10-Q 1 a04-12976_110q.htm 10-Q

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.

 

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

 

OR

 

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number: 333-111553
 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nebraska

 

47-0221457

(State of Incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

2940 South 84th Street
Lincoln, Nebraska

 

68506

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  800/525-9287

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes  ý

 

No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Yes  o

 

No  ý

 

As of October 31, 2004, the registrant had 25,000 common shares, $100 par value, outstanding, all of which are held by Allstate Life Insurance Company

 

 



 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2004

 

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three-Month and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Statements of Financial Position as of September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and December 31, 2003

4

 

 

 

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)

5

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)

6

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

13

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

17

 

 

 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

17

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

17

 

2



 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Unaudited)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income

 

$

2,817

 

$

2,782

 

$

8,382

 

$

8,613

 

Realized capital gains and losses

 

5

 

(66

)

5

 

73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations before income tax expense

 

2,822

 

2,716

 

8,387

 

8,686

 

Income tax expense

 

986

 

948

 

2,929

 

3,033

 

Net income

 

$

1,836

 

$

1,768

 

$

5,458

 

$

5,653

 

 

See notes to condensed financial statements.

 

3



 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

 

(in thousands, except par value data)

 

September 30,
2004

 

December 31,
2003

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Investments

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities, at fair value (amortized cost $202,524 and $197,942)

 

$

212,297

 

$

209,118

 

Short-term

 

910

 

1,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

213,207

 

210,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

23,197

 

23,456

 

Reinsurance recoverable from Allstate Life Insurance Company, net

 

16,289,451

 

14,594,260

 

Reinsurance recoverable from non-affiliates, net

 

793,959

 

692,971

 

Current income taxes receivable

 

2,537

 

1,428

 

Other assets

 

69,949

 

69,968

 

Separate Accounts

 

2,124,638

 

1,911,619

 

Total assets

 

$

19,516,938

 

$

17,503,927

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds

 

$

15,463,022

 

$

13,802,815

 

Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits

 

1,604,843

 

1,476,314

 

Unearned premiums

 

22,299

 

19,974

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,670

 

4,172

 

Payable to affiliates, net

 

12,690

 

23,332

 

Other liabilities and accrued expenses

 

71,217

 

55,688

 

Separate Accounts

 

2,124,638

 

1,911,619

 

Total liabilities

 

19,302,379

 

17,293,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder’s equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $100 par value, 30 thousand shares authorized, 25 thousand shares issued and outstanding

 

2,500

 

2,500

 

Additional capital paid-in

 

130,305

 

130,305

 

Retained income

 

75,401

 

69,943

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

6,353

 

7,265

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

 

6,353

 

7,265

 

Total shareholder’s equity

 

214,559

 

210,013

 

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity

 

$

19,516,938

 

$

17,503,927

 

 

See notes to condensed financial statements.

 

4



 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,458

 

$

5,653

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization and other non-cash items

 

215

 

(46

)

Realized capital gains and losses

 

(5

)

(73

)

Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits and contractholder funds, net of reinsurance recoverables

 

(7,443

)

290

 

Income taxes payable

 

(1,120

)

22

 

Receivable/payable to affiliates, net

 

(10,642

)

(97,383

)

Other operating assets and liabilities

 

17,873

 

10,282

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

4,336

 

(81,255

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales

 

1,007

 

19,930

 

Investment collections

 

9,791

 

22,247

 

Investment purchases

 

(15,590

)

(53,239

)

Change in short-term investments

 

197

 

(480

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(4,595

)

(11,542

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash

 

(259

)

(92,797

)

Cash at beginning of period

 

23,456

 

130,249

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

23,197

 

$

37,452

 

 

See notes to condensed financial statements.

 

5



 

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

1.              Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying condensed financial statements include the accounts of Lincoln Benefit Life Company (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Allstate Life Insurance Company (“ALIC”), which is wholly owned by Allstate Insurance Company (“AIC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation (the “Corporation”).

