10-K 1 c31056_10k.txt ================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (MARK ONE) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED] FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 ----------------- OR [_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 33-20018 PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY IN RESPECT OF PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------ (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) NEW JERSEY 22-2426091 ------------------------------- --------------------------------- (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) 213 WASHINGTON STREET, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07102-2992 ---------------------------------------------------- (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE) (800) 778-2255 ---------------------------------------------------- (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [X] NO [ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT). YES [ ] NO [X] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT (REGISTRANT) INDEX -----

ITEM PAGE NO. NO. ----- ----- COVER PAGE INDEX 2 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE 3 PART I 1. BUSINESS 4 2. PROPERTIES 6 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 6 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 6 PART II 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S INTERESTS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS 7 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 7 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 7 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 17 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 18 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 18 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 18 PART III 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 19 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 20 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 20 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 20 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 20 PART IV 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K 21 EXHIBIT INDEX 21 SIGNATURES 23

2 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE Certain of the statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including but not limited to those in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "includes," "plans," "assumes," "estimates," "projects," "intends", or variations of such words are generally part of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based on management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ("the Company") or the Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (the "Real Property Account"). There can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Company or the Real Property Account will be those anticipated by management. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and there are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements, including without limitation: general economic, market and political conditions, including the performance of financial markets, interest rate fluctuations and the continuing negative impact of the current economic environment; various domestic or international military or terrorist activities or conflicts; economic conditions in local markets in which the properties in the Real Property Account are located; volatility in the securities markets; reestimates of our reserves for future policy benefits and claims; changes in our assumptions related to deferred policy acquisition costs; our exposure to contingent liabilities; catastrophe losses; investment losses and defaults; changes in our claims-paying or credit ratings; competition in our product lines and for personnel; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and foreign securities markets; risks to our international operations; the impact of changing regulation or accounting practices; adverse litigation results; and changes in tax law. The Company does not intend, and is under no obligation to, update any particular forward-looking statement included in this document. 3 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (the "Real Property Account"), the Registrant, was established on October 30, 1987. The Real Property Account was established as a separate investment account of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ("Pruco Life of New Jersey"), pursuant to New Jersey law. The Real Property Account was established to provide a real estate investment option offered in connection with the funding of benefits under certain variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts (the "Contracts") issued by Pruco Life of New Jersey. The assets of the Real Property Account are invested in The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Partnership"). The Partnership, a general partnership organized under New Jersey law on April 29, 1988, was formed through an agreement among The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"), Pruco Life Insurance Company, and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, to provide a means for assets allocated to the real estate investment option under certain variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts issued by the respective companies to be invested in a commingled pool. The Partnership has an investment policy of investing at least 65% of its assets in direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate and participating mortgage loans. The largest portion of these real estate investments are direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate, such as office buildings, shopping centers, hotels, apartments, or industrial properties. Approximately 10% of the Partnership's assets are generally held in cash or invested in liquid instruments and securities although the Partners reserve discretion to increase this amount to meet partnership liquidity requirements. The remainder of the Partnership's assets may be invested in other types of real estate-related investments, including real estate investment trusts. Office Properties--The Partnership owns office properties in Lisle and Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois; Brentwood, Tennessee; and Beaverton, Oregon. Total square footage owned is approximately 465,000 of which 48% or 224,000 square feet are leased between 1 and 10 years. Apartment Complexes--The Partnership owns apartment complexes in Atlanta, Georgia and Raleigh, North Carolina. There are a total of 490 apartment units available of which 92% or 451 units are leased. Leases range from month to month to one year. In addition, on September 17, 1999, the Partnership invested in an apartment complex located in Jacksonville, Florida. This joint venture investment has a total of 458 units available of which 415 units or 91% are occupied. Leases range from month-to-month to one year. Also, on February 15, 2001, the Partnership invested in four apartment complexes located in Gresham/Salem, Oregon. This joint venture investment has a total of 493 units available of which 445 units or 90% are occupied. Leases range from month-to-month to one year. Retail Property--The Partnership owns a shopping center in Roswell, Georgia. The property is located approximately 22 miles north of downtown Atlanta on a 30-acre site. The square footage is approximately 314,000 of which 76% or 240,000 square feet is leased for between 1 and 20 years. On September 30, 1999, the Partnership invested in a retail portfolio located in the Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri areas. This joint venture investment has approximately 488,000 of net rentable square feet of which 83% or 404,000 square feet is leased for between 1 and 20 years. On May 17, 2001, the Partnership invested in a retail center located in the Hampton, Virginia. This joint venture investment has approximately 175,000 of net rentable square feet of which 100% is leased for between 1 and 20 years. On November 27, 2002, the Partnership invested in a retail center located in the Ocean City, Maryland. This joint venture investment has approximately 186,000 of net rentable square feet of which 100% is leased for between 1 and 30 years. Industrial Properties--The Partnership owns a warehouse/distribution center in Aurora, Colorado. Total square footage owned is approximately 278,000 of which 70% or 194,000 square feet are leased between 1 and 10 years. The Partnership's Bolingbrook, Illinois property, which had approximately 225,000 square feet, was sold on September 12, 2002. The Partnership's Salt Lake City, Utah property, which had approximately 183,000 square feet, was sold on January 28, 2003. Hotel Property--On December 10, 2003, the Partnership invested in a hotel located in the Portland, Oregon area. This joint venture investment has approximately 161 rooms. 4 Investment in Real Estate Trust--The Partnership liquidated its entire investment in REIT shares during December 2001. The Partnership's investments are maintained so as to meet the diversification requirements set forth in Treasury Regulations issued pursuant to Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the investments of variable life insurance and variable annuity separate accounts. Section 817(h) requires, among other things, that the partnership will have no more than 55% of the assets invested in any one investment, no more than 70% of the assets will be invested in any two investments, no more than 80% of the assets will be invested in any three investments, and no more than 90% of the assets will be invested in any four investments. To comply with requirements of the State of Arizona, the Partnership will limit additional investments in any one parcel or related parcels to an amount not exceeding 10% of the Partnership's gross assets as of the prior fiscal year. For information regarding the Partnership's investments, operations, and other significant events, see Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The following is a description of general conditions in the U.S. real estate markets. It does not relate to specific properties held by the Partnership. The Partnership does not have widely diversified holdings; therefore, the discussions of vacancy rates, property values and returns in this section are not necessarily relevant in the Partnership's portfolio. These results are not indicative of future performance. REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW Real estate property market fundamentals continued to deteriorate in most sectors and markets last year. However, real estate investment performance remained strong due to low interest rates and robust capital flows, both of which helped to further reduce capitalization rates. For example, strong performances continued in the fourth quarter among private institutional real estate investment, as measured by the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries ("NCREIF") index, and public equity REITs, as measured by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust ("NAREIT") Equity REIT Index. The NCREIF index had a 2.76% total return in 4th Quarter 2003, up noticeably from the 1.97% return in 3rd Quarter 2003. For the year, the NCREIF index returned 9.00%. The NAREIT Equity REIT Index improved 50 basis points during 4th Quarter 2003, when it returned 10.0%. For the year, the NAREIT index returned 37.1%. Rising interest rates or diminished investor interest in this asset class could cause investment performance to suffer, particularly given the deterioration in other market fundamentals noted above. OFFICE MARKET In 3rd and 4th Quarter 2003, the office market showed signs of improvement. Torto Wheaton, a commercial real estate research firm, reported that the 4th Quarter 2003 average vacancy rate declined 10 basis points to 16.8%, following vacancy decline in the 3rd Quarter, although average vacancy still increased for the year. Downtown and suburban markets both saw 10 basis points vacancy rate declines, to 13.9% for downtown markets and 18.5% for suburban markets. After a drop in total return during the previous quarter, the NCREIF office subindex increased by 0.38% to 1.63% in 4th Quarter 2003. The total return was comprised of a 1.96% income return and a 0.32% decline in property value. The Central Business District and suburban office subtypes both enjoyed improvements in return during the quarter. Central Business District properties returned 1.79% in 4th Quarter 2003, up from 1.56% in the prior quarter, while suburban properties improved from 1.05% to 1.53%, over the same period. APARTMENT MARKET After showing some improvement in the third quarter performance, the apartment market declined in 4th Quarter 2003. Slight negative absorption during the quarter reversed the positive trend from the previous two quarters and pushed the vacancy rate from 6.6% to 6.9%. Real Estate Information Standard ("REIS") states that seasonality as well as weak job growth are the two most likely explanations for the fourth quarter performance. Still, asking rents increased 0.5% for the quarter and 1.4% for all of 2003. 5 The performance of private investment in the apartment sector remained virtually unchanged during the most recent quarter, as appreciation and income returns were flat. The NCREIF apartment subindex returned 2.04% in the fourth quarter, up slightly from the 2.03% in the previous quarter. Appreciation declined by 30 basis points to 0.20%, while income increased from 1.49% to 1.54%. Garden-style apartments were again the top subtype performer, with a 2.13% return, followed closely by high-rise apartments, with a 2.06% return. Low-rise apartments were the lowest subtype performer, with a decline from a 1.89% return in 3rd Quarter 2003 to a 0.33% loss in 4th Quarter 2003. RETAIL MARKET Retail continued to be the only property sector where both space market fundamentals and investment performance were relatively balanced during the 4th Quarter. Retail vacancy rates increased only modestly as new supply and demand grew at similar rates. According to Property and Portfolio Research ("PPR"), a commercial real estate research firm, the average national retail vacancy rate increased to 12.7% in the third quarter last year from 12.5% in 2002 and 12.1% in 2001. After seeing returns drop in 3rd Quarter 2003, private investment in retail properties returned in the most recent quarter. The NCREIF retail subindex had a 6.29% total return during 4th Quarter 2003, a 3.25% improvement over the prior quarter due almost entirely to a large jump in appreciation. Regional malls were the best performing subtype with an 8.40% total return, followed by neighborhood centers (6.67%), super-regional malls (6.44%), community centers (4.68%) and power centers (3.30%). INDUSTRIAL MARKET Conditions in the industrial market continued to decline. According to Torto Wheaton, during 4th Quarter 2003, the average national availability rate for industrial properties increased 10 basis points from 11.6% to 11.7%. This is the 12th consecutive quarter of overall availability increases and the sixth consecutive since the market surpassed its previous high availability rate of 10.7%. According to NCREIF, although fundamentals continued to deteriorate, private investment in industrial properties increased for the second straight quarter, from 2.26% to 2.35%. The increase occurred despite a drop in income return to 1.98% from 2.06%. Appreciation increased 0.18% to 0.38%. Each subtype made gains, all from appreciation increases, as opposed to income gains. Flex space returned 2.32%, up from 2.11%, Office/Showroom/Manufacturing increased 1.11%, up from 0.90%, R&D registered a 2.02% return, up from 1.57%, and warehouse stood at 2.40%, up from 2.36%. HOTEL MARKET According to Smith Travel Research, a commercial real estate research firm, the hotel sector began to show improvement. During 4th Quarter 2003, hotel occupancy increased 2.8% to 55.2% on a year-over-year basis. Further, average room rates increased 0.8% to $82.48, and revenue per available room increased 3.6% over the same period. On a year-to-date basis through December, economy-class hotels are the only class to see a decrease in occupancy (1.1%) from the previous year. Other categories such as upper upscale (0.3%) upscale (0.8%) and independents (0.7%) all saw increases in occupancy during the same period. Private hotel investment abated in 4th Quarter 2003, after two consecutive quarters of strong growth. The NCREIF hotel subindex had a 0.37% total return in the most recent quarter, down from 2.50% in 3rd Quarter 2003, making it the worst performing subindex. The majority of the decline was due to a drop in appreciation return, which went from a positive 0.47% to a negative 1.35% during the quarter. Income also fell but by a much smaller margin than appreciation. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Not Applicable. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS Contract owners participating in the Real Property Account have no voting rights with respect to the Real Property Account. 6 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S INTERESTS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS Owners of the Contracts may participate by allocating all or part of the net premiums or purchase payments to the Real Property Account. Contract values will vary with the performance of the Real Property Account's investments through the Partnership. Participating interests in the Real Property Account are not traded in any public market, thus a discussion of market information is not relevant. As of December 31, 2003 there were approximately 2,956 contract owners of record investing in the Real Property Account. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE PARTNERSHIP

