Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

​

Palomar Holdings, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

PALOMAR HOLDINGS, INC.

7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500

La Jolla, California 92037

Dear Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Palomar Holdings, Inc. (“Palomar”), which will be held at the Palomar offices, located at 7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500, La Jolla, California 92037 on May 27, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Doors open at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time.

At the Annual Meeting, we will ask you to consider the following proposals:

Stockholders of record as of April 1, 2021 may vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.

We are pleased to announce that we are taking advantage of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. We believe that this process will allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a timely manner, reduce the environmental impact of printing and distributing our proxy materials and lower our costs.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to submit your vote via the Internet, telephone or, if you requested a printed copy of the proxy materials, via mail. Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Therefore, I urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy via the Internet, by phone, or, if you requested a printed copy of the proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have previously submitted your proxy.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation of your interest in Palomar.

Sincerely,

Mac Armstrong

Chief Executive Officer

La Jolla, California

April 16, 2021

​

​

​

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

​

This notice of our Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the accompanying proxy statement and form of proxy are being distributed and made available on or about April 16, 2021.

​

​

Table of Contents

Although we currently intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we are actively monitoring the public health and travel safety concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the advisories or mandates that federal, state, and local governments may issue. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor any public announcements and our investor relations website at https://ir.plmr.com/ for updated information. If you are planning to attend our Annual Meeting, please check any public announcements that we may make and the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

​

​

​

Table of Contents

​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

For 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on May 27, 2021

This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Palomar Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Palomar”) for use at its 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on May 27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, at our principal executive offices located at 7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500 La Jolla, California 92037.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this proxy statement. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. The person you designate is your “proxy,” and you give the proxy authority to vote your shares by voting by telephone or over the Internet, or, if you requested a printed copy of the proxy materials, by submitting the enclosed proxy card. We have designated our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mac Armstrong, to serve as proxy for the Annual Meeting.

Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the Internet instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of the proxy materials to each stockholder. On or about April 16, 2021, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 via the Internet and how to vote your proxy. If you received the Notice, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of our proxy materials in the mail. If you would like to receive a printed copy, please follow the instructions provided in the Notice.

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Palomar is making available these proxy materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at Palomar’s Annual Meeting, which will take place on May 27, 2021. Stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

What information is contained in these materials?

The information included in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of our most highly paid executive officers and our directors, and certain other required information. Palomar’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements, is also furnished with this proxy statement.

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting include:

1

Table of Contents

At the time this proxy statement was filed with the SEC, our management and Board were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this proxy statement and in the notice accompanying this proxy statement.

How does our Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote:

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on April 1, 2021, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were 25,588,550 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. The shares you are entitled to vote include shares that are (1) held of record directly in your name, and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent, then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individual listed on the form of proxy card or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, then you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker, bank or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or

2

Table of Contents

other nominee may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to routine matters but may not vote your shares with respect to any non-routine matters. Please see “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” for additional information.

How can I contact Palomar’s transfer agent?

Contact our transfer agent by either writing to Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000 by telephoning (800) 736-3001 or (781) 575-3100, or via its Investor Center at www.computershare.com/investor.

Do I have to do anything in advance if I plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date, you do not need to do anything in advance to attend and/or vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, but you will need to present government-issued photo identification for entrance to the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you were a beneficial owner at the close of business on the Record Date, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee who is the stockholder of record with respect to your shares. You may still attend the Annual Meeting even if you do not have a legal proxy. For entrance to the Annual Meeting, you will need to provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as the notice or voting instructions you received from your broker, bank or other nominee or a brokerage statement reflecting your ownership of shares as of the Record Date, and present government-issued photo identification.

Please note that no cameras, recording equipment, large bags, briefcases, or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.

We are actively monitoring the public health and travel safety concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the advisories or mandates that federal, state, and local governments may issue. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor our public announcements and our investor relations website at https://ir.plmr.com/ for updated information. If you are planning to attend our Annual Meeting, please check any of our public announcements and the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

Will the annual meeting be webcast?

We do not expect to webcast the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote in one of the following ways:

3

Table of Contents

Please note that the Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 PM Pacific Time on May 26, 2021.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held of record by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee in order to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares. The availability of Internet and telephone voting options will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank, or other nominee. As discussed above, if you are a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must contact the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares and follow their instructions to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the Annual Meeting and for ten days prior to the meeting for any purpose germane to the meeting, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time, at our corporate headquarters at 7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500, La Jolla, California 92037, by contacting our corporate secretary.

4

Table of Contents

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board. The person named in the proxy has been designated as proxy holder by our Board. The shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holder will use his own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holder can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, then your broker, bank or other nominee will determine if it has discretion to vote on each matter. Brokers do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters. Proposals No. 1 (election of directors), No. 2 (Say-on-Pay-Vote) and No.3 (Say-on-Frequency-Vote) are non-routine matters, while Proposal No. 4 (ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm) is a routine matter. As a result, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to Proposals No. 1, 2 or 3, which would result in “broker non-votes,” but may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to Proposal No. 4. For additional information regarding broker non-votes, see “What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?” below.

What is a quorum?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. A majority of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock and entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, present in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. As noted above, as of the Record Date, there were a total of 25,588,550 shares of common stock outstanding, which means that 12,794,276 shares of common stock must be represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum. If there is no quorum, a majority of the shares present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.

What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?

An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. If a stockholder indicates that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its

5

Table of Contents

customers’ shares of record causes abstentions to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As a result, abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum and will also count as votes against a proposal in cases where approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (e.g., Proposal No. 2). However, because the outcome of Proposal No. 1 (election of directors) will be determined by a plurality vote, abstentions will have no impact on the outcome of such proposal as long as a quorum exists. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast. Therefore, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily attainable but will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on any proposal.

What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

​

Proposal No. 1: Election of two nominees for Class II directors named in this proxy statement to hold office until our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

The election of the directors requires a plurality vote of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. “Plurality” means that the nominees who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. You may (i) vote FOR all nominees, (ii) WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, or (iii) vote FOR all nominees except for those specific nominees from whom you WITHHOLD your vote. Any shares not voted FOR a particular nominee (whether as a result of voting withheld or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominees’ favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election. If you WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, you will be deemed to have abstained from voting on Proposal No. 1, and such abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

Proposal No. 2: Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement.

The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as set forth in this proxy statement requires the vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 2, the abstention will have the same effect as

6

Table of Contents

a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered as present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote for this proposal.

Proposal No. 3: Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on Named Executive Officers’ compensation.

The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on Named Executive Officers’ compensation, votes for “One Year,” “Two Years,” or “Three Years.” Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast, and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote totals for any of the three options available to stockholders.

Proposal No. 4: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 4, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

Who will count the votes?

A representative of our mailing agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate the votes and Chris Uchida, our Chief Financial Officer, will act as inspector of elections.

How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?

Our Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting by means of the proxy materials. We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokers, banks and other nominees to forward to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such brokers, banks or other nominees. The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communication, or other means by our directors, officers, employees or agents. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within Palomar or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the Notice. How may I obtain an additional copy of the Notice?

7

Table of Contents

We have adopted an SEC-approved procedure called “householding,” under which we can deliver a single copy of the Notice to multiple stockholders who share the same address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice, and if applicable, the proxy materials, to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these documents. To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year’s Notice, you may contact us as follows:

​

​

Stockholders who hold shares in street name may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other nominee to request information about householding.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K (“Form 8-K”) that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us at that time, we intend to file a Form 8-K with the SEC to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an amendment to the Form 8-K to publish the final results.

What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?

Stockholder Proposals

Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than December 17, 2021. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials.

​

​

Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board, or (iii) properly brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our bylaws. To be timely for our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:

8

Table of Contents

In the event that we hold our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the first anniversary of the date of the Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.

Nomination of Director Candidates

You may propose director candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our Board and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board.”

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.

Availability of Bylaws

A copy of our bylaws may be obtained by accessing our public filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also contact our Secretary at our principal executive office for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

​

9

Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our business affairs are managed under the direction of our Board, which is currently comprised of six members, five of which are “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards.

The Board is nominating two nominees for election as Class II directors. Our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring. Our board of directors has nominated Catriona M. Fallon and Richard H. Taketa for election at the Annual Meeting, each to serve as Class II directors until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

The following charts set forth the ages, ethnic diversity, gender diversity and independence status of our Board as of April 1, 2021.

The table below details certain information for each of the nominees, the non-continuing directors whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting and the directors whose terms do not expire at the Annual Meeting.

​

I = Independent

N = Not independent

10

Table of Contents

Nominees for Director

for a term expiring at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders

Catriona M. Fallon

Ms. Fallon has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2019. She also serves on the Board of Directors for General Fusion, a Canadian company which is pursuing the fastest and most practical path to commercial fusion energy. Until November 2020, Ms. Fallon served as the Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Hitachi Vantara, a digital solutions, services, and infrastructure company. Ms. Fallon previously served as General Manager and Senior Vice President of the Networks Segment of Itron, Inc., a utilities technology company and had previously been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Silver Spring Networks until Itron’s acquisition of the Company in 2018. Previously, Ms. Fallon served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Marin Software Incorporated, a software-as-as-service enterprise marketing solutions company. Prior to joining Marin Software, Ms. Fallon was the Vice President of Finance and Chief of Staff to the Chief Financial Officer at Cognizant Technology Solutions, a business and technology services company. Ms. Fallon’s experience also includes nearly five years at Hewlett-Packard Company, where she held several leadership positions including Vice President of Strategy and Financial Planning, Director of Investor Relations, and Director of Strategy and Corporate Development. She has also served as an equity analyst covering media and technology companies at Citigroup Investment Research and has held roles with Piper Jaffray & Company, McKinsey & Company, and Oracle Corporation. Ms. Fallon previously served on the Board of Directors of Cray Inc. (NASDAQ: CRAY), as well as the Audit Committee and Strategic Technology Assessment Committee of Cray Inc. until its acquisition by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Ms. Fallon received a B.A. in Economics from UCLA and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. We believe that Ms. Fallon’s experiences as a senior finance executive, including as the Chief Financial Officer of other publicly traded technology companies, qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors.

Richard H. Taketa

Mr. Taketa has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2019 and on the Board of Directors of our insurance subsidiaries since October 2018. Mr. Taketa serves as President of Taketa Capital Corporation, where he has worked since September 2018. Previously, Mr. Taketa served as Chief Executive Officer and President of York Risk Services Group, Inc., from January 2014 through September 2018, previously holding the positions of Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, and President at numerous York divisions and subsidiaries since 2006. Prior to joining York, Mr. Taketa served as the Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Risk Management Associates and an associate at DLA Piper LLP. In addition, Mr. Taketa serves on the Board of Directors of Veritone, Inc. (Nasdaq: VERI), and several private companies. Mr. Taketa earned his B.A. in Economics from Colgate University and his J.D. from Stanford Law School. We believe Mr. Taketa is qualified to serve on our Board due to his executive and insurance industry experience, as well as his experience as a director of numerous private companies.

Continuing Directors

Class I Directors with a term expiring at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders

Daryl Bradley

Mr. Bradley has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2020 and on the Board of Directors of our insurance subsidiaries since June 2020. From 1995 to 2018, Mr. Bradley held various roles at Everest Reinsurance Company, a reinsurance and insurance company, most recently serving as Executive Vice President and Head of International Insurance from February 2015 to January 2018 and, prior to that, as Executive Vice President and President of Insurance Operations, Chairman of Everest Insurance Company of Canada, and President and Board member of all of Everest’s statutory primary insurance companies from August 2007 to February 2015. Prior to joining Everest, Mr. Bradley served several roles at Continental Insurance Corporation from 1992 to 1995 and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company from 1982 to 1992. Mr. Bradley earned his B.A. in

11

Table of Contents

Political Science from the University of Chicago. We believe Mr. Bradley is qualified to serve on our Board because his management experience in the insurance and reinsurance industry brings valuable industry knowledge and practical experience to our Board.

Robert E. Dowdell

Mr. Dowdell has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2019 and on the Board of Directors of our insurance subsidiaries since October 2018. Mr. Dowdell founded Career Education Corporation and served as its Chief Executive Officer and President from September 2006 to March 2007, as a Board Member from 1994 until 2008, and its Chairman of the Board from 2004 until March 2008. Previously, Mr. Dowdell served as Chief Executive Officer of Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC, President of National Education Centers, Corporate Controller of National Education Corp and Chamberlain Manufacturing Corp, and as an Audit Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Dowdell is a Certified Public Accountant in California and Illinois. Mr. Dowdell currently serves on the Boards of a number of private companies. Mr. Dowdell earned his B.B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Notre Dame. We believe Mr. Dowdell is qualified to serve on our Board due to his more than 30 years of leadership and management experience in various insurance servicing firms and other institutions, as well as previous Corporate Controller and Audit Committee responsibilities for both public and private firms.

Class III Directors with a term expiring at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders

Mac Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a Director since February 2014 and Chairman of our Board of Directors since June 2020. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Armstrong served as the President of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, which he joined in June 2009, previously holding the positions of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Armstrong led the sale of Arrowhead to Brown & Brown, Inc. in January 2012. Mr. Armstrong’s prior experience includes Spectrum Equity Investors, a private equity investment firm where he led the insurance investing practice and Alex. Brown & Sons/ BT Alex. Brown Inc., an investment bank acquired by Deutsche Bank. Mr. Armstrong earned an A.B. from Princeton University. Mr. Armstrong is a member of the Board of Advisors of Cloverlay Investment Management LLC, a private equity investment firm and a member of the Board of Trustees of the Bishop’s School. We believe Mr. Armstrong is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive experience leading insurance companies and his industry knowledge.

Martha Notaras

Ms. Notaras has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2020. Ms. Notaras is Managing Partner at Brewer Lane Ventures, investing in early stage insurtech and fintech companies. Ms. Notaras serves on the Boards of Cowbell Cyber, an artificial intelligence-driven cyber managing general agent; Lynk, which uses artificial intelligence to deliver its knowledge as a service platform; and Cape Analytics, which delivers highly accurate property data derived from imagery via machine learning. Prior to joining Brewer Lane Ventures, Ms. Notaras was Partner at XL Innovate, investing in early stage insurtechs, including Lemonade, which had a successful initial public offering in 2020. Previously, Ms. Notaras ran corporate development for the business analytics division of the Daily Mail, where she acquired 20 companies, including insurtech pioneer Risk Management Solutions. Ms. Notaras has served as Board Director for many early and growth stage companies focusing on fintech, insurtech, proptech, edtech and digital media. Ms. Notaras’s prior experience includes investment banking at Merrill Lynch and commercial banking at Credit Suisse. Ms. Notaras earned her A.B. Cum Laude from Princeton University and her MBA from Harvard Business School, where she was a Baker Scholar, awarded for graduating in the top five percent of the class. We believe Ms. Notaras is qualified to serve on our Board due to her extensive experience working with emerging private and public companies.

12

Table of Contents

Director Independence

Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each current director in accordance with the Nasdaq Marketplace rules, and determined that each of Mss. Fallon and Notaras and Messrs. Bradley, Dowdell, and Taketa, representing five of our six continuing Directors, is “Independent” as that term is defined under the rules of Nasdaq. In addition, Mss. Fallon and Notaras and Messrs. Bradley, Dowdell, and Taketa are Non-Employee Directors, as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.

Our Board also determined that Ms. Fallon (Chairperson), Mr. Bradley, Mr. Dowdell and Ms. Notaras, who currently comprise our Audit Committee, satisfy the listing standards of Nasdaq and the SEC for service on our Audit Committee. Our Board also determined that Mr. Taketa (Chairperson), Mr. Bradley and Ms. Notaras, who currently serve on our Compensation Committee, satisfy the independence standards for compensation committees established by SEC rules and the listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board has also determined that Mr. Dowdell (Chairperson), Ms. Fallon and Mr. Taketa, who currently serve on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, satisfy the independence standards for nominating committees established by applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of Nasdaq.

In evaluating the independence of Mss. Fallon and Notaras and Messrs. Bradley, Dowdell, and Taketa, the Board considered their current and historical employment, any compensation we have given to them, any transactions we have with them, their beneficial ownership of our capital stock, their ability to exert control over us, all other material relationships they have had with us and the same facts with respect to their immediate family. The Board also considered all other relevant facts and circumstances known to it in making this independence determination.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structure so as to provide effective oversight of management. Our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines provide our Board of Directors with flexibility to combine or separate the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors currently believes that our existing leadership structure, under which Mac Armstrong serves as our Chief Executive Officer and as our Chairman of the Board, is effective.

Board Meetings and Committees

During 2020, our Board held seven meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our Board held during the period for which he or she served as a Director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all Committees of our Board on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

It is the policy of our Board to regularly have separate meeting times for Independent Directors without management. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend.

Our Board currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and an Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance Committee. Each committee has the composition and responsibilities described below.

13

Table of Contents

Audit Committee

The members of our Audit Committee are Catriona M. Fallon (Chairperson), Daryl Bradley, Robert E. Dowdell and Martha Notaras. All members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Our Board of Directors has determined that Catriona M. Fallon is an Audit Committee financial expert as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. Among other matters, the Audit Committee:

14

Table of Contents

Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our Audit Committee is available on our website at www.plmr.com in the Corporate Governance section of our Investors webpage. During 2020, our Audit Committee held seven meetings.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Taketa (Chairperson), Mr. Bradley and Ms. Notaras. Our Compensation Committee reviews and recommends policies relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and employees. Among other matters, the Compensation Committee:

Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our Compensation Committee is available on our website at www.plmr.com in the Corporate Governance section of our Investors webpage. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during 2020.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our Compensation Committee during the last fiscal year (which includes Mr. Taketa (Chairperson), Mr. Bradley and Ms. Notaras) is or has at any time been an officer or employee of ours. None of our Executive Officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Mr. Dowdell (Chairperson), Ms. Fallon and Mr. Taketa. The principal duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are as follows:

15

Table of Contents

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the listing standards of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is available on our website at www.plmr.com in the Corporate Governance section of our Investors webpage. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during 2020.

Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance Committee

In October 2020, our Board established an Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (“ESG”) Committee that consists of Ms. Notaras (Chairperson), Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Bradley. The principal duties and responsibilities of the ESG Committee are as follows:

Our ESG Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our website at www.plmr.com in the Corporate Governance section of our Investors webpage. There were no meetings held by the ESG Committee during 2020.

16

Table of Contents

Sustainability & Citizenship Report and Commitment to Diversity, Equality and Inclusion

In December 2020, we published our inaugural Sustainability & Citizenship Report. This report is part of our commitment to exceeding traditional ESG standards and outlines meaningful steps the Company has taken to address a range of issues, including climate change, diversity, equality and inclusion, economic and social justice matters, while maintaining a compassionate workplace. A copy of our 2020 Sustainability & Corporate Citizenship Report can be found on our website at http://www.plmr.com under the “About” section. A few highlights from the report are as follows:

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee use the following procedures to identify and evaluate any individual recommended or offered for nomination to the Board:

●     any specific minimum qualifications that it believes must be met by a nominee for a position on the Board;

●     any specific qualities or skills that it believes are necessary for one or more of the Board members to possess and

●     the desired qualifications, expertise, experience, and characteristics of Board members, with the goal of developing an experienced and highly qualified Board.

For Board membership, the criteria considered includes independence, diversity of experience, demonstrated leadership, and the ability to exercise sound judgment. The backgrounds and qualifications of the directors considered as a group should provide a significant breadth of experience, knowledge and abilities that shall assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities. Although there is no specific policy regarding diversity in identifying

17

Table of Contents

director nominees, both the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board seek the talents and backgrounds that would be most helpful to us in selecting director nominees. In particular, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, when recommending director candidates to the full Board of Directors for nomination, may consider whether a director candidate, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of Board of Directors members that represents a diversity of background and experience.

Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board

A stockholder that wishes to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Committee as a potential candidate for director must direct the recommendation in writing to Palomar Holdings, Inc., 7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500, La Jolla, California 92037, Attention: Secretary, and must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, class and number of shares of our capital stock that are held by the nominee, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between us and the candidate and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of our stock. Such recommendation must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for board membership, including issues of character, integrity, judgment, and diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like and personal references. Our Board will consider the recommendation but will not be obligated to take any further action with respect to the recommendation.

Communications with the Board of Directors

In cases where stockholders and other interested parties wish to communicate directly with our non-management directors, messages can be sent to our Secretary, at Palomar Holdings, Inc., 7979 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 500, La Jolla, California 92037, Attention: Secretary. Our Secretary monitors these communications and will provide a summary of all received messages to the Board at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. Our Board generally meets on a quarterly basis. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our Secretary may determine, in his or her judgment, to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate Committee of the Board or non-management director, of independent advisors or of Company management, as our Secretary considers appropriate.

Our Secretary may decide in the exercise of his or her judgment whether a response to any stockholder or interested party communication is necessary.

This procedure for stockholder and other interested party communications with the non-management directors is administered by the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. This procedure does not apply to:

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct and Ethics

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. These principles address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that

18

Table of Contents

applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.plmr.com in the Corporate Governance section of our Investors webpage. We intend to post any amendments to our Code of Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers of our Code of Conduct and Ethics for directors and executive officers, on the same website within four business days of such amendment or waiver.

Board Oversight of Risk

Although management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks our company faces, our Board and its committees take an active role in overseeing management of our risks and have the ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management. The Board regularly reviews information regarding our operational, financial, legal and strategic risks. Specifically, senior management attends quarterly meetings of the Board, provides presentations on operations including significant risks, and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by our Board.

In addition, our four Committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding risk. The Audit Committee coordinates the Board of Director’s oversight of our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, related party transactions and code of conduct and corporate governance guidelines and management will regularly report to the Audit Committee on these areas. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs as well as succession planning as it relates to our Chief Executive Officer. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and corporate governance. The Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with environmental, health and safety, corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, sustainability, and other public matters relevant to the Company. When any of the committees receives a report related to material risk oversight, the chairman of the relevant committee will report on the discussion to the full Board of Directors.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations to us, we believe that for fiscal 2020, all filing requirements applicable to the Company’s officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, were complied with, except that (i) one grant of stock options granted to Jon Christianson on July 30, 2020 was filed after its Form 4 due date due to an administrative error and (ii) one grant of stock options granted to Angela Grant on November 30, 2020 was filed after its Form 4 due date due to an administrative error.

Director Compensation

We did not have a formal compensation program for our Non-Employee Directors during 2020.

In October 2020, we adopted a formal non-employee director compensation program that will become effective January 1, 2021. The purpose of this compensation program is to attract and retain independent, qualified candidates to serve on the Board by providing competitive compensation and aligning the interest of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders through long-term equity incentives. The Board makes all director compensation determinations after considering the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews director

19

Table of Contents

compensation annually, assisted periodically by its independent compensation consultant (most recently by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) in July 2020).

In setting director compensation, we consider various factors including market comparison studies and trends, the responsibilities of directors generally, including committee chairs, and the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties. In establishing the non-employee director compensation recommendations, the Compensation Committee utilized a balance of cash and equity, with the majority of the compensation delivered through equity grants. Directors who also serve as employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for service as directors. Elements of 2021 Director Compensation will be as follows:

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our Non-Employee Directors for service on our Board of Directors and the board of directors of our subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2020. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. Thus, Mr. Armstrong’s compensation as a Named Executive Officer is discussed in the section “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion & Analysis”.

​

20

Table of Contents

2020 Director Compensation Table

​

​

21

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Under our governing documents, our Board has the power to set the number of directors from time to time by resolution. We currently have six authorized directors serving on our Board, of which five directors are “Independent” as defined under Nasdaq listing standards. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our Board may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our company.

At the Annual Meeting, two Class II directors will be elected for three-year terms. Based upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board has nominated Catriona M. Fallon and Richard H. Taketa to stand for re-election by our stockholders, in each case for a three-year term expiring at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

Nominees for Director

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and our Board has approved, Catriona M. Fallon and Richard H. Taketa as nominees for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting.

If elected, Catriona M. Fallon and Richard H. Taketa will serve as Class II directors until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. For information concerning the nominees, please see the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote over the Internet or by telephone but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the election of Ms. Fallon and Mr. Taketa. We expect that Ms. Fallon and Mr. Taketa will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by our Board to fill such vacancy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, then your broker, bank or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.

Vote Required

The election of the Class II directors requires a plurality of the votes cast by stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting thereon to be approved. Broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS NOMINATED BY OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AS CLASS II DIRECTORS TO SERVE FOR THREE-YEAR TERMS.

​

22

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COMPENSATION (“SAY-ON-PAY-VOTE”)

We are asking our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (which consist of our Chief Executive Office and our next two highest paid executives) as described in detail in the section of this Proxy Statement titled “Executive Compensation.” We urge stockholders to carefully read the “2020 Summary Compensation Table” and related compensation tables that follow it.

Our executive compensation program utilizes a pay for performance approach. Our executive compensation program is designed to deliver compensation in accordance with Company performance with a large percentage of compensation at risk through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive awards. These awards are “at risk” and linked to Company performance, consistent with our belief that a significant amount of executive compensation should be in the form of equity and that an even greater percentage of compensation should be tied to performance for executives who bear higher levels of responsibility for our performance. Approximately 67% of our CEO’s 2020 total direct compensation, and approximately 58% of the average 2020 total direct compensation of our other Named Executive Officers, was at-risk, consisting of annual bonus, stock options and RSUs. As 2020 was a transition year from us being privately controlled to being an independent public company, the equity awards in the charts below include one-time equity awards due to not having an annual grant cycle established during the fiscal year. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has engaged an independent global executive compensation consulting firm, PwC, to advise the Committee on matters related to executive compensation.

Our Board and the Compensation Committee believe that the compensation policies and procedures described in this Proxy Statement are effective in achieving our compensation objectives. Therefore, in accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we ask our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Offices, as described in “Executive Compensation- Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables notes in this Proxy Statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders.

Vote Required

The approval of the Named Executive Officers compensation requires the affirmative vote of majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Broker non-votes will not be considered as present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote for this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

​

23

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 3
FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTE ON
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

We are asking our stockholders to vote, on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on our executive compensation programs, such as Proposal No. 2. In particular, we are asking whether the advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive Officers should occur every “one year”, “two years” or “three years”.

Say-On-Pay Frequency

Stockholders may vote for every “one year”, “two years” or “three years” with respect to this proposal or may abstain from voting.

After careful consideration, our Board of Directors believes that submitting the advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis is appropriate for our Company and its stockholders at this time. We view the advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive Officers as an additional, but not the only, opportunity for our stockholders to communicate with us regarding their views on our executive compensation programs. Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that the advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers be held every year.

Vote Required

This vote is advisory and non-binding on our Company or the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote, however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. Notwithstanding our Board’s recommendation and the outcome of the stockholder vote, our Board may in the future decide to conduct advisory votes on a more or less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on factors such as discussion with stockholders and the adoption of material changes to our compensation programs.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR FREQUENCY OF “ONE YEAR” FOR PROPOSAL NO. 3.

​

24

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 4
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Ratification of Appointment

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, our Board is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, such appointment will be reconsidered by our Audit Committee. Even if the appointment is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 if our Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Palomar and its stockholders. If the appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she wishes to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to us by Ernst & Young LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

​

Auditor Independence

In 2020, there were no other professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP that would have required our Audit Committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP.

25

Table of Contents

Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, our Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair such accounting firm’s independence. All fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires the affirmative vote of majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR OUR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021.

​

26

Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in the following Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Palomar Holdings, Inc., or the Company, specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

The Audit Committee serves as the representative of the Board with respect to its oversight of:

The Audit Committee also reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, in the annual audit of our financial statements and in assignments unrelated to the audit and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees.

The members of the Audit Committee are currently Catriona M. Fallon (Chairperson), Daryl Bradley, Robert E. Dowdell and Martha Notaras. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” as currently defined in the applicable Nasdaq and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that Ms. Fallon is an “Audit Committee financial expert” as described in applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

The Audit Committee provides our Board such information and materials as it may deem necessary to make our Board aware of financial matters requiring the attention of our Board. The Audit Committee reviews our financial disclosures and meets privately, outside the presence of our management, with our independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our 2020 Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality and substance of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made in connection with the audited financial statements, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee reports on these meetings to our Board.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees).

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence.

27

Table of Contents

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee also has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. The Board recommends that stockholders ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the board of directors:

Catriona M. Fallon (Chair)
Daryl Bradley

Robert E. Dowdell

Martha Notaras

​

28

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of April 1, 2021. Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our Board and holds office until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

​

Mac Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a Director since February 2014 and Chairman of our Board of Directors since June 2020. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Armstrong served as the President of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, which he joined in June 2009, previously holding the positions of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Armstrong led the sale of Arrowhead to Brown & Brown, Inc. in January 2012. Mr. Armstrong’s prior experience includes Spectrum Equity Investors, a private equity investment firm where he led the insurance investing practice and Alex. Brown & Sons/ BT Alex. Brown Inc., an investment bank acquired by Deutsche Bank. Mr. Armstrong earned an A.B. from Princeton University. Mr. Armstrong is a member of the Board of Advisors of Cloverlay Investment Management LLC, a private equity investment firm and a member of the Board of Trustees of the Bishop’s School. We believe Mr. Armstrong is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive experience leading insurance companies and his industry knowledge.

Chris Uchida

Mr. Uchida has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2017 and our Corporate Secretary from March 2019 to February 2021. Mr. Uchida previously served as our Senior Vice President, Operations since June 2015. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Uchida served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at Arrowhead, which he joined in October 2004. Prior to joining Arrowhead, he was a Tax Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Uchida earned a B.S. and M.S. from San Diego State University and is a California Certified Public Accountant.

Heath A. Fisher

Mr. Fisher has served as our President since February 2014. Mr. Fisher was most recently a Managing Director of Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC, the largest global reinsurance broker in the insurance industry, which he joined in 2009. Prior to Guy Carpenter, Mr. Fisher held various leadership positions at reinsurance brokers John B. Collins Associates, Inc. and E.W. Blanch Company. Mr. Fisher earned an A.B. from Brown University.

Jon Christianson

Mr. Christianson has served as our Chief Underwriting Officer since August 2020 and as our Chief Operating Officer since joining our company in February 2014 to September 2020. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Christianson served as a Vice President of Holborn Corporation from April 2010 to December 2013. Mr. Christianson started his career with John B. Collins Associates in Minneapolis in 2002, where he serviced both casualty and property business. Mr. Christianson earned a B.A. in Economics from St. Olaf College.

29

Table of Contents

Britt Morries

Mr. Morries has served as our Chief Operating Officer since September 2020 and served as our Chief Technology Officer from August 2017 to January 2021. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Morries served as Chief Technology Officer of Wellbeats. Prior to joining Wellbeats, Mr. Morries served in senior management roles at John B. Collins Associates and Aon. Mr. Morries attended Metropolitan State University of Minnesota, where he studied computer science.

Jon Knutzen

Mr. Knutzen has served as our Chief Risk Officer since joining Palomar in April 2019. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Knutzen was a Partner at TigerRisk Partners from May 2017 to April 2019 where he led the firm’s Property Specialty and Reinsurance Solutions Practice. Prior to this position, Mr. Knutzen was an Executive Vice President at BMS Intermediaries from September 2016 to March 2017 and a Partner at Advocate Reinsurance Partners (acquired by BMS Intermediaries) from March 2015 to September 2016. Prior to this position, Mr. Knutzen served as Property Specialty Practice leader at TigerRisk from April 2013 to March 2015. Prior to TigerRisk, Mr. Knutzen held various leadership positions with reinsurance intermediaries Holborn Corporation, Guy Carpenter, and John B Collins Associates. Mr. Knutzen earned a B.S. from South Dakota State University.

Bill Bold

Mr. Bold has served as our Chief Strategy Officer since joining Palomar in April 2020. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Bold served as the Senior Vice President for Government Affairs at Qualcomm, where he managed global policy and regulatory affairs as well as public affairs and corporate social responsibility. He is a lecturer at the School of Global Policy and Strategy at the University of California, San Diego, where he teaches graduate courses on public affairs strategy, trade and globalization. Mr. Bold earned a B.A. in the Political Economies of Industrialized Societies from the University of California, Berkeley in 1990.

Michelle Johnson

Ms. Johnson has served as our Chief Talent & Diversity Officer since January 2021. Previously, she served as our Senior Vice President, People and Talent from December 2019 to January 2021. Prior to joining our Company, Ms. Johnson served as Senior Director, Global HR, Operations and Services for Panasonic Avionics from 2018 through 2019. Prior to joining Panasonic, Ms. Johnson served at AMN Healthcare as Assistant Vice President, Sales Operations from 2016 until 2018 and as Senior Director, HR from 2008 to 2016. Prior to AMN, Ms. Johnson ran her own consulting firm MJ TalentResources. Ms. Johnson earned a B.A. in Liberal Studies from Cal State University Long Beach.

Angela Grant

Ms. Grant has served as our Chief Legal Officer since November 2020 and our Corporate Secretary since February 2021. Prior to joining our Company, Ms. Grant served as Chief Legal and Innovation officer at CSE Insurance Group (“CSE”) from January 2019 to November 2020. Prior to joining CSE, Ms. Grant was Head of Compliance & Legal at Hippo Insurance from April 2017 to January 2019. In addition to her legal and compliance background, past leadership roles at Esurance, Kemper, and GEICO burnished her credentials in mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and strategy. Ms. Grant earned a J.D. from Texas A&M University School of Law and a B.B.A. in Business Administration from University of North Texas.

30

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This discussion and analysis of the compensation arrangements of our Named Executive Officers for 2020 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations and expectations regarding future performance and compensation programs. Compensation policies that we adopt in the future and actual results may differ materially from those described in this discussion.

This section discusses the material components of the executive compensation program for our executive officers who are named in the "Summary Compensation Table" below. In 2020, our "Named Executive Officers" or “NEOs” and their positions were as follows:

While the principal purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is to review the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, many of the programs discussed apply to other members of senior management who, together with our Named Executive Officers, are collectively referred to herein as our “executive officers” or “executives.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2020 Financial Results

We are a rapidly growing and innovative insurer focused on providing specialty insurance to residential and commercial customers. Our underwriting and analytical expertise allow us to concentrate on certain markets that we believe are underserved by other insurance companies, such as the markets for earthquake, hurricane, and flood insurance. We use proprietary data analytics and a modern technology platform to offer our customers flexible products with customized and granular pricing for both the admitted and excess and surplus lines (“E&S”) markets.

We provide admitted insurance products through our Oregon domiciled insurance company, Palomar Specialty Insurance Company (“PSIC”), and non-admitted insurance products through our Arizona domiciled surplus lines insurance company, Palomar Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“PESIC”). We distribute our products through multiple channels, including retail agents, program administrators, wholesale brokers, and partnerships with other insurance companies. Our business strategy is supported by a comprehensive risk transfer program with reinsurance coverage that we believe reduces earnings volatility and provides appropriate levels of protection from catastrophic events. Our management team combines decades of insurance industry experience

31

Table of Contents

across specialty underwriting, reinsurance, program administration, distribution, and analytics. The table below lists some of our key financial results for the year ended December 31, 2020:

​

During 2020, our gross written premiums grew 40.6%, reflecting strong growth in our existing and new product lines, strong policy retention rates and significant rate increases in our commercial lines. During the third and fourth quarters of 2020, we were impacted by several named hurricanes on the Gulf Coast (Hurricanes Hanna, Laura, Sally, Delta, and Zeta), resulting in significant catastrophe losses and additional reinsurance charges. While we maintained profitability despite these losses, our net income decreased during 2020 compared to 2019. In addition, our 2020 adjusted net income, which was the initial company performance metric under our 2020 annual cash incentive program, fell below the initial target set by the Board. This resulted in annual cash incentive compensation paid to our NEOs that was below targeted levels. We immediately assessed and modified our underwriting and reinsurance strategy with the intention of improving our risk adjusted return and protecting us from frequent catastrophe events like what occurred in 2020.

Progress on the Transition from Private Equity Model to Public Company Framework

The Compensation Committee identified at the time of our April 2019 IPO that compensation programs for our NEOs and other senior executives would need to transition from a private company to a public company framework. We were founded and significantly owned by private equity firm Genstar Capital (“Genstar”) until June of 2020. As such, our prior compensation model reflected that of a private company. Shortly after Genstar’s exit of its ownership stake in our stock, we began to transition our compensation framework to that of a public company. The following represents the progress we have made during fiscal 2020 and a preview of what is to come in fiscal 2021.

Compensation Philosophy, Process and Objectives

As we continue to transition from a private company to a public company compensation framework, and to attract, retain and motivate our executives, we seek to provide a competitive total rewards package geared toward the future growth and success of the Company and to align our executives’ interests with interests of our stockholders. We utilize a pay for performance approach which we are continuing to refine to better align compensation to the interests of our stockholders. Conversely, if individual performance and Company performance falls below pre-established goals, that generally will result in payment of below target compensation.

​

32

Table of Contents

Our overall total rewards philosophy has five Guiding Principles:

​

Role of the Compensation Committee and Management in Determining Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving the overall executive officer compensation philosophy and programs. The Compensation Committee relies significantly on the input and recommendations of its independent compensation consultant on an overall basis and the recommendations provided by our CEO when considering factors relevant to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (other than the CEO). In addition, our CEO is involved in setting the business goals that are used as the performance goals for the annual cash incentive plan and long-term performance-based equity incentives, subject to approval of the Board. Our CEO provides the Compensation Committee with his assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s performance and his view of the relevant factors further described below in developing his recommendations for the mix of elements used to compensate each Named Executive Officer, including base salary adjustments, annual cash bonuses and equity awards. The Compensation Committee discusses our CEO’s recommendations and then approves or modifies such recommendations in collaboration with the CEO.

Our CEO’s compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee, which approves adjustments to his base salary, performance goals and equity awards independently and without him present. Our CEO attends portions of the Committee’s meetings but does not attend portions of those meetings related to making specific decisions regarding his compensation. Other members of our executive management team also attend portions of the Compensation Committee’s meetings at the request of the Committee and/or the CEO.

33

Table of Contents

Role of the Independent Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee engaged PwC as its independent compensation consultant in 2020. The Compensation Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the scope of work PwC performs as well as any other compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other advisor that it retains. We bear the fees and expenses of these service providers. PwC provided the Compensation Committee advice and guidance with respect to:

PwC attends Compensation Committee meetings and attends executive sessions upon request by the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the independence of PwC considering SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards regarding compensation consultants and has concluded that the work of PwC for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

34

Table of Contents

Compensation Elements Used to Achieve Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We design the mix of our pay elements to support our strategic priorities of growth and to attract, retain and motivate our executives. In fiscal 2020, the elements of our compensation and rationale for using and determining each is set forth as follows:

​

Compensation pay mix

Our executive compensation program is designed to deliver compensation in accordance with Company performance with a large percentage of compensation at risk through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive awards. These awards are “at risk” and linked to Company performance, consistent with our belief that a significant amount of executive compensation should be in the form of equity and that an even greater percentage of compensation should be tied to performance for executives who bear higher levels of responsibility for our performance.

35

Table of Contents

The mix of target direct compensation awarded in 2020 for our CEO and the average of our other NEOs is shown in the charts below. Approximately 67% of our CEO’s 2020 total direct compensation, and approximately 58% of the average 2020 total direct compensation of our other NEOs, was at-risk, consisting of annual bonus, stock options and RSUs. As 2020 was a transition year from being privately controlled to being an independent public company, the equity awards in the charts below include one-time equity awards due to not having an annual grant cycle established during the fiscal year.

Compensation policies and other information

Our executive compensation policies and practices are designed to reinforce our pay for performance philosophy and align with sound governance principles. Listed below are highlights of our executive compensation policies and practices:

​

36

Table of Contents

Clawback Policy

We have a Clawback Policy pursuant to which we may seek the recovery of cash performance-based incentive compensation paid by us as well as performance-based equity awards. The Clawback Policy applies to our NEOs and other executive officers as determined by the Board. The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, direct the Company to disclose the circumstances surrounding any recoupment made under this policy.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy; Stock Trading Practices

We maintain an Insider Trading Policy that, among other things, prohibits our executive officers, directors, and other key team members from trading during quarterly and special blackout periods.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines for our CEO and President to ensure alignment of these executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Stock Ownership Guidelines are set as a multiple of base salary using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of annual evaluation. The salary multiples are as follows:

​

Executives subject to these Stock Ownership Guidelines have five (5) years after first becoming subject to these guidelines to achieve the required ownership level. Executive officers are required to hold a specific number of shares, net of taxes, until stock ownership guidelines are met. Stock ownership includes vested shares held directly or indirectly, outstanding time-based stock options that are “in-the-money”, unvested time-based RSUs and shares purchased via the ESPP. Performance awards are not counted toward the ownership requirement until the performance criteria is met and shares are vested and paid. Underwater stock options are also not counted toward the ownership requirement. The Compensation Committee intends to review the stock ownership progress of executives subject to these Stock Ownership Guidelines on an annual basis. While not required yet, each of our NEOs subject to these Stock Ownership Guidelines currently meet their ownership requirement.

Equity Awards Granting Practices

Although we do not have a formal policy on granting equity awards, the Compensation Committee has the authority to approve all equity awards. We did not have an annual equity grant cycle in 2020 but starting in 2021 we granted annual equity awards during the first quarter of the fiscal year, and subsequently expect to grant equity awards on a quarterly basis for eligible new hires, promotions, and discretionary purposes, subject to approval of the Compensation Committee. Equity grants to non-employee directors are discussed in further detail under the section “2020 Director Compensation”.

The grant date for all awards to eligible recipients, including executive officers and other key team members, will be determined by the Compensation Committee at its meeting to approve such awards. For stock options, the exercise price will always be the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. This procedure along with a pre-established grant cycle provides assurance that the grant dates are not being manipulated to result in a price that is favorable to us or our executive officers and other key team members. The vesting schedule of the respective award will be subject to our standard award agreements, which may be amended from time to time. Any vesting terms outside of our standard award agreements must be approved by the Compensation Committee.

37

Table of Contents

Impact of Accounting and Tax Requirements of Compensation

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executives. The Compensation Committee intends to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation paid to our executive officers where possible. However, the Compensation Committee also realizes that to attract and retain individuals with superior talent, it may decide to pay compensation to our executive officers that is not deductible due to Section 162(m).

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We follow ASC Topic 718 for our stock-based awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to team members and directors, including stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance units, based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that a NEO is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award.

For performance awards, when granted, stock-based compensation expense recognized may be adjusted over the performance period based on interim estimates of performance against pre-determined performance goals.

Compensation decisions related to fiscal 2020

Base Salaries

Annual base salary is a key component of our compensation framework based upon various factors, including the amount and relative percentage of total compensation that is derived from base salary when setting the compensation of our executive officers, Company performance, individual performance, professional experience, job scope and tenure. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by the Compensation Committee in connection with determining the base salary of each of our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee has not attempted to rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors that it considers. For 2020 base salaries for our Named Executive Officers were in effect as follows:

​

Annual Cash Incentive

A second key component in our compensation framework is annual cash incentives. We intend that annual cash incentives paid to our NEOs will reward them for the achievement of successful financial, strategic, and operational performance over a short period of time. Each NEO was eligible to earn an annual cash incentive for 2020. The Compensation Committee oversees the annual cash incentive program, evaluates the individual performance component, and approves the bonus payments of each NEO. Individual awards paid from the pool

38

Table of Contents

are determined based on the individual’s performance for the year which takes into account the target bonus for such individual. Bonus awards are payable in cash by March 15th of the year following the performance year.

In January 2020, the Compensation Committee approved the bonus pool calculation parameters for 2020. The bonus pool for our NEOs, except Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher, was determined by assigning a target bonus amount where a portion of the target bonus was based on an approved Adjusted Net Income target of $50.4 million and the remaining portion was based on the individual NEO’s performance: The table below sets forth the Target Bonus for the following NEOs:

​

Actual Adjusted Net Income is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net income excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook, net of tax impact. We calculate the tax impact only on adjustments which would be included in calculating our income tax expense using the estimated tax rate at which we received a deduction for these adjustments after any deduction for bonuses. The Compensation Committee selected Adjusted Net Income as the basis for the bonus pool calculation because it believes it is a useful metric to evaluate our results of operations and our underlying business performance.

The unusual frequency of severe weather-related events during the third and fourth fiscal quarters (Hurricanes Hanna, Laura, Sally, Delta and Zeta) resulted in catastrophe losses of $51.0 million in our Specialty Homeowners and Commercial All Risk lines of business. While we maintained profitability despite these losses, our adjusted net income was below the initial target set by the Board. However, the Company experienced significant premium growth and maintained profitability despite these challenges and other challenges posed by COVID-19, which included, among other things, a general economic slowdown, volatile performance of our investment portfolio, health and wellness related concerns for our employees, inability to travel, and the impact of the forgoing and other challenges on our business partners and policyholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee, with recommendations from Management, exercised its discretion in awarding partial bonuses to our NEOs, except Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher, to offset the impact of these natural disasters and other factors that occurred beyond their control. Therefore, each NEO, except Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher, was eligible for 60% of their 2020 target bonus amount as follows:

​

39

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements, Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher were eligible to receive an annual discretionary target bonus as follows:

Based on our 2020 financial results not meeting the pre-determined targets, Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher were not paid an annual cash bonus.

Refer to the “Executive Compensation – 2020 Summary Compensation Table for more detail.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

As noted above, the timing of our transition to a public company compensation framework was expedited when our previous controlling stockholder Genstar exited its ownership investment in us in June 2020. The Compensation Committee in consultation with is independent compensation consultant, PwC, and Management proceeded to lay the foundation for our new compensation philosophy. The third component in our compensation philosophy is the utilization of long-term equity incentives.

In connection with the completion of our IPO in April 2019, we adopted the Palomar Holdings, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”). Our 2019 Plan provides for grant of stock options, restricted stock awards, RSUs, performance awards and other share-based awards to our officers, team members, directors, independent contractors, and consultants. Our LTI compensation program focuses the efforts of our NEOs and other executive officers on the achievement of long-term objectives and aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders through the grant of equity awards, the value of which depends on our stock performance and other performance measures, to achieve strong long-term performance. We granted stock options to our NEOs in 2019 in connection with our IPO and granted stock options and RSUs to our NEOs in 2020.

STOCK OPTIONS:

40

Table of Contents

RSUs:

As we did not have a traditional annual equity grant cycle established, our Compensation Committee approved prorated equity grants to our NEOs and other senior executives in September 2020. These equity grants, which consisted of stock options (20%) and RSUs (80%) were in line with competitive market data provided by PwC and intended to serve as a reward for the executives’ past performance post IPO and as a retention tool to retain and motivate our executives. The decision to place more weight on RSUs was driven by market data highlighting RSUs as the most commonly used equity vehicle. In addition, executives who were present at the time of the IPO, were granted IPO stock options with an exercise of $15.00. At the time of these grants, our stock price had appreciated nearly 600% in value since the IPO. Thus, given the flexibility of our 2019 Plan and in order to attract and retain executive talent, the Compensation Committee allocated a portion of our executives’ equity awards to stock options based on the premise that value is rewarded when the stock price appreciates. The table below includes the LTI dollar value approved to be granted to each NEO. Refer to the 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for more detail.

​

Other Discretionary Cash or Equity-based Incentives

From time to time, the Compensation Committee may award other discretionary cash or equity-based incentives in the form of sign-on bonuses, relocation bonuses, promotion bonuses, retention bonuses and other bonuses. Sign-on and relocation bonuses are used in connection with the commencement of an executive’s employment with us. Generally, they are used to incentivize candidates to leave their current employers, relocate to one of our

41

Table of Contents

offices or may be used to offset the loss of unvested compensation or future income that they may forfeit as a result of leaving their current employer or business. Promotion and retention bonuses may be considered based on a review of competitive conditions and/or the role and skill set of the individual. Other cash or equity-based incentives may be considered based on relevant factors as determined by the Compensation Committee. Refer to the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and 2020 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table for further discussion on these types of incentives, as applicable.

COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

With respect to risk related to compensation matters, the Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing our compensation program, whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk taking. Our executives’ annual base salaries are fixed in amount and subject to annual compensation survey data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, PwC. Thus, we do not encourage risk-taking. Annual short-term cash incentives for fiscal 2020 are tied to overall company and individual performance. The portion of compensation provided to our executive officers in the form of stock options and RSUs help further align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Therefore, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation program does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and this Proxy Statement.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

Richard H. Taketa (Chair)

Martha Notaras

Daryl Bradley

​

42

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

2020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

​

43

Table of Contents

2020 GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

​

Mr. Bold’s target bonus was subject to proration based on when he joined the Company in April 2020. Refer to the “Executive Compensation- Compensation Discussion & Analysis- Annual Cash Incentive” for further discussion.

Based on our 2020 financial results not meeting the pre-determined targets, Messrs. Armstrong and Fisher were not paid an annual cash bonus for 2020.

Mr. Bold received a sign-on equity award of 20,000 stock options upon joining us in April 2020. Mr. Christianson received a promotion equity award of 12,875 stock options in connection with his promotion to Chief Underwriting Officer in August 2020. Each NEO also received prorated equity awards in the form stock options in September 2020, which were granted in connection

44

Table of Contents

with the acceleration of our transition to a public company compensation model and not having a traditional annual grant cycle established at that time.

2020 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table presents certain information concerning equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020.