In 1998, First Bank Richmond's mutual predecessor reorganized into the mutual holding company form of organization by forming First Mutual of Richmond, Inc. ("First Mutual of Richmond-MHC"), a mutual holding company that had no stockholders and was controlled by its members. First Mutual of Richmond-MHC owned 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware ("RMB-Delaware"). RMB-Delaware owned 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of First Bank Richmond.

On July 1, 2019, pursuant to the terms of our plan of reorganization and stock offering, First Mutual of Richmond-MHC converted from a mutual holding company to the stock holding company corporate structure. Upon the completion of the transaction, First Mutual of Richmond-MHC and RMB-Delaware ceased to exist, and First Bank Richmond became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc., a newly formed Maryland corporation (the "Company").

The reorganization of First Mutual of Richmond-MHC to a stock holding company and dissolution of First Mutual of Richmond-MHC was treated as a transfer as assets and liabilities under common control and accounted for prospectively on July 1, 2019, the date of reorganization and stock offering, resulting in the acquisition of First Bank Richmond by the Company and the dissolution of RMB-Delaware. The net assets and liabilities transferred of $6,035,398 resulted in a deemed distribution as part of the reorganization which is included in the condensed consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Simultaneously with the reorganization and stock offering, the common stock and additional paid in capital of RMB-Delaware totaling $12,751,000 was reclassified to retained earnings. The dissolution of First Mutual of Richmond-MHC included a repayment of trust preferred securities of $5,207,000 using the net proceeds from the stock offering which is included in the financing activities of the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. All of the outstanding common stock of First Bank Richmond is owned by Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Maryland, and all of the outstanding common stock of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Maryland is owned by public shareholders.

The costs of corporate reorganization and the issuance of common stock have been deducted from the sales proceeds of the offering.

In conjunction with the corporate reorganization, the Company contributed 500,000 shares and $1.25 million of cash to a newly formed charitable foundation, First Bank Richmond, Inc. Community Foundation (the "Foundation").

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or note disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for RMB-Delaware’s year ended December 31, 2018 included in the prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on May 16, 2019 (SEC File No. 333-230184). However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments.

The interim consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2019 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, have not been audited by independent accountants, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. The results of operations for the period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The Consolidated Balance Sheet of RMB-Delaware as of December 31, 2018 has been derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet of RMB-Delaware as of that date.

In certain circumstances, where appropriate, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer collectively to (i) RMB-Delaware and First Bank Richmond with respect to discussions in this document involving matters occurring prior to completion of the corporate reorganization and (ii) the Company and First Bank Richmond with respect to discussions in this document involving matters to occur post-corporate reorganization, in each case unless the context indicates another meaning.

Note 2: Accounting Pronouncements

Richmond Mutual Bancorporation - Maryland is an emerging growth company and as such will be subject to the effective dates noted for the private companies if they differ from the effective dates noted for public companies.

Revenue Recognition — Accounting Standards Codification 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASC 606) provides that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance enumerates five steps that entities should follow in achieving this core principle. Revenue generated from financial instruments, including loans and investment securities, are not included in the scope of ASC 606. The Company elected early adoption of ASC 606 in 2018. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a change to the accounting of any of the Company’s revenue streams that are within the scope of the amendments. Revenue-gathering activities that are within the scope of ASC 606 and that are presented as non-interest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income include:

- Service charges on deposit accounts – these include general service fees charged for deposit account maintenance and activity and transaction-based fees charged for certain services, such as debit card, wire transfer and overdraft activities. Revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is completed, which is generally after a transaction is completed or monthly for account maintenance services.

- Card fee income – this includes debit card fees charged based on the volume and number of debit card transactions. Revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is completed, which is generally after a transaction is completed or monthly for account maintenance services.

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better form their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief” (ASU 2019-05). This ASU provides transition relief for entities adopting the FASB’s credit losses standard, ASU 2016-13 and allows companies to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the fair value option for certain financial instruments. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” (ASU 2019-04). This ASU clarifies certain aspects of accounting for credit losses, hedging activities, and financial instruments. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022, assuming the adoption of an ASU implementing the FASB board decision in October 2019 extending the adoption date for certain registrants, including the Company, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating its current expected loss methodology on the loan and investment portfolios to identify the necessary modifications in accordance with this standard. The Company has not quantified the impact of these ASUs.

The FASB has issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases, with the exception of short-term leases, at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. For the Company, the amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Based on leases outstanding as of December 31, 2018, the new standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s balance sheet or income statement.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements, which provide entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new lease standard. Under this new transition method, an entity initially applies the new lease standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new leases standard will continue to be in accordance with current GAAP (Topic 842, Leases). The amendments in ASU 2018-11 also provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component and, instead, to account for those components as a single component if the nonlease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606) and certain criteria are met.

Note 3: Investment Securities

The amortized cost and approximate fair values, together with gross unrealized gains and losses, of securities are as follows:

	September 30, 2019
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Available for sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	5,000	$	3	$	8	$	4,995
SBA Pools		11,975		-		79		11,896
Federal agencies		26,193		-		64		26,129
State and municipal obligations		33,654		339		102		33,891
Mortgage-backed securities - government- sponsored enterprises (GSE) residential		92,050		141		825		91,366
Equity securities		13		-		-		13
		168,885		483		1,078		168,290
Held to maturity
State and municipal obligations		16,729		236		8		16,957
		16,729		236		8		16,957

Total investment securities	$	185,614	$	719	$	1,086	$	185,247

	December 31, 2018
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Available for sale
Federal agencies	$	40,812	$	-	$	2,802	$	38,010
State and municipal obligations		30,531		34		776		29,789
Mortgage-backed securities - government- sponsored enterprises GSE residential		56,945		11		2,286		54,670
Equity securities		13		-		-		13
		128,301		45		5,864		122,482
Held to maturity
State and municipal obligations		18,580		70		107		18,543
Corporate obligations		2,500		2,610		-		5,110
		21,080		2,680		107		23,653

Total investment securities	$	149,381	$	2,725	$	5,971	$	146,135

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at September 30, 2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value

Within one year	$	308	$	309	$	3,214	$	3,218
One to five years		17,785		17,807		8,587		8,678
Five to ten years		35,995		35,953		3,589		3,676
After ten years		22,734		22,842		1,339		1,385
		76,822		76,911		16,729		16,957
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		92,050		91,366		-		-
Equity securities		13		13		-		-

Totals	$	168,885	$	168,290	$	16,729	$	16,957

Securities with a carrying value of $69,475,000 and $86,267,000 were pledged at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, to secure certain deposits and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 were $35,246,933 and $57,703,608, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $0 and $1,507,529, respectively. Gross gains were recognized on the sale of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 of $104,000 and $170,000, respectively. Gross gains were recognized on the sale of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 of $0 and $12,000, respectively. Gross losses were recognized on the sale of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 of $82,000 and $87,000, respectively. There were no gross losses realized from sales of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $109,059,000 and $126,736,000, which is approximately 58% and 88%, respectively, of the Company’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolio. These declines primarily resulted from changes in market interest rates since their purchase.

Based on evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.