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Total Investment Income.............. $ 27,060,494 $ 27,077,048 $ 27,480,593 $ 26,387,938 $ 24,835,049 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Investment Income................ $ 10,613,409 $ 10,864,043 $ 12,350,306 $ 13,638,117 $ 13,279,589 Net Realized and Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Investment in Partnership.... (6,467,364) (8,517,663) (2,547,749) 4,487,022 (7,217,046) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting From Operations............ $ 4,146,045 $ 2,346,380 $ 9,802,557 $ 18,125,139 $ 6,062,543 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

FINANCIAL POSITION: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total Assets......................... $235,627,852 $229,720,113 $234,594,652 $221,512,296 $225,142,653 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Mortgage Loan Payable................ $ 43,934,494 $ 35,699,108 $ 28,994,521 $ 10,092,355 $ 10,184,662 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS All of the assets of the Real Property Account (the "Account") are invested in the Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Partnership"). Correspondingly, the liquidity, capital resources and results of operations for the Real Property Account are contingent upon the Partnership. Therefore, all of management's discussion of these items is at the Partnership level. The partners in the Partnership are The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company, and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (collectively, the "Partners"). The following analysis of the liquidity and capital resources and results of operations of the Partnership should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and the related Notes to the Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. (a) LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES As of December 31, 2003, the Partnership's liquid assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents were $18.9 million, an increase of $0.3 million from $18.6 million at December 31, 2002. The change in the Partnership's cash position was primarily due to an increase in net cash flows from operating and financing activities, property acquisitions and dispositions, and distributions to the Partners. The Partnership's investment policy allows up to 30% investment in cash and short-term obligations, although the Partnership generally holds approximately 10% of its assets in cash and short-term obligations. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, 8.02% and 8.1% of the Partnership's total assets consisted of cash and short-term obligations, respectively. 7 In 1986, Prudential committed to fund up to $100 million to enable the Partnership to acquire real estate investments. Contributions to the Partnership under this commitment were utilized for property acquisitions, and could be returned to Prudential on an ongoing basis from the contract owners' net contributions and other available cash. This commitment terminated on December 31, 2002. During the period that this commitment was in effect, Prudential funded $44 million. The Partnership made $6.9 million in distributions to the Partners during 2003, and $16.1 million in distributions during 2002. Distributions may be made to the Partners during 2004 based upon the percentage of assets invested in short-term obligations, taking into consideration anticipated cash needs of the Partnership including potential property acquisitions, property dispositions and capital expenditures. Management anticipates that its current liquid assets and ongoing cash flow from operations will satisfy the Partnership's needs over the next twelve months and the foreseeable future. On December 10, 2003, the Partnership acquired a controlling interest in a 161-room hotel located in Portland, Oregon for $8.0 million. In April 2003, the Partnership also bought out its minority partner's interest in a consolidated retail investment located in Hampton, VA for approximately $2.0 million. During 2003, the Partnership spent approximately $5.4 million in capital expenditures on wholly owned and consolidated joint venture properties. Approximately $3.2 million of that amount was associated with the development of the retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland. The remaining $2.2 million balance was primarily associated with renovations and leasing related costs at the apartment complexes located in Jacksonville, Florida and Gresham/Salem, Oregon, the industrial building located in Aurora, Colorado, the office buildings located in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois and Lisle, Illinois, and the retail center located in Roswell, Georgia. The Partnership also increased its investment in real estate partnerships by approximately $1.3 million in connection with the redevelopment and expansion of the retail centers located in Kansas City, Missouri. On January 28, 2003, the Partnership sold the industrial property located in Salt Lake City, UT for $5.8 million. On April 23, 2003, the Partnership also sold one of the retail centers located in Kansas City, Missouri for $2.6 million. (b) RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following is a brief year-to-date comparison of the Partnership's results of operations for the periods ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. 2003 VS. 2002 The following table presents a year-to-date comparison of the Partnership's sources of net investment income, and realized and unrealized gains or losses by investment type.

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 ---------- ---------- NET INVESTMENT INCOME: Office properties...................................................... $ 2,039,750 $ 4,837,432 Apartment complexes.................................................... 3,361,638 3,089,744 Retail properties...................................................... 6,638,838 3,888,641 Industrial properties.................................................. 993,962 1,429,036 Other (including interest income, investment mgt fee, etc.).............................................. (2,420,779) (2,380,810) ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET INVESTMENT INCOME............................................ $10,613,409 $10,864,043 =========== =========== NET UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS: Office properties...................................................... $(5,776,072) $(6,785,006) Apartment complexes.................................................... (141,845) (856,188) Retail properties...................................................... (455,340) (1,447,574) Industrial properties.................................................. (560,168) 177,573 ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.............................................. $(6,933,425) $(8,911,195) =========== ===========

8

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 ---------- ---------- NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS: Industrial properties.................................................. 466,061 395,110 Real estate investment trust........................................... -- (1,578) ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.............. 466,061 393,532 ----------- ----------- NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.............................................. $(6,467,364) $(8,517,663) =========== ===========

NET INVESTMENT INCOME OVERVIEW The Partnership's net investment income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 was $10.6 million, a decrease of $0.3 million from $10.9 million when compared to the corresponding period in 2002. The decrease is primarily due to increased vacancy within the office portfolio and the loss of income resulting from the sales of the industrial properties in Bolingbrook, Illinois in September 2002 and Salt Lake City, Utah in January 2003. Offsetting these decreases is the $1.9 million lease termination fee received at the retail center located in Roswell, Georgia. Equity in income of real estate partnership was $0.6 million for 2003, an increase of $0.3 million from $0.3 million in 2002. This increase is due to an increase in revenue associated with expansion of the existing grocery store anchor that was completed during the second quarter. Interest on short-term investments decreased approximately $0.2 million or 38.1% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 due primarily to lower interest rates. Interest expense increased $0.6 million, or 28.5%, in 2003 compared to 2002. This increase was primarily due to the Partnership's assumption of a $7.4 million mortgage loan in conjunction with the acquisition of a controlling interest in a retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland in late 2002 and the financing of an $8.8 million note placed on the apartment investment located in Raleigh, North Carolina on June 27, 2003. Minority interest expense decreased $0.1 million, or 37.0%, in 2003 compared to 2002. This decrease was primarily due to the Partnership's buyout of its minority partner's interest in the retail center located in Hampton, Virginia on April 15, 2003. VALUATION OVERVIEW The Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of $6.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 compared to a net unrealized loss of $8.9 million during the corresponding period in 2002. The unrealized losses during the twelve months of 2003 were experienced in the office, industrial, retail, and apartment sectors. The office portfolio recorded an unrealized loss totaling $5.8 million primarily due to decreases in occupancy coupled with soft market conditions which have resulted in reductions in market rental rates and increased leasing costs. The industrial property in Aurora, Colorado experienced an unrealized loss of $0.6 million for the twelve months of 2003 due to decreases in market rental rates and capital expenditures at the property that were not reflected as an increase in market value. The retail sector experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.5 million primarily due to the lease termination at the Roswell, Georgia retail center and capital expenditures that were not reflected as an increase in market value at the retail center located in Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri. Offsetting these losses in the retail sector was the gain in value due to strengthening market fundamentals, renovation and re-leasing efforts, and the authorization of the pre-leased expansion at the center located in Ocean City, Maryland. The apartment sector also experienced an unrealized loss of $0.1 million due to the apartment portfolio located in Gresham/Salem, Oregon. The decrease is a result of projected increases in operating expenses. 9 OFFICE PORTFOLIO

NET NET INVESTMENT INVESTMENT UNREALIZED UNREALIZED INCOME INCOME GAIN/(LOSS) GAIN/(LOSS) OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PROPERTY 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 ------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- ---------- YEAR TO DATE ------------ Lisle, IL $ 709,818 $1,471,120 $(1,910,862) $ (634,358) 47% 100% Brentwood, TN 714,837 623,256 (515,685) (1,320,126) 79% 78% Oakbrook Terrace, IL 102,262 1,167,132 (1,528,934) (3,335,782) 42% 27% Beaverton, OR 930,822 1,134,257 (800,000) (89,123) 81% 100% Brentwood, TN (417,989) 385,450 (1,020,591) (1,405,617) 0% 0% Morristown, NJ -- 56,217 -- -- Sold October 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $2,039,750 $4,837,432 $(5,776,072) $(6,785,006) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NET INVESTMENT INCOME Net investment income from property operations for the office sector decreased approximately $2.8 million, or 57.8%, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 when compared to the corresponding period in 2002 primarily due to increased vacancy and weak market fundamentals. UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS The five office properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $5.8 million during the twelve months of 2003. The losses were primarily due to decreased occupancy, lower market rents, and increased lease up costs. The five office properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $6.8 million during the twelve months of 2002. The decrease in values was primarily due to a reduction in market rental rates, softening market conditions, and a decrease in occupancy due to various near-term lease expirations, and the move-out of the single tenant occupying all of the space at one of the buildings in Brentwood, Tennessee. As of December 31, 2003 all vacant spaces were being marketed. APARTMENT COMPLEXES

NET NET INVESTMENT INVESTMENT UNREALIZED UNREALIZED INCOME INCOME GAIN/(LOSS) GAIN/(LOSS) OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PROPERTY 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 ------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- YEAR TO DATE ------------ Atlanta, GA $ 819,908 $ 741,358 $ (588,553) $(1,248,243) 91% 90% Raleigh, NC 738,292 921,263 95,512 691,840 93% 88% Jacksonville, FL 1,096,620 830,489 1,419,362 (208,115) 91% 90% Gresham/Salem, OR 706,818 596,634 (1,068,166) (91,670) 90% 92% ------------------------------------------------------- $3,361,638 $3,089,744 $ (141,845) $ (856,188) -------------------------------------------------------

NET INVESTMENT INCOME Net investment income from property operations for the apartment sector was $3.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $0.3 million, or 8.8%, when compared to the corresponding period in 2002. The increases were mainly due to the effect of a reclassification, which took place in 2003, of 2002 repairs and maintenance expenses to building improvements for the apartment complex located in Gresham/Salem, Oregon and increased operational efficiencies and occupancy throughout the year at the apartment complex located in Jacksonville, Florida during 2003. 10 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS The apartment complexes owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 compared to a net unrealized loss of $0.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The unrealized loss for 2003 was mainly attributable to the apartment complex located in Gresham/Salem, Oregon and the apartment complex located in Atlanta, Georgia due to an increase in projected operating expenses and capital expenditures, respectively. Offsetting this loss is the unrealized gain at the apartment complex located in Jacksonville, Florida due to market rent increases. The apartment complexes owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. These unrealized losses were due to softening market conditions, which have resulted in lower short-term occupancy and income projections, increased rental concessions, and increases in operating expense levels. As of December 31, 2003, all available vacant units were being marketed. RETAIL PROPERTIES

NET NET INVESTMENT INVESTMENT UNREALIZED UNREALIZED INCOME INCOME GAIN/(LOSS) GAIN/(LOSS) OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PROPERTY 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 ------------ ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- YEAR TO DATE ------------------ Roswell, GA $4,403,743 $2,773,770 $(1,571,423) $(1,738,842) 76% 93% Kansas City, KS; MO 560,660 276,206 (934,885) (638,838) 83% 87% Hampton, VA 1,077,627 757,239 570,136 917,041 100% 100% Ocean City, MD* 596,808 81,426 1,480,832 13,065 100% 99% ------------------------------------------------------- $6,638,838 $3,888,641 $ (455,340) $(1,447,574) -------------------------------------------------------

* Center purchased in November 2002 NET INVESTMENT INCOME Net investment income for the Partnership's retail properties was approximately $6.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $2.8 million, or 70.7%, when compared to the corresponding period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to a $1.9 million lease termination fee received at the retail center located in Roswell, Georgia, and the Partnership's acquisition of a controlling interest in a retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland in late 2002. Also on April 15, 2003 the Partnership acquired its joint venture partner's membership interest in the retail center located in Hampton, Virginia, thus entitling the Partnership to all of the net investment income generated by the investment commencing on the buyout date and going forward. UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS The retail properties experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. The Roswell, Georgia retail center had a decrease in value resulting from the lease termination as previously discussed. The Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri retail center experienced a net unrealized loss primarily due to capital expenditures, which were not reflected as an increase in market value. Offsetting these losses was the gain in value due to strengthening market fundamentals, renovation and re-leasing efforts, and the authorization of the pre-leased expansion at the center located in Ocean City, Maryland. The retail properties experienced a net unrealized loss of $1.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. This was primarily attributable to the center located in Roswell, Georgia due to increased risk that a major tenant would not renew its lease, coupled with a deterioration in the market position of the property and lower market rents. Also the Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri retail center experienced a net unrealized loss primarily due to capital expenditures that were not reflected as an increase in market value. Partially offsetting these losses, the retail center located in Hampton, VA experienced an unrealized gain due to the addition of 20,000 rentable square feet and an increase in occupancy. As of December 31, 2003, all vacant spaces were being marketed. 11 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES

NET NET UNREALIZED/ UNREALIZED/ INVESTMENT INVESTMENT REALIZED REALIZED INCOME INCOME GAIN/(LOSS) GAIN/(LOSS) OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PROPERTY 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/02 -------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- YEAR TO DATE ------------ Aurora, CO $687,743 $ 709,270 $(560,168) $493,793 70% 75% Bolingbrook, IL (146) 241,623 -- 395,110 Sold September 2002 Salt Lake City, UT 306,365 478,143 466,061 (316,220) Sold January 2003 ---------------------------------------------------- $993,962 $1,429,036 $ (94,107) $572,683 ----------------------------------------------------

NET INVESTMENT INCOME Net investment income from property operations for the industrial properties decreased from $1.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 to $1.0 million for the corresponding period ended December 31, 2003. The majority of this decrease was due to the sale of the industrial property located in Bolingbrook, Illinois during the third quarter of 2002 and the sale of the industrial property located in Salt Lake City, Utah during the first quarter of 2003. UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS The Aurora, Colorado industrial property owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 compared to a net unrealized gain of approximately $0.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The unrealized loss experienced in 2003 is due to soft market conditions and capital expenditures at the property that were not reflected as an increase in market value. The two industrial properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized gain of approximately $0.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The majority of the unrealized gain in 2002 was attributable to an increase in market rents. Offsetting this unrealized gain was the Salt Lake City, UT facility, which experienced a net unrealized loss due to capital expenditures at the property that were not reflected as an increase in market value and softening market conditions. As of December 31, 2003, all vacant spaces were being marketed. REALIZED GAIN On January 28, 2003 the industrial property located in Salt Lake City, Utah was sold for a realized gain of $0.5 million. On September 12, 2002 the industrial property located in Bolingbrook, Illinois was sold for a realized gain of $0.4 million. OTHER Other net investment income decreased $0.04 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 compared to the corresponding period in 2002. Other net investment income includes interest income from short-term investments, investment management fees, and portfolio level expenses. 2002 VS. 2001 The following table presents a year-to-date comparison of the Partnership's sources of net investment income, and realized and unrealized gains or losses by investment type. 12

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 ---------- ---------- NET INVESTMENT INCOME: Office properties .............................................................. $ 4,837,432 $ 4,766,035 Apartment complexes ............................................................ 3,089,744 3,735,912 Retail property ................................................................ 3,612,435 2,950,333 Industrial properties .......................................................... 1,429,036 545,003 Equity in income of real estate partnership .................................... 276,206 686,801 Dividend income from real estate investment trust .............................. -- 2,157,647 Other (including interest income, investment mgt fee, etc.) .................... (2,380,810) (2,491,425) ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET INVESTMENT INCOME .................................................... $10,864,043 $12,350,306 =========== =========== NET UNREALIZED LOSS ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS: Office properties $(6,785,006) $ (777,380) Apartment complexes (856,188) 415,417 Retail property (808,736) (94,504) Industrial properties 177,573 (2,105,641) Interest in real estate partnership (638,838) 226,024 ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET UNREALIZED LOSS ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS (8,911,195) (2,336,084) =========== ===========

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 ---------- ---------- NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS: Industrial properties 395,110 -- Real estate investment trust (1,578) (211,665) ----------- ----------- TOTAL NET REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 393,532 (211,665) ----------- ----------- NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSS ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS $(8,517,663) $(2,547,749) =========== ===========

The Partnership's net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $10.9 million, a decrease of $1.5 million from $12.4 million when compared to the corresponding period in 2001. The Partnership's liquidation of its investment in REIT stocks during the fourth quarter of 2001 resulted in no dividend income being received in 2002. Additionally, the occupancy at one of the Brentwood, TN properties had decreased to 0% in 2002 from 100% in 2001 due to the move-out of the single tenant. Equity in income of real estate partnership was $0.3 million for the twelve months of 2002, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 59.8%, from $0.7 million in the corresponding period in 2001. This decrease is due to a decrease in revenue associated with expansion of the existing grocery store anchor that commenced during the fourth quarter of 2001. It is anticipated that upon completion, both occupancy and rental rates will increase. Dividend income from real estate investment trusts decreased approximately $2.2 million, or 100.0%, during the twelve months of 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001. These decreases were due to the Partnership's liquidation of its investment in REIT stocks during the fourth quarter of 2001. Interest on short-term investments increased approximately $0.2 million or 53.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002 due primarily to higher average cash balance when compared to the corresponding period in 2001. Administrative expense increased $0.8 million, or 32.8%, in the twelve months of 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001. These increases were primarily due to the Partnership's acquisition of a portfolio of apartment complexes located in Gresham and Salem, OR in 2001, a retail center located in Hampton, Virginia in 2001, and a retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland in 2002. 13 Interest expense increased $0.2 million, or 12.0%, in the twelve months of 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001. This increase was primarily due to the Partnership's assumption of a $9.0 million and a $10.3 million mortgage loan in conjunction with the acquisition of a controlling interest in a portfolio of apartment complexes located in Gresham and Salem, Oregon and a retail center located in Hampton, Virginia in 2001. There was also the additional assumption of a $7.4 million mortgage loan in conjunction with the acquisition of a controlling interest in a retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland in 2002. The Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to a net unrealized loss of $2.3 million during the corresponding period in 2001. The unrealized losses during 2002 were experienced in the office, apartment and retail sectors. The office properties recorded an unrealized loss of $6.8 million primarily due to the buildings located in Brentwood, Tennessee and Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, where softening market conditions have resulted in reductions in market rental rates and increased leasing costs. In total, the apartment complexes in the portfolio experienced unrealized losses totaling $0.9 million for the twelve months of 2002. Weaker demand caused by higher rates of unemployment and a favorable interest rate environment for homebuyers has resulted in lower short-term occupancy and income projections. The retail sector also experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.8 million primarily due to uncertainty about a lease renewal by a major tenant. OFFICE PROPERTIES Net investment income from property operations for the office sector increased approximately $0.1 million, or 1.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2002 when compared to the corresponding period in 2001. The five office properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $6.8 million during the twelve months of 2002. The Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois property experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $3.3 million primarily due to softening market conditions and the lease expiration of a major tenant. One of the Brentwood, Tennessee properties experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $1.4 million primarily due to the move-out of the single tenant at the property in July 2002. Though occupancy increased by 4%, the other Brentwood, Tennessee property experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $1.3 million primarily due to softening market conditions. The Lisle, Illinois property experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.6 million primarily due to impending tenant rollover and softening market conditions. The office property located in Beaverton, Oregon experienced an unrealized loss of approximately $0.1 million due to lower market rental rates and the near-term lease expiration of one of the tenants. The five office properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.8 million during the twelve months of 2001. One of the Brentwood, Tennessee properties experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.7 million primarily due to the near-term expiration and expected move-out of the single tenant at the property in July 2002. The Beaverton, Oregon and the Lisle, Illinois office properties experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, primarily due to softening market conditions. Offsetting these unrealized losses was an unrealized gain of approximately $0.6 million at the office property located in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois. This unrealized gain was attributable to the signing of two new leases, which brought the leased area from 55% to 79%. Occupancy at one of the Brentwood, Tennessee office properties increased from 74% at December 31, 2001 to 78% at December 31, 2002. The other Brentwood, Tennessee office property decreased from 100% at December 31, 2001 to 0% at December 31, 2002. Occupancy at the Lisle, Illinois and Beaverton, Oregon office properties remained unchanged at 100% at December 31, 2001 and 2002. Occupancy at the Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois office decreased from 79% at December 31, 2001 to 27% at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002 all vacant spaces were being marketed. APARTMENT COMPLEXES Net investment income from property operations for the apartment sector was $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 17.3%, when compared to the corresponding period in 2001. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in average occupancy at the Atlanta, Georgia apartment complex. Average occupancy for the Atlanta, Georgia apartment complex was 90% and 83% for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Additionally, rental concessions were made with a goal attracting and retaining occupants thus resulting in lower revenue at all the apartment complexes. 14 The apartment complexes owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to a net unrealized gain of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Of the unrealized loss experienced in the twelve months of 2002, $1.3 million was experienced at the apartment complex located in Atlanta, Georgia. This unrealized loss was due to softening market conditions. The apartment complex located in Jacksonville, Florida experienced an unrealized loss of $0.2 million due to slightly higher expense estimates and soft ening market conditions. The apartment portfolio located in Gresham/Salem, Oregon, also experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.1 million primarily due to increases in operating expense levels and softening market conditions. Offsetting these losses, the apartment complex located in Raleigh, North Carolina experienced an unrealized gain of $0.7 million due to a reduced estimate of rent concessions and a reduction in certain operating expenses. The apartment complexes owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized gain of $0.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. The majority of the unrealized gain experienced in 2001 was primarily due to the Atlanta, Georgia apartment complex that experienced an increase in value of $0.9 million due to sub-metering of the apartments for water usage and lower real estate taxes than previously estimated. The apartment complex portfolio located in Gresham and Salem, Oregon also experienced an increase in value of $0.4 million due to the completion of capital improvements and a reduction of administrative expense estimates. Offsetting these unrealized gains was the apartment complex located in Raleigh, North Carolina, which experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.5 million due to a decrease in occupancy. The apartment complex in Jacksonville, Florida also experienced a decrease in value of $0.4 million due to higher replacement reserve expenses, higher operating expense projections, and slightly lower market rent estimates. Occupancy at the Atlanta, Georgia complex increased from 83% at December 31, 2001 to 90% at December 31, 2002. Occupancy at the Raleigh, North Carolina complex increased from 82% at December 31, 2001 to 88% at December 31, 2002. Occupancy at the apartment complex in Jacksonville, Florida increased from 88% at December 31, 2001 to 90% at December 31, 2002. Occupancy at the Gresham and Salem, Oregon apartment complexes decreased from 93% at December 31, 2001 to 92% at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002, all available vacant units were being marketed. RETAIL PROPERTIES Net investment income for the Partnership's retail properties was approximately $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, and approximately $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase in the year-to-date net investment income for the retail sector is primarily due to the May 2001 acquisition of the retail center located in Hampton, Virginia and the November 2002 acquisition of the retail center located in Ocean City, Maryland. The retail properties experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and a net unrealized loss of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The retail center located in Roswell, Georgia experienced a net unrealized loss of $1.7 million for the twelve months of 2002 due to the risk that a major tenant would not renew its lease, coupled with lower market rents. Partially offsetting this loss, the retail center located in Hampton, Virginia experienced an unrealized gain of $0.9 million due to the addition of 20,000 rentable square feet and an increase in occupancy. The retail properties experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. The retail center located in Roswell, Georgia experienced a loss of $0.6 million for 2001 due to increased capital expenditures and a slight drop in occupancy. Offsetting this unrealized loss was an unrealized gain of $0.5 million resulting from the market value appraisal received on the newly acquired retail center located in Hampton, Virginia. Occupancy at the retail center in Hampton, Virginia remained unchanged at 100% at December 31, 2001 and 2002. Occupancy at the shopping center located in Roswell, Georgia increased from 92% at December 31, 2001 to 93% at December 31, 2002. Occupancy at the retail center in Ocean City, Maryland was 99% at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002, all vacant spaces were being marketed. 15 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES Net investment income from property operations for the industrial properties increased from $0.5 million for year ended December 31, 2001 to $1.4 million for the corresponding period ended December 31, 2002. The majority of this increase was due to higher revenues at the properties located in Bolingbrook, Illinois and Salt Lake City, Utah. On September 12, 2002 the industrial property located in Bolingbrook, Illinois was sold for a realized gain of $0.4 million. Average occupancy for the Bolingbrook, Illinois industrial property was 24% and 79% for the year ended December 31, 2001 and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. The industrial properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized gain of approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to a net unrealized loss of approximately $2.1 million in 2001. The majority of the unrealized gain in 2002 was attributable to the Aurora, Colorado industrial property. This gain of approximately $0.5 million was due to an increase in market rents. Offsetting this unrealized gain was the Salt Lake City, Utah facility, which experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.3 million due to capital expenditures at the property that were not reflected as an increase in market value and softening market conditions. The three industrial properties owned by the Partnership experienced a net unrealized loss of approximately $2.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. The majority of the unrealized loss in 2001 was attributable to the Salt Lake City, Utah industrial property. This loss of approximately $1.3 million was due to a decrease in market rents. The Bolingbrook, Illinois facility experienced a loss of $0.9 million due to a decrease in rental rates and softening market conditions. The occupancy at the Salt Lake City, Utah property remained unchanged at 77% at December 31, 2001 and 2002. The Aurora, Colorado property's occupancy rate remained unchanged at 75% at December 31, 2001 and 2002. As of December 31, 2002, all vacant spaces were being marketed. EQUITY IN INCOME OF REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP During the year ended December 31, 2002, income from the investment located in Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri amounted to $0.3 million, a decrease of 59.8% from $0.7 million at December 31, 2001. The decrease in the year-to-date equity in income of real estate partnership is due to a decrease in revenue associated with expansion of the existing grocery store anchor that commenced during the fourth quarter 2001. It is anticipated that upon completion, both occupancy and rental rates will increase. The equity investment experienced a net unrealized loss of $0.6 million and a net unrealized gain of $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The unrealized loss of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 was primarily due to renovations from the expansion of the existing grocery store anchor that have not been reflected yet in the market value of the property. The unrealized gain of $0.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 was primarily due to the addition of a tenant that will provide a substantial amount of income to the center in rent and the addition of new space to house this tenant. The retail portfolio located in Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri had an average occupancy of 90% at December 31, 2001, which decreased to 87% at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002, all vacant spaces were being marketed. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS The Partnership's investment in REITS was liquidated at the end of the fourth quarter of 2001. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2001, the Partnership's remaining investment in REITS recognized a realized loss of $0.2 million due to the sale of the Partnership's remaining investment in REITs. OTHER Other net investment income increased $0.1 million during the year of 2002 compared to the corresponding period in 2001. Other net investment income includes interest income from short-term investments, investment management fees, and expenses not related to property activities. The increase in 2002 is primarily due to an increase in interest income from short-term investments offset by a decrease in management fees due to the Partnership's liquidation of its entire investment in REIT shares. 16 (c) INFLATION The Partnership's leases with a majority of its commercial tenants provide for recoveries of expenses based upon the tenant's proportionate share of, and/or increases in, real estate taxes and certain operating costs, which may reduce the Partnership's exposure to increases in operating costs resulting from inflation. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Management, on an ongoing basis, reviews critical estimates and assumptions. If management determines, as a result of its consideration of facts and circumstances that modifications in assumptions and estimates are appropriate, results of operations and financial position as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements may change significantly. The following sections discuss critical accounting policies applied in preparing our financial statements that are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions. VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS--The Partnership's investments in real estate are initially valued at their purchase price. Thereafter, real estate investments are reported at their estimated market values based upon appraisal reports prepared by independent real estate appraisers (members of the Appraisal Institute or an equivalent organization) within a reasonable amount of time following acquisition of the real estate and no less frequently than annually thereafter. The Chief Real Estate Appraiser of Prudential Investment Management is responsible to assure that the valuation process provides objective and accurate market value estimates. The purpose of an appraisal is to estimate the market value of real estate as of a specific date. Market value has been defined as the most probable price for which the appraised real estate will sell in a competitive market under all conditions requisite for a fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. Real estate partnerships are valued at the Partnership's equity in net assets as reflected in the partnership's financial statements with properties valued as described above. As described above, the estimated market value of real estate and real estate related assets is determined through an appraisal process. These estimated market values may vary significantly from the prices at which the real estate investments would sell since market prices of real estate investments can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. Although the estimated market values represent subjective estimates, management believes these estimated market values are reasonable approximations of market prices and the aggregate value of investments in real estate is fairly presented as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. OTHER ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate Risk. The Partnership's exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates to about 34.59% of its investment portfolio consisting primarily of short-term fixed rate commercial paper and fixed and variable interest rate debt. The Partnership does not use derivative financial instruments. By policy, the Partnership places its investments with high quality debt security issuers, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer, limits duration by restricting the term, and holds investments to maturity except under rare circumstances. 17 The table below presents the amounts and related weighted interest rates of the Partnership's cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 31, 2003:

ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AVERAGE MATURITY (IN $ MILLIONS) INTEREST RATE -------------------------------------------------------------- Cash equivalents......................... 0-3 months $18.9 0.94%

The table below discloses the Partnership's fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2003. All of the Partnership's long-term debt bears interest at fixed rates and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. On October 9, 2003 the Partnership refinanced its variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 4.34%. The following table presents principal cash flows (in thousands) based upon maturity dates of the debt obligations and the related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the fixed rate debt.

DEBT (IN $ THOUSANDS), ESTIMATED INCLUDING CURRENT PORTION 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 THEREAFTER TOTAL FAIR VALUE ------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- Average Fixed Interest Rate...... 5.85% 5.83% 5.28% 5.26% 5.04% 6.75% 7.52% Fixed Rate....................... $719 $774 $8,479 $588 $26,091 $7,284 $43,935 $42,869 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Mortgage Loans Payable..... $719 $774 $8,479 $588 $26,091 $7,284 $43,935 $42,869 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Partnership is exposed to market risk from tenants. While the Partnership has not experienced any significant credit losses, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in losses to the Partnership, which would adversely affect its operating results and liquidity. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The financial statements and supplementary data are listed in the accompanying Index to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on F-1. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES In order to ensure that the information we must disclose in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company's management, including our President and Chief Accounting Officer, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of December 31, 2003. Based on such evaluation, the President and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2003, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2003, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 18 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT NAME POSITION AGE ----- ------- ---- Vivian L. Banta Chairman of the Board 53 James J. Avery, Jr. Vice Chairman of the Board and Director 52 Andrew J. Mako President and Director 47 Richard J. Carbone Director 56 Helen M. Galt Director 56 Ronald P. Joelson Director 45 David R. Odenath, Jr. Director 47 C. Edward Chaplin Senior Vice President and Treasurer 47 Shirley H. Shao Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary 49 William J. Eckert, IV Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer 41 Charles A. McGee Vice President and Comptroller 55 Clifford E. Kirsch Chief Legal Counsel and Secretary 44 James Drozanowski Senior Vice President 61 Thomas F. Higgins Senior Vice President 50 Esther H. Milnes Senior Vice President 53 James M. O'Connor Senior Vice President 48 Melody C. McDaid Senior Vice President 54 VIVIAN L. BANTA is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. She was President of the Company through February 11, 2003. She has been Executive Vice President of the Prudential Insurance Division since 2000. From 1998 to 1999 she was a Consultant for Individual Financial Services. JAMES J. AVERY, JR. is Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Avery has been President, Prudential Insurance Division since 1998. ANDREW J. MAKO is President and Director of the Company as of February 12, 2003. Mr. Mako has been Vice President, Finance, Prudential Insurance Division since 1999. From 1996 to 1998, he was Vice President for the Business Performance Management Group of Prudential. RICHARD J. CARBONE has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential since 1997. HELEN M. GALT has been a Company Actuary for Prudential since 1993. RONALD P. JOELSON has been Senior Vice President, Prudential Asset, Liability and Risk Management since 1999. From 1996 to 1999, he was President of Guaranteed Products, Prudential Institutional. DAVID R. ODENATH, JR. has been President, Annuities since 2003. From 1999 to 2003, he was President of Prudential Investments. Prior to joining Prudential in 1999, Mr. Odenath was Senior Vice President and Director of Sales for the Investment Consulting Group at Paine Webber. C. EDWARD CHAPLIN has been Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Prudential since 2000. Prior to 2000, he was Vice President and Treasurer of Prudential. SHIRLEY H. SHAO has been Vice President and Associate Actuary, Prudential since 1996. WILLIAM J. ECKERT, IV, was elected Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company in June 2000. Mr. Eckert has been Vice President, Prudential Insurance Division Controllers since May 1995. CLIFFORD E. KIRSCH has been Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the Company since 1995. Mr. Kirsch joined Prudential Insurance Company of America in 1995 as Chief Counsel, Variable Products. THOMAS F. HIGGINS has been Vice President of Annuity Services in the Prudential Insurance Division since 1999. From 1998 to 1999 he was Vice President of Mutual Funds, Prudential Individual Financial Services. ESTHER H. MILNES has been Vice President and Chief Actuary, Prudential Insurance Division since 1999. From 1996 to 1999 she was Vice President and Actuary of Prudential U.S. Consumer Group 19 JAMES M. O'CONNOR is Senior Vice President and Actuary for the Company. Mr. O'Connor has been Vice President, Guaranteed Products since 2001. From 1998 to 2000 he was Corporate Vice President of Guaranteed Products. MELODY C. MCDAID is Senior Vice President. She has been Vice President and Site Executive, Prudential Financial Services Customer Service Office since 1995. The business address of all directors and officers of Pruco Life of New Jersey (PLNJ) is 213 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102-2992. PLNJ directors and officers are elected annually. CODE OF ETHICS We have adopted a policy, known as Making the Right Choices, which applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and our controller, as well as to our directors. Making the Right Choices contains a code of ethics, which is posted on our website at www.investor.prudential.com. Our code of ethics, any amendments and any waiver under our code of ethics granted to any of our directors or executive officers will be available free of charge on our website at www.investor.prudential.com. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The Real Property Account does not pay any fees, compensation or reimbursement to any Director or Officer of the Registrant. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Not applicable. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS See Related Transactions in Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements of the Partnership on page F-21. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Prudential Financial (the "Audit Committee") has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors of Prudential Financial and certain of its domestic and international subsidiaries, including the Company. The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring its pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor. The specific information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the section entitled "Item 2 - Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors" in Prudential Financial's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 8, 2004, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the year ended December 31, 2003. 20 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: 1. Financial Statements See the Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page F-1. 2. Financial Statement Schedules The following financial statement schedules of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership should be read in conjunction with the financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: Schedule III. Real Estate Owned: Properties Schedule III. Real Estate Owned: Interest in Properties See the Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page F-1. 3. Documents Incorporated by Reference See the following list of exhibits. 4. Exhibits See the following list of exhibits. (b) None. (c) The following is a list of Exhibits to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The Registrant will furnish a copy of any Exhibit listed below to any security holder of the Registrant who requests it upon payment of a fee of 15 cents per page. All Exhibits are either contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated by reference as indicated below. 3.1 Amended Articles of Incorporation of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey filed as Exhibit 1.A.(6)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 17 to Form S-6, Registration Statement No. 2-89780, filed March 1, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 Amended By-Laws of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, filed as Exhibit 1.A.(6)(b) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to Form S-6, Registration Statement No. 2-89780, filed March 1, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference. 3.3 Resolution of the Board of Directors establishing the Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account, filed as Exhibit (3C) to Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 33-20018, filed February 5, 1988, and incorporated herein by reference. 4.1 Variable Life Insurance Contract filed as Exhibit A(5) to Form N-8B-2, Registration Statement No. 2-81243, filed January 10, 1983, and incorporated herein by reference. 4.2 Revised Variable Appreciable Life Insurance Contract with fixed death benefit, filed as Exhibit 1.A.(5)(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-6, Registration Statement No. 2-89780, filed July 11, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference. 4.3 Revised Variable Appreciable Life Insurance Contract with variable death benefit, filed as Exhibit 1.A.(5)(d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-6, Registration Statement No. 2-89780, filed July 11, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference. 4.4 Single Premium Variable Annuity Contract, filed as Exhibit 4(i) to Form N-4, Registration Statement No. 2- 99616, filed August 13, 1985, and incorporated herein by reference. 4.5 Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Contract, filed as Exhibit 1.A.(5) to Form S-6, Registration Statement No. 2-99537, filed August 8, 1985, and incorporated herein by reference. 9. None. 21 10.1 Investment Management Agreement between Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership, filed as Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 33-20083-01, filed April 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.2 Service Agreement between The Prudential Insurance Company of America and The Prudential Investment Corporation, filed as Exhibit (10B) to Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 33-8698, filed September 12, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.3 Partnership Agreement of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership filed as Exhibit (10C) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 33-20018, filed April 6, 1990, and incorporated herein by reference. 11. Not applicable. 12. Not applicable. 16. None. 18. None. 22. Not applicable. 23. None. 24. Filed herewith as Exhibit 24. 27. Not applicable. 31.1 Certification of President required pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer required pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of President required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 22 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY IN RESPECT OF PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (REGISTRANT) Date: March 29, 2004 By: /s/ Andrew J. Mako -------------- -------------------------- Andrew J. Mako President and Director Date: March 29, 2004 By: /s/ William J. Eckert, IV -------------- -------------------------- William J. Eckert, IV Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE --------- ----- ---- * Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- James J. Avery, Jr. * Chairman and Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- Vivian L. Banta * Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- Richard J. Carbone * Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- Helen M. Galt * Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- David R. Odenath, Jr. * Director March 29, 2004 ------------------------------- Ronald P. Joelson *BY: /s/ Thomas C. Castano --------------------- THOMAS C. CASTANO (ATTORNEY-IN-FACT) 23 PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT (REGISTRANT) INDEX

