards within 18 months. If we are unable to regain compliance with this NYSE continued listing standard in accordance with our plan in a timely manner, the NYSE could delist our stock which could negatively impact us and our stockholders by reducing the liquidity and market price of our common stock.



ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.



ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2012, we operate 34 facilities, of which 30 are manufacturing facilities in the following 13 countries: Argentina, Austria, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain and the United States. Of the 30 manufacturing facilities that we operate, 11 are clothing manufacturing facilities, 17 are rolls manufacturing facilities and 2 are both clothing and rolls facilities. Almost all of our facilities are owned by us, rather than leased.

Excluded from the above property information is a vacant facility which is held for sale at December 31, 2011 and 2012 and a rolls facility which ceased production in the fourth quarter of 2012 and is held for sale at December 31, 2012.



ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We and our subsidiaries are involved in various legal matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business as a result of various labor claims, taxing authority reviews and other legal matters. As of December 31, 2012, we accrued an immaterial amount in our financial statements for these matters for which we believed the possibility of loss was either probable or possible, and we were able to estimate the damages or, under applicable income tax accounting guidance, it was more likely than not we would not be able to sustain a particular income tax position. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.

Governmental Proceedings and Undertakings.

In November of 2011, the Federal Revenue Department of the Ministry of Finance of Brazil (“FRD”) issued a tax assessment against our indirect subsidiary, Xerium Technologies Brasil Indústria e Comércio S.A. (“Xerium Brazil”), challenging the goodwill recorded in the 2005 acquisition of Wangner Itelpa and Huyck Indústria e Comércio S.A. by Robec Brasil Participações Ltda. The original assessment denies the amortization of that goodwill against net income for the years 2006 through 2010 and originally sought payment of approximately $41.8 million (subject to currency exchange rates) of tax, penalties and interest. We believe the transactions in question (i) complied with Brazilian tax and accounting rules, (ii) were effected for a legitimate business purpose, to consolidate our operating activities in Brazil into one legal entity, and (iii) were properly documented and declared to Brazilian tax and corporate authorities. Based on the foregoing, Xerium Brazil filed a response with the FRD in December 2011 disputing the tax assessment. In December 2012, an administrative panel at the first administrative appeals level within the FRD rendered a decision upholding the assessment, but reducing the penalties claimed

by fifty percent. This decision reduced the total assessment by approximately $11.2 million to $30.5 million as of December 31, 2012, although the reduced penalty will be appealed by Brazilian federal attorneys. On January 18, 2013, Xerium Brazil appealed the decision of this first administrative panel to the second of three administrative appeals courts potentially available to it within the FRD.

Although there can be no assurances, we believe at the time of this filing, that it is more likely than not that we will prevail on every tax position under examination and therefore we have not accrued any amounts related to this assessment. Because we are still at a preliminary stage of the process for resolving this dispute with the FRD, we cannot assure a favorable outcome and cannot currently estimate the timing of the final resolution of this matter. We believe we have meritorious defenses, are continuing to vigorously contest this matter and, if the administrative courts of the FRD do not rule in our favor, intend to appeal our case to the Brazilian judicial courts. However, if management's view of our position and the probable outcome of the assessment changes or the FRD's position is sustained by Brazilian judicial courts, the amount accrued would adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations in the period in which any such determination or decision is made.



ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II



ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “XRM”. On March 1, 2013, there were approximately 106 stockholders of record of our common stock and the closing price of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $5.20 per share. The following table lists the high and low sales prices for our common stock within the two most recent fiscal years.



Period	High		Low
2012
Fourth quarter	$	3.71	$	2.95
Third quarter	$	4.51	$	2.83
Second quarter	$	6.80	$	2.64
First quarter	$	9.84	$	6.20
2011
Fourth quarter	$	11.04	$	6.30
Third quarter	$	19.07	$	10.02
Second quarter	$	25.51	$	17.58
First quarter	$	24.45	$	15.75

The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

Our current credit facility limits, and our previous credit facility prohibited our payment of dividends and accordingly, we made no such payments during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012.

* $100 invested on 12/31/2007 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Excludes value of warrants distributed to shareholders in May of 2010. Fiscal year ending December 31.



ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. All per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect a 20-to-1 reverse stock split of our common stock occurring on May 25, 2010.



	Year ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of operations data:
Net sales	$	538,740		$	586,960		$	548,334		$	500,091		$	638,139
Costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold	345,171			370,754			333,958			312,596			394,467
Selling	76,083			79,407			72,883			66,808			80,175
General and administrative	63,701			62,012			74,798			56,169			92,112
Research and development	11,681			12,097			11,427			11,309			11,740
Restructuring	25,708			1,589			10,004			4,080			16,968
Goodwill impairment	—			—			—			80,600			—
Curtailment/settlement gains	—			—			—			—			(39,968		)
Total operating costs and expenses	522,344			525,859			503,070			531,562			555,494
Income (loss) from operations	16,396			61,101			45,264			(31,471		)	82,645
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net	(37,878		)	(39,150		)	(56,795		)	(67,300		)	(58,504		)
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt	243			(2,926		)	—			—			—
Foreign exchange (loss) gain	(358		)	(156		)	1,668			(905		)	6,356
(Loss) income before reorganization items and benefit (provision) for income taxes	(21,597		)	18,869			(9,863		)	(99,676		)	30,497
Reorganization expense	—			—			(44,957		)	—			—
(Loss) income before benefit (provision) for income taxes	(21,597		)	18,869			(54,820		)	(99,676		)	30,497
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	3,562			(10,679		)	(18,266		)	(12,317		)	(3,901		)
Net (loss) income	$	(18,035	)	$	8,190		$	(73,086	)	$	(111,993	)	$	26,596
Net (loss) income per common share—basic	$	(1.18	)	$	0.54		$	(7.29	)	$	(45.80	)	$	11.60
Net (loss) income per common share—diluted	$	(1.18	)	$	0.54		$	(7.29	)	$	(45.80	)	$	11.60
Cash dividends per common share	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

	Year ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	$	34,777		$	43,566		$	38,701		$	23,039		$	34,733
Total assets	618,843			665,721			689,942			693,511			818,097
Total debt	444,992			469,054			481,177			640,121			616,957
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity	(29,061		)	(2,305		)	18,735			(119,657		)	(27,581		)
Cash flow data:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	39,322		$	45,208		$	20,734		$	16,131		$	77,068
Net cash used in investing activities	(20,617		)	(8,688		)	(37,488		)	(14,171		)	(35,233		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(27,472		)	(31,463		)	32,626			(14,630		)	(32,312		)
Other financial data:
Depreciation and amortization	$	40,838		$	43,686		$	41,281		$	41,867		$	45,928
Capital expenditures	21,705			30,154			27,928			19,532			39,028



ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the section titled “Risk Factors,” the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Company Overview

We are a leading global manufacturer and supplier of two types of consumable products used primarily in the production of paper—clothing and roll covers. Our operations are strategically located in the major paper-producing regions of North America, Europe, South America and Asia-Pacific.

Our products play key roles in the formation and processing of paper along the length of a paper-making machine. Paper producers rely on our products and services to help improve the quality of their paper, differentiate their paper products, operate their paper-making machines more efficiently and reduce production costs. Our products and services typically represent only a small percentage of a paper producer’s overall production costs, yet they can reduce costs by permitting the use of lower-cost raw materials and by reducing energy consumption. Paper producers must replace clothing and refurbish or replace roll covers periodically as these products wear down during the paper production process. Our products are designed to withstand high temperatures, chemicals, and high pressure conditions, and are the result of a substantial investment in research and development and highly sophisticated manufacturing processes.

