UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

333-4028la

(Commission file No.)

 

MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 915 West Imperial Highway, Brea, Suite 120, California, 92821

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(714) 671-5720

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes    No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer.  See the definitions of  “accelerated filer, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes   No .

 

At June 30, 2013, registrant had issued and outstanding 146,522 units of its Class A common units.  The information contained in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

---

 

MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

 

FORM 10-Q

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

---

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012

 (Dollars in Thousands Except Unit Data)

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

---

 

 MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

---

 

MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

---

 

MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The accounting and financial reporting policies of MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC (the “Company”, “we”, or “our”) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Ministry Partners Funding, LLC, MP Realty Services, Inc., and Ministry Partners Securities, LLC, conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and general financial industry practices.  The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have not been audited.  A more detailed description of our accounting policies is included in our 2012 annual report filed on Form 10-K.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at June 30, 2013 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have been made.

 

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

 

 

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Nature of Business

 

Ministry Partners Investment Company, LLC (the “Company”) was incorporated in California in 1991 as a C corporation and converted to a limited liability company on December 31, 2008.  The Company is owned by a group of 11 federal and state chartered credit unions, as well as the Asset Management Assistance Center of the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”), none of which owns a majority of the voting equity units of the Company.  One credit union owns only preferred units while the others own both common and preferred units.  Offices of the Company are located in Brea, California and Fresno, California.  The Company provides funds for real property secured loans for the benefit of evangelical churches and church organizations.  The Company funds its operations primarily through the sale of debt and equity securities and through other borrowings.  Most of the Company’s loans are purchased from its largest equity investor, the Evangelical Christian Credit Union (“ECCU”), of Brea, California. The Company also originates church and ministry loans independently. Nearly all of the Company’s business and operations currently are conducted in California and its mortgage loan investments cover approximately 29 states, with the largest number of loans made to California borrowers.

 

In 2007, the Company created a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary, Ministry Partners Funding, LLC (“MPF”), for the purpose of warehousing church and ministry mortgages purchased from ECCU or originated by the Company for later securitization.  MPF’s loan purchasing activity continued through early 2010, after which its operations ceased and its assets, including loans, were transferred to the Company.  MPF has no liabilities and is currently inactive. The Company closed down active operations of MPF effective as of December 31, 2009 but intends to maintain MPF’s existence as a Delaware limited liability company for possible future use as a financing vehicle to effect debt financing transactions.  MPF did not securitize any of its loans. 

 

On November 13, 2009, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, MP Realty Services, Inc., a California corporation (“MP Realty”).  MP Realty provides loan brokerage and other real estate services to credit unions, financial institutions, churches and ministries in connection with the Company’s mortgage financing activities and services it provides to federal and state chartered credit unions. On February 23, 2010, the California Department of Real Estate issued MP Realty a license to operate as a corporate real estate broker.

 

On April 26, 2010, we formed Ministry Partners Securities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“MP Securities”).  On July 6, 2010, MP Securities became a registered broker dealer firm under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and effective as of March 2, 2011, MP Securities’ application for membership in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) was approved.  MP Securities has been formed to provide financing solutions for churches, charitable institutions and faith-based organizations and act as a selling agent for securities offered by such entities. In May of 2012, MP Securities began selling Secured Investment Certificates pursuant to a private offering on our behalf.  On September 24, 2012, MP Securities received a no-objections letter from FINRA, thereby authorizing it to act as a selling agent for the Company’s Class A Notes public offering under

---

 

a registration statement declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on October 11, 2012.  In November 2012, MP Securities also began selling investments in mutual funds.  In March 2013, the Company entered into a selling agreement with MP Securities that enables the firm to sell the Company’s Series 1 Subordinated Capital Notes and 2013 International Notes. In addition to serving as a selling agent for our Class A Notes and other debt securities, MP Securities will distribute debt securities issued by religious organizations, as well as by business members of credit unions it serves and will act as a selling agent in placing mortgage backed business loans made by credit unions to institutional investors. 

 

Conversion to LLC

 

Effective December 31, 2008, the Company converted its form of organization from a corporation organized under California law to a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of California.  With the filing of Articles of Organization-Conversion with the California Secretary of State, the separate existence of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation ceased and the entity continued by operation of law under the name Ministry Partners Investment Company, LLC.

 

By operation of law, the converted entity continued with all of the rights, privileges and powers of the corporate entity and is managed by a group of managers that previously served as the Board of Directors.  The executive officers and key management team remained intact.  The converted entity by operation of law possessed all of the properties and assets of the converted corporation and remains responsible for all of the notes, debts, contract claims and obligations of the converted corporation.

 

Since the conversion became effective, the Company has been managed by a group of managers that provides oversight and carries out their duties similar to the role and function that the Board of Directors performed when the Company was organized and governed as a corporate entity.  Operating like a Board of Directors, the managers have full, exclusive and complete discretion, power and authority to oversee the management of the Company’s affairs.  Instead of Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, management and governance procedures are now set forth in an Operating Agreement that has been entered into by and between the Company’s managers and members.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ministry Partners Investment Company, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, MPF, MP Realty and MP Securities.  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to, but are not limited to, the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed real estate.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include time deposits, certificates of deposit, and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.  The Company had no cash positions other than demand deposits as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. 

 

Through midnight on December 31, 2012, all of our cash held at credit unions was insured by the National Credit Union Insurance Fund, while all cash held at other financial institutions was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).  This unlimited insurance expired on January 1, 2013.  We maintain cash that may exceed insured limits after December 31, 2012.  We do not expect to incur losses in our cash accounts.

---

 

Loans Receivable

 

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balance adjusted for an allowance for loan losses, deferred loan fees and costs, and loan discounts. Interest income on loans is accrued on a daily basis using the interest method. Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the related loan yield using the straight-line method, which results in an amortization that is materially the same as the interest method.  Loan discounts represent an offset against interest accrued and unpaid which has been added to loans that have been restructured.  Loan discounts are accreted to interest income over the term of the loan using the interest method once the loan is no longer considered impaired and is no longer in its restructure period.  Loan discounts may also represent the difference between the purchase price of a loan and the outstanding principal balance of the loan.  These discounts are accreted to interest income over the term of the loan using the interest method.