PAGE ---- A. PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT Financial Statements: Report of Independent Auditors...................................................................... F-2 Statements of Net Assets--December 31, 2003 and 2002................................................. F-3 Statements of Operations--Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001.................................. F-3 Statements of Changes in Net Assets--Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001....................... F-3 Notes to Financial Statements ...................................................................... F-4 B. THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP Financial Statements: Report of Independent Auditors...................................................................... F-9 Report of Independent Auditors on Financial Statement Schedules..................................... F-10 Statements of Assets and Liabilities--December 31, 2003 and 2002..................................... F-11 Statements of Operations--Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001............................... F-12 Statements of Changes in Net Assets--Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 ................... F-13 Statements of Cash Flows--Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001............................... F-14 Schedule of Investments--December 31, 2003 and 2002.................................................. F-15 Notes to Financial Statements....................................................................... F-17 Financial Statement Schedules: For the period ended December 31, 2003 Schedule III--Real Estate Owned: Properties ............................................................. F-23 Schedule III--Real Estate Owned: Interest in Properties ................................................. F-24

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. F-1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS To the Contract Owners of the Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and the Board of Directors of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey In our opinion, the accompanying statements of net assets and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of shares at December 31, 2003 with The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York March 26, 2004 F-2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS December 31, 2003 and 2002

2003 2002 --------- --------- ASSETS Investment in The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership .............................. $ 7,846,237 $ 8,854,905 ----------- ----------- Net Assets................................................. $ 7,846,237 $ 8,854,905 =========== =========== NET ASSETS, representing: Equity of contract owners ................................. $ 5,852,959 $5,818,363 Equity of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ...... 1,993,278 3,036,542 ----------- ----------- $ 7,846,237 $ 8,854,905 =========== =========== Units outstanding............................................. 3,519,859 4,041,055 =========== =========== Portfolio shares held......................................... 318,217 367,199 Portfolio net asset value per share........................... $ 24.66 $ 24.11

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

2003 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- INVESTMENT INCOME Net investment income from Partnership operations ............................ $ 505,887 $ 489,257 $ 545,240 ----------- ----------- ----------- EXPENSES Charges to contract owners for assuming mortality risk and expense risk and for administration ....................................... 33,146 33,639 34,149 ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INVESTMENT INCOME ........................................................ 472,741 455,618 511,091 ----------- ----------- ----------- NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments in Partnership ........... (328,761) (400,009) (99,669) Realized gain (loss) on sale of investments in Partnership ................... 22,215 17,722 (9,345) ----------- ----------- ----------- NET GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS ............................................... (306,546) (382,287) (109,014) ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS ................................................. $ 166,195 $ 73,331 $ 402,077 =========== =========== =========== STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 2003 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- OPERATIONS Net investment income ........................................................ $ 472,741 $ 455,618 $ 511,091 Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments in Partnership ........... (328,761) (400,009) (99,669) Net realized gain (loss) on sale of investments in Partnership ............... 22,215 17,722 (9,345) ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS ................................................. 166,195 73,331 402,077 ----------- ----------- ----------- CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS Net withdrawals by contract owners ........................................... (60,848) (139,939) (233,080) Net contributions (withdrawals) by Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ..................................................... (1,114,015) 173,578 (609,906) ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS ....................................... (1,174,863) 33,639 (842,986) ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS ...................................... (1,008,668) 106,970 (440,909) NET ASSETS Beginning of year ......................................................... 8,854,905 8,747,935 9,188,844 ----------- ----------- ----------- End of year ............................................................... $ 7,846,237 $ 8,854,905 $ 8,747,935 =========== =========== ===========

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-3 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT DECEMBER 31, 2003 NOTE 1: GENERAL Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account ("Real Property Account") was established on October 30, 1987 by resolution of the Board of Directors of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ("Pruco Life of New Jersey"), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. ("PFI") as a separate investment account pursuant to New Jersey law. The assets of the Real Property Account are segregated from Pruco Life of New Jersey's other assets. The Real Property account is used to fund benefits under certain variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts issued by Pruco Life of New Jersey. These products are Appreciable Life ("VAL"), Variable Life ("VLI"), Discovery Plus ("SPVA"), and Discovery Life Plus ("SPVL"). The assets of the Real Property Account are invested in The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Partnership"). The Partnership is organized under New Jersey law and is registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership is the investment vehicle for assets allocated to the real estate investment option under certain variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The Real Property Account, along with the Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account, are the sole investors in the Partnership. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Partnership. The Partnership has a policy of investing at least 65% of its assets in direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate and participating mortgage loans. NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The accompanying financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. B. INVESTMENT IN PARTNERSHIP INTEREST The investment in the Partnership is based on the Real Property Account's proportionate interest of the Partnership's market value. At December 31, 2003 and 2002 the Real Property Account's interest in the Partnership was 4.3% or 318,217 shares and 4.8% or 367,199 shares respectively. C. INCOME RECOGNITION Net investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized daily. Amounts are based upon the Real Property Account's proportionate interest in the Partnership. D. EQUITY OF PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY Pruco Life of New Jersey maintains a position in the Real Property Account for property acquisitions and capital expenditure funding needs. The position is also utilized for liquidity purposes including unit purchases and redemptions, Partnership share transactions, and expense processing. The position does not have an effect on the contract owner's account or the related unit value. F-4 NOTE 3: TAXES Pruco Life of New Jersey is taxed as a "life insurance company" as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. The results of operations of the Real Property Account form a part of PFI's consolidated federal tax return. Under current federal law, no federal income taxes are payable by the Real Property Account. As such, no provision for the tax liability has been recorded in these financial statements. NOTE 4: NET WITHDRAWALS BY CONTRACT OWNERS Contract owner activity for the real estate investment option in Pruco Life of New Jersey's variable insurance and variable annuity products for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:

2003: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL TOTAL ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Contract Owner Net Payments: $ 325,435 $ 66,854 $ 0 $ 0 $ 392,289 Policy Loans: (96,224) 6,196 0 (1,166) (91,194) Policy Loan Repayments and Interest: 150,021 11,474 0 1,501 162,996 Surrenders, Withdrawals, and Death Benefits: (209,965) (48,272) (6,000) 0 (264,237) Net Transfers To Other Subaccounts or Fixed Rate Option: 5,501 847 (17,828) 0 (11,480) Administrative and Other Charges: (213,640) (34,797) 0 (785) (249,222) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net Withdrawals by Contract Owners $ (38,872) $ 2,302 $ (23,828) $ (450) $ (60,848) ========= ========= ========= ========= =========

2002: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL TOTAL ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Contract Owner Net Payments: $ 342,282 $ 62,548 $ 0 $ 9 $ 404,839 Policy Loans: (134,116) (11,582) 0 (1,524) (147,222) Policy Loan Repayments and Interest: 130,162 9,722 0 1,741 141,625 Surrenders, Withdrawals, and Death Benefits: (237,764) (32,072) 0 (112) (269,948) Net Transfers To Other Subaccounts or Fixed Rate Option: (26,640) 14,945 0 (4,840) (16,535) Administrative and Other Charges: (218,522) (33,382) 0 (794) (252,698) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- NET WITHDRAWALS BY CONTRACT OWNERS $(144,598) $ 10,179 $ 0 $ (5,520) $(139,939) ========= ========= ========= ========= =========

2001: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL TOTAL ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ Contract Owner Net Payments: $ 336,090 $ 66,216 $ 0 $ (91) $ 402,215 Policy Loans: (134,830) (10,374) 0 (3,283) (148,487) Policy Loan Repayments and Interest: 133,164 11,187 0 1,484 145,835 Surrenders, Withdrawals, and Death Benefits: (241,766) (46,572) 0 (24,418) (312,756) Net Transfers To Other Subaccounts or Fixed Rate Option: (69,664) 157 0 0 (69,507) Administrative and Other Charges: (217,519) (32,032) 0 (829) (250,380) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- NET WITHDRAWALS BY CONTRACT OWNERS $(194,525) $ (11,418) $ 0 $ (27,137) $(233,080) ========= ========= ========= ========= =========

F-5 NOTE 5: UNIT ACTIVITY Transactions in units for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:

2003: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL -------- ------- ------ ------- Company Contributions: 134,817 Contract Owner Contributions: 219,562 38,081 0 765 Company Redemptions: (626,880) Contract Owner Redemptions: (237,355) (37,038) (12,153) (993) 2002: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL -------- ------- ------ ------- Company Contributions: 158,361 Contract Owner Contributions: 211,561 38,915 0 5,731 Company Redemptions: (69,438) Contract Owner Redemptions: (278,286) (34,428) (2) (8,453) 2001: ----- VAL VLI SPVA SPVL -------- ------- ------ ------- Company Contributions: 200,991 Contract Owner Contributions: 216,764 35,917 0 755 Company Redemptions: (471,389) Contract Owner Redemptions: (307,592) (41,111) 0 (14,895)

NOTE 6: PURCHASES AND SALES OF INVESTMENTS The aggregate costs of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments in the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:

DECEMBER 31, 2003 DECEMBER 31, 2002 DECEMBER 31, 2001 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- PURCHASES: $0 $0 $0 SALES: $(1,208,010) $0 $(877,136)

NOTE 7: FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (the "Company" or "Prudential") sells a number of variable annuity and variable life insurance products. These products have unique combinations of features and fees that are charged against the contract owner's account balance. Differences in the fee structures result in a variety of unit values, expense ratios and total returns. The following table was developed by determining which products offered by Pruco Life of New Jersey have the lowest and highest total expense ratio. The summary may not reflect the minimum and maximum contract charges offered by the Company as contract owners may not have selected all available and applicable contract options as discussed in Note 1. The table reflects contract owner units only.

EXPENSE TOTAL UNITS UNIT VALUE NET ASSETS INVESTMENT RATIO** RETURN*** (000'S) LOWEST-HIGHEST (000'S) INCOME RATIO* LOWEST-HIGHEST LOWEST-HIGHEST ----- ------------ ------- --------- ----------- ---------- December 31, 2003 2,618 $1.99197 to $2.32279 $5,853 5.77% 0.35% to 1.25% 0.98% to 1.89% December 31, 2002 2,647 $1.97263 to $2.27966 $5,818 5.59% 0.35% to 1.25% -0.03% to 0.87% December 31, 2001 2,712 $1.97316 to $2.26011 $5,922 5.89% 0.35% to 1.25% 3.50% to 4.42%

The table above reflects information for units held by contract owners. Pruco Life of New Jersey also maintains a position in the Real Property Account, to provide for property acquisitions and capital expenditure funding needs. Pruco Life of New Jersey held 901,523, 1,393,587 and 1,304,664 units representing $1,993,278, $3,036,542 and $2,826,338 of net assets as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Charges for mortality risk, expense risk and administrative expenses are used by Pruco Life of New Jersey to purchase additional units in its account resulting in no impact to its net assets. * This amount represents the proportionate share of the net investment income from the underlying Partnership divided by the total average assets of the Account. This ratio excludes those expenses, such as mortality and expense charges, that result in direct reductions in the unit values. ** These ratios represent the annualized contract expenses of the separate account, consisting primarily of mortality and expense charges, for each period indicated. The ratios include only those expenses that result in a direct reduction to unit values. Charges made directly to contract owner accounts through the redemption of units and expenses of the underlying Partnership are excluded. F-6 *** These amounts represent the total return for the periods indicated, including changes in the value of the underlying Partnership, and reflect deductions for all items included in the expense ratio. The total return does not include any expense assessed through the redemption of units; inclusion of these expenses in the calculation would result in a reduction in the total return presented. CHARGES AND EXPENSES A. MORTALITY RISK AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGES Mortality risk and expense risk charges are determined daily using an effective annual rate of 0.6%, 0.35%, 0.9% and 0.9% for VAL, VLI, SPVA, SPVL, respectively. Mortality risk is that life insurance contract owners may not live as long as estimated or annuitants may live longer than estimated and expense risk is that the cost of issuing and administering the policies may exceed related charges by Pruco Life of New Jersey. The mortality risk and expense risk charges are assessed through reduction in unit values. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES Administrative charges are determined daily using an effective annual rate of 0.35% applied daily against the net assets representing equity of contract owners held in each subaccount for SPVA and SPVL. Administrative charges include costs associated with issuing the contract, establishing and maintaining records, and providing reports to contract owners. The administrative charge is assessed through reduction in unit values. C. COST OF INSURANCE AND OTHER RELATED CHARGES Contract owner contributions are subject to certain deductions prior to being invested in the Real Property Account. The deductions for VAL and VLI are (1) state premium taxes; (2) sales charges, not to exceed 5% for VAL and 9% for VLI, which are deducted in order to compensate Pruco Life of New Jersey for the cost of selling the contract and (3) transaction costs, applicable to VAL, are deducted from each premium payment to cover premium collection and processing costs. Contracts are also subject to monthly charges for the costs of administering the contract to compensate Pruco Life of New Jersey for the guaranteed minimum death benefit risk. These charges are assessed through the redemption of units. D. DEFERRED SALES CHARGE Subsequent to a contract owner redemption, a deferred sales charge is imposed upon surrenders of certain variable life insurance contracts to compensate Pruco Life of New Jersey for sales and other marketing expenses. The amount of any sales charge will depend on the number of years that have elapsed since the contract was issued but will not exceed 45% for VAL and 9% for SPVL. No sales charge will be imposed after the sixth and tenth year of the contract for SPVL and VAL, respectively. No sales charge will be imposed on death benefits. A deferred sales charge is assessed through the redemption of units. E. PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL CHARGE A charge is imposed by Pruco Life of New Jersey on partial withdrawals of the cash surrender value for VAL. A charge equal to the lesser of $15 or 2% will be made in connection with each partial withdrawal of the cash surrender value of a contract. A charge is assessed through the redemption of units. NOTE 8: RELATED PARTY Prudential and its affiliates perform various services on behalf of the Partnership in which the Account invests and may receive fees for the services performed. These services include, among other things, shareholder communications, preparation, postage, fund transfer agency and various other record keeping and customer service functions. F-7 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS To the Partners of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership: In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of real estate investments, and the related statements of operations, of changes in net assets and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Partnership") at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of The Prudential Insurance Company of America; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York February 17, 2004 F-8 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES To the Partners of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership: Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated February 17, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K also included an audit of the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, these financial statement schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York March 17, 2004 F-9 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------ 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ASSETS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS-- At estimated market value: Real estate and improvements (cost: 12/31/2003-- $223,943,870; 12/31/2002-- $215,592,277)............................................. $201,144,866 $196,631,183 Real estate partnership (cost: 12/31/2003-- $10,609,273; 12/31/2002-- $9,931,394)............................................... 8,721,319 8,978,324 Other real estate investments (cost: 12/31/2003-- $500,000; 12/31/2002--$0)........................................................ 500,000 -- ------------ ------------ Total real estate investments.......................................... 210,366,185 205,609,507 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................................................... 18,901,814 18,591,149 OTHER ASSETS, NET............................................................ 6,359,853 5,519,457 ------------ ------------ Total assets........................................................... $235,627,852 $229,720,113 ============ ============ LIABILITIES MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE....................................................... 43,934,494 35,699,108 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES........................................ 2,998,752 3,092,098 DUE TO AFFILIATES............................................................ 1,017,932 907,503 OTHER LIABILITIES............................................................ 947,110 911,245 MINORITY INTEREST............................................................ 5,086,503 4,756,653 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities...................................................... 53,984,791 45,366,607 ------------ ------------ COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES PARTNERS' EQUITY............................................................. 181,643,061 184,353,506 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and partners' equity................................. $235,627,852 $229,720,113 ============ ============ NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING AT END OF PERIOD................................ 7,366,835 7,644,848 ============ ============ SHARE VALUE AT END OF PERIOD................................................. $24.66 $24.11 ============ ============

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-10 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ------- ------- ------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Revenue from real estate and improvements................... $26,217,891 $26,345,500 $24,339,631 Equity in income of real estate partnership................. 560,660 276,209 686,801 Dividend income............................................. -- -- 2,157,647 Interest on short-term investments.......................... 281,943 455,339 296,514 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total investment income................................... 27,060,494 27,077,048 27,480,593 ----------- ----------- ----------- INVESTMENT EXPENSES: Operating................................................... 5,116,001 5,261,674 5,328,004 Investment management fee................................... 2,493,957 2,486,639 2,694,130 Real estate taxes........................................... 2,590,600 2,824,719 2,652,956 Administrative.............................................. 3,496,973 3,345,192 2,518,644 Interest expense............................................ 2,557,294 1,989,473 1,776,701 Minority interest........................................... 192,260 305,308 159,852 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total investment expenses................................. 16,447,085 16,213,005 15,130,287 ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INVESTMENT INCOME......................................... 10,613,409 10,864,043 12,350,306 ----------- ----------- ----------- REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS: Net proceeds from real estate investments sold.............. 5,689,488 6,282,075 53,417,000 Less: Cost of real estate investments sold.................. 6,620,263 9,101,381 50,300,836 Realization of prior years' unrealized gain (loss) on real estate investments sold............... (1,396,836) (3,212,838) 3,327,829 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net gain (loss) realized on real estate investments sold.......................................... 466,061 393,532 (211,665) ----------- ----------- ----------- Change in unrealized gain (loss) on real estate investments. (6,169,630) (8,739,488) (2,311,404) Less: Minority interest in unrealized gain (loss) on real estate investments................................... 763,795 171,707 24,680 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net unrealized gain (loss) on real estate investments....... (6,933,425) (8,911,195) (2,336,084) ----------- ----------- ----------- NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS.................................. (6,467,364) (8,517,663) (2,547,749) ----------- ----------- ----------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS............................................. $ 4,146,045 $ 2,346,380 $ 9,802,557 =========== =========== ===========

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-11 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ------------- ------------- ------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income .................................................... $ 10,613,409 $ 10,864,043 $ 12,350,306 Net gain (loss) realized on real estate investments sold ................. 466,061 393,532 (211,665) Net unrealized gain (loss) from real estate investments .................. (6,933,425) (8,911,195) (2,336,084) ------------- ------------- ------------- Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations .............. 4,146,045 2,346,380 9,802,557 ------------- ------------- ------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS: Withdrawals by partners (2003 --278,014; 2002 -- 672,622; and 2001-- 758,443 shares, respectively) ................................... (6,856,490) (16,143,510) (18,000,000) ------------- ------------- ------------- Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital transactions ................................ (6,856,490) (16,143,510) (18,000,000) ------------- ------------- ------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS .......................................... (2,710,445) (13,797,130) (8,197,443) NET ASSETS-- Beginning of period ........................................... 184,353,506 198,150,636 206,348,079 ------------- ------------- ------------- NET ASSETS-- End of period ................................................. $ 181,643,061 $ 184,353,506 $ 198,150,636 ============= ============= =============

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-12 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net increase in net assets from operations ............................. $ 4,146,045 $ 2,346,380 $ 9,802,557 Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets to net cash from operating activities Net realized and unrealized loss (gain) on real estate investments .......................................... 6,467,364 8,517,663 2,547,749 Amortization of deferred financing costs ........................... (523,586) (189,826) -- Distributions in excess of (less than) equity in income of real estate partnership operations ............................ 648,193 (53,459) (686,801) Minority interest in consolidated partnerships ..................... 192,260 305,308 159,852 Bad debt expense ................................................... 185,844 184,242 108,358 (Increase) decrease in: Dividend receivable .............................................. -- 20,802 213,886 Other assets ..................................................... (502,655) (2,246,510) (449,444) Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable and accrued expenses ............................ (93,346) (377,144) 951,424 Due to affiliates ................................................ 110,429 11,369 8,700 Other liabilities ................................................ 35,865 (61,165) 303,201 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities ................... 10,666,413 8,457,660 12,959,482 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Net proceeds from real estate investments sold ....................... 5,689,488 6,282,075 53,417,000 Acquisition of real estate investments ............................... (8,008,729) (2,610,723) (14,582,383) Additions to real estate and improvements ............................ (6,963,127) (2,629,708) (4,373,073) Contributions to real estate partnerships ............................ (1,326,071) (2,851,395) (353,956) Origination of other real estate investments ......................... (500,000) -- -- Acquisition of real estate investment trust .......................... -- -- (18,403,928) Sale of marketable securities, net ................................... -- -- 4,916,494 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities ................... (11,108,439) (1,809,751) 20,620,154 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Withdrawals by partners .............................................. (6,856,490) (16,143,510) (18,000,000) Principal payments on mortgage loans payable ......................... (514,614) (696,828) (437,588) Proceeds from mortgage loans payable ................................. 8,750,000 -- -- Distributions to minority interest partners .......................... (868,559) (100,528) -- Contributions from minority interest partners ........................ 242,354 2,268,461 929,776 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities ................... 752,691 (14,672,405) (17,507,812) ------------ ------------ ------------ NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ......................................................... 310,665 (8,024,496) 16,071,824 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-- Beginning of period ........................ 18,591,149 26,615,645 10,543,821 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-- End of period .............................. $ 18,901,814 $ 18,591,149 $ 26,615,645 ============ ============ ============

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-13 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

TOTAL RENTABLE SQUARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED PROPERTY NAME OWNERSHIP CITY, STATE (UNAUDITED) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS OFFICES 750 Warrenville WO Lisle, IL 92,478 Oakbrook Terrace WO Oakbrook, IL 107,610 Summit @ Cornell Oaks WO Beaverton , OR 72,109 Westpark WO Nashville, TN 97,036 Financial Plaza WO Brentwood, TN 742,931 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Offices % as of 12/31/03 27% APARTMENTS Brookwood Apartments WO Atlanta, GA 240 Units Dunhill Trace Apartments WO Raleigh, NC 250 Units Riverbend Apartments CJV Jacksonville, FL 458 Units SIMA Apartments CJV Gresham/Salem, OR 493 Units ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Apartments % as of 12/31/03 41% RETAIL King's Market WO Rosewell, GA 314,358 Hampton Towne Center WO Hampton, VA 174,540 White Marlin Mall CJV Ocean City, MD 186,016 Kansas City Portfolio EJV Kansas City, KS;MO 487,660 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Retail % as of 12/31/03 38% INDUSTRIAL Smith Road WO Aurora, CO 277,930 Walsh Higgins WO Salt Lake City, UT 182,500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Industrial % as of 12/31/03 6% HOTEL Portland Crown Plaza CJV Portland, OR 161 Rooms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hotel % as of 12/31/03 4% OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS Englar Lowes Loan NR Westminster, MD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Real Estate Investments % as of 12/31/03 0% TOTAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/03 116% ========

DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 -------------------------- ------------------------- ESTIMATED ESTIMATED MARKET MARKET PROPERTY NAME COST VALUE COST VALUE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS OFFICES 750 Warrenville $23,023,835 $12,110,725 $22,857,236 $13,854,988 Oakbrook Terrace 14,619,120 10,097,932 14,205,396 11,213,142 Summit @ Cornell Oaks 11,890,209 10,000,005 11,890,209 10,800,005 Westpark 10,423,727 9,239,260 10,320,613 9,651,831 Financial Plaza 9,837,482 6,700,041 9,826,195 7,709,345 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69,794,373 48,147,963 69,099,649 53,229,311 APARTMENTS Brookwood Apartments 15,781,263 17,000,000 15,715,772 17,523,063 Dunhill Trace Apartments 16,010,326 17,665,000 15,943,836 17,502,998 Riverbend Apartments 19,946,920 22,400,000 19,745,855 19,800,000 SIMA Apartments 19,281,738 17,975,000 18,838,570 18,600,000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 71,020,247 75,040,000 70,244,033 73,426,061 RETAIL King's Market 33,102,401 23,539,665 32,895,282 24,903,969 Hampton Towne Center 18,013,068 20,000,000 16,446,909 19,300,000 White Marlin Mall 13,198,649 15,900,000 10,012,138 10,012,138 Kansas City Portfolio 10,609,273 8,721,319 9,931,394 8,978,324 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 74,923,391 68,160,984 69,285,723 63,194,431 INDUSTRIAL Smith Road 10,806,403 10,508,509 10,294,784 10,557,058 Walsh Higgins -- -- 6,599,482 5,202,646 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10,806,403 10,508,509 16,894,266 15,759,704 HOTEL Portland Crown Plaza 8,008,729 8,008,729 -- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8,008,729 8,008,729 -- -- OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS Englar Lowes Loan 500,000 500,000 -- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 500,000 500,000 -- -- $235,053,143 $210,366,185 $225,523,671 $205,609,507 ============ ============ ============ ============

WO -- Wholly Owned Investment CJV -- Consolidated Joint Venture EJV -- Joint Venture Investment accounted for under the equity method NR -- Note Receivable F-14 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2003 DECEMBER 31, 2002 ------------------------- ------------------------ ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FACE AMOUNT COST MARKET VALUE COST MARKET VALUE ----------- ---- ------------ ---- ------------ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS........... 10.4% 10.1% Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.06%, February 4, 2004..... $ 5,974,000 $ 5,967,907 $ 5,967,907 $ -- $ -- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 0.88%, January 2, 2004...... 12,331,000 12,330,520 12,330,520 -- -- Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.00%, January 02, 2003..... 6,928,000 -- -- 6,927,615 6,927,615 Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.27%, January 17, 2003..... 1,218,000 -- -- 1,217,055 1,217,055 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 1.27%, January 21, 2003..... 3,461,000 -- -- 3,457,581 3,457,581 Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.27%, January 21, 2003..... 1,288,000 -- -- 1,286,819 1,286,819 Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.22%, February 10, 2003.... 1,000,000 -- -- 998,611 998,611 Federal National Mortgage Assoc., 1.22%, February 13, 2003.... 2,070,000 -- -- 2,066,913 2,066,913 Federal Farm Credit Banks, 1.22%, February 14, 2003........... 1,870,000 -- -- 1,867,148 1,867,148 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL CASH EQUIVALENTS........................................ 18,298,427 18,298,427 17,821,742 17,821,742 CASH...................................................... 603,387 603,387 769,407 769,407 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS........................... $18,901,814 $18,901,814 $18,591,149 $18,591,149 =========== =========== =========== ===========

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-15 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION On April 29, 1988, The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Partnership"), a general partnership organized under New Jersey law, was formed through an agreement among The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"), Pruco Life Insurance Company ("Pruco Life"), and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey ("Pruco Life of New Jersey"). The Partnership was established as a means by which assets allocated to the real estate investment option under certain variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts issued by the respective companies could be invested in a commingled pool. The partners in the Partnership are Prudential, Pruco Life and Pruco Life of New Jersey. The Partnership's policy is to invest at least 65% of its assets in direct ownership interests in income-producing real estate and participating mortgage loans. The estimated market value of the Partnership's shares is determined daily, consistent with the Partnership Agreement. On each day during which the New York Stock Exchange is open for business, the net asset value of the Partnership is estimated using the estimated market value of its assets, principally as described in Notes 2A and 2B below, reduced by any liabilities of the Partnership. The periodic adjustments to property values described in Notes 2A and 2B below and other adjustments to previous estimates are made on a prospective basis. There can be no assurance that all such adjustments to estimates will be made timely. Shares of the Partnership are held by The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account, Pruco Life Variable Contract Real Property Account and Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (the "Real Property Accounts") and may be purchased and sold at the then current share value of the Partnership's net assets. Share value is calculated by dividing the estimated market value of net assets of the Partnership as determined above by the number of shares outstanding. A contract owner participates in the Partnership through interests in the Real Property Accounts. Prudential Real Estate Investors ("PREI") is the real estate advisory unit of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. ("PIM"), which is an indirectly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial Inc. ("PFI"). PREI provides investment advisory services to the Partnership's partners pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement as described in Note 9. NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A: BASIS OF PRESENTATION--The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. It is the Partnership's policy to consolidate those real estate partnerships in which it has a controlling interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. B: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS--The Partnership's investments in real estate are initially valued at their purchase price. Thereafter, real estate investments are reported at their estimated market values based upon property appraisal reports prepared by independent real estate appraisers (members of the Appraisal Institute or an equivalent organization) within a reasonable amount of time following acquisition of the real estate and no less frequently than annually thereafter. The Chief Real Estate Appraiser of PIM is responsible to assure that the valuation process provides objective and accurate property market value estimates. American Appraisal Associates (the "Appraisal Management Firm"), an entity not affiliated with PIM, has been appointed by PIM to assist the Chief Real Estate Appraiser in maintaining and monitoring the objectivity and accuracy of the appraisal process. Unconsolidated real estate partnerships are valued at the Partnership's equity in net assets as reflected in the partnership's financial statements with properties valued as described above. F-16 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 As described above, the estimated market value of real estate and real estate related assets is determined through an appraisal process. These estimated market values may vary significantly from the prices at which the real estate investments would sell since market prices of real estate investments can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. Although the estimated market values represent subjective estimates, management believes these estimated market values are reasonable approximations of market prices and the aggregate value of investments in real estate is fairly presented as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. C: OTHER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS--Other real estate investments include notes receivable, which are valued at the amount due and approximate market value. D: REVENUE RECOGNITION--Revenue from real estate is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the respective leases. Revenue from certain real estate investments is net of all or a portion of related real estate expenses, as lease arrangements vary as to responsibility for payment of these expenses between tenants and the Partnership. Since real estate is stated at estimated market value, net income is not reduced by depreciation or amortization expense. E: EQUITY IN INCOME OF REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP--Equity in income from real estate partnership operations represents the Partnership's share of the current year's partnership income as provided for under the terms of the partnership agreements. As is the case with wholly-owned real estate, partnership net income is not reduced by depreciation or amortization expense. Frequency of distribution of income is determined by formal agreements or by the executive committee of the partnership. F: MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE--Mortgage loans payable are stated at the principal amount of the obligation outstanding. At times the Partnership may assume debt in connection with the purchase of real estate. At the time of the assumption, the Partnership allocates a portion of the purchase price to the below/above market debt and amortizes the premium/discount over the remaining life of the debt. G: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of investments in the Prudential Investment Liquidity Pool offered and managed by an affiliate of PFI and are accounted for at market value. H: OTHER ASSETS--Cash of $216,883 and $237,732 was maintained by the wholly owned and consolidated properties at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for tenant security deposits and is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Other assets are net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $76,800 and $69,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. I: MARKETABLE SECURITIES--Marketable securities are highly liquid investments with maturities of more than three months when purchased and are carried at estimated market value. J: FEDERAL INCOME TAXES--The Partnership is not a taxable entity under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The income and capital gains and losses of the Partnership are attributed, for federal income tax purposes, to the Partners in the Partnership. The Partnership may be subject to state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates. K: DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS--Included in Other Assets are deferred financing costs amounting to $313,425 and $637,980, which are net of accumulated amortization of $713,990 and $190,404 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and which are being amortized over the term of the related obligation. F-17 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 L: MANAGEMENT'S USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. M: NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS--In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, which rescinded Statement No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt". SFAS No. 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003, which had no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership. FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", ("FIN 46") was issued in January 2003. In December 2003, FASB issued a revised interpretation of FIN 46 ("FIN 46-R"), which supersedes FIN 46. FIN 46-R defers the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN-46 for those companies currently accounting for their investments in accordance with the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, "Audits of Investment Companies" ("the Audit Guide"). The effective date is delayed while the AICPA finalizes the proposed Statement of Position ("SOP") on the clarification of the scope of the Audit Guide. Following the issuance of the final SOP, the FASB will consider modifying FIN 46-R to provide an exception for companies that apply the Audit Guide. The Partnership is awaiting the final determination from the FASB in order to evaluate the extent in which, if any, its equity investments may need to be consolidated as a result of this FIN 46-R. NOTE 3: DISCLOSURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITY Cash paid for interest during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $2,462,387, $1,989,473, and $1,776,701, respectively. During the fourth quarter 2002, in conjunction with the acquisition of a real estate investment, the Partnership assumed mortgage loan financing of $7.4 million. During the first and second quarters of 2001, in conjunction with the acquisition of two real estate investments, the Partnership assumed mortgage loan financing of $9.0 million and $10.3 million, respectively. NOTE 4: REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP Real estate partnership is valued at the Partnership's equity in net assets as reflected by the partnership's financial statements with properties valued as indicated in Note 2B above. The partnership's combined financial position at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 are summarized as follows:

DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 ----------- ----------- Partnership Assets and Liabilities Real estate at estimated market value ....... $29,450,000 $31,300,000 Other assets ................................ 1,536,444 1,643,304 ----------- ----------- Total assets ................................ 30,986,444 32,943,304 ----------- ----------- Mortgage loans payable ...................... 18,833,958 20,389,498 Other liabilities ........................... 320,588 362,837 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities ........................... 19,154,546 20,752,335 ----------- ----------- Net Assets .................................. $11,831,898 $12,190,969 =========== =========== Partnership's Share of Net Assets .............. $ 8,721,319 $ 8,978,324 =========== ===========

F-18 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 2001 ---------- ---------- ---------- Partnership Operations Rental revenue .......................... $4,473,698 $4,170,038 $4,497,459 Real estate expenses and taxes .......... 3,751,112 3,717,425 3,536,948 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net Investment Income ................... $ 722,586 $ 452,613 $ 960,511 ========== ========== ========== Partnership's Share of Net Investment Income $ 560,660 $ 276,209 $ 686,801 ========== ========== ==========

NOTE 5: MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE: Debt includes mortgage loans payable as summarized below:

PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP DEBT DEBT AS AS OF 12/31/03 OF 12/31/02 AS OF 12/31/03 --------------------------- ---------- ----------------------------- PARTNERSHIP'S 100% LOAN SHARE OF 100% LOAN INTEREST MATURITY BALANCE LOAN BALANCE* BALANCE RATE** DATE TERMS*** ----------- ------------- ----------- --------- -------- --------- MORTGAGES OF WHOLLY OWNED PROPERTIES & CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS Jacksonville, FL ............................ $10,000,000 $ 8,976,000 $ 9,844,318 4.34% 2008 PP, I Gresham/Salem, OR ........................... 8,433,665 8,433,665 8,657,061 7.97% 2006 PP, P&I Hampton, VA ................................. 9,451,819 9,451,819 9,804,475 6.75% 2018 PP, P&I Ocean City, MD .............................. 7,299,010 4,291,818 7,393,254 7.24% 2008 PP, P&I Raleigh, NC ................................. 8,750,000 8,750,000 -- 3.09% 2008 PP, I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ....................................... $43,934,494 $39,903,302 $35,699,108 MORTGAGE LOANS ON EQUITY PARTNERSHIP Kansas City, MO - Ten Quivira ............... $ 6,775,930 $ 4,994,538 $ 6,864,726 8.16% 2007 PP, P&I Kansas City, MO- Ten Quivira Parcel ......... 974,750 718,488 987,524 8.16% 2007 PP, P&I Kansas City, MO - Cherokee Hill ............. 3,129,145 2,306,493 3,172,260 7.79% 2007 PP, P&I Kansas City, KS - Devonshire ................ 2,171,880 1,600,893 2,200,342 8.16% 2007 PP, P&I Kansas City, MO - Brywood Center ............ 5,782,253 4,262,099 5,858,028 8.16% 2007 PP, P&I Kansas City, MO - Willow Creek .............. -- -- 1,306,619 -- 2005 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total ....................................... $18,833,958 $13,882,510 $20,389,498 TOTAL MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE ................ $53,785,812 6.33%

* Represents the Partnership's interest in the loan based upon the estimated percentage of net assets which would be distributed to the Partnership if the partnership were liquidated at December 31, 2003. It does not represent the Partnership's legal obligation. ** The Partnership's weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2003 and 2002 were 6.33% and 6.42%, respectively. The weighted average interest rates were calculated using the Partnership's annualized interest expense for each loan (derived using the same percentage as that in (*) above) divided by the Partnership's share of total debt. *** Loan Terms PP=Prepayment penalties applicable to loan, I=Interest only, P&I=Principal and Interest On October 9, 2003 the Partnership refinanced its variable rate debt on the apartment investment located in Jacksonville, Florida to a fixed rate of 4.34%. The interest rate on the variable rate debt was previously adjusted annually. The rate was equal to the 6-month Treasury rate plus 1.565%. It was subject to a maximum of 11.345% and a minimum of 2.345%. On December 31, 2002, the interest rate on the variable rate debt was 3.235%. As of December 31, 2003, mortgage loans payable on wholly owned properties and consolidated partnerships are payable as follows: YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, (000'S) ------------------------ ------- 2004....................................................... $ 719 2005....................................................... 774 2006....................................................... 8,479 2007....................................................... 588 2008....................................................... 26,091 Thereafter................................................. 7,284 ------- Total...................................................... $43,935 ======= F-19 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 The mortgage loans payable are secured by real estate investments with an estimated market value of $93,875,000. As of December 31, 2003, principal amounts of mortgage loans payable on the equity partnership are payable as follows: 100% LOAN BALANCE PARTNERSHIP'S SHARE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, (000'S) (000'S) ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------ 2004................................ $ 268 $ 198 2005................................ 291 214 2006................................ 315 232 2007................................ 17,960 13,239 ------- ------- Total............................... $18,834 $13,883 ======= ======= Based on borrowing rates available to the Partnership at December 31, 2003 for loans with similar terms and average maturities, the Partnership's mortgages on wholly owned properties and consolidated partnerships have an estimated fair value of approximately $44.9 million and a carrying value of $43.6 million, which is net of deferred financing costs of $0.3 million. The Partnership's share of equity partnership debt has an estimated fair value of approximately $15.4 million and a carrying value of $13.9 million, which is net of deferred financing costs of $0. Different assumptions or changes in future market conditions could significantly affect estimated fair value. NOTE 6: CONCENTRATION OF RISK ON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS At December 31, 2003, the Partnership had real estate investments located throughout the United States. The diversification of the account's holdings based on the estimated market values and established NCREIF regions is as follows: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE REGION (000'S) REGION % ------ ---------- -------- Southeast ............................... $ 78,879 37% Mideast ................................. 54,065 26% Pacific ................................. 35,984 17% East North Central ...................... 22,209 11% Mountain ................................ 10,508 5% West North Central ...................... $ 8,721 4% -------- Total ................................... $210,366 ======== The above allocations are based on (1) 100% of the estimated market value of wholly-owned properties and consolidated joint ventures, and (2) the estimated market value of the Partnership's net equity in non-consolidated ventures. NOTE 7: LEASING ACTIVITY The Partnership leases space to tenants under various operating lease agreements. These agreements, without giving effect to renewal options, have expiration dates ranging from 2004 to 2023. At December 31, 2003, the aggregate future minimum base rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases for wholly owned and consolidated joint venture properties by year are as follows: YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, (000'S) ----------------------- ------- 2004...................................................... $10,344 2005...................................................... 9,626 2006...................................................... 8,716 2007...................................................... 8,142 2008...................................................... 7,155 Thereafter................................................ 18,120 ------- Total..................................................... $62,103 ======= F-20 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002, AND 2001 The above future minimum base rental payments exclude residential lease agreements, which accounted for 39.32% of the Partnership's 2003 annual rental income. NOTE 8: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES In 1986, Prudential committed to fund up to $100 million to enable the Partnership to acquire real estate investments. Contributions to the Partnership under this commitment have been utilized for property acquisitions, and were to be returned to Prudential on an ongoing basis from contract owners' net contributions and other available cash. The amount of the commitment has been reduced by $10 million for every $100 million in current value net assets of the Partnership. As of December 31, 2003, the cost basis of Prudential's equity interest in the Partnership under this commitment (held through the Real Property Accounts) was $44 million. Prudential did not make any contributions during the 2002 fiscal year and terminated this commitment on December 31, 2002. The Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. In the opinion of Prudential's management, the outcome of such matters will not have a significant effect on the Partnership. NOTE 9: OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Pursuant to an investment management agreement, PIM charges the Partnership a daily investment management fee at an annual rate of 1.25% of the average daily gross asset valuation of the Partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 management fees incurred by the Partnership were $2.5 million, $2.5 million, and $2.7 million for each of the three years, respectively. The Partnership also reimburses PIM for certain administrative services rendered by PIM. The amounts incurred for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $132,380; $132,380; and $118,972, respectively, and are classified as administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Partnership made the following distributions to the Partners: YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, (000'S) ------------------------ ------- 2003....................................................... $ 6,856 2002....................................................... 16,143 2001....................................................... 18,000 NOTE 10: FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- PER SHARE (UNIT) OPERATING PERFORMANCE: Net Asset Value, beginning of period .............................. $ 24.11 $ 23.82 $ 22.74 $ 20.86 $ 20.27 INCOME FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: Investment income, before management fee .......................... 1.71 1.63 1.66 1.67 1.52 Management fee .................................................... (0.33) (0.30) (0.30) (0.26) (0.26) Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments ............ (0.83) (1.04) (0.28) 0.47 (0.67) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations .............. 0.55 0.29 1.08 1.88 0.59 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD .................................... $ 24.66 $ 24.11 $ 23.82 $ 22.74 $ 20.86 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== TOTAL RETURN, BEFORE MANAGEMENT FEE (a): .......................... 3.63% 2.52% 6.14% 10.40% 4.22% RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: Net Assets, end of period (in millions) ........................... $ 182 $ 184 $ 198 $ 206 $ 210 Ratios to average net assets (b): Management Fee .................................................... 1.35% 1.28% 1.27% 1.28% 1.25% Investment Income, before Management Fee .......................... 7.12% 6.85% 7.11% 7.76% 7.30%

(a) Total Return, before management fee is calculated by geometrically linking quarterly returns which are calculated using the formula below: Net Investment Income + Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beg. Net Asset Value + Time Weighted Contributions - Time Weighted Distributions (b) Average net assets are based on beginning of quarter net assets. F-21 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE OWNED: PROPERTIES DECEMBER 31, 2003

INITIAL COSTS TO THE PARTNERSHIP COSTS ------------------------- CAPITALIZED ENCUMBRANCES BUILDING & SUBSEQUENT TO DESCRIPTION AT 12/31/03 LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION ------- ------------ --------- ------------ -------------- PROPERTIES: Office Building Lisle, IL ................. None 1,780,000 15,743,881 5,499,954 Garden Apartments Atlanta, GA .............. None 3,631,212 11,168,904 981,147(b) Retail Shopping Center Roswell, GA .............. None 9,454,622 21,513,677 2,134,102 Garden Apartments Raleigh, NC ............... 8,750,000 1,623,146 14,135,553 251,627 Office Building Brentwood, TN ............. None 1,797,000 6,588,451 2,038,276 Office Park Oakbrook Terrace, IL ...... None 1,313,310 11,316,883 1,988,927 Office Building Beaverton, OR ............. None 816,415 9,897,307 1,176,487 Industrial Building Salt Lake City, UT ....... None 582,457 4,805,676 1,211,349 Industrial Building Aurora, CO ................ None 1,338,175 7,202,411 2,265,817 Office Complex Brentwood, TN ............. None 2,425,000 7,063,755 348,727 Retail Shopping Center Hampton, VA................ 9,451,819 2,339,100 12,767,956 2,906,012 ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- 18,201,819 27,100,437 122,204,454 20,802,425 ========== ========== =========== ==========

GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED AT CLOSE OF YEAR ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING & 2003 YEAR OF DATE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SALES TOTAL (a)(b)(c) CONSTRUCTION ACQUIRED ---------- ------------ ------- --------------- ------------ ---------- Lisle, IL ................. 1,780,000 21,243,835 23,023,835 1985 Apr., 1988 Garden Apartments Atlanta, GA .............. 3,631,212 12,150,051 15,781,263 1987 Apr., 1988 Retail Shopping Center Roswell, GA .............. 9,462,951 23,639,450 33,102,401 1988 Jan., 1989 Garden Apartments Raleigh, NC ............... 1,623,146 14,387,180 16,010,326 1995 Jun., 1995 Office Building Brentwood, TN ............. 1,797,377 8,626,350 10,423,727 1982 Oct., 1995 Office Park Oakbrook Terrace, IL ...... 1,313,821 13,305,299 14,619,120 1988 Dec., 1995 Office Building Beaverton, OR ............. 845,887 11,044,322 11,890,209 1995 Dec., 1996 Industrial Building Salt Lake City, UT ....... 702,323 5,897,159 (6,599,482) 0 1997 Jul., 1997 Industrial Building Aurora, CO ................ 1,415,159 9,391,244 10,806,403 1997 Sep., 1997 Office Complex Brentwood, TN ............. 2,453,117 7,384,365 9,837,482 1987 Oct., 1997 Retail Shopping Center Hampton, VA................ 3,276,520 14,736,548 18,013,068 1998 May, 2001 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- 28,301,513 141,805,803 (6,599,482) 163,507,834 ========== =========== ========== ===========

2003 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- (a) Balance at beginning of year.... 150,548,805 158,410,798 154,613,404 Additions: Acquistions................... 0 0 0 Improvements, etc............. 1,545,443 1,231,735 3,797,394 Conversions from JV to WO..... 18,013,068 0 0 Deletions: Sale.......................... (6,599,482) (9,093,728) 0 ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at end of year.............. 163,507,834 150,548,805 158,410,798 =========== =========== ===========

(b) Net of $1,000,000 settlement received from lawsuit. F-22 THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE OWNED: INTEREST IN PROPERTIES DECEMBER 31, 2003

INITIAL COSTS TO THE PARTNERSHIP COSTS ----------------------------------------- CAPITALIZED ENCUMBRANCES BUILDING & SUBSEQUENT TO DESCRIPTION AT 12/31/03 LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION ----------- ------------ ---- ------------- -------------- INTEREST IN PROPERTIES: Garden Apartments Jacksonville, FL.................10,000,000 2,750,000 14,650,743 2,546,177 Retail Shopping Center Kansas City MO and KS*...........13,900,817 5,710,916 15,211,504 2,601,686 Garden Apartments Gresham/Salem, OR................ 8,433,665 3,063,000 15,318,870 899,868 Retail Shopping Center Hampton, VA...................... 0 2,339,100 12,767,956 1,339,852 Retail Shopping Center Ocean City, MD................... 7,299,010 1,517,099 8,495,039 3,186,511 Hotel Portland, OR..................... 0 1,500,000 6,508,729 0 ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- 39,633,492 16,880,115 72,952,841 10,574,094 ========== ========== ========== ==========

GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED AT CLOSE OF YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING & CONVERTED TO TOTAL YEAR OF DATE LAND IMPROVEMENTS WHOLLY OWNED (a)(b)(c) CONSTRUCTION ACQUIRED --------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------------- ------------ INTEREST IN PROPERTIES: Garden Apartments Jacksonville, FL................. 2,750,000 17,196,920 19,946,920 1973 Sept., 1999 Retail Shopping Center Kansas City MO and KS*........... 5,710,916 17,813,190 23,524,106 Various Ranging Sept., 1999 From 1972-1992 Garden Apartments Gresham/Salem, OR................ 3,063,000 16,218,738 19,281,738 Various Ranging Feb., 2001 From 1971-1983 Retail Shopping Center Hampton, VA...................... 3,276,520 13,170,388 (16,446,908) 0 1998 May, 2001 Retail Shopping Center Ocean City, MD................... 1,517,099 11,681,550 13,198,649 1986 Nov., 2002 Hotel Portland, OR..................... 1,500,000 6,508,729 8,008,729 1989 Dec., 2003 ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- 17,817,535 82,589,515 (16,446,908) 83,960,142 ========== ========== =========== ==========

2003 2002 2001 ------- ------- ------- (a) Balance at beginning of year. 74,974,865 60,659,900 25,121,329 Additions: Acquistions................ 8,008,729 10,012,138 33,488,926 Improvements, etc.......... 3,392,575 4,097,329 1,674,862 Deletions: Sale....................... 0 0 0 Conversions from JV to WO.. (16,446,908) Encumbrances on Joint Ventures accounted for by the equity method...... 1,116,048 205,498 374,783 ------------ ---------- ---------- Balance at end of year..... 71,045,309 74,974,865 60,659,900 ============ ========== ==========

* Partnership interest accounted for by the equity method. F-23