UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant x                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.

THE HOLDING COMPANY

FOR

1770 Timberwood Boulevard

Suite 100

Charlottesville, Virginia 22911

NOTICE OF 2007 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 2007

Stockholders of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.:

The 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at Westwood Country Club, 800 Maple Avenue East, Vienna, Virginia 22180, on Thursday, April 19, 2007, beginning at 2:00 p.m. (local time), for the following purposes:

The close of business on March 9, 2007 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection by any stockholder at the Company’s principal office at 1770 Timberwood Boulevard, Suite 100, Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 during usual business hours for a period of at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Georgia S. Derrico

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2007

Charlottesville, Virginia

Your Vote is Important.

You are cordially invited and urged to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly mail it in the enclosed envelope. The proxy is revocable in the manner described in the proxy statement at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously returned your proxy card.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please note that we may ask to see a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license, to identify you as a stockholder. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (“street name” holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date.

SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2007 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 2007

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at Westwood Country Club, 800 Maple Avenue East, Vienna, Virginia 22180, on Thursday, April 19, 2007, beginning at 2:00 p.m. (local time), and any adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting”) for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Meeting and the enclosed proxy will first be sent to stockholders on or about March 22, 2007. For information on how to vote your shares, see the instructions included on the enclosed proxy card and under “Solicitation, Revocability and Voting of Proxies” below.

SOLICITATION, REVOCABILITY AND VOTING OF PROXIES

Voting of Proxies

Shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value (“Common Stock”), represented at the Annual Meeting by an executed and unrevoked proxy in the form enclosed will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxy. If no instructions are specified on an executed and returned form of proxy, the proxies intend to vote the shares represented thereby in favor of each of the proposals to be presented to and voted upon by the stockholders as set forth herein.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by an executed and unrevoked proxy will be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated in the proxy. The proxy also confers on the proxies the discretionary authority to vote with respect to any matter presented at the Annual Meeting for which advance notice was not received by the Company in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

Revocability of Proxies

Any proxy given by a stockholder of record may be revoked by such stockholder at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

All written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to revocation or proxies should be sent to: Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc., 550 Broadview Avenue, Warrenton, Virginia 20186, (540) 347-4521, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Any stockholder who holds shares in street name with a bank or broker must contact that bank or broker if he or she wishes to revoke his or her proxy.

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy solicitation is made by the board of directors of the Company and the cost of this solicitation is being borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited through the mail and, if deemed advisable, directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or other means of

communication, without being paid additional compensation for such services. The Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expense in forwarding the proxy materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock.

Annual Report

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including consolidated financial statements and related notes, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, accompanies but does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.

VOTING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS

Only holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on March 9, 2007 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. On that date there were 6,180,449 shares of Common Stock outstanding, which is the only outstanding class of voting securities of the Company. The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, in order to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions and shares held of record by a broker or nominee that are voted on any matter will be included in determining whether a quorum exists. Each holder of Common Stock shall have one vote for each share of Common Stock registered, on the Record Date, in such holder’s name on the books of the Company.

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy. Accordingly, the two Class I nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast by the holders of Common Stock will be elected. There will be no cumulative voting in the election of directors. A broker non-vote or a withholding of authority to vote with respect to one or more nominees for director will not have the effect of a vote against such nominee or nominees. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares and has not received voting instructions from its customer.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm. Any abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the matter. However, broker non-votes will be deemed shares not present to vote on such matter and will not count as votes for or against the proposal and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of such matter.

Item 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Election Procedures; Term of Office

The Board of Directors currently consists of seven directors. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, members of the Board of Directors are divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III. The members of each class are elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders following their election. The term of office of the current Class I directors expires at the Annual Meeting. The terms of the Class II and Class III directors expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2008 and 2009, respectively.

The Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved the nomination of R. Roderick Porter and Robin R. Shield to fill the two expiring Class I director positions. Mr. Porter and Ms. Shield are each currently serving as Class I directors. The two Class I nominees, if elected at the Annual Meeting, will serve until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2010.

2

The two Class I nominees receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting will be elected. Unless the authority to vote for the election of directors is withheld as to one or both of the nominees, all shares of Common Stock represented by proxy will be voted FOR the election of the nominees. If the authority to vote for the election of directors is withheld as to one but not both of the nominees, all shares of Common Stock represented by any such proxy will be voted FOR the election of the nominee as to whom such authority is not withheld.

If a nominee becomes unavailable to serve as a director for any reason before the election, the shares represented by proxy will be voted for such other person, if any, as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unavailable to serve as a director. All of the nominees have consented to being named herein and to serve if elected.

Any director vacancy occurring after the election may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors, even if such directors constitute less than a quorum of the Board of Directors. The term of a director elected to fill a vacancy by the Board shall expire at the next annual meeting held for the election of directors, regardless of whether the class of director in which he serves is to be elected at such annual meeting.

Nominees for Election

The following table sets forth the name, age and positions with the Company and Sonabank, N.A. (the “Bank”) for each nominee for election as a director of the Company:

R. Roderick Porter is the Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and the Bank. Prior to co-founding the Company in July 2004, he was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. from April 1998 until April 2004. Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. was the Nasdaq National Market System-listed bank holding company for the $1.5 billion (assets) Southern Financial Bank, Warrenton, Virginia, which was acquired by Provident Bankshares, Inc. in April 2004. From 1994 to 1998, he was President of FX Concepts, Ltd., an international money management firm located in New York City. Prior to that, he served as Chairman of New Market Capital Corp., a mortgage banking company, and a Principal of Morgan Stanley. Mr. Porter spent 15 years at Chemical Bank, including as a Senior Vice President in Chemical Bank’s treasury department where he was responsible for asset/liability management, the U.S. government and municipal securities portfolio, all U.S. dollar-denominated funding for the bank and the holding company, money market trading and the discount brokerage operation. Prior experience at Chemical Bank included tours as Vice President and General Manager for northern Europe, based in London, and for Chemical Japan, based in Tokyo. Mr. Porter is the husband of Ms. Georgia S. Derrico.

Robin R. Shield is a Director of the Company and the Bank. She is currently a private investor. In addition, for the past eight years, Ms. Shield has been the Managing and General Partner of Clear View LLP, a real estate development and investment partnership and Chairman of Norwich Partners, LLC, a hotel development company, both in Norwich, Vermont. She is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Vermont Institute of National Science and of the Robins Foundation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

3

CONTINUING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s Class II and Class III directors whose terms of office do not expire at the Annual Meeting, and the executive officers of the Company who are not also directors:

Neil J. Call is a Director of the Company and the Bank. Mr. Call, now retired, was an Executive Vice President of MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a New York City financial consulting company, since 1990. Mr. Call was formerly executive Vice President and co-founder of the Proxy/M&A Group at Dewe Rogerson, Inc., the predecessor firm to MacKenzie Partners. Mr. Call was a director of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. and Southern Financial Bank from 1986 until April 2004 and was chairman of that board’s Audit Committee. From 1986 to 1989, he served as Executive Vice President of D.F. King and Co. Prior to that he was with Gulf + Western Industries (now Paramount Communications), most recently as Executive Vice President/Finance, and previously as Director of Corporate Communications and Investor Relations. He also spent six years with Ford Motor Company’s Finance Division. Mr. Call is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Michigan.

Georgia S. Derrico is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Prior to co-founding the Company in July 2004, she was the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. from 1986 until April 2004. Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. was the Nasdaq National Market System-listed bank holding company for the $1.5 billion (assets) Southern Financial Bank, Warrenton, Virginia, which was acquired by Provident Bankshares, Inc. in April 2004. She founded Southern Financial Bank in 1986. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative and Credit Officer of the Multinational Division of Chemical Bank in New York City. She also served at Chemical Bank as the Vice President and District Head of the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States for the Corporate Banking Division. From 1993 to 2004, Ms. Derrico was a director of Oneida, Ltd. She is the wife of Mr. R. Roderick Porter.

John J. Forch is a Director of the Company and the Bank. For the past four years, he has been the Managing Partner of Forch & Associates, LLC, a tax and financial services firm providing strategic and transactional financial and tax advice in Northern Virginia. Prior thereto, Mr. Forch retired as a Managing Partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC, where he spent 14 years in various senior management and client service partner positions. Mr. Forch is a Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Florida.

Michael A. Gaffney is a Director of the Company and the Bank. Mr. Gaffney has been President of Gaffney Homes, LLC, a home builder located in the Charlottesville, Virginia area for 20 years. Mr. Gaffney also

4

develops and builds multi-family and commercial office space, and has earned a number of regional and national home building awards. Mr. Gaffney currently serves as the Chairman of the Board for the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority and the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority and on the Advisory Board of the I Have A Dream Foundation of Charlottesville. He is a Past-Chairman for the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce, which represents over 1,400 businesses in Charlottesville and the surrounding five counties.

Charles A. Kabbash is a Director of the Company and the Bank. Mr. Kabbash has been the owner of 414 Associates, a real estate investment company, operating primarily in the Charlottesville, Virginia area since 1984. He also manages Summit Realty, a commercial realty firm, and Summit Business Brokerage, which negotiates the purchase or sale of businesses. Both of these firms also operate primarily in the Charlottesville area. Mr. Kabbash is heavily involved in the business and civic community in Charlottesville, serving as a board member and board vice-chairman of the North Downtown Property Association.

Executive Officers of the Company

William H. Lagos is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank. From September 1986 until April 2004, Mr. Lagos was the Senior Vice President and Controller of Southern Financial Bank, the operating subsidiary of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc., which was acquired by Provident Bankshares, Inc. in April 2004. Mr. Lagos participated in the Company’s organization commencing in November 2004.

William H. Stevens is the Executive Vice President-Lending of the Company and the Bank. From 1999 until April 2004, Mr. Stevens was the Executive Vice President of Credit Administration for Southern Financial Bank, the operating subsidiary of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc., which was acquired by Provident Bankshares, Inc. in April 2004. He resigned as a Senior Vice President of Credit Administration from Provident Bankshares, Inc. in April 2005 when he joined the Company. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Stevens served as a Senior Analyst in the Office of the Inspector General of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Prior to that he was an Executive Vice President at Riggs Bank, N.A. in Washington, D.C. where he managed the bank’s commercial real estate and single family lending activities. He served for three years as President and COO of Anchor Mortgage Services. His background also includes 18 years at Chemical Bank, where he was a Senior Vice President, Real Estate.

Each executive officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors of the Company and holds office until his successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company held 11 meetings during 2006. There was no director who attended less than 75% of the aggregate of the (1) total number of meetings of the Board and (2) total number of meetings held by committees on which he or she served. Each director is expected to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to company matters to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, including by attending annual and special meetings of the stockholders of the Company, the Board and Committees of which he or she is a member.

Chairman of the Board

Georgia S. Derrico has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2005 and of the Bank since it commenced operations in April 2005.

The Chairman of the Board organizes the work of the Board and ensures that the Board has access to sufficient information to enable the Board to carry out its functions, including monitoring the Company’s and the Bank’s performance and the performance of management. In carrying out this role, the Chairman, among other things: (1) presides over all meetings of the Board of Directors and stockholders; (2) establishes the annual agenda of the Board and agendas of each meeting in consultation with the President of the Company, R. Roderick Porter; (3) oversees the distribution of information to Directors; (4) advises with respect to the work of each Committee and reviews (with the Nominating Committee) changes in Board membership and the membership and chair of each Committee; (5) coordinates periodic review of management’s strategic plan for the Company and the Bank; and, (6) coordinates the annual performance review of the key senior managers.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Company’s Board of Directors has four committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating Committee and the Asset-Liability Management Committee, each of which is described below.

Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are: Neil J. Call (Chairman), John J. Forch and Michael A. Gaffney, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under The Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards and in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Board has determined that all of the Audit Committee members have the financial knowledge, business experience and independent judgment necessary for service on the Audit Committee. The Board has further determined that Neil J. Call, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and has the financial literacy and accounting or financial qualifications and experience to provide effective oversight of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.sonabank.com.

As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, the functions of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in its oversight of:

6

In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee, among other things:

The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly and met 4 times during fiscal 2006. The Audit Committee’s meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and with the Bank’s internal auditors, in each case without the presence of the Company’s or the Bank’s management.

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with both management and the independent registered public accountants all annual and quarterly financial statements prior to their issuance. During fiscal 2006, management advised the Audit Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee.

Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board regarding the membership of the Board, including:

The Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.sonabank.com. The members of the Nominating Committee are: Charles A. Kabbash (Chairman), Neil J. Call and John J. Forch, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under The Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards. The Nominating Committee met one time in 2006.

Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee are: John J. Forch (Chairman), Neil J. Call and Charles A. Kabbash, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under The Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Bank’s senior management (management is not compensated for their service to the Company), evaluating the performance of senior management and, either as a committee or together with the other independent members of the Board, determining and approving the compensation level for the Chief Executive Officer, and making recommendations regarding compensation of other executive officers and certain compensation plans to the Board. The Compensation Committee does not presently operate pursuant to a written charter. However, the Bank’s Board has adopted a staffing and compensation policy with respect to Bank employees. The Compensation Committee met 2 times in 2006.

7

Asset-Liability Management Committee: The members of the Asset-Liability Management Committee are: R. Roderick Porter (Chairman), Charles A. Kabbash and Robin R. Shield. The Asset-Liability Management Committee ensures that the Bank’s investment policies and procedures are adequate and that the Bank’s investments in securities are consistent with the guidelines established in the Bank’s policies and comply with applicable laws and regulations. The Committee evaluates the performance of the securities portfolio to ensure that the Bank’s objectives with respect to diversification, liquidity, and quality are met. While management is responsible for purchase decisions with respect to investment securities, the Asset-Liability Management Committee is responsible for reviewing and ratifying management’s investment transactions. The Asset-Liability Management Committee is also responsible for reviewing the entire balance sheet to ensure that products and funding sources meet with the Board’s policies relating to asset-liability and interest rate risk management. The Asset-Liability Management Committee generally meets quarterly and met 4 times in 2006.

Director Nominations Process

The Nominating Committee considers nominees to serve as directors of the Company and recommends such persons to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee also considers director candidates recommended by stockholders if such candidates appear to be qualified to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors and meet the criteria for nominees considered by the committee. The Nominating Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of the Board. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Nominating Committee’s resources, the Nominating Committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below in the paragraph titled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.”

Criteria for Director Nominees.

The Nominating Committee has adopted a set of criteria that it considers when it selects individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee considers the following criteria in selecting nominees: financial, regulatory and business experience; familiarity with and participation in the local community; integrity, honesty and reputation; dedication to the Company and its stockholders; independence; and any other factors the Nominating Committee deems relevant, including age, size of the Board of Directors and regulatory disclosure obligations.

The Nominating Committee may weigh the foregoing criteria differently in different situations, depending on the composition of the Board at the time. The Nominating Committee will strive to maintain at least one director who meets the definition of “audit committee financial expert” under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee considers and reviews an existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance; length of board service; experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the Board; and independence.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees.

Pursuant to the Nominating Committee Charter as approved by the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee is responsible for the process relating to director nominations, including identifying, interviewing and selecting individuals who may be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The process that the Nominating Committee follows when it identifies and evaluates individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors is set forth below.

Identification. For purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee will rely on personal contacts of the members of the Board of Directors as well as their knowledge of members of

8

the Bank’s local communities. The Nominating Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with the policy and procedures set forth below in the paragraph titled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.” The Nominating Committee has not previously used an independent search firm in identifying nominees.

Evaluation. In evaluating potential nominees, the Nominating Committee determines whether the candidate is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of Directors by evaluating the candidate under the selection criteria set forth above. In addition, for any new director nominee, the Nominating Committee will conduct a check of the individual’s background and interview the candidate.

Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.

Any stockholder of the Company may nominate one or more persons for election as a director of the Company at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the prior notice and information provisions contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. In order for a director nomination to be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Company must be received at the Company’s offices not later than the 90^th day prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting. To submit a nomination of a director candidate, a stockholder must submit the following information in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Nominating Committee, care of the Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s main office:

1. The name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated;

2. A representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at the annual meeting and, if applicable, intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice;

3. If applicable, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the stockholder;

4. Such other information regarding each nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any successor regulation thereto; and

5. Such nominee’s consent to serve as a director of the Company if so elected.

A nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures may not be eligible to be voted upon by the stockholders at the meeting.

If the Nominating Committee receives a director nomination from a stockholder or group of stockholders who (individually or in the aggregate) beneficially owned greater than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock for at least one year as of the date of such recommendation, the Company, as required by applicable securities law, will identify the candidate and stockholder or group of stockholders recommending the candidate and will disclose in its proxy statement whether the Nominating Committee chose to nominate the candidate, as well as certain other information.

Stockholder Communications with Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meeting

The Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications received from stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to them in care of Devon Porter, Corporate Secretary, 550 Broadview Avenue, Warrenton, Virginia 20186; (540) 347-4521. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of the Audit Committee. Other concerns will also generally be referred to the Audit Committee.

9

In addition, the Board of Directors encourages directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All of the Company’s directors attended the Company’s 2006 annual meeting of stockholders held on April 13, 2006.

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Board designed the Code in an effort to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest, full, fair and accurate disclosure in filings and other public communications made by the Company, compliance with applicable laws, prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics, and accountability for adherence to the Code. The Code of Ethics is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.sonabank.com.

Director Independence

During the review by the Company’s Board of Directors of director independence, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” below. The Board also considered whether there were any transactions or relationships between directors or any member of their immediate family (or any entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an executive officer, general partner or significant equity holder) and members of the Company’s senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions existed that were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the Company’s directors, with the exception of Georgia S. Derrico and R. Roderick Porter, are independent directors as defined by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Both Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter are considered to be “inside” directors because of their employment as senior executives of the Company. Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter are husband and wife, and their adult son, R. Devon Porter, is the Secretary of the Company and is also employed by the Bank as a Senior Vice President and serves as the Bank’s Secretary.

The independent directors of the Company hold executive sessions from time to time at the conclusion of regular meetings of the Board of Directors. In 2006, the independent directors held 2 executive sessions.

10

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Director fees were not paid in 2006. However, beginning in January 2007, non-employee directors will receive a fee of $500 for each Board meeting attended and $250 for each committee meeting attended, plus any travel, food and lodging expenses. Any non-employee directors who attend either Board or committee meetings by conference telephone will receive one-half of the fee for such meeting. Directors who are also employees of the Company or the Bank will receive no additional compensation for their service as a director.

Further, in October 2006, the Compensation Committee determined that Board members should receive 1,000 options for each year of service on the Board after the initial election held in 2005. In January 2007, each of Ms. Shield and Messrs. Call, Forch, Gaffney and Kabbash was granted options that will vest ratably over five years to purchase 1,000 shares of Common Stock for service as a director in 2006 with a full grant value of $16,200. However, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123R, none of the compensation expense related to the January 2007 option awards is included herein as such expense will not be recorded until 2007.

11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for developing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s executive compensation policies. John J. Forch, Neil J. Call and Charles A. Kabbash, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined to be an independent director, as defined in The Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards, serve on the Compensation Committee. This discussion and analysis describes the components of the Company’s compensation program for its named executive officers and describes the basis on which the 2006 compensation determinations were made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the executive officers of the Company and the Bank. The Compensation Committee did not hire a compensation consultant in connection with its review of executive compensation, but did consult with its financial advisor with respect to bonuses paid to the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the President for their participation in the merger with 1^st Service Bank and the Company’s initial public offering.

Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation

The Compensation Committee makes all decisions with respect to compensation of the named executive officers, subject to review and approval by the full Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer reviews the performance of the Company’s executive officers (other than herself and the President) and, based on that review, provides input regarding the performance of the other executive officers and makes recommendations for compensation amounts payable to the other executive officers of the Company, including the other named executive officers. Neither the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer nor the President is involved with any aspect of determining her or his own pay.

Compensation Committee Activity

When reviewing executive compensation, the Compensation Committee and the Board review all elements of current and historic compensation for each named executive officer.

Compensation Philosophy

No executive officer of the Company is paid a salary, bonus or other form of compensation other than options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their service to the Company. The named executive officers of the Company currently hold the same executive officer positions with the Bank and all executive compensation is paid by the Bank for services performed by executives of the Bank. Accordingly, the following discussion of executive compensation relates to the compensation by the Bank to executives of the Bank.

The fundamental objectives of the Bank’s executive compensation policies are to ensure that Bank executives are provided incentives and compensated in a way that advances both the short- and long-term interests of stockholders while also ensuring that the Company and the Bank are able to attract and retain executive management talent. Accordingly, compensation is based on: (1) the employee’s individual performance and his or her ability to lead the Company and the Bank to achieve their respective financial goals and (2) the Company’s consolidated financial performance. In making decisions with respect to any element of an executive officer’s compensation, the Committee considers the total compensation that may be awarded to the executive officer, including salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company and the Bank of all perquisites and other personal benefits. The Committee’s goal is to award compensation that is reasonable when all elements of potential compensation are considered.

12

Peer Groups and Benchmarks

The Company and the Bank are less than two years old. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has not used benchmarks as it believes that such measures would not presently serve as a useful comparison tool.

Setting Executive Compensation

In reviewing the 2006 compensation of each of the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed all components of their respective compensation, including base salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviewed each executive officer’s compensation history and performance information. In making compensation decisions with respect to each of the components of executive compensation set forth below, the Compensation Committee considers the competitive market for executives. No executive officer of the Company or the Bank has a written employment or severance agreement with the Company or the Bank.

In conjunction with the above, and in part taking into consideration the Bank’s net income as well as the successful completion of the Company’s initial public offering and the acquisition of 1^st Service Bank, the Compensation Committee awarded a bonus to each of the Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer in the amount of 50% of salary as of December 31, 2006 to be paid over a period of three years, provided that each of Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter, as the case may be, remains employed by the Company and the Bank during fiscal 2007 and 2008. The first payment was made in 2007 with respect to the 2006 fiscal year. Any remaining portion of the bonus will be forfeited if such individual is no longer employed by the Company or the Bank.

Components of Executive Compensation

The principal components of the executive compensation program of the Company (through the Bank) are:

Base Salary

Salaries provide executive officers with a base level of monthly income and help achieve the objectives outlined above by attracting and retaining strong talent. Generally, base salaries are not based on specific measures of corporate performance, but are determined by tenure of service, scope of the position, including current job responsibilities, relative salaries of the Company’s peers and the officer’s individual performance and contribution to the Company. The base salaries are adjusted based on factors such as individual experience, individual performance, individual potential, cost of living considerations and specific issues particular to the Company as well as the Compensation Committee’s subjective judgment.

The Compensation Committee monitors the base salary levels and the various incentives of the named executive officers to ensure that overall compensation is consistent with the Company’s objectives and remains competitive within the area of the Company’s operations. In setting the goals and measuring an executive’s performance against those goals, the Company considers the performance of its competitors and general economic and market conditions. None of the factors included in the Company’s strategic and business goals are assigned a specific weight. Instead, the Compensation Committee recognizes that the relative importance of these factors may change in order to adapt the Company’s operations to specific business challenges and to reflect changing economic and marketplace conditions.

Cash Incentive

The annual compensation of the named executive officers consists primarily of a base salary and a cash incentive, or bonus. The bonus is designed to help achieve the objectives of the compensation program by

13

rewarding the executive officers for the attainment of profitable growth and stable financial and operating conditions. In determining the cash incentive, in January and July of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the Company’s performance compared to its budget and the operating ratios of return on assets and return on equity and the efficiency ratio.

Long-term Equity Incentive Awards

The Company maintains an equity compensation program for its named executive officers and other key employees, in order to attract and retain key employees and enable those persons to participate in the long-term success of the Company. Stock options have been the Company’s only form of long-term incentive compensation, and may be subject to performance-based and/or time-based vesting requirements. As of February 28, 2007, there were 157,750 options outstanding under the Company’s Option Plan, 103,000 of which were held by named executive officers of the Company and are fully vested. During 2006, no stock options were granted to named executive officers of the Company.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Perquisites and other personal benefits represent a small part of the Company’s executive compensation program. The named executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefits plans, which are generally available to all Company employees. The Compensation Committee reviews the perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the executive officers annually, and offers such benefits after consideration of the business need. The only perquisite provided by the Company currently is a car allowance.

Tax and Accounting Implications

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation, including options granted pursuant to its 2004 Stock Option Plan in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 123R, which the Company adopted effective January 1, 2006.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, a limitation was placed on tax deductions of any publicly-held corporation for individual compensation to certain executives of such corporation exceeding $1,000,000 in any taxable year, unless the compensation is performance-based. The Company has no individuals with non-performance based compensation paid in excess of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) tax deduction limit.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation. If an executive is entitled to nonqualified deferred compensation benefits that are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, and such benefits do not comply with Section 409A, then the benefits are taxable in the first year they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, the recipient is subject to regular federal income tax, interest and an additional federal income tax of 20% of the benefit includible in income. While the final regulations have not yet become effective, the Company believes it is operating in good faith compliance with the statutory provisions which were effective January 1, 2005.

14

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by the Company to or on behalf of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (determined as of the end of the last fiscal year) (the “named executive officers”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006:

Summary Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table contains information concerning the unexercised options and other equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2006:

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2006 Fiscal Year-End

Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Change in Control Agreements

None of the named executive officers have employment agreements that provide for payment upon a termination for a reason other than a change in control. In August 2006, the Company and the Bank entered into change in control agreements with Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter. These agreements provide such officers certain

15

lump sum cash payments in the event the officer’s employment is terminated without cause at any time or if such employment is terminated by the executive for “good reason” and the officer signs the form of mutual general release.

For purposes of the agreements, “cause” is defined as:

Under the change in control agreements, “good reason” is defined as:

A “Change in Control” is defined generally to mean: a change in the ownership of the Company or the Bank, a change in the effective control of the Company or the Bank or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company or the Bank as provided under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (the “Code”), and any Internal Revenue Service guidance, including Notice 2005-1, and regulations issued in connection with Section 409A of the Code. In no event, however, will a Change in Control be deemed to have occurred as a result of any acquisition of securities or assets of the Company, the Bank, or a subsidiary of either of them, by the Company, the Bank, or any subsidiary of either of them, or by any employee benefit plan maintained by any of them.

Upon a qualifying termination, the officers will receive a lump sum cash payment equal to a multiple (three times for Ms. Derrico and two times for Mr. Porter) of the sum of the named executive officer’s annual base

16

salary and his or her targeted bonus. In addition to the cash payment, the officers will receive continuation of health insurance for a period ending on the earlier of (x) the date of receipt of comparable benefits from a new employer or (y) 24 months. The agreement also provides for the immediate and total vesting of all awards under the Company’s Option Plan, any Company restricted stock, stock appreciation right, phantom stock or other equity-based compensation plan held by the officer. Such awards shall become exercisable in full, all restrictions shall lapse and all performance measures shall be deemed satisfied in full. The Company and the Bank have also agreed to pay all taxes and penalties (including the excise tax that may be levied on “excess parachute payments” under Section 4999 of the Code, plus all taxes on such payments (known as a “gross-up payment”). In addition, if the provision of any of the benefits under these agreements would trigger the 20% excise tax and interest penalties under Section 409A of the Code, then such benefits will not be provided, and in lieu thereof, the Company or the Bank will pay the named executive officer, in a lump sum, a cash amount equal to the cost of providing such benefit. The officers will also be entitled to the indemnity provided by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated Bylaws and to any directors and officers liability insurance to the same extent, upon a change in control, as other of the Company’s or affiliate’s directors and officers are covered.

In consideration of these cash payments, the officers have agreed:

Assuming that the conditions for a payment under the change in control agreements had been met as of December 31, 2006, Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter would have been entitled to receive from the Company a lump sum cash payment equal to $621,249 and $320,832 respectively. In addition, Mr. Porter would have been entitled to receive continued health insurance benefits with an estimated present value of approximately $24,327. (As of December 31, 2006, Ms. Derrico did not participate in the health plan but was covered under Mr. Porter’s plan.) If the above payments constituted parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, Ms. Derrico and Mr. Porter would also be entitled to receive gross-up payments to cover the applicable amount of taxes. No funds have been set aside or accrued to provide for the cash payments described in the agreements. Moreover, the Company has no present plans to engage in any transaction that could trigger the payment provisions of these agreements. All such payments are subject to any prohibitions, limitations and restrictions that may be applicable under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations of the FDIC.

Change in Control Provisions in Equity Plans and Agreements

The named executive officers hold stock options under a stock option plan approved by the stockholders in 2004 for officers, directors and employees (the “Option Plan”). The Option Plan provides for the grants of both incentive stock options which qualify under Section 422 of the Code and nonqualified stock options. Options will become vested and exercisable at the rate determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant; provided, however, that options granted will generally vest in approximately equal percentages each year over a period no shorter than three years. However, all options granted under the Option Plan were fully vested as of December 31, 2005. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, all options will become immediately vested and exercisable upon the optionee’s death or disability. Options granted under the Option Plan may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution after the death of the optionee.

17

Termination With a Change in Control

As of December 31, 2006, there were no unvested options outstanding that would be impacted by a change in control of the Company.

Termination Without a Change in Control

If an optionee ceases to be a director, officer or employee of the Company for any reason other than death or disability, he may, at any time within three months after his date of termination, or such longer period as may be determined by the Compensation Committee, exercise any option only to the extent it was vested and he was entitled to exercise the option on the date of termination. Any options which are not so exercised will terminate and be forfeited. If an optionee dies or ceases to be a director, officer or employee of the Company due to his disability, all unvested options of such optionee will immediately become vested and exercisable and he, or the person or persons to whom the option is transferred by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, may, at any time within 12 months after the death or date of termination, or such longer period as may be determined by the Compensation Committee, exercise any option with respect to all shares subject thereto. Any options which are not so exercised will terminate and be forfeited. Any options which are not exercised by an optionee upon termination of service as director or employee that are not exercised within the periods described above (three months for termination other than death or disability and one year due to death or disability) will terminate and be forfeited.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2006, no executive officer of the Company served as (1) a member of a compensation committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire Board of Directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Company’s Compensation Committee, (2) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Company’s Compensation Committee or (3) a member of the compensation committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire Board of Directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of the Company. In addition, none of the members of the Compensation Committee (a) was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries in 2006, (b) was formerly an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (c) had any relationship that required disclosure under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate this Proxy Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in whole or in part, the following report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee

John J. Forch (Chairman)

Neil J. Call

Charles A. Kabbash

18

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate this Proxy Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in whole or in part, the following report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

In accordance with its written charter adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company’s Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of the Company. The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member is independent in accordance with the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market and in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that Neil J. Call has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Audit Committee (i) obtained from the independent registered public accounting firm a formal written statement describing all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company that might bear on the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” (ii) discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence and (iii) satisfied itself as to the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The Audit Committee also discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm the quality and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls. The Audit Committee reviewed with both the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, “Communication with Audit Committees.” With and without management present, the Audit Committee discussed and reviewed the results of the internal and external audit examinations.

The Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and the independent registered public accounting firm has the responsibility for the examination of those statements.

Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee also recommended the appointment of Crowe Chizek and Company LLC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2007, subject to stockholder ratification, and the Board concurred in such recommendation.

The Audit Committee

Neil J. Call (Chairman)

John J. Forch

Michael A. Gaffney

19

FEES AND SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2006 and 2005 by BDO Seidman, LLP:

The Audit Committee will consider, on a case-by-case basis, and approve, if appropriate, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval of such services is required unless a “de minimus” exception is met. To qualify for the “de minimus” exception, the aggregate amount of all such services provided to the Company must constitute not more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the Company to its independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year in which the non-audit services are provided; such services were not recognized by the Company at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and the non-audit services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Committee or by one or more members of the Committee to whom authority to grant such approval has been delegated by the Committee.

20

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to the Company’s policy, the Board of Directors is required to review all related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. Under the policy, any related party transaction may be consummated or may continue only (i) if the Board approves or ratifies such transaction and if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arms’-length dealings with an unrelated third party or (ii) if the transaction has been approved by the disinterested members of the Board of Directors. The Board may approve or ratify the related party transaction only if the Board determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is in the best interests of the Company.

Many of the directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Company and the Bank (i.e., those who own 10% or more of the Common Stock) and their associates, which include corporations, partnerships and other organizations in which they are officers or partners or in which they and their immediate families have at least a 5% interest, are customers of the Bank. During 2006, the Bank made loans in the ordinary course of business to certain of the directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Company and the Bank and their associates, all of which were on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons unaffiliated with the Company and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Loans to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Company are subject to limitations contained in the Federal Reserve Act, the principal effect of which is to require that extensions of credit by the Bank to executive officers, directors and principal stockholders of the Company and the Bank satisfy the foregoing standards. As of December 31, 2006, all of such loans aggregated $388,000 which was approximately 0.74% of the Company’s Tier 1 capital at such date. The Company expects the Bank to have such transactions or transactions on a similar basis with the directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Company and the Bank and their associates in the future.

21

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY

MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company Common Stock as of February 28, 2007, by (1) each director, director nominee and named executive officer of the Company, (2) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially 5% or more of the Common Stock and (3) all directors, director nominees and named executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, based on information furnished by such stockholders, management of the Company believes that each person has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares indicated as owned by such person and the address of each stockholder is the same as the address of the Company.

22

23

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16 forms they file.

Based solely on the Company’s review of the copies of such reports furnished to it and representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the applicable filing requirements, the Company believes that during the year ended December 31, 2006, all Section 16(a) reporting requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders were complied with, except that Robin Shield filed an amended Form 3 to report holdings inadvertently omitted from her initial Form 3. These holdings have been reported to the SEC.

24

Item 2.

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

On March 2, 2007, BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO Seidman”) was dismissed as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, which dismissal was effective upon the filing of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the dismissal of BDO Seidman. The reports of BDO Seidman on the financial statements of the Company for the period from inception at April 14, 2005 through December 31, 2005 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified or modified as to any uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the period ended December 31, 2005, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, there were no disagreements between the Company and BDO Seidman on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO Seidman, would have caused BDO Seidman to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports on the Company’s financial statements for such periods. In addition, during the period from inception at April 14, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, no reportable events, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, occurred.

The Company engaged Crowe Chizek and Company LLC (“Crowe Chizek”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2007, effective March 7, 2007. The decision to engage Crowe Chizek was also approved by the Audit Committee. At no time during the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period prior to the engagement of Crowe Chizek did the Company, or someone on its behalf, consult with Crowe Chizek regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion which might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements or (ii) any matters or events listed in Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K.

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of Crowe Chizek. The ratification of such appointment will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of Crowe Chizek will be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement (if they desire to do so) and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Stockholder ratification of the selection of Crowe Chizek as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2007 fiscal year is not required by the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, state law or otherwise. However, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Crowe Chizek to the Company’s stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Crowe Chizek. Even if the selection of Crowe Chizek is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the 2007 fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLC.

25

DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

FOR 2008 ANNUAL MEETING

In order for stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act to be presented at the Company’s 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to such meeting, such proposals must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices no later than November 23, 2007. Stockholder proposals should be submitted to the Secretary of the Company at 550 Broadview Avenue, Warrenton, Virginia 20186.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

The Company will furnish, without charge, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to any stockholder upon written request to Corporate Secretary, 550 Broadview Avenue, Warrenton, Virginia 20186.

ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting, and each may be accompanied by a guest. Registration of attendees of the Annual Meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. If you attend, please note that you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license. Cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. Please also note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the Annual Meeting.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other matter before the Annual Meeting and does not know of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter does properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the person or persons voting the proxies.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the accompanying envelope at your earliest convenience.

26

é  Detach above card, sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided.  é

SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.

IF YOUR ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH THE PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.