Should the impairment of any other securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

The following tables show the Company’s investments by gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	September 30, 2019
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
Description of	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Securities	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses

Available-for-sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	3,002	$	8	$	-	$	-	$	3,002	$	8
SBA Pools		11,820		79		-		-		11,820		79
Federal agencies		5,948		45		2,980		19		8,928		64
State and municipal obligations		3,264		22		8,642		80		11,906		102
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		31,644		173		39,517		652		71,161		825
Total available-for-sale		55,678		327		51,139		751		106,817		1,078

Held-to-maturity
State and municipal obligations		664		7		1,578		1		2,242		8

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	56,342	$	334	$	52,717	$	752	$	109,059	$	1,086

	December 31, 2018
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
Description of	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Securities	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses

Available-for-sale
Federal agencies	$	-	$	-	$	38,010	$	2,802	$	38,010	$	2,802
State and municipal obligations		4,516		26		21,529		750		26,045		776
Mortgage-backed securities - GSE residential		5,872		30		45,676		2,256		51,548		2,286
Total available-for-sale		10,388		56		105,215		5,808		115,603		5,864

Held-to-maturity
State and municipal obligations		3,271		11		7,862		96		11,133		107

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	13,659	$	67	$	113,077	$	5,904	$	126,736	$	5,971

Federal Agencies and U.S. Treasury Securities. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in direct obligations of U.S. federal agencies and treasury securities were caused by interest rate changes. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019.

SBA Pools and Mortgage-Backed Securities - GSE Residential. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in SBA pools and mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes and illiquidity. The Company expects to recover the amortized cost basis over the term of the securities. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019.

State and Municipal Obligations. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in securities of state and municipal obligations were caused by interest rate changes and illiquidity. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019.

Note 4: Loans, Leases and Allowance

Categories of loans at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 include:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018

Commercial mortgage	$	233,643	$	211,237
Commercial and industrial		81,109		71,854
Construction and development		55,362		72,955
Multi-family		70,613		43,816
Residential mortgage		132,628		132,492
Home equity		7,385		7,214
Direct financing leases		107,349		107,735
Consumer		14,009		13,520
		702,098		660,823
Less
Allowance for loan and lease losses		6,896		5,600
Deferred loan fees		457		468

	$	694,745	$	654,755

The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses for three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

				Commercial
	Commercial			and			Residential
	Mortgage			Industrial			Mortgage			Leases			Consumer			Total

Three Months Ended September 30, 2019:
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,892		$	1,768		$	122		$	385		$	114		$	6,281
Provision (credit) for losses		586			11			(34	)		71			71			705
Charge-offs		(14	)		-			(6	)		(107	)		(51	)		(178	)
Recoveries		4			2			22			54			6			88

Balance, end of period	$	4,468		$	1,781		$	104		$	403		$	140		$	6,896

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019:
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,147		$	1,817		$	139		$	389		$	108		$	5,600
Provision (credit) for losses		1,321			206			(41	)		121			108			1,715
Charge-offs		(14	)		(250	)		(42	)		(284	)		(100	)		(690	)
Recoveries		14			8			48			177			24			271

Balance, end of period	$	4,468		$	1,781		$	104		$	403		$	140		$	6,896

				Commercial
	Commercial			and			Residential
	Mortgage			Industrial			Mortgage			Leases			Consumer			Total

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018:
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,157		$	1,854		$	173		$	344		$	105		$	5,633
Provision (credit) for losses		(231	)		594			(27	)		106			8			450
Charge-offs		-			(400	)		(40	)		(122	)		(9	)		(571	)
Recoveries		22			5			43			41			5			116

Balance, end of period	$	2,948		$	2,053		$	149		$	369		$	109		$	5,628

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018:
Balance, beginning of period	$	2,424		$	1,663		$	257		$	337		$	119		$	4,800
Provision (credit) for losses		496			815			(146	)		181			4			1,350
Charge-offs		(7	)		(447	)		(89	)		(316	)		(39	)		(898	)
Recoveries		35			22			127			167			25			376

Balance, end of period	$	2,948		$	2,053		$	149		$	369		$	109		$	5,628

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	September 30, 2019
			Commercial
	Commercial		and		Residential
	Mortgage		Industrial		Mortgage		Leases		Consumer		Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	300	$	142	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	442
Collectively evaluated for impairment		4,168		1,639		104		403		140		6,454

Balance, September 30	$	4,468	$	1,781	$	104	$	403	$	140	$	6,896

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	675	$	847	$	356	$	-	$	-	$	1,878
Collectively evaluated for impairment		383,946		74,028		116,347		107,349		18,550		700,220
Ending balance: September 30	$	384,621	$	74,875	$	116,703	$	107,349	$	18,550	$	702,098

	December 31, 2018
			Commercial
	Commercial		and		Residential
	Mortgage		Industrial		Mortgage		Leases		Consumer		Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	300	$	394	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	694
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,847		1,423		139		389		108		4,906

Balance, December 31	$	3,147	$	1,817	$	139	$	389	$	108	$	5,600

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	743	$	1,177	$	389	$	-	$	-	$	2,309
Collectively evaluated for impairment		358,593		58,203		117,258		107,735		16,725		658,514
Ending balance: December 31	$	359,336	$	59,380	$	117,647	$	107,735	$	16,725	$	660,823

The Company rates all loans by credit quality using the following designations:

Grade 1 - Exceptional

Exceptional loans are top-quality loans to individuals whose financial credentials are well known to the Company. These loans have excellent sources of repayment, are well documented and/or virtually free of risk (i.e., CD secured loans).

Grade 2 - Quality Loans

These loans have excellent sources of repayment with no identifiable risk of collection, and they conform in all respects to Company policy and Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (“IDFI”) and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) regulations. Documentation exceptions are minimal or are in the process of being corrected and are not of a type that could subsequently expose the Company to risk of loss.

Grade 3 - Acceptable Loans

This category is for “average” quality loans. These loans have adequate sources of repayment with little identifiable risk of collection and they conform to Company policy and IDFI/FDIC regulations.

Grade 4 - Acceptable but Monitored

Loans in this category may have a greater than average risk due to financial weakness or uncertainty but do not appear to require classification as special mention or substandard loans. Loans rated “4” need to be monitored on a regular basis to ascertain that the reasons for placing them in this category do not advance or worsen.

Grade 5 - Special Mention

Loans in this category have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the Company’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. This special mention rating is designed to identify a specific level of risk and concern about an asset’s quality. Although a special mention loan has a higher probability of default than a pass rated loan, its default is not imminent.

Grade 6 - Substandard

Loans in this category are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Substandard loans have a high probability of payment default, or they have other well-defined weaknesses. Such loans have a distinct potential for loss; however, an individual loan’s potential for loss does not have to be distinct for the loan to be rated substandard.

The following are examples of situations that might cause a loan to be graded a “6”:

•

Cash flow deficiencies (losses) jeopardize future loan payments.

•

Sale of noncollateral assets has become a primary source of loan repayment.

•

The relationship has deteriorated to the point that sale of collateral is now the Company’s primary source of repayment, unless this was the original source of loan repayment.

•

The borrower is bankrupt or for any other reason future repayment is dependent on court action.

Grade 7 - Doubtful

A loan classified as doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. A doubtful loan has a high probability of total or substantial loss. Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital, and lack the resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Because of high probability of loss, nonaccrual accounting treatment will be required for doubtful loans.

Grade 8 - Loss

Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the loan even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

Commercial and Industrial

Commercial and industrial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, and may include a personal guarantee. Short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial Mortgage including Construction

Loans in this segment include commercial loans, commercial construction loans, and multi-family loans. This segment also includes loans secured by 1-4 family residences which were made for investment purposes. Commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The characteristics of properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse, but with geographic location almost entirely in the Company’s market area. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In general, the Company avoids financing single purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate versus nonowner-occupied loans.

Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan

commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Residential, Brokered and Consumer

Residential, brokered and consumer loans consist of three segments - residential mortgage loans, brokered mortgage loans and personal loans. For residential mortgage loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner-occupied, the Company generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Brokered mortgages are purchased residential mortgage loans meeting the Company's criteria established for originating residential mortgage loans. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer personal loans are secured by consumer personal assets, such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer personal loans are unsecured, such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas, such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

Leases

Lease financing consists of direct financing leases and are used by commercial customers to finance capital purchases of equipment. The credit decisions for these transactions are based upon an assessment of the overall financial capacity of the applicant. A determination is made as to the applicant’s financial condition and ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms as well as an overall assessment of the risks involved.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

		September 30, 2019
				Commercial		Construction
		Commercial		and		and		Multi-		Residential		Home
		Mortgage		Industrial		Development		Family		Mortgage		Equity		Leases		Consumer		Total

1-4	Pass	$	224,089	$	71,696	$	55,362	$	70,613	$	129,555	$	7,259	$	107,182	$	13,991	$	679,747
5	Special Mention		8,008		6,269		-		-		195		64		-		-		14,536
6	Substandard		1,546		3,144		-		-		2,878		62		65		18		7,713
7	Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		102		-		102
8	Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-

		$	233,643	$	81,109	$	55,362	$	70,613	$	132,628	$	7,385	$	107,349	$	14,009	$	702,098

		December 31, 2018
				Commercial		Construction
		Commercial		and		and		Multi-		Residential		Home
		Mortgage		Industrial		Development		Family		Mortgage		Equity		Leases		Consumer		Total

1-4	Pass	$	210,158	$	68,568	$	72,955	$	40,890	$	128,665	$	7,059	$	107,382	$	13,467	$	649,144
5	Special Mention		492		35		-		2,926		264		65		-		-		3,782
6	Substandard		587		3,251		-		-		3,563		90		151		53		7,695
7	Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		202		-		202
8	Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-

		$	211,237	$	71,854	$	72,955	$	43,816	$	132,492	$	7,214	$	107,735	$	13,520	$	660,823

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis of the recorded investment in loans as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	September 30, 2019
	Delinquent Loans										Total		Total Loans
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and		Total Past				Portfolio		> 90 Days
	Past Due		Past Due		Over		Due		Current		Loans		Accruing

Commercial mortgage	$	155	$	321	$	184	$	660	$	232,983	$	233,643	$	-
Commercial and industrial		557		-		787		1,344		79,765		81,109		-
Construction and development		-		232		-		232		55,130		55,362		-
Multi-family		-		-		-		-		70,613		70,613		-
Residential mortgage		617		622		2,388		3,627		129,001		132,628		2,151
Home equity		67		-		15		82		7,303		7,385		15
Leases		10		54		8		72		107,277		107,349		-
Consumer		66		22		18		106		13,903		14,009		18

Totals	$	1,472	$	1,251	$	3,400	$	6,123	$	695,975	$	702,098	$	2,184

	December 31, 2018
	Delinquent Loans										Total		Total Loans
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and		Total Past				Portfolio		> 90 Days
	Past Due		Past Due		Over		Due		Current		Loans		Accruing

Commercial mortgage	$	-	$	412	$	78	$	490	$	210,747	$	211,237	$	-
Commercial and industrial		321		328		1,243		1,892		69,962		71,854		130
Construction and development		-		-		-		-		72,955		72,955		-
Multi-family		1,684		-		-		1,684		42,132		43,816		-
Residential mortgage		1,147		807		2,193		4,147		128,345		132,492		1,913
Home equity		99		-		15		114		7,100		7,214		15
Leases		110		89		-		199		107,536		107,735		-
Consumer		67		24		38		129		13,391		13,520		38

Totals	$	3,428	$	1,660	$	3,567	$	8,655	$	652,168	$	660,823	$	2,096

The following tables present the Company’s impaired loans and specific valuation allowance at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	September 30, 2019
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Specific
	Balance		Balance		Allowance
Loans without a specific
valuation allowance
Commercial mortgage	$	353	$	426	$	-
Commercial and industrial		654		2,437		-
Residential mortgage		356		617		-

	$	1,363	$	3,480	$	-

Loans with a specific
valuation allowance
Commercial mortgage	$	322	$	377	$	300
Commercial and industrial		193		859		142

	$	515	$	1,236	$	442

Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	675	$	803	$	300
Commercial and industrial		847		3,296		142
Residential mortgage		356		617		-

Total impaired loans	$	1,878	$	4,716	$	442

	December 31, 2018
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Specific
	Balance		Balance		Allowance
Loans without a specific
valuation allowance
Commercial mortgage	$	397	$	453	$	-
Commercial and industrial		485		829		-
Residential mortgage		389		688		-

	$	1,271	$	1,970	$	-

Loans with a specific
valuation allowance
Commercial mortgage	$	346	$	387	$	300
Commercial and industrial		692		2,495		394

	$	1,038	$	2,882	$	694

Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	743	$	840	$	300
Commercial and industrial		1,177		3,324		394
Residential mortgage		389		688		-

Total impaired loans	$	2,309	$	4,852	$	694

The following tables present the Company’s average investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

	Average
	Investment in		Interest
	Impaired		Income
	Loans		Recognized
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019:
Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	684	$	10
Commercial and industrial		858		11
Residential mortgage		363		6

Total impaired loans	$	1,905	$	27

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019:
Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	706	$	32
Commercial and industrial		950		51
Residential mortgage		375		14

Total impaired loans	$	2,031	$	97

	Average
	Investment in		Interest
	Impaired		Income
	Loans		Recognized
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018:
Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	397	$	13
Commercial and industrial		2,345		26
Residential mortgage		324		2

Total impaired loans	$	3,066	$	41

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018:
Total impaired loans
Commercial mortgage	$	395	$	25
Commercial and industrial		2,472		54
Residential mortgage		329		10

Total impaired loans	$	3,196	$	89

The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018

Commercial mortgage	$	674	$	743
Commercial and industrial		848		1,177
Residential mortgage		324		357
Leases		102		202

	$	1,948	$	2,479

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, there were no newly classified troubled debt restructured loans.

At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance of real estate owned includes $109,000 and $176,000, respectively, of foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceeds were in process was $251,000 and $342,000, respectively.

The following lists the components of the net investment in direct financing leases:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2019			2018

Total minimum lease payments to be received	$	118,269		$	118,752
Initial direct costs		5,314			5,459
		123,583			124,211
Less: Unearned income		(16,234	)		(16,476	)

Net investment in direct financing leases	$	107,349		$	107,735

The amount of leases serviced by First Bank Richmond for the benefit of others was approximately $1.5 million and $2.8 million at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Additionally, certain leases have been sold with partial recourse. First Bank Richmond estimates and records its obligation based upon historical loss percentages. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, First Bank Richmond has recorded a recourse obligation on leases sold with recourse of $0, and has a maximum exposure of $851,000 and $875,000, respectively, for these leases.

The following table summarizes the future minimum lease payments receivable subsequent to September 30, 2019:

2019	$	12,577
2020		42,946
2021		31,556
2022		19,196
2023		9,361
Thereafter		2,633

	$	118,269

Note 5: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. There is a hierarchy of three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

Level 3

Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Recurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
September 30, 2019
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury securities	$	4,995	$	-	$	4,995	$	-
SBA Pools		11,896		-		11,896		-
Federal agencies		26,129		-		26,129		-
State and municipal obligations		33,891		-		33,891		-
Mortgage-backed securities -GSE residential		91,366		-		91,366		-
Equity securities		13		13		-		-

	$	168,290	$	13	$	168,277	$	-

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
December 31, 2018
Available-for-sale securities
Federal agencies	$	38,010	$	-	$	38,010	$	-
State and municipal obligations		29,789		-		29,789		-
Mortgage-backed securities -GSE residential		54,670		-		54,670		-
Equity securities		13		13		-		-

	$	122,482	$	13	$	122,469	$	-

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Available-for-Sale Securities

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy, which includes equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include agency securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, and mortgage-backed securities. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific investment securities but rather relying on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
September 30, 2019
Impaired loans, collateral dependent	$	257	$	-	$	-	$	257

December 31, 2018
Impaired loans, collateral dependent	$	344	$	-	$	-	$	344
Mortgage-servicing rights		1,227		-		-		1,227

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Collateral-Dependent Impaired Loans, Net of ALLL

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by management. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by management. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral. These discounts and estimates are developed by management by comparison to historical results.

Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for determining the amount of impairment include estimating fair value using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans.

Mortgage-Servicing Rights

Mortgage-servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage-servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Mortgage-servicing rights are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis based on an independent valuation. The valuation is reviewed by management for accuracy and for potential impairment.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following tables present the fair value measurement of assets recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	Fair Value at
	September 30,		Valuation	Unobservable
	2019		Technique	Inputs	Range

Collateral-dependent	$	257	Appraisal	Marketability		0% - 14	%
impaired loans				discount

	Fair Value at
	December 31,		Valuation	Unobservable
	2018		Technique	Inputs	Range

Collateral-dependent	$	344	Appraisal	Marketability		0% - 70	%
impaired loans				discount

Mortgage-servicing rights	$	1,227	Discounted	Discount rate		10	%
			cash flow	Prepayment Speed		1% - 56	%

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
September 30, 2019
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,377	$	41,377	$	-	$	-
Available-for-sale securities		168,290		13		168,277		-
Held-to-maturity securities		16,729		-		16,957		-
Loans and leases receivable, net		694,745		-		-		689,087
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock		7,600		-		7,600		-
Interest receivable		2,800		-		2,800		-

Financial liabilities
Deposits		607,808		-		609,754		-
FHLB advances		141,000		-		140,495		-
Interest payable		554		-		554		-

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
December 31, 2018
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,971	$	14,971	$	-	$	-
Available-for-sale securities		122,482		13		122,469		-
Held-to-maturity securities		21,080		-		23,653		-
Loans and leases receivable, net		654,755		-		-		643,572
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock		6,561		-		6,561		-
Interest receivable		2,686		-		2,686		-

Financial liabilities
Deposits		620,637		-		620,380		-
FHLB advances		136,100		-		133,141		-
Interest payable		551		-		551		-

Note 6: Earnings per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income allocated to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period which excludes the participating securities. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock compensation awards, but excludes awards considered participating securities. ESOP shares are not considered outstanding for EPS until they are earned. The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for share and per share data):

	For the Period
	July 2, 2019 to
	September 30, 2019


Net income (loss)	$	(3,250,335	)
Shares outstanding for Basic EPS:
Average shares outstanding		13,526,625
Less: average unearned ESOP Shares		1,052,804
Shares outstanding for Basic EPS		12,473,821

Additional Dilutive Shares		-

Shares outstanding for Diluted EPS		12,473,821


Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share	$	(0.26	)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share	$	(0.26	)

Note 7: Employee Stock Ownership Plan

As part of the reorganization and related stock offering, the Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) covering substantially all employees. The ESOP acquired 1,082,130 shares of Company common stock at an average of $13.59 per share on the open market with funds provided by a loan from the Company. Accordingly, $14,706,000 of common stock acquired by the ESOP was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Shares are released to participants proportionately as the loan is repaid.

ESOP expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was $121,000.

	September 30, 2019

Earned ESOP shares		9,018
Unearned ESOP shares		1,073,112
Total ESOP shares		1,082,130

Quoted per share price	$	13.99
Fair value of earned shares	$	126,162
Fair value of unearned shares	$	15,012,837

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations at September 30, 2019 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 is intended to assist in understanding our financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and are generally identified by use of words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

•

statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

•

statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

•

statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

•

estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and, by their nature, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.

Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or projected, include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected;

•

changes in the level and direction of loan or lease delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses;

•

our ability to access cost-effective funding;

•

fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions;

•

risks associated with the relatively unseasoned nature of a significant portion of our loan portfolio;

•

demand for loans and deposits in our market area;

•

our ability to implement and change our business strategies;

•

competition among depository and other financial institutions and equipment financing companies;

•

The impact of the termination of our defined benefit plan;

•

the deductibility of our contribution to the charitable foundation for tax purposes;

•

inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins and yields, our mortgage banking revenues, the fair value of financial instruments or our level of loan originations, or increase the level of defaults, losses and prepayments on loans and leases we have made and make;

•

adverse changes in the securities or secondary mortgage markets;

•

changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements, including as a result of Basel III;

•

the impact of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the implementing regulations;

•

changes in the quality or composition of our loan, lease or investment portfolios;

•

technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;

•

the inability of third-party providers to perform as expected;

•

our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic environment;

•

our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

•

our ability to successfully integrate into our operations any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel we may acquire and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames, and any goodwill charges related thereto;

•

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

•

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

•

our ability to retain key employees;

•

our compensation expense associated with equity allocated or awarded to our employees;

•

changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this report or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this report might not occur and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the Prospectus under the heading “Risk Factors.”

Overview

On February 6, 2019, the Board of Directors of First Mutual of Richmond, Inc. (the “MHC”), the parent mutual holding company of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware, adopted a Plan of Reorganization and Stock Offering (the “Plan”). The Plan was approved by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (the “IDFI”), as well as the voting members of the MHC at a special meeting of members held on June 19, 2019. Pursuant to the Plan, upon completion of the transaction, the MHC would convert from a mutual holding company to the stock holding company corporate structure, the MHC and Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware would cease to exist, and First Bank Richmond would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Maryland, a newly formed Maryland corporation. The transaction was completed on July 1, 2019. In connection with the related stock offering, which was also completed on July 1, 2019, Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Maryland sold 13,026,625 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share, for gross offering proceeds of approximately $130.3 million in its subscription offering and contributed 500,000 shares and $1.25 million to a newly formed charitable foundation, First Bank Richmond, Inc. Community Foundation (the “Foundation”).

The Company is regulated by the FRB and the IDFI. Our corporate office is located at 31 North 9th Street, Richmond, Indiana, and our telephone number is (765) 962-2581.

First Bank Richmond is an Indiana state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Richmond, Indiana. The bank was originally established in 1887 as an Indiana state-chartered mutual savings and loan association and in 1935 converted to a federal mutual savings and loan association, operating under the name First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Richmond. In 1993, the bank converted to a state-chartered mutual savings bank and changed its name to First Bank Richmond, S.B. In 1998, the bank, in connection with its non-stock mutual holding company reorganization, converted to a national bank charter operating as First Bank Richmond, National Association. In July 2007, Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware, the bank’s current holding company, acquired Mutual Federal Savings Bank headquartered in Sidney, Ohio. Mutual Federal Savings Bank was operated independently as a separately chartered, wholly owned subsidiary of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware until 2016 when it was combined with the bank through an internal merger transaction that consolidated both banks into a single, more efficient commercial bank charter. In 2017, the bank converted to an Indiana state-chartered commercial bank and changed its name to First Bank Richmond. Mutual Federal Savings Bank continues to operate in Ohio under the name Mutual Federal, a division of First Bank Richmond.

First Bank Richmond provides full banking services through its seven full- and one limited-service offices located in Cambridge City (1), Centerville (1), Richmond (5) and Shelbyville (1), Indiana, its five full service offices located in Piqua (2), Sidney (2) and Troy (1), Ohio, and its loan production office in Columbus, Ohio. Administrative, trust and wealth management services are conducted through First Bank Richmond’s Corporate Office/Financial Center located in Richmond, Indiana. As an Indiana-chartered commercial bank, First Bank Richmond is subject to regulation by the IDFI and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Our principal business consists of attracting deposits from the general public, as well as brokered deposits, and investing those funds primarily in loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate, first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, a variety of consumer loans, direct financing leases and commercial and industrial loans. We also obtain funds by utilizing Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. Funds not invested in loans generally are invested in investment securities, including mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities and agency and municipal bonds.

First Bank Richmond generates commercial, mortgage and consumer loans and leases and receives deposits from customers located primarily in Wayne and Shelby Counties, in Indiana and Shelby, Miami and Franklin (no deposits) Counties, in Ohio. We sometimes refer to these counties as our primary market area. First Bank Richmond’s loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral including real property, consumer assets and business assets. Our leasing operation consists of direct investments in equipment that we lease (referred to as direct finance leases) to small businesses located throughout the United States. Our lease portfolio consists of various kinds of equipment, generally technology-related, such as computer systems, medical equipment and general manufacturing, industrial, construction and transportation equipment. We seek leasing transactions where we believe the equipment leased is integral to the lessee's business. We also provide trust and wealth management services, including serving as executor and trustee under wills and deeds and as guardian and custodian of employee benefits, and manage private investment accounts for individuals and institutions. Total wealth management assets under management and administration were $138.2 million at September 30, 2019.

Our results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that is earned on loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that is paid on deposits and borrowings. Other significant sources of pre-tax income are service charges (mostly from service charges on deposit accounts and loan servicing fees), and fees from sale of residential mortgage loans originated for sale in the secondary market. We also recognize income from the sale of investment securities.

At September 30, 2019, on a consolidated basis, we had $956.2 million in assets, $694.7 million in loans and leases, net of allowance, $607.8 million in deposits and $200.4 million in stockholders’ equity. At September 30, 2019, First Bank Richmond’s total risk-based capital ratio was 21.5%, exceeding the 10.0% requirement for a well-capitalized institution. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, we incurred a net loss of $3.3 million and $1.5 million, compared with net income of $1.6 million and $4.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. Our earnings for the three months ended September 31, 2019 were impacted by a one-time $6.25 million contribution to our Foundation created as part of our reorganization to a public company. Our earnings for the nine months ended September 31, 2019 were impacted by the $6.25 million contribution to the Foundation discussed in the previous sentence as well as the adoption of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in the second quarter of 2019 at a cost of $1.7 million.

As we discussed in the Prospectus relating to our initial public offering, we are evaluating options to terminate participation in our multiemployer defined benefit pension plan, which will require us to pay an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability, which we previously estimated to be approximately $9.8 million after tax. Our actual termination expense may be higher or lower than our previous estimate depending on a number of factors, including but not limited to the interest rate environment and the valuation of plan assets as of the date of termination.

Critical Accounting Policies

Certain accounting policies are important to the portrayal of our financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan and lease losses, the valuation of foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights, valuation of intangible assets and securities, deferred tax asset and income tax accounting.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses to cover probable incurred credit losses at the balance sheet date. Loan and lease losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in our judgment, should be charged-off. A provision for loan and lease losses is charged to operations based on our periodic evaluation of the necessary allowance balance.

We have an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The determination of the allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on other classified loans and pools of homogeneous loans, and consideration of past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

Foreclosed Assets. Foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Management estimates the fair value of the properties based on current appraisal information. Fair value estimates are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment, market conditions, and real estate market. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of a decline in property values and could create the need to write down the properties through current operations.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”). MSRs associated with loans originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are capitalized and included in the consolidated balance sheet. The value of the capitalized servicing rights represents the fair value of the right to service loans in the portfolio. Critical accounting policies for MSRs relate to the initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests. The methodology used to determine the valuation of MSRs requires the development and use of a number of estimates, including anticipated principal amortization and prepayments of that principal balance. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The carrying value of the MSRs is periodically reviewed for impairment based on a determination of fair value. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are compared to a valuation prepared based on a discounted cash flow methodology, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance and is recorded as a reduction in loan servicing fee income.

Securities. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification Topic 320 (ASC 320), Investments-Debt, investment securities must be classified as held to maturity, available for sale or trading. Management determines the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. The classification of securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Debt securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and we have the ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities not classified as held to maturity are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income and which do not affect earnings until realized.

We evaluate all securities on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic conditions warrant additional evaluations, for determining if any other-than-temporary-impairments (“OTTI”) exist pursuant to guidelines established in ASC 320. In evaluating the possible impairment of securities, consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and our ability and intent to retain our investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, we may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies or government sponsored agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.

If management determines that an investment experienced an OTTI, we must then determine the amount of the OTTI to be recognized in earnings. If we do not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI will be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the OTTI related to other factors will be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings will become the new amortized cost basis of the investment. If management intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss, the OTTI will be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Any recoveries related to the value of these securities are recorded as an unrealized gain (as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity) and not recognized in income until the security is ultimately sold.

From time to time we may dispose of an impaired security in response to asset/liability management decisions, future market movements, business plan changes, or if the net proceeds can be reinvested at a rate of return that is expected to recover the loss within a reasonable period of time.

Deferred Tax Asset. We have evaluated our deferred tax asset to determine if it is more likely than not that the asset will be utilized in the future. Our most recent evaluation has determined that we will more likely than not be able to utilize our remaining deferred tax asset.

Income Tax Accounting. We file a consolidated federal income tax return. The provision for income taxes is based upon income in our consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported on our income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on our deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018

General. Total assets increased $106.7 million, or 12.6%, to $956.3 million at September 30, 2019 from $849.6 million at December 31, 2018, driven by a $40.0 million, or 6.1%, increase in the loan and lease portfolio, net of allowance for loan and lease losses, a $41.5 million, or 28.9%, increase in investment securities and a $26.4 million, or 176.4%, increase in cash and cash equivalents. The increase in assets was funded with the proceeds received by the Company in connection with the initial public offering. Most of the growth in the loan portfolio occurred in the commercial real estate and multi-family portfolios.

Loans and Leases. Our loan and lease portfolio, net of allowance for loan and lease losses, increased $40.0 million, or 6.1%, to $694.7 million at September 30, 2019 from $654.8 million at December 31, 2018. The majority of the growth occurred in the commercial real estate and multi-family loan portfolios, which in the aggregate increased $49.2 million, or 19.3%. We also experienced a $9.3 million, or 12.9%, increase in our commercial and industrial loan portfolio. These increases were partially offset by a $17.6 million, or 24.1%, decrease in our construction and development loan portfolio due to customers obtaining long term fixed rate loans from alternate sources.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The allowance for loan and lease losses increased $1.3 million, or 23.1%, to $6.9 million at September 30, 2019 from $5.6 million at December 31, 2018, primarily as a result of increased commercial real estate and multi-family loan activity. At September 30, 2019, the allowance for loan and lease losses totaled 0.98% of total loans and leases outstanding compared to 0.85% at December 31, 2018. Net charge-offs during the first nine months of 2019 were $419,000, or 0.08% of average loans and leases outstanding compared to $521,000, or 0.09% of average loans and leases outstanding during the first nine months of 2018.

Deposits. Total deposits decreased $12.8 million, or 2.1%, to $607.8 million at September 30, 2019 from $620.6 million at December 31, 2018. This decrease in deposits primarily was due to customer’s using their funds on deposit with First Bank Richmond to purchase stock in the Company’s initial public offering. Brokered deposits decreased $58.6 million during the first nine months of 2019. At September 30, 2019, brokered deposits totaled $65.9 million, or 10.8 % of total deposits, compared to $124.5 million, or 15.0% of total deposits at December 31, 2018. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in retail certificates of deposit of $39.8 million from December 31, 2018 to September 30, 2019.

Borrowings. Total borrowings, consisting solely of FHLB advances, increased $4.9 million, or 3.6%, to $141.0 million at September 30, 2019 from $136.1 million at December 31, 2018. The increase in borrowings, along with deposit growth, primarily was used to fund loan growth during the period.

Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity totaled $200.4 million at September 30, 2019, an increase of $114.5 million from December 31, 2018. The increase in stockholders’ equity was the result of the completion of the Company’s initial public offering and a $4.0 million reduction in accumulated other comprehensive loss, partially offset by a net loss of $1.5 million. First Bank Richmond’s tangible common equity ratio and its risk-based capital ratios exceeded “well-capitalized” levels as defined by all regulatory standards as of September 30, 2019.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

General. Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was $3.3 million, a $4.9 million decrease from net income of $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The decrease was driven by a $4.9 million after-tax expense reflecting the contribution to the Foundation. This resulted in a basic and diluted loss per share of $0.26 for the quarter ended September 30, 2019. The one-time expenses associated with the Foundation reduced basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.40 per share.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $1.8 million, or 20.0%, to $10.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $9.0 million for the same three month period in 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to a $75.7 million increase in the average balance of loans and leases outstanding and a 15 basis point increase in the yield on loans and leases for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018, which resulted in a $1.3 million increase in interest income. The average balance of securities increased $19.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018, and the average yield decreased 41 basis points, which resulted in a $50,000 decrease in interest income. The average balance of “Other”, primarily funds with the Federal Reserve Bank, increased $84.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018 due to funds received by the Company in its initial public offering, with the average yield on such funds increasing 78 basis points, resulting in a $600,000 increase in interest income.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $900,000, or 45.0%, to $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $2.0 million during the same period in 2018. The increase primarily was attributable to the higher average balance of FHLB advances in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the second quarter of 2018, as well as higher overall rates on certificates of deposit and FHLB advances. The average balance of FHLB advances in the third quarter of 2019 increased $32.1 million over the average balance during the three months ended September 30, 2018. The average rates paid on certificates of deposit and FHLB advances during the three months ended September 30, 2019 increased 50 basis points and 42 basis points, respectively, over the rates paid during the comparable period in 2018. Higher average balances of and rates paid on savings and money market accounts and interest-bearing checking accounts also contributed to the overall increase in interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income before the provision for loan and lease losses increased $969,00, or 14.0%, to $7.9 million during the third quarter of 2019 compared to $6.9 million for the third quarter of 2018. The increase was due to an increase in interest-earning assets during the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the comparable period in 2018. We experienced a 28 basis point decline in the net interest margin in the third quarter of 2019 to 3.31% compared to 3.59% for the third quarter of 2018.

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost. The following tables set forth for the periods indicated, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, resultant yields, interest rate spread, net interest margin (otherwise known as net yield on interest-earning assets), and the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances have been calculated using quarterly balances. Non-accruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans and are not material.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2019								2018
	Average Balance Outstanding			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance Outstanding			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases receivable	$	698,924		$	9,318		5.33	%	$	623,232		$	8,068		5.18	%
Securities		158,701			750		1.89	%		138,964			800		2.30	%
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock		7,580			112		5.91	%		6,716			77		4.59	%
Other		89,550			627		2.80	%		5,349			27		2.02	%
Total interest-earning assets		954,755			10,807		4.53	%		774,261			8,972		4.64	%

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and money market accounts		163,660			286		0.70	%		154,720			208		0.54	%
Interest-bearing checking accounts		104,951			115		0.44	%		100,558			51		0.20	%
Certificate accounts		297,848			1,632		2.19	%		287,065			1,216		1.69	%
Borrowings		147,302			865		2.35	%		115,164			557		1.93	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		713,761			2,898		1.62	%		657,507			2,032		1.24	%

Net interest income				$	7,909							$	6,940
Net earning assets	$	240,994							$	116,754

Net interest rate spread⁽¹⁾							2.91	%							3.40	%

Net interest margin⁽²⁾							3.31	%							3.59	%

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		133.76	%							117.76	%
		133.76	%							117.76	%

___________________

(1)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities.

(2)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses. We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to earnings, based on our review of the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses required to reflect management’s best estimate of the probable incurred credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan and lease portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, and economic conditions. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of estimated cash flows. Because of uncertainties associated with regional economic conditions, collateral values, and future cash flows on impaired loans, it is reasonably possible that management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and the related allowance may change materially in the near-term. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan and lease losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by full and partial charge-offs, net of recoveries. Changes in the allowance relating to impaired loans and leases are charged or credited to the provision for loan and lease losses. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on various factors, including, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans and leases, facts and issues related to specific loans and leases, historical loan and lease loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and non-accrual loans and leases, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses.

The provision for loan and lease losses for the three months ended September 30, 2019 totaled $705,000 compared to $450,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a $255,000 or 56.7% increase. The higher provision was due to the

overall increase in the size of the loan portfolio, primarily commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and multi-family loans, as well as a reflection of the overall slowing economy. Net charge-offs during the third quarter of 2019 were $90,000, compared to net charge-offs of $454,000 in the second quarter of 2018.

While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of our allowance for loan and lease losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the adjustment of reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $141,000, or 14.0%, to $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2018. A gain on sale of securities of $22,000 was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to no gain recognized in the same period in 2018. Gain on sale of loans and leases increased $77,000, or 49.7%, to $232,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $155,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 as a result of an increase in mortgage banking activity during the period. Other loan fees increased $108,000 during the third quarter of 2019 compared to the third quarter of 2018. Other income decreased $85,000, or 39.7%, to $129,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $214,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

Non-Interest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $7.0 million to $12.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018. Of the $7.0 million increase, $6.25 million was attributable to the contribution to the Foundation. Excluding the expense associated with the contribution to the Foundation, noninterest expense increased $769,000 in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Salaries and employee benefits increased $424,000, or 12.4%, in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the third quarter of 2018 due to merit increases and higher related benefits. The higher related benefits included a $135,000 increase in pension expense and a $121,000 increase related to our newly implemented Employee Stock Ownership Plan in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. The defined benefit plan was frozen effective October 1, 2019 and we are currently evaluating options to terminate the plan which will reduce expenses associated with the pension plan in the future. Data processing fees increased $97,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to September 30, 2018, primarily attributable to higher transaction volume and additional services utilized from the Company’s IT provider. FDIC assessment expense decreased $148,000 in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the third quarter of 2018 as the Bank paid no deposit insurance assessment. This was the result of the Deposit Insurance Fund achieving a specified ratio of eligible deposits and banks with less than $10 billion in assets receiving credit for previous assessments paid. The Bank has $36,000 in small bank credits on future assessments remaining as of September 30, 2019, which may be recognized in future periods when allowed for by the FDIC upon insurance fund levels being maintained. Legal and professional fees increased $164,000 in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily as a result of our corporate reorganization and stock offering. Advertising expenses increased $75,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018. Loan tax and insurance expense also increased $75,000 in the third quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $1.3 million, to a benefit of $898,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018. This decrease was the result of the net loss recorded for the period due to the $6.25 million expense associated with the contribution to the Foundation.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

General. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, was $1.5 million, compared to net income of $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The decrease in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the same period of 2018 is due to the $6.25 million expense related to the contribution to the Foundation as well as the adoption of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in the second quarter of 2019 at a cost of $1.7 million. Excluding these one time expenses associated, net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 would have increased by approximately $500,000.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $5.3 million, or 20.6%, to $31.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $25.7 million for the same nine month period in 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to a $79.3 million increase in the average balance of loans and leases outstanding and a 22 basis point increase in the yield on loans and leases for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018,

which resulted in a $4.2 million increase in interest income. The average balance of securities increased $11.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018, partially offset by a 4 basis point decrease in the average yield, which resulted in a $156,000 increase in interest income. The average balance of “Other”, primarily funds with the Federal Reserve Bank, increased $47.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018 due to the funds received by the Company in its initial public offering, with the average yield on such funds increasing 69 basis points, which resulted in a $845,000 increase in interest income.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $3.0 million, or 55.7 %, to $8.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $5.4 million during the same period in 2018. The increase primarily was attributable to the higher average balances of certificates of deposit and FHLB advances in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the first nine months of 2018, as well as higher overall rates on certificates of deposits and FHLB advances. The average balances of certificates of deposit and FHLB advances in the first nine months of 2019 increased $35.7 million and $35.3 million, respectively, over the average balances during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The average rates paid on certificates of deposit and FHLB advances during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 increased 53 basis points and 47 basis points, respectively, over the rates paid during the comparable period in 2018. Higher average rates paid on savings and money market accounts and interest-bearing checking accounts also contributed to the overall increase in interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018

Net Interest Income. Net interest income before the provision for loan and lease losses increased $2.2 million, or 10.8%, to $22.5 million in the first nine months of 2019 compared to $20.3 million for the first nine months of 2018. The increase was due to an increase in net interest-earning assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the comparable period in 2018. We experienced a 23 basis point decline in the net interest margin in the first nine months of 2019 to 3.34% compared to 3.57% for the first nine months of 2018.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019								2018
	Average Balance Outstanding			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance Outstanding			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases receivable	$	684,844		$	27,247		5.30	%	$	605,475		$	23,048		5.08	%
Securities		149,064			2,465		2.20	%		137,323			2,309		2.24	%
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock		7,140			296		5.53	%		6,716			263		5.22	%
Other		56,949			954		2.23	%		9,445			109		1.54	%
Total interest-earning assets		897,997			30,962		4.60	%		758,959			25,729		4.52	%

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and money market accounts		168,800			914		0.72	%		160,578			631		0.52	%
Interest-bearing checking accounts		102,221			278		0.36	%		101,198			153		0.20	%
Certificate accounts		308,976			4,835		2.09	%		273,310			3,200		1.56	%
Borrowings		143,597			2,424		2.25	%		108,290			1,444		1.78	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		723,594			8,451		1.56	%		643,376			5,428		1.12	%

Net interest income				$	22,511							$	20,301
Net earning assets	$	174,403							$	115,583

Net interest rate spread⁽¹⁾							3.04	%							3.40	%

Net interest margin⁽²⁾							3.34	%							3.57	%

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		124.10	%							117.97	%
		124.10	%							117.97	%

___________________

(1) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities.

(2) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses. The provision for loan and lease losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 totaled $1.7 million compared to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, a $365,000 or 27.0% increase. The higher provision expense was due to the overall increase in the size of the loan portfolio, primarily commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and multi-family, as well as a reflection of the overall slowing economy. Net charge-offs during the first nine months of 2019 were $419,000, compared to charge-offs of $521,000 in the first nine months of 2018.

Non-Interest Income. Noninterest income increased $205,000, or 7.5%, to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily driven by other loan fees, gains on sale of securities and gain on sale of loans and leases increasing $278,000 in the aggregate over the nine months ended September 2018. These increases were partially offset by lower service charges on deposit accounts and other income, which decreased $166,000 compared to the first three quarters of 2018.

Non-Interest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $9.4 million, or 57.3%, to $25.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, which included the $6.25 million charge attributable to the contribution to the Foundation and the $1.7 million charge related to the adoption of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan during the period. Excluding the expenses associated with these two non-recurring expenses, noninterest expense increased $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Salaries and employee benefits increased $2.4 million, or 23.0%, in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the first nine months of 2018, primarily due to the adoption of the nonqualified deferred compensation plan in the second quarter of 2019. Merit increases and higher related benefits accounted for the remainder of the increase. Excluding the nonqualified deferred compensation plan expense, salaries and employee benefits increased $662,000, or 6.4%, in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Data processing fees increased $191,000, while FDIC assessments decreased $117,000, or 27.0%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to September 30, 2018. The increase in data processing fees was a result of higher transaction volume and services while the decrease in FDIC assessments was attributable to the credit received in the third quarter of 2019. Legal and professional fees also increased $388,000 in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 for the reasons discussed above. Loan tax and insurance expense increased by $28,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to a recovery of $84,000 in property taxes in 2018.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $1.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018. This decrease was due to pre-tax income decreasing by $7.4 million during the first nine months of 2019 compared to the first nine months of 2018 as a result of the expenses associated with the contribution to the Foundation in the third quarter of 2019 and the adoption of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan during the second quarter of 2019, as discussed above.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash and investments that qualify as liquid assets in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure safe and sound operations. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Historically, liquid assets have been maintained above levels believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to assure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Liquidity management involves the matching of cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs and our ability to manage those requirements. We strive to maintain an adequate liquidity position by managing the balances and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities so that the balance in short-term investments at any given time will cover adequately any reasonably anticipated, immediate need for funds. Additionally, First Bank Richmond maintains a relationship with the FHLB of Indianapolis which could provide funds on short-term notice if needed.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of the management of our business. It is overseen by the Asset and Liability Management Committee. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as overnight deposits and holding excess funds at the Federal Reserve Bank. On a long term basis, we maintain a strategy of investing in various lending products and investment securities, including mortgage-backed and municipal securities. First Bank Richmond uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits, fund deposit withdrawals and fund loan commitments.

First Bank Richmond can also generate funds from borrowings, primarily FHLB advances. In addition, we have historically sold eligible long-term, fixed-rate residential mortgage loans in the secondary market in order to reduce interest rate risk and to create another source of liquidity.

Liquidity, represented by cash, cash equivalents, and investment securities, is a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. Primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans and mortgage-backed securities, maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments and funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and mortgage-backed securities and maturing investment securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. In addition, excess funds are invested in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. Cash is also generated through borrowings. FHLB advances are utilized to leverage our capital base and provide funds for lending and investment activities, as well as to enhance interest rate risk management.

Funds are used primarily to meet ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits, fund withdrawals, and to fund loan commitments. It is management’s policy to offer deposit rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions. Based on this management strategy, we believe that a majority of maturing deposits will remain with us.

Except as set forth above, management is not aware of any trends, events, or uncertainties that will have, or that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on liquidity, capital resources or operations. Further, management is not aware of any current recommendations by regulatory agencies, which, if they were to be implemented, would have this effect.

Off-Balance Sheet Activities

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that are not recorded in our financial statements, including commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. These transactions involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet risks. While these commitments are contractual obligations and represent our potential future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. At September 30, 2019, we had $96.9 million in loan commitments and unused lines of credit.

Capital Resources

First Bank Richmond is subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by the FDIC. The FDIC may require us to have additional capital above the specific regulatory levels if it believes we are subject to increased risk due to asset problems, high interest rate risk and other risks. At September 30, 2019, First Bank Richmond’s regulatory capital exceeded the FDIC regulatory requirements, and First Bank Richmond was well-capitalized under regulatory prompt corrective action standards. Consistent with our goals to operate a sound and profitable organization, our policy is for First Bank Richmond to maintain well-capitalized status.

						Required for					To Be Well
	Actual					Adequate Capital					Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio

At September 30, 2019	(Dollars in thousands)
Total risk-based capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	161,392		21.5	%	$	59,972		8.0	%	$	74,964		10.0	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk weighted assets)		154,496		20.6			44,979		6.0			59,972		8.0
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		154,496		20.6			33,734		4.5			48,727		6.5
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		154,496		15.7			39,335		4.0			49,168		5.0

As of December 31, 2018

Total risk-based capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	89,850		12.3	%	$	58,640		8.0	%	$	73,300		10.0	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk weighted assets)		84,250		11.5			43,980		6.0			58,640		8.0
Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		84,250		11.5			32,985		4.5			47,645		6.5
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		84,250		10.1			33,511		4.0			41,888		5.0

Pursuant to the capital regulations of the FDIC and the other federal banking agencies, First Bank Richmond must maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional common equity tier 1 (“CET1”) capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels of risk-based CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, repurchasing shares, and paying discretionary bonuses. At September 30, 2019, the Bank’s CET1 capital exceeded the required capital conservation buffer.

For a bank holding company with less than $3.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis and the FRB expects the holding company’s subsidiary banks to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. If Richmond Mutual Bancorporation-Delaware was subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $3.0 billion or more in assets, at September 30, 2019, it would have exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.

Impact of Inflation

The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the economic value of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of inflationary changes in the economy coincides with changes in interest rates. Since virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on our performance than does inflation.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has not been any material change in the market risk disclosures contained in our Prospectus.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) as of September 30, 2019, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of September 30, 2019, were effective. In addition, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls may be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not involved in any pending legal proceedings as a plaintiff or defendant other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, and at September 30, 2019, we were not involved in any legal proceedings, the outcome of which would be material to our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” contained in the Prospectus. Our evaluation of the risk factors applicable to us has not changed materially from those disclosed in the Prospectus.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The Company completed its initial public offering on July 1, 2019 through the sale of shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (Commission File No. 333- 230184), as declared effective on May 6, 2019. A total of 13,526,625 shares of common stock for an aggregate price of $135,266,250 were registered with the SEC. The Company sold 13,026,625 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share in its subscription offering for gross proceeds of approximately $130.3 million and issued 500,000 shares of common stock to First Bank Richmond, Inc. Community Foundation. Keefe, Bruyette & Wood, Inc. (“KBW”) acted as marketing agent for the offering. The net proceeds resulting from the offering after deducting all expenses related to the offering, including $1.5 million paid to KBW, were $127.7 million. Consistent with the disclosure in the Company’s prospectus dated May 6, 2019, we invested approximately $63.9 million of the net proceeds in First Bank Richmond, our wholly owned operating subsidiary, contributed $1.25 million to First Bank Richmond, Inc. Community Foundation and used approximately $5.2 million to redeem our outstanding subordinated debentures and related trust preferred securities. Our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) was unable to purchase any shares in the offering as a result of an oversubscription in the offering. As a result, approximately $14.7 million of the net proceeds of the offering were used to fund a loan to our ESOP to purchase 1,082,130 shares of Company common stock in the aftermarket. The remaining net proceeds were invested in securities and cash and cash equivalents.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Nothing to report.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Nothing to report.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

2.0	Plan of Reorganization and Stock Offering of First Mutual of Richmond, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-230184))

3.1	Charter of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-230184))

3.2	Bylaws of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-230184))

4	Form of Common Stock Certificate of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-230184))

10.1	Form of Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Garry Kleer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-230184))

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications (Chief Executive Officer)

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications (Chief Financial Officer)

32.0	Section 1350 Certifications

101.0	The following materials for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	RICHMOND MUTUAL BANCORPORATION, INC.


Date: November 14, 2019	By:	/s/ Garry D. Kleer
		Garry D. Kleer
		Chairman, President and CEO
		(Duly Authorized Officer)

Date: November 14, 2019	By:	/s/ Donald A. Benziger
		Donald A. Benziger
		Executive Vice President and CFO
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Maryland		36-4926041
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	RMBI	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Large accelerated filer [ ]				Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [X]				Smaller reporting company [X]

Emerging growth company [X]

			Page Number
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1

Item 1.	Financial Statements		1

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2019 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2018	1

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation (Unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018	2

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018	4

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018	5

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		38

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		38

PART II OTHER INFORMATION			39

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		39

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		39

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		39

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		39

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		39

Item 5	Other Information		39

Item 6.	Exhibits		40

SIGNATURES			41

	September 30,			December 31,
Assets	2019			2018
	(Unaudited)

Cash and due from banks	$	10,513,957		$	10,112,422
Interest-bearing demand deposits		30,863,289			4,858,748
Cash and cash equivalents		41,377,246			14,971,170
Investment securities - available for sale		168,289,560			122,482,487
Investment securities - held to maturity		16,729,471			21,079,974
Loans and leases, net of allowance for losses of $6,896,000 and $5,600,000, respectively		694,744,985			654,755,066
Premises and equipment, net		14,014,239			14,025,476
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		7,600,400			6,560,600
Interest receivable		2,800,042			2,686,010
Mortgage-servicing rights		1,214,660			1,227,356
Cash surrender value of life insurance		3,809,526			3,718,219
Other assets		5,639,888			8,112,005

Total assets	$	956,220,017		$	849,618,363

Liabilities
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	54,810,363		$	58,044,369
Interest bearing deposits		552,997,714			562,592,451
Total deposits		607,808,077			620,636,820
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		141,000,000			136,100,000
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		626,358			543,527
Interest payable		554,278			550,749
Other liabilities		5,877,399			5,934,235
Total liabilities		755,866,112			763,765,331

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $.01 par value Authorized - 90,000,000 shares and 500 shares, respectively Issued and outstanding - 13,526,625 shares and 100 shares, respectively		135,266			1
Additional paid-in capital		132,590,923			12,750,999
Retained earnings		82,652,959			77,480,318
Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)		(14,584,215	)		-
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(441,028	)		(4,378,286	)
Total stockholders' equity		200,353,905			85,853,032

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	956,220,017		$	849,618,363

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018

Net Income (Loss)	$	(3,250,335	)	$	1,620,089		$	(1,542,961	)	$	4,207,404

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax expense (benefit) of $175,173 and ($187,520), $1,400,357 and ($1,039,305).		500,236			(529,985	)		3,998,774			(2,937,374	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income, net of tax expense of $5,661 and $0, $21,544 and $3,124.		16,166			-			61,516			8,828
		484,070			(529,985	)		3,937,258			(2,946,202	)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(2,766,265	)	$	1,090,104		$	2,394,297		$	1,261,202

																				Accumulated
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Additional						Unearned			Other
	Shares				Shares						Paid-in			Retained			ESOP			Comprehensive
	Outstanding		Amount		Outstanding			Amount			Capital			Earnings			Shares			Loss			Total

Balances, June 30, 2019		-	$	-		100		$	1		$	12,750,999		$	79,187,692		$	-		$	(925,098	)	$	91,013,594
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-			(3,250,335	)		-			-			(3,250,335	)
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			484,070			484,070
ESOP shares earned		-		-		-			-			(751	)		-			122,100			-			121,349
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs		-		-		13,026,625			130,266			127,596,674			-			(14,706,315	)		-			113,020,625
Stock contributed to charitble foundation		-		-		500,000			5,000			4,995,000			-			-			-			5,000,000
Reorganization of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation		-		-		(100	)		(1	)		(12,750,999	)		6,715,602			-			-			(6,035,398	)

Balances, September 30, 2019		-	$	-		13,526,625		$	135,266		$	132,590,923		$	82,652,959		$	(14,584,215	)	$	(441,028	)	$	200,353,905