 

The accrual of interest is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due.  Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

 

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off are reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The Company sets aside an allowance or reserve for loan losses through charges to earnings, which are shown in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as a provision for loan losses.  Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

 

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

 

The allowance consists of general and specific components. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.  In establishing the allowance for loan losses, management considers significant factors that affect the collectability of the Company’s loan portfolio. While historical loss experience provides a reasonable starting point for the analysis, such experience by itself does not form a sufficient basis to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Management also considers qualitative (or environmental) factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, including:

 

These factors are adjusted on an on-going basis and have been increased in recent years in light of the economic recession and credit crisis. The specific component of the Company’s allowance for loan losses relates to loans that are classified as impaired.  For such loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

---

 

All loans in the loan portfolio are subject to impairment analysis.  The Company reviews its loan portfolio monthly by examining delinquency reports and information related to the financial condition of its borrowers and collateral value of its loans.  Through this process, the Company identifies potential impaired loans.  A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting future scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  A loan is generally deemed to be impaired when it is 90 days or more past due, or earlier when facts and circumstances indicate that it is probable that a borrower will be unable to make payments in accordance with the loan contract. 

 

Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.  When the Company modifies the terms of a loan for a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulties, a troubled debt restructuring is deemed to have occurred and the loan is classified as impaired.  Loans or portions thereof are charged off when they are determined by management to be uncollectible.  Uncollectability is evaluated periodically on all loans classified as “Loans of Lesser Quality.”  As the Company has an established practice of working to explore every possible means of repayment with its borrowers, it has historically not charged off a loan until just prior to the completion of the foreclosure process.  Among other variables, management will consider factors such as the financial condition of the borrower, and the value of the underlying collateral in assessing uncollectability.   

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

A troubled debt restructuring is a loan for which the Company, for reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to a borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. From time to time, we have restructured a mortgage loan in light of the borrower's circumstances and capabilities. We review each of these cases on an individual basis and approve any restructure based on the guidance stipulated in our collections policy. If we decide to accept a loan restructure, we generally will not forgive or reduce the principal amount owed on the loan; in addition, the typical maturity term for a restructured loan does not exceed five years.  A restructuring of a loan usually involves an interest rate modification, extension of the maturity date, or reduction of accrued interest owed on the loan on a contingent or absolute basis. 

 

When we receive a request for a modification or restructure, we evaluate the strength of the borrower’s financial condition, leadership of the pastoral team and board, developments that have impacted the church and its leadership team, local economic conditions, the value of the underlying collateral, the borrower’s commitment to sound budgeting and financial controls, whether there is a denominational guaranty of any portion of the indebtedness, debt service coverage for the borrower, availability of other collateral and any other relevant factors unique to the borrower.  While we have no written policy that establishes criteria for when a request for restructuring a loan will be approved, our Credit Review Committee reviews each request, solicits written reports and recommendations from management, and summaries of the requests and actions taken by the Credit Review Committee are presented to the Company’s managers for their review at quarterly meetings throughout the year.

 

Loans that are renewed at below-market terms are considered to be troubled debt restructurings if the below-market terms represent a concession due to the borrower’s troubled financial condition. Troubled debt restructurings are classified as impaired loans and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan's effective rate at inception of the loan. The change in the present value of cash flows attributable to the passage of time is reported as interest income.  If the loan is considered to be collateral dependent, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

 

In the current economic market, loan restructures often produce a better outcome for our loan portfolio than a foreclosure action. Given our specialized knowledge and experience working with churches and ministries, entering

---

 

into a loan modification often enables our borrowers to keep their ministries intact and avoid foreclosure.  With a successful loan restructure, we avoid a loan charge-off and protect the interests of the investors and borrowers we serve.

 

Loan Portfolio Segments and Classes

 

Management segregates the loan portfolio into portfolio segments for purposes of evaluating the allowance for loan losses. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which the Company develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for loan losses. The portfolio segments are segregated based on loan types and the underlying risk factors present in each loan type. Such risk factors are periodically reviewed by management and revised as deemed appropriate. 

 

The Company’s loan portfolio consists of one segment – church loans. The loan portfolio is segregated into the following portfolio classes:

 

Wholly-Owned First Collateral Position. This portfolio class consists of the wholly-owned loans for which the Company possesses a senior lien on the collateral underlying the loan.

 

Wholly-Owned Junior Collateral Position. This portfolio class consists of the wholly-owned loans for which the Company possesses a lien on the underlying collateral that is superseded by another lien on the same collateral.  This class also contains any loans that are not secured. These loans present higher credit risk than loans for which the Company possesses a senior lien due to the increased risk of loss should the loan default. 

 

Participations First Collateral Position. This portfolio class consists of the participated loans for which the Company possesses a senior lien on the collateral underlying the loan. Loan participations present higher credit risk than wholly-owned loans because the Company does not maintain full control over the disposition and direction of actions regarding the management and collection of the loans.  The lead lender directs most servicing and collection activities and major actions must be coordinated and negotiated with the other participants, whose best interests regarding the loan may not align with those of the Company.

 

Participations Junior Collateral Position. This portfolio class consists of the participated loans for which the Company possesses a lien on the underlying collateral that is superseded by another lien on the same collateral.  Loan participations in the junior collateral position loans have higher credit risk than wholly-owned loans and participated loans where the Company possesses a senior lien on the collateral.  The increased risk is the result of the factors presented above relating to both junior lien positions and participations.

Credit Quality Indicators

 

The Company’s policies provide for the classification of loans that are considered to be of lesser quality as watch, substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose the Company to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve close attention, are designated as watch.

 

Foreclosed Assets

 

Assets acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure less estimated costs of disposal, which establishes a new cost.  After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and foreclosed assets held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs of disposal.  Any write-down to fair value at the time of foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loan losses.  If the fair value, less costs to sell, of the foreclosed property decreases during the holding period, a

---

 

valuation allowance is established with a charge to operating expenses taken.  The Company’s real estate assets acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings are evaluated regularly to ensure that the recorded amount is supported by its current fair value and that valuation allowances to reduce the varying amount to fair value less estimated costs of disposal are recorded as necessary.  Revenue and expense from the operation of the Company’s foreclosed assets and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net expenses from foreclosed assets.  When the foreclosed property is sold, a gain or loss is recognized on the sale for the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the property.

 

Transfers of Financial Assets

 

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to have been surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

 

From time to time, the Company sells participation interests in mortgage loans it has originated or acquired. In order to recognize the transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, the transferred portion and any portion that continues to be held by the transferor must represent a participating interest and the transfer of the participating interest must meet the conditions for surrender of control. To qualify as a participating interest (i) each portion of a financial asset must represent a proportionate ownership interest in an entire financial asset, (ii) from the date of transfer, all cash flows received from the entire financial asset must be divided proportionately among the participating interest holders in an amount equal to their share of ownership, (iii) the transfer must be made on a non-recourse basis (other than standard representations and warranties made under the loan participation sale agreement) to, or subordination by, any participating interest holder, and (iv) no party has the right to pledge or exchange the entire financial asset. If the participating interest or surrender of control criteria is not met, the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing arrangement.

 

Under some circumstances, when the Company sells participations in a wholly-owned loan receivable that it services, it retains a servicing asset that is initially measured at fair value.  As quoted market prices are generally not available for these assets, the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of future expected cash flows associated with the loan receivable.  The Company amortizes servicing assets over the life of the associated receivable using the interest method.  Any gain or loss recognized on the sale of loans receivable depends in part on both the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the sale, allocated between the assets sold and the interests that continue to be held by the Company based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer and the proceeds received.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years.

 

Debt Issuance Costs

 

Debt issuance costs are related to borrowings from financial institutions and offerings of debt securities and are amortized into expense over the contractual terms of the debt or the life of the offering, respectively.

 

Income Taxes

 

Effective December 31, 2008, the Company converted from a C corporation to a California limited liability company (LLC). As a result, the stockholders of the Company became members of the LLC on the conversion date. The LLC is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes; therefore, the Company is no longer a tax-paying entity for federal or state income tax purposes, and no federal or state income tax will be recorded in its financial statements after the date of conversion. Income and losses of the Company are passed through to the members of the LLC for tax reporting purposes. The Company is subject to a California gross receipts fee of approximately $12,000 per year for years ending after December 31, 2008.  The Company’s subsidiaries are LLCs except for MP Realty,

---

 

which was organized as a California corporation.  MP Realty incurred a tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 and recorded a provision of $800 for the state minimum franchise tax.

 

The Company uses a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the consolidated financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions are recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met.

 

Smaller Reporting Company

 

As a public reporting company, the Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to Section 15(d) of that Act.  The Company qualifies as a “smaller reporting company” under SEC rules. As a result, the Company is not required to obtain an auditor attestation and report regarding management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting; is not required to provide a compensation discussion and analysis; is not required to provide a pay for performance graph or CEO pay ratio disclosure; and may present only two years of audited financial statements and related MD&A disclosure.  As a Section 15(d) filer, the Company is not required to file proxy statements under Section 14 of that Act and is not subject to the “say-on-pay”, “say-on-frequency” and “say-on-golden parachute” advisory voting requirements imposed under SEC Rule 14a-21.

 

Employee Benefit Plan

 

Contributions to the qualified employee retirement plan are recorded as compensation cost in the period incurred.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires entities to disclose additional information about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).  The ASU requires disclosures of changes of AOCI balances by component in the financial statements or the footnotes, and it requires significant items reclassified out of AOCI to be disclosed on the face of the income statement or as a separate footnote.  The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on Company’s financial statements.

 

 

2.  Related Party Transactions

 

We maintain most of our cash funds at ECCU, our largest equity investor. Total funds held with ECCU were $4.6 million and $9.5 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Interest earned on funds held with ECCU totaled $44.2 thousand and $74.4 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

We lease physical facilities and purchase other services from ECCU pursuant to a written lease and services agreement. Charges of $64.4 thousand and $56.4 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were incurred for these services and are included in office operations expense. The method used to arrive at the periodic charge is based on the fair market value of services provided.  We believe that this method is reasonable.

 

From time to time, we purchase mortgage loans, including loan participation interests from ECCU, our largest equity owner.  During the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, we purchased $896 thousand and $4.0 million of loans from ECCU, respectively.  With regard to loans purchased from ECCU, we recognized $1.6 million and $2.8 million of interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 

---

 

This income has decreased as the number of loans in our portfolio purchased from ECCU has decreased from $102.5 million at June 30, 2012 to $62.6 million at June 30, 2103 as we have begun servicing many of our own loans.  ECCU currently acts as the servicer for 30 of the 127 loans held in the Company’s loan portfolio.  Under the terms of the loan servicing agreement we entered into with ECCU, a servicing fee of 50 to 65 basis points is deducted from the interest payments the Company receives on wholly-owned loans ECCU services on its behalf.  In lieu of a servicing fee, loan participations the Company purchases from ECCU generally have pass-through rates which are up to 75 basis points lower than the loan’s contractual rate.  The Company negotiates the pass-through interest rates with ECCU on a loan by loan basis.  At June 30, 2013, the Company’s investment in wholly-owned loans serviced by ECCU totaled $8.6 million, while the Company’s investment in loan participations serviced by ECCU totaled $33.4 million.  From time to time, the Company pays fees for additional services ECCU provides for servicing these loans.  We did not pay any of these fees during the six months ended June 30, 2012. We paid fewer than one thousand dollars of such fees during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

ECCU has also repurchased mortgage loans from us as part of our liquidity management practices.  In addition, ECCU has from time to time repurchased from the Company fractional participations in the loan investments which ECCU already services, usually around 1% of the loan balance, to facilitate compliance with National Credit Union Association (“NCUA”) rules when participations in those loans were sold to federal credit unions.  Each sale or purchase of a mortgage loan investment or participation interest with ECCU was consummated under a Related Party Transaction Policy adopted by the Company’s Board.  No gain or loss was incurred on these sales.  No whole loans or loan participations were sold to ECCU during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 

 

Other Related Party Transactions

 

On December 14, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed R. Michael Lee to serve as a Company director.  Mr. Lee serves as Vice President Member Relations, Midwest Region, of Alloya Corporate Federal Credit Union (“Alloya”), formerly Members United Corporate Federal Credit Union (“Members United”).  See Note 6 for information regarding the Company’s borrowings from Members United.  The Company has $91.9 thousand on deposit with Alloya as of June 30, 2013.

 

From time to time, our Board and members of our executive management team have purchased investor notes from us. Investor notes payable to related parties total $488.6 thousand and $446.0 thousand at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. 

 

We have also entered into a selling agreement with our wholly-owned subsidiary, MP Securities, pursuant to which MP Securities acts as a selling agent for our 2012 Secured Investment Certificates, which are notes we sell under a private placement memorandum and which are secured by loans or cash. Selling commissions and cost reimbursements paid to any broker-dealer firms that is engaged to assist in the distribution of such certificates will not exceed 3% of the amount of certificates sold. 

 

MP Securities also acts as a selling agent for our Class A Notes offering pursuant to a Registration Statement which was declared effective by the SEC on October 11, 2012.  Our affiliate, MP Securities, will sell most of the Class A Notes being registered.  Each participating broker in the Class A Notes offering, including MP Securities, will be entitled to receive commissions ranging from .5%, plus an amount equal to .25% per annum on the average note balance for a Variable Series Note, to 5% per sale for a Flex Series or 60 month Fixed Series Note depending on whether it sells a Fixed Series, Variable Series or Flex Series note and the term of the respective note sold (12 months to 84 months).  For repeat purchasers of our Class A Notes, the gross commissions payable to the managing broker and share of commissions payable to MP Securities as a participating broker in the offering will be reduced by 0.25% of the total amount of Class A Notes sold in the offering to a repeat investor who is then, or has been within the immediately preceding thirty (30) days, a noteholder. 

 

In addition, we have entered into selling agreements with MP Securities pursuant to which MP Securities will act as a selling agent for our Series 1 Subordinated Capital Notes private offering and our 2013 International Notes private offering, which are notes we sell under private placement memoranda.  Selling commissions and cost reimbursements paid to any broker-dealer firm that is engaged to assist in the distribution of these notes will not exceed 2.5% of the amount of certificates sold. 

 

---

 

To assist in evaluating any related transactions we may enter into with a related party, our Board has adopted a Related Party Transaction Policy. Under this policy, a majority of the members of our Board and majority of our independent Board members must approve a material transaction that we enter into with a related party.  As a result, we anticipate that all future transactions that we undertake with an affiliate or related party will be on terms believed by our management to be no less favorable than are available from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by a majority of our independent Board members.

 

3.  Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses

 

We originate church mortgage loans, participate in church mortgage loans and also purchase entire church mortgage loans.  The loans fall into four classes:  whole loans for which the Company possesses the first collateral position, whole loans that are either unsecured or for which the Company possesses a junior collateral position, participated loans for which the Company possesses the first collateral position and participated loans for which the Company possesses a junior collateral position.  All of the loans are made to various evangelical churches and related organizations, primarily to purchase, construct or improve facilities. Loan maturities extend through 2023. Loans yielded a weighted average of 6.32% as of June 30, 2013, compared to a weighted average yield of 6.36% as of December 31, 2012.

 

On May 15, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement with Trinity Pacific Investments and Trinity Pacific OC involving two mortgage loan interests it had acquired from ECCU, which were the subject of foreclosure proceedings.  In exchange for transferring all rights, title and interest in these two mortgage loan interests, the Company received $2.425 million in cash and was relieved of any further obligations regarding the mortgage loan interests sold. Both loans were considered impaired.  The recorded investment in these loans was $2.460 million after discounts.  The loans also carried a total of $300 thousand in specific reserves that had been recorded in prior periods.  $35 thousand of these specific reserves were charged off against our allowance for loan losses.  The Company reversed the remaining $265 thousand of specific reserves related to these two loans, reducing the Company’s provision and allowance for loan losses and improving the Company’s balance sheets and statement of operations as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

On September 18, 2012, the Company entered into a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement with one of its borrowers.  As a result of this agreement, the Company received the property securing one of its impaired mortgage loan interests.  The Company has recorded the entire outstanding amount of the loan, $958.8 thousand, as a real estate owned asset on its financial statements.  On May 30, 2013, the Company sold the property to a new owner and approved two purchase money mortgage loans that will enable the ministry to purchase this property.  These loans totaled $1.0 million.

 

On February 26, 2013, the Company entered into a Whole Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement with ECCU.  As a result of this agreement, the Company received a loan and first trust deed to the underlying collateral on a church facility in exchange for $875 thousand.  The principal balance on this loan was $1.1 million at the time the agreement was entered into.  The Company recorded a discount for the difference between the cash paid and the principal balance.  The Company already had in its portfolio a loan made to the same borrower secured by a second trust deed on the property securing the purchased loan.  Immediately after the purchase, the Company restructured the loan as part of a troubled debt restructuring agreement pursuant to the Company’s collection policies.  This loan is included in the Company’s financial statements as an impaired and non-accrual loan but is not considered collateral-dependent.

 

On March 15, 2013, the Company entered into a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement with one of its borrowers and took title to the real estate property securing two impaired loans.  The Company agreed to lease the facility back to the defaulting ministry on a month-to-month basis until the property is sold.  The loans had a carrying value of $1.5 million, net of discounts and specific reserves totaling $1.1 million, at March 15, 2013.  No additional reserves were required to be taken on the acquired real property as a result of this transaction. The reserves on these loans were charged off at acquisition and the property was recorded in foreclosed assets at $1.5 million.  No valuation allowance has been recorded against the property at June 30, 2013.  We have entered into an agreement to sell this property for a purchase price of approximately $1.78 million, subject to purchase price adjustments that may be made at closing.  The purchase transaction is expected to close in September 2013.  If the Company is successful in closing this purchase transaction in September, the Company may recover a portion of the reserves for loan losses

---

 

that were written off at the time of foreclosure.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

An allowance for loan losses of $3.0 million as of June 30, 2013 and $4.0 million as of December 31, 2012 has been established for loans held in the Company’s mortgage portfolio. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, we reported total charge-offs of $1.0 million on three of our mortgage loan investments, as compared to $47 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2012. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is appropriate.

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months period ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Performing Loans

 

Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, restructured loans, and other impaired loans where the net present value of estimated future cash flows is lower than the outstanding principal balance.  Non-accrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued.  Restructured loans are loans in which the borrower has been granted a concession on the interest rate or the original repayment terms due to financial distress. Non-performing loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of our loan review and work-out process.  The potential risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of projected future cash flows.  The following is a summary of our nonperforming loans (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

We had eleven nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  As of June 30, 2013, we have completed foreclosure proceedings on two loan participation interests we acquired from ECCU.  We also acquired two properties pursuant to Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreements we entered into with two of our borrowers.  In addition, we have two loans totaling $3.4 million that are currently in foreclosure proceedings.  There is a reserve of $338.0 thousand that has been recorded as an allowance for loan losses on these loans.  In April 2012, we completely wrote off one nonaccrual loan as uncollectible.  However, as this loan carried a discount for the entire

---

 

principal balance, our recorded investment in the loan was zero and the write-off had no impact on our net loans receivable balance. 

The Company’s loan portfolio is comprised of one segment – church loans. The loans fall into four classes: whole loans for which the Company possesses the first collateral position, whole loans that are either unsecured or for which the Company possesses a junior collateral position, participated loans for which the Company possesses the first collateral position, and participated loans for which the Company possesses a junior collateral position.

Loans by portfolio segment (church loans) and the related allowance for loan losses are presented below. Loans and the allowance for loan losses are further segregated by impairment methodology (dollars in thousands).

 

 

 

The Company has established a standard loan grading system to assist management and loan review personnel in their analysis and supervision of the loan portfolio.  The loan grading system is as follows:

 

Pass: The borrower generates sufficient cash flow to fund its debt service obligations.  The borrower may be able to obtain similar financing from other lenders with comparable terms.  The risk of default is considered low.

 

Watch: These loans exhibit potential or developing weaknesses that deserve extra attention from credit management personnel. If the developing weakness is not corrected or mitigated, there may be deterioration in the ability of the borrower to repay the debt in the future.  Loans graded Watch must be reported to executive management and the Board of Managers.  Potential for loss under adverse circumstances is elevated, but not foreseeable.

 

Substandard: Loans and other credit extensions bearing this grade are considered to be inadequately protected by the current sound worth and debt service capacity of the borrower or of any pledged collateral. These obligations, even if apparently protected by collateral value, have well-defined weaknesses related to adverse financial, managerial, economic, ministry, or environmental conditions which have clearly jeopardized repayment of principal and interest as originally intended. Furthermore, there is the possibility that some future loss will be sustained if such weaknesses are not corrected.

 

Doubtful: This classification consists of loans that display the properties of substandard loans with the added characteristic that the severity of the weaknesses makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable or improbable based upon currently existing facts, conditions, and values. The probability of some loss is very high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors, the amount of loss cannot be exactly determined.

---

 

Such pending factors could include merger or liquidation, additional capital injection, refinancing plans, or perfection of liens on additional collateral.

 

Loss: Loans in this classification are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset. This classification does not mean the loan has absolutely no recovery value, but that it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be obtained in the future.

 

The following table is a summary of the loan portfolio credit quality indicators by loan class at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which is the date on which the information was updated for each credit quality indicator (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

---

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s loan portfolio delinquencies by loan class and amount at June 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

---

 

The following tables are summaries of impaired loans by loan class at June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012.  The recorded investment in impaired loans reflects the balances in the financial statements, whereas the unpaid principal balance reflects the balances before discounts and partial chargeoffs (dollars in thousands):

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

A summary of nonaccrual loans by loan class at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

---

 

 

 

The following are summaries of troubled debt restructurings by loan class that were modified during the period ended June 30 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

For one of the two loans restructured during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as well as for four of the five loans restructured during the three months ended June 30, 2012, unpaid accrued interest at the time of the loan restructure was added to the principal balance.  The amount of interest added was also recorded as a loan discount, and thus did not increase our net loan balance. The other loan restructured during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was the rollover of a previously restructured loan.  No accrued interest was added to this loan at the time of the rollover.  The other loan restructured during the three months ended June 30, 2012 represents the modified loan balance upon foreclosure on two of three underlying properties.  In addition, for each of the restructured loans, the interest rate was lowered.  Each borrower involved in a troubled debt restructuring was experiencing financial difficulties at the time the loan was restructured.

---

 

A summary of troubled debt restructurings that defaulted during the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

There were no troubled debt restructurings that defaulted during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

Loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator for future default.  If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, the Company evaluates such loans for potential further impairment.  As a result of this evaluation, specific reserves may be increased or adjustments may be made in the allocation of reserves.

 

No additional funds were committed to be advanced in connection with loans modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

4.  Foreclosed Assets

 

Assets acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure less estimated costs of disposal, which establishes a new cost.  After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and foreclosed assets held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs of disposal.  Any write-down to fair value at the time of foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loan losses.  The Company’s real estate assets acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings are evaluated regularly to ensure that the recorded amount is supported by its current fair value and that valuation allowances to reduce the varying amount to fair value less estimated costs of disposal are recorded as necessary.  Revenue and expense from the operation of the Company’s foreclosed assets and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net expenses from foreclosed assets.

 

Foreclosed assets at June 30, 2013 consist of four properties.  One property was acquired during 2011 in satisfaction of a secured loan.  The property had a carrying value of $1.4 million at June 30, 2013 and no valuation allowance has been required for this property.  An additional two properties were acquired in February 2012 in partial satisfaction of a secured loan.  The properties had a carrying value of $581.2 thousand at June 30, 2013 which includes a $136.0 thousand valuation allowance.  Finally, one property was acquired in March 2013 as a result of another Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement the Company entered into with a borrower.  The property had a carrying value of $1.5 million at June 30, 2013 and no valuation allowance has been required for this property.  The Company held $3.4 million and $2.9 million of foreclosed assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

One property was acquired in September 2012 as a result of a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement the Company entered into with a borrower.   On May 30, 2013, the Company originated two loans totaling $1.0 million to a third party for the sale of this property.  The Company also received cash considerations of $50.0 thousand as part of the sale agreement.  The property was carried at a value of $958.8 thousand at the time of the sale.  The Company recognized a $50.0 thousand gain on the sale of real estate, and recorded a $41.2 thousand discount on the loans

---

 

originated to fund the purchase of the property.  The discount will be amortized into interest income over the life of the loans.

 

Foreclosed assets are presented net of an allowance for losses.  An analysis of the allowance for losses on foreclosed assets is as follows (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Expenses applicable to foreclosed assets include the following (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.  Loan Participation Sales

 

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company sold participations in two church loans totaling $5.4 million but retained servicing responsibilities for these loans.  As a result, we recorded servicing assets totaling $146.9 thousand, which are being amortized using the interest method.  The amortization of servicing assets is recorded as an adjustment to interest income and totaled $11.0 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013. 

---

 

We did not sell participations in any loans during the six months ended June 30, 2013 or the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

A summary of servicing assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.  Line of Credit and Other Borrowings

 

Members United Facilities

 

On October 12, 2007, the Company entered into two note and security agreements with Members United, a federally chartered credit union located in Warrenville, Illinois, which provides financial services to member credit unions (“Members United”). One note and security agreement was for a secured $10 million revolving line of credit, which is referred to as the “$10 Million LOC,” and the other was for a secured $50 million revolving line of credit.  The latter was amended on May 8, 2009 to allow the Company to borrow up to $100 million through the revolving line of credit. The Company refers to this as the “$100 Million CUSO Line.” Both credit facilities were secured by certain mortgage loans. The Company utilized the $10 Million LOC for short-term liquidity purposes and the $100 Million CUSO Line for mortgage loan investments.

 

In 2008, the Company borrowed the entire $10 million available on the $10 Million LOC which was converted to a term loan that was paid off in 2011.     

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s promissory note with Members United, once the $100 Million CUSO Line was fully drawn, the total outstanding balance was termed out over a five year period with a 30 year amortization payment schedule.  In addition, the term loan interest rate was specified by Members United and was re-priced to a market fixed or variable rate determined at the time the loan is restructured.  We used our $100 million Members United credit facility to assist us in financing our business.  For 2011, the weighted average interest rate we paid on the Members United facility was 3.98%.

 

On November 4, 2011, the Company and the National Credit Union Administration Board As Liquidating Agent of Members United Corporate Federal Credit Union (“Lender”) entered into an $87.3 million credit facility refinancing transaction (the “MU Credit Facility”).  The MU Credit Facility replaced the original $100 million CUSO Line entered into by and between the Company and Members United Corporate Federal Credit Union on May 7, 2008.  Unless the principal amount of the indebtedness due is accelerated under the terms of the MU Credit Facility loan documents, the principal balance and any interest due on the MU Credit Facility will mature on October 31, 2018.  Accrued interest is due and payable monthly in arrears on the MU Credit Facility on the first day of each month at the lesser of the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law under the loan documents or 2.525%.  The term loan may be repaid or retired without penalty, but any amounts repaid or prepaid under the MU Credit Facility may not be re-borrowed.  The balance of the MU Credit Facility was $79.7 million and $81.3 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

The MU Credit Facility includes a number of borrower covenants, including affirmative covenants to maintain the collateral free of liens, to timely pay the amounts due on the facility, to provide the Lender with interim or annual financial statements and annual and periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and maintain a minimum collateralization ratio of at least 128%.  If at any time the Company fails to maintain its required minimum collateralization ratio, it will be required to deliver cash or qualifying mortgage loans in an amount sufficient to enable it to meet its obligation to maintain a minimum collateralization ratio.  As of June 30,

---

 

2013 and December 31, 2012, the collateral securing the MU Credit Facility had an aggregate principal balance of   $102.4 million and $104.2 million, respectively, which satisfies the minimum collateralization ratio for this facility. 

 

In addition to the minimum collateralization requirement, the MU Credit Facility also includes covenants which prevent the Company from renewing or extending a loan pledged as collateral under this facility unless certain conditions have been met and requires the borrower to deliver current financial statements to the Company.  Under the terms of the MU Credit Facility, the Company has established a lockbox maintained for the benefit of Lender that will receive all payments made by collateral obligors.  The Company’s obligation to repay the outstanding balance on this facility may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an “Event of Default” as defined in the MU Credit Facility.  Such Events of Default include, among others, failure to make timely payments due under the MU Credit Facility and the Company's breach of any of its covenants.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the MU Credit Facility.

 

WesCorp Facility

 

On November 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan and Security agreement with Western Corporate Federal Credit Union (“WesCorp”), a federally chartered credit union located in San Dimas, California.  The agreement provided for a secured $28 million term loan, referred to as the “WesCorp Facility.”  We used $24.6 million of the proceeds from the WesCorp credit facility to pay-off a credit facility with the Bank of Montreal.  The WesCorp credit facility had a fixed interest rate of 3.95% and was initially secured by approximately $59.2 million of mortgage loans we previously pledged to secure a credit facility we had established with the Bank of Montreal but has been subsequently paid off. Thus, the loan was initially secured by excess collateral of approximately $30.8 million.

 

On March 20, 2009, the NCUA assumed control of WesCorp under a conservatorship proceeding initiated by the NCUA under regulations adopted under the Federal Credit Union Act.  Effective as of October 1, 2010, WesCorp was placed into liquidation by the NCUA.  Pursuant to a letter dated October 25, 2010, we were advised that our WesCorp credit facility had been transferred to the Asset Management Assistance Center (“AMAC”), a facility established by the NCUA.    

 

On November 4, 2011, the Company and the National Credit Union Administration Board As Liquidating Agent of Western Corporate Federal Credit Union (previously herein defined as “Lender”) entered into a $23.5 million credit facility refinancing transaction (the “WesCorp Credit Facility Extension”).  The WesCorp Credit Facility Extension amends, restates and replaces the WesCorp Facility entered into by and between the Company and Western Corporate Federal Credit Union on November 30, 2009.  Unless the principal amount due on the WesCorp Credit Facility Extension is accelerated under the terms of the loan documents evidencing such credit facility, the principal balance and any interest due on the facility will be payable in full on October 31, 2018.  Accrued interest on the WesCorp Credit Facility Extension is due monthly in arrears on the first day of each month at the lesser of the maximum rate permitted by applicable law under the loan documents or 2.525%.  The term loan may be repaid or retired without penalty, but any amounts repaid or prepaid under the WesCorp Credit Facility Extension may not be re-borrowed.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $21.9 and $22.5 million, respectively, was outstanding on the WesCorp Credit Facility Extension.

 

The WesCorp Credit Facility Extension includes a number of borrower covenants, including affirmative covenants to maintain the collateral free of liens, to timely pay the amounts due on the facility, to provide the Lender with interim or annual financial statements and annual and periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and maintain a minimum collateralization ratio of at least 150%.  If at any time the Company fails to maintain its required minimum collateralization ratio, it will be required to deliver cash or qualifying mortgage loans in an amount sufficient to enable it to meet its obligation to maintain a minimum collateralization ratio.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the collateral securing the WesCorp Credit Facility Extension had an aggregate principal balance of $32.9 million and $34.2 million, respectively, which satisfies the minimum collateralization ratio for this facility.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the Wescorp Credit Facility Extension.

 

---

 

Future estimated principal pay downs of our bank borrowings during the twelve month periods ending June 30 are as follows (dollars in thousands):  

 

 

In addition to regular principal payments, we also made $510.0 thousand in principal payments during the six months ended June 30, 2013 in order to remain in compliance with the minimum collateralization ratio requirements of our credit facility borrowings.

 

7.  Notes Payable

 

We also rely on our investor notes to make investments in mortgage loan assets and fund our general operations. Except for our private offering of secured notes, the notes are unsecured and are payable to investors who have purchased the securities, including individuals, churches, and Christian ministries, many of whom are members of ECCU. Notes pay interest at stated spreads over an index rate that is adjusted every month. Interest can be reinvested or paid at the investor's option. The Company may repurchase all or a portion of these notes at any time at its sole discretion, and may allow investors to redeem their notes prior to maturity at its sole discretion.  We have offered our investor notes under registered public offerings with the SEC and in private placements exempt under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Our Alpha Class Notes were initially registered with the SEC in July 2001 and an additional $75.0 million of new Alpha Notes were registered with the SEC in May 2007.  The sale of our Alpha Class Notes was discontinued in April 2008. 

 

The Alpha Class Notes contain covenants pertaining to limitations on restricted payment, maintenance of tangible net worth, limitation on issuance of additional notes and incurrence of indebtedness.  The Alpha Class Notes require the Company to maintain a minimum tangible adjusted net worth, as defined in the Loan and Standby Trust Agreement, of not less than $4.0 million.  The Company’s other indebtedness, as defined in the Loan and Standby Trust Agreement, and subject to certain exceptions enumerated therein, may not exceed $10.0 million outstanding at any time while any Alpha Class Note is outstanding.  The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2013.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $312 thousand and $2.8 million of Alpha Class Notes were outstanding, respectively.

 

In addition to the Alpha Class Notes, the Company has also offered its Class A Notes in three series, including a Fixed Series, Flex Series and Variable Series pursuant to registration statements filed with the SEC.    On June 24, 2011, we filed a Registration Statement with the SEC seeking to register an additional $75 million of the Company’s Class A Notes.  All of the Class A Notes are unsecured.  The offering includes three categories of notes, including a fixed interest note, a variable interest note, and a flex note, which allows borrowers to increase their interest rate once a year with certain limitations.  The interest rate the Company pays on the Fixed Series Notes and the Flex Series Notes are determined by reference to the Swap Index, an index that is based upon a weekly average Swap rate reported by the Federal Reserve Board, and is in effect on the date they are issued, or in the case of the Flex Series Notes, on the date the interest rate is reset. These notes bear interest at the Swap Index plus a rate spread of 1.7% to 2.5% and have maturities ranging from 12 to 84 months.  The interest rate the Company pays on a Variable Series Note is determined by reference to the Variable Index in effect on the date the interest rate is set and bears interest at a rate of the Swap Index plus a rate spread of 1.50% to 1.80%.  Effective as of January 5, 2009, the Variable Index is defined under the Class A Notes as the three month LIBOR rate. 

 

The Class A Notes also contain restrictive covenants pertaining to paying dividends, making redemptions, acquiring, purchasing or making certain payments, requiring the maintenance of minimum tangible net worth, limitations on

---

 

the issuance of additional notes and incurring of indebtedness.  The Class A Notes require the Company to maintain a minimum tangible adjusted net worth, as defined in the Class A Notes Trust Indenture Agreement, of not less than $4.0 million.  The Company’s other indebtedness, as defined in the Class A Notes Trust Indenture Agreement, and subject to certain exceptions enumerated therein, may not exceed $20.0 million outstanding at any time while any Class A Notes are outstanding.  The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2013. 

 

The Class A Notes have been issued under a Trust Indenture entered into between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank).  The Class A Notes are part of up to $200 million of Class A Notes the Company may issue pursuant to the US Bank Indenture.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $38.0 million and $40.5 million of these notes were outstanding, respectively.

 

Effective as of May 15, 2012, the Company temporarily discontinued the sale of the Class A Notes and deregistered the securities remaining unsold under the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed with the SEC on December 23, 2009 and declared effective on June 3, 2010.  The Company subsequently filed a Registration Statement seeking to register $75 million of its Class A Notes with the SEC.  This Registration Statement was declared effective as of October 11, 2012, and the Company thereafter resumed the sale of its Class A Notes.

 

Historically, most of the Company’s unsecured notes have been renewed by investors upon maturity.  Because the Company has discontinued its sale of Alpha Class Notes effective as of April 18, 2008, all holders of such notes that mature in the future may reinvest such sums by purchasing Class A Notes that have been registered with the SEC or, if they qualify as an eligible purchaser, other debt securities offered by the Company.  For matured notes that are not renewed, the Company funds the redemption in part through proceeds from the repayment of loans and newly issued notes payable.

 

From time to time, we have also sold unsecured general obligation notes having various terms to ministries and ministry related organizations in private offerings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Except for a small number of investors (in total not exceeding 35 persons), the holders of these notes are accredited investors within the  meaning of Regulation D under the Securities Act.

 

During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company launched the sale of its 2012 Secured Investment Certificates pursuant to a limited offering to qualified investors that meet the requirements of Rule 506 of Regulation D.  The secured investment certificates have been offered with maturity terms of 36,  60 and 84 months at an interest rate fixed on the date of issuance, as determined by the then current seven-day average rate reported by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board for interest rate swaps.  Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, serves as the trustee for the secured investment certificates.  Under the terms of the Trust Indenture entered into with Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the Company has established a mortgage loan investment fund for the benefit of investors and is required to maintain a minimum collateralization ratio equal to at least 105% of the principal amount of secured investment certificates that are issued and outstanding.

 

The Trust Indenture entered into with Wilmington Savings Fund Society , FSB, also contains standard covenants which require the Company to refrain from permitting any other senior lien to be created or maintained on the collateral securing the certificates, refrain from paying any dividends on the Company’s equity units if there is an uncured event of default with respect to the certificates, make timely payments of interest and principal due on the certificates and secure the assets of the fund.  The Company is in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2013.  At June 30, 2013, $106.3 thousand of these secured certificates were outstanding and $112.8 thousand in cash was pledged as collateral on these notes.  At December 31, 2012, $55.7 thousand of these secured certificates were outstanding and $67.8 thousand in cash was pledged as collateral on these notes. 

 

In February 2013, the Company launched the sale of its Series 1 Subordinated Capital Notes pursuant to a limited private offering to qualified investors that meet the requirements of Rule 506 of Regulation D.  The Series 1 Subordinated Capital Notes have been offered with maturity terms from 12 to 60 months at an interest rate fixed on the date of issuance, as determined by the then current seven-day average rate reported by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board for interest rate swaps. At June 30, 2013, $2.0 million in notes sold pursuant to this offering were outstanding. 

 

In March 2013, the Company launched the sale of a new private offering of its 2013 International Notes.  This offering was made only to qualified investors that meet the requirements of Rule 902 of Regulation S. Under the

---

 

Series 1 Subordinated Notes and 2013 International Notes offerings, the Company is subject to certain covenants, including limitations on restricted payments, limitations on the amount of notes that can be sold, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions, and proper maintenance of books and records.  The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2013.  No notes had been sold pursuant to this International Notes offering as of June 30, 2013.

 

We have the following notes payable at June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Future maturities for the Company’s investor notes during the twelve month periods ending June 30 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.  Preferred and Common Units Under LLC Structure

On May 14, 2013, the Company’s Series A Preferred Unit holders approved the adoption of an Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Units (the “Amended Series A Certificate”) pursuant to which holders of the Series A Preferred Units approved a reduction in the preferred dividend return payable to the Series A Preferred Unit holders (the “Series A Preferred Members”).  Under the original Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Units (the “Series A Certificate”), each holder of a Series A Preferred Unit was entitled to receive a quarterly cash payment equal to a percentage of the liquidation preference for a Series A Preferred Unit (set at $100 per Series A Preferred Unit) which was set at an annual rate of 190 basis points higher than the London Bank Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR) for one year in effect on the last day of the calendar month for which the preferred return is approved.  As approved by the Series A Preferred Members at the Special Meeting of the Series A Preferred Members, the preferred return payable on the Series A Preferred Units will be an annual rate of 25 basis points higher than the LIBOR in effect on the last day of the calendar month for which the preferred return is approved.  No other changes were made to the Series A Certificate.  In addition, the Series A Preferred Units are entitled to an annual preferred distribution, payable in arrears, equal to 10% of the Company’s profits, after subtracting from profits the preferred return (the “Preferred Distribution”).

---

 

The Series A Preferred Units have a liquidation preference of $100 per unit; have no voting rights; and are subject to redemption in whole or in part at the Company’s election on December 31 of any year, for an amount equal to the liquidation preference of each unit, plus any accrued and unpaid preferred return and Preferred Distribution on such units. The Series A Preferred Units have priority as to earnings and distributions over the Common Units. The resale of the Company’s Preferred Units and Common Units are subject to the Company’s first right of refusal to purchase units proposed to be transferred.  Upon the Company’s failure to pay a preferred return for four consecutive quarters, the holders of the Series A Preferred Units have the right to appoint two managers.

The Class A Common Units have voting rights.

 

9.  Retirement Plans

 

401(k)

 

Employees who are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the Automated Data Processing, Inc. (“ADP”) 401(k) plan upon the hire date. No minimum service is required and the minimum age is 21. Each employee may elect voluntary contributions not to exceed 60% of salary, subject to certain limits based on Federal tax law. The plan has a matching program, which qualifies as a Safe Harbor 401(k) plan. As a Safe Harbor Section 401(k) plan, the Company matches each eligible employee’s contribution, dollar for dollar, up to 3% of the employee’s compensation, and 50% of the employee’s contribution that exceeds 3%, up to a maximum contribution of 5% of the employee’s compensation.  Company matching contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $38.7 and $27.5 thousand, respectively.

 

Profit Sharing

 

The profit sharing plan is for all employees who, at the end of the calendar year, are at least 21 years old, still employed, and have at least 900 hours of service during the plan year. The amount annually contributed on behalf of each qualified employee is determined by the managers and is calculated as a percentage of the eligible employee's annual earnings. Plan forfeitures are used to reduce our annual contribution. The Company made no profit sharing contributions for the plan during the year ended December 31, 2012.  No profit sharing contribution has been made or approved for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

10.  Loan Commitments 

   

Unfunded Commitments

The Company is a party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include unadvanced lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the following financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk (dollars in thousands):

 

 

---

 

Undisbursed loans are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These loans are sometimes unsecured and may not necessarily be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed.  Commitments to extend credit are generally at variable rates.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

11.  Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy

Measurements of fair value are classified within a hierarchy based upon inputs that give the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

Management uses judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

 

Cash – The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets approximate fair value for cash.

 

Loans – Fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current average rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

 

Notes Payable – The fair value of fixed maturity notes is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for notes payable of similar remaining maturities.  The discount rate is estimated by Company management by using market rates which reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the notes.

 

Borrowings from Financial Institutions – The fair value of borrowings from financial institutions are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The discount rate is estimated Company management by using market rates which reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the notes.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments – The fair value of loan commitments is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining term of the agreements and the counterparties' credit standing. The fair value of loan commitments is insignificant at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Fair Value Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents such assets carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy (dollars in thousands):

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

Collateral-dependent impaired loans are carried at the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell, incorporating assumptions that experienced parties might use in estimating the value of such collateral. The fair value of collateral is determined based on appraisals. In some cases, adjustments were made to the appraised values for various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. When significant adjustments were based on unobservable inputs, the resulting fair value measurement has been categorized as a Level 3 measurement. Otherwise, collateral-dependent impaired loans are categorized under Level 2.

Foreclosed Assets  

 

Real estate acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings (foreclosed assets) is initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure less estimated costs of disposal, which establishes a new cost. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed and foreclosed assets held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs of disposal. The fair values of real properties initially are determined based on appraisals. In some cases, adjustments were made to the appraised values for various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparable properties included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market or in the collateral. Subsequent valuations of the real properties are based on management estimates or on updated appraisals. Foreclosed assets are categorized under Level 3 when significant adjustments are made by management to appraised values based on unobservable inputs. Otherwise, foreclosed assets are categorized under Level 2 if their values are based solely on appraisals. 

 

The valuation methodologies used to measure the fair value adjustments for Level 3 assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2013 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

---

 

 

 

 

 

12. Subsequent Event

On August 8, 2013, ECCU completed a partial loan foreclosure on various parcels of real property securing a collateral-dependent loan in which we hold a participation interest.   The transaction resulted in the reclassification of $1.7 million from loans receivable to real estate owned property in August 2013.  No loan loss reserves were required to be charged off in the reclassification. The $1.7 million represents the carrying value of the property, net of estimated selling costs.