 

The condensed financial statements and notes as of September 30, 2004, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited.  The condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods.  These condensed financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.  The results of operations for the interim periods should not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

 

Adopted accounting standards

 

Statement of Position 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”)

 

On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted SOP 03-1.  The major provisions of the SOP affecting the Company require:

 

                  Establishment of reserves primarily related to death benefit and income benefit guarantees provided under variable annuity contracts and annuitization guarantees on certain fixed annuities, all of which are ceded to ALIC;

 

                  Deferral of sales inducements that meet certain criteria, and amortization using the same method used for deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”), all of which are ceded to ALIC.

 

Effects of adoption

 

The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle from implementing SOP 03-1 was a loss of $26.9 million, after-tax ($41.4 million, pre-tax) that was ceded to ALIC under the terms of the reinsurance agreement.  It was comprised of increases in contractholder funds of $30.0 million, pre-tax, and reserves for life-contingent contract benefits of $11.4 million, pre-tax.

 

Liabilities for contract guarantees

 

The Company offers various guarantees to variable contractholders including a return of no less than (a) total deposits made on the contract less any customer withdrawals, (b) total deposits made on the contract less any customer withdrawals plus a minimum return or (c) the highest contract value on a specified anniversary date minus any customer withdrawals following the contract anniversary.  These guarantees include benefits that are payable in the event of death (death benefits), upon annuitization (income benefits), or at specified dates during the accumulation period (accumulation benefits).  These benefits are ceded to ALIC under the terms of the reinsurance agreement.

 

The table below presents information regarding the Company’s variable contracts with guarantees.  The Company’s variable annuity contracts may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract; therefore, the sum of amounts listed exceeds the total account balances of variable annuity contracts’ separate accounts with guarantees.

 

6



 

($ in millions)

 

September 30,
2004

 

 

 

 

 

In the event of death

 

 

 

Account value

 

$

1,634

 

Net amount at risk(1)

 

$

232

 

Average attained age of contractholders

 

60 years

 

At annuitization

 

 

 

Account value

 

$

362

 

Net amount at risk(2)

 

$

1

 

Weighted average waiting period until annuitization options available

 

4 years

 

Accumulation at specified dates

 

 

 

Account value

 

$

52

 

Net amount at risk(3)

 

$

 

Weighted average waiting period until guarantee date

 

13 years

 

 

(1)          Defined as the current guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance at the balance sheet date.

(2)          Defined as the present value of the minimum guaranteed annuity payments determined in accordance with the terms of the contract in excess of the current account balance.

(3)          Defined as the present value of the guaranteed minimum accumulation balance in excess of the current account balance.

 

Account balances of variable contracts’ separate accounts with guarantees were invested as follows:

 


 

(in millions)

 

September 30,
2004

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities (including mutual funds)

 

$

1,531

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

103

 

Total variable contracts’ separate account assets with guarantees

 

$

1,634

 

 

Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-1”) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-1-1, “Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP EITF 03-1-1”)

 

In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus on EITF 03-1, which was to be effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2004.  EITF 03-1 requires that when the fair value of an investment security is less than its carrying value an impairment exists for which a determination must be made as to whether the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary.  An impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s carrying value and its fair value when an impairment is other-than-temporary. Subsequent to an other-than temporary impairment loss, a debt security should be accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position No. 03-3, “Accounting for Loans and Certain Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer”, which allows the accretion of the discount between the carrying value and expected value of a security if the amount and timing of the receipt of expected cash flows is reasonably estimable.  EITF 03-1 also indicates that although not presumptive, a pattern of selling investments prior to the forecasted recovery may call into question an investor’s intent to hold the security until it recovers in value or otherwise matures.

 

The EITF 03-1 impairment model applies to all investment securities accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and to investment securities accounted for under the cost method. The final consensus on EITF 03-1 included additional disclosure requirements incremental to those adopted by the Company effective December 31, 2003 that will be effective December 31, 2004.

 

In September 2004, the FASB issued FSP EITF Issue 03-1-1, which deferred the effective date of the impairment measurement and recognition provisions contained in paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1 until proposed FSP EITF 03-1-a is issued. (See Pending accounting standard.)

 

7



 

Pending accounting standard

 

FSP EITF Issue 03-1-a, “Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP EITF Issue 03-1-a”).

 

In September 2004, the FASB issued proposed FSP EITF 03-1-a, that addresses the application of paragraph 16 of EITF Issue 03-1 to debt securities that are impaired because of increases in interest rates, and/or credit sector spread.  Thereafter, in connection with its decision to defer the effective date of paragraphs 10–20 of EITF 03-1 through the issuance of FSP EITF Issue 03-1-1, the FASB requested from its constituents information about both the issues set forth in FSP EITF 03-1-a as well as the issues that arose during the FSP EITF 03-1-b, “Effective Date of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”, comment letter process.

 

Due to the uncertainty as to how all of the relevant outstanding issues will be resolved, the Company is unable to determine the impact of adopting paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1 until final implementation guidance is issued.  Adoption of paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1 may have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Statements of Operation but is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Statements of Financial Position since fluctuations in fair value are already recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

2.  Reinsurance

 

The Company has reinsurance agreements whereby all premiums, contract charges, interest credited to contractholder funds, contract benefits and certain expenses are ceded to ALIC and certain non-affiliates and are reflected net of such reinsurance in the Condensed Statements of Operations.  The Company follows a comprehensive evaluation process involving credit scoring and capacity to select reinsurers.  Reinsurance recoverable and the related reserve for life-contingent contract benefits and contractholder funds are reported separately in the Condensed Statements of Financial Position.  The Company continues to have primary liability as the direct insurer for risks reinsured.

 

Investment income earned on the assets which support contractholder funds and the reserve for life-contingent contract benefits are not included in the Company’s Condensed Statements of Operations as those assets are owned and managed by ALIC or third party reinsurers under terms of the reinsurance agreements.

 

The effects of reinsurance on premiums and contract charges are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums and contract charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct

 

$

183,494

 

$

190,662

 

$

531,449

 

$

679,061

 

Assumed-non-affiliate

 

755

 

 

2,450

 

 

Ceded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate

 

(97,214

)

(114,074

)

(286,491

)

(445,899

)

Non-affiliate

 

(87,035

)

(76,588

)

(247,408

)

(233,162

)

Premiums and contract charges, net of reinsurance

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

The effects of reinsurance on interest credited to contractholder funds, contract benefits and certain expenses are as follows:

 

8



 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest credited to contractholder funds, contract benefits and certain expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct

 

$

377,942

 

$

374,392

 

$

1,185,589

 

$

1,179,518

 

Assumed-non-affiliate

 

1,177

 

 

3,440

 

 

Ceded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate

 

(275,680

)

(298,008

)

(912,340

)

(945,875

)

Non-affiliate

 

(103,439

)

(76,384

)

(276,689

)

(233,643

)

Interest credited to contractholder funds, contract benefits and certain expenses, net of reinsurance

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

3.  Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

 

Guarantees

 

The Company has issued universal life insurance contracts to third parties who finance the premium payments on the universal life insurance contracts through a commercial paper program.  The Company has issued a repayment guarantee on the outstanding commercial paper balance that is fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the universal life insurance contracts.  At September 30, 2004, the amount due under the commercial paper program is $302 million and the cash surrender value of the policies is $309 million.  The repayment guarantee expires April 30, 2006.  These contracts are ceded to ALIC under the terms of the reinsurance agreements.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard indemnifications to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions, including indemnifications for breaches of representations and warranties, taxes and certain other liabilities, such as third party lawsuits.  The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and were entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss would be remote.  The terms of the indemnifications vary in duration and nature.   In many cases, the maximum obligation is not explicitly stated and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur.  Because the obligated amounts of the indemnifications are not explicitly stated in many cases, the maximum amount of the obligation under such indemnifications is not determinable.  Historically, the Company has not made any material payments pursuant to these obligations.

 

The aggregate liability balance related to all guarantees was not material as of September 30, 2004.

 

Regulation

 

The Company is subject to changing social, economic and regulatory conditions.  Recent state and federal regulatory initiatives and proceedings have included efforts to remove barriers preventing banks from engaging in the securities and insurance businesses, change tax laws affecting the taxation of insurance companies and the tax treatment of insurance products or competing non-insurance products that may impact the relative desirability of various personal investment products and otherwise expand overall regulation of insurance products and the insurance industry. The ultimate changes and eventual effects of these initiatives on the Company’s business, if any, are uncertain.

 

Regulatory bodies have contacted the parent of the Company and have requested information relating to variable insurance products, including such areas as market timing and late trading and sales practices. The Company believes that these inquiries are similar to those made to many financial services companies as part of an industry-wide investigation by various regulatory agencies into the practices, policies and procedures relating to variable insurance products sales and subaccount trading practices. The Company’s

 

9



 

parent has and will continue to respond to these information requests and investigations. The Company at the present time is not aware of any systemic problems with respect to such matters that may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

Background

 

The Company and certain of its affiliates are named as defendants in a number of lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising out of various aspects of its business.  As background to the “Proceedings” sub-section below, please note the following:

 

                  These matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities, including but not limited to, the underlying facts of each matter, novel legal issues, variations between jurisdictions in which matters are being litigated, differences in applicable laws and judicial interpretations, the length of time before many of these matters might be resolved by settlement or through litigation and, in some cases, the timing of their resolutions relative to other similar cases brought against other companies, the fact that some of these matters are putative class actions in which a class has not been certified and in which the purported class may not be clearly defined, the fact that some of these matters involve multi-state class actions in which the applicable law(s) for the claims at issue is in dispute and therefore unclear, and the current challenging legal environment faced by large corporations and insurance companies.

 

                  In these matters, plaintiffs seek a variety of remedies including equitable relief in the form of injunctive and other remedies and monetary relief in the form of contractual and extra-contractual damages.  In some cases, the monetary damages sought include punitive damages or are not specified.  Often more specific information beyond the type of relief sought is not available because plaintiffs have not requested more specific relief in their court pleadings. In our experience, monetary demands in plaintiffs’ court pleadings bear little relation to the ultimate loss, if any, to the Company.

 

                  For the reasons specified above, it is not possible to make meaningful estimates of the amount or range of loss that could result from these matters at this time.  The Company reviews these matters on an on-going basis and follows the provisions of SFAS No.5, “Accounting for Contingencies” when making accrual and disclosure decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, the Company bases its decisions on its assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals.

 

                  In the opinion of the Company’s management, while some of these matters may be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period if an unfavorable outcome results, none will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

 

Proceedings

 

Legal proceedings involving Allstate agencies and AIC may impact the Company, even when the Company is not directly involved, because the Company sells its products through a variety of distribution channels including Allstate agencies. Consequently, information about the more significant of these proceedings is provided below.

 

AIC is defending various lawsuits involving worker classification issues. A putative nationwide class action filed by former employee agents includes a worker classification issue; these agents are challenging certain amendments to the Agents Pension Plan and are seeking to have exclusive agent independent contractors treated as employees for benefit purposes. This matter was dismissed with prejudice in late March 2004 by the trial court but will be the subject of further proceedings on appeal. AIC has been vigorously defending this and various other worker classification lawsuits. The outcome of these disputes is currently uncertain.

 

10



 

AIC is defending certain matters relating to its agency program reorganization announced in 1999. These matters include a lawsuit filed in December 2001 by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleging retaliation under federal civil rights laws, a class action filed in August 2001 by former employee agents alleging retaliation and age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, breach of contract and ERISA violations, and a lawsuit filed in October 2004 by the EEOC alleging age discrimination with respect to a policy limiting the rehire of agents affected by the agency program reorganization. AIC is also defending another action, in which a class was certified in June 2004, filed by former employee agents who terminated their employment prior to the agency program reorganization. These plaintiffs have asserted claims under ERISA and for constructive discharge, and are seeking the benefits provided in connection with the reorganization.  AIC has asked the court to reconsider its class certification ruling.  In late March 2004, in the first EEOC lawsuit and class action lawsuit, the trial court issued a memorandum and order that, among other things, certified classes of agents, including a mandatory class of agents who had signed a release, for purposes of effecting the court’s declaratory judgment that the release is voidable at the option of the release signer.  The court also ordered that an agent who voids the release must return to AIC “any and all benefits received by the [agent] in exchange for signing the release.”  The court also “concluded that, on the undisputed facts of record, there is no basis for claims of age discrimination.”  The EEOC and plaintiffs have asked the court to clarify and/or reconsider its memorandum and order.  The case otherwise remains pending.  A putative nationwide class action has also been filed by former employee agents alleging various violations of ERISA.  This matter was dismissed with prejudice in late March 2004 by the trial court but will be the subject of further proceedings on appeal.  In these matters, plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, and equitable relief.  AIC has been vigorously defending these lawsuits and other matters related to its agency program reorganization. In addition, AIC is defending certain matters relating to its life agency program reorganization announced in 2000. These matters include an investigation by the EEOC with respect to allegations of age discrimination and retaliation. AIC is cooperating fully with the agency investigation and will continue to vigorously defend these and other claims related to the life agency program reorganization. The outcome of these disputes is currently uncertain.

 

The Company is currently defending a nationwide class action lawsuit, alleging among other things, breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as a result of a change in the rate and cap on an annuity product.  The court certified the class and entered summary judgment in favor of the Company and against the certified class.  Plaintiff filed notice of appeal and the Company filed a cross appeal.  In June 2004, the Rhode Island Supreme Court upheld the class certification order but reversed the summary judgment order, entering judgment for the plaintiff class. The Company filed a Petition for Reargument in response to this Order. The Rhode Island Supreme Court denied the petition. The case will now be transferred back to the lower court for entry of an order in favor of the class.

 

Other Matters

 

The Corporation and its affiliates, including the Company, have received interrogatories and demands to produce information from several regulatory and enforcement authorities.  These authorities are seeking information relevant to on-going investigations into the possible violation of antitrust or insurance laws by unnamed parties and, in particular, are seeking information as to whether any person engaged in activities for the purpose of price fixing, market allocation, or bid rigging.  Published press reports have indicated that numerous demands of this nature have been sent to insurance companies as part of industry-wide investigations.  The Corporation intends to cooperate fully with these and any similar requests for information.

 

Various other legal and regulatory actions are currently pending that involve the Company and specific aspects of its conduct of business. Like other members of the insurance industry, the Company is the target of a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts. This litigation is based on a variety of issues including insurance and claim settlement practices. The outcome of these disputes is currently unpredictable.  However, at this time, based on their present status and the existence of the reinsurance agreement with ALIC, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate liability, if any, in one or more of these other actions in excess of amounts currently reserved is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

 

11



 

4.   Other Comprehensive Income

 

The components of other comprehensive income on a pretax and after-tax basis are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

(in thousands)

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

After-
tax

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

After-
tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized capital gains and losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

 

$

4,783

 

$

(1,674

)

$

3,109

 

$

(4,287

)

$

1,501

 

$

(2,786

)

Less: reclassification adjustments

 

5

 

(2

)

3

 

(66

)

23

 

(43

)

Unrealized net capital gains (losses)

 

4,778

 

(1,672

)

3,106

 

(4,221

)

1,478

 

(2,743

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

4,778

 

$

(1,672

)

3,106

 

$

(4,221

)

$

1,478

 

(2,743

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

1,836

 

 

 

 

 

1,768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,942

 

 

 

 

 

$

(975

)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

(in thousands)

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

After-
Tax

 

Pretax

 

Tax

 

After-
tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized capital gains and losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

 

$

(1,398

)

$

489

 

$

(909

)

$

(2,490

)

$

872

 

$

(1,618

)

Less: reclassification adjustments

 

5

 

(2

)

3

 

124

 

(43

)

81

 

Unrealized net capital gains (losses)

 

(1,403

)

491

 

(912

)

(2,614

)

915

 

(1,699

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(1,403

)

$

491

 

(912

)

$

(2,614

)

$

915

 

(1,699

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

5,458

 

 

 

 

 

5,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,546

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,954

 

 

12



 

Item 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003.

 

OVERVIEW

 

The following discussion highlights significant factors influencing the financial position and results of operations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company (referred to in this document as “we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company”).  It should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and notes thereto found under Part I. Item 1. contained herein, and with the discussion, analysis, financial statements and notes thereto in Part I. Item 1. and Part II. Item 7. and Item 8. of the Lincoln Benefit Life Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003.  We operate as a single segment entity, consistent with the way in which we use financial information to evaluate performance and to determine the allocation of resources.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income

 

$

2,817

 

$

2,782

 

$

8,382

 

$

8,613

 

Realized capital gains and losses

 

5

 

(66

)

5

 

73

 

Income tax expense

 

986

 

948

 

2,929

 

3,033

 

Net income

 

$

1,836

 

$

1,768

 

$

5,458

 

$

5,653

 

 

We have reinsurance agreements whereby all premiums, contract charges, interest credited to contractholder funds, contract benefits and certain expenses are ceded to Allstate Life Insurance Company (“ALIC”) and certain non-affiliated reinsurers, and reflected net of such reinsurance in the Condensed Statements of Operations.  Our results of operations include net investment income and realized capital gains and losses on our assets that are not transferred under the reinsurance agreements.

 

Net income in the third quarter of 2004 was comparable to the same period last year due to increases in net investment income and realized capital gains were partially offset by higher income tax expense. Net income decreased $195 thousand to $5.5 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $5.7 million for the same period last year as decreases in net investment income and realized capital gains, partially offset by lower income tax expense.

 

Net investment income increased 1.3% in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to higher portfolio balances partially offset by lower portfolio yields. Net investment income decreased 2.7% for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to lower portfolio yields being partially offset by the effects of higher portfolio balances from the investment of cash flows from operating activities.  Lower portfolio yields were due to purchases of fixed income securities with yields lower than the current portfolio average. Total investments as of September 30, 2004 increased 0.7% from September 30, 2003 due primarily to positive cash flows from operating activities, partially offset by a decline in unrealized capital gains on fixed income securities.

 

Pre-tax realized capital gains and losses increased $71 thousand in the third quarter of 2004 and decreased $68 thousand for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same periods in 2003 primarily the result of dispositions of fixed income securities.

 

13



 

FINANCIAL POSITION

 

(in thousands)

 

September 30,
2004

 

Fixed income securities (1)

 

$

212,297

 

Short-term

 

910

 

Total investments

 

$

213,207

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

23,197

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance recoverable from ALIC, net

 

16,289,451

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance recoverable from non-affiliates, net

 

793,959

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds

 

15,463,022

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits

 

1,604,843

 

 

 

 

 

Separate Accounts assets and liabilities

 

2,124,638

 

 


(1)          Fixed income securities are carried at fair value.  Amortized cost basis for these securities was $202.5 million.

 

Total investments increased to $213.2 million at September 30, 2004 from $210.2 million at December 31, 2003 due to increased cash flows from operating activities, partially offset by decreased unrealized gains on fixed income securities.

 

At September 30, 2004, the entire fixed income securities portfolio was rated investment grade, which is defined as a security having a rating from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) of 1 or 2, a Moody’s equivalent rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa; an S&P equivalent rating of AAA, AA, A or BBB; or a comparable internal rating when an external rating is not available.

 

The unrealized net capital gains on fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 were $9.8 million, a decrease of $1.4 million or 12.6% since December 31, 2003.  The net unrealized gain was comprised of $11.1 million of unrealized gains and $1.3 million of unrealized losses at September 30, 2004.  This is compared to a net unrealized gain for the fixed income portfolio totaling $11.2 million at December 31, 2003, comprised of $12.8 million of unrealized gains and $1.6 million of unrealized losses. The gross unrealized losses were concentrated in the corporate, mortgage-backed and U.S. Government and agencies portfolios at September 30, 2004. All of the gross unrealized losses were related to investment grade securities and were primarily interest rate related. Every security was included in our portfolio monitoring process.

 

Our portfolio monitoring process identifies and evaluates fixed income securities whose carrying value may be other than temporarily impaired.  The process includes a quarterly review of all securities using a screening process to identify those securities whose fair value compared to amortized cost for fixed income securities is below established thresholds for certain time periods, or which are identified through other monitoring criteria such as ratings downgrades or payment defaults.

 

We also monitor the quality of our fixed income portfolio by categorizing certain investments as “problem”, “restructured” or “potential problem.”  Problem fixed income securities are securities in default with respect to principal or interest and/or securities issued by companies that have gone into bankruptcy subsequent to our acquisition of the security.  Restructured fixed income securities have rates and terms that are not consistent with market rates or terms prevailing at the time of the restructuring.  Potential problem fixed income securities are current with respect to contractual principal and/or interest, but because of other facts and circumstances, we have serious concerns regarding the borrower’s ability to pay future principal and interest, which causes us to believe these securities may be classified as problem or restructured in the future.

 

14



 

As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had no securities categorized as  “problem”, “restructured” or “potential problem”.

 

While we may classify securities as “problem”, “restructured” or “potential problem” in the future, particularly if economic conditions are unfavorable, we expect that the total amount of securities in these categories would be low relative to the total fixed income securities portfolio.

 

Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses The following table presents the components of realized capital gains and losses and the related tax effect.

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dispositions

 

$

5

 

$

(66

)

$

5

 

$

73

 

Realized capital gains and losses, pretax

 

5

 

(66

)

5

 

73

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(2

)

23

 

(2

)

(26

)

Realized capital gains and losses, after-tax

 

$

3

 

$

(43

)

$

3

 

$

47

 

 

Dispositions in the above table include sales and other transactions such as calls and prepayments.  We may sell securities during the period in which fair value has declined below amortized cost.  In certain situations new factors such as negative developments, subsequent credit deterioration, relative value opportunities, market liquidity concerns and portfolio reallocations can subsequently change our previous intent to continue holding a security.

 

Reinsurance recoverable, Contractholder funds and Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits

 

Contractholder funds increased to $15.46 billion at September 30, 2004, from $13.80 billion at December 31, 2003 as a result of deposits from fixed annuities and interest-sensitive life policies, interest credited to contractholder funds and the initial adoption of the provisions of Statement of Position 03-1, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts” (“SOP 03-1”), partially offset by surrenders, withdrawals, benefit payments and contract charges.  The reserve for life-contingent contract benefits increased $129 million to $1.60 billion at September 30, 2004 from $1.48 billion at December 31, 2003, from new sales of traditional life and long term care products, additional reserves recorded due to the recognition of reserves for guaranteed minimum death benefits in conjunction with adopting the provisions of SOP 03-1, partially offset by benefits paid.  Reinsurance recoverable from ALIC and reinsurance recoverable from non-affiliates increased by $1.70 billion and $101 million, respectively, consistent with the reserve increase since all contractholder obligations and the net reserve for life-contingent contract benefits are reinsured.

 

We purchase reinsurance after evaluating the financial condition of the reinsurer, as well as the terms and price of coverage.  We reinsure certain of our risks to non-affiliated reinsurers under yearly renewable term and coinsurance agreements.  Yearly renewable term and coinsurance agreements result in passing the agreed-upon portion of risk to the reinsurers in exchange for negotiated reinsurance premium payments.

 

15



 

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

 

Capital Resources consist of shareholder’s equity.  The following table summarizes our capital resources:

 

(in thousands)

 

September 30,
2004

 

December 31,
2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, additional capital paid-in and retained income

 

$

208,206

 

$

202,748

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

6,353

 

7,265

 

Total shareholder’s equity

 

$

214,559

 

$

210,013

 

 

Shareholder’s equity increased for the first nine months of 2004 when compared to December 31, 2003, due to net income, partially offset by decreases in net unrealized capital gains.

 

Financial Ratings and Strength We share the insurance financial strength ratings of our parent, ALIC, because business is reinsured to ALIC. There have been no changes in ALIC’s insurance financial strength ratings since December 31, 2003.  However, in February 2004, A.M. Best revised the outlook to stable from positive for the insurance financial strength ratings of ALIC and certain rated subsidiaries and affiliates, including the Company.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTOR

 

This document contains “forward-looking statements” that anticipate results based on our estimates, assumptions and plans that are subject to uncertainty.  These statements are made subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments.

 

These forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “seeks,” “expects,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “believes,” “likely,” “targets” and other words with similar meanings.  These statements may address, among other things, our strategy for growth, product development, regulatory approvals, market position, expenses, financial results, litigation and reserves.  We believe that these statements are based on reasonable estimates, assumptions and plans.  However, if the estimates, assumptions or plans underlying the forward-looking statements prove inaccurate or if other risks or uncertainties arise, actual results could differ materially from those communicated in these forward-looking statements.  Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by such forward-looking statements are incorporated in this Part I, Item 2 by reference to the information set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part II, Item 7, under the caption  “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors.”

 

Any decrease in our financial strength rating may have an adverse effect on our competitive position

 

                  Financial strength ratings are important factors in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies and generally will have an effect on an insurance company’s business.  On an ongoing basis, rating agencies review the financial performance and condition of insurers and could downgrade or change the outlook on an insurer’s ratings due to, for example, a change in an insurer’s statutory capital; a change in a rating agency’s determination of the amount of risk-adjusted capital required to maintain a particular rating; an increase in the perceived risk of an insurer’s investment portfolio; a reduced confidence in management or a host of other considerations that may or may not be under the insurer’s control.  The insurance financial strength ratings of both Allstate Insurance Company and ALIC, as well as the Company, are A+, Aa2 and AA (from A.M. Best, Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, respectively).    Because all of these ratings are subject to continuous review, the retention of these ratings cannot be assured.  A multiple level downgrade in any of these ratings could have a material adverse effect on our sales, our competitiveness, the marketability of our product offerings and our liquidity, operating results and financial condition.

 

16



 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

With the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  However, the design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.  Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the “reasonable assurance” level.

 

During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

Information required for this Part II, Item 1 is incorporated by reference to the discussion under the heading “Regulation” and under the heading “Legal proceedings” in Note 3 of the Company’s Condensed Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

An Exhibit Index has been filed as part of this report on page E-1.

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Lincoln Benefit Life Company

 

 

 

 (Registrant)

 

 

November 10, 2004

 

 

 

 

By

/s/ Samuel H. Pilch

 

 

Samuel H. Pilch

 

Group Vice President and Controller

 

(chief accounting officer and duly authorized officer of the Registrant)

 

17



 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

31.1

 

 

Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

 

Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

Section 1350 Certifications

 

E-1