SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

Commission file number: 001-32279

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant specified in its charter)

100 E. RiverCenter Blvd., Suite 480, Covington, KY

(Address of principal executive office)

41011

(Zip Code)

(859) 581-5900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act (check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨                    Accelerated Filer  x                    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements.

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 AND DECEMBER 31, 2005

(unaudited, $000’s omitted)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

3

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005

(unaudited, 000’s omitted, except per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

4

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005

(unaudited, 000’s omitted, except per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

5

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006

(unaudited, $000’s omitted)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

6

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

(unaudited, $000’s omitted)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

7

EAGLE HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2006 (unaudited)

1. BACKGROUND

Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (together with its subsidiaries “Eagle”, “Company”, “We”, “Us” or “Our”), is a self-advised real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed to pursue investment opportunities in the full-service and all-suites hotel industry. As of June 30, 2006, Eagle’s portfolio consists of twelve full-service and all-suites hotels under the Embassy Suites, Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt brands.

The Company commenced its operations effective as of October 1, 2004 when it completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) and acquired a 100% interest in eight hotels and a 49% interest in one other hotel (Embassy Suites Cincinnati–RiverCenter), all of which were previously owned or controlled by Corporex Companies LLC (“Corporex” or “Predecessor”). Because we had the right and obligation to acquire the remaining 51% interest in the entity that owned the Embassy Suites Cincinnati-RiverCenter from William P. Butler, the Company’s Chairman, no later than January 31, 2006 in exchange for 427,485 operating partnership units, the assets, liabilities and operations of such entity are included in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the provisions in Financial Interpretation 46(R). The remaining 51% in this hotel was acquired on December 5, 2005 for 427,485 operating partnership units.

Our operating partnership, EHP Operating Partnership, L.P. (“EHP OP”), was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the state of Maryland. The Company is the sole general partner of and owns approximately 75% of the limited partnership units in EHP OP. Limited partners (including certain of our officers and directors) own the remaining operating partnership units. After one year from the date the units are issued, limited partners may generally redeem each unit for the cash value of one share of our common stock or, at our sole option, one share of common stock.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

EHP TRS Holding Co., Inc. (“EHP TRS”), our taxable REIT subsidiary, was incorporated as a Maryland corporation. Each of our hotel properties, except the Embassy Suites San Juan Hotel, is leased to a wholly owned subsidiary of EHP TRS, which engages independent hotel management companies, such as Commonwealth Hotels, Inc. (“Commonwealth Hotels”), to manage and operate the hotels under management contracts. Lease revenue from EHP TRS and its wholly owned subsidiaries is eliminated in consolidation. Under applicable REIT tax rules, neither we nor our operating partnership can directly undertake the daily management activities of our hotels. Therefore, our principal source of funds will be dependent on EHP TRS’s ability to generate cash flow from the operation of the hotels. EHP TRS will pay income taxes at regular corporate rates on its taxable income. The Embassy Suites San Juan is leased to an unaffiliated lessee and the only income that we recognize in relation to this hotel is the lease income paid by the lessee.

2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On February 24, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the 270-room Embassy Suites Phoenix-Scottsdale for $33.1 million. This acquisition was funded through a combination of cash and the proceeds from a $22.1 million three-year, full recourse loan having an interest rate of 215 basis points over 30-day LIBOR that was collateralized by the hotel. This $22.1 million loan was paid off in December 2005 through funds drawn on our credit facility. This hotel is managed by Commonwealth Hotels.

On June 23, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the 351-room Hilton Glendale in Glendale California (“Hilton Glendale”) for $80.0 million. This acquisition was funded through a combination of cash and the proceeds from a $53.1 million bridge loan. The bridge loan was repaid on July 7, 2005 with the proceeds from a $53.1 million seven-year, interest only loan having a fixed interest rate of 5.21%. The previous owner of the Hilton Glendale had a loan with the Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GRA”). This loan had a participating feature in which the GRA would receive 1.5% of revenues above certain thresholds through 2018 and 2.0%, thereafter. The loan was paid off by the previous owner at the time we purchased the hotel and the intent was that the previous owner would enter into a cash buyout agreement of the participating feature of the loan with the GRA. This agreement was not finalized and in accordance with the hotel purchase agreement the previous owner refunded $2.5 million of the initial purchase price to us on April 13, 2006. We remain subject to the participating feature though we do not anticipate the participation payments to materially affect our financial statements in the near term.

8

On June 28, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the 299-room Embassy Suites San Juan Hotel and Casino in Isla Verde Carolina, Puerto Rico for $60.2 million. This acquisition was funded with existing cash. This hotel is leased to a third party tenant who pays a monthly base rent of $450,000, plus additional rent based upon hotel revenues. This hotel is managed by Hilton Hotels Corporation.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotels since the dates of acquisition. The purchase prices discussed above were the result of arms’ length negotiations, and Eagle did not assign any value to goodwill or other intangible assets.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Included in the consolidated financial statements are Eagle’s operating entities (“TRS”), the limited liability companies that own the hotel properties and EHP OP.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Eagle believes that all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. In addition, Eagle’s operations have historically been seasonal as certain properties experience higher occupancy rates during the different months of the year. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in Eagle’s operating results. Consequently, operating results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.

Revenue Recognition — Hotel revenues, including room, food, beverage and other hotel revenues, are recognized as the related services are delivered. We generally consider accounts receivable to be fully collectible. If we determine that amounts are uncollectible, which would generally be the result of a customer’s bankruptcy or other economic downturn, such amounts will be charged against operations when that determination is made. The lease income generated by the lease on the Embassy Suites San Juan is recognized as earned.

Investment in Hotel Properties — The initial nine hotel properties are stated at the Predecessor’s historical cost, plus an approximate $42.5 million minority interest partial step-up recorded upon formation of Eagle on October 1, 2004, related to the acquisition of minority interest from unaffiliated parties related to seven of the initial properties. Improvements and additions which extend the life of the property are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life.

For the hotels acquired in 2005, the purchase prices were the result of arms’ length negotiations, and Eagle did not assign any value to goodwill or other intangible assets.

Impairment of Investment in Hotel Properties — Hotel properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be recoverable (i.e., the future undiscounted cash flows for the hotel are projected to be less than the net book value of the hotel). We test for impairment in several situations, including when current or projected cash flows are less than historical cash flows, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a hotel’s net book value may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of the impairment of our hotels, we make many assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows, holding period, expected useful life, future capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. To date, no such impairment charges have been recognized. If an asset were deemed to be impaired, we would record an impairment charge for the amount the property’s net book value exceeds its fair value.

Stock-Based Compensation — The 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) was adopted by the board of directors and approved by Eagle’s stockholders prior to the initial public offering. The purpose of the incentive plan is to promote Eagle’s success and enhance the value of Eagle’s common stock by linking the personal interests of participants to those of the stockholders, and by providing such persons with an incentive to achieve outstanding

9

performance. The incentive plan authorizes the governance and compensation committee and Eagle’s board of directors to grant awards to employees, officers, consultants (including, but not limited to, Corporex and its employees) and directors.

Eagle accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. In connection with Eagle’s formation, Eagle established the LTIP. The Company has issued a net total of 514,180 shares of restricted stock under the LTIP to its executives, directors, and certain employees of the Company, the Predecessor and its affiliates. The vesting periods for these shares range from one to five years. Such shares are charged to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the price on the date of issuance. For the six month periods ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, the Company incurred total compensation expense of $0.3 million and $1.3 million related to these restricted shares. For the three month periods ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, the Company incurred total compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million related to these restricted shares. The higher expense in 2005 was mostly the result of the 208,332 shares issued to the Predecessor that fully vested in October 2005. Under the Stock Plan, the Company may issue a variety of performance-based stock awards, including nonqualified stock options. At June 30, 2006, no performance-based stock awards have been issued other than the restricted stock discussed above. The amount of shares available for issuance under this plan increased by 125,245 shares on January 1, 2006, pursuant to the provisions of the plan. At June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately 605,832 remaining shares available for future issuance under the LTIP. As required upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the contra equity balance in unearned compensation on restricted stock of $1.7 million as of January 1, 2006 was reversed (i.e. netted into additional paid-in capital) in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the period ending March 31, 2006.

A summary of the Company’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006 is as follows:

Segments — Eagle presently operates in one business segment within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel investments. Direct hotel investments refers to owning hotels through either acquisition or new development. The Predecessor also only operated within the direct hotel investments segment.

4. PREFERRED STOCK OFFERING

On June 13, 2005, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 4,000,000 shares of its 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Preferred Shares”). The Preferred Shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share and will be redeemable at the option of the Company on or after June 14, 2010. The annual distribution for the Preferred Shares will be $2.0625 per share. Dividends on the Preferred Shares will be payable quarterly in arrears on the last calendar day of March, June, September and December.

The net proceeds of the public offering of the Preferred Shares were $96.5 million, after underwriters discounts and other offering expenses. The proceeds were used in the acquisitions of the Hilton Glendale and the Embassy Suites San Juan, as well as for other general corporate and working capital purposes.

5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The limited partners’ outstanding limited partnership units in the operating partnership (which may be redeemed for common stock upon notice from the limited partner and following our election to redeem the units for stock rather than cash) have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as there would be no effect on the amounts since the limited partners’ share of income would also be added back to net income. The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is presented below:

10

6. MINORITY INTEREST

Minority interest in the operating partnership represents the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Net income (loss) is allocated to minority interest based on limited partnership percentage ownership for the period. Upon formation of the Company on October 1, 2004, the Company issued 5,566,352 units of limited partnership interest to affiliates, plus another 427,485 partnership units were issued on December 5, 2005 in exchange for the remaining 51% of the Embassy Suites Hotel Cincinnati – RiverCenter. An additional 250,000 partnership units were issued to the former owners of the Embassy Suites Hotel Denver International Airport on December 5, 2005, in compliance with the earn-out provisions in the original purchase agreement. An additional 83,333 partnership units were issued to the former owner of the Embassy Suites Hotel Dublin-Columbus on July 24, 2006, in compliance with the earnout provisions of the original purchase agreement. After a one-year holding period from the date of issuance, partnership units may be redeemed for the cash value of one share of our common stock or, at our sole option, one share of common stock. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, 326,111 and 0 partnership units were redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of our common stock. During the three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, 49,801 and 0 partnership units were redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2006 there are 5,917,726 partnership units outstanding which represent an approximate minority interest ownership of 25%. These exchanges are non-cash items.

11

7. DEBT

Eagle’s notes payable as of June 30, 2006 are as follows:

Total debt maturities, including capital lease obligations, as of June 30, 2006 were as follows ($000s):

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Hotel Management Agreements - Nine of our hotels are subject to management agreements with Commonwealth Hotels. Under these agreements, Eagle is obligated to pay monthly management fees equal to 2.50% of gross revenues in 2005, 2.75% in 2006, and 3.00% of gross revenues in 2007 and the years thereafter. Incentive fees may also be earned upon meeting certain net operating income thresholds. These management agreements have ten-year terms, with a renewal option for one additional five-year period. If Eagle terminates a management agreement on any of the properties prior to its expiration, due to sale of the property, Eagle may be required to pay a substantial termination fee. Eagle’s Chairman is the majority shareholder in Commonwealth Hotels. Management fees earned by Commonwealth Hotels for the six months ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were $1.4 million and $1.3 million. The fees management fees earned for the three months ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were $0.7 million and $0.7 million. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Eagle owed Commonwealth Hotels $0.3 and $0.2 million in management fees payable, respectively.

Strategic Alliance Agreement – Eagle has entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement (“SAA”) with Corporex and affiliated parties. The SAA provides Eagle with the right of first refusal for development opportunities with Corporex and affiliates, as well as a non-compete clause for markets in which we own or have an investment. The agreement expires October 1, 2014. Corporex received 208,332 shares of common stock in conjunction with the SAA. The shares vested October 6, 2005. For the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2005, Eagle incurred approximately $1.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in expense as a result of the amortization of these shares.

Leased Office Space - Eagle’s headquarters are located in an office building that is owned by a limited partnership in which Eagle’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are limited partners. We entered into a lease for this office space subsequent to our IPO at terms approximating the fair market value. We are obligated to pay $0.6 million in rent over a ten-year period, or on average, approximately $5,000 per month. The expense of this lease is

12

being recognized on a straight-line basis. In addition to the rent payments, we will also be subject to a common area maintenance fee allocation related to this office space of approximately $2,000 per month. Eagle believes the lease payments do not exceed market value.

9. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

On March 8, 2006, Eagle declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and operating partnership unit. This dividend was paid on April 17, 2006, to holders of record as of March 31, 2006. The total amount of the dividends paid to holders of our common stock was $3.1 million and $1.0 million was paid to holders of operating partnership units.

On March 8, 2006, Eagle declared a quarterly dividend of $0.515625 per 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share for the period ended March 31, 2006 to holders of record as of March 16, 2006. The total amount of dividends paid to holders of the preferred shares was $2.1 million and was paid on March 31, 2006.

On June 2, 2006, Eagle declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and operating partnership unit. This dividend was paid on July 14, 2006, to holders of record as of June 30, 2006. The total amount of the dividends paid to holders of our common stock was $3.1 million and $1.0 million was paid to holders of operating partnership units.

On June 2, 2006, Eagle declared a quarterly dividend of $0.515625 per 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share for the period ended June 30, 2006 to holders of record as of June 15, 2006. The total amount of dividends paid to holders of the preferred shares was $2.1 million and was paid on June 30, 2006.

During the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2006, 326,111 and 49,801 of our operating partnership units were redeemed for an equal number of common shares. This redemption reduced our operating partnership units outstanding to 5,917,726. These redemptions are non-cash items.

Interest paid by Eagle during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was $5.9 million and $4.3 million. Interest paid during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was $3.1 million and $2.2 million.

During the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2006, Eagle granted approximately 52,000 shares and 3,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at approximately $450,000 and $26,000, respectively, under its LTIP. Approximately 3,000 shares of restricted stock due to employee resignations, valued at approximately $30,000, were cancelled during the six months ended June 30, 2006, with no cancellations occurring during the three months ended June 30, 2006. During the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2005, Eagle granted 23,800 shares and 20,000 shares, valued at approximately $216,000 and $180,000, under its LTIP. There were 20,833 shares cancelled due to employee resignations during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2005, valued at approximately $203,000.

10. INCOME TAXES

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distributes at least 90% of the Company’s taxable income to the Company’s shareholders. The Company currently intends to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s REIT status. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. If the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on the Company’s income as well as to federal income and excise taxes on the Company’s undistributed taxable income.

The Company had a net tax expense(benefit) of $909 and $(1,490), respectively, for the six month periods ending June 30, 2006 and 2005.

13

The Company had a net tax expense of $546 and $5, respectively, for the three month periods ending June 30, 2006 and 2005.

The Company’s deferred tax asset related to its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) consisted of the following for the periods ending June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

The Company had an income tax payable of $267 and $565, respectively as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

11. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF’s consensus on Issue No. 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” This consensus established the presumption that general partners in a limited partnership control that limited partnership regardless of the extent of the general partners’ ownership interest in the limited partnership. The consensus further establishes that the rights of the limited partners can overcome the presumption of control by the general partners, if the limited partners have either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights. Whether the presumption of control is overcome is a matter of judgment based on the facts and circumstances, for which the consensus provides additional guidance. This consensus applies to limited partnerships or similar entities, such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership. Adoption did not have a material effect on the Company.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and it seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of measurement and recognition in accounting for

14

income taxes. In addition, FIN 48 requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes and is effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year. We do not anticipate the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Restricted Cash — Under certain existing mortgage loan and hotel management agreements, Eagle is obligated to escrow payments for insurance, real estate taxes and 4% to 5% of gross revenue of certain properties for capital improvements.

Contingent Consideration — At the time we acquired our initial hotels, we agreed to make earn-out payments totaling in the aggregate up to 833,333 additional operating partnership units, which are be payable to the original contributors of the Embassy Suites Hotel Columbus/Dublin, the Embassy Suites Hotel Cleveland/Rockside and the Embassy Suites Hotel Denver-International Airport only if certain operating measurements are achieved on any trailing 12-month basis within three years from the contribution. For the 12-month period ended September 30, 2005, the Embassy Suites Hotel Denver-International Airport exceeded the operating measurements required to receive the additional 250,000 operating partnership units pursuant to the earn-out provisions of the original contribution agreement. These operating partnership units were issued to the former owners of that hotel on December 5, 2005. For the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, the Embassy Suites Hotel Dublin-Columbus exceeded the operating measurements required to receive the additional 83,333 operating partnership units pursuant to the earn-out provisions of the original contribution agreement. These operating partnership units were issued to the former owner of that hotel on July 24, 2006.

Franchise Fees — All of our hotels, except the Hyatt Regency Rochester, operate under franchise agreements. In conjunction with these franchise agreements, Eagle is obligated to pay the franchisors royalty fees between 4% and 6% of gross room revenue, and under certain agreements, fees for marketing, reservations, and other related activities aggregating between 1% and 4% of gross room revenue. In addition, the Marriott hotels are obligated to pay between 2% and 3% for food and beverage revenues. Franchise fees are included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line of the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Litigation — We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Taxes — Under tax indemnification agreements with the contributors of certain initial hotels, Eagle has agreed to provide tax indemnification to the original contributors against certain tax consequences of a sale. We have agreed to pay the contributor’s tax liability with respect to gain allocated to the contributor under Section 704(C) of the Internal Revenue Code if we dispose of a property contributed by the contributor in a taxable transaction during a “protected period”, which continues until the earlier of: a) October 1, 2014, or b) the date on which the contributor no longer owns, in the aggregate, at least 25% of the units we issued to the contributor at the time of its contribution of property to our operating partnership.

13. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, comprehensive income was $2,496,000 and $2,398,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, comprehensive income was $2,098,000 and $1,764,000. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Eagle’s accumulated other comprehensive income was $15,000 and $9,000, respectively. The change in accumulated other comprehensive income was entirely due to Eagle’s unrealized gains on its marketable securities.

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 21, 2006, we completed the acquisition of the 273-room Embassy Suites Boston at Logan International Airport for $53.4 million. The hotel is subject to a 90-year ground lease. This hotel is managed by Prism Hotels & Resorts. This acquisition was funded via our $110 million unsecured credit facility, having an interest rate of 200 basis points over 30-day LIBOR. The credit facility was also amended to delay the phase-in of a

15

stricter financial covenant. Effective with this amendment, our senior unsecured credit facility now requires that the ratio of our total liabilities to total asset value not exceed 58% through December 31, 2006, 55% from the period January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 and 53% thereafter.

At the time we acquired our initial hotels, we agreed to make earn-out payments totaling in the aggregate up to 833,333 additional operating partnership units, which are be payable to the original contributors of the Embassy Suites Hotel Columbus/Dublin, the Embassy Suites Hotel Cleveland/Rockside and the Embassy Suites Hotel Denver-International Airport only if certain operating measurements are achieved on any trailing 12-month basis within three years from the contribution. For the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, the Embassy Suites Hotel Dublin-Columbus exceeded the operating measurements required to receive the additional 83,333 operating partnership units pursuant to the earn-out provisions of the original contribution agreement. These operating partnership units were issued to the former owner of that hotel on July 24, 2006.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

We make forward-looking statements throughout this Form 10-Q that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, and objectives. Statements regarding the following subjects are forward-looking by their nature:

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. You should carefully consider this risk when you make an investment decision concerning our common stock. Additionally, the following factors could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements:

16

When we use the words “will likely result,” “may,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (together with its subsidiaries “Eagle” or “Company”), is a self-advised real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed to pursue investment opportunities in the full-service and all-suites hotel industry. As of June 30, 2006, Eagle’s portfolio consists of twelve full-service and all-suites hotels under the Embassy Suites, Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt brands.

Our goal is to generate strong risk-adjusted returns on invested capital for our stockholders by consistently paying attractive dividends and achieving long-term appreciation in full-service and all-suites hotel investments. The Company seeks to fund a substantial percentage of new investments with capital “recycled” from the disposition of owned assets. Assets may be disposed of when potential acquisitions present themselves offering higher returns on the capital employed than the assets currently owned by the Company.

Eagle enjoyed a successful first half of 2006 as virtually all geographic regions experienced year over year growth with business and group transient demand leading the way.

For the second quarter of 2006, the Company had net income available to common shareholders of $2.1 million, or $0.12 per diluted share. FFO was $6.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share/unit and EBITDA was $12.5 million. RevPAR was $100.94.

For the first half of 2006, the Company had net income available to common shareholders of $2.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share. FFO was $11.2 million, or $0.48 per diluted share/unit and EBITDA was $22.4 million. RevPAR was $100.28.

FIRST HALF HIGHLIGHTS AND OUTLOOK FOR THE REMAINDER OF 2006

Refer to the “Results of Operations” section below for discussion of our first half and second quarter 2006 results compared to 2005 results.

In the hotel industry most categories of operating costs do not vary directly with the volume of sales, the exceptions being franchise, management, credit card fees and the costs of the food and beverages served. Because of this operating leverage, changes in sales volume disproportionately impact operating results. Room revenue is the most important category of revenue and drives other revenue categories such as food and beverage and telephone. There are three key performance indicators used in the hotel industry to measure room sales:

17

Due to a strengthening economy and the aggressive management of our hotels, our portfolio saw RevPAR increase by 11.3%, from $90.10 for the first half of 2005 to $100.28 for the first half of 2006. The portfolio occupancy improved by 4.6% to 73.5% and the ADR improved 6.4% to $136.39. For the second quarter of 2006, our portfolio saw RevPAR increase by 8.0%, to $100.94 from $93.50 for the second quarter of 2005. The portfolio occupancy improved by 1.9% to 75.6% and the ADR improved 6.0% to $133.46. The western portion of our portfolio showed the largest improvement in RevPAR by increasing 12.0% to $110.78 for the second quarter of 2006 as compared to $98.90 for the second quarter of 2005. This increase shows the significance in the geographical diversification of our portfolio as two of the three hotels in the West were hotels that we acquired in 2005.

On March 8, 2006, Eagle declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and operating partnership unit. This dividend was paid on April 17, 2006, to holders of record as of March 31, 2006. The total amount of the dividends paid to holders of our common stock was $3.1 million and $1.0 million was paid to holders of operating partnership units.

On March 8, 2006, Eagle declared a quarterly dividend of $0.515625 per 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share for the period ended March 31, 2006 to holders of record as of March 16, 2006. The total amount of dividends paid to holders of the preferred shares was $2.1 million and was paid on March 31, 2006.

On June 2, 2006, Eagle declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and operating partnership unit. This dividend was paid on July 14, 2006, to holders of record as of June 30, 2006. The total amount of the dividends paid to holders of our common stock was $3.1 million and $1.0 million was paid to holders of operating partnership units.

On June 2, 2006, Eagle declared a quarterly dividend of $0.515625 per 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share for the period ended June 30, 2006 to holders of record as of June 15, 2006. The total amount of dividends paid to holders of the preferred shares was $2.1 million and was paid on June 30, 2006.

On July 21, 2006, we completed the acquisition of the 273-room Embassy Suites Boston at Logan International Airport for $53.4 million. This acquisition is part of our stated strategy to diversify the geography of our portfolio. In addition, we intend to sell one or more of our other hotels in the next 180 days. We have identified the Embassy Suites Boston at Logan-International Airport as a replacement property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, which enables us to structure such future dispositions as tax-free exchanges assuming the other requirements of Section 1031 are met. No assurances can be given that we will sell any of our hotels on favorable terms, if at all, or that we will satisfy the requirements under Section 1031 for a tax-free exchange.

For the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, the Embassy Suites Hotel Dublin-Columbus exceeded the operating measurements required to receive the additional 83,333 operating partnership units pursuant to the earn-out provisions of the original contribution agreement. These operating partnership units were issued to the former owner of that hotel on July 24, 2006.

Interest paid by Eagle during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was $5.9 million and $4.3 million. Interest paid during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was $3.1 million and $2.2 million.

During the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2006, Eagle granted approximately 52,000 shares and 3,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at approximately $450,000 and $26,000, respectively, under its LTIP. Approximately 3,000 shares of restricted stock due to employee resignations, valued at approximately $30,000, were cancelled during the six months ended June 30, 2006, with no cancellations occurring during the three months ended June 30, 2006. During the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2005, Eagle granted 23,800 shares and 20,000 shares, valued at approximately $216,000 and $180,000, under its LTIP. There were 20,833 shares cancelled due to employee resignations during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2005, valued at approximately $203,000.

18

During the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, 326,111 and 0 partnership units were redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of our common stock. During the three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, 49,801 and 0 partnership units were redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2006 there are 5,917,726 partnership units outstanding which represent an approximate minority interest ownership of 25%. These exchanges are non-cash items.

Management expects revenues and net income will be higher for the second half of 2006 than the second half of 2005. However, we anticipate that the rate of growth is likely to be lower in the second half of 2006 than it was in the first half. Management expects to see increases for the second half of 2006 over the same period last year for the following reasons:

It should be noted that despite the positive trends and events noted above, increases in revenues and net income for the remainder of 2006 may not be as strong as those seen in the first half of 2006. Our hotels, especially those in the Midwest that depend more on transient leisure travelers, are vulnerable to downturns in leisure travel brought on by increased gas prices. Also, as room rates are increasing, we are seeing a slowing in food & beverage revenues.

This foregoing forward-looking statement is subject to risks and uncertainties. For more information, see the introductory paragraphs of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located on page 17.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There were no changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates made by management in the three months ended June 30, 2006. For a more detailed description of our critical accounting policies, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to December 31, 2005

Total notes payable debt decreased $6.6 million from $211.4 million to $204.8 million, or 3.1%.

Total assets decreased $10.7 million, the result of depreciation and amortization, reduced restricted replacement reserves used hotel capital expenditures and reduced unrestricted cash.

The unrestricted cash balance decreased $1.6 million from December 31, 2005. This decrease is the result of $12.4 million in dividends and distributions paid to the preferred and common shareholders, $5.7 million of hotel capital expenditures, and a net credit facility paydown of $6.0 million largely offset by cash generated by hotel operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2005

19

Revenue. Total revenues increased $9.7 million, or 33.7%, from $28.8 million in the second quarter of 2005 to $38.5 million in the second quarter of 2006. $8.0 million of the increase was related to the hotels acquired in 2005. In addition, the revenues at the Chicago Marriott Southwest at Burr Ridge increased by $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2006 as this hotel continues to gain market share after having opened in August 2004. The Embassy Suites Hotel Tampa/Westshore and the Embassy Suites Hotel Dublin each saw quarterly revenue gains of $0.3 million.

Our portfolio RevPAR increased from $93.50 to $100.94 for the second quarter of 2006, or 8.0%. Aside from the Chicago Marriott Southwest at Burr Ridge, which opened in August 2004 and showed a 19.7% second quarter RevPAR improvement, the largest RevPAR increases occurred at the Embassy Suites Hotel Phoenix/Scottsdale and the Hilton Glendale.

It is important to note that 75% of our second quarter RevPAR growth resulted from gains in ADR. A key part of our asset management strategy is to focus on the growth of ADR as a more sustainable revenue strategy than to simply boost occupancy through underpricing the competition.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses increased by $6.4 million, from $23.8 million, or 26.9%, during the second quarter of 2005, to $30.2 million in the second quarter of 2006. Of this increase, approximately $5.1 million was related to the hotels acquired in 2005. Another $0.3 million of increases were seen in the areas of corporate expense, insurance and real estate taxes. The remainder of the increase was largely due to items that vary directly with an increase in revenues, such as housekeeping expense and franchise, management and credit card fees.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Total depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.0 million, or 32.3%, from $3.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 to $4.1 million during the same period in 2006. This increase is related to the depreciation of the hotels acquired in 2005, somewhat offset by declining depreciation amounts at our existing hotels as certain assets, in particular, furniture and fixtures, become fully depreciated.

Operating Income. Net operating income increased by $3.3 million, or 66%, to $8.3 million in the second quarter of 2006 from $5.0 million during the second quarter of 2005. The increase was the result of the net operating income provided by the 2005 hotel acquisitions, the increases shown by the existing hotels and a decrease of $1.0 million in stock based compensation. Somewhat offsetting these increases were increases of $1.0 million in depreciation and amortization expense and $0.1 million of corporate expense.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased in the second quarter of 2006 by approximately $0.7 million, or 30.4%, to $3.0 million from $2.3 million in 2005. The increase is the result of the debt incurred related to the acquisitions of the Embassy Suites Hotel Phoenix/Scottsdale, Hilton Glendale and the Embassy Suites Hotel & Casino San Juan, offset to some extent by the refinancings that occurred in 2005.

Income Tax Expense. A net income tax expense of $0.5 million was booked for the three month period ending June 30, 2006 as compared to $0 million for the same period in 2005. This was the result of higher taxable income in 2006 as compared to 2005 and amendments to the TRS leases that were effective January 1, 2006.

Minority Interest. Minority interest in the operating partnership represents the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Income is allocated to minority interest based on the weighted average percentage ownership during the quarter. For the three month period ending June 30, 2006, the weighted average percentage of the limited partners’ ownership was approximately 25%. As a result of this ownership percentage, the portion of the income earned during the second quarter of 2006 and allocated to the minority interest was $0.7 million as compared to $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2005.

Distributions to Preferred Shareholders. During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company made distributions in the amount of the $2.1 million related to the Series A Preferred Shares. These shares were issued as the result of a public offering that closed on June 13, 2005. The prorated distributions in the same period for 2005 were $0.4 million.

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders. The net income available to common shareholders of approximately $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2006 represented an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or 16.7%, from the $1.8 million recognized in the second quarter of 2005. The increase was due to the increased income generated by our hotels, in particular, the 2005 acquisitions largely offset by the preferred share distribution and income tax expense.

20

Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

Revenue. Total revenues increased $23.2 million, or 45.9%, from $50.5 million for the first six months of 2005 to $73.7 million for the first six months of 2006. $17.9 million of the increase was related to the hotels acquired in 2005. In addition, the revenues at the Chicago Marriott Southwest at Burr Ridge increased by $1.0 million in the six months of 2006 compared to 2005, as this hotel continues to gain market share after having opened in August 2004. All of our remaining hotels showed revenue gains of $0.3 million to $0.8 million providing support for our views on improving market conditions.

Our portfolio RevPAR increased from $90.10 to $100.28 for the first half of 2006, or 11.3%. Aside from the Chicago Marriott Southwest at Burr Ridge, which opened in August 2004 and showed a significant first half RevPAR improvement, the largest RevPAR increases occurred at the Hilton Glendale and the Embassy Suites Hotel Tampa Airport/Westshore.

It is especially important to note the 11.6% RevPAR increase at the Embassy Suites Hotel Cincinnati-RiverCenter as this hotel showed a net RevPAR decrease for the second half of 2005. Hotel renovations in 2005 adversely affected occupancy.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses increased by $15.6 million, or 35.5%, from $44.0 million during the first six months of 2006, to $59.6 million in the first six months of 2006. Of this increase, approximately $10.0 million was related to the hotels acquired in 2005. Due to changes in brand standards there was increased linen expense of $0.4 million in the first half of 2006. Our hotels incurred $0.5 million in increased real estate tax, insurance and energy expense. There was an increase of $0.4 million in corporate expense. Also, approximately $0.1 million of the increase was due to the change in the management fee rate charged by Commonwealth Hotels from 2.5% to 2.75% pursuant to thee terms of the management agreements negotiated with Commonwealth Hotels at our IPO. The remainder of the increase was largely due to items that vary directly with an increase in revenues, such as housekeeping expense and franchise, management and credit card fees.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Total depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.4 million, or 41.4%, from $5.8 million in 2005 to $8.2 million during the same period in 2006. Virtually all of this increase is related to the depreciation of the hotels acquired in 2005.

Operating Income. Net operating income increased by $7.6 million, or 119%, to $14.0 million in first half of 2006 from $6.4 million during the first half of 2005. The increase was the result of the net operating income provided by the 2005 hotel acquisitions, the increases shown by the existing hotels and a decrease of $1.0 million in stock based compensation. Somewhat offsetting these increases were increases of $2.4 million in depreciation and amortization expense and $0.4 million of corporate expense.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased in the first six months of 2006 by approximately $1.4 million, or 31.1%, to $5.9 million from $4.5 million in 2005. The increase is the result of the debt incurred related to the acquisitions of the Embassy Suites Hotel Phoenix/Scottsdale, Hilton Glendale and the Embassy Suites Hotel & Casino San Juan, offset to some extent by the refinancings that occurred in 2005.

Income Tax Expense. A net income tax expense of $0.9 million was booked for the six month period ending June 30, 2006 as compared to a net income tax benefit of $1.5 million for the same period in 2005. This was the result of higher taxable income in 2006 as compared to 2005 and amendments to the TRS leases that were effective January 1, 2006.

As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $2.6 million due to prior year losses by the TRS. Management believes that it is more likely than not that this deferred tax asset will be realized. There is a valuation allowance of $0.1 million for the state and local portion of this deferred asset because the realization is deemed to be less likely due to tax law changes.

21

Minority Interest. Minority interest in the operating partnership represents the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Income is allocated to minority interest based on the weighted average percentage ownership during the quarter. For the six month period ending June 30, 2006, the weighted average percentage of the limited partners’ ownership was approximately 25%. As a result of this ownership percentage, the portion of the income earned during the first six months of 2006 and 2005 and allocated to the minority interest was $0.8 million.

Distributions to Preferred Shareholders. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company made distributions in the amount of the $4.1 million related to the Series A Preferred Shares. These shares were issued as the result of a public offering that closed on June 13, 2005. The prorated distributions in the same period for 2005 were $0.4 million.

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders. The net income available to common shareholders of approximately $2.5 million in the first six months of 2006 represented an increase of approximately $0.1 million, from the $2.4 million recognized in the first six months of 2005. The increase was due to the increased income generated by our hotels, in particular, the 2005 acquisitions largely offset by the preferred share distribution and income tax expense.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

The White Paper on Funds From Operations (“FFO”) approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) in April 2002 defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and extraordinary items as defined by GAAP, plus certain items such as real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustment for any minority interest deriving from unconsolidated entities and joint ventures. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP net income. Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has improved the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and made comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management considers FFO to be a useful measure of adjusted earnings for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income (loss), which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO assists in comparing the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.

We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards established by NAREIT which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than us. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income as an indication of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. FFO may include funds that may not be available for the Company’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures and property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.

The following is a reconciliation between net income and FFO for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively (in thousands, except share amounts):

NET INCOME TO FFO RECONCILIATION

22

NET INCOME TO FFO RECONCILIATION

EBITDA

EBITDA herein is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe that EBITDA is helpful to investors and management as a measure of the performance of the Company because it provides an indication of the operating performance of the properties within the portfolio and is not impacted by the capital structure of the REIT. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income as an indication of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for the Company’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures and property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.

The following is a reconciliation between net income and EBITDA for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively (in thousands):

NET INCOME TO EBITDA RECONCILIATION

NET INCOME TO EBITDA RECONCILIATION

23

Key Hotel Operating Statistics

The following table illustrates key operating statistics of our portfolio for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006. This table assumes that the third party lessee structure for the Embassy San Juan Hotel & Casino does not exist:

For comparative purposes this schedule includes the Embassy Suites Hotel Phoenix, which was acquired on February 24, 2005, the Hilton Glendale, which was acquired on June 23, 2005 and the Embassy Suites Hotel & Casino San Juan, which was acquired on June 28, 2005, for the entire three months ending June 30, 2006 and 2005.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal source of funds to meet our cash requirements, including distributions to stockholders, is our share of the operating partnership’s cash flow. The operating partnership’s principal source of revenue will be the cash flow provided by the hotel operations. We also plan to recycle capital by disposing of stabilized assets when attractive opportunities are available.

Below is a comparison of the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. (000’s):

Cash flow from hotel operations is subject to all operating risks common to the hotel industry, including:

24