We operate in two principal business segments: clothing and roll covers. In our clothing segment, we manufacture and sell highly engineered synthetic textile belts that transport paper as it is processed in a paper-making machine. Clothing plays a significant role in the forming, pressing and drying stages of paper production. Because paper-making processes and machine specifications vary widely, the clothing size, form, material and function is custom engineered to fit each individual paper-making machine and process. For the year ended December 31, 2012, our clothing segment represented 66% of our net sales.

Our roll cover products provide a surface with the mechanical properties necessary to process the paper sheet in a cost-effective manner that delivers the sheet qualities desired by the paper producer. Roll covers are tailored to individual paper-making machines and processes, using different materials, treatments and finishings. In addition to manufacturing and selling new roll covers, we also provide refurbishment services for previously installed roll covers and we manufacture new and rebuilt spreader rolls. We also provide various related products and services to our customers, both directly and through third party providers, as a growing part of our overall product offering through our roll covers sales channels. For the year ended December 31, 2012, our roll cover segment represented 34% of our net sales.

Industry Trends and Outlook

Historically, demand for our products has been driven primarily by the volume (tonnage) of paper produced on a worldwide basis, which in turn is affected by global economic conditions. Since 2000, paper producers have taken actions that seek to structurally improve the balance between the supply of, and demand for, paper in response to the industry's highly cyclical swings in profitability driven by the oversupply of paper during periods when paper producers have more aggregate capacity than the market requires. As part of these efforts, they have permanently shut down many paper-making machines or entire manufacturing facilities.

Between the second half of 2008 and 2009, the global paper industry experienced a sharp reduction in production levels, caused by the general slowdown in economic activity and related paper consumption during the same period. One of the results of this recession driven reduction in demand for paper products was that the paper manufacturers dramatically and quickly reduced production through accelerated curtailments of machines and complete mill shutdowns that were already an underlying trend. These additional curtailments, which began in late 2008, served to reduce inventories and attempt to match output with demand. By early 2010, most mills and equipment not permanently shuttered had resumed production.

Beginning about the same time the paper industry began to address the structural balance between the supply and demand for paper, the widespread adoption of e-commerce and digitalization of traditionally printed material has resulted in a prolonged decline in newsprint and printing and writing grades of paper. This longer term decline has been partially offset by increases in the production of packaging grades, both as a consequence of globalization of manufacturing and as a result of the increase of tissue/personal care products which have increased as global GDP has risen, particularly in the developing world. In 2010 and 2011, global paper and board production began to recover from the economic recession and show growth, particularly in developing countries. As international shipments of manufactured goods increased, containerboard production

Table of Contents

recovered particularly strongly, contributing over 50% of the total global improvement. The paper and board production recovery, however, stalled in the second half of 2011 and remained weak throughout 2012, particularly in Europe and South America.

In the near term, we expect that global paper and board manufacturers' operating rates will remain near their 2012 levels, while industry forecasters predict the growth of global paper production from 2013 to 2015 to be between approximately 2% and 4% per annum. Generally, and over time, we expect growth in paper production to be greater in Asia-Pacific, South America and Eastern Europe than in the more mature North American and Western European regions, where demand may decline.

Despite projected growth, many paper producers continue to experience low levels of profitability. Any anticipated global paper production growth would be moderated by further consolidation among papermakers, reduction in the number of paper producers, and shutdowns of paper-making machines or facilities, which we believe will continue, particularly in Europe and North America, until there is a better balance between supply and demand for paper and the profit levels of paper producers improve.

Also affecting machine curtailments are structural productivity gains from new paper machine designs that have fewer rolls and from improved products that we and our competitors supply, which enable paper producers to manufacture more paper with fewer machines. In particular, market recognition of the extended life of our roll cover products has, and will likely continue to, negatively impact demand for these products and their volume potential. Additionally, we are seeing a trend that paper producers are placing an increasing emphasis on maintenance cost reduction and, as a result, are extending the life of roll covers through additional maintenance cycles before replacing them. However, we believe volume declines would be at least partially offset by our introduction of new products with the extended life qualities that our customer's desire and increasing market share of proprietary products such as our SmartRoll™.

In response to this, we expect to continue to focus our research and development efforts on new products that deliver increased value to our customers and for which they will pay increased prices. In addition, we intend to continue to enhance and deploy our value added selling approach as part of our strategy to differentiate our products, while at the same time we remain focused on cost reduction and efficiency programs.

The negative paper industry trends described above are likely to continue. We believe that the paper industry will continue to experience an increased emphasis on cost reduction and continued paper-machine shutdown activity. These underlying industry dynamics could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and are the key drivers behind our strategy to reduce our cost structure, align our geographic footprint with anticipated growth in the South America and Asia-Pacific regions and grow our non-paper business revenue streams.

Net Sales and Expenses

Net sales in both our clothing and roll covers segments are primarily driven by the following factors:



	Ÿ		The volume (tonnage) of worldwide paper production;



	Ÿ		Our ability to introduce new products that our customers value and will pay for;



	Ÿ		Advances in the technology of our products, which can provide value to our customers by improving the efficiency of paper-making machines and reduce their manufacturing costs;



	Ÿ		Growth in developing markets, particularly in Asia;



	Ÿ		The mix of paper grades being produced;



	Ÿ		Our ability to enter and expand our business in non-paper products; and

Table of Contents



	Ÿ		The impact of currency fluctuations.

Net sales in our roll covers segment include our mechanical services business. We have expanded this business in response to demand from paper producers that we perform work on the internal mechanisms of their rolls while we refurbish or replace a roll cover. In our clothing segment, a small portion of our business has been conducted pursuant to consignment arrangements; for these, we do not recognize a sale of a product to a customer until the customer places the product into use, which typically occurs some period after the product is shipped to the customer or to a warehouse location near the customer’s facility. As part of the consignment agreement, we deliver the goods to a location designated by the customer. In addition, we agree to a “sunset” date with the customer, which represents the date by which the customer must accept all risks and responsibilities of ownership of the product and payment terms begin. For consignment sales, revenue is recognized on the earlier of the actual product installation date or the “sunset” date.

Our operating cost levels are impacted by total sales volume, raw material costs, the impact of inflation, foreign currency fluctuations and the success of our cost reduction programs.

The level of our cost of products sold is primarily attributable to labor costs, raw material costs, product shipping costs, plant utilization and depreciation, with labor costs constituting the largest component. We invest in facilities and equipment that enable innovative product development and improve production efficiency and costs. Recent examples of capital spending for such purposes include faster weaving looms and seaming machines with accurate electronic controls, automated compound mixing equipment and computer-controlled lathes and mills.

The level of research and development spending is driven by market demand for technology enhancements, including both specific customer needs and general market requirements, as well as by our own analysis of applied technology opportunities. With the exception of purchases of equipment and similar capital items used in our research and development activities, all research and development is expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses were $11.7 million, $12.1 million and $11.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively.

Foreign Exchange

We have a geographically diverse customer base. In the year ended December 31, 2012, we generated approximately 38% of our net sales in North America, 31% in Europe, 9% in South America, 20% in Asia-Pacific and 2% in the rest of the world.

A substantial portion of our net sales is denominated in Euros or other currencies. As a result, changes in the relative values of U.S. Dollars, Euros and other currencies affect our reported levels of net sales and profitability as the results are translated into U.S. Dollars for reporting purposes. In particular, decreases in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the value of the Euro and these other currencies positively impact our levels of revenue and profitability because the translation of a certain number of Euros or units of such other currencies into U.S. Dollars for financial reporting purposes will represent more U.S. Dollars than it would have prior to the relative decrease in the value of the U.S. Dollar. Conversely, a decline in the value of the Euro will result in a lower number of U.S. Dollars for financial reporting purposes.

