Table of Contents

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-201338

PROSPECTUS

36,754,769 Shares

MPM Holdings Inc.

Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the offer and resale of up to an aggregate of 36,754,769 shares of common stock of MPM Holdings Inc. by the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus. We are not selling any shares under this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares being offered by the selling stockholders.

The selling stockholders may offer shares of our common stock from time to time, if and to the extent as they may determine, through public or private transactions or through other means described under “Plan of Distribution” at prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may sell shares through agents they select or through underwriters and dealers they select. The selling stockholders also may sell shares directly to investors. If the selling stockholders use agents, underwriters or dealers to sell the shares, we will name such agents, underwriters or dealers and describe any applicable commissions or discounts in a supplement to this prospectus if required.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX Marketplace (the “OTCQX”) under the symbol “MPMQ”. On March 14, 2016, the closing price of our common stock was $6.75 per share.

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 of this prospectus for a discussion of certain risks that you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Prospectus dated May 12, 2016.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For investors outside the United States: We have not done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. You are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

i

Table of Contents

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Prior to October 24, 2014, the date we emerged from bankruptcy (the “Emergence Date”), MPM Holdings Inc. (“Momentive”) had not conducted any business operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted or suggested by context, all financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes, as of and prior to the Emergence Date, as contained in this prospectus, reflect the actual historical consolidated results of operations and financial condition of Momentive Performance Materials Inc. (“MPM”) for the periods presented and do not give effect to the Plan of Reorganization (as defined below) or any of the transactions contemplated thereby or the adoption of “fresh-start” accounting. Thus, such financial information may not be representative of our performance or financial condition after the Emergence Date. Except with respect to such historical financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes or as otherwise noted or suggested by the context, all other information contained in this prospectus relates to Momentive and its subsidiaries following the Emergence Date. When we use the terms “we,” the “Company,” “us,” “our” or similar words in this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to Momentive and its subsidiaries following emergence from the Bankruptcy Cases (as defined below).

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS

This prospectus includes estimates of market share and industry data and forecasts that we obtained from industry publications and surveys and/or internal company sources. Industry publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources, nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Similarly, while we believe our internal estimates with respect to our industry are reliable, our estimates have not been verified by any independent sources. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented in this prospectus, our estimates, in particular as they relate to market share and our general expectations, involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Unless otherwise noted, all information regarding our market share is based on the latest market data currently available to us, and all market share data is based on net sales in the applicable market.

TRADEMARKS

We have proprietary rights to or are exclusively licensed to use a number of registered and unregistered trademarks that we believe are important to our business, including, without limitation, Momentive. We attempt to obtain registration of our key trademarks whenever possible or practicable and pursue any infringement of those trademarks. Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks and tradenames referred to in this prospectus are without the “^®” and “TM” symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensors to these trademarks, service marks and tradenames.

ii

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

3

Table of Contents

4

Table of Contents

5

Table of Contents

6

Table of Contents

7

Table of Contents

8

Table of Contents

9

Table of Contents

10

Table of Contents

11

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. In such a case, you may lose all or a part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

If global economic conditions weaken or deteriorate, it will negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Global economic and financial market conditions, including severe market disruptions and the potential for a significant and prolonged global economic downturn, have impacted or could continue to impact our business operations in a number of ways including, but not limited to, the following:

Global economic conditions may weaken or deteriorate. In such event, we may become subject to the negative effects described above and our liquidity, as well as our ability to maintain compliance with the financial maintenance covenants, if in effect, in the ABL Facility could be significantly affected. See “Risks Related to Our Indebtedness—We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our consolidated debt service payments.” As a result, it may cause us to defer needed capital expenditures, reduce research and development or other spending, defer costs to achieve productivity and synergy programs, sell assets or incur additional borrowings which may not be available or may only be available on terms significantly less advantageous than our current credit terms and could result in a wide-ranging and prolonged impact on general business conditions, thereby negatively impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if the global economic environment deteriorates or remains slow for an extended period of time, the fair value of our reporting units could be more adversely affected than we estimated in our analysis of reporting unit fair values at the Effective Date of October 24, 2014. This could result in goodwill or other asset impairments, which could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

12

Table of Contents

Fluctuations in direct or indirect raw material costs could have an adverse impact on our business.

The prices of our direct and indirect raw materials have been, and we expect them to continue to be, volatile. If the cost of direct or indirect raw materials increases significantly and we are unable to offset the increased costs with higher selling prices, our profitability will decline. Increases in prices for our products could also hurt our ability to remain both competitive and profitable in the markets in which we compete.

Although some of our materials contracts include competitive price clauses that allow us to buy outside the contract if market pricing falls below contract pricing, and certain contracts have minimum-maximum monthly volume commitments that allow us to take advantage of spot pricing, we may be unable to purchase raw materials at market prices. In addition, some of our customer contracts have fixed prices for a certain term, and as a result, we may not be able to pass on raw material price increases to our customers immediately, if at all. Due to differences in timing of the pricing trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact that can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices. Future raw material prices may be impacted by new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, changes in our supplier manufacturing processes as some of our products are byproducts of these processes, interruptions in production by suppliers, natural disasters, volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and changes in exchange rates.

An inadequate supply of direct or indirect raw materials and intermediate products could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our manufacturing operations require adequate supplies of raw materials and intermediate products on a timely basis. The loss of a key source or a delay in shipments could have a material adverse effect on our business. Raw material availability may be subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things:

Many of our raw materials and intermediate products are available in the quantities we require from a limited number of suppliers.

For example, our silicones business is highly dependent upon access to silicon metal, a key raw material, and siloxane, an intermediate product that is derived from silicon metal. While silicon is itself abundant, silicon metal is produced through a manufacturing process and, in certain geographic areas, is currently available through a limited number of suppliers. In North America, there are only two significant silicon metal suppliers. In 2009 and 2010, two of our competitors acquired silicon metal manufacturing assets in North America and Europe, respectively, becoming vertically integrated in silicon metal for a portion of their supply requirements and reducing the manufacturing base of certain independent silicon metal producers. In addition, silicon metal producers face a number of regulations that affect the supply or price of silicon metal in some or all of the jurisdictions in which we operate. For example, significant anti-dumping duties of up to 139.5% imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission against producers of silicon metal in China and Russia effectively block the sale by all or most producers in these jurisdictions to U.S. purchasers, which restricts the supply of silicon metal and results in increased prices. We currently purchase silicon metal under multi-year, one-year or short-term contracts and in the spot market. We typically purchase silicon metal under contracts in the United States and Europe and in the spot market in Asia Pacific.

Our silicones business also relies heavily on siloxane as an intermediate product. Our manufacturing capacity at our internal sites and our joint venture in China is sufficient to meet the substantial majority of our

13

Table of Contents

current siloxane requirements. We also source a portion of our requirements from ASM under an existing purchase and sale agreement. In addition, from time to time we enter into supply agreements with other third parties to take advantage of favorable pricing and minimize our cost. There are also a limited number of third-party siloxane providers, and the supply of siloxane may be limited from time to time. In addition, regulation of siloxane producers can also affect the supply of siloxane. For example, in January 2006, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China issued a final determination of an anti-dumping investigation that imposed anti-dumping duties on all siloxane manufacturers, including us, ranging from 13% to 22%. These duties were terminated in January 2011. In late May 2009, China’s Ministry of Commerce also concluded an anti-dumping investigation of siloxane manufacturers in Thailand and South Korea, which resulted in an imposition of a 5.4% duty against our supplier, ASM, in Thailand, a 21.8% duty against other Thailand companies and a 25.1% duty against Korean companies.

Our quartz production relies heavily on naturally occurring quartz sand, which is currently available from a limited number of suppliers. A significant amount of the market for this sand is controlled by Unimin. In April 2015, we entered into a long term purchase agreement with Unimin, which is effective as of January 1, 2013 and expires on December 31, 2016.

Should any of our key suppliers fail to deliver these or other raw materials or intermediate products to us or no longer supply us, we may be unable to purchase these materials in necessary quantities, which could adversely affect our volumes, or may not be able to purchase them at prices that would allow us to remain competitive. During the past several years, certain of our suppliers have experienced force majeure events rendering them unable to deliver all, or a portion of, the contracted-for raw materials. On these occasions, we were forced to purchase replacement raw materials in the open market at significantly higher costs or place our customers on an allocation of our products. In addition, we cannot predict whether new regulations or restrictions may be imposed in the future on silicon metal, siloxane or other key materials, which may result in reduced supply or further increases in prices. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to renew our current materials contracts or enter into replacement contracts on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Fluctuations in the price of these or other raw materials or intermediate products, the loss of a key source of supply or any delay in the supply could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

Our production facilities are subject to significant operating hazards which could cause environmental contamination, personal injury and loss of life, and severe damage to, or destruction of property and equipment.

Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacturing, handling, storage and transportation of chemical materials and products, including human exposure to hazardous substances, pipeline and equipment leaks and ruptures, explosions, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remedial complications, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, storage tank leaks and other environmental risks. Additionally, a number of our operations are adjacent to operations of independent entities that engage in hazardous and potentially dangerous activities. Our operations or adjacent operations could result in personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property or equipment, environmental damage, or a loss of the use of all or a portion of one of our key manufacturing facilities. Such events at our facilities or adjacent third-party facilities, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may incur losses beyond the limits or coverage of our insurance policies for liabilities that are associated with these hazards. In addition, various kinds of insurance for companies in the chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms, or, in some cases, have been unavailable altogether. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.

14

Table of Contents

Environmental obligations and liabilities could have a substantial negative impact on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and are subject to extensive and complex U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. supra-national, national, provincial, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These environmental laws and regulations include those that govern the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the generation, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, occupational health and safety and those requiring permits, licenses, or other government approvals for specified operations or activities. Our products are also subject to a variety of international, national, regional, state, and provincial requirements and restrictions applicable to the manufacture, import, export or subsequent use of such products. In addition, we are required to maintain, and may be required to obtain in the future, environmental, health and safety permits, licenses, or government approvals to continue current operations at most of our manufacturing and research facilities throughout the world.

Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and maintenance of permits, can be costly and complex, and we have incurred and will continue to incur costs, including capital expenditures and costs associated with the issuance and maintenance of letters of credit, to comply with these requirements. In 2015, we incurred capital expenditures of approximately $25 million to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to make other environmental improvements. If we are unable to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or maintain our permits, we could incur substantial costs, including fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims or costs associated with upgrades to our facilities or changes in our manufacturing processes in order to achieve and maintain compliance, and may also be required to halt permitted activities or operations until any necessary permits can be obtained or complied with. In addition, future developments or increasingly stringent regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Actual and alleged environmental violations have been identified at our facility in Waterford, New York. We are cooperating with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the “NYSDEC”) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “USEPA”) and the U.S. Department of Justice in their respective investigations of that facility’s compliance with certain applicable environmental requirements, including certain requirements governing the operation of the facility’s hazardous waste incinerators. Although we currently believe that the costs and potential penalties associated with these investigations will not have a material adverse impact on our business, these investigations may result in administrative, civil or criminal enforcement by the State of New York and/or the United States and resolution of such enforcement actions will likely require payment of a monetary penalty and/or the imposition of other civil or criminal sanctions.

Environmental, health and safety requirements change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot predict what environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit requirements will be enacted or amended in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be interpreted or enforced or the impact of such laws, regulations or permits on future production expenditures, supply chain or sales. Our costs of compliance with current and future environmental, health and safety requirements could be material. Such future requirements include legislation designed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other substances associated with climate change (“greenhouse gases”). The European Union has enacted greenhouse gas emissions legislation, and continues to expand the scope of such legislation. The USEPA has promulgated regulations applicable to projects involving greenhouse gas emissions above a certain threshold, and the United States and certain states within the United States have enacted, or are considering, limitations on greenhouse gas emissions. These requirements to limit greenhouse gas emissions could significantly increase our energy costs, and may also require us to incur material capital costs to modify our manufacturing facilities.

In addition, we are subject to liability associated with hazardous substances in soil, groundwater and elsewhere at a number of sites. These include sites that we formerly owned or operated and sites where hazardous

15

Table of Contents

wastes and other substances from our current and former facilities and operations have been sent, treated, stored or disposed of, as well as sites that we currently own or operate. Depending upon the circumstances, our liability may be strict, joint and several, meaning that we may be held responsible for more than our proportionate share, or even all, of the liability involved regardless of our fault or whether we are aware of the conditions giving rise to the liability. Environmental conditions at these sites can lead to environmental cleanup liability and claims against us for personal injury or wrongful death, property damages and natural resource damages, as well as to claims and obligations for the investigation and cleanup of environmental conditions. The extent of any of these liabilities is difficult to predict, but in the aggregate such liabilities could be material.

We have been notified that we are or may be responsible for environmental remediation at certain sites in the United States. As the result of former, current or future operations, there may be additional environmental remediation or restoration liabilities or claims of personal injury by employees or members of the public due to exposure or alleged exposure to hazardous materials in connection with our operations, properties or products. Sites sold by us in past years may have significant site closure or remediation costs and our share, if any, may be unknown to us at this time. These environmental liabilities or obligations, or any that may arise or become known to us in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

In addition, in the normal course of our business, we are required to provide financial assurances for contingent future costs associated with certain hazardous waste management and remedial activities. Pursuant to financial assurance requirements set forth in state hazardous waste permit regulations applicable to our manufacturing facilities in Waterford, NY and Sistersville, WV, we have provided letters of credit in the following amounts: approximately $25 million for closure and post-closure care for the Waterford and the Sistersville facilities; and approximately $10 million (annual aggregate) for accidental occurrences at the Waterford and Sistersville facilities. A renewal of our Waterford facility’s hazardous waste permit expected to be issued by the NYSDEC in March 2016, which following the filing of our Form 10-K was so issued, requires approximately $26 million in financial assurances for our Waterford facility, an increase to the amount previously being provided of approximately $8 million. The renewal permit also requires a re-evaluation of the financial assurance amount within the next three years. One or more of our facilities may also in the future be subject to additional financial assurance requirements imposed by governmental authorities, including the USEPA. In this regard, the USEPA has identified chemical manufacturing as an industry for which it plans to develop, as necessary, proposed regulations identifying appropriate financial assurance requirements pursuant to §108(b) of CERCLA. Any increase in financial assurances required for our facilities in connection with environmental, health and safety laws or regulations or the maintenance of permits would likely increase our costs and could also materially impact our financial position. For example, to the extent we issue letters of credit under our ABL Facility to satisfy any financial assurance requirements, we would incur fees for the issuance and maintenance of these letters of credit and the amount of borrowings that would otherwise be available to us under such facility would be reduced.

Future chemical regulatory actions may decrease our profitability.

Several governmental entities have enacted, are considering or may consider in the future, regulations that may impact our ability to sell certain chemical products in certain geographic areas. In December 2006, the European Union enacted a regulation known as REACH. This regulation requires manufacturers, importers and consumers of certain chemicals manufactured in, or imported into, the European Union to register such chemicals and evaluate their potential impacts on human health and the environment. The implementing agency is currently in the process of determining if any chemicals should be further tested, regulated, restricted or banned from use in the European Union. Other countries have implemented, or are considering implementation of, similar chemical regulatory programs. When fully implemented, REACH and other similar regulatory programs may result in significant adverse market impacts on the affected chemical products. If we fail to comply with REACH or other similar laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

16

Table of Contents

We cannot at this time estimate the effect of these regulations on us or our financial condition, cash flows and profitability, but it could be material. The European Union is reviewing D4, as well as decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, or D5, another chemical substance we manufacture, and may, pursuant to REACH, regulate the manufacture, import and/or use of these two chemical substances in the European Union. The USEPA has also stated that they are reviewing the potential environmental risks posed by these two substances to determine whether regulatory measures are warranted, and we and other silicones industry members have entered into a consent order with the USEPA to conduct certain studies to obtain relevant data. Finally, the Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency has published a November 2011 study that identifies D4 and D5 as potential candidates for listing as persistent organic pollutants pursuant to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (the “Stockholm Convention”), an international treaty aimed at eliminating or minimizing the release of organic chemicals that are toxic, resistant to degradation in the environment, and transported and deposited far from the point of release. Regulation of our products containing such substances by the European Union, Canada, the United States, parties to the Stockholm Convention and/or other jurisdictions would likely reduce our sales within the jurisdiction and possibly in other geographic areas as well. These reductions in sales could be material depending upon the extent of any such additional regulations.

We participate with other companies in trade associations and regularly contribute to the research and study of the safety and environmental impact of our products and raw materials, including siloxanes. These programs are part of a program to review the environmental impacts, safety and efficacy of our products. In addition, government and academic institutions periodically conduct research on potential environmental and health concerns posed by various chemical substances, including substances we manufacture and sell. These research results are periodically reviewed by state, national and international regulatory agencies and potential customers. Such research could result in future regulations restricting the manufacture or use of our products, liability for adverse environmental or health effects linked to our products, and/or de-selection of our products for specific applications. These restrictions, liability, and product de-selection could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and/or liquidity.

Scientists periodically conduct studies on the potential human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Also, nongovernmental advocacy organizations and individuals periodically issue public statements alleging human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Based upon such studies or public statements, our customers may elect to discontinue the purchase and use of our products, even in the absence of any government regulation. Such actions could significantly decrease the demand for our products and, accordingly, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

We are subject to certain risks related to litigation filed by or against us, and adverse results may harm our business.

We cannot predict with certainty the cost of defense, of prosecution or of the ultimate outcome of litigation and other proceedings filed by or against us, including penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions, or remedies or damage awards, and adverse results in any litigation and other proceedings may materially harm our business. Litigation and other proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions relating to intellectual property, international trade, commercial arrangements, product liability, environmental, health and safety, joint venture agreements, labor and employment or other harms resulting from the actions of individuals or entities outside of our control. In the case of intellectual property litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes could include the cancellation, invalidation or other loss of material intellectual property rights used in our business and injunctions prohibiting our use of business processes or technology that are subject to third-party patents or other third-party intellectual property rights. Litigation based on environmental matters or exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace or based upon the use of our products could result in significant liability for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability.

17

Table of Contents

We remain subject to litigation relating to the Chapter 11 proceedings.

In connection with the Bankruptcy Cases, three appeals were filed relating to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. Specifically, on September 15, 2014, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) as trustee for the Subordinated Notes filed its appeal (the “U.S. Bank Appeal”) before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) seeking a reversal of the Court’s determination that the Debtors’ Plan of Reorganization properly denied recovery to holders of the Subordinated Notes on the basis that those debt securities are contractually subordinated to the Old Second Lien Notes. In addition, on September 16, 2014, BOKF, NA, as trustee for the Old First Lien Notes (“First Lien Indenture Trustee”) and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee for the Old Secured Notes (together with U.S. Bank and First Lien Indenture Trustee, the “Appellants”) filed their joint appeal (together with the U.S. Bank Appeal, the “District Court Appeals”) before the District Court seeking reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s determinations that (i) the Debtors were not required to compensate holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes for any prepayment premiums and (ii) the interest rates on the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes provided to holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes under the Plan of Reorganization was proper and in accordance with United States Bankruptcy Code. On November 11, 2014, the Debtors also filed a motion to dismiss the District Court Appeals (the “District Court Motion to Dismiss”) with the District Court asserting, inter alia, that granting the relief requested by the Appellants would be inequitable under the legal doctrine of equitable mootness. On May 5, 2015, the District Court dismissed the District Court Appeals (the “District Court Decision”) and affirmed the Bankruptcy Court Rulings. Because the District Court Appeals were decided on their merits, the District Court also terminated the District Court Motion to Dismiss as moot. All the Appellants appealed the District Court Decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit”, and the appeals, the “Second Circuit Appeals”). On September 3, 2015, the Debtors filed motions to dismiss the Second Circuit Appeals (the “Second Circuit Motions to Dismiss”) with the Second Circuit asserting, inter alia, that granting the relief requested by the Appellants would be inequitable under the legal doctrine of equitable mootness. On December 16, 2015, the Second Circuit denied the Second Circuit Motions to Dismiss but permitted the Debtors to raise issues of equitable mootness in their briefs on the merits of the Second Circuit Appeals. The merits briefing of the Second Circuit Appeals is currently ongoing. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of the Second Circuit Appeals. An adverse outcome could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition by reducing our liquidity and/or increasing our interest costs.

Because we manufacture and use materials that are known to be hazardous, we are subject to, or affected by, certain product and manufacturing regulations, for which compliance can be costly and time consuming. In addition, we may be subject to personal injury or product liability claims as a result of human exposure to such hazardous materials.

We produce hazardous chemicals that require care in handling and use that are subject to regulation by many U.S. and non-U.S. national, supra-national, state and local governmental authorities. In some circumstances, these authorities must review and, in some cases approve, our products and/or manufacturing processes and facilities before we may manufacture and sell some of these chemicals. To be able to manufacture and sell certain new chemical products, we may be required, among other things, to demonstrate to the relevant authority that the product does not pose an unreasonable risk during its intended uses and/or that we are capable of manufacturing the product in compliance with current regulations. The process of seeking any necessary approvals can be costly, time consuming and subject to unanticipated and significant delays. Approvals may not be granted to us on a timely basis, or at all. Any delay in obtaining, or any failure to obtain or maintain, these approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new products and to generate revenue from those products. New laws and regulations may be introduced in the future that could result in additional compliance costs, bans on product sales or use, seizures, confiscation, recall or monetary fines, any of which could prevent or inhibit the development, distribution or sale of our products and could increase our customers’ efforts to find less hazardous substitutes for our products. We are subject to ongoing reviews of our products and manufacturing processes.

18

Table of Contents

Products we have made or used could be the focus of legal claims based upon allegations of harm to human health. While we cannot predict the outcome of suits and claims, we believe that we maintain adequate reserves, in accordance with our policy, to address litigation and are adequately insured to cover foreseeable future claims. However, an unfavorable outcome in these litigation matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability and cause our reputation to decline.

We are subject to claims from our customers and their employees, environmental action groups and neighbors living near our production facilities.

We produce and use hazardous chemicals that require appropriate procedures and care to be used in handling them or in using them to manufacture other products. As a result of the hazardous nature of some of the products we produce and use, we may face claims relating to incidents that involve our customers’ improper handling, storage and use of our products. Additionally, we may face lawsuits alleging personal injury or property damage by neighbors living near our production facilities. These lawsuits could result in substantial damage awards against us, which in turn could encourage additional lawsuits and could cause us to incur significant legal fees to defend such lawsuits, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability. In addition, the activities of environmental action groups could result in litigation or damage to our reputation.

As a global business, we are subject to numerous risks associated with our international operations that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have significant manufacturing and other operations outside the United States. Some of these operations are in jurisdictions with unstable political or economic conditions. There are numerous inherent risks in international operations, including, but not limited to:

Our international operations expose us to different local political and business risks and challenges. For example, we face potential difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, and we have to design local solutions to manage credit risks of local customers and distributors. In addition, some of our operations are located in regions that may be politically unstable, having particular exposure to riots, civil commotion or civil unrests, acts of war (declared or undeclared) or armed hostilities or other national or international calamity. In some of these regions, our status as a U.S. company also exposes us to increased risk of sabotage, terrorist attacks, interference by civil or military authorities or to greater impact from the national and global military, diplomatic and financial response to any future attacks or other threats.

19

Table of Contents

Some of our operations are located in regions with particular exposure to natural disasters such as storms, floods, fires and earthquakes. It would be difficult or impossible for us to relocate these operations and, as a result, any of the aforementioned occurrences could materially adversely affect our business.

In addition, intellectual property rights may be more difficult to enforce in non-U.S. or non-Western Europe countries.

Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed under different economic, social and political conditions. We may fail to develop and implement policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to foreign currency risk.

In 2015, approximately 66% of our net sales originated outside the United States. In our consolidated financial statements, we translate our local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, at a constant level of business, our reported international revenues and earnings would be reduced because the local currency would translate into fewer U.S. dollars.

In addition to currency translation risks, we incur a currency transaction risk whenever one of our operating subsidiaries enters into a purchase or a sales transaction or indebtedness transaction using a different currency from the currency in which it records revenues. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks effectively, and volatility in currency exchange rates may materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our tax obligations. Since most of our indebtedness is denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could make it more difficult for us to repay our indebtedness.

We have entered and expect to continue to enter into various hedging and other programs in an effort to protect against adverse changes in the non-U.S. exchange markets and attempt to minimize potential material adverse effects. These hedging and other programs may be unsuccessful in protecting against these risks. Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if the U.S. dollar strengthens against non-U.S. currencies and our protective strategies are not successful. Likewise, a strengthening U.S. dollar provides opportunities to source raw materials more cheaply from foreign countries.

The European debt crisis and related European financial restructuring efforts have contributed to instability in global credit markets and may cause the value of the Euro to further deteriorate. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in Europe, the United States or other key markets remain uncertain or deteriorate further, the value of the Euro and the global credit markets may weaken. While we do not transact a significant amount of business in Greece, Italy or Spain, the general financial instability in those countries could have a contagion effect on the region and contribute to the general instability and uncertainty in the European Union. If this were to occur, it could adversely affect our European customers and suppliers and in turn have a materially adverse effect on our international business and results of operations.

Fluctuations in energy costs could have an adverse impact on our profitability and negatively affect our financial condition.

Oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated greatly over the past several years and we anticipate that they will continue to do so. Natural gas and electricity are essential to our manufacturing processes, which are energy-intensive. Our energy costs represented approximately 6% of our total cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2015, 7% for both the years ended 2014 and 2013, respectively.

20

Table of Contents

Our operating expenses will increase if our energy prices increase. Increased energy prices may also result in greater raw materials costs. If we cannot pass these costs through to our customers, our profitability may decline. In addition, increased energy costs may also negatively affect our customers and the demand for our products.

If our energy prices decrease, we expect benefits in the short-run with decreased operating expenses and increased operating income, but may face increased pricing pressure from competitors that are similarly impacted by energy prices and could see reduced demand for certain of our products that are sold to participants in the energy sector. As a result, profitability may decrease over an extended period of time of lower energy prices. Moreover, any future increases in energy prices after a period of lower energy prices may have an adverse impact on our profitability for the reasons described above.

We face increased competition from other companies and from substitute products, which could force us to lower our prices, which would adversely affect our profitability and financial condition.

The markets that we operate in are highly competitive, and this competition could harm our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Our competitors include major international producers as well as smaller regional competitors. We may be forced to lower our selling price based on our competitors’ pricing decisions, which would reduce our profitability. This has been further magnified by the impact of the recent global economic downturn, as companies have focused more on price to retain business and market share. In addition, we face competition from a number of products that are potential substitutes for our products. Growth in substitute products could adversely affect our market share, net sales and profit margins.

There is also a trend in our industries toward relocating manufacturing facilities to lower cost regions, such as Asia, which may permit some of our competitors to lower their costs and improve their competitive position. Furthermore, there has been an increase in new competitors based in these regions.

Some of our competitors are larger, have greater financial resources, have a lower cost structure, and/or have less debt than we do. As a result, those competitors may be better able to withstand a change in conditions within our industry and in the economy as a whole. If we do not compete successfully, our operating margins, financial condition, cash flows and profitability could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if we do not have adequate capital to invest in technology, including expenditures for research and development, our technology could be rendered uneconomical or obsolete, negatively affecting our ability to remain competitive.

We have achieved significant cost savings as a result of the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated or further amended, if we have material disputes with Hexion regarding its implementation or if we are unable to implement new initiatives under the amended agreement, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, and financial condition.

In October 2010, we entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion. Under this agreement, we provide to Hexion, and Hexion provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, legal and procurement services. We have realized significant cost savings under the Shared Services Agreement, including savings related to shared services and logistics optimization, best-of-source contractual terms, procurement savings, regional site rationalization, administrative and overhead savings. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by Hexion (or us), without cause, on not less than thirty days prior written notice, and expires in October 2016 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter, absent contrary notice from either party). In conjunction with the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization and our emergence from Chapter 11, on October 24, 2014, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one

21

Table of Contents

successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Shared Services Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated, or if the parties to the amended agreement have material disagreements with its implementation it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations and financial condition, as we would need to replace the services no longer being provided by Hexion, and would lose a portion of the benefits being generated under the agreement at the time.

We expect additional cost savings from our other strategic initiatives, and if we are unable to achieve these cost savings, or sustain our current cost structure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.

We have not yet realized all of the cost savings and synergies we expect to achieve from our other strategic initiatives. A variety of risks could cause us not to realize the expected cost savings and synergies, including but not limited to, higher than expected severance costs related to staff reductions; higher than expected retention costs for employees that will be retained; higher than expected stand-alone overhead expenses; delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost-saving plan; and other unexpected costs associated with operating our business.

If we are unable to achieve these cost savings or synergies it could adversely affect our profitability and financial condition. In addition, while we have been successful in reducing costs and generating savings, factors may arise that may not allow us to sustain our current cost structure. As market and economic conditions change, we may also make changes to our operating cost structure.

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, and our inability to enforce these rights could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position.

We rely on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade-secret laws of the United States and the countries where we do business to protect our intellectual property rights. We may be unable to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property without our authorization. The unauthorized use of our intellectual property could reduce any competitive advantage we have developed, reduce our market share or otherwise harm our business. In the event of unauthorized use of our intellectual property, litigation to protect or enforce our rights could be costly, and we may not prevail.

Many of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application, and our issued and pending U.S. and non-U.S. patents may not provide us with any competitive advantage and could be challenged by third parties. Our inability to secure issuance of our pending patent applications may limit our ability to protect the intellectual property rights these pending patent applications were intended to cover. Our competitors may attempt to design around our patents to avoid liability for infringement and, if successful, our competitors could adversely affect our market share. Furthermore, the expiration of our patents may lead to increased competition.

Our pending trademark applications may not be approved by the responsible governmental authorities and, even if these trademark applications are granted, third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these trademark applications. A failure to obtain trademark registrations in the United States and in other countries could limit our ability to protect our products and their associated trademarks and impede our marketing efforts in those jurisdictions.

In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. In some countries we do not apply for patent, trademark or copyright protection. We also rely on unpatented proprietary manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, these confidentiality agreements are limited in duration and could be breached, and may not provide meaningful protection of our

22

Table of Contents

trade secrets or proprietary manufacturing expertise. Adequate remedies may not be available if there is an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets and manufacturing expertise. In addition, others may obtain knowledge about our trade secrets through independent development or by legal means. The failure to protect our processes, apparatuses, technology, trade secrets and proprietary manufacturing expertise, methods and compounds could have a material adverse effect on our business by jeopardizing critical intellectual property.

Where a product formulation or process is kept as a trade secret, third parties may independently develop or invent and patent products or processes identical to our trade-secret products or processes. This could have an adverse impact on our ability to make and sell products or use such processes and could potentially result in costly litigation in which we might not prevail.

We could face intellectual property infringement claims that could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our production processes and products are specialized; however, we could face intellectual property infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary technology. If we were subject to an infringement suit, we may be required to change our processes or products, or stop using certain technologies or producing the infringing product entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could cause our customers to seek other products that are not subject to infringement suits. Any infringement suit could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements with our works councils and labor unions as they expire from time to time, if disputes with our works councils or unions arise, or if our unionized or represented employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

As of December 31, 2015, approximately 44% of our employees were unionized or represented by works councils that were covered by collective bargaining agreements. In addition, some of our employees reside in countries in which employment laws provide greater bargaining or other employee rights than the laws of the United States. These rights may require us to expend more time and money altering or amending employees’ terms of employment or making staff reductions. For example, most of our employees in Europe are represented by works councils, which generally must approve changes in conditions of employment, including restructuring initiatives and changes in salaries and benefits. A significant dispute could divert our management’s attention and otherwise hinder our ability to conduct our business or to achieve planned cost savings.

We may be unable to timely extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements as they expire. For example, a majority of our manufacturing personnel at our Sistersville, West Virginia site, and our Waterford, New York and Willoughby, Ohio sites are covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire in the summer of 2017 and the summer of 2016, respectively. We also may be subject to strikes or work stoppages by, or disputes with, our labor unions in connection with these collective bargaining agreements or otherwise. In January 2011, the union at our Waterford, New York facility representing approximately 780 employees went on strike for two days in response to grievances. In addition, in January and November 2009, this union filed a variety of unfair labor practice charges against us with the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) arising from our implementation of a new wage rate schedule, a new job classification structure and a new overtime procedure at our Waterford, New York facility. In January 2010, the NLRB filed a complaint against us relating to a portion of these charges, and in July 2010 we reached a settlement with respect to these claims and the complaint was withdrawn. If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements, if additional disputes with our works councils or unions arise or if our unionized or represented workers engage in a further strike or other work stoppage, we could incur higher labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

23

Table of Contents

Our pension plans are unfunded or under-funded and our required cash contributions could be higher than we expect, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

We sponsor various pension and similar benefit plans worldwide.

Our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans were under-funded in the aggregate by $102 million and $150 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2015. We are legally required to make contributions to our pension plans in the future, and those contributions could be material.

Our future funding obligations for our employee benefit plans depend upon the levels of benefits provided for by the plans, the future performance of assets set aside for these plans, the rates of interest used to determine funding levels, the impact of potential business dispositions, actuarial data and experience, and any changes in government laws and regulations. In addition, certain of our funded employee benefit plans hold a significant amount of equity securities. If the market values of these securities decline, our pension expense and funding requirements would increase and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If the performance of assets in the funded plans does not meet our expectations, our cash contributions for these plans could be higher than we expect, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

Natural or other disasters have, and could in the future disrupt our business and result in loss of revenue or higher expenses.

Any serious disruption at any of our facilities or our suppliers’ facilities due to hurricane, fire, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack or any other natural or man-made disaster could impair our ability to use our facilities and have a material adverse impact on our revenues and increase our costs and expenses. If there is a natural disaster or other serious disruption at any of our facilities or our suppliers’ facilities, it could impair our ability to adequately supply our customers and negatively impact our operating results.

For example, our manufacturing facility in Ohta, Japan and the manufacturing facilities of certain of our suppliers were impacted by the effects of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan on March 11, 2011 and related events. Our Ohta facility is one of three facilities globally where we internally produce siloxane, a key intermediate required in our manufacturing process of silicones. We also produce a variety of finished silicone products at this plant, including highly specialized silicone products. We are currently able to shift only certain amounts of production to our other facilities throughout the world over the short term. Our Ohta plant, which is approximately 230 kilometers away from the nuclear power plant at Fukushima, Japan that incurred significant damage as a result of the earthquake, is our closest facility to the area affected by the earthquake and tsunami. We also have manufacturing and research facilities in Kozuki and Kobe, Japan that produce quartz products, and administration offices in Tokyo, Nagoya and Fukuoka, Japan, none of which were significantly impacted by the earthquake. In addition, our manufacturing facilities, primarily those located in the Asia Pacific region, purchase certain raw materials from suppliers throughout Japan. Normal plant operations at our Ohta facility were restored in early May 2011 but uncertainty in Japan continues primarily with respect to the country’s energy infrastructure. To the extent further events or actions in Japan occur that impact its energy supply, including, but not limited to, rolling blackouts, restrictions on power usage, radiation exposure from nuclear power plants or the imposition of evacuation zones around such plants, it could materially and adversely affect our operations, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, many of our current and potential customers are concentrated in specific geographic areas. A disaster in one of these regions could have a material adverse impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition. Our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from a disaster, in which case our unreimbursed losses could be substantial.

24

Table of Contents

Acquisitions and joint ventures that we pursue may present unforeseen integration obstacles and costs, increase our leverage and negatively impact our performance. Divestitures that we pursue also may present unforeseen obstacles and costs.

We have made acquisitions of related businesses, and entered into joint ventures in the past and we may do so in the future. Acquisitions may require us to assume or incur additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage and complex debt structures. If such acquisitions are consummated, the risk factors we describe above and below, and for our business generally, may be intensified.

Our ability to implement our growth strategy is limited by covenants in our ABL Facility, indentures and other indebtedness, our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity, and our ability to integrate or identify appropriate acquisition and joint venture candidates.

The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions of related businesses, or our failure to integrate such businesses successfully into our existing businesses, could result in our incurring unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to realize any anticipated benefits from acquisitions or joint ventures. The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations.

In addition we may pursue divestitures of certain of our businesses as one element of our portfolio optimization strategy. Divestitures may require us to separate integrated assets and personnel from our retained businesses and devote our resources to transitioning assets and services to purchasers, resulting in disruptions to our ongoing business and distraction of management.

Security breaches and other disruptions to our information technology infrastructure could interfere with our operations, and could compromise our information and the information of our customers and suppliers, exposing us to liability which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

In the ordinary course of business, we rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including supply chain, manufacturing, distribution, invoicing, and collection of payments from customers. We use information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Additionally, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the propriety business information of our customers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our business operations and strategy. Despite security measures and business continuity plans, our information technology networks and infrastructure may be vulnerable to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to attacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

25

Table of Contents

Limitations on our use of certain product-identifying information, including the GE name and monogram, could adversely affect our business and profitability.

Prior to December 2006, substantially all of our products and services were marketed using the GE brand name and monogram, and we believe the association with GE provided our products and services with preferred status among our customers and employees due to GE’s globally recognized brands and perceived high quality. We and GE are parties to a trademark license agreement, which was entered into in December 2006 and amended in May 2013, that grants us a limited right to, among other things, use the GE mark and monogram on our sealant, adhesive and certain other products. These rights extend for a term of five years through December 3, 2018, with options that allow us to renew the license through 2023, subject to certain terms and conditions, including the payment of royalties. We also have the right to use numerous product specifications that contain the letters “GE” for the life of the respective products. While we continue to use the GE mark and monogram on these products and continue to use these product specifications, we are not able to use the GE mark and monogram on other products, use GE as part of our name or advertise ourselves as a GE company. While we have not yet experienced any significant loss of business as a result of our limited use of the GE mark and monogram, our business could be disadvantaged in the future by the loss of association with the GE name on our sealant, adhesive and certain other products.

Our financial condition or results of operations will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements.

Since October 24, 2014, we have been operating under a new capital structure. In addition, as required by fresh-start accounting, at October 24, 2014 our assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which are significantly different than amounts in our historical financial statements. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Effective Date will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our consolidated debt service payments.

We have substantial consolidated indebtedness. As of December 31, 2015, we had $1,205 million of consolidated outstanding indebtedness. Our projected annualized cash interest expense is approximately $57 million based on our consolidated indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding and interest rates at December 31, 2015 without giving effect to any subsequent borrowings under our ABL Facility, substantially all of which represents cash interest expense on fixed-rate obligations.

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to make scheduled debt service payments depends on a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. Continued or increased weakness in economic conditions and our performance beyond our expectations would exacerbate these risks. Our business may generate insufficient cash flows from operations to meet our debt service and other obligations, and currently anticipated cost savings, capital investment plans, working capital reductions and operating improvements may not be realized on schedule, or at all. To the extent our cash flow from operations is insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, aside from our current liquidity, we would be dependent on outside capital to meet the funding of our debt service obligations and to fund capital expenditures and other obligations. We were previously forced to take actions to restructure and refinance our indebtedness and there can be no assurance we will be able to meet our scheduled debt service obligations in the future.

If we are unable to meet our expenses and debt service obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets or issue additional equity securities. We may be unable to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or issue equity securities on commercially reasonable terms, or at

26

Table of Contents

all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and result in the acceleration of our debt obligations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our outstanding debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Availability under the ABL Facility is subject to a borrowing base based on a specified percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and, in certain foreign jurisdictions, machinery and equipment. As of December 31, 2015, the borrowing base (including various reserves) was determined to be approximately $217 million, and we had approximately $53 million of drawn letters of credit and no revolver borrowings under the ABL Facility. The borrowing base (including various reserves) is updated on a monthly basis, so the actual borrowing base could be lower in the future. To the extent the borrowing base is lower than we expect, that could significantly impair our liquidity.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry.

Our substantial consolidated indebtedness and other commitments and obligations could have other important consequences, including but not limited to the following:

There would be a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, as needed.

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significant additional indebtedness. This could intensify the risks described above and below.

We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the terms governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to numerous qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness we may incur in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Increasing our indebtedness could intensify the risks described above and below.

The terms governing our outstanding debt, including restrictive covenants, may adversely affect our operations.

The terms governing our outstanding debt contain, and any future indebtedness we incur would likely contain, numerous restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on our ability to, among other things:

27

Table of Contents

As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs.

If the availability under the ABL Facility falls below certain thresholds, we will be subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. If we are unable to maintain compliance with such ratio or other covenants in the ABL Facility, an event of default could result.

The credit agreement governing the ABL Facility requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 at any time when the availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured on a last twelve months, or LTM, basis.

A breach of our fixed charge coverage ratio, if in effect, could, if not waived, result in an event of default under our ABL Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility, our direct parent company will have the right, but not the obligation, to cure such default through the purchase of additional equity in up to three of any four consecutive quarters. If a breach of a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant is not cured or waived, or if any other event of default under the ABL Facility occurs, the lenders under such credit facility:

any or all of which could result in an event of default under our notes.

The ABL Facility also provides for “springing control” over the cash in our deposit accounts constituting collateral for the ABL Facility, and such cash management arrangements include a cash sweep at any time that availability under the ABL Facility is less than the greater of (1) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (2) $27 million. Such cash sweep, if in effect, will cause all our available cash to be applied to outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. If we satisfy the conditions to borrowing under the ABL Facility while any such cash sweep is in effect, we may be able to make additional borrowings under the ABL Facility to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs. If we do not satisfy the conditions to borrowing, we will not be permitted to make additional borrowings under the ABL Facility, and we will not have sufficient cash to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs. The availability threshold for triggering a cash sweep is the same availability threshold for triggering the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under the ABL Facility.

28

Table of Contents

The terms governing our indebtedness limit our ability to sell assets and also restrict the use of proceeds from that sale. We may be unable to sell assets quickly enough or for sufficient amounts to enable us to meet our obligations. Furthermore, a substantial portion of our assets is, and may continue to be, intangible assets. Therefore, it may be difficult for us to pay our consolidated debt obligations in the event of an acceleration of any of our consolidated indebtedness.

If the indebtedness under the ABL Facility or our existing notes were to be accelerated after an event of default, our respective assets may be insufficient to repay such indebtedness in full and our lenders could foreclose on the assets pledged under the applicable facility, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Repayment of our debt, including required principal and interest payments, depends on cash flows generated by our subsidiaries, which may be subject to limitations beyond our control.

Our subsidiaries own a significant portion of our consolidated assets and conduct a significant portion of our consolidated operations. Repayment of our indebtedness depends, to a significant extent, on the generation of cash flows and the ability of our subsidiaries to make cash available to us by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments on our indebtedness. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from subsidiaries. While there are limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to incur consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make intercompany payments, these limitations are subject to certain qualifications and exceptions. In the event that we are unable to receive distributions from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness.

A downgrade in our debt ratings could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings or trade credit.

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) maintain credit ratings on us and certain of our debt. Subsequent to the Emergence our ratings were downgraded by Moody’s in January 2016. The ratings assigned by both ratings agencies to our debt issued in connection with the Emergence are currently below investment grade. Any decision by these ratings agencies to further downgrade such ratings or put them on negative watch in the future could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings and trade credit extended by our suppliers of raw materials or other vendors.

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock

There is a very limited trading market for our common stock.

There are substantial risks in investing in our common stock given the general illiquid nature of such securities. There is a very limited public trading market for our securities. Our common stock has been quoted on the OTCQX since March 7, 2016 under the symbol “MPMQ”. Trading prices and volumes on the OTCQX are generally thin and erratic. Holders of our securities may find it difficult or impossible to find a qualified purchaser for such securities at any price. Because of this, it is hard to determine exactly the value of our common stock.

We cannot assure you that our common stock will continue to be quoted on the OTCQX or that an orderly trading market will be maintained for our common stock.

29

Table of Contents

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the offering price.

The price for our common stock may be volatile and may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including, among others:

These and other factors may lower the price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the event of a drop in the price of our common stock, you could lose a substantial part or all of your investment in our common stock.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.

Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that these sales may occur, may depress the price of our common stock.

Additional sales of a substantial number of our shares of common stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional shares. As of December 31, 2015, we had 48,028,594 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of these shares, 36,754,769 shares have been registered by the Company’s registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The selling stockholders beneficially own a significant amount of our common stock. The sale of all or a portion of the shares by the selling stockholders or our other stockholders, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to decrease significantly.

Pursuant to the Company’s Registration Rights Agreement, the selling stockholders have certain demand and piggyback rights that may require us to file additional registration statements registering their common stock or to include sales of such common stock in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. Any shares of common stock sold under these registration statements or this prospectus will be freely tradable. In the event such registration rights are exercised and a large number of shares of common stock is sold, such sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital. Additionally, we will bear all expenses in connection with this registration and any such registrations, except that the selling stockholders may be responsible for their pro rata shares of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, stock transfer taxes and certain legal expenses.

30

Table of Contents

As a holding company, our only material assets will be our equity interests in our operating subsidiaries, and our principal source of revenue and cash flow will be distributions from such subsidiaries, which may be limited by law and/or contract in making such distributions.

As a holding company, our principal source of revenue and cash flow will be distributions from our subsidiaries. Therefore, our ability to carry out our business plan, to fund and conduct our business, service our debt and pay dividends (if any) in the future will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient net income and cash flows to make upstream cash distributions to us. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities, and although they may be wholly owned or controlled by us, they have no obligation to make any funds available to us, whether in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to distribute cash to us may also be subject to, among other things, future restrictions that are contained in our subsidiaries’ agreements (as entered into from time to time), availability of sufficient funds in such subsidiaries and applicable laws and regulatory restrictions. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries generally will have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and claims of our creditors and stockholders. To the extent the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute dividends or other payments to us could be limited in any way, this could materially limit our ability to fund and conduct our business, service our debt and pay dividends (if any).

Apollo is our largest stockholder and has significant influence over us, and its interests may conflict with or differ from your interests as a stockholder.

As of December 31, 2015, Apollo and its affiliates beneficially own approximately 39.8% of our common stock. In connection with the Emergence, Apollo designated four of our eleven directors. As a result of that representation, Apollo has the ability to exert significant influence over us.

The interests of Apollo could conflict with or differ from the interests of our other stockholders. For example, the concentration of ownership held by Apollo could delay, defer, cause or prevent a change of control of us or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination that you as a stockholder may otherwise view favorably. Apollo is in the business of making or advising on investments in companies and holds, and may from time to time in the future acquire, interests in or provide advice to businesses that directly or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are suppliers or customers of ours. Apollo may also pursue acquisitions that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) provides that we expressly renounce any interest or expectancy in any business opportunity, transaction or other matter in which Apollo, the Ad Hoc Group (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation) or any of their respective affiliates (with respect to Apollo, the “Apollo Group”) participates or desires or seeks to participate in, even if the opportunity is one that we would reasonably be deemed to have pursued if given the opportunity to do so.

Provisions in our organizational documents may delay or prevent our acquisition by a third party.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws (“Bylaws”) contain several provisions that may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock. These provisions include, among others:

31

Table of Contents

These provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could discourage potential takeover attempts and reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for our common stock in the future, which could reduce the market price of our common stock. For more information, see “Description of Capital Stock.”

32

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believe,” “project,” “might,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seek,” “approximately,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” or “anticipate” or similar expressions that concern our strategy, plans or intentions. All statements we make in this prospectus relating to our estimated and projected revenue, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates, financial results, and prospects are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those we expect. We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which we base upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results.

We disclose important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, including, without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus. Some of the factors that we believe could affect our revenue, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates, financial results, business, condition and prospects include:

33

Table of Contents

We caution you that the foregoing list of important factors may not contain all of the material factors that are important to you. There may be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements. In addition, in light of these risks and uncertainties, the matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus may not in fact occur. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock that may be sold from time to time pursuant to this prospectus. The selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock offered from time to time under this prospectus. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling stockholders incurred in connection with the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions.

MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND POLICY

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX under the symbol “MPMQ”. The following table sets forth the high and low bid quotations for our common stock for the period indicated below, as reported by the OTCQX for such period. Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions in our common stock.

Holders. As of February 15, 2016, there were 110 stockholders of record of our common stock, one of which was Cede & Co., a nominee for The Depository Trust Company. All of our common stock held by brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions as nominees for beneficial owners are considered to be held of record by Cede & Co., who is considered to be one stockholder of record. A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares of common stock are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. Because such shares of common stock are held on behalf of stockholders, and not by the stockholders directly, and because a stockholder can have multiple positions with different brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions, we are unable to determine the total number of stockholders we have.

Dividends and Dividend Policy. Momentive has not paid any dividends since Momentive’s incorporation in 2014. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law and will be dependent upon then-existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant.

OFFERING PRICE

All the common stock being offered hereby will be offered or sold from time to time directly by the selling stockholders or alternatively through underwriters, broker dealers or agents. The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at prevailing market prices at the time of sale or privately negotiated prices.

34

Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of December 31, 2015. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling stockholders incurred in connection with the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions. The selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock offered from time to time under this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus.

You should read the information set forth below in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

35

Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table presents the Company’s summary historical financial information as of and for the periods presented. Prior to the Emergence Date, Momentive had not conducted any business operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted or suggested by context, all financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes, as of and prior to the Emergence Date, as contained in this prospectus, reflect the actual historical consolidated results of operations and financial condition of MPM for the periods presented and do not give effect to the Plan of Reorganization or any of the transactions contemplated thereby or the adoption of “fresh-start” accounting.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date, we adopted fresh start accounting, which resulted in the creation of a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, as well as the effects of the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization, the consolidated financial statements on and after October 24, 2014 are not comparable with the consolidated financial statements prior to that date. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

The selected historical financial information as of December 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (successor) and for the successor year ended December 31, 2015; the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The financial data as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.

36

Table of Contents

You should read the following selected historical financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.

37

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles adjusted working capital to working capital:

38

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the year ended December 31, 2015; the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs, and which involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements.”

Overview and Outlook

MPM Holdings Inc. (“Momentive”), a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”), is one of the world’s largest producers of silicones, silicone derivatives and organofunctional silanes and a global leader in the development and manufacture of products derived from quartz and specialty ceramics. Silicones are a multi-functional family of materials used in a wide variety of products and serve as a critical ingredient in many construction, transportation, healthcare, personal care, electronic, consumer and agricultural uses. Silicones and silanes are generally used as additives to a wide variety of end products in order to provide or enhance certain of their attributes, such as resistance (heat, ultraviolet light and chemical), lubrication, adhesion or viscosity. Some of the most well-known end-use product applications include bath and shower caulk, pressure-sensitive adhesive labels, polyurethane foam products, cosmetics and tires. Due to the versatility and high-performance characteristics of silicones and silanes, they are increasingly being used as a substitute for other materials. Our Quartz business manufactures quartz, specialty ceramics and crystal products for use in a number of high-technology industries, which typically require products made to precise specifications. The cost of our products typically represents a small percentage of the overall cost of our customers’ products.

We serve more than 4,000 customers between our Silicones and Quartz businesses in over 100 countries. Our customers include leading companies in their respective industries, such as Procter & Gamble, Avery, Continental Tire, Saint Gobain, Unilever, BASF, SABIC, The Home Depot, and Lowe’s.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and Emergence

On April 13, 2014, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Court. The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re MPM Silicones, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-22503. During the bankruptcy proceedings, we continued to operate our business as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Court until MPM’s emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).

On September 11, 2014, the Court confirmed the Plan of Reorganization, and on the Effective Date the Plan of Reorganization became effective and MPM emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings. Upon emergence, we reduced our total aggregate debt obligations from approximately $3.2 billion at December 31, 2013 to approximately $1.2 billion at December 31, 2014, and reduced our annual cash interest payments from nearly $300 million to approximately $58 million. As of December 31, 2015, we had $2,663 million of total assets, $2,037 million of total liabilities, and $626 million of total equity.

Reportable Segments

Our business segments are based on the products that we offer and the markets that we serve. At December 31, 2015, we had two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz.

39

Table of Contents

The Company’s organizational structure continues to evolve. We are also continuing to refine our business and operating structure to better align our services to our customers and improve our cost position, while continuing to invest in global growth opportunities.

2015 Overview

2016 Outlook

As we look into 2016, we expect continued growth in demand in our specialty silicones businesses, particularly as we continue our investment in developing new products to support future growth. However, we expect continued softness in semiconductor capital equipment and specialty solar demand and further delay in recovery in these markets to adversely affect volumes in our Quartz business in 2016. Looking ahead, we expect that economic volatility will continue into the first quarter of 2016. We anticipate that our first quarter volumes and revenues will be similar to what we experienced in the second half of 2015 and will be affected further by the inventory reduction efforts in the fourth quarter of 2015. We anticipate growth will resume in subsequent quarters and remain well positioned when end markets recover. We anticipate growth will resume in subsequent quarters. As a result, we will be well positioned to leverage our leadership positions, optimize our portfolio and invest in and drive new growth programs. Our business is impacted by general economic and industrial conditions, including general industrial production, automotive builds, housing starts, construction activity, consumer spending and semiconductor capital equipment investment and these factors could have negative effects to our liquidity. Our business has both geographic and end market diversity which often reduces the impact of any one of these factors on our overall performance.

We are continuing to invest in growth opportunities in our higher-growth product lines and geographical regions, and will leverage the combination of our proprietary technologies, strategic investments in key assets and leading presence in high-growth end markets to benefit as the global economy recovers and for long-term success. We are also focused on gaining productivity efficiencies to reduce material costs and improve margins through investments in reliable and stable operations. We continue to evaluate additional actions, as well as productivity measures, that could lead to further savings. Such actions could result in more significant restructuring, exit and disposal costs and asset impairments in the future.

40

Table of Contents

During the fourth quarter of 2015, we announced a global restructuring to reduce our structural costs and now expect the program to improve our results by $30 million, or an increase of $5 million compared to the original target from November of 2015. We expect to realize $25 million in savings in 2016 and to incur costs of approximately $15 million primarily for severance associated with our cost savings program. The targeted savings will still be achieved primarily through a reduction in force and delayering of our organization primarily in selling, general and administrative roles, as well as productivity actions at our operating facilities.

At the same time, we are taking strategic actions to address its global siloxane manufacturing capacity. As an initial step, we are transforming our Leverkusen, Germany facility by rationalizing siloxane capacity and making further investments in specialty assets through the NXT Silanes expansion. We expect that this siloxane rationalization in Europe will reduce operating costs by approximately $10 million per year when completed. We also recently announced the strategic expansion of our Leverkusen, Germany facility as part of our global initiative to expand production capabilities serving the automotive markets. Our innovative NXT silane technology helps global tire producers reduce rolling resistance without the loss of wet traction. We will invest approximately $30 million to expand our flagship NXT silane manufacturing capacity at the Leverkusen site, which is strategically located in near proximity to multiple key customers.

Shared Services Agreement

In October 2010, we entered into a shared services agreement with Hexion (the “Shared Services Agreement”), pursuant to which we provide to Hexion, and Hexion provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement was renewed for one year starting in October 2015 and is subject to termination by either us or Hexion, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2016 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between us and Hexion and requires that the Steering Committee formed under the agreement meet no less than annually to evaluate and determine an equitable allocation percentage. The allocation percentage is reviewed by the Steering Committee pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement.

The Shared Services Agreement has resulted in significant synergies for us, including shared services and logistics optimization, procurement savings, regional site rationalization and administrative and overhead savings. Despite the Bankruptcy Filing, the Shared Services Agreement has continued in effect along with the majority of the savings from these synergies. In conjunction with our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, on October 24, 2014, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations.

Matters Impacting Comparability of Results

Fresh Start Accounting

Momentive became the indirect parent company of MPM in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization upon MPM’s emergence from Chapter 11 on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, at the Effective Date, our assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values which, in some cases, are significantly different than amounts included in our financial statements prior to the Effective Date. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations on and after the Effective Date are not comparable to our financial condition and results of operations prior to the Effective Date.

41

Table of Contents

During the application of fresh start accounting, we re-evaluated our accounting policy with respect to which overhead costs were production-related, as well as the extent to which functional costs supported production-related activities. As a result, certain costs were recorded in cost of sales rather than selling, general and administrative expense in the successor period.

Other Comprehensive Loss

Our other comprehensive income is significantly impacted by foreign currency translation. The impact of foreign currency translation is driven by the translation of assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries which are denominated in functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The primary assets and liabilities driving the adjustments are cash and cash equivalents; accounts receivable; inventory; property, plant and equipment; goodwill and other intangible assets; accounts payable and pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The primary currencies in which these assets and liabilities are denominated are the euro and Japanese yen. Prior to October 24, 2014, other comprehensive income included the impact of defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments. Upon the application of fresh start accounting, beginning on and after October 24, 2014, actuarial gains and losses resulting from pension and postretirement liability remeasurement are recognized immediately in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, compared to our prior policy of deferring such gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortizing them over future periods. The impact of defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments prior to October 24, 2014 were primarily driven by unrecognized actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans, as well as the subsequent amortization of gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive income in periods following the initial recording of such items. These actuarial gains and losses were determined using various assumptions, the most significant of which were (i) the weighted average rate used for discounting the liability, (ii) the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, (iii) the weighted average rate of future salary increases and (iv) the anticipated mortality rate tables.

Raw Materials

In 2015, we purchased approximately $1.0 billion of raw materials. The largest raw material used in our Silicones business is silicon metal. The cost of silicon metal comprised approximately 22% of our total raw material costs in our Silicones’ manufacturing processes in 2015. Raw materials continue to trend favorably for us and for silicon metal industry and we have continually worked to review our existing global supply agreements to seek more favorable terms and we expect to significantly benefit year on year from improved raw material pricing in 2016.

Based on current economic data, we expect 2016 to be relatively stable. The largest raw material used in our Quartz business is a specific type of sand, which is currently available from a limited number of suppliers. Because Unimin controls a significant amount of the quartz sand market, it exercises significant control over quartz sand prices, which have been steadily increasing. In April 2015, we entered into a purchase agreement with Unimin, which expires on December 31, 2016.

We expect long-term raw material cost fluctuations to continue because of price movements of key feedstocks. To help mitigate the fluctuations in raw material pricing, we have purchase and sale contracts and commercial arrangements with many of our vendors and customers that contain periodic price adjustment mechanisms. Due to differences in the timing of pricing mechanism trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact. In many cases this “lead-lag” impact can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices.

42

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales

In 2015, net sales decreased by $187 million, or 8%, compared to 2014. This decrease was primarily due to unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $156 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen during 2015 as compared to 2014, as well as negative price and mix shift, which negatively impacted net sales by $46 million caused by economic downturns in China, slowness in Asian high end automotive markets and a downturn in the oil and gas market. These decreases were partially offset by volume increases of $17 million.

In 2014, net sales increased by $78 million, or 3%, compared to 2013. Volume increases and price and mix shift positively impacted net sales by $94 million. Sales volumes were positively impacted by improved demand for our silicones products in the construction and automotive markets as a result of successful growth initiatives and economic improvement, primarily in Europe, and were partially offset by decreased demand in the specialty solar market, which negatively impacted our Quartz business. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically silanes, coatings and elastomers. These increases were partially

43

Table of Contents

offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $16 million, which were primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Operating Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the variance between the operating income for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2014:

In 2015, operating income increased $137 million from an operating loss of $126 million to an operating income of $11 million. Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization of $105 million and $14 million in the successor year ended December 31, 2015 and successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014, respectively due to the change in presentation of depreciation and amortization, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) decreased by $38 million compared to 2014. In conjunction with the application of fresh start accounting, we re-evaluated our accounting policy with respect to which overhead costs were production-related, as well as the extent to which functional costs supported production-related activities. As a result, in the Successor period, certain costs were recorded in cost of sales rather than in selling, general and administrative expense. In addition, in 2014, $35 million of non cash one-time costs related to fresh start accounting were recorded in cost of sales. Cost of sales was positively impacted by favorable exchange rate fluctuations of $115 million driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen and production mix of $13 million. This reduction in cost of sales was partially offset by higher net processing costs of $15 million.

Selling, general and administrative expense (excluding depreciation and amortization of $48 million and $8 million in the successor year ended December 31, 2015 and period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014, respectively, due to the presentation change discussed above) decreased by $269 million compared to 2014. As discussed above, in 2015, certain costs which previously had been recorded in selling, general and administrative expense are being recorded in cost of sales. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expense benefited from favorable exchange rate fluctuations of $25 million as discussed above and $31 million related to the remeasurement of our pension and other postretirement liabilities. Selling, general and administrative expense in 2014 included foreign currency losses of approximately $94 million related to certain intercompany arrangements for which we were unable to assert permanent reinvestment during the Predecessor period due to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern under our prior capital structure. Depreciation and amortization expense during 2015 was $153 million compared to $169 million in 2014. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2014 included $12 million of accelerated depreciation related to certain long-lived assets that were disposed of before the end of their estimated useful lives. Research and development expense for 2015 decreased by $11 million compared to 2014 primarily related to the timing of new projects. Restructuring and other costs for 2015 increased by $7 million compared to 2014 which was primarily due to severance benefits related to the global restructuring announced in November 2015.

44

Table of Contents

In 2014, operating income decreased $157 million, from an income of $31 million to a loss of $126 million, compared to 2013. Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization of $14 million in the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 due to the change in presentation of depreciation and amortization, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus) increased by $95 million compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in volumes and price and mix shift, which were primarily driven by the increase in net sales discussed above. Cost of sales was also negatively impacted by price inflation in certain key raw materials during 2014 which we were unable to absorb. These increases were partially offset by productivity improvements and favorable exchange rate fluctuations driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. Selling, general and administrative expense (excluding depreciation and amortization of $8 million due to the presentation change discussed above) increased by $133 million compared to 2013. The increase was driven by unrealized foreign currency losses of approximately $94 million related to certain intercompany arrangements for which we were unable to assert permanent reinvestment during the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 due to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern under our prior capital structure. The increase was also driven by unrealized losses of $15 million in 2014 related to the remeasurement of our pension liabilities which, subsequent to the Effective Date due to a change in accounting policy, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2014 was $169 million (including $22 million of depreciation and amortization expense included in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense, as discussed above) compared to $171 million in 2013. Research and development expense in 2014 increased $6 million compared to 2013, primarily related to timing of new projects. Restructuring and other costs increased by $4 million, which was primarily related to one-time charges for services and certain costs associated with restructuring our capital structure prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, and was partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement.

Non-Operating Expense (Gain)

In 2015, total non-operating expense increased by $1,867 million, from an income of $1,784 million to an expense of $83 million, compared to 2014. The increase was primarily driven by reorganization income items, net of $1,969 million in 2014 (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus). This increase was offset by a decrease in interest expense of $98 million, which was primarily due to a reduction in total debt outstanding as a result of restructuring our capital structure in conjunction with the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization.

In 2014, total non-operating expense decreased by $2,178 million, from an expense of $394 million to income of $1,784 million, compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by reorganization items, net of $1,969 million in 2014 (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for more information). The overall decrease was also driven by a decrease in interest expense of $177 million, which was primarily due to ceasing interest accruals on the Debtor’s unsecured debt beginning in April 2014 as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, as well as a reduction in total debt outstanding as a result of restructuring our capital structure in conjunction with the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization. These decreases were partially offset by other non-operating expense of $8 million in 2014, which primarily consisted of realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses.

Income Tax Expense

In 2015, income tax expense decreased by $23 million compared to 2014. The effective income tax rate was (18%) for 2015 compared to 2% for 2014. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the amount and distribution of income and loss among the various jurisdictions in which we operate. The effective tax rate was also impacted by the tax impact of the reorganization and fresh start accounting net of the movement in valuation allowance. The valuation allowance, which relates principally to U.S. and certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, was established and maintained based on our assessment that a portion of the deferred tax assets will likely not be realized.

45

Table of Contents

In 2014, income tax expense increased by $68 million compared to 2013. The effective income tax rate was 2% for 2014 compared to (29)% for 2013. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the amount and distribution of income and loss among the various jurisdictions in which we operate. The effective tax rate was also impacted by the tax impact of the reorganization and fresh start accounting net of the movement in valuation allowance, as well as the change in our permanent reinvestment assertion. The valuation allowance, which relates principally to U.S. and certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, was established and maintained based on our assessment that a portion of the deferred tax assets will likely not be realized.

For both 2015 and 2014, profits and losses incurred in foreign jurisdictions with statutory tax rates less than 35% (primarily Germany) comprised the largest portion of the foreign rate differential. Economic pressure and volatility within certain foreign jurisdictions, including Germany, Japan, and Switzerland, were largely responsible for the change in foreign rate differential from 2015 to 2014. Due in part to this economic volatility and the impact of certain business changes made as a result of our ability to continue as a going concern, the historically significant effective tax rate drivers discussed above may not be indicative of our future tax rate. The valuation allowance, which related principally to U.S. and certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, was established and maintained based on our assessment that a portion of the deferred tax assets would likely not be realized.

We are recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in our U.S. consolidated income tax return as of December 31, 2015 and are expecting that, with the exception of Germany and Japan, all earnings will be repatriated to the United States. We have accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings. In addition, we have certain intercompany arrangements that, if settled, may trigger taxable gains or losses based on foreign currency exchange rates in place at the time of settlement. As a result, are asserting permanent reinvestment with respect to certain intercompany arrangements considered indefinite.

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

For the year ended December 31, 2015, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $63 million, primarily due to the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. In 2015, pension and postretirement benefit negative impact on other comprehensive loss was $1 million compared to $69 million in 2014 due to the recognition of prior service costs in 2014 following provision changes to our U.S. pension plan.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $2 million, primarily due to the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. For the year ended December 31, 2014, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $70 million, primarily due to net unrecognized actuarial losses driven by a decrease in the discount rate at October 24, 2014, partially offset by favorable asset experience. In connection with the application of fresh start accounting, on October 24, 2014, total accumulated unrecognized net gains of $162 million were eliminated from accumulated other comprehensive income (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information).

For the year ended December 31, 2013, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $6 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese yen, partially offset by the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2013, a tax benefit of $54 million was recognized in other comprehensive income related to a change in assertion with respect to certain intercompany arrangements, which were previously considered indefinite. For the year ended December 31, 2013, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments positively impacted other comprehensive income by $28 million, primarily due to unrecognized actuarial gains driven by an increase in the discount rate at December 31, 2013, favorable asset experience and the amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses recorded in prior periods.

46

Table of Contents

Results of Operations by Segment

Following are net sales and Segment EBITDA by reportable segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) adjusted for certain non-cash items and certain other income and expenses. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by our senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the Board of Directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also a principle profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Segment EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income (loss) or other results reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

In 2015, we redefined our internal reporting structure and now allocate additional administrative functional costs to the operating segments. The current presentation of Segment EBITDA includes a Corporate component rather than the Other component previously disclosed. Corporate is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the segments, such as certain shared service and administrative functions. Segment EBITDA for all periods presented was retrospectively revised to conform with the current presentation.

2015 vs. 2014 Segment Results

Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by segment from 2014 to 2015:

Silicones

Net sales in 2015 decreased $185 million, or 8%, compared to 2014. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $147 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen, as well as adverse price and mix shift of $46 million due to economic downturns in China, slowness in Asian high end automotive markets and a downturn in the oil and gas market. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in sales volume.

Segment EBITDA in 2015 decreased by $56 million to $201 million compared to 2014. The decrease was primarily due to net unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations, negative price and mix shift and higher net

47

Table of Contents

processing costs. The decrease was partially offset by reductions in selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses.

Quartz

Net sales in 2015 decreased $2 million, or 1%, compared to 2014. The decrease was primarily due to net unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $9 million, partially offset by an increase in sales volume of $7 million.

Segment EBITDA in 2015 increased by $4 million to $27 million compared to 2014. The increase was primarily due to a settlement gain related to the resolution of a customer dispute in the first quarter of 2015, increase in sales volume and reductions in selling, general and administrative expenses partially offset by higher net processing costs.

Corporate

Corporate charges are primarily general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the segments, such as shared service and administrative functions. Corporate charges decreased by $9 million to $34 million compared to 2014, primarily due to net favorable exchange rate fluctuations and lower administrative costs to serve.

2014 vs. 2013 Segment Results

Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by segment from 2013 to 2014:

Silicones

Net sales in 2014 increased $100 million, or 5%, compared to 2013. Volume increases and price and mix shift positively impacted net sales by $61 million and $55 million, respectively. Sales volumes were positively impacted by improved demand for our silicones products in the construction and automotive markets as a result of successful growth initiatives and economic improvement, primarily in Europe. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically silanes, coatings and elastomers. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $16 million, which were primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Segment EBITDA in 2014 increased by $16 million to $257 million compared to 2013. The increase was due to the increase in net sales discussed above, and was partially offset by raw material inflation, disruptions in plant operations and incremental transportation costs due to adverse weather conditions in early 2014, as well as the negative impact on our business resulting from the Chapter 11 proceedings.

Quartz

Net sales in 2014 decreased $22 million, or 11%, compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in volumes, which were primarily due to decreased demand in the specialty solar market. Price and mix and exchange rate fluctuations were flat compared to 2013.

Segment EBITDA in 2014 decreased by $12 million to $23 million compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in net sales discussed above, as well as decreased productivity in processing costs, and was partially offset by cost control and other operational efficiencies.

48

Table of Contents

Corporate

Corporate charges increased by $4 million to $42 million compared to 2013, primarily due to higher compensation costs and costs to support initiatives in our information technology, human resources and environmental, health and safety functions.

Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Net (Loss) Income:

Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA

Not included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash and other income and expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these charges primarily represented net realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses and losses on the disposal of certain assets. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these charges also included losses on the disposal of certain assets. For the year ended December 31, 2013, these amounts primarily represented net unrealized derivative and foreign exchange losses, stock-based compensation and gains and losses from the disposal of certain assets.

Unrealized gains (losses) on pension and postretirement benefits represented non-cash actuarial gains (losses) recognized upon the remeasurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations, which after the Effective Date, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and were driven by a decrease in discount rates, other demographic assumptions and asset performance. Restructuring and other costs for all periods primarily included expenses from our restructuring and cost optimization programs. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with

49

Table of Contents

restructuring the Company’s capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, and were partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement. Reorganization items, net represented incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing. For the successor year ended December 31, 2015, successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31 2014, these amounts were primarily related to certain professional fees. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these amounts included certain professional fees, the $30 million premium to the Backstop Commitment Agreement (the “BCA Commitment Premium”) and financing fees related to our debtor-in-possession credit facilities (the “DIP Facilities”), as well as the impact of the Reorganization Adjustments and the Fresh Start Adjustments (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operations and funds available under the ABL Facility. Our primary continuing liquidity needs are to finance our working capital, debt service and capital expenditures.

At December 31, 2015, we had $1,205 million of indebtedness. In addition, at December 31, 2015, we had $434 million in liquidity consisting of the following:

As part of the Bankruptcy Filing, we and certain of our subsidiaries obtained the DIP Facilities. The DIP Facilities were used in part to repay in full the outstanding obligations under our existing ABL facility (the “Old ABL Facility”). The DIP Facilities were comprised of a $270 million asset-based revolving loan (the “DIP ABL Facility”) and a $300 million term loan (the “DIP Term Loan Facility”). In conjunction with our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, on October 24, 2014, the DIP Term Loan Facility was paid in full and terminated, and the DIP ABL Facility was converted into the ABL Facility.

In addition, supported by our strong balance sheet and specialties portfolio, we initiated a debt buyback program and repurchased approximately $19 million in aggregate principal amount of our Second Lien Notes for approximately $10 million with cash generated in the quarter. We recorded a net gain of $7 million as a result of paying down this debt at less than its aggregate principal amount. The repurchased notes have been canceled, reducing the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes outstanding from $250 million to $231 million.

Our net working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $450 million and $503 million, respectively. A summary of the components of our net working capital as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

50

Table of Contents

The decrease in net working capital of $53 million from December 31, 2014 was due to exchange rate fluctuations of $22 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen and due to longer payment terms with vendors following our emergence from Chapter 11.

We have the ability to borrow from the ABL Facility to support our short-term liquidity requirements. During 2015, we did not draw from our ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility

2016 Outlook

Following, and as a result of, our emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings, we believe we are favorably positioned to fund our ongoing liquidity requirements. We believe that due to our businesses operating cash flows as well as our $433 million of liquidity in the form of cash and our ABL facility, our long-term debt maturities in 2021 and 2022, and our annual debt service costs of approximately $57 million, our business has adequate capital resources to meet material commitments coming due during the next 12-month period. The additional liquidity provided by the rights offerings in connection with the Chapter 11 process (the “Rights Offerings”) and the impact of the Plan of Reorganization on our capital structure, resulting in reduced annual debt service obligations of approximately $240 million, increased our future operational and financial flexibility and left us well positioned to make strategic capital investments, leverage our leadership positions with both our customers and suppliers, optimize our portfolio and drive new growth programs. Our business is impacted by general economic and industrial conditions, including general industrial production, automotive builds, housing starts, construction activity, consumer spending and semiconductor capital equipment investment, and these factors could have negative effects to our liquidity. Our business has both geographic and end market diversity, which often reduces the impact of any one of these factors on our overall performance.

Capital spending in 2016 is expected to be approximately $135 million, of which approximately $55 million relate to certain growth and productivity projects and we are continuing to focus on optimizing our working capital and expect it to be a source of cash in 2016.

Debt Repurchases and Other Transactions

From time to time, depending upon market, pricing and other conditions, as well as on our cash balances and liquidity, we or our affiliates may seek to acquire (and have acquired) notes or other indebtedness of the Company through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, redemption or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or our affiliates may determine (or as may be provided for in the indentures governing the notes), for cash or other consideration. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2015, we repurchased $19 million in aggregate principal amount of our Second Lien Notes for approximately $10 million, resulting in a net gain of $7 million. All repurchased notes were canceled at the time of repurchase, reducing the aggregate principal amount of these notes outstanding from $250 million to $231 million. In addition, we have considered and will continue to evaluate potential transactions to reduce net debt, such as debt for debt exchanges and other transactions. There can be no assurance as to which, if any, of these alternatives or combinations thereof we or our affiliates may choose to pursue in the future as the pursuit of any alternative will depend upon numerous factors such as market conditions, our financial performance and the limitations applicable to such transactions under our financing documents.

51

Table of Contents

Sources and Uses of Cash

Following are highlights from our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

Operating Activities

In 2015, operations generated $128 million of cash. Net income of $83 million included $147 million of net non-cash income items, of which mainly $153 million was for depreciation and amortization and $22 million was for amortization of debt discount costs, offset primarily by $10 million of unrealized foreign currency gains, $16 million of unrealized gains related to the re-measurement and curtailment related to our pension liabilities and $7 million related to gain on the extinguishment of debt. Net working capital generated $30 million of cash, as opposed to $80 million of cash used during the year ended December 31, 2014. This change was primarily driven by customer mix and timing of collections as well as a decrease in accounts payable due to longer payment terms with vendors following our emergence from Chapter 11. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable are driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, pension plan contributions and taxes.

In 2014, operations used $210 million of cash. Net income of $1,625 million included $1,755 million of net non-cash income items, of which $2,078 million was for non-cash reorganization items, which were partially offset by other various non-cash expenses. These other non-cash expenses included $169 million for depreciation and amortization, a $19 million reclassification of DIP Facility financing fees to “Financing Activities”, a $15 million non-cash charge for unrealized losses related to the remeasurement of our pension liabilities, $101 million of unrealized foreign currency losses, $10 million of deferred tax expense and $4 million for the amortization of debt discount. Net working capital used $80 million of cash, as opposed to $47 million of cash used in the year ended December 31, 2013. This change was primarily driven by increases in sales volumes and the related impact on accounts receivable and inventory, as well as a decrease in accounts payable of $14 million. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable remained flat. These changes are driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, pension plan contributions and taxes.

In 2013, operations used $150 million of cash. Net loss of $464 million included $364 million of non-cash expense items, of which $171 million was for depreciation and amortization, $81 million was for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs, $86 million was for deferred tax expense, $10 million was for the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs and $12 million was for unrealized foreign currency losses. Net working capital used $47 million of cash, as compared to $7 million of cash used in the year ended December 31, 2012. This change was primarily driven by the increase in sales volume and impact on accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable used cash of $3 million, and are driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, taxes, pension plan contributions and restructuring expenses.

52

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

In 2015, investing activities used $116 million of cash. We spent $114 million for ongoing capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects (of which $111 million represented current year asset additions, with the remainder being the change in the accounts payable related to capital spending).

In 2014, investing activities used $88 million of cash. We spent $96 million for ongoing capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects (of which $87 million represented current year asset additions, with the remainder being the change in the accounts payable related to capital spending). We also spent $2 million on the acquisition of intangible assets. These expenditures were partially offset by the consolidation of Superholdco Finance Corp. (“Finco”), which provided a $50 million increase in cash, as well as $12 million in proceeds received from the sale of a subsidiary to Hexion.

In 2013, investing activities used $88 million of cash. We spent $81 million for ongoing capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects. We also spent $3 million on the acquisition of intangible assets, and an increase in restricted cash used $5 million. These expenditures were partially offset by proceeds of $1 million from the sale of certain assets.

Financing Activities

In 2015, financing activities used $10 million of cash mainly due to the buyback of $19 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.69% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022.

In 2014, financing activities provided $389 million of cash. Proceeds from the Rights Offerings provided cash of $600 million. Net long-term debt repayments were $135 million, which primarily consisted of net repayments under the Old ABL Facility and a $75 million revolving credit facility (the “Cash Flow Facility”), and net short-term debt repayments were $7 million. Additionally, the repayment of an affiliated loan in conjunction with various transactions with Finco used cash of $50 million. We also paid $19 million in financing fees related to our DIP Facilities.

In 2013, financing activities provided $220 million of cash. Net long-term debt borrowings were $132 million, which consisted primarily of net borrowings under the Old ABL Facility of $135 million. Net short-term debt repayments were $2 million. We also paid $12 million in financing fees related to our Old ABL Facility, and received proceeds from a capital contribution of $102 million from our parent.

At December 31, 2015, there were $53 million in outstanding letters of credit and no borrowings outstanding under our $270 million ABL Facility, leaving unused borrowing capacity of $217 million.

The credit agreement governing the ABL Facility contains various restrictive covenants that prohibit us and/or restrict our ability to prepay indebtedness, including our First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes (collectively, the “notes”). In addition, the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility and the indentures governing our notes, among other things, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or liens, make investments or declare or pay any dividends. However, all of these restrictions are subject to exceptions.

There are certain restrictions on the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to the parent of such subsidiaries in the form of cash dividends, loans or otherwise, which primarily arise as a result of certain foreign government regulations or as a result of restrictions within certain subsidiaries’ financing agreements that limit such transfers to the amounts of available earnings and profits or otherwise limit the amount of dividends that can be distributed. In either case, we have alternative methods to obtain cash from these subsidiaries in the form of intercompany loans and/or returns of capital in such instances where payment of dividends is limited to the extent of earnings and profits.

53

Table of Contents

We are recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in our U.S. consolidated income tax return as of December 31, 2015 and are expecting that, with the exception of Germany and Japan, all earnings will be repatriated to the United States. We have accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings. In addition, we have certain intercompany arrangements that, if settled, may trigger taxable gains or losses based on foreign currency exchange rates in place at the time of settlement. As a result, are asserting permanent reinvestment with respect to certain intercompany arrangements considered indefinite.

Covenants under the ABL Facility and the Notes

The instruments that govern our indebtedness contain, among other provisions, restrictive covenants (and incurrence tests in certain cases) regarding indebtedness, dividends and distributions, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales, affiliate transactions, capital expenditures and, under certain circumstances, the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio, as further described below. Payment of borrowings under the ABL Facility and our notes may be accelerated if there is an event of default as determined under the governing debt instrument. Events of default under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, a material breach of a representation or warranty, events of bankruptcy, a change of control and most covenant defaults. Events of default under the indentures governing our notes include the failure to pay principal and interest, a failure to comply with covenants, subject to a 30-day grace period in certain instances, and certain events of bankruptcy.

The ABL Facility does not have any financial maintenance covenant other than a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that would only apply if our availability under the ABL Facility at any time was less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured on a last twelve months, or LTM, basis and calculated as of the last day of the applicable fiscal quarter.

In addition to the financial maintenance covenant described above, we are also subject to certain incurrence tests under the indentures governing our notes that restrict our ability to take certain actions if we are unable to meet specified ratios. For instance, the indentures governing our notes contain an incurrence test that restricts our ability to incur indebtedness or make investments, among other actions, if we do not maintain an Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio (measured on a LTM basis) of at least 2.0 to 1.0. The Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio under the indentures is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA to (b) net interest expense excluding the amortization or write-off of deferred financing costs, each measured on a LTM basis. The restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness or make investments under the indentures that apply as a result, however, are subject to exceptions, including exceptions that permit indebtedness under the ABL Facility.

At December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility and under the indentures governing the notes.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash and certain non-recurring items and other adjustments calculated on a pro-forma basis, including the expected future cost savings from business optimization or other programs and the expected future impact of acquisitions, in each case as determined under the governing debt instrument. As we are highly leveraged, we believe that including the supplemental adjustments that are made to calculate Adjusted EBITDA provides additional information to investors about our ability to comply with our financial covenants and to obtain additional debt in the future. Adjusted EBITDA is not a defined term under U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial condition, liquidity or profitability, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or operating cash flows determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, EBITDA is not

54

Table of Contents

intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not take into account certain items such as interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, depreciation and amortization expense (because we use capital assets, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue), working capital needs, tax payments (because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, it is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate), non-recurring expenses and capital expenditures. Fixed Charges under the indentures should not be considered as an alternative to interest expense.

The following table reconciles Net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and calculates the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges as calculated under our indentures for the period presented:

55

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2015. Our contractual cash obligations consist of legal commitments at December 31, 2015 that require us to make fixed or determinable cash payments, regardless of the contractual requirements of the specific vendor to provide us with future goods or services. This table does not include information about most of our recurring purchases of materials used in our production; our raw material purchase contracts do not meet this definition since they generally do not require fixed or minimum quantities. Contracts with cancellation clauses are not included, unless a cancellation would result in a major disruption to our business. These contractual obligations are grouped in the same manner as they are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in order to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations.

The table above excludes payments for income taxes and environmental obligations since, at this time, we cannot determine either the timing or the amounts of all payments beyond 2015. At December 31, 2015, we recorded unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $40 million. We estimate that we will pay approximately $18 million in 2016 for local, state and international income taxes. We expect non-capital environmental expenditures for 2016 through 2020 totaling $25 million. See Notes 13 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for more information on these obligations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we have to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts of reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the

56

Table of Contents

financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management to select the appropriate assumptions to determine these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty; therefore, actual results may differ significantly from estimated results. We base these judgments on our historical experience, advice from experienced consultants, forecasts and other available information, as appropriate. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment dates. Deferred tax assets are subject to valuation allowances based upon management’s estimates of realizability.

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had valuation allowances of $419 million and $309 million, respectively, against our deferred income tax assets. At December 31, 2015, we had a $243 million valuation allowance against a portion of our net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $176 million against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany. At December 31, 2014, we had a $106 million valuation allowance against all of our net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $203 million against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany. The valuation allowances require an assessment of both negative and positive evidence, such as operating results during the most recent three-year period. This evidence is given more weight than our expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain.

We considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The Company evaluated four possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of deferred tax assets: