10-Q 1 pcb10q20180930.htm 10-Q Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018
or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                   to                  
Commission file number 001-38621
PACIFIC CITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
20-8856755
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
 
3701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
90010
(Zip Code)
 
 
(213) 210-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
 
Accelerated filer
x
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
x
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
x
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes ¨ No x
As of November 1, 2018, the registrant had outstanding 15,972,914 shares of common stock.





Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
September 30, 2018
Table of Contents
Part I - Financial Information
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Part II - Other Information
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 



2



Forward-looking Statements
This discussion of financial results contains forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as "may," "might," "should," "could," "predict," "potential," "believe," "expect," "continue," "will," "anticipate," "seek," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "projection," "goal," "target," "outlook," "aim," "would," "annualized" and "outlook," or the negative version of those words or other comparable words or phrases of a future or forward-looking nature. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including those factors identified in "Risk Factors" or "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" or the following:
business and economic conditions, particularly those affecting the financial services industry and our primary market areas;
our ability to successfully manage our credit risk and the sufficiency of our allowance for loan loss;
factors that can impact the performance of our loan portfolio, including real estate values and liquidity in our primary market areas, the financial health of our commercial borrowers and the success of construction projects that we finance, including any loans acquired in acquisition transactions;
governmental monetary and fiscal policies, and changes in market interest rates;
compliance with governmental and regulatory requirements, including the Dodd-Frank Act and others relating to banking, consumer protection, securities and tax matters;
the significant portion of our loan portfolio that is comprised of real estate loans;
our ability to attract and retain Korean-American customers;
our ability to identify and address cyber-security risks, fraud and systems errors;
our ability to effectively execute our strategic plan and manage our growth;
changes in our senior management team and our ability to attract, motivate and retain qualified personnel;
liquidity issues, including fluctuations in the fair value and liquidity of the securities we hold for sale and our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary;
costs and obligations associated with operating as a public company;
effects of competition from a wide variety of local, regional, national and other providers of financial, investment and insurance services;
the impact of any claims or legal actions to which we may be subject, including any effect on our reputation; and
changes in federal tax law or policy.
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary statements included in this 10-Q and our other documents filed with the Securities Exchange Commission. Because of these risks and other uncertainties, our actual future results, performance or achievement, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by the forward looking statements in this report. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future results. You should not rely on any forward looking statements, which represent our beliefs, assumptions and estimates only as of the dates on which they were made, as predictions of future events. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is initially made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.


3



Part I - Financial Information
Item 1 - Financial Statements

Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
 
$
27,532

 
$
16,662

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
 
136,524

 
56,996

Total cash and cash equivalents
 
164,056

 
73,658

Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
 
135,089

 
129,689

Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $21,117 at September 30, 2018 and $20,997 at December 31, 2017)
 
21,991

 
21,070

Total investment securities
 
157,080

 
150,759

Loans held-for-sale
 
12,957

 
5,297

Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan costs (fees)
 
1,309,124

 
1,189,999

Allowance for loan losses
 
(13,097
)
 
(12,224
)
Net loans held-for-investment
 
1,296,027

 
1,177,775

Premises and equipment, net
 
4,615

 
4,723

Federal Home Loan Bank and other restricted stock, at cost
 
7,433

 
6,589

Other real estate owned, net
 

 
99

Deferred tax assets, net
 
4,209

 
3,847

Servicing assets
 
8,114

 
8,973

Accrued interest receivable and other assets
 
9,296

 
10,279

Total assets
 
$
1,663,787

 
$
1,441,999

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing demand
 
$
350,346

 
$
319,026

Savings, NOW and money market accounts
 
283,759

 
317,878

Time deposits under $250,000
 
429,370

 
347,774

Time deposits $250,000 and over
 
356,051

 
266,612

Total deposits
 
1,419,526

 
1,251,290

Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank
 
30,000

 
40,000

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
 
11,323

 
8,525

Total liabilities
 
1,460,849

 
1,299,815

Commitments and contingent liabilities
 

 

Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no par value, 0 issued and outstanding shares
 

 

Common stock, 60,000,000 shares authorized, no par value; issued and outstanding 15,972,914 shares at September 30, 2018 and 13,417,899 at December 31, 2017
 
171,495

 
125,430

Additional paid-in capital
 
3,158

 
2,941

Retained earnings
 
31,325

 
15,036

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
 
(3,040
)
 
(1,223
)
Total shareholders’ equity
 
202,938

 
142,184

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,663,787

 
$
1,441,999

 
 
 
 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

4



Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Interest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and fees on loans
 
$
19,699

 
$
16,000

 
$
55,749

 
$
44,684

Interest on tax-exempt investment securities
 
39

 
46

 
120

 
142

Interest on investment securities
 
892

 
700

 
2,528

 
1,700

Interest and dividends on other interest-earning assets
 
866

 
344

 
2,071

 
870

Total interest income
 
21,496

 
17,090

 
60,468

 
47,396

Interest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest on deposits
 
4,643

 
2,534

 
12,101

 
6,983

Interest on borrowings
 
137

 
173

 
475

 
176

Total interest expense
 
4,780

 
2,707

 
12,576

 
7,159

Net interest income
 
16,716

 
14,383

 
47,892

 
40,237

Provision for loan losses
 
417

 
586

 
937

 
114

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
 
16,299

 
13,797

 
46,955

 
40,123

Noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges and fees on deposits
 
377

 
333

 
1,102

 
1,020

Servicing income
 
578

 
674

 
1,789

 
1,841

Gain on sale of loans
 
1,328

 
2,159

 
4,477

 
6,873

Other income
 
297

 
295

 
847

 
798

Total noninterest income
 
2,580

 
3,461

 
8,215

 
10,532

Noninterest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and employee benefits
 
5,840

 
5,594

 
18,239

 
16,689

Occupancy and equipment
 
1,244

 
1,073

 
3,634

 
3,259

Professional fees
 
213

 
445

 
1,724

 
1,341

Marketing and business promotion
 
555

 
500

 
1,484

 
1,220

Data processing
 
314

 
276

 
911

 
786

Director fees and expenses
 
220

 
198

 
661

 
541

Loan related expenses
 
83

 
98

 
205

 
301

Regulatory assessments
 
192

 
108

 
469

 
309

Other expenses
 
859

 
666

 
2,764

 
1,829

Total noninterest expense
 
9,520

 
8,958

 
30,091

 
26,275

Income before income taxes
 
9,359

 
8,300

 
25,079

 
24,380

Income tax expense
 
2,816

 
3,494

 
7,510

 
10,316

Net income
 
$
6,543

 
$
4,806

 
$
17,569

 
$
14,064

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per common share, basic
 
$
0.44

 
$
0.36

 
$
1.27

 
$
1.05

Earnings per common share, diluted
 
$
0.44

 
$
0.35

 
$
1.25

 
$
1.04

Dividend paid per common share
 
$
0.03

 
$
0.03

 
$
0.09

 
$
0.09

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic
 
14,730,120

 
13,412,407

 
13,865,190

 
13,405,413

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted
 
14,924,546

 
13,544,855

 
14,051,561

 
13,530,450

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

5



Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net income
 
$
6,543

 
$
4,806

 
$
17,569

 
$
14,064

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period
 
(604
)
 
9

 
(2,564
)
 
120

Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income
 
176

 
(3
)
 
747

 
(49
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 
(428
)
 
6

 
(1,817
)
 
71

Total comprehensive income
 
$
6,115

 
$
4,812

 
$
15,752

 
$
14,135

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

6



Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
 
 
Shareholders' Equity
 
 
Common Stock Outstanding Shares
 
Common stock
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2017
 
13,391,222

 
$
125,094

 
$
2,444

 
$

 
$
(531
)
 
$
127,007

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 

 

 

 
14,064

 

 
14,064

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 

 

 

 

 
71

 
71

Share-based compensation expense
 

 

 
522

 

 

 
522

Stock options exercised
 
21,971

 
267

 
(181
)
 

 

 
86

Retirement of fractional shares
 
(134
)
 
(2
)
 

 

 

 
(2
)
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.09 per common share)
 

 

 

 
(1,207
)
 

 
(1,207
)
Balance at September 30, 2017
 
13,413,059

 
$
125,359

 
$
2,785

 
$
12,857

 
$
(460
)
 
$
140,541

Balance at January 1, 2018
 
13,417,899

 
$
125,430

 
$
2,941

 
$
15,036

 
$
(1,223
)
 
$
142,184

Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 

 

 

 
17,569

 

 
17,569

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 

 

 

 

 
(1,817
)
 
(1,817
)
Stock issued under stock offering, net of expenses
 
2,508,234

 
45,537

 

 

 

 
45,537

Share-based compensation expense
 

 

 
486

 

 

 
486

Stock options exercised
 
46,781

 
528

 
(269
)
 

 

 
259

Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.09 per common share)
 

 

 

 
(1,280
)
 

 
(1,280
)
Balance at September 30, 2018
 
15,972,914

 
$
171,495

 
$
3,158

 
$
31,325

 
$
(3,040
)
 
$
202,938

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

7



Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
17,569

 
$
14,064

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation of premises and equipment
 
926

 
834

Amortization of net premiums on securities
 
577

 
570

Amortization of servicing assets
 
1,931

 
1,617

Provision for loan losses
 
937

 
114

Deferred tax expense (benefit)
 
386

 
(1,336
)
Stock-based compensation
 
486

 
522

Gain on sale of loans
 
(4,477
)
 
(6,873
)
Originations of loans held-for-sale
 
(78,478
)
 
(109,403
)
Proceeds from sales of and principal collected on loans held-for-sale
 
76,310

 
118,170

Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets
 
989

 
(751
)
Change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
 
2,798

 
2,239

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
19,954

 
19,767

Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
 
(26,073
)
 
(53,461
)
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and paydowns of securities available-for-sale
 
17,543

 
12,783

Purchase of securities held-to-maturity
 
(2,011
)
 
(4,133
)
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities held-to-maturity
 
1,078

 
1,894

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-investment
 
7,208

 

Net change in loans receivable
 
(128,487
)
 
(117,657
)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
 
(844
)
 
(903
)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
 
102

 
291

Purchases of premises and equipment
 
(824
)
 
(1,005
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(132,308
)
 
(162,191
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
Net increase in deposits
 
168,236

 
121,462

Proceeds from long-term borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank
 

 
40,000

Repayment of long-term borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank
 
(10,000
)
 

Stock options exercised
 
259

 
84

Stock issued under stock offering, net of expenses
 
45,537

 

Cash dividends paid on common stock
 
(1,280
)
 
(1,207
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
202,752

 
160,339

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
90,398

 
17,915

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
73,658

 
69,951

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 
$
164,056

 
$
87,866

 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
Interest paid
 
$
9,863

 
$
7,035

Income taxes paid
 
5,359

 
8,039

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investment activities:
 
 
 
 
Loans transferred to loans held-for-sale
 
$
7,034

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

8



Pacific City Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Pacific City Financial Corporation (collectively, with its consolidated subsidiary, "the Company," "we," "us" or "our") is a bank holding company whose subsidiary is Pacific City Bank ("the Bank"). The Bank is a single operating segment that operates eleven full-service branches in Los Angeles and Orange counties, California, one full-service branch in each of Fort Lee, New Jersey and Bayside, New York, and nine loan production offices in Irvine and Los Angeles, California; Annandale, Virginia; Chicago, Illinois; Atlanta, Georgia; Bellevue, Washington; Aurora, Colorado; Carrollton, Texas; and New York, New York. The Bank offers a broad range of loans, deposits, and other products and services predominantly to small and middle market businesses and individuals.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X and other SEC rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") are not included herein. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were included in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2018 (333-226208) and declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2018.
In the opinion of management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all of the adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to the Company include its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Significant Accounting Policies
The Company’s accounting policies are based upon GAAP and conform to predominant practices within the banking industry. The Company has not made any significant changes in its critical accounting policies from those disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were included in its registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2018 (333-226208) and declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2018. Refer to Adopted Accounting Pronouncements below for discussion of accounting pronouncements adopted during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are subject to change and such change could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the following accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company were adopted:

9



In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." This ASU clarifies principles for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers and supersedes current guidelines, Topic 605 - "Revenue Recognition," and most industry specific guidance. The principal of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, an entity should apply the following "Five-steps Model" prescribed in Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") 606: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This ASU also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. The amended disclosure guidance requires sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This ASU, as amended by ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12, ASU 2016-20, ASU 2017-13, and ASU 2017-14, is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and entities have the option of using either a modified retrospective or full retrospective approach for the adoption.
The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective approach. The Company’s source of revenue is net interest income and noninterest income. The scope of this ASU explicitly excludes net interest income and other revenues from transactions involving financial instruments, such as loans and securities. The Company identified and reviewed fees and service charges on deposit accounts and income and expense from other real estate owned ("OREO"), which are within the scope of this ASU. Based on this analysis performed, the Company concluded this ASU did not have significant changes to the method in which the Company recognizes these revenue streams. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. See note 13 for additional information.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurements of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The amendments in this ASU require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments by requiring a qualitative assessment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose methods and assumptions for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the statement of financial condition; requires the exit price notion to be used when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability; requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category; and certain other requirements. This ASU became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See note 2 for additional information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
The following are recently issued accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company that have not yet been adopted:
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, "Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases," and ASU 2018-11, "Leases Topic 842, Targeted Improvements," to provide additional clarification, implantation, and transition guidance on certain aspects of ASU 2016-02. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for both leases classified as operating leases and finance leases, except leases with a term of 12 months or less where lessees are permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. For leases with a term of greater than 12 months, lessees are required to recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use assets representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term measured at the present value of the lease payments. ASU 2016-02 and ASU 2018-10 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for a public business entity. Under ASU 2018-11, an additional transition option was provided that would allow entities to not apply the new guidance in the comparative periods they present in their financial statements in the year of adoption. Under this optional transition method, entities will be allowed to continue using and presenting leases under ASC 840 for prior years comparative periods and then prospectively adopt ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. At September 30, 2018, the future lease rental payable under non-cancelable operating lease commitments for the Company’s offices and loan production offices were $11.4 million. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.

10



In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)." The amendments in this ASU require that entities change the impairment model for most financial assets that are measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model. Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. It includes financial assets such as loan receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU is effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has formed a committee, developed an implementation plan, and engaged a software vendor to assist the Company to build a model. The Company is in the process of completing a readiness assessment and is engaged in the implementation phase of the project. The Company is working on: (i) developing a new expected loss model with supportable assumptions; (ii) identifying data, reporting, and disclosure gaps; (iii) assessing updates to accounting and credit risk policies; and (iv) documenting new processes and controls. Based on the Company’s initial assessment of this ASU, the Company expects to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses which could potentially have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which this ASU is effective.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, "Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities." The amendments in this ASU shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities acquired at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount, which continue to be amortized to maturity. Public business entities must prospectively apply the amendments in this ASU to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods. The Company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 - Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value including a three-level valuation hierarchy, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e.; an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The three-level fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are defined as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
Fair value is measured on a recurring basis for certain assets and liabilities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets or liabilities for impairment or for disclosure purposes. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company records securities available-for-sale at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain other assets, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans, servicing assets and other real estate owned ("OREO") are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Non-recurring fair value measurements typically involve assets that are periodically evaluated for impairment and for which any impairment is recorded in the period in which the re-measurement is performed.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value:
Investment securities: The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2). Management reviews the valuation techniques and assumptions used by the provider and determines that the provider uses widely accepted valuation techniques based on observable market inputs appropriate for the type of security being measured. Securities held-to-maturity are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

11



Loans held-for-sale: The Company records SBA loans held-for-sale, residential property loans held-for-sale and certain non-residential real estate loans held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value, on an aggregate basis. The Company obtains fair values from a third party independent valuation service provider. Loans held-for-sale accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value are considered to be recognized at fair value when they are recorded at below cost, on an aggregate basis, and are classified as Level 2.
Impaired loans: The Company records fair value adjustments on certain loans that reflect (i) partial write-downs, through charge-offs or specific reserve allowances, that are based on the current appraised or market-quoted value of the underlying collateral or (ii) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. In some cases, the properties for which market quotes or appraised values have been obtained are located in areas where comparable sales data is limited, outdated, or unavailable. Fair value estimates for collateral-dependent impaired loans are obtained from real estate brokers or other third-party consultants, and are classified as Level 3.
Servicing Assets: Servicing assets represent the value associated with servicing loans that have been sold. The fair value for servicing assets is determined through discounted cash flow analysis and utilizes discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions as inputs. All of these assumptions require a significant degree of management estimation and judgment. The fair market valuation is performed on a quarterly basis for servicing assets. Servicing assets are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value and considered to be recognized at fair value when they are recorded at below cost and are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned: The Company initially records OREO at fair value at the time of foreclosure. Thereafter, OREO is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value based on their subsequent changes in fair value. The fair value of OREO is generally based on recent real estate appraisals adjusted for estimated selling costs. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments may be significant and result in a Level 3 classification due to the unobservable inputs used for determining fair value. Only OREO with a valuation allowance are considered to be carried at fair value.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of dates indicated:
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Level
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
23,544

 
$

 
$
23,544

Municipal bonds
 

 
787

 

 
787

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
56,224

 

 
56,224

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 

 
54,534

 

 
54,534

Total securities available-for-sale
 

 
135,089

 

 
135,089

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
 
$

 
$
135,089

 
$

 
$
135,089

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
24,925

 
$

 
$
24,925

Municipal bonds
 

 
2,375

 

 
2,375

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
51,904

 

 
51,904

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 

 
50,485

 

 
50,485

Total securities available-for-sale
 

 
129,689

 

 
129,689

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
 
$

 
$
129,689

 
$

 
$
129,689

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

12



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of dates indicated:
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Level
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SBA property
 
$

 
$

 
$
482

 
$
482

Total impaired loans
 

 

 
482

 
482

Servicing assets - residential property loans
 

 

 
260

 
260

Total assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$
742

 
$
742

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For assets measured at fair value, the following table presents the total net losses, which include charge-offs, recoveries, specific reserves, impairment on servicing assets, gain (loss) on sale of OREO, and OREO valuation write-downs recorded for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$

 
$

 
$
(53
)
 
$

SBA property
 

 
(65
)
 
(151
)
 
(280
)
Servicing assets - residential property loans
 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
 

Other real estate owned
 

 
(3
)
 
3

 
(9
)
Net losses recognized
 
$
59

 
$
(68
)
 
$
(205
)
 
$
(289
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market value exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on financial instruments both on and off the consolidated balance sheet without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Additionally, tax consequences related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a potential effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in many of the estimates. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of significant financial instruments.

13



Financial assets: The carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions and accrued interest receivable are considered to approximate fair value. The fair values of investment securities are generally based on matrix pricing (Level 2). The fair value of loans is estimated based on a discounted cash flow approach under an exit price notion for September 30, 2018 and an entry price notion for December 31, 2017. The fair value reflects the estimated yield that would be negotiated with a willing market participant. Because sale transactions of such loans are not readily observable, as many of the loans have unique risk characteristics, the valuation is based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). It is not practical to determine the fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") and other restricted stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Financial liabilities: The carrying amounts of accrued interest payable are considered to approximate fair value. The fair value of deposits is estimated based on discounted cash flows. The discount rate is derived from the interest rates currently being offered for similar remaining maturities. Non-maturity deposits are estimated based on their historical decaying experiences (Level 3). The fair value of borrowings from FHLB is estimated based on discounted cash flows. The discount rate is derived from the current market rates for borrowings with similar remaining maturities (Level 2).
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments: The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fair value of these financial instruments is not material and is excluded from the table below.
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities as of the dates indicated:
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value Measurements
($ in thousands)
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
 
$
136,524

 
$
136,524

 
$
136,524

 
$

 
$

Securities available-for-sale
 
135,089

 
135,089

 

 
135,089

 

Securities held-to-maturity
 
21,991

 
21,117

 

 
21,117

 

Loans held-for-sale
 
12,957

 

 

 
13,738

 

Net loans held-for-investment
 
1,296,027

 

 

 

 
1,307,919

FHLB and other restricted stock
 
7,433

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Accrued interest receivable
 
4,850

 
4,850

 
33

 
488

 
4,329

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
$
1,419,526

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,386,260

Borrowings from FHLB
 
30,000

 

 

 
29,377

 

Accrued interest payable
 
4,964

 
4,964

 

 
46

 
4,918

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
 
$
56,996

 
$
56,996

 
$
56,996

 
$

 
$

Securities available-for-sale
 
129,689

 
129,689

 

 
129,689

 

Securities held-to-maturity
 
21,070

 
20,997

 

 
20,997

 

Loans held-for-sale
 
5,297

 
5,813

 

 
5,813

 

Net loans held-for-investment
 
1,177,775

 
1,177,539

 

 

 
1,177,539

FHLB and other restricted stock
 
6,589

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Accrued interest receivable
 
4,251

 
4,251

 
25

 
533

 
3,693

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
$
1,251,290

 
$
1,250,259

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,250,259

FHLB and other restricted stock
 
40,000

 
39,778

 

 
39,778

 

Accrued interest payable
 
2,251

 
2,251

 

 
60

 
2,191

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


14



Note 3 - Investment Securities
Debt and equity securities have been classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity in the consolidated balance sheet according to management’s intent. The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gain
 
Gross Unrealized Loss
 
Fair Value
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$
24,372

 
$

 
$
(828
)
 
$
23,544

Municipal bonds
 
789

 
1

 
(3
)
 
787

Mortgage-backed securities
 
58,113

 
5

 
(1,894
)
 
56,224

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
56,321

 
11

 
(1,798
)
 
54,534

Total securities available-for-sale
 
$
139,595

 
$
17

 
$
(4,523
)
 
$
135,089

Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
$
5,110

 
$
18

 
$
(49
)
 
$
5,079

Mortgage-backed securities
 
16,881

 

 
(843
)
 
16,038

Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
21,991

 
$
18

 
$
(892
)
 
$
21,117

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$
25,231

 
$
17

 
$
(323
)
 
$
24,925

Municipal bonds
 
2,376

 
1

 
(2
)
 
2,375

Mortgage-backed securities
 
52,565

 
8

 
(669
)
 
51,904

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
51,459

 
34

 
(1,008
)
 
50,485

Total securities available-for-sale
 
$
131,631

 
$
60

 
$
(2,002
)
 
$
129,689

Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
$
5,263

 
$
181

 
$
(5
)
 
$
5,439

Mortgage-backed securities
 
15,807

 
8

 
(257
)
 
15,558

Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
21,070

 
$
189

 
$
(262
)
 
$
20,997

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, pledged securities were $112.3 million and $109.9 million, respectively. These securities were pledged for the State Deposit from the California State Treasurer.


15



The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2018. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities, if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.
 
 
Securities Available-For-Sale
 
Securities Held-To-Maturity
($ in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Within one year
 
$

 
$

 
$
134

 
$
133

One to five years
 

 

 
1,440

 
1,432

Five to ten years
 
4,360

 
4,292

 
1,220

 
1,203

Greater than ten years
 
20,801

 
20,039

 
2,316

 
2,311

Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
 
114,434

 
110,758

 
16,881

 
16,038

Total
 
$
139,595

 
$
135,089

 
$
21,991

 
$
21,117

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents proceeds from sales and calls of securities available-for-sale and the associated gross gains and losses realized through earnings upon the sales and calls of securities available-for-sale for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Gross realized gains on sales and calls of securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Gross realized losses on sales and calls of securities available-for-sale
 

 

 

 

Net realized gains (losses) on sales and calls of securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$

 
$
1,060

 
$

Tax expense on sales and calls of securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



16



The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses by security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position as of the dates indicated:
 
 
Length of Time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position
 
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Longer
 
Total
($ in thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Number of Securities
 
Fair Value
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Number of Securities
 
Fair Value
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Number of Securities
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$
6,978

 
$
(171
)
 
5

 
$
16,566

 
$
(657
)
 
15

 
$
23,544

 
$
(828
)
 
20

Municipal bonds
 
592

 
(3
)
 
1

 

 

 

 
592

 
(3
)
 
1

Mortgage-backed securities
 
20,505

 
(418
)
 
14

 
35,036

 
(1,476
)
 
43

 
55,541

 
(1,894
)
 
57

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
12,000

 
(182
)
 
8

 
32,799

 
(1,616
)
 
32

 
44,799

 
(1,798
)
 
40

Total securities available-for-sale
 
$
40,075

 
$
(774
)
 
28

 
$
84,401

 
$
(3,749
)
 
90

 
$
124,476

 
$
(4,523
)
 
118

Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
$
3,791

 
$
(49
)
 
13

 

 

 

 
$
3,791

 
$
(49
)
 
13

Mortgage-backed securities
 
5,400

 
(204
)
 
4

 
10,638

 
(639
)
 
12

 
16,038

 
(843
)
 
16

Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
9,191

 
$
(253
)
 
17

 
$
10,638

 
$
(639
)
 
12

 
$
19,829

 
$
(892
)
 
29

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$
11,736

 
$
(103
)
 
9

 
$
8,798

 
$
(220
)
 
7

 
$
20,534

 
$
(323
)
 
16

Municipal bonds
 
1,115

 
(2
)
 
2

 

 

 

 
1,115

 
(2
)
 
2

Mortgage-backed securities
 
31,876

 
(352
)
 
29

 
18,762

 
(317
)
 
21

 
50,638

 
(669
)
 
50

Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
31,191

 
(454
)
 
19

 
16,284

 
(554
)
 
19

 
47,475

 
(1,008
)
 
38

Total securities available-for-sale
 
$
75,918

 
$
(911
)
 
59

 
$
43,844

 
$
(1,091
)
 
47

 
$
119,762

 
$
(2,002
)
 
106

Securities held-to-maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
$
1,183

 
$
(5
)
 
5

 

 

 

 
$
1,183

 
$
(5
)
 
5

Mortgage-backed securities
 
7,997

 
(93
)
 
6

 
5,739

 
(164
)
 
7

 
13,736

 
(257
)
 
13

Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
9,180

 
$
(98
)
 
11

 
$
5,739

 
$
(164
)
 
7

 
$
14,919

 
$
(262
)
 
18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



17



In accordance with FASB ASC 320, Investments - Debt and Equity Securities, the Company performs an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") assessment at least on a quarterly basis. OTTI is recognized when fair value is below the amortized cost where: (i) an entity has the intent to sell the security; (ii) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (iii) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.
All individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had an investment grade rating upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not established any cause for default on these securities and various rating agencies have reaffirmed their long-term investment grade status as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. These securities have fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market interest rates fluctuated. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, the unrealized losses on municipal bonds are not considered other-than-temporary impaired, as the bonds are rated investment grade and there are no credit quality concerns with the issuers. Interest payments have been made as scheduled, and management believes this will continue in the future until the bonds get paid in full. The Company determined that the investment securities with unrealized losses for twelve months or more are not other-than-temporary impaired, and, therefore, no impairment was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Note 4 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans Held-For-Investment
The following table presents the composition of the Company’s loans held-for-investment as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
703,250

 
$
662,840

Residential property
 
215,340

 
168,898

SBA property
 
126,816

 
130,438

Construction
 
28,895

 
23,215

Total real estate loans
 
1,074,301

 
985,391

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
96,102

 
77,438

Commercial lines of credit
 
72,219

 
60,850

SBA commercial term
 
28,312

 
30,199

Trade finance
 
10,353

 
1,920

Total commercial and industrial loans
 
206,986

 
170,407

Consumer loans
 
27,472

 
33,870

Loans held-for-investment
 
1,308,759

 
1,189,668

Deferred loan costs (fees)
 
365

 
331

Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan costs (fees)
 
1,309,124

 
1,189,999

Allowance for loan losses
 
(13,097
)
 
(12,224
)
Net loans held-for-investment
 
$
1,296,027

 
$
1,177,775

 
 
 
 
 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may grant loans to certain officers and directors, and the companies with which they are associated. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no such loans outstanding.


18



Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table presents the activities in allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment, which is consistent with the Company’s methodology for determining allowance for loan losses, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Three Months Ended
($ in thousands)
 
Real Estate
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Consumer
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at July 1, 2018
 
$
9,323

 
$
3,108

 
$
190

 
$
12,621

Charge-offs
 

 
(18
)
 
(26
)
 
(44
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
16

 
46

 
41

 
103

Provision for loan losses
 
269

 
108

 
40

 
417

Balance at September 30, 2018
 
$
9,608

 
$
3,244

 
$
245

 
$
13,097

September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at July 1, 2017
 
$
7,818

 
$
3,058

 
$
153

 
$
11,029

Charge-offs
 
(8
)
 
(72
)
 
(14
)
 
(94
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 

 
121

 
9

 
130

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
697

 
(121
)
 
10

 
586

Balance at September 30, 2017
 
$
8,507

 
$
2,986

 
$
158

 
$
11,651

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents the activities in allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment, which is consistent with the Company’s methodology for determining allowance for loan losses, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended
($ in thousands)
 
Real Estate
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Consumer
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2018
 
$
8,507

 
$
3,548

 
$
169

 
$
12,224

Charge-offs
 
(204
)
 
(108
)
 
(167
)
 
(479
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
68

 
280

 
67

 
415

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
1,237

 
(476
)
 
176

 
937

Balance at September 30, 2018
 
$
9,608

 
$
3,244

 
$
245

 
$
13,097

September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2017
 
$
7,497

 
$
3,657

 
$
166

 
$
11,320

Charge-offs
 
(8
)
 
(292
)
 
(56
)
 
(356
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
1

 
539

 
33

 
573

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
1,017

 
(918
)
 
15

 
114

Balance at September 30, 2017
 
$
8,507

 
$
2,986

 
$
158

 
$
11,651

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

19



The following tables present the information on allowance for loan losses and recorded investments by portfolio segment and impairment methodology as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
Real Estate
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Consumer
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
5

 
$
156

 
$

 
$
161

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
9,603

 
3,088

 
245

 
12,936

Total
 
$
9,608

 
$
3,244

 
$
245

 
$
13,097

Loans receivable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,524

 
$
401

 
$

 
$
1,925

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
1,072,777

 
206,585

 
27,472

 
1,306,834

Total
 
$
1,074,301

 
$
206,986

 
$
27,472

 
$
1,308,759

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$

 
$
208

 
$

 
$
208

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
8,507

 
3,340

 
169

 
12,016

Total
 
$
8,507

 
$
3,548

 
$
169

 
$
12,224

Loans receivable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
3,191

 
$
610

 
$

 
$
3,801

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
982,200

 
169,797

 
33,870

 
1,185,867

Total
 
$
985,391

 
$
170,407

 
$
33,870

 
$
1,189,668

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


20



Credit Quality Indicators
The Company classifies loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans in regards to credit risk. This analysis typically includes non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial property and commercial and industrial loans, and is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Pass - Loans classified as pass include non-homogeneous loans not meeting the risk ratings defined below and smaller, homogeneous loans not assessed on an individual basis.
Special Mention - Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.
Substandard - Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or repayment in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
The following table presents the risk categories for the recoded investment in loans by portfolio segment as of dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
Pass
 
Special
Mention
 
Substandard
 
Doubtful
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
692,400

 
$
9,942

 
$
908

 
$

 
$
703,250

Residential property
 
215,340

 

 

 

 
215,340

SBA property
 
121,970

 

 
4,846

 

 
126,816

Construction
 
26,275

 
2,620

 

 

 
28,895

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
96,068

 

 
34

 

 
96,102

Commercial lines of credit
 
72,219

 

 

 

 
72,219

SBA commercial term
 
27,963

 
16

 
333

 

 
28,312

Trade finance
 
10,353

 

 

 

 
10,353

Consumer loans
 
27,358

 

 
114

 

 
27,472

Total
 
$
1,289,946

 
$
12,578

 
$
6,235

 
$

 
$
1,308,759

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
657,511

 
$
4,819

 
$
510

 
$

 
$
662,840

Residential property
 
168,168

 

 
730

 

 
168,898

SBA property
 
124,837

 
2,435

 
3,166

 

 
130,438

Construction
 
23,215

 

 

 

 
23,215

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
77,261

 

 
177

 

 
77,438

Commercial lines of credit
 
60,840

 

 
10

 

 
60,850

SBA commercial term
 
29,831

 
4

 
364

 

 
30,199

Trade finance
 
1,920

 

 

 

 
1,920

Consumer loans
 
33,845

 

 
25

 

 
33,870

Total
 
$
1,177,428

 
$
7,258

 
$
4,982

 
$

 
$
1,189,668

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

21



Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans
The following table presents the aging of past due recorded investment in accruing loans and nonaccrual loans by portfolio segment as of dates indicated:
 
 
Still Accruing
 
 
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
30 to 59 Days
Past Due
 
60 to 89 Days
Past Due
 
90 or More Days Past Due
 
Nonaccrual
 
Total Past Due and Nonaccrual
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
234

 
$
234

Residential property
 
95

 
303

 

 

 
398

SBA property
 

 

 

 
970

 
970

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SBA commercial term
 
82

 
44

 

 
254

 
380

Consumer loans
 
160

 
79

 

 
114

 
353

Total
 
$
337

 
$
426

 
$

 
$
1,572

 
$
2,335

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
318

 
$
318

Residential property
 
949

 
96

 

 
730

 
1,775

SBA property
 

 

 

 
1,810

 
1,810

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 

 

 

 
4

 
4

Commercial lines of credit
 

 

 

 
10

 
10

SBA commercial term
 
2

 

 

 
338

 
340

Consumer loans
 
262

 
32

 

 
24

 
318

Total
 
$
1,213

 
$
128

 
$

 
$
3,234

 
$
4,575

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual loans included loans guaranteed by the U.S. government agency of none and $831 thousand, respectively, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

22



Impaired Loans
Loans are considered impaired in the following cases: (i) the loan is on nonaccrual, (ii) when principal or interest payments on the loan have been contractually past due for 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well-collateralized and in the process of collection, (iii) the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") where terms not typically granted by the Company were offered to the borrower, (iv) when current information or events make it unlikely to collect the loan balance in full according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, (v) there is a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition that raises uncertainty as to timely collection of either principal or interest, or (vi) full payment of both principal and interest of the loan according to the original contractual terms is in doubt.
The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated. The recorded investment presents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loans and net of any deferred fees and costs.
 
 
With No Allowance Recorded
 
With an Allowance Recorded
($ in thousands)
 
Recorded Investment
 
Unpaid Principal Balance
 
Recorded Investment
 
Unpaid Principal Balance
 
Related Allowance
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
234

 
$
234

 
$

 
$

 
$

SBA property
 
808

 
891

 
482

 
481

 
5

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
80

 
86

 

 

 

SBA commercial term
 
92

 
127

 
229

 
243

 
156

Total
 
$
1,214

 
$
1,338

 
$
711

 
$
724

 
$
161

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
318

 
$
494

 
$

 
$

 
$

Residential property
 
730

 
730

 

 

 

SBA property
 
2,143

 
3,639

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
199

 
216

 

 

 

Commercial lines of credit
 
10

 
20

 

 

 

SBA commercial term
 
122

 
288

 
279

 
354

 
208

Total
 
$
3,522

 
$
5,387

 
$
279

 
$
354

 
$
208

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

23



The following table presents information on the recorded investment in impaired loans by portfolio segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest
Income
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest
Income
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
237

 
$

 
$
353

 
$

SBA property
 
1,297

 
5

 
1,950

 
20

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
85

 
1

 
612

 
4

Commercial lines of credit
 

 

 
822

 

SBA commercial term
 
331

 
1

 
659

 
1

Total
 
$
1,950

 
$
7

 
$
4,396

 
$
25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents information on the recorded investment in impaired loans by portfolio segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest
Income
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest
Income
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
266

 
$

 
$
336

 
$
5

Residential property
 
274

 

 

 

SBA property
 
1,329

 
16

 
1,973

 
48

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
124

 
6

 
702

 
13

Commercial lines of credit
 
7

 

 
1,083

 

SBA commercial term
 
420

 
7

 
715

 
4

Total
 
$
2,420

 
$
29

 
$
4,809

 
$
70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following presents a summary of interest foregone on impaired loans for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Interest income that would have been recognized had impaired loans performed in accordance with their original terms
 
$
34

 
$
54

 
$
163

 
$
186

Less: interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
 
(8
)
 
(25
)
 
(63
)
 
(95
)
Interest income foregone on impaired loans
 
$
26

 
$
29

 
$
100

 
$
91

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

24



Troubled Debt Restructurings
A TDR is a restructuring in which the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. The restructuring of a loan includes, but is not limited to: (i) the transfer from the borrower to the Company of real estate, receivables from third parties, other assets, or an equity interest in full or partial satisfaction of the loan, (ii) a modification of the loan terms, such as a reduction of the stated interest rate, principal, or accrued interest or an extension of the maturity date at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or (iii) a combination of the above. A loan extended or renewed at a stated interest rate equal to the current interest rate for new debt with similar risk is not to be reported as a restructured loan.
The following table presents the composition of loans that were modified as TDRs by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
 
Accruing
 
Nonaccrual
 
Total
 
Accruing
 
Nonaccrual
 
Total
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$

 
$
234

 
$
234

 
$

 
$
318

 
$
318

SBA property
 
319

 

 
319

 
334

 
1,039

 
1,373

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
80

 

 
80

 
195

 
4

 
199

Commercial lines of credit
 

 

 

 

 
10

 
10

SBA commercial term
 
68

 
224

 
292

 
63

 
304

 
367

Total
 
$
467

 
$
458

 
$
925

 
$
592

 
$
1,675

 
$
2,267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no new loans that were modified as TDRs. The following table presents new loans that were modified as TDRs by portfolio segment during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Number of Loans
 
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
 
Number of Loans
 
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 

 
$

 
$

 
1

 
$
312

 
$
312

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 

 

 

 
1

 
7

 
7

Total
 

 
$

 
$

 
2

 
$
319

 
$
319

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Company had no commitments to lend to customers with outstanding loans that were classified as TDRs as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses related to TDRs depends on the collectability of principal and interest, according to the modified repayment terms. Loans that were modified as TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment and the Company allocated $155 thousand and $208 thousand of allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

25



During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no loans that were modified as TDRs for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification. The following table presents information on loans that were modified as TDRs for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Number of Loans
 
Recorded Investment at Date of Default
 
Number of Loans
 
Recorded Investment at Date of Default
Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SBA commercial term
 
2

 
$
233

 
1

 
$
2

Total
 
2

 
$
233

 
1

 
$
2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases, Sales, and Transfers
The Company did not transfer any loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale during the three months ended September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company transferred $1.1 million of commercial property loans and $6.0 million of residential property loans. The Company did not transfer any loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company had no sales or purchases of loans held-for-investment during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Loans Held-For-Sale
The following table presents a composition of loans held-for-sale as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
1,660

 
$

Residential property
 

 
270

SBA property
 
9,834

 
3,491

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
SBA commercial term
 
1,463

 
1,536

Total
 
$
12,957

 
$
5,297

 
 
 
 
 
Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. When a determination is made at the time of commitment to originate as held-for-investment, it is the Company’s intent to hold these loans to maturity or for the "foreseeable future," subject to periodic reviews under the Company’s management evaluation processes, including asset/liability management and credit risk management. When the Company subsequently changes its intent to hold certain loans, the loans are transferred to held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value. Certain loans are transferred to held-for-sale with write-downs to allowance for loan losses.

26



Note 5 - Servicing Assets
At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, total servicing assets were $8.1 million and $9.0 million, respectively. Underlying loans being serviced at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 totaled $534.0 million and $543.3 million, respectively. The Company sold loans of $23.1 million and $29.5 million, respectively, with the servicing rights retained and recognized a net gain on sale of $1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company sold loans of $71.5 million and $98.1 million, respectively, with the servicing rights retained and recognized a net gain on sale of $4.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively. Loan servicing income was $578 thousand and $674 thousand, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 and $1.8 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
All classes of servicing assets are measured using the amortization method and evaluated for impairment quarterly by comparing the fair value of the servicing right to the carrying amount. Fair value is estimated by stratifying the loans sold between mortgage and non-mortgage loans and discounting estimated future cash flows from the servicing assets using discount rates that approximate current market rates over the expected lives of the loans being serviced. For the purposes of measuring impairment, the Company has identified each servicing asset with the underlying loan being serviced, and a valuation allowance is recorded when the fair value is below the carrying amount. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $4 thousand on residential property loan servicing assets and reversed a valuation allowance of $63 thousand that was previously recorded on SBA property loan servicing assets. No valuation allowance was recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.
The following table presents the composition of servicing assets with key assumptions used to estimate the fair value:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
Carrying amount
 
$
260

 
$
6,741

 
$
1,113

 
$
308

 
$
7,369

 
$
1,296

Fair value
 
$
260

 
$
7,079

 
$
1,225

 
$
346

 
$
7,991

 
$
1,400

Discount rates
 
11.25
%
 
13.25
%
 
12.75
%
 
10.50
%
 
13.25
%
 
12.75
%
Prepayment speeds
 
32.00
%
 
14.00
%
 
13.10
%
 
25.60
%
 
10.50
%
 
10.60
%
Weighted average remaining life
 
25.2 years

 
21.8 years

 
7.7 years

 
25.7 years

 
22.1 years

 
8.2 years

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents activity in servicing assets for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
285

 
$
6,940

 
$
1,165

 
$
349

 
$
7,164

 
$
1,288

Additions
 

 
297

 
55

 

 
494

 
165

Amortization
 
(21
)
 
(559
)
 
(107
)
 
(28
)
 
(376
)
 
(117
)
Reversal of impairment (Impairment)
 
(4
)
 
63

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period
 
$
260

 
$
6,741

 
$
1,113

 
$
321

 
$
7,282

 
$
1,336

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table presents activity in servicing assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
 
Residential Property
 
SBA Property
 
SBA Commercial Term
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
308

 
$
7,369

 
$
1,296

 
$
408

 
6,693

 
1,201

Additions
 
22

 
865

 
189

 

 
1,766

 
488

Amortization
 
(66
)
 
(1,493
)
 
(372
)
 
(87
)
 
(1,177
)
 
(353
)
Impairment
 
(4
)
 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period
 
$
260

 
$
6,741

 
$
1,113

 
$
321

 
7,282

 
1,336

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

27



Note 6 - Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank and Other Borrowings
Borrowings from FHLB
The Company had $30.0 million and $40.0 million in borrowings from FHLB at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Borrowings from FHLB consisted of fixed interest rates with original maturity terms ranging from 2 to 5 years and weighted-average interest rate of 1.81% at September 30, 2018. At December 31, 2017, borrowings from FHLB consisted of fixed interest rates with original maturity terms ranging from 1 to 5 years and weighted-average interest rate of 1.71%. Each borrowing is payable at its maturity date. Borrowings paid early are subject to a prepayment penalty.
At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, loans pledged to secure borrowings from the FHLB were $776.5 million and $711.8 million, respectively. The Company’s investment in capital stock of the FHLB of San Francisco totaled $7.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The Company had additional borrowing capacity of $374.8 million and $311.0 million, respectively, from the FHLB as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Other Borrowing Arrangements
At September 30, 2018, the Company had $49.9 million of unused borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve Discount Window, to which the Company pledged loans with a carrying value of $56.4 million with no outstanding borrowings. In addition, the Company may borrow up to approximately $60.0 million overnight federal funds lines on an unsecured basis with correspondent banks at September 30, 2018.
Note 7 - Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock
On August 14, 2018, the Company issued and sold 2,385,000 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $20.00 in an underwritten public offering, for gross proceeds of approximately $47.7 million. The underwriters were granted a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 357,750 shares of common stock at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discount. Concurrently with the initial public offering, the Company's common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "PCB."
On September 5, 2018, the Company issued an additional 123,234 shares of its common stock upon the exercise by the underwriters of a portion of their 30-day option, for additional gross proceeds of approximately $2.5 million.
Aggregate net proceeds from the offering were $45.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted solely of the change in unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale, net of taxes. Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income either as a gain or loss. The following table presents changes to accumulated other comprehensive loss for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
$
(2,612
)
 
$
(466
)
 
$
(1,223
)
 
$
(531
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period
 
(604
)
 
9

 
(2,564
)
 
120

Tax effect of current period changes
 
176

 
(3
)
 
747

 
(49
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
(428
)
 
6

 
(1,817
)
 
71

Balance at end of period
 
$
(3,040
)
 
$
(460
)
 
$
(3,040
)
 
$
(460
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

28



Note 8 - Share-Based Compensation
On July 25, 2013, the Company adopted 2013 Equity Based Stock Compensation Plan ("2013 EBSC Plan") approved by its shareholders to replace the 2003 Stock Option Plan. The 2013 EBSC Plan provided for options to purchase 1,114,942 shares of common stock at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock. As of September 30, 2018, there were 606,896 shares available for future grants.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $147 thousand and $175 thousand, respectively, and realized income tax benefits of $13 thousand and $22 thousand, respectively, related to share-based compensation in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $486 thousand and $522 thousand, respectively, and realized income tax benefits of $38 thousand and $64 thousand, respectively, related to share-based compensation. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had unrecognized share-based compensation expense of $1.6 million related to outstanding stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.56 years.
Stock Options
The Company has issued stock options to certain employees, officers and directors. Stock options are issued at the closing market price on the grant date, and generally have a three-to five-year vesting period and contractual terms of ten years.
The following table represents stock option activity as of and for three months ended September 30, 2018:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
($ in thousands except per share data)
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
 
Weighted-Average Contractual Term
 
Aggregated Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of period
 
928,327

 
$
9.55

 
6.93 years
 
$
7,239

Exercised
 
(29,466
)
 
$
6.23

 
5.16 years
 
 
Forfeited
 
(6,050
)
 
$
10.33

 
7.08 years
 
 
Balance at end of period
 
892,811

 
$
9.66

 
6.73 years
 
$
8,646

Exercisable at end of period
 
289,575

 
$
6.52

 
5.15 years
 
$
3,711

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table represents stock option activity as of and for nine months ended September 30, 2018:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
($ in thousands except per share data)
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
 
Weighted-Average Contractual Term
 
Aggregated Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of period
 
859,635

 
$
8.84

 
7.10 years
 
$
6,155

Granted
 
90,000

 
$
14.95

 
9.38 years
 
 
Exercised
 
(46,781
)
 
$
5.54

 
4.87 years
 
 
Forfeited
 
(10,043
)
 
$
9.96

 
6.58 years
 
 
Balance at end of period
 
892,811

 
$
9.66

 
6.73 years
 
$
8,646

Exercisable at end of period
 
289,575

 
$
6.52

 
5.15 years
 
$
3,711

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

29



The following table represents information regarding unvested stock options as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
 
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding at beginning of period
 
613,286

 
$
11.17

 
578,154

 
$
9.96

Granted
 

 


 
90,000

 
$
14.95

Vested
 
(4,000
)
 
$
14.00

 
(57,271
)
 
$
5.29

Forfeited
 
(6,050
)
 
$
9.96

 
(7,647
)
 
$
9.96

Balance at end of period
 
603,236

 
$
11.16

 
603,236

 
$
11.16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 9 - Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $2.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, and the effective tax rate was 30.1% and 42.1%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, income tax expense was $7.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively, and the effective tax rate was 29.9% and 42.3%, respectively. The decrease in effective tax rate was mainly due to a decrease in the federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of H.R. 1, originally known (and referred to below) as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became effective on January 1, 2018.
At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, or accrued interest or penalties. In the event the Company is assessed interest and/or penalties by federal or state tax authorities, such amounts will be classified in the consolidated financial statements as income tax expense.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to the assessment of U.S. federal income tax for years before 2014. The statute of limitations for the assessment of California Franchise taxes has expired for tax years before 2013 (other state income and franchise tax statutes of limitations vary by state).
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted into law and brought with it significant changes to the U.S Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that impact corporate taxation requirements. At September 30, 2018, the Company did not have any material adjustments to the items previously recorded at year-end 2017 related to the tax reform legislation. At December 31, 2017, the Company early adopted ASU 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income," which allowed a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. As a result of the adoption, the Company recorded a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $242 thousand and an increase in retained earnings for the same amount to eliminate the stranded tax effects at that date from the reduction in the federal statutory tax rate that was enacted in December 22, 2017 and became effective January 1, 2018.

30



Note 10 - Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of net income and shares outstanding to the income and number of share used to compute earnings per share for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands, except per share)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
6,543

 
$
4,806

 
$
17,569

 
$
14,064

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
 
14,730,120

 
13,412,407

 
13,865,190

 
13,405,413

Basic earnings per share
 
$
0.44

 
$
0.36

 
$
1.27

 
$
1.05

Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
6,543

 
$
4,806

 
$
17,569

 
$
14,064

Weighted-average commons shares outstanding
 
14,730,120

 
13,412,407

 
13,865,190

 
13,405,413

Diluted effect of stock options
 
194,426

 
132,448

 
186,371

 
125,037

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
 
14,924,546

 
13,544,855

 
14,051,561

 
13,530,450

Diluted earnings per share
 
$
0.44

 
$
0.35

 
$
1.25

 
$
1.04

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There were no stock options excluded in computing diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive for three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into financial commitments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial commitments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Those instruments involve to varying degrees, elements of credit, and interest rate risk not recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had the following outstanding financial commitments whose contractual amount represents credit risk:
($ in thousands)
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Commitments to extend credit
 
$
118,764

 
$
109,835

Standby letters of credit
 
4,613

 
3,309

Commercial letters of credit
 
777

 
233

Total
 
$
124,154

 
$
113,377

 
 
 
 
 
The Company’s exposure to loan loss in the event of nonperformance on commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for the loans reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The Company maintained reserve for off-balance sheet items of $123 thousand and $121 thousand, respectively, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each client’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.
As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had operating lease commitments of $11.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively.
Litigation
The Company is involved in various matters of litigation, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of pending matters of litigation will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

31



Note 12 - Regulatory Matters
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks ("Basel III rules") became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019.
Under the Basel III rules, the Company must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in from 0.0% for 2015 to 2.50% by 2019. Management believes as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. The Company and the Bank's capital conservation buffer was 9.12% and 8.93%, respectively, as of September 30, 2018, and 5.20% and 5.12%, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
The following table presents the regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank as of dates indicated:
 
 
Actual
 
Minimum Capital Requirement
 
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Provisions
($ in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pacific City Financial Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
$
204,865

 
16.1
%
 
$
57,334

 
4.5
%
 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
218,085

 
17.1
%
 
101,927

 
8.0
%
 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
204,865

 
16.1
%
 
76,445

 
6.0
%
 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
204,865

 
12.6
%
 
65,062

 
4.0
%
 
 N/A

 
 N/A

Pacific City Bank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
$
202,464

 
15.9
%
 
$
57,332

 
4.5
%
 
$
82,813

 
6.5
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
215,684

 
16.9
%
 
101,923

 
8.0
%
 
127,404

 
10.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
202,464

 
15.9
%
 
76,442

 
6.0
%
 
101,923

 
8.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
202,464

 
12.4
%
 
65,060

 
4.0
%
 
81,324

 
5.0
%
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pacific City Financial Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
$
142,370

 
12.2
%
 
$
52,730

 
4.5
%
 
 N/A

 
N/A

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
154,715

 
13.2
%
 
93,766

 
8.0
%
 
 N/A

 
N/A

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
142,370

 
12.2
%
 
70,306

 
6.0
%
 
 N/A

 
N/A

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
142,370

 
10.0
%
 
56,891

 
4.0
%
 
 N/A

 
N/A

Pacific City Bank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
$
141,361

 
12.1
%
 
$
52,747

 
4.5
%
 
$
76,189

 
6.5
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
153,705

 
13.1
%
 
93,723

 
8.0
%
 
117,153

 
10.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
141,361

 
12.1
%
 
70,329

 
6.0
%
 
93,772

 
8.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
141,361

 
9.9
%
 
56,886

 
4.0
%
 
71,107

 
5.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The California Financial Code provides that a bank may not make a cash distribution to its shareholders in excess of the lesser of the bank’s undivided profits or the bank’s net income for its last three fiscal years less the amount of any distribution made to the bank’s shareholder during the same period.

32



As a California corporation, the Company is subject to the limitations of California law, which allows a corporation to distribute cash or property to shareholders, including a dividend or repurchase or redemption of shares, if the corporation meets either a retained earnings test or a “balance sheet” test. Under the retained earnings test, the Company may make a distribution from retained earnings to the extent that its retained earnings exceed the sum of (a) the amount of the distribution plus (b) the amount, if any, of dividends in arrears on shares with preferential dividend rights. The Company may also make a distribution if, immediately after the distribution, the value of its assets equals or exceeds the sum of (a) its total liabilities plus (b) the liquidation preference of any shares which have a preference upon dissolution over the rights of shareholders receiving the distribution. Indebtedness is not considered a liability if the terms of such indebtedness provide that payment of principal and interest thereon are to be made only if, and to the extent that, a distribution to shareholders could be made under the balance sheet test.
The Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the California Department of Business Oversight periodically examine our business, including our compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a banking agency were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we were in violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to assess civil money penalties, to fine or remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance and place us into receivership or conservatorship. Following a recent examination, the Bank entered into an informal agreement in January 2018 with the FDIC and DBO that requires the Bank to take certain steps and improve processes and training relating to Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering laws and regulations, and to improve its monitoring of high rate deposits. While we do not expect this informal agreement to change our business strategy, our failure to comply with the informal agreement could have a negative impact on our business, including our ability to establish new branches or LPOs.


33



Note 13 - Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," and all subsequent ASUs that are related to Topic 606. As stated in Note 1, the implementation of the new standard did not have a material impact on the measurement, timing, or recognition of revenue. Accordingly, no cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was deemed necessary. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.
Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as gain or loss associated with mortgage servicing assets and financial guarantees are also not within the scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest income such as deposit related fees, interchange fees, and merchant related income. However, the recognition of these revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606. Noninterest income considered to be within the scope of Topic 606 is discussed below.
Service charges and fees on deposits: Deposit account service charges consist of monthly service fees, account analysis fees, non-sufficient funds ("NSF") charges and other deposit related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. NSF charges, and other deposit account service charges are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time as incurred.
Debit card fees: When customers use their debit cards to pay merchants for goods or services, the Company retains a fee from the funds collected from the related deposit account and transfers the remaining funds to the payment network for remittance to the merchant. The performance obligation to the merchant is satisfied and the fee is recognized at the point in time when the funds are collected and transferred to the payment network.
Gain (loss) on sale of other real estate owned: The Company's performance obligation for sale of OREO is the transfer of title and ownership rights of the OREO to the buyer, which occurs at the settlement date when the sale proceeds are received and income is recognized.
Wire transfer fees and other service charges: Wire transfer fees and other service charges are transaction based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time as incurred.
The following table presents revenue from contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606 for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Noninterest Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In scope of Topic 606
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges and fees on deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Monthly service fees
 
$
28

 
$
24

 
$
80

 
$
75

Account analysis fees
 
243

 
231

 
719

 
674

Non-sufficient funds charges
 
82

 
57

 
235

 
204

Other deposit related fees
 
24

 
21

 
68

 
67

Total service charges and fees on deposits
 
377

 
333

 
1,102

 
1,020

Debit card fees
 
62

 
56

 
157

 
153

Gain (loss) on sale of other real estate owned
 

 
(4
)
 
3

 
(10
)
Wire transfer fees
 
122

 
113

 
348

 
321

Other service charges
 
52

 
57

 
165

 
148

Total noninterest income in-scope of Topic 606
 
$
613

 
$
555

 
$
1,775

 
$
1,632

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note 14 - Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated the effects of events that have occurred subsequent to September 30, 2018 through the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements (unaudited). There have been no material events that would require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements or in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

34



Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the major factors that influenced our results of operations and financial condition as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were included in our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2018 (333-226208) and declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2018 and with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and general practices within the banking industry. Within these financial statements, certain financial information contains approximate measurements of financial effects of transactions and impacts at the consolidated statements of financial condition dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods. As certain accounting policies require significant estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the Company has established critical accounting policies to facilitate making the judgment necessary to prepare financial statements. For a detailed discussion, refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 that were included in its registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2018 (333-226208) and declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2018.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses when we believe the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses. We estimate the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off. Amounts are charged-off when available information confirms that specific loans or portions thereof, are uncollectible. This methodology for determining charge-offs is consistently applied to each segment.
The Company determines a separate allowance for each portfolio segment. The allowance consists of specific and general reserves. Specific reserves relate to loans that are individually classified as impaired. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting all amounts when due. Measurement of impairment is based on the expected future cash flows of an impaired loan, which are to be discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or measured by reference to an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral for a collateral-dependent loan. The Company selects the measurement method on a loan-by-loan basis except that collateral-dependent loans for which foreclosure is probable are measured at the fair value of the collateral.
The Company recognizes interest income on impaired loans based on its existing methods of recognizing interest income on nonaccrual loans. Loans, for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered TDRs and classified as impaired with measurement of impairment as described above.
If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
General reserves cover non-impaired loans and are based on our historical loss rates for each portfolio segment, adjusted for the effects of qualitative factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the portfolio segment’s historical loss experience. Qualitative factors include consideration of the following: changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; changes in the volume and severity of past due, nonaccrual and other adversely graded loans; changes in the loan review system; changes in the value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans; concentrations of credit and the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements.

35



Selected Financial Data
The following table presents certain selected financial data as of the dates or for the periods indicated:
 
 
As of or For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
As of or For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands, except per share data)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Selected balance sheet data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
164,056

 
$
87,866

 
$
164,056

 
$
87,866

Securities available-for-sale
 
135,089

 
123,170

 
135,089

 
123,170

Securities held-to-maturity
 
21,991

 
19,720

 
21,991

 
19,720

Loans held-for-sale
 
12,957

 
2,501

 
12,957

 
2,501

Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan costs (fees)
 
1,309,124

 
1,146,744

 
1,309,124

 
1,146,744

Allowance for loan losses
 
(13,097
)
 
(11,651
)
 
(13,097
)
 
(11,651
)
Total assets
 
1,663,787

 
1,403,816

 
1,663,787

 
1,403,816

Total deposits
 
1,419,526

 
1,213,274

 
1,419,526

 
1,213,274

Shareholders' equity
 
202,938

 
140,541

 
202,938

 
140,541

Selected income statement data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
 
$
21,496

 
$
17,090

 
$
60,468

 
$
47,396

Interest expense
 
4,780

 
2,707

 
12,576

 
7,159

Net interest income
 
16,716

 
14,383

 
47,892

 
40,237

Provision for loan losses
 
417

 
586

 
937

 
114

Noninterest income
 
2,580

 
3,461

 
8,215

 
10,532

Noninterest expense
 
9,520

 
8,958

 
30,091

 
26,275

Income before income taxes
 
9,359

 
8,300

 
25,079

 
24,380

Income tax expense
 
2,816

 
3,494

 
7,510

 
10,316

Net income
 
6,543

 
4,806

 
17,569

 
14,064

Per share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per common share, basic
 
$
0.44

 
$
0.36

 
$
1.27

 
$
1.05

Earnings per common share, diluted
 
0.44

 
0.35

 
1.25

 
1.04

Book value per common share (1)
 
12.71

 
10.48

 
12.71

 
10.48

Cash dividends declared per common share
 
0.03

 
0.03

 
0.09

 
0.09

Outstanding share data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of common shares outstanding
 
15,972,914

 
13,413,059

 
15,972,914

 
13,413,059

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic
 
14,730,120

 
13,412,407

 
13,865,190

 
13,405,413

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted
 
14,924,546

 
13,544,855

 
14,051,561

 
13,530,450

Selected performance ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on average assets (2)
 
1.60
%
 
1.38
%
 
1.50
%
 
1.43
%
Return on average shareholders' equity (2)
 
14.50
%
 
13.69
%
 
14.85
%
 
13.98
%
Dividend payout ratio (3)
 
6.82
%
 
8.33
%
 
7.09
%
 
8.57
%
Efficiency ratio (4)
 
49.34
%
 
50.20
%
 
53.63
%
 
51.75
%
Yield on average interest-earning assets (2)
 
5.36
%
 
5.04
%
 
5.29
%
 
4.95
%
Cost of funds (2)
 
1.32
%
 
0.87
%
 
1.21
%
 
0.82
%
Net interest spread (2)
 
3.64
%
 
3.86
%
 
3.73
%
 
3.85
%
Net interest margin (2), (5)
 
4.17
%
 
4.24
%
 
4.19
%
 
4.20
%
Total loans to total deposits ratio (6)
 
93.14
%
 
94.72
%
 
93.14
%
 
94.72
%

36



 
 
As of or For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
As of or For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands, except per share data)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Asset quality:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing
 
$
763

 
$
1,628

 
$
763

 
$
1,628

Nonperforming loans (7)
 
1,572

 
1,511

 
1,572

 
1,511

Nonperforming assets (8)
 
1,572

 
1,652

 
1,572

 
1,652

Net charge-offs (recoveries)
 
(59
)
 
(36
)
 
64

 
(217
)
Loans 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing to loans held-for-investment
 
0.06
 %
 
0.14
 %
 
0.06
%
 
0.14
 %
Nonperforming loans to loans held-for-investment
 
0.12
 %
 
0.13
 %
 
0.12
%
 
0.13
 %
Nonperforming loans to allowance for loan losses
 
12.00
 %
 
12.97
 %
 
12.00
%
 
12.97
 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets
 
0.09
 %
 
0.12
 %
 
0.09
%
 
0.12
 %
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-for-investment
 
1.00
 %
 
1.02
 %
 
1.00
%
 
1.02
 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
 
833.14
 %
 
771.08
 %
 
833.14
%
 
771.08
 %
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans held-for-investment (2)
 
(0.02
)%
 
(0.01
)%
 
0.01
%
 
(0.03
)%
Capital ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shareholders' equity to total assets
 
12.20
 %
 
10.01
 %
 
12.20
%
 
10.01
 %
Average equity to average assets
 
11.03
 %
 
10.10
 %
 
10.13
%
 
10.25
 %
Pacific City Financial Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
16.1
 %
 
12.4
 %
 
16.1
%
 
12.4
 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
17.1
 %
 
13.4
 %
 
17.1
%
 
13.4
 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
16.1
 %
 
12.4
 %
 
16.1
%
 
12.4
 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
12.6
 %
 
10.2
 %
 
12.6
%
 
10.2
 %
Pacific City Bank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
15.9
 %
 
12.3
 %
 
15.9
%
 
12.3
 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
16.9
 %
 
13.3
 %
 
16.9
%
 
13.3
 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
15.9
 %
 
12.3
 %
 
15.9
%
 
12.3
 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
12.4
 %
 
10.1
 %
 
12.4
%
 
10.1
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Shareholders' equity divided by common shares outstanding.
(2)
Annualized.
(3)
Dividends declared per common share divided by basic earnings per common share.
(4)
Noninterest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.
(5)
Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
(6)
Total loans include both loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment, net of unearned loan costs (fees).
(7)
Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing.
(8)
Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned.

37



Executive Summary
Net income was $6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $1.7 million, or 36.1%, from $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Diluted earnings per common share was $0.44 and $0.35, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net interest income and decreases in provision for loan losses and income tax expense, partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense and a decrease in noninterest income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net income was $17.6 million, an increase of $3.5 million, or 24.9%, from $14.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Diluted earnings per common share was $1.25 and $1.04 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net interest income and a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by increases in noninterest expense and provision for loan losses and a decrease in noninterest income.
Total assets were $1.66 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $221.8 million, or 15.4%, from $1.44 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents, securities available-for-sale, loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment. The asset growth was supported by the increase in deposits and capital raise discussed below.
During the third quarter of 2018, the Company successfully completed its initial public offering ("IPO") for net proceeds of $45.5 million and its common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "PCB."
Financial Highlights
Net income totaled $6.5 million or $0.44 per diluted common share for the three months ended September 30, 2018;
Total assets were $1.66 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $221.8 million, or 15.4%, from $1.44 billion at December 31, 2017;
Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred costs (fees), were $1.31 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $119.1 million, or 10.0%, from $1.19 billion at December 31, 2017; and
Total deposits were $1.42 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $168.2 million, or 13.4%, from $1.25 billion at December 31, 2017.
Result of Operations
Net Interest Income
A principal component of our earnings is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest and fees earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin. The net interest spread is the yield on average interest earning assets less the cost of average interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by changes in the balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and changes in the yields earned on interest earning assets and the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities.

38



The following table presents interest income, average interest-earning assets, interest expense, average interest-bearing liabilities, and their correspondent yields and costs expressed both in dollars and rates, on a consolidated operations basis, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Yield/Cost (6)
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Yield/Cost (6)
Interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total loans (1)
 
$
1,280,352

 
$
19,699

 
6.10
%
 
$
1,123,725

 
$
16,000

 
5.65
%
U.S. government agencies
 
24,102

 
154

 
2.53
%
 
26,214

 
152

 
2.30
%
Mortgage backed securities
 
69,592

 
414

 
2.36
%
 
60,922

 
312

 
2.03
%
Collateralized mortgage obligation
 
54,094

 
324

 
2.38
%
 
44,771

 
236

 
2.09
%
Municipal securities tax exempt (2)
 
6,232

 
39

 
2.48
%
 
8,057

 
46

 
2.27
%
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
 
149,398

 
742

 
1.97
%
 
74,633

 
236

 
1.25
%
FHLB and other bank stock
 
7,433

 
124

 
6.62
%
 
6,589

 
108

 
6.50
%
Total interest-earning assets
 
1,591,203

 
21,496

 
5.36
%
 
1,344,911

 
17,090

 
5.04
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
18,596

 
 
 
 
 
17,414

 
 
 
 
Allowances for loan losses
 
(12,774
)
 
 
 
 
 
(11,327
)
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
26,828

 
 
 
 
 
28,019

 
 
 
 
Total noninterest earning assets
 
32,650

 
 
 
 
 
34,106

 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,623,853

 
 
 
 
 
$
1,379,017

 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MMDA and Super NOW
 
$
269,514

 
834

 
1.23
%
 
$
322,714

 
842

 
1.04
%
Savings
 
8,717

 
6

 
0.27
%
 
9,094

 
6

 
0.26
%
Time deposits
 
795,202

 
3,803

 
1.90
%
 
538,359

 
1,686

 
1.24
%
Borrowings
 
30,000

 
137

 
1.81
%
 
40,000

 
173

 
1.72
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
1,103,433

 
4,780

 
1.72
%
 
910,167

 
2,707

 
1.18
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
330,021

 
 
 
 
 
320,153

 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
 
11,325

 
 
 
 
 
9,407

 
 
 
 
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
 
341,346

 
 
 
 
 
329,560

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities
 
1,444,779

 
 
 
 
 
1,239,727

 
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity
 
179,074

 
 
 
 
 
139,290

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,623,853

 
 
 
 
 
$
1,379,017

 
 
 
 
Net interest income
 
 
 
$
16,716

 
 
 
 
 
$
14,383

 
 
Net interest spread (3)
 
 
 
 
 
3.64
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.86
%
Net interest margin (4)
 
 
 
 
 
4.17
%
 
 
 
 
 
4.24
%
Cost of funds (5)
 
 
 
 
 
1.32
%
 
 
 
 
 
0.87
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Average balance includes both loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment, as well as nonaccrual loans. Net amortization of deferred loan fees (cost) of $109 thousand and $191 thousand are included in the interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)
The yield on municipal bonds has not been computed on a tax-equivalent basis.
(3)
Net interest spread is calculated by subtracting average rate on interest-bearing liabilities from average yield on interest-earning assets.
(4)
Net interest margin is calculated by dividing annualized net interest income by average interest-earning assets.
(5)
Cost of funds is calculated by dividing annualized interest expense on deposits by the sum of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
(6)
Annualized.

39



The following table presents interest income, average interest-earning assets, interest expense, average interest-bearing liabilities, and their correspondent yields and costs expressed both in dollars and rates, on a consolidated operations basis, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
($ in thousands)
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Yield/ Cost (6)
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Yield/ Cost (6)
Interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total loans (1)
 
$
1,245,551

 
$
55,749

 
5.98
%
 
$
1,086,050

 
$
44,684

 
5.50
%
U.S. government agencies
 
23,887

 
432

 
2.42
%
 
24,569

 
427

 
2.32
%
Mortgage backed securities
 
67,602

 
1,183

 
2.34
%
 
53,996

 
778

 
1.93
%
Collateralized mortgage obligation
 
52,519

 
913

 
2.32
%
 
32,879

 
495

 
2.01
%
Municipal securities tax exempt (2)
 
6,454

 
120

 
2.49
%
 
8,540

 
142

 
2.22
%
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
 
125,396

 
1,718

 
1.83
%
 
67,398

 
536

 
1.06
%
FHLB and other bank stock
 
7,087

 
353

 
6.66
%
 
6,216

 
334

 
7.18
%
Total interest-earning assets
 
1,528,496

 
60,468

 
5.29
%
 
1,279,648

 
47,396

 
4.95
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
19,145

 
 
 
 
 
$
16,816

 
 
 
 
Allowances for loan losses
 
(12,530
)
 
 
 
 
 
(11,357
)
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
27,115

 
 
 
 
 
27,439

 
 
 
 
Total noninterest earning assets
 
33,730

 
 
 
 
 
32,898

 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,562,226

 
 
 
 
 
$
1,312,546

 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MMDA and Super NOW
 
282,221

 
2,367

 
1.12
%
 
322,879

 
2,431

 
1.01
%
Savings
 
8,696

 
18

 
0.28
%
 
8,874

 
18

 
0.27
%
Time deposits
 
747,102

 
9,716

 
1.74
%
 
523,534

 
4,534

 
1.16
%
Borrowings
 
36,557

 
475

 
1.74
%
 
13,773

 
176

 
1.71
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
1,074,576

 
12,576

 
1.56
%
 
869,060

 
7,159

 
1.10
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
319,697

 
 
 
 
 
300,360

 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
 
9,759

 
 
 
 
 
8,654

 
 
 
 
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
 
329,456

 
 
 
 
 
309,014

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities
 
1,404,032

 
 
 
 
 
1,178,074

 
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity
 
158,194

 
 
 
 
 
134,472

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,562,226

 
 
 
 
 
$
1,312,546

 
 
 
 
Net interest income
 
 
 
$
47,892

 
 
 
 
 
$
40,237

 
 
Net interest spread (3)
 
 
 
 
 
3.73
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.85
%
Net interest margin (4)
 
 
 
 
 
4.19
%
 
 
 
 
 
4.20
%
Cost of funds (5)
 
 
 
 
 
1.21
%
 
 
 
 
 
0.82
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Average balance includes both loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment, as well as nonaccrual loans. Net amortization of deferred loan fees (cost) of $371 thousand and $453 thousand are included in the interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)
The yield on municipal bonds has not been computed on a tax-equivalent basis.
(3)
Net interest spread is calculated by subtracting average rate on interest-bearing liabilities from average yield on interest-earning assets.
(4)
Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets.
(5)
Cost of funds is calculated by dividing annualized interest expense on deposits by the sum of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
(6)
Annualized.

40



The following table presents the changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume multiplied by the prior rate; and (ii) changes in rate multiplied by the prior volume. Changes attributable to both rate and volume which cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 vs. 2017
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 vs. 2017
 
 
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
Net Increase (Decrease)
 
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
Net Increase (Decrease)
($ in thousands)
 
Volume
 
Rate
 
 
Volume
 
Rate
 
Interest earned on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total loans
 
$
2,230

 
$
1,469

 
$
3,699

 
$
6,562

 
$
4,503

 
$
11,065

Investment securities
 
75

 
110

 
185

 
468

 
338

 
806

Other interest-earning assets
 
320

 
202

 
522

 
696

 
505

 
1,201

Total interest income
 
2,625

 
1,781

 
4,406

 
7,726

 
5,346

 
13,072

Interest paid on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Savings, NOW, and money market deposits
 
(137
)
 
129

 
(8
)
 
(301
)
 
237

 
(64
)
Time deposits
 
804

 
1,313

 
2,117

 
1,936

 
3,246

 
5,182

Other borrowings
 
(43
)
 
7

 
(36
)
 
291

 
8

 
299

Total interest expense
 
624

 
1,449

 
2,073

 
1,926

 
3,491

 
5,417

Change in net interest income
 
$
2,001

 
$
332

 
$
2,333

 
$
5,800

 
$
1,855

 
$
7,655

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net interest income was $16.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $2.3 million, or 16.2%, from $14.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an 18.3% increase in average balance of interest-earning assets and a 32 basis point increase in average yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a 21.2% increase in average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and a 54 basis point increase in average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in average balance of interest-earning assets was primarily due to growth in the loan and investment security portfolios, as well as other interest-earning assets, supported by deposit growth and the recent capital raise. The increases in average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities were primarily due to the current rising interest rate environment.
For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, net interest margin was 4.17% and 4.24%, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of higher market rates on deposits and competition in our deposit target markets, as well as increases in average balances of lower yielding interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and investment securities.
Interest Income. Total interest income was $21.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $4.4 million, or 25.8%, from $17.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average yield on total interest-earning assets was 5.36% and 5.04%, respectively.
Interest and fees on loans was $19.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $3.7 million, or 23.1%, from $16.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 13.9% increase in average balance and a 45 basis point increase in average yield. The increase in average balance was primarily due to organic loan growth across the entire loan portfolio. The increase in average yield was primarily due to the increase in market rates. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average yield on total loans was 6.10% and 5.65%, respectively.
Interest on investment securities was $931 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $185 thousand, or 24.8%, from $746 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 10.0% increase in average balance and a 29 basis point increase in average yield. We purchased $4.0 million of securities held-to-maturity and $39.5 million of securities available-for-sale since September 30, 2017. These purchases increased our average yield as these securities were purchased in a higher market rate environment. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average yield on total securities was 2.40% and 2.11%, respectively.

41



Interest income on other interest-earning assets was $866 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $522 thousand, or 151.7%, from $344 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 93.1% increase in average balance and a 56 basis point increase in average yield. The increase in average balance was primarily due to net proceeds from the Company's initial public offering. The increase in average yield was primarily due to an increase in the federal funds rate. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, yield on total other interest-earning assets was 2.19% and 1.68%, respectively.
Interest Expense. Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities was $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $2.1 million, or 76.6%, from $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on total interest-bearing liabilities was 1.72% and 1.18%, respectively.
Interest expense on deposits was $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $2.1 million, or 83.2%, from $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 23.4% increase in average balance and a 56 basis point increase in average cost. The increase in average balance was primarily due to an increase in time deposits, partially offset by a decrease in MMDA and Super NOW accounts. The increase in average cost was primarily due to the impact of higher market rates on deposits and competition in our deposit target markets. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on interest-bearing deposits was 1.72% and 1.16%, respectively.
Interest expense on other borrowings was $137 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $36 thousand from $173 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The Bank has utilized borrowings from FHLB since June 2017 for liquidity management. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Bank did not renew the maturing borrowings of $10.0 million as the Bank maintained a sufficient level of on-balance sheet liquidity. For the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on other borrowings was 1.81% and 1.72%, respectively.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net interest income was $47.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $7.7 million, or 19.0%, from $40.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 19.4% increase in average balance of interest-earning assets and a 34 basis point increase in average yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a 23.6% increase in average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and a 46 basis point increase in average cost on interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in average balance was primarily due to growth in the loan and investment security portfolios, as well as other interest-earning assets, supported by deposit growth and capital raise. The increases in average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities were primarily due to the current rising interest rate environment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, net interest margin was 4.19% and 4.20%, respectively.
Interest Income. Total interest income was $60.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $13.1 million, or 27.6%, from $47.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average yield on total interest-earning assets was 5.29% and 4.95%, respectively.
Interest and fees on loans was $55.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $11.1 million, or 23.1%, from $44.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 14.7% increase in average balance and a 48 basis point increase in average yield. The increase in average balance was primarily due to organic loan growth across the entire loan portfolio. The increase in average yield was primarily due to the increase in market rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, yield on total loans was 5.98% and 5.50%, respectively.
Interest on investment securities was $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $806 thousand, or 43.8%, from $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 25.4% increase in average balance and a 30 basis point increase in average yield. We purchased $4.0 million of securities held-to-maturity and $39.5 million of securities available-for-sale since September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, yield on total securities was 2.35% and 2.05%, respectively.
Interest income on other interest-earning assets was $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $1.2 million, or 138.0%, from $870 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 80.0% increase in average balance and a 51 basis point increase in average yield. The increase in average balance was primarily due to placing higher balances into the interest-bearing account at the Federal Reserve Bank. The increase in average yield was primarily due to an increase in the federal funds rate. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, yield on total other interest-earning assets was 2.09% and 1.58%, respectively.

42



Interest Expense. Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities was $12.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $5.4 million, or 75.7%, from $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on total interest-bearing liabilities was 1.56% and 1.10%, respectively.
Interest expense on deposits was $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $5.1 million, or 73.3%, from $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a 21.4% increase in average balance and a 47 basis point increase in average cost. The increase in average balance was primarily due to an increases in time deposits, partially offset by a decrease in MMDA and Super NOW accounts. The increase in average cost was primarily due to the impact of higher market rates on deposits and competition in our deposit target markets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on interest-bearing deposits was 1.56% and 1.09%, respectively.
Interest expense on other borrowings was $475 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $299 thousand from $176 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Bank has utilized borrowings from FHLB since June 2017 for liquidity management. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Bank did not renew the maturing borrowings of $10.0 million as the Bank maintained a sufficient level of on-balance sheet liquidity. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, average cost on other borrowings was 1.74% and 1.71%, respectively.
Provision for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses was $417 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared with $586 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, provision for loan losses was $937 thousand compared with $114 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increases were primarily due to an increase in loans held-for-investment balance.
See further discussion in "Allowance for Loan Losses."
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income was $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $881 thousand, or 25.5%, from $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, noninterest income was $8.2 million, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 22.0%, from $10.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The following table presents the components of noninterest income for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Service charges and fees on deposits
 
$
377

 
$
333

 
$
1,102

 
$
1,020

Servicing income
 
578

 
674

 
1,789

 
1,841

Gain on sale of loans
 
1,328

 
2,159

 
4,477

 
6,873

Other income
 
297

 
295

 
847

 
798

Total noninterest income
 
$
2,580

 
$
3,461

 
$
8,215

 
$
10,532

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Service charges and fees were $377 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $44 thousand, or 13.2%, from $333 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the level of transactional based deposit accounts.
Loan servicing income was $578 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $96 thousand, or 14.2%, from $674 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to an increased amortization of servicing assets from increased pay-offs of loans being serviced during the three months ended September 30, 2018, partially offset by an increase in servicing income. Servicing income increased due to an increase in average balance of servicing portfolio. Underlying loans being serviced at September 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $534.0 million and $541.3 million, respectively.

43



Gain on sale of loans was $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $831 thousand, or 38.5%, from $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in sales volume and premiums on SBA loans. The Company sold SBA loans of $23.1 million with a gain of $1.3 million and residential property loans of $2.2 million with a gain of $22 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2018. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold SBA loans of $29.5 million with a gain of $2.1 million and residential property loans of $4.3 million with a gain of $34 thousand.
Other income was $297 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $2 thousand, or 0.7%, from $295 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Other income includes wire and remittance fees of $122 thousand and $113 thousand, respectively, and debit card interchange fees of $62 thousand and $56 thousand, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Service charges and fees were $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $82 thousand, or 8.0%, from $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the level of transactional based deposit accounts.
Loan servicing income was $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $52 thousand, or 2.8%, from $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to an increased amortization of servicing assets from increased pay-offs of loans being serviced during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, partially offset by an increase in servicing income. Servicing income increased due to an increase in average balance of servicing portfolio. Underlying loans being serviced at September 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $534.0 million and $541.3 million, respectively.
Gain on sale of loans was $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 34.9%, from $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in sales volume and premiums on SBA loans. The Company sold SBA loans of $65.6 million with a gain of $4.2 million, residential property loans of $10.9 million with a gain of $213 thousand and a commercial property loan of $1.1 million with a gain of $45 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold SBA loans of $98.1 million with a gain of $6.8 million and residential property loans of $10.7 million with a gain of $113 thousand.
Other income was $847 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $49 thousand, or 6.1%, from $798 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Other income includes wire and remittance fees of $348 thousand and $321 thousand, respectively, and debit card interchange fees of $157 thousand and $153 thousand, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

44



Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense was $9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $562 thousand, or 6.3%, from $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, noninterest expense was $30.1 million, an increase of $3.8 million, or 14.5%, from $26.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The following table presents the breakdown of noninterest expense for the periods indicated:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Salaries and employee benefits
 
$
5,840

 
$
5,594

 
$
18,239

 
$
16,689

Occupancy and equipment
 
1,244

 
1,073

 
3,634

 
3,259

Professional fees
 
213

 
445

 
1,724

 
1,341

Marketing and business promotion
 
555

 
500

 
1,484

 
1,220

Data processing
 
314

 
276

 
911

 
786

Director fees and expenses
 
220

 
198

 
661

 
541

Loan related expenses
 
83

 
98

 
205

 
301

Regulatory assessments
 
192

 
108

 
469

 
309

Other expenses
 
859

 
666

 
2,764

 
1,829

Total noninterest expense
 
$
9,520

 
$
8,958

 
$
30,091

 
$
26,275

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Salaries and employee benefits were $5.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $246 thousand, or 4.4%, from $5.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of employees to support continued growth, as well as annual salary increases, partially offset by a reversal of compensation related accrual of $486 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2018. The number of full-time equivalent employees was 246 at September 30, 2018 compared to 229 at September 30, 2017.
Occupancy and equipment expense was $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $171 thousand, or 15.9%, from $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the opening of New York branch in September 2017.
Professional fees were $213 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $232 thousand, or 52.1%, from $445 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in professional fees was primarily due to a true-up of expenses that are directly related to the stock offering during the three months ended September 30, 2018.
Marketing and business promotion expense was $555 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $55 thousand, or 11.0%, from $500 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to continuing efforts to grow our exposure to the market, which we believe would help the growth of our loans and deposits.
Data processing expense was $314 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $38 thousand, or 13.8%, from $276 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the impact of increased processing costs as we expand with a greater number of accounts and transactions.
Director fees and expenses were $220 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $22 thousand, or 11.1%, from $198 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the increase in directors’ fee and an addition of a board member since January 2018.
Loan related expense was $83 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $15 thousand, or 15.3%, from $98 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in SBA guarantee fees paid by the Bank.
Regulatory assessment expense was $192 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $84 thousand, or 77.8%, from $108 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to our year-over-year balance sheet growth.

45



Other expense was $859 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $193 thousand, or 29.0%, from $666 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Other expenses primarily included $467 thousand and $320 thousand in office expense, and $139 thousand and $108 thousand in armed guard expense for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Salaries and employee benefits were $18.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $1.6 million, or 9.3%, from $16.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of employees to support continued growth, as well as annual salary increases, partially offset by a reversal of compensation related accrual of $486 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2018. The number of full-time equivalent employees was 246 at September 30, 2018 compared to 229 at September 30, 2017.
Occupancy and equipment expense was $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $375 thousand, or 11.5%, from $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the opening of a New York branch in September 2017.
Professional fees were $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $383 thousand, or 28.6%, from $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increased consulting and internal audit fees for enhancing the Company's controls and processes during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
Marketing and business promotion expense was $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $264 thousand, or 21.6%, from $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This increase was primarily due to continuing efforts to grow our exposure to the market, which we believe would help the growth of our loans and deposits.
Data processing expense was $911 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $125 thousand, or 15.9%, from $786 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This increase resulted primarily from the impact of increased processing costs as we expand with a greater number of accounts and transactions.
Director fees and expenses were $661 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $120 thousand, or 22.2%, from $541 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the increase in directors’ fee and additions of board members since April 2017 and January 2018.
Loan related expense was $205 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $96 thousand, or 31.9%, from $301 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in SBA guarantee fees paid by the Bank.
Regulatory assessment expense was $469 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $160 thousand, or 51.8%, from $309 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to our year-over-year balance sheet growth.
Other expense was $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $935 thousand, or 51.1%, from $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a reimbursement paid to the SBA and an increase in general operating expense. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the SBA requested us to reimburse it for a SBA loan guarantee previously paid by the SBA on a loan we originated in 2007 that subsequently defaulted, which ultimately was determined to be ineligible for SBA guaranty. We incurred a one-time expense of $577 thousand for this reimbursement and a write-off of certain receivables related to collection activities of the loan. Other than the reimbursement paid to the SBA, other expenses primarily included $1.2 million and $940 thousand in office expense, and $374 thousand and $313 thousand in armed guard expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $2.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, and the effective tax rate was 30.1% and 42.1%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, income tax expense was $7.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively, and the effective tax rate was 29.9% and 42.3%, respectively. The decrease in effective tax rate was mainly due to a decrease in the federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became effective on January 1, 2018.



46



Financial Condition
Investment Securities
Our investment strategy aims to maximize earnings while maintaining liquidity in securities with minimal credit risk. The types and maturities of securities purchased are primarily based on our current and projected liquidity and interest rate sensitivity positions. Investment securities are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale in accordance with GAAP. Investment securities that the Company has the ability and the intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. All other securities are classified as available-for-sale. Investment securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at their estimated fair values with the changes in fair values recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, as a component of stockholders’ equity.
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$
24,372

 
$
23,544

 
$
(828
)
 
$
25,231

 
$
24,925

 
$
(306
)
Municipal bonds
 
789

 
787

 
(2
)
 
2,376

 
2,375

 
(1
)
Mortgage-backed securities
 
58,113

 
56,224

 
(1,889
)
 
52,565

 
51,904

 
(661
)
Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
56,321

 
54,534

 
(1,787
)
 
51,459

 
50,485

 
(974
)
Total securities available-for-sale
 
$
139,595

 
$
135,089

 
$
(4,506
)
 
$
131,631

 
$
129,689

 
$
(1,942
)
Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
5,110

 
5,079

 
(31
)
 
5,263

 
5,439

 
176

Mortgage-backed securities
 
16,881

 
16,038

 
(843
)
 
15,807

 
15,558

 
(249
)
Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
21,991

 
$
21,117

 
$
(874
)
 
$
21,070

 
$
20,997

 
$
(73
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total investment securities were $157.1 million at September 30, 2018, an increase of $6.3 million, or 4.2%, from $150.8 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to purchases of $28.1 million, partially offset by principal paydowns of $18.6 million, net premium amortization of $577 thousand and a decrease in fair value of securities available-for-sale of $2.6 million.
In accordance with FASB ASC 320, Investments - Debt and Equity Securities, the Company performs an OTTI assessment at least on a quarterly basis. OTTI is recognized when fair value is below the amortized cost where: (i) an entity has the intent to sell the security; (ii) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (iii) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.
All individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had an investment grade rating upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not established any cause for default on these securities and various rating agencies have reaffirmed their long-term investment grade status as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. These securities have fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market interest rates fluctuated. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, the unrealized losses on municipal bonds are not considered other-than-temporary impaired, as the bonds are rated investment grade and there are no credit quality concerns with the issuers. Interest payments have been made as scheduled, and management believes this will continue in the future until the bonds get paid in full. The Company determined that the investment securities with unrealized losses for twelve months or more are not other-than-temporary impaired, and, therefore, no impairment was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.


47



The following table presents the contractual maturity schedule for securities, at amortized cost, and their weighted-average yields as of September 30, 2018:
 
 
Within One Year
 
More than One Year through Five Years
 
More than Five Years through Ten Years
 
More than Ten Years
 
Total
($ in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Weighted-Average Yield
 
Amortized Cost
 
Weighted-Average Yield
 
Amortized Cost
 
Weighted-Average Yield
 
Amortized Cost
 
Weighted-Average Yield
 
Amortized Cost
 
Weighted-Average Yield
Securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
$

 
%
 
$

 
%
 
$
3,571

 
2.47
%
 
$
20,801

 
2.42
%
 
$
24,372

 
2.43
%
Municipal bonds
 

 
%
 

 
%
 
789

 
2.70
%
 

 
%
 
789

 
2.70
%
Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
%
 
1,123

 
1.53
%
 
13,997

 
2.21
%
 
42,993

 
2.49
%
 
58,113

 
2.40
%
Collateralized mortgage obligations
 

 
%
 

 
%
 
6,486

 
1.82
%
 
49,835

 
2.61
%
 
56,321

 
2.52
%
Total securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
%
 
$
1,123

 
1.53
%
 
$
24,843

 
2.16
%
 
$
113,629

 
2.53
%
 
$
139,595

 
2.46
%
Securities held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal bonds
 
$
134

 
1.54
%
 
$
1,440

 
2.65
%
 
$
1,220

 
2.92
%
 
$
2,316

 
4.83
%
 
$
5,110

 
3.67
%
Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
%
 
933

 
1.82
%
 
1,568

 
1.90
%
 
14,380

 
2.98
%
 
16,881

 
2.82
%
Total securities held-to-maturity
 
$
134

 
1.54
%
 
$
2,373

 
2.32
%
 
$
2,788

 
2.35
%
 
$
16,696

 
3.24
%
 
$
21,991

 
3.01
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


48



Loans Held-For-Sale
Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. When a determination is made at the time of commitment to originate as held-for-investment, it is the Company’s intent to hold these loans to maturity or for the "foreseeable future," subject to periodic reviews under the Company’s management evaluation processes, including asset/liability management and credit risk management. When the Company subsequently changes its intent to hold certain loans, the loans are transferred to held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value. Certain loans are transferred to held-for-sale with write-downs to allowance for loan losses.
Loans held-for-sale were $13.0 million at September 30, 2018, an increase of $7.7 million, or 144.6%, from $5.3 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to originations of $78.5 million and transfers from loans held-for-investment of $7.0 million, partially offset by sales of $77.6 million.
Loans Held-For-Investment and Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table presents the composition of the Company’s loans held-for-investment as of the dates indicated:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Percentage to Total
 
Amount
 
Percentage to Total
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
703,250

 
53.8
%
 
662,840

 
55.7
%
Residential property
 
215,340

 
16.5
%
 
168,898

 
14.2
%
SBA property
 
126,816

 
9.7
%
 
130,438

 
11.0
%
Construction
 
28,895

 
2.2
%
 
23,215

 
2.0
%
Total real estate loans
 
1,074,301

 
82.2
%
 
985,391

 
82.9
%
Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
96,102

 
7.3
%
 
77,438

 
6.5
%
Commercial lines of credit
 
72,219

 
5.5
%
 
60,850

 
5.1
%
SBA commercial term
 
28,312

 
2.2
%
 
30,199

 
2.5
%
Trade finance
 
10,353

 
0.8
%
 
1,920

 
0.2
%
Total commercial and industrial loans
 
206,986

 
15.8
%
 
170,407

 
14.3
%
Consumer loans
 
27,472

 
2.1
%
 
33,870

 
2.8
%
Loans held-for-investment
 
1,308,759

 
100.1
%
 
1,189,668

 
100.0
%
Deferred loan costs (fees)
 
365

 
 
 
331

 
 
Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan costs (fees)
 
1,309,124

 
 
 
1,189,999

 
 
Allowance for loan losses
 
(13,097
)
 
 
 
(12,224
)
 
 
Net loans held-for-investment
 
$
1,296,027

 
 
 
$
1,177,775

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan costs (fees) were $1.31 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $119.1 million, or 10.0%, from $1.19 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to new funding of $352.3 million and advances of $96.9 million, partially offset by paydowns and payoffs of $322.6 million, transfers to loans held-for-sale of $7.0 million and charge-offs of $480 thousand.

49



Allowance for loan losses
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses includes a general allowance for performing loans, which are grouped based on similar characteristics, and a specific allowance for individual impaired loans or loans considered by management to be in a high-risk category. General allowances are established based on a number of factors, including historical loss rates, an assessment of portfolio trends and conditions, accrual status and economic conditions.
For any loan held for investment, a specific allowance may be assigned based on an impairment analysis. Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The amount of impairment is based on an analysis of the most probable source of repayment, including the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows, the estimated market value or the fair value of the underlying collateral. Interest income on impaired loans is accrued as earned, unless the loan is placed on nonaccrual status.
Individual loans considered to be uncollectible are charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Factors used in determining the amount and timing of charge-offs on loans include consideration of the loan type, length of delinquency, sufficiency of collateral value, lien priority and the overall financial condition of the borrower. Collateral value is determined using updated appraisals and/or other market comparable information. Charge-offs are generally taken on loans once the impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary. Recoveries on loans previously charged off are added to the allowance for loan losses. Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans were (0.02)% and (0.01)%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 and 0.01% and (0.03)%, respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Allowance for loan losses totaled $13.1 million and $12.2 million, respectively, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in loan balance during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
We analyze the loan portfolio, including delinquencies, concentrations, and risk characteristics, at least quarterly in order to assess the overall level of the allowance. We also rely on internal and external loan review procedures to further assess individual loans and loan pools, and economic data for overall industry and geographic trends.
In determining the allowance and the related provision for loan losses, we consider three principal elements: (i) valuation allowances based upon probable incurred losses identified during the review of impaired commercial and industrial, commercial property and construction loans, (ii) allocations, by loan classes, on loan portfolios based on historical loan loss experience and (iii) qualitative factors. Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations to record changes to the total allowance to a level deemed appropriate by us.


50



The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses and net charge-offs as of the dates or for the periods indicated:
 
 
As of or For the Three Months Ended
($ in thousands)
 
Real Estate
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Consumer
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
$
9,323

 
$
3,108

 
$
190

 
$
12,621

Charge-offs
 

 
(18
)
 
(26
)
 
(44
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
16

 
46

 
41

 
103

Provision for loan losses
 
269

 
108

 
40

 
417

Ending balance
 
$
9,608

 
$
3,244

 
$
245

 
$
13,097

Average loan balances
 
$
1,050,506

 
$
187,978

 
$
28,325

 
$
1,266,809

Ending loan balances
 
$
1,074,301

 
$
206,986

 
$
27,472

 
$
1,308,759

Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annualized net recoveries to average loans
 
(0.01
)%
 
(0.06
)%
 
(0.21
)%
 
(0.02
)%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
 
0.89
 %
 
1.57
 %
 
0.89
 %
 
1.00
 %
September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
$
7,818

 
$
3,058

 
$
153

 
$
11,029

Charge-offs
 
(8
)
 
(72
)
 
(14
)
 
(94
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 

 
121

 
9

 
130

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
697

 
(121
)
 
10

 
586

Ending balance
 
$
8,507

 
$
2,986

 
$
158

 
$
11,651

Average loan balances
 
$
917,094

 
$
157,724

 
$
32,241

 
$
1,107,059

Ending loan balances
 
$
948,479

 
$
165,847

 
$
32,053

 
$
1,146,379

Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
 
 %
 
(0.12
)%
 
0.06
 %
 
(0.01
)%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
 
0.90
 %
 
1.80
 %
 
0.49
 %
 
1.02
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

51



The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses and net charge-offs as of the dates or for the periods indicated:
 
 
As of or For the Nine Months Ended
($ in thousands)
 
Real Estate
 
Commercial and Industrial
 
Consumer
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
$
8,507

 
$
3,548

 
$
169

 
$
12,224

Charge-offs
 
(204
)
 
(108
)
 
(167
)
 
(479
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
68

 
280

 
67

 
415

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
1,237

 
(476
)
 
176

 
937

Ending balance
 
$
9,608

 
$
3,244

 
$
245

 
$
13,097

Average loan balances
 
$
1,026,764

 
$
177,779

 
$
31,355

 
$
1,235,898

Ending loan balances
 
$
1,074,301

 
$
206,986

 
$
27,472

 
$
1,308,759

Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
 
0.02
%
 
(0.13
)%
 
0.43
%
 
0.01
 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
 
0.89
%
 
1.57
 %
 
0.89
%
 
1.00
 %
September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beginning balance
 
$
7,497

 
$
3,657

 
$
166

 
$
11,320

Charge-offs
 
(8
)
 
(292
)
 
(56
)
 
(356
)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
 
1

 
539

 
33

 
573

Provision (reversal) for loan losses
 
1,017

 
(918
)
 
15

 
114

Ending balance
 
$
8,507

 
$
2,986

 
$
158

 
$
11,651

Average loan balances
 
$
884,048

 
$
152,162

 
$
33,038

 
$
1,069,248

Ending loan balances
 
$
948,479

 
$
165,847

 
$
32,053

 
$
1,146,379

Ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
 
%
 
(0.22
)%
 
0.09
%
 
(0.03
)%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
 
0.90
%
 
1.80
 %
 
0.49
%
 
1.02
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The decrease in allowance for loan losses to commercial and industrial loans was primarily due to the decreases in historical loss rate and specific reserve of commercial and industrial loans.

52



Nonperforming Loans and Nonperforming Assets
The following table presents a summary of total non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Amount Change
 
Percentage Change
Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$
234

 
$
318

 
$
(84
)
 
(26.4
)%
Residential property
 

 
730

 
(730
)
 
(100.0
)%
SBA property
 
970

 
1,810

 
(840
)
 
(46.4
)%
Total real estate loans
 
1,204

 
2,858

 
(1,654
)
 
(57.9
)%
Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Commercial term
 

 
4

 
(4
)
 
(100.0
)%
Commercial lines of credit
 

 
10

 
(10
)
 
(100.0
)%
SBA commercial term
 
254

 
338

 
(84
)
 
(24.9
)%
Total commercial and industrial loans
 
254

 
352

 
(98
)
 
(27.8
)%
Consumer loans
 
114

 
24

 
90

 
375.0
 %
Total nonaccrual loans
 
1,572

 
3,234

 
(1,662
)
 
(51.4
)%
Loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual
 

 

 

 
 %
Total nonperforming loans
 
1,572

 
3,234

 
(1,662
)
 
(51.4
)%
Other real estate owned
 

 
99

 
(99
)
 
(100.0
)%
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
1,572

 
$
3,333

 
$
(1,761
)
 
(52.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Nonperforming loans to loans held-for-investment
 
0.12
%
 
0.27
%
 
 
 
 
Nonperforming assets to total assets
 
0.09
%
 
0.23
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total nonaccrual loans were $1.6 million at September 30, 2018, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 51.4%, from $3.2 million at December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to payoffs of $1.9 million, partially offset by loans became nonaccrual status during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 of $570 thousand.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due, unless management believes the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Past due loans may or may not be adequately collateralized, but collection efforts are continuously pursued. Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower experiences changes to their financial condition, causing an inability to meet the original repayment terms, and where we believe the borrower will eventually overcome those circumstances and repay the loan in full.
Additional income of approximately $29 thousand and $80 thousand, respectively, would have been recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, had these loans been paid in accordance with their original terms throughout the periods indicated.


53



Troubled Debt Restructurings
Loans that the Bank modifies or restructures where the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties and makes a concession to the borrower in the form of changes in the amortization terms, reductions in the interest rates, the acceptance of interest only payments and, in limited cases, reductions in the outstanding loan balances are classified as TDRs. TDRs are loans modified for the purpose of alleviating temporary impairments to the borrower’s financial condition. A workout plan between a borrower and the Bank is designed to provide a bridge for the cash flow shortfalls in the near term. If the borrower works through the near term issues, in most cases, the original contractual terms of the loan will be reinstated.
The following table presents the composition of loans that were modified as TDRs by portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
 
Accruing
 
Nonaccrual
 
Total
 
Accruing
 
Nonaccrual
 
Total
Real estate loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial property
 
$

 
$
234

 
$
234

 
$

 
$
318

 
$
318

SBA property
 
319

 

 
319

 
334

 
1,039

 
1,373

Commercial and industrial loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial term
 
80

 

 
80

 
195

 
4

 
199

Commercial lines of credit
 

 

 

 

 
10

 
10

SBA commercial term
 
68

 
224

 
292

 
63

 
304

 
367

Total
 
$
467

 
$
458

 
$
925

 
$
592

 
$
1,675

 
$
2,267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total TDRs were $925 thousand at September 30, 2018, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 59.2%, from $2.3 million at December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to payoffs of $1.2 million and paydowns of $181 thousand.

54



Deposits
We gather deposits primarily through our branch locations. We offer a variety of deposit products including demand deposits accounts, NOW and money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit (or time deposits). We put continued effort into gathering noninterest demand deposits accounts through marketing to our existing and new customers, customer referrals, our marketing staff and various involvement with community networks.
Total deposits were $1.42 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of $168.2 million, or 13.4%, from $1.25 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increases in time deposits of $171.0 million and noninterest-bearing demand accounts of $31.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in savings, NOW and money market accounts of $34.1 million. As of September 30, 2018, total deposits were comprised of 24.7% noninterest-bearing demand accounts, 20.0% savings, NOW and money market accounts and 55.3% of time deposits.
Time deposits from California State Treasurer totaled $100.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively, and brokered time deposits totaled $47.5 million and $52.5 million, respectively, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our directors and shareholders with deposits over $250,000 totaled $8.9 million and $8.2 million, respectively, or 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively, of all of our deposit relationships over $250,000.
The following table presents the maturity of time deposits as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
Three Months or Less
 
Three to Six Months
 
Six Months to One Year
 
One to Three Years
 
Over Three Years
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time deposits less than $100,000
 
$
24,285

 
$
39,405

 
$
68,116

 
$
35,792

 
$
2,391

 
$
169,989

Time deposits of $100,000 or more and less than $250,000
 
38,575

 
89,544

 
110,000

 
21,262

 

 
259,381

Time deposits of $250,000 or more
 
133,228

 
84,257

 
117,710

 
20,856

 

 
356,051

Total
 
$
196,088

 
$
213,206

 
$
295,826

 
$
77,910

 
$
2,391

 
$
785,421

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time deposits less than $100,000
 
$
24,230

 
$
18,357

 
$
53,903

 
$
56,294

 
$
2,831

 
$
155,615

Time deposits of $100,000 or more and less than $250,000
 
49,002

 
36,986

 
90,321

 
15,850

 

 
192,159

Time deposits of $250,000 or more
 
139,205

 
41,558

 
68,582

 
17,267

 

 
266,612

Total
 
$
212,437

 
$
96,901

 
$
212,806

 
$
89,411

 
$
2,831

 
$
614,386

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Borrowings
Borrowings from FHLB
Other than deposits, we also utilized borrowings from FHLB as a supplementary funding source to finance our operations. Borrowings from FHLB are collateralized by residential and commercial property loans. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, total borrowings were $30.0 million and $40.0 million, respectively.
Shareholders' Equity and Regulatory Capital
Capital Resources
Shareholders’ equity is influenced primarily by earnings, dividends paid on common stock and preferred stock, sales and redemptions of common stock and preferred stock, and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income caused primarily by fluctuations in unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, on securities available-for-sale.
Shareholders’ equity was $202.9 million at September 30, 2018, an increase of $60.8 million, or 42.7%, from $142.2 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the net proceeds from the initial public offering of $45.5 million and the retention of earnings of $17.6 million, partially offset by other comprehensive loss from fair value change in securities available-for-sale of $1.8 million and dividends declared on our common stock of $1.3 million.

55



Regulatory Capital Requirements
We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking regulators. Failure to meet regulatory capital requirements may result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for "prompt corrective action" (described below), we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting policies.
In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, the role of capital has become fundamentally more important, as banking regulators have concluded that the amount and quality of capital held by banking organizations was insufficient to absorb losses during periods of severely distressed economic conditions. The Dodd-Frank Act and new banking regulations promulgated by the U.S. federal banking regulators to implement Basel III have established strengthened capital standards for banks and bank holding companies and require more capital to be held in the form of common stock. These provisions, which generally became applicable to the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015, impose meaningfully more stringent regulatory capital requirements than those applicable to the Company and the Bank prior to that date. In addition, the Basel III regulations will implement a concept known as the "capital conservation buffer." In general, banks and bank holding companies will be required to hold a buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets over each minimum capital ratio to avoid being subject to limits on capital distributions (e.g., dividends, stock buybacks, etc.) and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. For community banks, the capital conservation buffer requirement commenced on January 1, 2016, with a gradual phase-in. Full compliance with the capital conservation buffer will be required by January 1, 2019. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we would have met the fully phased-in Basel III capital requirements.
The tables below summarizes the minimum capital requirements applicable to us and the Bank pursuant to Basel III regulations as of the dates reflected, and exclusive of the capital conservation buffer as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The minimum capital requirements are only regulatory minimums and banking regulators can impose higher requirements on individual institutions. For example, banks and bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions generally will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels. Higher capital levels may also be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profiles of individual banking organizations. The tables below also summarizes the capital requirements applicable to us and the Bank in order to be considered "well-capitalized" from a regulatory perspective, as well as our and the Bank’s capital ratios as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. We and the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements under Basel III and were considered to be "well-capitalized" as of the dates reflected in the table below.
 
 
Pacific City Financial Corporation
 
Pacific City Bank
 
Minimum Regulatory Requirements
 
Well Capitalized Requirements (Bank)
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
16.1
%
 
15.9
%
 
4.5
%
 
6.5
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
17.1
%
 
16.9
%
 
8.0
%
 
10.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
16.1
%
 
15.9
%
 
6.0
%
 
8.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
12.6
%
 
12.4
%
 
4.0
%
 
5.0
%
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
12.2
%
 
12.1
%
 
4.5
%
 
6.5
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
13.2
%
 
13.1
%
 
8.0
%
 
10.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
12.2
%
 
12.1
%
 
6.0
%
 
8.0
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
 
10.0
%
 
9.9
%
 
4.0
%
 
5.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Basel III regulations also revise the definition of capital and describe the capital components and eligibility criteria for common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. The most significant changes to the capital criteria are that: (i) the prior concept of unrestricted Tier 1 capital and restricted Tier 1 capital has been replaced with additional Tier 1 capital and a regulatory capital ratio that is based on common equity Tier 1 capital; and (ii) trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued after May 19, 2010 no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital. This change is already effective due to the Dodd-Frank Act, although such instruments issued prior to May 19, 2010 continue to qualify as Tier 1 capital (assuming they qualified as such under the prior regulatory capital standards), subject to the 25% of Tier 1 capital limit.

56



Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the measure of our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, while at the same time meeting our operating, capital and strategic cash flow needs, all at a reasonable cost. We continuously monitor our liquidity position to ensure that assets and liabilities are managed in a manner that will meet all short-term and long-term cash requirements. We manage our liquidity position to meet the daily cash flow needs of customers, while maintaining an appropriate balance between assets and liabilities to meet the return on investment objectives of our shareholders.
Our liquidity position is supported by management of liquid assets and liabilities and access to alternative sources of funds. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions, federal funds sold, and unpledged securities available-for-sale. Liquid liabilities may include core deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other borrowings. Other sources of liquidity include the sale of loans, the ability to acquire additional national market noncore deposits, additional collateralized borrowings such as borrowings from FHLB, the issuance of debt securities, additional borrowings through Federal Reserve Discount Window, and the issuance of preferred or common securities. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are primarily to fund on-going operations, including payment of interest on deposits and debt, extensions of credit to borrowers, capital expenditures and shareholder dividends. These liquidity requirements are met primarily through cash flow from operations, redeployment of prepaying and maturing balances in our loan and investment securities portfolio, increases in debt financing and other borrowings, and increases in customer deposits. For additional information regarding our operating, investing and financing cash flows, see the consolidated statements of cash flows provided in our consolidated financial statements.
Integral to our liquidity management is the administration of borrowings. To the extent we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we seek to meet our liquidity needs through wholesale funding or other borrowings on either a short- or long-term basis.
As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had $60.0 million of available unused unsecured federal funds lines. In addition, available unused secured borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve Discount Window at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $49.9 million and $48.1 million, respectively. Federal Reserve Discount Window were collateralized by loans totaling $56.4 million and $56.2 million as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Our borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve Discount Window is limited by eligible collateral.
At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had $30.0 million and $40.0 million of outstanding borrowings from FHLB, respectively. Based on the values of loans pledged as collateral, we had $374.8 million and $311.0 million of additional borrowing capacity with FHLB as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. We also maintain relationships in the capital markets with brokers and dealers to issue certificates of deposit.
Pacific City Financial Corporation, on a stand-alone holding company basis, must provide for its own liquidity and its main source of funding is dividends from the Bank. There are statutory, regulatory and debt covenant limitations that affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the holding company. Management believes that these limitations will not impact our ability to meet our ongoing short-term cash obligations.

57



Off-Balance Sheet Activities and Contractual Obligations
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have limited off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into financial commitments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial commitments include commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit, commercial and similar letters of credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk not recognized in the Company’s financial statements.
The Company’s exposure to loan loss in the event of nonperformance on these financial commitments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for loans reflected in the financial statements.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each client’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.
($ in thousands)
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Commitments to extend credit
 
$
118,764

 
$
109,835

Standby letters of credit
 
4,613

 
3,309

Commercial letters of credit
 
777

 
233

Total
 
$
124,154

 
$
113,377

 
 
 
 
 
Contractual Obligations
The following table contains supplemental information regarding our total contractual obligations as of the dates indicated:
($ in thousands)
 
Within One Year
 
One to Three Years
 
Three to Five Years
 
Over Five Years
 
Total
September 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time deposits
 
$
705,120

 
$
77,910

 
$
2,391

 
$

 
$
785,421

Borrowings from FHLB
 
10,000

 
10,000

 
10,000

 

 
30,000

Operating leases
 
2,296

 
4,288

 
3,577

 
1,239

 
11,400

Total
 
$
717,416

 
$
92,198

 
$
15,968

 
$
1,239

 
$
826,821

December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time deposits
 
$
564,644

 
$
46,911

 
$
2,831

 
$

 
$
614,386

Borrowings from FHLB
 
10,000

 
20,000

 
10,000

 

 
40,000

Operating leases
 
2,289

 
4,395

 
3,498

 
2,533

 
12,715

Total
 
$
576,933

 
$
71,306

 
$
16,329

 
$
2,533

 
$
667,101

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We believe that we will be able to meet our contractual obligations as they come due through the maintenance of adequate cash levels. We expect to maintain adequate cash levels through profitability, loan and securities repayment and maturity activity and continued deposit gathering activities. We have in place various borrowing mechanisms for both short-term and long-term liquidity needs.


58



Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market interest rates, equity prices, and credit spreads.
Interest Rate Risk
Overview: Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (repricing risk), changes in the expected maturities of assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers’ ability to prepay residential mortgage loans at any time and depositors’ ability to redeem certificates of deposit before maturity (option risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve where interest rates increase or decrease in a nonparallel fashion (yield curve risk), and changes in spread relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and London Interbank Offered Rate (basis risk).
Our asset liability committee ("ALCO") establishes broad policy limits with respect to interest rate risk. ALCO establishes specific operating guidelines within the parameters of the board of directors’ policies. In general, we seek to minimize the impact of changing interest rates on net interest income and the economic values of assets and liabilities. Our ALCO meets quarterly to monitor the level of interest rate risk sensitivity to ensure compliance with the board of directors’ approved risk limits.
Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective management of interest rate risk begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk posture given business forecasts, management objectives, market expectations, and policy constraints.
An asset sensitive position refers to a balance sheet position in which an increase in short-term interest rates is expected to generate higher net interest income, as rates earned on our interest-earning assets would reprice upward more quickly than rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, thus expanding our net interest margin. Conversely, a liability sensitive position refers to a balance sheet position in which an increase in short-term interest rates is expected to generate lower net interest income, as rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice upward more quickly than rates earned on our interest-earning assets, thus compressing our net interest margin.
Measurement: Interest rate risk measurement is calculated and reported to the board and ALCO at least quarterly. The information reported includes period-end results and identifies any policy limits exceeded, along with an assessment of the policy limit breach and the action plan and timeline for resolution, mitigation, or assumption of the risk.
We use two approaches to model interest rate risk: Net Interest Income at Risk ("NII at Risk"), and Economic Value of Equity ("EVE"). Under NII at Risk, net interest income is modeled utilizing various assumptions for assets, liabilities, and derivatives. EVE measures the period end market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities and the change in this value as rates change. EVE is a period end measurement.
The following table presents the projected changes in NII at Risk and EVE that would occur upon an immediate change in interest rates based on independent analysis, but without giving effect to any steps that management might take to counteract that change as of the dates indicated:
 
 
September 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Simulated Rate Changes
 
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
 
Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity
 
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
 
Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity
+200
 
20.2
 %
 
4.1
 %
 
18.4
 %
 
3.9
 %
+100
 
10.4
 %
 
2.8
 %
 
9.4
 %
 
2.6
 %
-100
 
(13.1
)%
 
(4.6
)%
 
(11.5
)%
 
(4.0
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


59



Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as of September 30, 2018 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and other members of the Company’s senior management. The Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2018, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is: (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


60



Part II - Other Information
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal claims. The Company has reviewed all legal claims against us with counsel and have taken into consideration the views of such counsel as to the potential outcome of the claims in determining our accrued loss contingency. The Company did not have any accrued loss contingencies for legal claims at September 30, 2018. It is reasonably possible the Company may incur losses in addition to the amounts currently accrued. However, at this time, the Company is unable to estimate the range of additional losses that are reasonably possible because of a number of factors, including the fact that certain of these litigation matters are still in their early stages and involve claims for which, at this point, the Company believes have little to no merit. Management has considered these and other possible loss contingencies and does not expect the amounts to be material to the consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A - Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed "Risk Factors" section of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2018 (333-226208) and declared effective by the SEC on August 9, 2018, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Management is not aware of any material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in our registration statement on Form S-1. The risks described on Form S-1 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing the Company. The risk factors identified are in addition to those contained in any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be or otherwise addressed in connection with a forward-looking statement or contained in any of the Company's subsequent filings with the SEC. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to management or that management presently believes not to be material may also result in material and adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5 - Other Information
None.

61



Item 6 - Exhibits
Exhibit Number
 
Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
3.1
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
3.1
 
July 17, 2018
3.2
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
3.2
 
July 17, 2018
3.3
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
3.3
 
July 17, 2018
4.1
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
4.1
 
July 17, 2018
10.1
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.1
 
July 17, 2018
10.2
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.2
 
July 17, 2018
10.3
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.3
 
July 17, 2018
10.4
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.4
 
July 17, 2018
10.5
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.5
 
July 17, 2018
10.6
 
 
S-1
 
333-226208
 
10.6
 
July 17, 2018
31.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Filed herewith

62



Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
Pacific City Financial Corporation
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 8, 2018
 
/s/ Henry Kim
 
 
 
Henry Kim
 
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 8, 2018
 
/s/ Timothy Chang
 
 
 
Timothy Chang
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


63