For certain transactions, our net sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars but all or a substantial portion of the associated costs are denominated in a different currency. As a result, changes in the relative values of U.S. Dollars, Euros and other currencies can affect the level of the profitability of these transactions. The largest proportion of such transactions consists of transactions in which the net sales are denominated in or indexed to the U.S. Dollar and all or a substantial portion of the associated costs are denominated in Brazilian Reals or other currencies.

Currency fluctuations have a greater effect on the level of our net sales than on the level of our income (loss) from operations. For example, in the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, the change in the value of the U.S. Dollar against most of the currencies we conduct our business in resulted in net currency decreases in net sales of $20.1 million, yet income from operations currency effects increased by $4.8 million. Although the year ended December 31, 2012 results reflect a period in which the value of the U.S. Dollar increased against the Euro as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, we would expect an opposite effect in a period in which the value of the U.S. Dollar decreases.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we conducted business in 9 foreign currencies. The following table provides the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 of the U.S. Dollar against each of the four foreign currencies in which we conduct the largest portion of our operations.

Table of Contents



Currency	Average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar in the year ended December 31, 2012	Average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar in the year ended December 31, 2011
Euro	$1.29 = 1 Euro	$1.39 = 1 Euro
Brazilian Real	$0.51 = 1 Brazilian Real	$0.60 = 1 Brazilian Real
Canadian Dollar	$1.00 = 1 Canadian Dollar	$1.01 = 1 Canadian Dollar
Australian Dollar	$1.04 = 1 Australian Dollar	$1.03 = 1 Australian Dollar

In the year ended December 31, 2012, we conducted approximately 35% of our operations in Euros, approximately 10% in the Australian Dollar, approximately 8% in the Brazilian Real (although a significant portion of Brazil net sales are in U.S. Dollars) and approximately 6% in the Canadian Dollar.

To mitigate the risk of transactions in which a sale is made in one currency and associated costs are denominated in a different currency, we may utilize forward currency contracts in certain circumstances to lock in exchange rates with the objective that the gain or loss on the forward contracts will approximate the loss or gain that results from the transaction or transactions being hedged. We determine whether to enter into hedging arrangements based upon the size of the underlying transaction or transactions, an assessment of the risk of adverse movements in the applicable currencies and the availability of a cost effective hedge strategy. To the extent we do not engage in hedging or such hedging is not effective, changes in the relative value of currencies can affect our profitability.

Domestic and Foreign Operating Results:

The following is an analysis of our domestic and foreign operations during the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and a discussion of the results of operations during those periods (in thousands):



	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011
Domestic income from operations	$	2,808	$	7,317
Foreign income from operations	13,588		53,784
Total income from operations	$	16,396	$	61,101

During the year ended December 31, 2012, domestic income from operations was lower than foreign income from operations primarily due to product mix and market differences. Excess cash generated from operations will typically remain permanently reinvested in most foreign subsidiaries. If cash does not remain permanently reinvested, income tax would need to be recorded. However, there are no legal restrictions or material adverse consequence for repatriating the excess cash to the domestic subsidiaries to assist in debt repayment, capital expenditures and other expenses of our operations.

Debt Refinancing

On May 26, 2011, we completed a refinancing transaction, which replaced certain of our then outstanding indebtedness with an offering of $240 million of our 8.875% senior unsecured notes due 2018 and a new approximately $278 million multi-currency senior secured credit facility, comprised of approximately $248 million of senior secured term loans and a committed $30 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The goal of the refinancing was to extend the maturity of, and fix the interest rate on, a portion of our debt, while providing lower interest rates and increased operational flexibility. See “Credit Facility and Notes” for a discussion of the notes and current credit facility.

Chapter 11 Filing, Emergence and Plan of Reorganization

On March 30, 2010, we and certain of our subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532, and on April 1, 2010, following approval by the Bankruptcy Court, we entered into a debtor-in-possession financing facility consisting of a $20 million revolving credit facility and $60 million term loan (the “Exit Facility”). On May 25, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), our amended joint prepackaged plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) became effective, at which time we emerged from Chapter 11. Pursuant to the Plan, on the Effective Date:


•	20 million shares of our new common stock, par value $0.001 were authorized, of which an aggregate of 14,970,050 shares were issued and outstanding, as described below. In addition, 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, were authorized, of which 20,000 shares were designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock;

Table of Contents


•	All of the shares of our common stock then outstanding, par value $0.01, or old common stock, were canceled and replaced with 2,566,150 shares of our new common stock, which was equivalent to a 20 to 1 reverse split of our old common stock;


•	The lenders under our pre-petition credit facility and the interest rate swap termination counterparties received, among other things, their ratable shares of (a) $10 million in cash, (b) $410 million in principal amount of term notes, issued pursuant to our post-reorganization senior credit facility (the “Prior Credit Facility”), and (c) 12,403,900 shares of new common stock;


•	Holders of our old common stock also received four-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,663,760 shares of new common stock at an exercise price of $19.55 per share, representing approximately 0.0324108 warrants for each share of old common stock.

As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we entered into a number of material agreements and engaged in a series of transactions on the Effective Date, including (i) the Prior Credit Facility (ii) the Exit Facility, (iii) a Rights Agreement, (iv) a Registration Rights Agreement with certain of our stockholders, and (v) Director Nomination Agreements with certain of our stockholders.

Cost Reduction Programs

An important part of our strategy is to seek to reduce our overall costs and improve our competitiveness. As a part of this effort, we engage in cost reduction programs, which are designed to improve the cost structure of our global operations in response to changing market conditions. These cost reduction programs include headcount reductions throughout the world as well as plant closures that are intended to rationalize production among our facilities to better enable us to match our cost structure with customer demand. Cost savings have been realized and are expected to be realized in labor costs and other production overhead, other components of costs of products sold, general and administrative expenses and facility costs. The majority of cost savings begin at the time of the headcount reductions and plant closure with remaining cost savings recognized over subsequent periods. Cost savings from headcount reductions have not been and are not expected to be offset by related increases in other expenses. Cost savings related to plant closures have been and are expected to be partially offset by additional costs incurred in the facilities that assumed the operations of the closed facility.

During 2012, we incurred $25.7 million in restructuring expenses, of which $21.3 million, $4.3 million and $0.1 million were in the clothing, rolls and corporate segments, respectively. This amount includes costs incurred as a result of (1) the reduction of selling costs in Europe via termination of sales agency agreements, resulting in $3.6 million of restructuring costs; (2) the closure of clothing production operation in Argentina, resulting in $2.1 million of restructuring costs; (3) the closure of roll covering plant in France, resulting in $3.7 million of restructuring costs; (4) the reduction of base costs via headcount reductions primarily in Europe, resulting in $8.0 million of restructuring costs, and (6) the planned closure of clothing plant in Spain, resulting in restructuring costs of $8.3 million. Included in these costs were impairment charges of $2.5 million taken in 2012 on the Argentina, France and Spain facilities, as a result of closing those facilities.

In 2011, we incurred restructuring expenses of approximately $1.6 million, primarily related to the continued streamlining of our cost structure and operations.

In 2010, we incurred restructuring expenses of approximately $10.0 million in the aggregate, primarily related to the closure of our North Bay, Ontario facility, the closure of a rolls plant in Germany, the impairment of our idle facility and headcount reductions resulting from the integration of the regional management structure in North America and Europe.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The table that follows sets forth for the periods presented certain consolidated operating results.



	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	538,740		$	586,960		$	548,334
Costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold	345,171			370,754			333,958
Selling	76,083			79,407			72,883
General and administrative	63,701			62,012			74,798
Research and development	11,681			12,097			11,427
Restructuring	25,708			1,589			10,004
	522,344			525,859			503,070
Income from operations	16,396			61,101			45,264
Interest expense, net	(37,878		)	(39,150		)	(56,795		)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt	243			(2,926		)	—
Foreign exchange (loss) gain	(358		)	(156		)	1,668
(Loss) income before reorganization expenses and provision for income taxes	(21,597		)	18,869			(9,863		)
Reorganization expense	—			—			(44,957		)
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes	(21,597		)	18,869			(54,820		)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	3,562			(10,679		)	(18,266		)
Net (loss) income	$	(18,035	)	$	8,190		$	(73,086	)

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to the Year December 31, 2011

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $48.3 million, or 8.2%, to $538.7 million from $587.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately 66% of our net sales were in our clothing segment and approximately 34% were in our roll covers segment.

In our clothing segment, net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $32.2 million, or 8.3%, to $354.2 million from $386.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to decreased sales volume of $13.4 million in Europe, $2.9 million in North America and $3.0 million in South America and unfavorable currency effects of $13.2 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in sales volume of $0.3 million in Asia Pacific.

In our roll covers segment, net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $15.9 million or 7.9%, to $184.6 million from $200.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to decreased sales volume of $10.6 million in Europe, $2.0 million in North America and $0.5 million in South America and unfavorable currency effects of $6.9 million, partially offset by an increase in sales volume of $4.1 million in Asia Pacific.

Cost of Products Sold. Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $25.6 million, or 6.9%, to $345.2 million from $370.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

In our clothing segment, cost of products sold decreased $17.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 as a result of lower sales volume, partially offset by higher cost of products sold as a percentage of sales. Cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales increased by 0.8% to 63.4% in the year ended December 31, 2012 from 62.6% in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily related unfavorable factory absorption due to lower production volume, the reduction of inventory reserves in the prior year, and unfavorable regional and product mix. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in freight, supplies and repairs and maintenance costs in the year ended December 31, 2012.

In our roll covers segment, cost of products sold decreased $9.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 as a result of lower sales volume partially offset by higher cost of products sold as a

Table of Contents

percentage of sales. Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, increased by 0.5% to 66.1% in the year ended December 31, 2012 from 65.6% in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was due to new roll core sales with lower margins, increased depreciation and unfavorable currency effects. These increases were partially offset by favorable material costs and lower sales of products to paper machine OEMs which carry lower margins.

Selling Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2012, selling expenses decreased by $3.3 million, or 4.2% to $76.1 million from $79.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to favorable currency effects of $3.3 million and $1.2 million related to the termination of a sales agency arrangement and a reduction of headcount in Europe. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in salaries and selling commission costs of $1.3 million, primarily in Asia.

General and Administrative Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2012, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.7 million, or 2.7% to $63.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $62.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily related to $2.8 million incremental CEO transition costs in 2012, an additional impairment charge of $1.2 million on the idle held for sale facility, an increase resulting from the reversal of $1.1 million in 2011 related to a value added tax (“VAT”) in Brazil, an increase in stock compensation of $0.9 million in 2012 due to the former CEO retirement, the reversal of $0.6 million in environmental costs in 2011 and a charge for a payroll tax exposure of $0.6 million. Partially offsetting these increases was favorable currency effects of $2.9 million, the reversal of a $1.1 million contingent liability favorably resolved in 2012, a $0.7 million decrease in performance based stock compensation and management incentive compensation in 2012 due to not meeting targets and lower legal fees of $0.9 million.

Restructuring Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred restructuring and impairment expenses of $25.7 million. This amount includes costs incurred as a result of (1) the reduction of selling costs in Europe via termination of sales agency agreements, resulting in $3.6 million of restructuring costs; (2) the closure of clothing production operation in Argentina, resulting in $2.1 million of restructuring costs; (3) the closure of roll covering plant in France, resulting in $3.7 million of restructuring costs; (4) the reduction of base costs via headcount reductions primarily in Europe, resulting in $8.0 million of restructuring costs, and (6) the planned closure of clothing plant in Spain, resulting in restructuring costs of $8.3 million. Included in these costs were impairment charges of $2.5 million taken in 2012 on the Argentina, France and Spain facilities, as a result of closing those facilities. In 2011, we incurred restructuring expenses of $1.6 million as a result of restructuring activity in our North America rolls Canadian facilities. See Note 11 "Restructuring Expenses" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on these restructuring and impairment activities.

Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $1.3 million or 3.3%, to $37.9 million from $39.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This decline in interest expense reflects lower debt balances, primarily as a result of voluntary debt repayments made in 2012 and favorable currency effects. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in deferred financing cost amortization for the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to the refinancing in May 2011 and an increase in interest rates in the fourth quarter of 2012, due to the Credit Facility amendment.

Gain (loss) on Debt Extinguishment. The gain on debt extinguishment of $0.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 represents the gain realized from open market purchases of the Notes during the fourth quarter of 2012 in the principal amount of $3.6 million for an aggregate purchase price of $3.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest, net of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. See Note 5 "Long-term Debt" of the Consolidated Financial Statements and "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Credit Facility and Notes" for a further discussion on the repurchases. The loss on debt extinguishment of $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 represents the write-off of deferred financing costs resulting from the refinancing of debt that closed on May 26, 2011. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Credit Facility and Notes” for further discussion on the refinancing.

Provision for Income Taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the benefit (provision) for income taxes was $3.6 million and $(10.7) million, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily attributable to consolidated net losses driven by increased restructuring expenses, the geographic mix of earnings and the decrease of our gross uncertain tax positions in the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. Our provision for income taxes is primarily impacted by income we earn in tax paying jurisdictions relative to income we earn in non-tax paying jurisdictions. The majority of income recognized for purposes of computing our effective tax rate is earned in countries where the statutory income tax rates range from 25% to 41%; however, permanent income adjustments recorded against pre-tax earnings may result in an effective tax rate that is higher or lower than the statutory tax rate in these jurisdictions. We generate losses in certain jurisdictions for which we receive no tax benefit as the deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions (including net operating losses) are fully reserved in our valuation allowance. For this reason, we recognize minimal income tax expense or benefit in these jurisdictions, of which the most material jurisdictions are the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Due to these reserves, the geographic mix of our pre-tax earnings has a direct correlation with how high or low our annual effective tax rate is relative to consolidated earnings.

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year December 31, 2010

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $38.6 million, or 7.0%, to $586.9 million from $548.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. During 2011 and 2010, approximately 66% of our net sales were in our clothing segment and approximately 34% were in our roll covers segment.

In our clothing segment, net sales increased by $26.7 million, or 7.4%, to $386.4 million from $359.7 million compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to higher sales volume of $15.0 million, primarily in our North America and Asia-Pacific regions, and favorable currency effects of $11.7 million, partially offset by decreased sales volume in our European region.

In our roll covers segment, net sales increased by $11.9 million, or 6.3%, to $200.5 million from $188.6 million compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to higher sales volume of $7.0 million primarily in our North America and Asia-Pacific regions, and favorable currency effects of $4.9 million, partially offset by decreased sales volume in our European and South American regions.

Cost of Products Sold. Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $36.8 million, or 11.0%, to $370.8 million from $334.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In our clothing segment, cost of products sold, as a percentage of revenue, increased by 2.2% to 62.6% from 60.4% compared to the prior year. Cost of products sold increased $24.2 million or 11.2%. This increase is primarily driven by unfavorable currency effects of $9.4 million, higher sales volume resulting in increased cost of products sold of $6.1 million and unfavorable regional sales mix due to higher sales growth in regions with lower margins. In addition, fixed costs increased by $3.1 million, primarily due to the increase in depreciation, repairs and maintenance, the impact of inflation and an increase in inventory reserves.

In our roll covers segment, cost of products sold, as a percentage of revenue, increased by 2.5% to 65.5% from 63.0% compared to the prior year. Cost of products sold increased $12.6 million or 10.6%. This increase is driven by unfavorable currency effects of $2.9 million, increased sales volume resulting in increased cost of $3.1 million, increased material cost of $5.0 million, primarily due to higher purchase costs and higher sales growth in product lines with lower margins. In addition, fixed costs increased by $1.1 million.

Selling Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2011 selling expenses increased by $6.5 million, or 8.9%, to $79.4 million from $72.9 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to unfavorable currency effects of $3.1 million, $1.6 million increase in compensation and $1.5 million higher sales commissions due to higher sales volume and related costs.

General and Administrative Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2011, general and administrative expenses decreased by $12.8 million, or 17.1%, to $62.0 million from $74.8 million compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to (1) lower bank, consulting and legal fees of $9.9 million as a result of the reorganization in 2010, (2) a decrease of $4.2 million in management incentive compensation from 2010 to 2011, (3) a decrease of $3.1 million due to additional stock compensation expense recorded in 2010 as a result of the acceleration of certain performance restricted stock plans in connection with the reorganization in 2010 and a decrease in stock compensation related to various amendments to and the expected payout of certain performance stock compensation plans in 2011, (4) the reversal of $1.1 million in 2011 related to a previously accrued value added tax amount in South America as a result of a favorable ruling by the taxing authorities in 2011 and (5) a decrease of $0.8 million in environmental costs in 2011. These decreases were partially offset by unfavorable currency effects of $2.5 million and an increase in bad debt expense of $2.5 million, primarily related to a reduction in the required reserve in 2010 and specific losses related to the bankruptcies of certain customers in 2011.

Restructuring Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2011, restructuring and impairment expenses decreased by $8.4 million, or 84.0%, to $1.6 million from $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. For the most part, restructuring expenses in 2011 and 2010 resulted from our long-term strategy to reduce production costs and improve long-term competitiveness as described above under “Cost Reduction Programs” by closing and/or transferring production from certain of our manufacturing facilities and through headcount reductions. For the year ended December 31, 2011, restructuring expenses included $1.1 million related to the relocation of equipment and the wind up of the North Bay, Canada pension plan, as this facility was closed and sold in 2010 and approximately $0.8 million in various other restructuring expenses. Partially offsetting these charges was a $0.3 million gain recorded as a result of the sale of the Sherbrooke, Canada facility.

Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 decreased by $17.6 million or 31.0%, to $39.2 million from $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to $9.7 million of interest rate swaps being fully amortized at December 31, 2010, a $5.9 million lower interest expense due to lower debt balances and interest rates from 2010 to 2011, and $3.6 million lower amortization of deferred financing costs in 2011,

Table of Contents

primarily as a result of $3.9 million in amortization of the Debtor in Possession deferred financing fees in 2010 prior to the bankruptcy refinancing in 2010. These decreases were partially offset by unfavorable currency effects of $0.9 million and a decrease in interest income of $0.7 million, primarily as a result of lower balances in high-yield cash accounts in 2011.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment. The loss on debt extinguishment of $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 resulted from the refinancing of debt that closed on May 26, 2011. In 2010, as part of the reorganization, $14.4 million represented loss on debt extinguishment, and is included in reorganization expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See below for further discussion.

Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss). For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had a foreign exchange loss of $(0.2) million. For the year ended December 31, 2010 we had a foreign exchange gain of $1.7 million. Foreign exchange gains and losses are primarily the result of transactions made by an entity in their non-functional currency and hedging activities.

Reorganization Expenses. Reorganization expenses amounting to $45.0 are presented separately in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 and represent expenses that we had identified as directly relating to legal and professional fees of $16.3 million, a loss on extinguishment of debt of $14.4 million and $14.3 million related to the expenses incurred in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings in 2010. As the proceedings were completed in May of 2010, we had no reorganization expenses in 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the provision for income taxes was $10.7 million and $18.3 million, respectively. We recorded lower tax expense in 2011 as compared with 2010 principally due to non-recurring tax expense recorded in 2010 to increase our gross uncertain tax position which did not affect 2011. Our effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 was 56.6% as compared with our effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 of (33.3)%. Our effective income tax rate is primarily impacted by income we earn in tax paying jurisdictions relative to income we earn in non-tax paying jurisdictions. The majority of income recognized for purposes of computing our effective tax rate is earned in countries where the statutory income tax rates range from 25% to 41%; however, permanent income adjustments recorded against pre-tax earnings may result in an effective tax rate that is higher or lower than the statutory tax rate in these jurisdictions. We generate losses in certain jurisdictions for which we receive no tax benefit as the deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions (including net operating losses) are fully reserved in our valuation allowance. For this reason, we recognize minimal income tax expense or benefit in these jurisdictions, of which the most material jurisdictions are the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Due to these reserves, the geographic mix of our pre-tax earnings has a direct correlation with how high or low our annual effective tax rate is relative to consolidated earnings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements are for debt service, working capital and capital expenditures. We plan to use cash on hand, cash generated by operations and, should it become necessary, access to our revolving credit facility, as our primary sources of liquidity. Our operations are highly dependent upon the paper production industry and the degree to which the paper industry is affected by global economic conditions and the availability of credit. Demand for our products could decline if paper manufacturers are unable to obtain required financing or if economic conditions cause additional mill closures. In addition, the impact of the most recent global economic recession and the continued lack of availability of credit may affect our customers’ ability to pay their debts.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The $5.9 million decrease was due to reduced cash earnings, partially offset by a decrease in working capital. Net cash provided by operating activities was $45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The $24.5 million increase was due to improved cash earnings from the year ended December 31, 2010 to the year ended December 31, 2011, partially offset by an increase in working capital for that same period.

Net cash used in investing activities was $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase of $11.9 million was primarily due to the release of $13.7 million in restricted cash reserves in 2011 and the reduction in proceeds from disposals of property and equipment of $6.7 million, offset by the reduction in capital expenditures of $8.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The change of $28.8 million was primarily due to the increase of $13.7 million of restricted cash balances in 2010 as a result of the Prior Credit Facility in place at December 31, 2010 and the release of $13.7 million in 2011 to unrestricted cash balances in accordance with the Credit Facility. In addition, proceeds from the sale of fixed assets increased by $3.6 million from 2010 to 2011, primarily as a result of the sale of our Geelong, Australia facility. These increases were partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in capital equipment expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared with the same period in 2010.

Table of Contents

Net cash used in financing activities was $27.5 million and $31.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The decrease of $4.0 million was primarily the result of the decrease of $15.5 million in deferred financing costs paid from 2011 to 2012, offset by the increase of $11.5 million in principal payments made on debt in 2012. Net cash used by financing activities was $31.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and net cash provided by financing activities was $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The change of $64.1 million was primarily the result of a decrease in net proceeds from borrowings of debt of $55.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 from the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily as a result of the issuance of $60.0 million under the Exit Facility in 2010, and the payment of higher deferred financing costs of $9.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2011.

As of December 31, 2012, there was a $436.9 million balance of term loans outstanding under our Credit Facility and Notes. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, we had no outstanding borrowings under our current revolving lines of credit, including the revolving credit facility under the Credit Facility and lines of credit in various foreign countries that are used to facilitate local short-term operating needs, except that $10.5 million of the revolving credit facility is committed for letters of credit, leaving an aggregate of $19.5 million available for additional borrowings under these revolving lines of credit. In addition, in July of 2012, our Austrian subsidiary entered into a $7.7 million working capital loan with a local banking institution. This loan bears interest at a variable rate, which was 2.15% at December 31, 2012, and has a initial maturity date of June 30, 2013, with a twelve month roll-over option. We had cash and cash equivalents of $34.8 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $43.6 million at December 31, 2011.

We expect to pay approximately $10.0 million related to the continuation of our restructuring initiatives in 2013. Actual restructuring costs for 2013 may substantially differ from estimates at this time, depending on the timing of the restructuring activities.

Capital Expenditures

We use the term “capital expenditures” to refer to costs incurred to purchase or significantly upgrade property and equipment. The majority of our capital expenditures relate to purchases of machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing of our products. Capital expenditures were funded from net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our credit facility. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we had capital expenditures of $21.7 million. During 2011, we had capital expenditures of $30.2 million. During 2010, we had capital expenditures of $27.9 million. We target capital expenditures for 2013 to be $32 million. We analyze our planned capital expenditures based on investment opportunities available to us and our financial and operating performance, and accordingly, actual capital expenditures may be more or less than this amount.

See “Credit Facility and Notes” below for a description on limitations on capital expenditures imposed by our Credit Facility.

Credit Facility and Notes

On May 26, 2011, we completed a refinancing transaction, which replaced certain of our then outstanding indebtedness with $240 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”) and a new approximately $278 million multi-currency senior secured credit facility (as subsequently amended, the “Credit Facility”), comprised of approximately $248 million of senior secured term loans and a $30 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The interest rates under the Credit Facility are calculated, at our option, at the Alternate Base Rate as defined in the Credit Facility, LIBOR or EURIBOR, subject to a minimum of 2.25%, 1.25% and 1.25%, respectively, plus, in each case, a margin.

Notes

Interest on the Notes is payable semiannually in cash in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, and commenced on December 15, 2011. The Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and are guaranteed by each of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Notes Guarantors”). They rank equal in right of payment with our existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our secured debt, including the Credit Facility and related guarantees, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt and structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Notes. Subject to the terms of the Credit Facility, we may redeem the Notes at specified redemption prices which vary depending on the timing of the redemption.

The Notes contain customary covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, restrict our ability to enter into certain transactions. We are in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2012, and believe we will continue to be in compliance with these covenants in the foreseeable future.

Table of Contents

In December of 2012, we repurchased in open market transactions $3.6 million principal amount of the Notes. The aggregate purchase price, plus accrued and unpaid interest, was $3.3 million. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees, of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, The gains from the repurchases are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as "Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt."

Credit Facility

The Credit Facility provides for (i) a six-year $125.0 million senior secured term loan facility, borrowed by us, the proceeds of which were used to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness; (ii) a six-year €87.0 million senior secured term loan facility, borrowed by Xerium Technologies Limited, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of ours organized under the laws of England and Wales, the proceeds of which were used to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness; (iii) a five-year $30.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, available to us; and an uncommitted incremental amount of $10 million, the proceeds of which are used for working capital and general corporate purposes and include sub-limits available for letters of credit (the “Revolving Facility”); (iv) and an uncommitted incremental credit facility (the “Incremental Facility”) allowing for increases under the Revolving Facility and Term Loans with the same terms, and borrowing of new tranches of term loans, up to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the greater of (i) $100.0 million and (ii) our Adjusted EBITDA over the prior 12-month period, provided that increases under the Revolving Facility shall not exceed $35.0 million.

The loans under the Credit Facility are required to be permanently repaid with 100% of the net proceeds of asset sales, dispositions, issuances of certain debt obligations and insurance, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and 50% of annual excess cash flow. The Credit Facility requires us to make annual principal payments (payable in quarterly installments) equal to 1% per annum with respect to the Term Loans with the remaining amount due at final maturity.

The obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of our existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries that are organized in the United States (subject to certain exceptions in the case of immaterial subsidiaries and joint ventures) and certain of our direct and indirect foreign subsidiaries, provided that non-U.S. guarantors are only liable for obligations of Xerium Technologies Limited and certain other non-U.S. guarantors. The loans are secured by a first-priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the assets.

Credit Facility Amendment

To facilitate our restructuring initiatives, on June 28, 2012, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility. Among other revisions to the Credit Facility, the amendment allows for additional add backs to Adjusted EBITDA annually though 2015 up to the lesser of $15.0 million or the unused portion of our annual capital expenditure limit; increases the maximum leverage ratios between the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2012 and the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2013; amends the definition of the leverage ratio to reduce debt by unrestricted surplus cash held by us and increases the interest rate on the term loans by 0.75% annually for eighteen months following the effective date of the amendment. We paid $1.5 million in deferred financing costs related to the amendment.

Covenants

The Credit Facility contains customary covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, restrict our ability to enter into certain transactions and engage in certain activities. In addition, the Credit Facility includes specified financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain consolidated leverage and interest coverage ratios. The consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing our total gross debt, at average currency exchange rates for the last twelve months, less surplus cash by Adjusted EBITDA. In order to be in compliance with this covenant, as amended, we were required to have a ratio of no more than 5.50 to 1.00 at December 31, 2012. This ratio decreases after March 31, 2013 by 25-50 basis points in various periods to a minimum of 3.25 to 1.00 for the quarter ending March 31, 2017 and all subsequent periods. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by interest expense, net of mark to market movements on hedging instruments and amortization of deferred financing costs. In order to be in compliance with this covenant, we must have a ratio of at least 2.25 to 1.00 at December 31, 2012. In various periods subsequent to December 31, 2012, this ratio increases by increments of 25 basis points to 3.25 to 1.00 for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 and thereafter. Each of these covenants is calculated at the end of each quarter and is based on a rolling twelve month period. In addition, the terms of the Credit Facility limit our ability to make capital expenditures in excess of specified amounts. We are in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2012, and we believe that we will be in compliance with these covenants in the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following tables provide aggregated information about our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents



	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations (in millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Other
	(in millions)
Long-term debt obligations	$	437.1	$	2.4	$	4.9	$	193.3	$	236.5	$	—
Interest expense on long-term debt(1)	168.6		33.8		66.0		58.4		10.4		—
Operating leases	21.3		5.1		7.4		5.2		3.6		—
Purchase obligations (2)	30.8		17.4		8.1		4.9		0.4		—
Pension and other postretirement obligations	75.9		7.0		13.6		14.4		40.9		—
Net unrecognized tax benefit obligation under Topic 740 (3)	3.3				0.9						2.4
Total contractual cash obligations	$	737.0	$	65.7	$	100.9	$	276.2	$	291.8	$	2.4


(1)	Interest expense shown above is based on the effective interest rate at December 31, 2012.


(2)	Includes obligations with respect to raw material purchases, repairs and maintenance services, utilities and capital expenditures.


(3)	The amounts in “Other” represent future cash outlays for which we are unable to reasonably estimate the period of cash settlement.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we did not engage in material off-balance sheet activities, including the use of structured finance or special purpose entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We have formal accounting policies in place including those that address critical and complex accounting areas. Note 2 "Accounting Policies" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report identifies the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The most significant areas involving management judgments and estimates are described below.

Derivatives and Hedging. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted ASC Topic 815-10-65-1, Transition and Effective Date Related to FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“Topic 815-10-65-1”) for disclosure related to derivatives and hedging. Topic 815-10-65-1 amends and expands the disclosure requirements to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Topic 815-10-65-1 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.

As required by ASC Topic 815-10-65-1, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash

Table of Contents

flow hedge. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or if we elect not to apply hedge accounting under Topic 815.

We have measured our derivative assets and liabilities under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“Topic 820”), and have classified our interest rate swaps in Level 2 of the Topic 820 fair value hierarchy, as the significant inputs to the overall valuations are based on market-observable data or information derived from or corroborated by market-observable data, including market-based inputs to models, model calibration to market-clearing transactions, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value a derivative depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. We use similar models to value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, and correlations of such inputs. For our derivatives, all of which traded in liquid markets, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment.

To comply with the provisions of Topic 820, we performed a review of the necessity to incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements of our derivatives, and determined these adjustments to be immaterial to the fair value derivative assets/(liabilities) recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012.

Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We do not have any fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2012.

On August 8, 2011, we entered into two interest rate cap agreements with certain financial institutions, with notional amounts totaling $94.6 million at December 31, 2012, which limit our variable interest rate exposure to the strike rate of the interest rate cap agreements. Under the terms of the interest rate cap agreements, we will receive payments based on the spread in rates if the three-month LIBOR rate increases above the negotiated cap rates of 3.0%. The interest rate caps are considered designated hedging instruments, and classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Changes in fair value will be deferred in other comprehensive income and the cap purchase price will be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings as interest expense over the life of the agreements.

Goodwill. We account for acquired goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“Topic 805”). Purchase accounting required by Topic 805 involves judgment with respect to the valuation of the acquired assets and liabilities in order to determine the amount of goodwill. We have recorded our acquisitions in accordance with Topic 805.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets. We account for acquired goodwill and goodwill impairment in accordance with Topic 350, which requires considerable judgment in the valuation of acquired goodwill and the ongoing evaluation of goodwill impairment. Topic 350 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives not be amortized but, instead, must be tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or business conditions warrant.

We perform annual tests for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which are clothing and roll covers. When our business was acquired in 1999, more than 80% of the goodwill was assigned to the roll covers reporting unit based on relative fair values at the date of acquisition.

Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. Step 1 involves comparing the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the reporting unit carrying amount is greater than the fair value then the second step must be completed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step 2 calculates the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of the net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in Step 1. The implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.

For the purpose of performing the annual impairment test, we allocate all shared assets and liabilities to the reporting units based upon the percentage of each reporting unit’s revenue to total revenue. Shared expenses are allocated to each reporting unit to the extent necessary to allow them to operate as independent businesses. Fair value was determined by using a weighted combination of both a market multiple approach and an income approach. The market multiple approach utilizes our and our competitors’ information to determine measures that are used to value our reporting units. The income approach is a present value technique used to measure the fair value of future cash flows produced by each reporting unit. Determining the

Table of Contents

fair value of a reporting unit or an indefinite-lived purchased intangible asset is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. We believe that the assumptions and rates used in our annual impairment test under Topic 350 are reasonable, but inherently uncertain.

Based on the assessments performed as of December 31, 2012, we determined that no impairment of goodwill exists. The excess of the fair value over carrying value for our clothing and roll covers segment as of December 31, 2012, the annual test date, was approximately $54.3 million and $56.2 million, respectively. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the analysis performed, we applied a hypothetical 5% decrease to the fair value of the business segments, which resulted in a fair value in excess of carrying value of approximately $37.4 million and $46.8 million for the clothing segment and the roll covers segment, respectively.

Contingencies. We are subject to various claims and contingencies associated with lawsuits, insurance, tax, environmental and other issues arising out of the normal course of business. Our consolidated financial statements reflect the treatment of claims and contingencies based on management’s view of the expected outcome. We consult with legal counsel on those issues related to litigation with respect to matters in the ordinary course of business. If the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount is estimable, we accrue a liability in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. While we believe that the current level of reserves is adequate, the adequacy of these reserves may change in the future due to new developments in particular matters.

Income Taxes. We utilize the asset and liability method for accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“Topic 740”). Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and statutes that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations. We reduce our deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In light of our accumulated loss position in certain tax jurisdictions, and the uncertainty of taxability in future periods, we recorded a valuation allowance against all U.S. deferred tax assets and against certain of our foreign deferred tax assets primarily related to net operating loss carry-forwards in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and France.

In addition, we operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and could be subject to audit in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues and rely on estimates and assumptions. These audits may require an extended period of time to resolve and may cover multiple years. We adopted the uncertain tax provisions of Topic 740 on January 1, 2007. ASC Topic 740-10-25 relates to uncertain tax positions and prescribes a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized as it relates to uncertain tax positions. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information.

We accrue for certain known and reasonably anticipated income tax obligations after assessing the likely outcome. Although we believe that the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and recorded assets and liabilities. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2011, Xerium Technologies Brasil Indústria e Comércio S.A., a Brazilian indirect subsidiary, received a notice of proposed income tax assessment from the Federal Revenue Department of the Ministry of Finance of Brazil totaling approximately $41.8 million, including penalties and interest (subject to currency exchange rates). Although there can be no assurances, we believe at the time of this filing, that it is more likely than not that we will prevail on every tax position under examination and therefore we have not accrued any amounts related to this assessment.

With respect to all jurisdictions, we believe we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties.

We have a net deferred tax liability of $6.2 million at December 31, 2012 and $9.5 million at December 31, 2011. The net deferred tax liability relates principally to pension and post-retirement benefits, intangible assets and differences between the book and tax bases of property and equipment.

Table of Contents

Undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $107.9 million at December 31, 2012. These earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested for continued use in foreign operations except for Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. To the extent earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, no provision for income taxes or withholding taxes has been provided thereon. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise we may be subject to both income taxes and withholding taxes payable to the various jurisdictions. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability or withholding taxes is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation; however, unrecognized foreign tax credit carry-forwards and net operating loss carry-forwards would be available to reduce some portion of the liability. Federal income taxes are provided on the portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the United States and be taxable. We have not provided U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative earnings of foreign subsidiaries that we consider to be permanently reinvested. These earnings relate to on-going operations, and were approximately $46.5 million as of December 31, 2012.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Facility) as supplementary non-GAAP liquidity measures to assist us in evaluating our liquidity and financial performance, specifically our ability to service indebtedness and to fund ongoing capital expenditures. The Credit Facility includes covenants based on Adjusted EBITDA. If our Adjusted EBITDA declines below certain levels, we may violate the covenants resulting in a default condition under the Credit Facility or be required to prepay the Credit Facility. Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for income (loss) from operations or cash flows (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax provision (benefit) and depreciation (including non-cash impairment charges) and amortization.

“Adjusted EBITDA”, under the Credit Facility means, with respect to any period, the total of (A) the consolidated net income for such period, plus (B) without duplication, to the extent that any of the following were deducted in computing such consolidated net income for such period: (i) provision for taxes based on income or profits, including, without limitation, federal, state, provincial, franchise and similar taxes, including any penalties and interest relating to any tax examinations, (ii) consolidated interest expense, (iii) consolidated depreciation and amortization expense, (iv) reserves for inventory in connection with plant closures, (v) consolidated operational restructuring costs, (vi) non-cash charges or gains resulting from the application of purchase accounting, including push-down accounting, (vii) non-cash expenses resulting from the granting of common stock, stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards under equity compensation programs solely with respect to common stock, and cash expenses for compensation mandatorily applied to purchase common stock, (viii) non-cash items relating to a change in or adoption of accounting policies, (ix) non-cash expenses relating to pension or benefit arrangements, (x) expenses incurred as a result of the repurchase, redemption or retention of common stock earned under equity compensation programs solely in order to make withholding tax payments, (xi) amortization or write-offs of deferred financing costs, (xii) any non-cash losses resulting from mark to market hedging obligations (to the extent the cash impact resulting from such loss has not been realized in such period) and (xiii) other non-cash losses or charges (excluding, however, any non-cash loss or charge which represents an accrual of, or a reserve for, a cash disbursement in a future period), minus (C) without duplication, to the extent any of the following were included in computing consolidated net income for such period, (i) non-cash gains with respect to the items described in clauses (vi), (vii), (ix), (xi), (xii) and (xiii) (other than, in the case of clause (xiii), any such gain to the extent that it represents a reversal of an accrual of, or reserve for, a cash disbursement in a future period) of clause (B) above and (ii) provisions for tax benefits based on income or profits. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility and calculated below, may not be comparable to similarly titled measurements used by other companies.

Consolidated net income is defined as net income (loss) determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided, however, that the following, without duplication, shall be excluded in determining consolidated net income: (i) any net after-tax extraordinary or non-recurring gains, losses or expenses (less all fees and expenses relating thereto), (ii) the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, (iii) any fees and expenses incurred during such period in connection with the issuance or repayment of indebtedness, any refinancing transaction or amendment or modification of any debt instrument, in each case, as permitted under the Credit Facility and (iv) any gains resulting from the returned surplus assets of any pension plan.

The following table provides reconciliation from net (loss) income and operating cash flows, which are the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

Table of Contents



	Year ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Net (loss) income	$	(18,035	)	$	8,190		$	(73,086	)
Stock-based compensation	1,949			1,439			7,310
Depreciation	38,533			41,381			38,963
Amortization of intangibles	2,305			2,305			2,318
Curtailment/settlement loss	—			402			—
Deferred financing cost amortization	3,424			2,307			5,953
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain) on revaluation of debt	582			139			(1,621		)
Deferred taxes	(8,249		)	334			8,614
Gain on disposition of property and equipment	(576		)	(564		)	(2,105		)
Asset impairment	3,674			—			2,890
Non-cash interest expense related to interest rate swaps	—			—			9,721
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt	(243		)	2,926			—
Non-cash reorganization items	—			—			28,683
Reorganization expenses accrued	—			—			115
Net change in operating assets and liabilities	15,958			(13,651		)	(7,021		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	39,322			45,208			20,734
Interest expense, excluding amortization	34,455			36,843			41,121
Net change in operating assets and liabilities	(15,958		)	13,653			7,021
Current portion of income tax expense	4,687			10,343			9,652
Stock-based compensation	(1,949		)	(1,439		)	(7,310		)
Curtailment/settlement loss	—			(402		)	—
Asset impairment	(3,674		)	—			(2,890		)
Unrealized foreign exchange (loss) gain on revaluation of debt	(582		)	(139		)	1,621
Gain on disposition of property and equipment	576			564			2,105
Non-cash reorganization expenses	—			—			(28,798		)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt	243			(2,926		)	—
EBITDA	57,120			101,705			43,256
Financial restructuring costs (1)	—			—			26,197
Operational restructuring expenses	25,708			1,589			7,114
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt (2)	(243		)	2,926			14,283
Expenses incurred in connection with indebtedness or refinancing transaction	115			—			14,400
Stock-based compensation	1,949			1,439			7,310
Non-recurring CEO transition expenses	3,385			—			—
Non-cash impairment charges	1,195			—			2,890
Non-cash change in accounting estimates	—			—			(1,400		)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	89,229		$	107,659		$	114,050

(1)

Financial restructuring costs are not adjustments under the definition of Adjusted EBITDA in the Credit Facility to arrive at Adjusted EBITDA for periods beginning after the quarter ended June 30, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2010, as applicable, such items were added back to Adjusted EBITDA based upon the terms of the Prior Credit Facility. Had these adjustments not been in place in 2010, Adjusted EBITDA would have decreased by $26.2 million.


(2)	In the year ended December 31, 2010, the $14.3 million was included in reorganization expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.



ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The effects of potential changes in interest rates and foreign currency rates are discussed below. Our market risk discussion includes “forward-looking statements” and represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value or future

Table of Contents

earnings that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in interest rates and foreign currency rates. Actual future results may differ materially from those presented. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our accounting policies and other information related to these financial instruments.

Foreign Currency Hedging

We have foreign currency cash flow and earnings exposure with respect to specific sale and intercompany debt transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the unit incurring the costs associated with such transactions. To mitigate the risks related to these exposures, we utilize forward currency contracts in certain circumstances, to lock in exchange rates with the objective that the gain or loss on the forward contracts will approximate the loss or gain on the transaction or transactions being hedged. We determine whether to enter into hedging arrangements based upon the size of the underlying transaction or transactions, an assessment of the risk of adverse movements in the applicable currencies and the availability of a cost-effective hedging strategy. In South America, substantially all of our net sales are indexed to U.S. Dollars, but the associated costs are recorded in the local currencies of the operating units. Generally, we do not hedge this U.S. Dollar exposure as it would not be cost effective due to the relatively inefficient foreign exchange markets for local currencies in that region. To the extent we do not engage in hedging or such hedging is not effective, changes in the relative value of currencies can affect our profitability.

The value of these contracts is recognized at fair value based on market exchange forward rates and amounted to a net asset position of $357,000 at December 31, 2012. These contracts mature at various dates through June of 2013.

As of December 31, 2012, we had open foreign currency exchange contracts maturing through June of 2013 with total net notional amounts of approximately $14.3 million. At December 31, 2012, a hypothetical adverse exchange rate movement of 10% against our forward foreign exchange contracts would have resulted in a potential net loss in fair value of these contracts of approximately $1.4 million. The calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. Dollar. Any gain or loss recognized on a foreign exchange contract would generally be offset by the gain or loss on the underlying hedge transaction. In addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates, such changes may affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors’ products become more or less attractive. Our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices.

For additional information about the risks associated with fluctuations in currency exchange rates, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Foreign Exchange.”

Interest Rate Hedging

We borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our debt consists of a secured credit facility with variable interest rates and unsecured notes which bear interest at fixed rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time we enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We generally do not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

At December 31, 2012, we had approximately $201 million of variable rate debt outstanding of which $95 million is protected by interest rate caps. See Note 6 "Derivatives and Hedging" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on our interest rate caps. If the weighted average interest rates on this variable rate debt had been 100 basis points higher, the annual interest expense would have increased by a nominal amount.



ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

All financial statements required to be filed under this Item 8, other than selected quarterly financial data, are filed as Appendix A hereto, are listed under Item 15(a) and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Selected quarterly financial data are included under Item 6 and are incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

Table of Contents



ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2012, under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and with the participation of our management, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. No evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that these controls and procedures will operate effectively under all circumstances. However, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level as set forth above.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making its assessment, management has utilized the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Our management concluded that based on its assessment, our internal control over financial reporting was effective as

of December 31, 2012. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued its report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which appears in this 2012 Form 10-K.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Xerium Technologies, Inc.

We have audited Xerium Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Criteria). Xerium Technologies, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Xerium Technologies, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Xerium Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, and our report dated March 11, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 11, 2013



ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III



ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE